Payment-Related Lawsuits Can Often Be Averted
When patients will not or cannot pay for treatment, psychiatrists should be aware that there are liability risks associated with the decision to pursue an outstanding balance.
One risk is that a patient will retaliate by filing a lawsuit claiming that his or her psychiatrist engaged in some type of unprofessional conduct, according to risk management experts with Professional Risk Management Services Inc. (PRMS), which manages the APA-endorsed liability insurance program, known as the Psychiatrists' Professional Liability Insurance Program.
Counter-Claims Common
“The most common type of lawsuit to result from pursuing a collection is a counter-claim from the patient alleging that the services were not provided at all or that the patient was so dissatisfied with the level of service that no fee should be charged or collected,” said Denny Rodriguez, J.D., a litigation specialist with PRMS.
It is far more common for a patient to retaliate by filing a complaint with the psychiatrist's state licensure board or professional membership organization, which is better known as an administrative action, according to Rodriguez.
Complaints are also sometimes lodged with health care organizations and managed care companies with which the physician is affiliated, Rodriguez pointed out.
In an administrative action, patients may allege that the physician conducted himself or herself unprofessionally and should be sanctioned for that behavior, said Marynell Hinton, M.A., a senior risk manager with PRMS.
Hinton noted that administrative actions are relatively easy for patients to initiate. Since many professional membership organizations, for instance, have a greater goal of serving patients, they “are likely to have complaint forms readily available for patients to fill out and procedures in place for reviewing a member's standing within the organization,” she said.
She also noted that administrative actions “are not designed to be fair in a way that lawsuits are designed to be fair” and that physicians are automatically at a disadvantage in such a proceeding because “the patient does not have to prove negligence and damages” in an administrative action as he or she would in a malpractice lawsuit.
Until the patient's allegations underlying an administrative action are proved false, the costs to the psychiatrist are many and may include money and time spent fighting the claims, as well as sleepless nights, Hinton remarked.
She pointed out that health care organizations often have specific rules and procedures with regard to collection proceedings taken against patients, and psychiatrists should consult those guidelines before attempting to collect overdue bills.
For instance, the American Hospital Association in 2003 released a set of guidelines on collection practices for hospitals. The guidelines address patients' need for financial counseling and assistance, among other issues.
Tips for Psychiatrists
Hinton and Rodriguez offered some tips to psychiatrists, which though seemingly obvious, are not always considered by psychiatrists who decide to pursue outstanding bills. The information appears in the Fall 2004 “Rx for Risk” newsletter from PRMS.
Among them are the following:
•
Payment policies and procedures regarding collections should be given to all patients during the first treatment session.
•
Outstanding balances should be addressed as soon as they arise.
•
The decision to pursue an outstanding balance must be made by the psychiatrist who treated the patient and never a member of the office staff or a billing agency contracted by the psychiatrist to collect payments.
•
When disclosing information to a collection agency, the patient's confidentiality must be first and foremost in the psychiatrist's mind. Psychiatrists should disclose only the minimum amount of information necessary to collect in order to avoid breaching a patient's confidentiality.
•
Covered providers under the privacy rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act should have business-associate agreements in place with collections agencies or attorneys who are hired to collect on outstanding bills.
The American Hospital Association's 2003 guidelines, “Hospital Billing and Collection Practices,” are posted online at<www.hospitalconnect.com/aha/key_issues/bcp/content/guidelinesfinalweb.pdf>.▪
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 21 January 2005
Published in print: January 21, 2005
Notes
To clear up confusion and decrease liability risks, psychiatrists should make available to patients at the outset of treatment their policies on overdue bills.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).