Skip to main content
No access
Article
Published Online: March 1953

AN EVALUATION OF INTRAVENOUS ETHER AS A TREATMENT FOR PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS

Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

1. Seventy-three committed patients diagnosed as having affective psychoses were divided at random into 3 treatment groups: one group received intravenous ether, one group intravenous saline, and a third group electric shock treatment.
2. Of the 37 patients who received intravenous ether 37.8% were scored as "improved"; 52.9% of the 17 patients who received intravenous saline were scored as "improved"; and 89.4% of the 19 patients who received electric shock treatment were so scored. A comparison of the results obtained following intravenous ether and intravenous saline showed statistically no significant difference. The improvement following electric shock treatment was significantly higher than that obtained following either intravenous ether or intravenous saline.
3. Twenty-two of the patients who failed to improve with intravenous ether were then given electric shock treatment, and 19 of these improved sufficiently to leave the hospital; 7 of the patients who failed to improve with intravenous saline were then given electric shock treatment and all 7 improved sufficiently to leave the hospital. A comparison of the results obtained by electric shock treatment alone with those obtained by a combination of ether and electric shock or saline and electric shock showed no differences considered significant by statistical methods.
4. Autonomic nervous system tests(6) showed that patients whose autonomic reaction was classified as "favorable" as far as electric shock treatment was concerned showed a higher rate of improvement with ether than did patients whose autonomic reaction would indicate a poor prognosis with electric shock treatment. However, the improvement rate in the "favorable" autonomic group cases was poor as compared with the expected improvement rate of similar cases treated with electric shock treatment.
5. It is concluded that intravenous ether as a treatment for affective psychoses showed no specific treatment effect that could not be obtained by intravenous saline, and that electric shock treatment was a much more efficacious treatment than ether in such cases.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 650 - 656
PubMed: 13030829

History

Published in print: March 1953
Published online: 1 April 2006

Authors

Details

DANIEL H. FUNKENSTEIN
The Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and the Boston Psychopathic Hospital.
LYDIA W. MEADE
The Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and the Boston Psychopathic Hospital.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share