Skip to main content
Full access
Windows to the Brain
Published Online: 1 November 2004

Functional Imaging as a Window to Dementia: Corticobasal Degeneration

Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is a rare neurodegenerative dementia that illustrates the use of functional imaging in geriatric psychiatry. There have been numerous publications related to the more common dementias (such as Alzheimer’s disease [AD]) and functional imaging. Fewer reports are available regarding CBD; functional imaging may be cardinal in differentiating this clinical entity from other dementias and/or movement disorders. CBD typically presents with asymmetric parkinsonism, dystonia or focal myoclonus and specific cognitive-behavioral changes.1 These include one or more of the following signs: ideomotor apraxia, cortical sensory loss or alien hand phenomenon,2,3 frontal executive deficits,4,5 and, less often, dementia.6 Although first described in 1968, it was not until the early 1990s that this disorder became a focus of clinical and research interest.7 Investigators have previously referred to CBD as corticodentatonigral degeneration with neuronal achromasia, corticonigral degeneration, corticobasal ganglionic degeneration, or progressive asymmetrical rigidity and apraxia syndrome.7 Some authors have suggested using the term corticobasal syndrome for the constellation of clinical features considered as defining characteristics of corticobasal degeneration, reserving the term CBD for the histopathological disorder.8 CBD is now recognized as part of the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.2
The prevalence of this disorder is not clear. CBD is less common than other mid- and late-life basal ganglia disorders. In an autopsy series of 226 elderly demented patients, CBD accounted for 1.3% of cases.9 The mean age at onset is 63 years (SD=7.7), although the disease may occur as young as 28.2,10 The disease has an insidious onset and is steadily progressive, with a mean duration of 7.9 years (SD=2.6).2 The clinical diagnosis of CBD is challenging. This disorder may be markedly underdiagnosed, as one report indicates initial recognition to be as low as 35%.11 CBD may be difficult to differentiate in its early course from Parkinson’s disease (PD) or other parkinsonian disorders, like progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or multiple system atrophy (MSA). A lack of initial response to l-dopa therapy, although nonspecific, helps differentiate CBD from PD. Despite recommended diagnostic criteria for probable CBD, a definitive diagnosis requires neuropathological confirmation.3

Neuropsychiatric Features

Depression is the most common neuropsychiatric feature in CBD. The prevalence of depression may be as high as 70%, apathy 40%, and irritability 20%.12 Less frequently described are agitation, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety, disinhibition, delusions or aberrant motor behavior such as pacing.12,13 The cognitive changes in CBD include a unique combination of focal parietal and frontal-subcortical deficits. Most patients with CBD develop ideomotor apraxia (inability to perform previously learned movements in the absence of weakness or sensory deficits). Frontal deficits may include psychomotor slowing, a dysexecutive syndrome and impaired memory retrieval.24 Patients with CBD often have constructional and visuospatial difficulties, acalculia, elements of Gerstmann syndrome and nonfluent aphasia. This may indicate a possible overlap with progressive nonfluent aphasia.14,15 The alien limb phenomenon is a dramatic manifestation of CBD (a “feeling that one limb is foreign or ‘has a will of its own,’ together with observable involuntary motor activity”).16 In addition to CBD, several other disorders have been associated with the alien limb phenomenon: vascular insults (especially in the anterior cerebral artery territory), surgical lesions (corpus callosotomy or thalamotomy), tumors of the corpus callosum, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and AD.16
Patients with CBD may have hemispatial neglect or impaired proprioception, astereognosis, and agraphesthesia in the setting of intact primary sensory modalities, indicating cortical sensory loss.8 Balint’s syndrome—a visuospatial disorder with inability to integrate complex visual scenes (simultanagnosia), inability to accurately direct hand or other movements by visual guidance (optic ataxia), and reduced voluntary eye movements to visual stimuli (oculomotor apraxia)—may also be present.17 Alien limb sign and Balint’s syndrome can co-occur.17

Neuropathological Findings

There are no laboratory markers for CBD. A definitive diagnosis requires neuropathology. It is a “tauopathy,” diagnosed by the presence of intraneuronal tau-immunoreactive inclusions (CBD inclusions) in substantia nigra and cortical layer II.2 Astrocytic plaques and coiled bodies in oligodendroglia are characteristic. Ballooned achromatic cells are present in the involved cortex and subcortical regions.2 There are also cortical neuronal loss, gliosis of the frontoparietal and perirolandic cortices and caudate nuclei, as well as degeneration of the substantia nigra.

Structural Imaging Studies

Findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies can support the clinical diagnosis of CBD. MRI typically reveals asymmetric atrophy involving the posterior frontal and parietal regions, corresponding to the clinically notable asymmetry in motor deficits.4,5,1820 However, a recent volumetric study did not find substantial asymmetry.21 A longitudinal case report has demonstrated the progressive nature of the atrophy on imaging.22 One study has reported a hyperintense appearance of the frontoparietal white matter on diffusion weighted MRI.20 Atrophy of the basal ganglia is present less consistently.19,23 Increased T2 signal intensity in the putamen ipsilateral to the cortical atrophy and decreased T2 signal intensity bilaterally in the putamen have both been reported.5,20 Several studies have reported atrophy of the corpus callosum, predominantly in its mid portion.21,2426 In one study the degree of callosal atrophy was significantly correlated with measures of cognitive impairment.24 The authors noted that the middle predominance is consistent with degeneration in the posterior frontal and parietal cortices and thus may reflect both the severity and location of neuronal loss.

Functional Imaging Studies

In recent years, investigators have proposed functional imaging studies as diagnostic tests to help differentiate CBD from other pathologic entities. In the last 10 years, functional imaging studies in CBD have included positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Although the CBD diagnoses were rarely pathologically proven, these studies used established diagnostic criteria. Some compared CBD patients with healthy control subjects, while others contrasted them with patients with other parkinsonian or dementing disorders.
In studies utilizing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, regional cerebral metabolic rate (rCMR) was decreased most commonly in areas of frontal and parietal cortex as well as thalamus and basal ganglia (Cover and Figure 1).24,2734 Although individual patients varied considerably in the exact location and extent of deficits, primary sensorimotor cortex may be particularly affected in CBD.30,32,34 Regional asymmetries were consistently found, with more severe hypometabolism contralateral to the more affected side of the body.24,2734 However, some studies have reported symmetrical hypometabolism in the presence of asymmetrical clinical deficits or a reversed asymmetry in a few patients.27,29,32
Two studies have compared FDG PET metabolic patterns between patients with PSP, CBD and control subjects.27,32 Both used statistical parametric mapping, an image analysis technique that allows voxel by voxel comparison of groups of images after they are normalized to a standardized space. Images from the CBD groups were mirrored when necessary so that the most affected side was always the same in order to adjust for the characteristic asymmetry, thus allowing group-wise comparisons. Both studies found that metabolic asymmetry was present in most patients with CBD but not in patients with PSP. In one study, comparison between the CBD (n=12) and PSP (n=12) groups revealed a lower metabolism in the inferior parietal lobule, precuneus, and lateral occipital cortex of the more affected hemisphere in the CBD group and a lower metabolism in the anterior cingulate and medial frontal gyri of both hemispheres and the midbrain in the PSP group.27 In the other study, comparison between PSP (n=21) and CBD (n=22) groups indicated more metabolic impairment in sensorimotor, supplementary motor, and parietal cortices in the CBD group and lower metabolism in the midbrain, anterior cingulate, and orbitofrontal regions in the PSP group.32 These studies suggest that FDG PET may be useful in the differential diagnosis due to the more posterior cortical findings in CBD as compared to the more anterior cortical and midbrain findings in PSP.
Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) has been measured by SPECT in patients with CBD using several tracers including 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO), 99mTc-ethylene cysteinate dimer, and N-isopropyl-p[123I]-iodoamphetamine. The most common findings have been marked perfusion asymmetry in the posterior frontal and parietal regions, with hypoperfusion contralateral to the most affected side.22,23,3540 Other commonly affected areas are temporal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus and pontocerebellar regions.22,3640 One study reported that CBD patients with dementia had significant reductions of relative rCBF in the inferior prefrontal region of the more affected hemisphere, compared to CBD patients without dementia.40 Another found widespread decreases in absolute rCBF in patients with CBD (n=13), compared to control subjects (n=10), indicating that use of relative measures may not be fully informative in this group.36
Three studies have utilized SPECT to compare rCBF between patients with CBD and other parkinsonian or dementing disorders.3739 All three measured predetermined regions of interest. Although most regions of interest were placed in roughly similar areas (frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum) in both studies comparing patients with CBD and with PSP, the results were quite different. In a study measuring absolute rCBF, values did not differ significantly between PSP (n=12) and CBD (n=12).37 In a study measuring relative rCBF, values were significantly lower in inferior frontal, sensorimotor, and posterior parietal cortices in patients with CBD (n=6) compared to patients with PSP (n=5).39 Technique differences as well as differences in patient samples (e.g., illness duration, clinical presentation, inclusion of cognitive deficits) may be reasons why these findings are not consistent. Both studies found significantly higher asymmetry indices in CBD particularly in posterior frontal and parietal regions, similar to the differences in rCMR described previously. The third study found that rCBF was significantly lower in anterior cingulate cortex, sensorimotor cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus in patients with CBD compared to patients with AD. In contrast, rCBF was significantly lower in posterior parietal cortex in patients with AD compared to patients with CBD.38 Patients with CBD also had significantly higher asymmetry indices in inferior prefrontal and sensorimotor cortices, whereas patients with AD had significantly higher asymmetry indices in lateral and medial prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex.
Several methods have been used to image the dopamine system in CBD. Two studies utilized fluorodopa (FDOPA) PET to assess functional integrity of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum.33,34 Normally, uptake is uniform throughout caudate and putamen bilaterally. Both studies found that uptake was decreased in patients with CBD (total n=10) compared to control subjects (total n=18), particularly contralateral to the more affected side of the body (Figure 2). There was considerable variability in the distribution, with some individuals showing symmetrical decreases.33 Compared to patients with PD (n=15), patients with CBD (n=6) had more uptake (less decrease).33 A third study utilized [123I]-2β-carbomethoxy-3-β-(iodophenyl)tropane ([123I]β-CIT) SPECT, a cocaine derivative with high affinity for dopamine transporters and thus another marker of presynaptic dopaminergic neurons.41 Patients with MSA (n=18), PSP (n=8), PD (n=48), and CBD (n=4) were compared to control subjects (n=14) and each other. Overall β-CIT striatal binding was significantly reduced in all patient groups compared to control subjects, with the CBD group least affected. Asymmetry of striatal β-CIT binding was greatest in patients with CBD, but was found only in 2 of the 4. The authors concluded that β-CIT SPECT was a reliable tool for visualizing presynaptic dopaminergic lesions in patients with MSA, PSP and CBD, however it was inferior to other imaging modalities in differentiating these disorders from PD. Another SPECT tracer that binds to the dopamine transporter is [2-[[2-[[[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-yl] methyl](2-mercaptoethyl)amino]ethyl]amino]ethanethi olato(3-)-N2,N2′,S2,S2′]oxo-[1R-(exo-exo]-[99mTc]technetium ([99mTc]TRODAT-1). It has been used to compare striatal function in patients with CBD (n=5) and idiopathic PD (n=10) to control subjects (n=10) and each other.42 As was found in previously discussed studies, striatal binding was significantly reduced in both patient groups compared to control subjects. Unlike previous studies, there was no significant difference in striatal binding between the CBD and PD groups and both exhibited asymmetry. Regional analysis revealed that binding was reduced similarly in both caudate and putamen in the patients with CBD, whereas binding was relatively preserved in the caudate and decreased in the putamen in the PD patients. Postsynaptic dopaminergic D2 receptors were measured in an individual with CBD utilizing 123mI-iodobenzamide (IBZM) SPECT.35 Tracer uptake was severely reduced in the basal ganglia contralateral to the symptoms. Overall these studies indicate that the striatal dopaminergic system is impaired in CBD, but probably less severely than in other parkinsonian disorders.
One group has used fMRI to probe cortical function in patients with CBD (total n=8).22,23 Two finger opposition tasks of differing difficulty were used. In the simple task, each finger in order (starting with digit 2, the index finger) was touched to the thumb (digit 1). In the complex task a specified sequence was followed (1–2, 1–4, 1–3, 1–5). Activation of the contralateral sensorimotor, supplementary motor, and parietal cortex and of the ipsilateral prefrontal cortices occurred during the execution of the simple motor task with the unaffected hand. In contrast, decreased activation of the contralateral sensorimotor and parietal cortices and supplementary motor area occurred during performance of the same task with the affected hand (Figure 3). During performance of the complex motor task with the unaffected hand, there was bilateral activation of the sensorimotor and parietal cortices and activation of the contralateral frontal cortex. During performance of the same task with the affected hand, there was bilateral activation of the sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area, but only modest bilateral activation of the parietal cortex, particularly contralaterally (Figure 3). These results suggest parietal lobe dysfunction contralateral to the affected hand. The authors comment that the parietal lobe participates in the motor control of movements in the intrapersonal space. There are connections between the inferior parietal lobe and inferior premotor area (which may store elementary motor programs). Thus, parietal lobe dysfunction can disconnect the supplementary motor, premotor, and sensorimotor areas. The authors propose that fMRI can provide evidence of asymmetrical disorganization of the hierarchical cortical motor program, before structural and even SPECT changes become evident.
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides a relative measure of particular metabolites, most commonly presented as spectra of the amount of signal produced by each from a volume of interest (voxel) rather than as images. Three studies have utilized proton (1H) MRS to examine patients with CBD and related diseases (PSP, PD, MSA, vascular parkinsonism, primary progressive aphasia, frontotemporal dementia).4345 With 1H MRS the metabolites of interest are N-acetyl aspartate, choline, and creatine. N-Acetyl aspartate is present almost exclusively within neurons and indicates neuronal/axonal density. Choline is mostly present within membrane constituents and can be elevated both as a result of increased synthesis and destruction. Creatine is present alone and as part of phosphocreatinine, both of which are important for energy metabolism. While this peak is normally quite stable and commonly used as a reference standard, it does change in some conditions. The only region included in all 3 studies was the basal ganglia. Although the voxel placement varied, all reported either decreased N-acetyl aspartate/creatine or decreased N-acetyl aspartate/choline.4345 Two studies found decreased N-acetyl aspartate/creatine in frontal cortex.44,45 Other areas reported to be affected include the centrum semiovale, parietal cortex, and perisylvian cortex. The factors that differentiated CBD from other entities (e.g., PSP, MSA, frontotemporal dementia) were marked asymmetry and perhaps involvement of parietal cortex.
In summary, the most salient findings in these functional imaging studies are asymmetrical hypoperfusion on SPECT and asymmetrical hypometabolism on PET involving the parietofrontal cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus. These findings suggest that multiple components of neural networks related to both movement execution and production of skilled movements are disturbed in CBD.32 The functional imaging results may confirm a clinical diagnosis of probable CBD and support the diagnosis in patients who do not fulfill sufficient clinical criteria.46 The few reports looking at CBD using fMRI and MRS appear to support the presence of hemispheric asymmetry early in the disease.

Conclusions

In conclusion, CBD is a neurodegenerative dementia with abnormal movements and focal behavioral manifestations. The clinical diagnosis is difficult to make in the absence of pathological findings. Functional imaging studies may be very helpful in demonstrating asymmetrical abnormalities in frontoparietal regions, basal ganglia, and thalamus contralateral to clinical symptoms, particularly in the early stages.46 Future studies are needed to replicate present findings. Comparison with other patient groups, such as PSP and PD, will be particularly important. Although an uncommon form of dementia, CBD exemplifies the future possibilities of functional imaging in the clinical evaluation of dementing illnesses.
Figure 1. Cover and  Statistical parametric map displaying regions of significant hypometabolism superimposed on a three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images and selected axial images from the source positron emission tomography 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose data set in a patient with corticobasal degeneration. Note the prominent asymmetrical metabolic decreases in the occipital and parietal lobes (arrows).
Figure 1. Cover and  Statistical parametric map displaying regions of significant hypometabolism superimposed on a three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images and selected axial images from the source positron emission tomography 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose data set in a patient with corticobasal degeneration. Note the prominent asymmetrical metabolic decreases in the occipital and parietal lobes (arrows).
FIGURE 2.  [18F]Fluorodopa (FDOPA) positron emission tomography images in a normal subject and three patients with corticobasal degeneration show decreased uptake of FDOPA in the corticobasal degeneration group in the striatum (arrows) as well as the clearly asymmetric pattern (used with permission (34).
FIGURE 3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging results of finger opposition tasks in a patient with corticobasal degeneration are overlaid onto axial magnetic resonance images. There are clear differences in cortical activation when movement is performed with the impaired (pink) and the unaffected (green) hands. Note the decreased areas and extent of activation with the affected hand with a simple (left) and complex (right) task (adapted with permission (23).

References

1.
Wenning GK, Litvan I, Jankovic J, et al: Natural history and survival of 14 patients with corticobasal degeneration confirmed at postmortem examination. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64:184–189
2.
Mendez MF, Cummings JL: Dementia. A Clinical Approach, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003
3.
Cummings JL: The Neuropsychiatry of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. London, Martin Dunitz, 2003
4.
Soliveri P, Monza D, Paridi D, et al: Cognitive and magnetic resonance imaging aspects of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 1999; 53:502–507
5.
Frasson E, Moretto G, Beltramello A, et al: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates in corticobasal degeneration. Ital J Neurol Sci 1998; 19:321–328
6.
Grimes DA, Lang AE, Bergeron CB: Dementia as the most common presentation of cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. Neurology 1999; 53:1969–1974
7.
Rebeiz JJ, Kolodny EH, Richardson EP Jr: Corticodentatonigral degeneration with neuronal achromasia. Arch Neurol 1968; 18:20–33
8.
Boeve BF, Lang A, Litvan I: Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 2003; 54(suppl 5):S15-S19
9.
Volicer L, McKee A, Hewitt S: Dementia. Neurol Clin 2001; 19:867–885
10.
DePold Hohler A, Ransom BR, Chun MR, et al: The youngest reported case of corticobasal ganglia degeneration. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2003; 10:47–50
11.
Litvan I, Agid Y, Goetz C, et al: Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration: a clinicopathologic study. Neurology 1997; 48:119–125
12.
Cummings JL, Litvan I: Neuropsychiatric aspects of corticobasal degeneration. Adv Neurol 2000; 82:147–152
13.
Litvan I, Cummings JL, Mega M: Neuropsychiatric features of corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65:717–721
14.
Kertesz A, Martinez-Lage P, Davidson W, et al: The corticobasal degeneration syndrome overlaps progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2000; 55:1368–1375
15.
Graham NL, Bak TH, Hodges JR: Corticobasal degeneration as a cognitive disorder. Mov Disord 2003; 18:1224–1232
16.
Hanna P, Doody R: Alien limb sign. Adv Neurol 2000; 82:135–145
17.
Mendez MF: Corticobasal ganglionic degeneration with Balint’s syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 12:273–275
18.
Monza D, Ciano C, Scaioli V, et al: Neurophysiological features in relation to clinical signs in clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration. Neurol Sci 2003; 24:16–23
19.
Savoiardo M, Grisoli M, Girotti F: Magnetic resonance imaging in CBD, related atypical parkinsonian disorders, and dementias. Adv Neurol 2000; 82:197–208
20.
Ikeda K, Iwasaki Y, Ichikawa Y: Cognitive and MRI aspects of corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy (letter). Neurology 2000; 54:1878
21.
Groschel K, Hauser TK, Luft A, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetry differentiates progressive supranuclear palsy from corticobasal degeneration. Neuroimage 2004; 21:714–724
22.
Moretti R, Ukmar M, Torre P, et al: Cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration: a clinical, functional and cognitive evaluation (1-year follow-up). J Neurol Sci 2000; 182:29–35
23.
Ukmar M, Moretti R, Torre P, et al: Corticobasal degeneration: structural and functional MRI and single-photon emission computed tomography. Neuroradiology 2003; 45:708–712
24.
Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Nagahama Y, et al: Atrophy of the corpus callosum, cortical hypometabolism, and cognitive impairment in corticobasal degeneration. Arch Neurol 1998; 55:609–614
25.
Wolters A, Classen J, Kunesch E, et al: Measurements of transcallosally mediated cortical inhibition for differentiating parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord 2004; 19:518–528
26.
Trompetto C, Buccolieri A, Marchese R, et al: Impairment of transcallosal inhibition in patients with corticobasal degeneration. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2181–2187
27.
Hosaka K, Ishii K, Sakamoto S, et al: Voxel-based comparison of regional cerebral metabolism between PSP and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Sci 2002; 199:67–71
28.
Ishii K: Clinical application of PET for diagnosis of dementia. Ann Nucl Med 2002; 16:515–525
29.
Taniwaki T, Yamada T, Yoshida T, et al: Heterogeneity of glucose metabolism in corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Sci 1998; 161:70–76
30.
Hirono N, Ishii K, Sasaki M, et al: Features of regional cerebral glucose metabolism abnormality in corticobasal degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11:139–146
31.
Lutte I, Laterre C, Bodart JM, et al: Contribution of PET studies in diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Eur Neurol 2000; 44:12–21
32.
Garraux G, Salmon E, Peigneux P, et al: Voxel-based distribution of metabolic impairment in corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord 2000; 15:894–904
33.
Laureys S, Salmon E, Garraux G, et al: Fluorodopa uptake and glucose metabolism in early stages of corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol 1999; 246:1151–1158
34.
Nagasawa H, Tanji H, Nomura H, et al: PET study of cerebral glucose metabolism and fluorodopa uptake in patients with corticobasal ganglia degeneration. J Neurol Sci 1996; 139:210–217
35.
Frisoni GB, Pizzolato G, Zanetti O, et al: Corticobasal degeneration: neuropsychological assessment and dopamine D2 receptor SPECT analysis. Eur Neurol 1995; 35:50–54
36.
Hossain AK, Murata Y, Zhang L, et al: Brain perfusion SPECT in patients with corticobasal degeneration: analysis using statistical parametric mapping. Mov Disord 2003; 18:697–703
37.
Zhang L, Murata Y, Ishida R, et al: Differentiating between progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration by brain perfusion SPET. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22:767–772
38.
Okuda B, Tachibana H, Kawabata K, et al: Comparison of brain perfusion in corticobasal degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2001; 12:226–231
39.
Okuda B, Tachibana H, Kawabata K, et al: Cerebral blood flow in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2000; 14:46–52
40.
Okuda B, Tachibana H, Kawabata K, et al: Cerebral blood flow correlates of higher brain dysfunctions in corticobasal degeneration. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999; 12:189–193
41.
Pirker W, Asenbaum S, Bencsits G, et al: [123I]β-CIT SPECT in multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord 2000; 15:1158–1167
42.
Lai SC, Weng YH, Yen TC, et al: Imaging early-stage corticobasal degeneration with [99mTc]TRODAT-1 SPET. Nucl Med Commun 2004; 25:339–345
43.
Tedeschi G, Litvan I, Bonavita S, et al: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in progressive supranuclear palsy, Parkinson’s disease and corticobasal degeneration. Brain 1997; 120:1541–1552
44.
Abe K, Terakawa H, Takanashi M, et al: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of patients with parkinsonism. Brain Res Bull 2000; 52:589–595
45.
Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T: Proton chemical shift imaging in Pick complex. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:1387–1392
46.
Coulier IM, de Vries JJ, Leenders KL: Is FDG-PET a useful tool in clinical practice for diagnosing corticobasal ganglia degeneration? Mov Disord 2003; 18:1175–1178

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Pages: 393 - 399
PubMed: 15616165

History

Published online: 1 November 2004
Published in print: November 2004

Authors

Details

Andreea L. Seritan, M.D.
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, California (A.L.S.); the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (M.F.M.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (D.H.S.S.); the Mental Health Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.A.H.); the Research and Education Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (K.H.T.); and the School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas (K.H.T). Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, NC 28144; [email protected] (E-mail).
Mario F. Mendez, M.D., Ph.D.
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, California (A.L.S.); the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (M.F.M.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (D.H.S.S.); the Mental Health Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.A.H.); the Research and Education Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (K.H.T.); and the School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas (K.H.T). Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, NC 28144; [email protected] (E-mail).
Daniel H.S. Silverman, M.D., Ph.D.
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, California (A.L.S.); the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (M.F.M.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (D.H.S.S.); the Mental Health Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.A.H.); the Research and Education Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (K.H.T.); and the School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas (K.H.T). Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, NC 28144; [email protected] (E-mail).
Robin A. Hurley, M.D.
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, California (A.L.S.); the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (M.F.M.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (D.H.S.S.); the Mental Health Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.A.H.); the Research and Education Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (K.H.T.); and the School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas (K.H.T). Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, NC 28144; [email protected] (E-mail).
Katherine H. Taber, Ph.D.
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, California (A.L.S.); the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (M.F.M.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California (D.H.S.S.); the Mental Health Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (R.A.H.); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.A.H.); the Research and Education Service Line, Salisbury Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina (K.H.T.); and the School of Health Information Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas (K.H.T). Address correspondence to Dr. Robin Hurley, Hefner VA Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, NC 28144; [email protected] (E-mail).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share