Neuropsychiatry’s Role in the Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19: Report From the American Neuropsychiatric Association Committee on Research
Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract
The postacute sequelae of COVID-19 infection (PASC), also known as post-COVID condition or “long COVID,” refers to symptoms that persist after the initial acute phase of the infection. PASC symptoms may occur in patients who had mild acute disease. On the basis of current data, commonly reported neurological and psychiatric symptoms in PASC include sleep problems, fatigue, cognitive impairment, headache, sensorimotor symptoms, dizziness, anxiety, irritability, and depression. Knowledge from neuropsychiatric sequelae of other viral infections, such as other coronaviruses, provides us with information about the heterogeneity and similarities of neuropsychiatric clinical presentations that may follow viral illnesses over a long period. Several, possibly overlapping, pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed to explain neuropsychiatric PASC: direct effects of the virus and immunological, vascular, functional, iatrogenic, and other etiologies. The authors present practice considerations for clinicians confronted with the challenge of evaluating and treating patients who have neuropsychiatric PASC. A comprehensive neuropsychiatric approach reviews historical factors, provides an objective assessment of symptoms, carefully considers all potential etiologies, and offers a therapeutic approach aimed at restoring premorbid functioning. Given the currently limited therapeutic options for neuropsychiatric PASC, unless an alternative etiology is identified, treatment should be symptom based and guided by evidence as it emerges.
In December 2019, several cases of atypical pneumonia were reported in Wuhan, China. The etiology of these cases was identified as a novel coronavirus called “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2, also known as COVID-19). The COVID-19 pandemic that ensued has devasted the world. As of September 9, 2021, more than 223 million cases had been confirmed and more than 4.5 million lives had been lost globally because of this disease, according to the Johns Hopkins University and Medicine Coronavirus Resource Center (1).
Acute neuropsychiatric symptoms (such as delirium, anosmia, dysgeusia, fatigue) have been described in nearly half of patients with severe COVID-19 infection, usually preceded by significant respiratory or systemic involvement (2, 3). Although those experiencing severe COVID-19 infection (i.e., requiring hospitalization) are more likely to develop long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms, patients with milder acute infection, often not requiring hospitalization, are slowly emerging as affected with neuropsychiatric symptoms during the subacute or chronic phase. Persistent symptoms after mild COVID-19 infection have been described in 10%–35% of patients (4).
The term “postacute sequelae of COVID-19” (PASC) refers to long-term complications from COVID-19 infection and is also known internationally as “post-COVID condition” (5) and increasingly as “long COVID.” PASC symptoms are defined as those that persist beyond the acute phase of the disease (usually 4–12 weeks), despite negative testing for COVID-19 for at least 1 week (6). The public health impact of persistent complications from COVID-19 infection is already significant and set to increase. In the United States, the National Institutes of Health have invested more than a billion dollars to fund research to better understand and treat PASC (7). Multidisciplinary efforts have been put in motion to address the challenge of managing long-term neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19. However, evidence guiding clinical decisions for this particular population remains limited.
The field of neuropsychiatry is uniquely positioned to best address the brain-based complications of PASC, which include any combination of cognitive, sensorimotor, behavioral, and emotional difficulties. The purpose of this article is to present our current understanding of the postacute neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 and other similar viral infections, review the various mechanisms that can lead to long-term neuropsychiatric complications, and provide a best-practice approach to clinicians who need to assess and manage patients, despite a currently incomplete and evolving understanding of the condition.
Neuropsychiatric Features of PASC
Evidence is emerging regarding the clinical features of PASC, or more likely, set of disorders with a diverse range of presentations. However, it is increasingly clear that neuropsychiatric features are a core part of PASC. Although symptoms from cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatological, and other systems occur, neurological and psychiatric symptoms are common: specifically, fatigue, brain fog and/or other cognitive symptoms, headache, dizziness, tinnitus, pain, and other sensory and/or motor (“sensorimotor”) disturbances. A meta-analysis of 52 studies (18,917 patients) with a search date of February 2021 indicated that, for the data so far, the most common persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms were sleep problems (27%), fatigue (24%), and objective cognitive impairment, as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or similar instruments (20%) (8). Other notable findings were that subjective cognitive impairment (i.e., patient report of memory or other cognitive symptoms) was slightly less commonly reported (15%), as were headache (7%), sensorimotor symptoms (6%), and dizziness (3%). In this meta-analysis, only two studies included control groups (8).
A major development of the pandemic has been the emergence of “patient-led” research, exemplified by an online survey of and by patients detailing the subjectively rated clinical features of 3,762 patients from 54 countries, 91.6% of whom were not hospitalized (9). Six months after initial infection, fatigue and postexertional malaise were common (98% and 89% respectively), but other neuropsychiatric symptoms were also commonly reported: sensorimotor (91%); cognitive (85%); sleep (79%); headache (77%); and dizziness, vertigo, or balance (67%) symptoms. Sensorimotor symptoms in this study covered a wide variety of sensory symptoms, such as tingling and/or “pins and needles” (49%), numbness and/or loss of sensation (36%), noise sensitivity (35%), and tinnitus (35%), as well as motor symptoms such as tremor (40%) and weakness (with numbness) on one side (12%) but also dizziness and/or vertigo and balance issues (68%). A wide range of other neuropsychiatric symptoms were reported, such as anxiety (58%), irritability (51%), depression (47%) and, to a lesser extent, depersonalization and/or derealization (27%) and hallucinations (15%) (9). Although online recruitment limits inferences to wider populations, this sample is likely to be broadly representative of patients seeking help with symptoms lasting beyond 3 months, especially those not initially hospitalized. The percentages of reported symptoms in this online self-report survey should be cautiously interpreted, given the limited description of each symptom or item offered to participants in the survey and the lack of clinician corroboration through validated measures. Clinician-rated data of epidemiological samples of PASC are urgently needed to complement these important early data.
Regarding cognitive impairments, a large online study of cognition in >81,000 U.K. participants, coincidentally recruited during the pandemic, found that those who had recovered from COVID-19 had significant multidomain cognitive impairments compared with healthy persons, and the magnitude of these impairments was associated with the severity of acute respiratory illness. The study used the “Cognitron” battery, a composite of nine tests assessing spatial ability, memory, emotional intelligence, attention span and problem-solving developed and used to broadly assess cognition in a large U.K. population study (10). Scores from hospitalized patients were 0.47 standard deviations lower if patients had been treated with a ventilator, equivalent to a 7-point drop in IQ, and 0.26 lower if not previously treated with a ventilator. Nonhospitalized patients had scores that were 0.13 standard deviations lower if assisted at home for respiratory difficulty, 0.07 standard deviations lower if no medical assistance had been received but they still experienced respiratory difficulty, and 0.04 standard deviations lower if they had not had respiratory difficulty. By using this same measure, those who had experienced a stroke scored 0.24 standard deviations lower than healthy comparators, and those with learning disability scored 0.38 standard deviations lower than healthy comparators, giving a sense of the clinical significance of observed deficits in post-COVID patients (10). The authors reported a broad but variable profile of deficits across a range of tests, with larger associations for more complex tasks that required reasoning, planning, and problem solving (e.g., verbal analogies, Blocks and Tower of London tests) compared with basic working memory functions (e.g., digit span and spatial span or emotional discriminations).
Postviral Neuropsychiatric Sequelae from Other Viruses
Postviral neuropsychiatric sequelae from other coronaviruses, in particular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) demonstrate some similarities with PASC. SARS-CoV-1 was identified in Asia in 2003 and MERS was identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012. Acute infection with both coronaviruses causes high fever with dry cough, leading to acute respiratory distress. A meta-analysis of neuropsychiatric presentations of both coronavirus infections based on 40 studies (including 1,192 SARS survivors and 140 MERS survivors) summarized follow-up between 60 days and 12 years after the infection (11). The most frequently reported symptoms were cognitive complaints (impaired concentration or attention, 20%; impaired memory, 19%), disturbances of emotion (emotional lability, 23%; irritability, 13%; anxiety, 12%; depressed mood, 11%), fatigue (19%), insomnia (12%), and recall of traumatic memories (30%). Differences in frequency of neuropsychiatric sequelae in MERS and SARS-CoV-1, compared with those reported in PASC, may be explained by a variety of factors, such as methodological differences in the studies, time-point when assessments were performed, and ascertainment bias (11).
The similarity in the type of reported symptoms between PASC and postacute sequelae from MERS and SARS-CoV-1 seems to suggest a potentially similar underlying mechanism linked to neuropsychiatric symptoms for all coronaviruses. However, similar neuropsychiatric symptoms (most often chronic fatigue) have been associated with other viral infection outbreaks or epidemics, such as Epstein-Barr (12, 13), Chikungunya (14), Zika virus (15), or Ross River virus (12). In contrast, other viruses lead to syndromes with different neuropsychiatric features. For instance, Herpes simplex virus 1 infection may cause long-term sequelae with amnesia, disinhibition, and/or apathy, and West Nile virus may lead to persistent movement abnormalities in the postacute period (16).
Mechanisms of Neuropsychiatric PASC
Although etiologies for the neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 remain largely conjectural, several potential pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed. Ultimately, many neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms likely result from the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to cause damage to cells in the central nervous system (CNS) as a result of either direct viral neuroinvasion or via systemic effects of infection triggering hypoxia, hypertension, or persistent neuroinflammation. Resultant symptoms, then, will depend on the areas of the CNS taking the brunt of this damage: cognitive impairment and brain fog due to damage to the cerebral cortex, especially areas involved in executive function, such as the prefrontal or cingulate cortex (17–19); motor disturbances and other sensorimotor symptoms, such as dizziness and vertigo, resulting from damage to the thalamus or brainstem regions containing vital centers for sensorimotor integration and vestibular processing (20, 21); sleep disturbances resulting from disruption to regions of the thalamus and brainstem involved in the sleep-wake cycle (21, 22); and fatigue due to infection of circumventricular organs, including the hypothalamus (19). Dizziness may also result from inflammation of the inner ear (acute labyrinthitis) or vestibular nerve (vestibular neuritis) or from damage to auditory glial cells following neuroinflammation (21). Given the evidence for associations between cytokine dysregulation and psychiatric disorders, aberrations in immune response and “cytokine storm”-triggered neuroinflammation may explain psychiatric PASC symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, or psychosis (23, 24). Psychopathological outcomes may also be exacerbated or triggered by pandemic-related stressors, including job loss, financial struggles, social isolation, or fears of infection (23, 24). Critically, many of these symptoms—brain fog, fatigue, headache, mood disorders—may be multifactorial in etiology, exacerbate one another, and/or result from complex interactions between the viral infection itself, preexisting conditions, and social-experiential factors (23, 25, 26).
Below, we discuss the major mechanisms being considered to explain neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms.
Direct Effects of the Virus
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor binding.
The spike protein of the COVID-19 virus is thought to bind to ACE2 receptors on cell surfaces to facilitate fusion of viral and host membranes (27, 28). The infection of endothelial cells in this way may damage the blood-brain barrier (BBB), allowing the virus to enter the brain (29, 30). Once the virus crosses the BBB, it can easily bind to the neurons, because of the high density of ACE2 receptors, and lie latent in neurons, increasing the risk of potential long-term consequences such as demyelination and neurodegeneration (31).
Direct neural infiltration.
Invasion into the CNS may also occur via retrograde axonal transport from peripheral nerve endings, resulting in neuronal cell death (32, 33). It has been speculated that the neuroinvasive potential of the virus, particularly of medullary structures, may partially mediate the high incidence of respiratory failure seen in COVID-19 (30). However, direct viral invasion of the CNS appears to be rare, even among patients who are severely symptomatic (34, 35).
Effects on brain structure.
A U.K. Biobank study that compared brain imaging before and after COVID-19 infection in both infected and noninfected individuals (totaling 782 scanned subjects matched for time intervals between scans) revealed potential effects on brain structure from COVID-19 on the olfactory and gustatory cortical systems (36). These changes included more pronounced loss of gray matter in the left parahippocampal gyrus, left lateral orbitofrontal cortex, left insula, left anterior cingulate cortex, supramarginal gyrus, and right temporal pole in the COVID-19 patients (36). Although these findings do not offer an explanatory mechanism, they provide a potential direct effect of the virus on brain structures.
Immune Effects
Neuroinflammation and cytokine dysregulation.
Neuroinflammation is a well-recognized mechanism for the development of psychiatric disorders (37). Intranasally inoculated COVID-19 infection in ACE2 transgenic mice has demonstrated neuronal death and upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine secretion by neurons and astrocytes (33). Peripheral cytokines involved in the host’s antiviral response may precipitate neuroinflammatory responses and/or compromise blood-brain interface integrity, leading to peripheral immune cell migration into the CNS and to disruption of dopaminergic neurotransmission via oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (38).
Serum levels of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10, and IL-6, were significantly higher among fatal cases of COVID-19 encephalopathy, suggesting a “cytokine storm syndrome.” This syndrome, also observed during SARS-CoV-1 infections, reinforces inflammatory cascades with reduced lymphocytes and increased cytokines (39). Evidence that leukocytes can remain persistently infected by coronaviruses suggests that CoV-infected immune cells could serve as a source of neuroinflammation over a significantly longer period than the initial infection and acute symptom presentation (40, 41).
Postinfectious autoimmunity.
Autoimmune disorders of the nervous system have been described following coronavirus infections (42, 43). Viral infection may create an inflammatory milieu which favors aberrant immune responses and promotes expansion of host antibodies or lymphocytes that are cross-reactive with both viral antigen and self-antigen (44, 45).
Vascular Effects
COVID-19 has been associated with changes in coagulation and, in particular, with inflammation-induced disseminated intravascular disease. Cerebrovascular disease can occur, even among young patients, in the context of endothelial dysfunction leading to large vessel ischemic stroke. Severe COVID-19 infection and preexisting vascular risk can exacerbate the risk of cerebrovascular complications (46).
Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury
Histopathological changes consistent with hypoxia were demonstrated in 28% of examined brains (from individuals who had died from COVID-19, mostly from cardiorespiratory illness) analyzed in a systematic review (47). These hypoxic changes were identified in several brain regions, including the cortex, olfactory bulb, optic chiasm, hippocampus, subcortical white matter, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and brainstem (47). Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury is known to affect several areas of cognition, including attention, processing speed, memory, executive function, and consciousness (48), and lead to other neurological symptoms, such as seizures, myoclonus, and movement disorders (49). Survivors from hypoxic-ischemic brain injury during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection are therefore at increased risk of long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae.
Functional Etiology
Functional neurological symptoms are the second most common diagnosis in neurology outpatient practice after headache and a common differential for any neurological presentation, including cognitive disorders (50). Functional symptoms often develop from, and coexist with, other neurological diagnoses from which they can be reliably distinguished by “positive” signs, such as Hoover’s sign for leg weakness or entrainment for tremors which demonstrate incompatibility with known pathophysiological processes (51). Therefore, one would expect some neuropsychiatric complaints after COVID-19 to potentially have a functional etiology. In general, functional etiology implies multiple cognitive mechanisms, such as somatic attention and predictive bias, all of which occur outside of the individual’s awareness (52). As such, a functional etiology does not imply that symptoms are under conscious control or due to anxiety or stress. Importantly, purely “psychogenic” models have been replaced, as psychological stressors may or may not be present (53).
Over and above such potential functional mechanisms, patients may perceive and report distress in response to respiratory symptoms, which can trigger a combination of emotional, cognitive, and/or endocrine responses that may also mediate long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms (54). Stress can also be influenced by several other psychosocial and economic factors that have taken place in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic (23, 24).
Iatrogenic Effects
Corticosteroids have been used in some cases to treat acutely infected COVID-19 patients (55). High doses of corticosteroids in SARS-CoV-1 infections were associated with psychiatric symptoms (56, 57), and similar symptoms might be observed among COVID-19 patients treated with steroids. In addition, treatment in an intensive care unit can affect sleep, cognition, and mental health (58), and severe disease has been associated with critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (59).
Gut Microbial Translocation
Viral shedding in feces of COVID-19 patients is known to occur for at least 5 weeks postinfection (29). Although the extent and mechanisms of viral infiltration of gut epithelium by COVID-19 are currently unknown, ACE2 is expressed by gut epithelial cells, and almost 40% of infected patients manifest gastrointestinal symptoms (60). Speculatively, changes in gut microbial composition that are due to COVID-19 infection could facilitate neuropsychiatric symptoms via the gut-brain axis (61).
Practice Considerations
Given the evolving understanding of PASC, clinicians are faced with the challenge of having to assess and manage patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms linked to COVID-19.
Evaluation
Initial evaluations should be comprehensive and cover all possible biological and psychosocial factors. COVID-19 acute respiratory and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and their presumed pathophysiological mechanisms (i.e., embolic stroke, hypoxic-ischemic brain injury) and treatments (i.e., steroids, other antimicrobial therapies), help clarify the extent and severity of the initial insult. Time correlation to a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction antigen (or antibody) test helps solidify etiological correlation to acute symptoms; however, variable access to testing needs to be considered, alongside the usual sensitivity and specificity of the particular test, combined with clinical compatibility of the symptoms with COVID-19. As in any comprehensive assessment, a detailed medical and neuropsychiatric background history can uncover preexisting conditions that may be predisposing, although the significance of preexisting conditions for the development of PASC symptoms is not yet fully understood. Medical, neurological, and psychiatric conditions that could alternatively cause similar symptoms need to be considered. This is relevant because many neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms can be explained by other etiologies, and the onset after a COVID-19 infection may be coincidental, as is the case with other conditions (62).
A thorough examination, including both broad objective, as well as subjective, cognitive assessment helps characterize symptoms. Cognitive screening measures, such as the MMSE, MoCA and the six-item Cognitive Impairment Test, or the domain-specific Frontal Assessment Battery, have been used in post-COVID or PASC patient samples to detect cognitive impairment (63–66). When evidence for the use of a cognitive test in this clinical population is not yet available, other cognitive measures may be considered and should be consistent with recommendations from the American Academy of Neurology Behavioral Neurology Section Workgroup (67) or the DSM-5 (68). Examples of domain-specific cognitive tests in the public domain that align with those recommendations are offered in Table 1. Further detailed neuropsychological assessment may help quantify cognitive deficits and is useful for longitudinal comparison of performance. The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests consists of a group of tests that evaluate verbal memory (Selective Reminding Test), visuospatial memory (Spatial Recall Test), attention and processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), working memory and sustained attention (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test), and semantic verbal fluency (Word List Generation Test). This battery has been used in post-COVID patients (69).
Self-rating symptom- or syndrome-specific screening instruments are ideal to highlight disabling symptoms and to monitor progress over time. Many such instruments have already been used in patients after the acute phase of a COVID-19 infection. Examples include the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for major depressive episode symptoms (65, 70, 71), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) for GAD (65, 70, 71), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Check List for DSM-5 or Impact of Event Scale–Revised (IES-R) for traumatic stress response (23, 71, 72), Cognitive Failures Questionnaire for subjective cognitive complaints (72) (to be supplemented by objective cognitive evaluation), Fatigue Assessment Scale for fatigue severity (73), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index or Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale for sleep impairment (64, 74), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) for somatic distress (75). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS Global-10) measures impact on functioning and quality of life and provides scores on global physical and mental health (76). Formal assessment of pain severity with a numerical rating scale (77), included in the PROMIS Global-10, can be useful to guide treatment of pain syndromes, including headache.
Most studies of patients with PASC rely on subjective report of neurological symptoms, such as dysosmia, dysgeusia, or sensorimotor dysfunction (e.g., paresthesia, numbness, and weakness) (8). In addition to screening for such symptoms, an elemental neurological exam will help corroborate reported cranial nerve abnormalities (78), identify focal deficits and neuropathies (79), and/or provide positive signs of functional neurological disorder (80).
As of now, there is no pathognomonic neuroimaging sign typical of neuropsychiatric PASC. However, clinicians should have a low threshold to consider neuroimaging during an initial assessment, especially in the presence of focal symptoms (whether motor, sensory, or cognitive). As of now, the clinical significance of abnormal laboratory findings for patients with PASC symptoms remains unknown (other than screening for alternative etiologies). Laboratory exams screening for inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., serum cytokines such as c-reactive protein, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha) may eventually provide a link to a possible neuropathological mechanism to explain some PASC symptoms but are not currently justified clinically outside of a research context. Table 1 lists clinical information, cognitive tests, and screening scales informed by existing evidence that can assist during the initial evaluation of patients with PASC (81–86).
Treatment
Until a clear pathological mechanism for PASC symptoms is identified, the therapeutic approach remains etiologically agnostic and symptom focused. If a secondary etiology is known to play a role in the development of symptoms (e.g., embolic stroke, steroid-induced symptoms, functional etiology that is based on positive signs), then clinicians should treat those symptoms as indicated by the identified etiology. Other neuroinvasive viral infections with long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae offer limited therapeutic guidance because evidence for treatment is lacking (16), and even if such evidence existed, it is unclear whether pathogenic mechanisms would be similar enough across viruses for therapeutic benefit to translate to PASC.
Rehabilitative and behavioral (e.g., mindfulness-based) interdisciplinary approaches can be useful to reduce fatigue and pain symptoms, as shown by transdiagnostic evidence of efficacy in other neurological diagnoses (87, 88). A gradual pacing of activities to develop cognitive and physical tolerance can alleviate symptom severity and impact on functioning among post-COVID patients (6). Cognitive rehabilitation can help manage deficits in attention, executive functioning, memory, emotional regulation, and self-efficacy, as seen in evidence from other neuropsychiatric conditions (89).
Management of mood, anxiety, and trauma-related symptoms should follow evidence-based recommendations per existing clinical practice guidelines (90, 91). There is no current evidence to suggest that treatment of emotional disturbances in the context of PASC should differ substantially from the management of their equivalent primary psychiatric diagnoses. This, however, may change as we better understand the underlying pathophysiology of PASC and its therapeutic implications.
There is also limited evidence to support the use of psychopharmacological agents to treat other neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms, even by analogy to diagnoses with overlapping symptoms. Medications that promote wakefulness through histaminergic neurotransmission, such as modafinil or armodafinil, have inconclusive evidence to treat fatigue across neuropsychiatric conditions (92). For cognitive symptoms, the benefit of medications that increase dopaminergic neurotransmission (e.g., methylphenidate) in other neuropsychiatric conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, is limited to short-lived improvements in attention (93). Clinicians may therefore need to engage in sequential empirical trials of medications to address specific PASC symptoms, such as fatigue or cognitive complaints, especially if nonpharmacological interventions are unsuccessful. Rational psychopharmacotherapy principles should be practiced. For instance, dual-purpose therapies (e.g., amitriptyline for any combination of insomnia, headache, pain, depression, or anxiety) can minimize exposure to multiple drugs.
We recommend measuring symptom severity over time to assess therapeutic response. Depending on impact on vocational and social functioning, interventions should aim to reestablish preinfection functioning when possible. Table 2 outlines suggestions for the management of patients with neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms, following evidence-guided information when possible.
| Principle | Practice |
|---|---|
| Psychoeducation | Educate patient and family about current understanding of PASC. |
| Measure-driven approach | Use measurements to monitor symptom progress over time (see screening instruments in Table 1). |
| Treatment of underlying pathophysiology | No current treatment options to target underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of PASC. Consider alternative etiologies and treat accordingly. For example, if a functional neurological symptom is identified on the basis of positive signs, treat by using evidence-based treatments for that symptom. |
| Symptom-based treatment | For fatigue, pain, and cognitive symptoms, favor interdisciplinary rehabilitative approaches (including exercise and behavioral treatments) supported by evidence or by analogy to other neuropsychiatric conditions (6, 87–89). When pursuing psychopharmacotherapy, consider sequential empirical trials to address specific symptoms. For mood, anxiety, and trauma-based symptoms, follow the evidence and/or clinical practice guidelines for primary individual diagnoses or syndromes (90, 91). |
Conclusions
A viral infection with known CNS involvement can lead to prolonged neuropsychiatric symptoms. In the case of persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms from COVID-19, we currently know little about the mechanisms and risk factors that explain interindividual variations. Neuropsychiatric symptoms attributed to PASC, such as fatigue, depression, anxiety, and impaired cognition, are also common in the general population. It is therefore challenging to disentangle symptoms that are directly due to the viral infection from those that are secondary to living with a poorly understood disorder or are potentially coincidental. Given the extent of unknowns, it is essential to keep an agnostic approach in terms of etiology, with a focus on systematic data collection to elucidate mechanisms. Clinicians must both avoid invalidating medical symptoms and consider the possibility of alternative etiologies, such as functional syndromes with modern nuanced explanations of their mechanisms, when supported by the examination.
The optimal long-term approach to neuropsychiatric PASC symptoms from a societal and medical point of view also remains to be determined. The development of dedicated clinical centers for PASC is a promising avenue to ensure adequate research and to provide a centralized access point for patients. It is hoped that evaluation and rehabilitation services in identified institutions could avoid the development of invasive or potentially harmful therapies that are not validated by science. We argue that the neuropsychiatric framework is crucial to ensure that both medical and psychosocial factors are adequately factored into the assessment and treatment of patients with prior COVID-19 infection who develop long-term debilitating symptoms.
References
1.
Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu
2.
Rogers JP, Watson CJ, Badenoch J, et al: Neurology and neuropsychiatry of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the early literature reveals frequent CNS manifestations and key emerging narratives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:932–941
3.
Singh B, Lant S, Cividini S, et al: Prognostic indicators and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with neurological disease: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. SSRN Journal, 2021. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3834310
4.
van Kessel SAM, Olde Hartman TC, Lucassen PLBJ, et al.: Post-acute and long-COVID-19 symptoms in patients with mild diseases: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2021; cmab076
5.
World Health Organization: Global COVID-19 clinical platform case report form (CRF) for post COVID condition (post COVID-19 CRF). Geneva, World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-covid-19-clinical-platform-case-report-form-(crf)-for-post-covid-conditions-(post-covid-19-crf-)
6.
Jimeno-Almazán A, Pallarés JG, Buendía-Romero Á, et al: Post-COVID-19 syndrome and the potential benefits of exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:5329
7.
Subbaraman N: US health agency will invest $1 billion to investigate ‘long COVID’. Nature 2021; 591:356
8.
Badenoch JB, Rengasamy ER, Watson CJ, et al: Persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv 2021. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.04.30.21256413
9.
Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, et al: Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 38:101019
10.
Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, et al: Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 39:101044
11.
Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, et al: Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7:611–627
12.
Hickie I, Davenport T, Wakefield D, et al: Post-infective and chronic fatigue syndromes precipitated by viral and non-viral pathogens: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2006; 333:575
13.
Katz BZ, Shiraishi Y, Mears CJ, et al: Chronic fatigue syndrome after infectious mononucleosis in adolescents. Pediatrics 2009; 124:189–193
14.
Elsinga J, Gerstenbluth I, van der Ploeg S, et al: Long-term chikungunya sequelae in Curaçao: burden, determinants, and a novel classification tool. J Infect Dis 2017; 216:573–581
15.
Koppolu V, Shantha Raju T: Zika virus outbreak: a review of neurological complications, diagnosis, and treatment options. J Neurovirol 2018; 24:255–272
16.
Arciniegas DB, Anderson CA: Viral encephalitis: neuropsychiatric and neurobehavioral aspects. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2004; 6:372–379
17.
Daroische R, Hemminghyth MS, Eilertsen TH, et al: Cognitive impairment after COVID-19—a review on objective test data. Front Neurol 2021; 12:699582
18.
Sasannejad C, Ely EW, Lahiri S: Long-term cognitive impairment after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a review of clinical impact and pathophysiological mechanisms. Crit Care 2019; 23:352
19.
Sharma P, Bharti S, Garg I: Post COVID fatigue: can we really ignore it? Indian J Tuberc 2021. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijtb.2021.06.012
20.
Saniasiaya J, Kulasegarah J: Dizziness and COVID-19. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 100:29–30
21.
Jafari Z, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH: Hearing loss, tinnitus, and dizziness in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci (Online ahead of print, April 12, 2021)
22.
Lin YN, Liu ZR, Li SQ, et al: Burden of sleep disturbance during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Nat Sci Sleep 2021; 13:933–966
23.
Mazza MG, De Lorenzo R, Conte C, et al: Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 89:594–600
24.
Chinna K, Sundarasen S, Khoshaim HB, et al: Psychological impact of COVID-19 and lock down measures: an online cross-sectional multicounty study on Asian university students. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0253059
25.
Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, et al: Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240784
26.
Martelletti P, Bentivegna E, Spuntarelli V, et al: Long-COVID headache. SN Compr Clin Med (Online ahead of print, May 20, 2021)
27.
Achar A, Ghosh C: COVID-19-associated neurological disorders: the potential route of CNS invasion and blood-brain relevance. Cells 2020; 9:2360
28.
Jasti M, Nalleballe K, Dandu V, et al: A review of pathophysiology and neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19. J Neurol 2021; 268:2007–2012
29.
Wu Y, Xu X, Chen Z, et al: Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 87:18–22
30.
Li YC, Bai WZ, Hashikawa T: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 2020; 92:552–555
31.
Lippi A, Domingues R, Setz C, et al: SARS-CoV-2: at the crossroad between aging and neurodegeneration. Mov Disord 2020; 35:716–720
32.
Desforges M, Le Coupanec A, Dubeau P, et al: Human coronaviruses and other respiratory viruses: underestimated opportunistic pathogens of the central nervous system? Viruses 2019; 12:14
33.
Netland J, Meyerholz DK, Moore S, et al: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J Virol 2008; 82:7264–7275
34.
Moriguchi T, Harii N, Goto J, et al: A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-coronavirus-2. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 94:55–58
35.
Al Saiegh F, Ghosh R, Leibold A, et al: Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020; 91:846–848
36.
Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, et al: Brain Imaging Before and After COVID-19 in UK Biobank. medRxiv (Preprint June 20, 2021) 2021. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690
37.
Yuan N, Chen Y, Xia Y, et al: Inflammation-related biomarkers in major psychiatric disorders: a cross-disorder assessment of reproducibility and specificity in 43 meta-analyses. Transl Psychiatry 2019; 9:233
38.
Dantzer R: Neuroimmune interactions: from the brain to the immune system and vice versa. Physiol Rev 2018; 98:477–504
39.
Serrano-Castro PJ, Estivill-Torrús G, Cabezudo-García P, et al: Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases: a delayed pandemic? Neurologia (Engl Ed) 2020; 35:245–251
40.
Arbour N, Day R, Newcombe J, et al: Neuroinvasion by human respiratory coronaviruses. J Virol 2000; 74:8913–8921
41.
Desforges M, Miletti TC, Gagnon M, et al: Activation of human monocytes after infection by human coronavirus 229E. Virus Res 2007; 130:228–240
42.
Kim J-E, Heo J-H, Kim HO, et al: Neurological complications during treatment of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. J Clin Neurol 2017; 13:227–233
43.
Tsai L-K, Hsieh S-T, Chao C-C, et al: Neuromuscular disorders in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Arch Neurol 2004; 61:1669–1673
44.
Fairweather D, Frisancho-Kiss S, Rose NR: Viruses as adjuvants for autoimmunity: evidence from Coxsackievirus-induced myocarditis. Rev Med Virol 2005; 15:17–27
45.
Rose NR: Negative selection, epitope mimicry and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol 2017; 49:51–55
46.
Heneka MT, Golenbock D, Latz E, et al: Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020; 12:69
47.
Pajo AT, Espiritu AI, Apor ADAO, et al: Neuropathologic findings of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:1255–1266
48.
Anderson CA, Arciniegas DB: Cognitive sequelae of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 2010; 26:47–63
49.
Lu-Emerson C, Khot S: Neurological sequelae of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2010; 26:35–45
50.
Stone J, Carson A, Duncan R, et al: Who is referred to neurology clinics?—the diagnoses made in 3781 new patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010; 112:747–751
51.
Espay AJ, Aybek S, Carson A, et al: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of functional neurological disorders. JAMA Neurol 2018; 75:1132–1141
52.
Edwards MJ, Adams RA, Brown H, et al: A Bayesian account of ‘hysteria’. Brain 2012; 135:3495–3512
53.
Ludwig L, Pasman JA, Nicholson T, et al: Stressful life events and maltreatment in conversion (functional neurological) disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:307–320
54.
Troyer EA, Kohn JN, Hong S: Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19? Neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 87:34–39
55.
Liu K, Fang Y-Y, Deng Y, et al: Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei province. Chin Med J (Engl) 2020; 133:1025–1031
56.
Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, et al: A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1986–1994
57.
Cheng SK-W, Tsang JS-K, Ku K-H, et al: Psychiatric complications in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) during the acute treatment phase: a series of 10 cases. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184:359–360
58.
Rousseau A-F, Minguet P, Colson C, et al: Post-intensive care syndrome after a critical COVID-19: cohort study from a Belgian follow-up clinic. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:118
59.
Burchill E, Rogers JP, Needham D, et al: Neuropsychiatric disorders and COVID-19. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:564–565
60.
Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al: Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020; 75:1730–1741
61.
Li N, Ma W-T, Pang M, et al: The commensal microbiota and viral infection: a comprehensive review. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1551
62.
Asken BM, Snyder AR, Smith MS, et al: Concussion-like symptom reporting in non-concussed adolescent athletes. Clin Neuropsychol 2017; 31:138–153
63.
Tomasoni D, Bai F, Castoldi R, et al: Anxiety and depression symptoms after virological clearance of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Milan, Italy. J Med Virol 2021; 93:1175–1179
64.
De Lorenzo R, Conte C, Lanzani C, et al: Residual clinical damage after COVID-19: a retrospective and prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239570
65.
D’Cruz RF, Waller MD, Perrin F, et al: Chest radiography is a poor predictor of respiratory symptoms and functional impairment in survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00655–02020
66.
Ortelli P, Ferrazzoli D, Sebastianelli L, et al: Neuropsychological and neurophysiological correlates of fatigue in post-acute patients with neurological manifestations of COVID-19: insights into a challenging symptom. J Neurol Sci 2021; 420:117271
67.
Daffner KR, Gale SA, Barrett AM, et al: Improving clinical cognitive testing: report of the AAN Behavioral Neurology Section Workgroup. Neurology 2015; 85:910–918
68.
Neurocognitive disorders; in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2013
69.
Ferrucci R, Dini M, Groppo E, et al: Long-lasting cognitive abnormalities after COVID-19. Brain Sci 2021; 11:235
70.
Wu C, Hu X, Song J, et al: Mental health status and related influencing factors of COVID-19 survivors in Wuhan, China. Clin Transl Med 2020; 10:e52
71.
Liu D, Baumeister RF, Veilleux JC, et al: Risk factors associated with mental illness in hospital discharged patients infected with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Psychiatry Res 2020; 292:113297
72.
van den Borst B, Peters JB, Brink M, et al: Comprehensive health assessment 3 months after recovery from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:e1089–e1098
73.
El Sayed S, Shokry D, Gomaa SM: Post-COVID-19 fatigue and anhedonia: a cross-sectional study and their correlation to post-recovery period. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep 2021; 41:50–55
74.
Poyraz BÇ, Poyraz CA, Olgun Y, et al: Psychiatric morbidity and protracted symptoms after COVID-19. Psychiatry Res 2021; 295:113604
75.
Lee JH, Lee D, Hyun S, et al: Online mental health assessments of COVID-19 patients in South Korea. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:685445
76.
Jacobs LG, Gourna Paleoudis E, Lesky-Di Bari D, et al: Persistence of symptoms and quality of life at 35 days after hospitalization for COVID-19 infection. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0243882
77.
Tuzun S, Keles A, Okutan D, et al: Assessment of musculoskeletal pain, fatigue and grip strength in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57:653–662
78.
Doblan A, Kaplama ME, Ak S, et al: Cranial nerve involvement in COVID-19. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42:102999
79.
Webb S, Wallace VC, Martin-Lopez D, et al: Guillain-Barré syndrome following COVID-19: a newly emerging post-infectious complication. BMJ Case Rep 2020; 13:e236182
80.
Garg A, Goyal S, Comellas AP: Post-acute COVID-19 functional movement disorder. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2021; 9:2050313X211039377
81.
Tombaugh TN: Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19:203–214
82.
Welsh KA, Butters N, Mohs RC, et al: The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology 1994; 44:609–614
83.
Gladsjo JA, Schuman CC, Evans JD, et al: Norms for letter and category fluency: demographic corrections for age, education, and ethnicity. Assessment 1999; 6:147–178
84.
Drent M, Lower EE, De Vries J: Sarcoidosis-associated fatigue. Eur Respir J 2012; 40:255–263
85.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, et al: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28:193–213
86.
Boonstra AM, Stewart RE, Köke AJA, et al: Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the numeric rating scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: variability and influence of sex and catastrophizing. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1466
87.
Penner I-K, Paul F: Fatigue as a symptom or comorbidity of neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13:662–675
88.
Sanders SH, Harden RN, Vicente PJ: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for interdisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic nonmalignant pain syndrome patients. Pain Pract 2005; 5:303–315
89.
Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, et al: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100:1515–1533
90.
Malhi GS, Bell E, Singh AB, et al: The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders: major depression summary. Bipolar Disord 2020; 22:788–804
91.
Katzman MA, Bleau P, Blier P, et al: Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14(Suppl 1):S1
92.
Sheng P, Hou L, Wang X, et al: Efficacy of modafinil on fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness associated with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8:e81802
93.
Maksimowski MB, Tampi RR: Efficacy of stimulants for psychiatric symptoms in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2016; 28:156–166
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 16 August 2021
Revision received: 22 September 2021
Revision received: 5 October 2021
Accepted: 18 October 2021
Published online: 17 May 2022
Published in print: Fall 2022
Keywords
Authors
Funding Information
Dr. Baslet reports receipt of royalties from Oxford University Press. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).