Personality Disorders Among Medically Refractory Epileptic Patients

Subjects with medically refractory seizures who were admitted to the UCLA Seizure Disorder Center for EEG telemetry evaluation as candidates for surgical treatment were selected on the basis of available data for the analysis described in the present study. Informed consent was obtained for all components of the study.

Fifty-seven patients underwent an evaluation with a SCID-II. Psychiatric evaluations were performed by a research psychologist trained in administration of SCID (J.K.), who was blind to seizure type. Five of the patients who underwent evaluation for Axis II disorders were eventually diagnosed with nonepileptic seizures and were excluded from the present study. Data presented herein were obtained from the remaining 52 patients, including 21 men (mean age [±SD], 33.2±11.3 years) and 31 women (mean age 34.8±7.4 years).

For the analysis, personality disorders were divided by clusters, as outlined in DSM-III-R. Cluster A (odd/eccentric) includes schizoid, paranoid, and schizotypal personality disorders. Cluster B (dramatic/emotional) includes borderline, narcissistic, histrionic, and antisocial personality disorders. Cluster C (anxious/fearful) includes avoidant, dependent, compulsive, and passive-aggressive personality disorders. Because of the high prevalence of comorbidity among personality disorders, it has been suggested that these three clusters constitute a more fundamental diagnostic partition of pathology of the personality than do the individual disorders.¹⁷

Localization of the epileptogenic region was obtained by a standardized presurgical evaluation that included EEG telemetry, positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurocognitive testing.¹⁸ All patients underwent both baseline EEG and video-EEG telemetry using scalp and sphenoidal leads. Electroencephalographic criteria included clear localization of at least three typical seizures.

Statistical analysis of nominal variables was performed with chi-square tests, or with Fisher's exact tests when the number of expected values in at least one of the cells was less than 5. Analysis of continuous variables was obtained with unpaired two-tailed t-tests. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed when appropriate.

Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Thirty-seven patients had temporal lobe seizures (epileptogenic regions: 18 left temporal, 14 right temporal, 5 bilateral temporal). Fifteen patients were diagnosed with other types of seizures (1 absence, 2 bilateral frontal, 2 right frontal, 1 left frontal, 1 left parietal, and 8 generalized seizures of unknown origin). Patient gender and seizure type were found to be associated, the incidence of temporal lobe epilepsy being higher among women than men (Fisher's exact test, P<0.05).

For the analysis, we considered four independent seizure variables: type of seizure (i.e., temporal lobe seizures versus other types); laterality of epileptogenic region in those cases where the region was clearly localized to one side; laterality of temporal lobe seizures; and presence or absence of aura.

Eleven patients (21.15%) were diagnosed with personality disorders among this population. There was no patient with a diagnosis of Cluster A personality disorder. Cluster B was present in 3 patients (5.8%). Cluster C was the most prevalent cluster of all the Axis II diagnoses, occurring in 8 patients (15.4%) and representing 72.7% of patients with any personality disorder diagnosis. When individual personality disorders were considered, we encountered considerable comorbidity within clusters, as previously described:¹⁷ 4 of the 8 patients with Cluster C personality disorder had more than one diagnosis (3 dependent and avoidant, and 1 obsessive-compulsive and avoidant), and the other 4 patients had only one diagnosis (3 avoidant, 1 dependent). Patients with Cluster B personality disorders consisted of 2 patients with histrionic and 1 with borderline/narcissistic personality disorder. Because of the significant comorbidity, we analyzed the results by grouping the patients by clusters.

Several studies have found the prevalence of personality disorders in nonpsychiatric populations to range between 5.9% and 11.1%.^20–23 Prevalence of personality disorders in the present report is 21.15%, suggesting that epilepsy is associated with an increased prevalence of personality disorders. A limitation of the current study is the lack of matched nonepileptic controls. Matched nonepileptic control subjects and—most important—matched control subjects with other chronic disorders are needed to test more definitely for effects of epilepsy on personality and to assess if an increased prevalence of personality disorders, should it exist in such a study population, is specific to epileptic patients. In addition, it is worth mentioning that the population used for the present study was drawn from medically refractory epileptic patients. It has been shown that severity of epilepsy is associated with decreased psychosocial well-being and increased psychopathology^24–26 and that epileptic patients from outpatient clinics have less psychopathology than those studied in inpatient units, who presumably had more severe forms of epilepsy.^13,14 Therefore, results obtained in the present report do not necessarily apply to the entire epileptic population.

The most common personality disorders among our patients were Cluster C disorders, specifically dependent and avoidant personality disorders (only one patient met criteria for obsessive personality disorder). Other personality disorders, such as schizoid, paranoid, schizotypal, borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic, were not overrepresented in our sample, and we therefore suggest that epilepsy is not a risk factor for the development of these psychopathological entities.

Dependency is one of the most common psychological characteristics of patients with epilepsy.^8,9,27 Epilepsy is a disabling disorder that induces a sense of decreased control and self-efficacy, social difficulties, a perception of being stigmatized, and low self-esteem.^{25,26,28–30} From this point of view, an increase in dependency in epileptic patients might be an expected adaptive reaction to a chronic disease, and therefore not necessarily pathological.

Isolation has also been described as a social problem in epileptic patients (see review³¹), which may be consistent with our finding of avoidant personality disorder in some of the patients in our population. Therefore, the two personality disorders that are overrepresented in our sample might be accounted for by adaptation or expected reaction to psychosocial disruptions due to epilepsy. Although we expected that these psychosocial problems would be related to severity of epilepsy,³¹ we did not find a relationship between the duration of seizure disorder or frequency of seizures and these personality disorders. Again, this negative finding might be due to the small number of patients who met criteria for personality disorders in our sample.

Solely on the basis of results from the present study, we cannot rule out the possibility that Cluster C personality disorder in this population has a neuroanatomical basis. Specific lesions of the limbic system increase or decrease social cohesiveness in animals.⁹ In addition, limbic kindling in rats has been described as decreasing exploration of open arms in the elevated plus-maze test, suggesting increased fearfulness or avoidance.^32,33 A higher prevalence of Cluster C disorders (mainly avoidant and dependent) when compared with other types of personality disorders, as outlined in the present report, may thus be due to a neurobiological diathesis, psychosocial consequences induced by epilepsy, or a combination of the two. Specific studies to assess neurobiological abnormalities in patients with seizures, such as PET, might provide valuable insights that address this putative diathesis. For example, it has been reported that decreased metabolic activity in frontal and temporal cortex is positively associated with depression in patients with temporal lobe seizures, thus opening the possibility of a neurobiological substrate for psychopathology in some epileptic patients.^34,35

In the present study, the only epilepsy variable that was associated with personality disorders was epileptic aura. Other authors have described an association between auras and psychopathology.^6,36,37 Mendez et al.⁶ reported that patients with auras tended to have a predisposition to depression. Moreover, epileptic patients with personality disorders were found to have more auras, particularly cephalic type, compared with epileptic patients without personality disorders.³⁶ Mendez et al.⁶ proposed that both the auras and the interictal behavior may result from “epileptiform discharges, seizure-induced kindling of structural and behavioral changes, surround inhibition and hypometabolism, or other neurobiological phenomena,” even though these authors do not discard the possibility that the psychopathology associated with auras may also be the result of negative psychological reactions to unwelcome experiences.

We did not find a relationship between presence of personality disorders and type of seizure or age at onset. Other seizure variables, such as frequency of seizure or duration of illness, also were not associated with the presence of personality disorder, as has been previously described by investigators using other psychological instruments.^{11,27,38–40} The instrument we used to measure psychopathology (SCID for personality disorders) differed from those used in the reports previously cited. Behavioral characteristics, such as religiosity, hypergraphia, and philosophical interests, are not explored with SCID-III-R for personality disorders, and therefore they were undetected in the population studied in the present report.

It has been reported by some^1,9,12,27,41 but not all^11,38,40 investigators that patients with temporal lobe seizures (TLS) have more psychopathology than patients with other types of epilepsy. In the present study, we did not find a difference in the rates of personality disorders between patients with temporal lobe seizures and patients with other types of seizures. However, the number of non-TLS patients is relatively small in our sample (only 12), and they represent a variety of seizures disorders. Therefore, conclusive inferences cannot be made.

Hermann et al.³⁸ reported that complex partial seizures have an effect on psychopathology, but only in those patients with an onset of illness during adolescence. These authors found that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and adolescent age of onset have more psychopathology than patients with either adult or childhood onset of generalized or temporal lobe epilepsy. In the present study, we did not find a statistically significant association between age at onset and prevalence of personality disorders in patients with temporal lobe seizures.

Laterality of epileptogenic region has been correlated with the presence of psychopathology in most^8,19,39 but not all¹² studies. Using DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria, we have not found a relationship between personality disorders and laterality of the epileptogenic region, but the numbers of subjects may not be large enough to permit definitive conclusions.

In summary, the only personality disorders that were disproportionately represented in our sample were the dependent and avoidant types. The presence of these personality disorders among our patients could be the result of an altered pattern of social relationships due to the psychosocial consequences of living with refractory epilepsy (i.e., disrupted psychosocial functioning as a consequence of sense of loss of control and perception of being stigmatized), or disrupted neuronal functioning due to epileptiform discharges, or some combination of the two. Of all the epilepsy variables, the presence of aura was the only one that was associated with diagnosis of personality disorder. The presence of auras in these refractory patients was correlated with the likelihood of having a personality disorder, and therefore careful exploration by clinicians for the presence of this epilepsy variable and assessment for Axis II pathology may lead to a more comprehensive treatment intervention that takes psychopathology into account.

This work was supported by the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (grant to Dr. Altshuler). Dr. Lopez-Rodriguez was supported by a Program in Minority Research Training in Psychiatry Fellowship funded by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH19126. Dr. Engel was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grants NS02808 and NS 33310.