Alterations in Brain Structures Related to Taste Reward Circuitry in Ill and Recovered Anorexia Nervosa and in Bulimia Nervosa
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective
The pathophysiology of anorexia nervosa remains obscure, but structural brain alterations could be functionally important biomarkers. The authors assessed taste pleasantness and reward sensitivity in relation to brain structure, which may be related to food avoidance commonly seen in eating disorders.
Method
The authors used structural MR imaging to study gray and white matter volumes in women with current restricting-type anorexia nervosa (N=19), women recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa (N=24), women with bulimia nervosa (N=19), and healthy comparison women (N=24).
Results
All eating disorder groups exhibited increased gray matter volume of the medial orbitofrontal cortex (gyrus rectus). Manual tracing confirmed larger gyrus rectus volume, and volume predicted taste pleasantness ratings across all groups. Analyses also indicated other morphological differences between diagnostic categories. Antero-ventral insula gray matter volumes were increased on the right side in the anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa groups and on the left side in the bulimia nervosa group relative to the healthy comparison group. Dorsal striatum volumes were reduced in the recovered anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa groups and predicted sensitivity to reward in all three eating disorder groups. The eating disorder groups also showed reduced white matter in right temporal and parietal areas relative to the healthy comparison group. The results held when a range of covariates, such as age, depression, anxiety, and medications, were controlled for.
Conclusion
Brain structure in the medial orbitofrontal cortex, insula, and striatum is altered in eating disorders and suggests altered brain circuitry that has been associated with taste pleasantness and reward value.
Restricting-type anorexia nervosa is a severe eating disorder associated with malnutrition, underweight, and high mortality. It is distinct from bulimia nervosa, which is characterized by regular binge eating and purging episodes but normal weight. Both disorders usually begin during adolescence, occur most commonly in females, and aggregate in families.
Functional brain imaging has implicated the striatum, insula, anterior cingulate, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex in eating disorders (1). The underlying mechanisms for alterations in these structures are unclear, but gray and white matter may be directly related to altered brain function and behavior (2).
Findings from research on brain structure in eating disorders have been inconsistent. Early studies suggested reduced total gray and white matter volume, and studies in patients who had recovered from eating disorders found reduced or normal total brain tissue volumes (3). For the study of regionally specific volume alterations, brain analysis methods have become available that allow automated whole-brain comparison, reducing bias (3). A systematic review (3) found eight such studies in adults, and another has been published since (4). Those studies suggested reduced gray matter volume in anorexia nervosa in the insula, frontal operculum, and occipital, medial temporal, or cingulate cortex, and one recent study found increased gray matter volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (5–8). After short-term recovery, individuals with anorexia nervosa have shown reduced gray matter in the insula, striatum, and occipital, frontal, and parietal cortex (8), but brain tissue seems to increase with weight gain (9) and has been shown to be normal after long-term recovery (10). The few studies in patients with bulimia nervosa suggested normal or increased localized gray matter volume in the orbitofrontal cortex and striatum (4, 6). These variable results may reflect the heterogeneity of approaches. Only some studies corrected for age or overall brain volumes; some studies distinguished the restricting type from the binge eating and purging type of anorexia nervosa while others did not; and the effects of comorbid diagnoses or medication were often not directly taken into account.
Individuals ill with and recovered from anorexia nervosa show increased eating concerns, as do individuals with bulimia nervosa between binge episodes (11). Notably, affective value attributed both to food stimuli and to food avoidance (12) has been associated with medial orbitofrontal cortex function (13). Furthermore, orbitofrontal cortex function has been directly associated with taste pleasantness (14), which could have implications for sensory-specific satiety in eating disorders and being quickly overstimulated by a food type. Orbitofrontal function has been repeatedly associated with brain pathology in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, including in studies using food valence ratings (13, 15, 16), and could be a key area of brain pathology in eating disorders. On the other hand, brain reward function indicated opposite response in the striatum and insula in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa (17, 18), and those regions might therefore distinguish eating disorder groups.
Methodological problems in eating disorders brain research can include inaccurate brain alignment or separation of gray and white matter in imaging as a result of brain shapes that do not conform with standard brain templates. Whole-brain structural studies in eating disorders have most commonly used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and statistical parametric mapping software (SPM; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/), which analyze gray and white matter probability across the entire brain. Recently the VBM8 toolbox was developed to address shortcomings of the previous versions. It uses a new image registration algorithm and a template based on the individual study population without relying on standard template assumptions, and it shows improved separation of gray and white matter compared with previous VBM versions (19, 20).
In this study, we wanted to compare individuals ill with and recovered from anorexia nervosa to identify potential trait alterations in the disorder, but also to compare individuals with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in order to identify brain alterations across eating disorders. We expected the orbitofrontal cortex to show common abnormalities across all eating disorder groups, possibly related to hedonic taste perception (13, 16), and we expected insula and striatum structures to differentiate the eating disorder types (3, 17).
Method
Participants
Nineteen women with restricting-type anorexia, 24 recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa, and 20 with bulimia nervosa, as well as 24 age-matched healthy comparison women, participated in the study. Participants in the eating disorder groups were recruited from the Children’s Hospital Colorado and the Eating Disorders Center of Denver. The study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. Participants in the eating disorder groups were within 1–2 weeks of closely supervised inpatient or partial hospitalization treatment and followed the program meal plan to avoid acute effects of starvation and dehydration (see the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). Women in the healthy comparison group and those in the recovered anorexia nervosa group were recruited through local advertisements. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (21) was administered by a doctoral-level interviewer. Women in the recovered group had a history of restricting-type anorexia nervosa but had normal weight for height, menstrual cycle, exercise, and food intake for at least 1 year. All participants were right-handed, with no history of head trauma, neurological disease, major medical illness, psychosis, or substance use disorders. Thirteen women in the healthy comparison group, one in the anorexia nervosa group, five in the bulimia nervosa group, and seven in the recovered group took birth control pills. All participants provided written informed consent after receiving a complete description of the study.
Behavioral Measures
Participants completed the Eating Disorder Inventory–3, the Temperament and Character Inventory, the Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory–II, and the Revised Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment Questionnaire. In addition, participants completed a taste perception test prior to brain imaging in which they rated a 1-molar sucrose solution for sweetness and pleasantness on 9-point Likert scales (see the online data supplement).
MRI Acquisition and Image Analysis
Structural brain images were acquired on a GE Signa 3-T scanner, with axial three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (spoiled gradient recall [SPGR], field of view=22 cm, flip angle=10°, slice thickness=1.2 mm, scan matrix=256×256, TR=10 ms, TE=3 ms, voxel size=1.2 mm3).
Images were manually aligned on the anterior-posterior commissure line. Preprocessing of T1-weighted images was performed using the SPM VBM8 toolbox (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/vbm/download/) in MATLAB R2009b, 7.9.0 (MathWorks, Natick, Mass.).
VBM8 brain segmentation (see the online data supplement) does not require a priori tissue probabilities information. After segmentation of T1/SPGR images into three pure tissue classes (gray matter, white matter, and CSF), two additional mixed tissue classes (gray matter-white matter and gray matter-CSF) are estimated using partial volume effects. The result is an estimation of fraction of pure tissue type present in every voxel. Images were smoothed to an 8-mm full-width at half-maximum Gaussian kernel. Nonlinear modulated data were used in the analyses. Images were normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using high-dimensional diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated Lie algebra (DARTEL).
Total intracranial volume (global tissue volume) was obtained by adding up gray and white matter and CSF volumes from the tissue class images in native space using the VBM8 toolbox.
To confirm VBM results for orbitofrontal gyrus rectus volume, the left gyrus rectus gray matter was traced using MRIcron (by M.E.S., blind to group) (http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/mricro/mricron/) from the most inferior orbitofrontal brain slice to the level of the inferior rostral sulcus as the superior border to include the functionally connected agranular and dysgranular layers, and between the olfactory sulcus as the lateral boundary and the medial longitudinal fissure as the medial boundary (22).
Statistical Analysis
A general linear model whole-brain analysis was used (SPM8), comprising a factorial design with group as a factor with four levels (healthy comparison group, anorexia nervosa group, recovered anorexia nervosa group, and bulimia nervosa group) and age and total intracranial volume as covariates, as well as use of antipsychotics or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and comorbid depression or anxiety (each coded 0 or 1 for presence or absence, respectively). Initially, a voxel-wise F test was performed with a significance threshold of 0.001 uncorrected and an extent threshold of 50 voxels to include functionally relevant brain structures, such as the insula taste area and the orbitofrontal cortex. We used anatomical regions defined by the SPM8 Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas (orbitofrontal cortex, insula, caudate, putamen) for small-volume correction (family-wise error corrected p<0.05). Gray matter regional volumes that reached significance within the anatomical region were extracted using the MarsBaR region-of-interest toolbox (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/) for post hoc analysis. Similarly, significant white matter regional volumes from the group whole-brain analysis were also extracted. Demographic and extracted regional brain volumes were analyzed using SPSS (IBM-SPSS, Chicago) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc group comparisons were analyzed with Dunnett’s T3, and ANOVA with covariates (ANCOVA) used Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparison, verified using bootstrap procedures. Regression analyses assessed relationships between behavioral measures and brain volumes.
Results
The participants’ demographic and behavioral data are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in mean age between the eating disorder groups and the healthy comparison group, but participants in the recovered anorexia nervosa group were older on average than those in the anorexia nervosa group.
| Variablea | A. Comparison Group (N=24) | B. Anorexia Nervosa Group (N=19) | C. Recovered Anorexia Nervosa Group (N=24) | D. Bulimia Nervosa Group (N=20) | Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | Comparisonb | |||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Age (years) | 27.4 | 6.3 | 23.1 | 5.8 | 30.3 | 8.1 | 25.2 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 0.004 | B<C** |
| Body mass index | 21.6 | 1.3 | 16.0 | 1.1 | 20.8 | 2.4 | 22.6 | 5.7 | 17.4 | <0.001 | A, C, D>B*** |
| Education (years) | 16.6 | 2.1 | 14.5 | 2.4 | 16.9 | 2.7 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 0.020 | A, C>B* |
| Novelty seeking | 17.9 | 5.2 | 13.7 | 6.7 | 18.1 | 6.1 | 22.1 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 0.001 | B<D** |
| Harm avoidance | 9.6 | 4.0 | 23.7 | 5.4 | 15.5 | 6.5 | 23.0 | 5.8 | 32.6 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C**, B>C***, C<D*** |
| Reward dependence | 17.0 | 3.7 | 15.2 | 2.9 | 18.2 | 2.7 | 16.0 | 4.7 | 2.9 | 0.037 | C>B** |
| Depression | 1.1 | 0.9 | 24.4 | 10.6 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 24.5 | 11.3 | 57.5 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C**, B, D>C*** |
| Drive for thinness | 2.6 | 3.4 | 19.2 | 6.7 | 8.5 | 6.4 | 23.1 | 4.5 | 66.7 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C**, B>C***, C<D*** |
| Bulimia | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 22.7 | 5.3 | 182.2 | <0.001 | A<D***, A<B*, B<D***, C<D*** |
| Body dissatisfaction | 4.4 | 4.3 | 24.4 | 9.3 | 10.5 | 8.1 | 30.7 | 8.0 | 56.6 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C*, B>C***, C<D*** |
| Punishment sensitivity | 4.4 | 2.8 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 3.3 | 8.4 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 0.002 | A<D** |
| Reward sensitivity | 4.0 | 1.9 | 13.2 | 4.2 | 6.6 | 4.1 | 12.4 | 3.9 | 32.5 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C*, B>C***, C<D*** |
| State anxiety | 32.7 | 11.8 | 50.4 | 9.7 | 45.0 | 9.4 | 47.8 | 12.8 | 11.5 | <0.001 | A<B, C, D*** |
| Trait anxiety | 33.9 | 11.4 | 51.7 | 9.7 | 43.6 | 6.9 | 56.0 | 10.9 | 21.5 | <0.001 | A<B, D***, A<C**, B>C*, C<D*** |
| Sucrose sweetness | 8.33 | 0.16 | 8.88 | 0.19 | 8.17 | 0.16 | 8.70 | 0.17 | 3.6 | 0.017 | B>C* |
| Sucrose pleasantness | 4.92 | 0.05 | 4.19 | 0.62 | 4.63 | 0.51 | 5.45 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.477 | |
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | ||||
| Medication use | |||||||||||
| SSRI | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 31.6 | 5 | 20.1 | 9 | 45.0 | |||
| Atypical antipsychotic | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| SSRI and atypical antipsychotic | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 10.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 20.0 | |||
| Comorbid diagnoses | |||||||||||
| Major depression | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 10.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 20.0 | |||
| Anxiety disorder | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 21.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 30.0 | |||
| Major depression and anxiety disorder | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 31.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 30.0 | |||
a
SSRI=selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
b
Significance is based on the Dunnett T3 post hoc test.
* p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001.
Body mass index (BMI) was lower in the anorexia nervosa group. Measures for eating pathology, mood, and anxiety as well as reward sensitivity were typically elevated in the eating disorder groups. Ratings of sucrose pleasantness were similar across groups, but sweetness rating was greater in the anorexia nervosa group compared with the recovered anorexia nervosa group.
Total brain volume was similar across groups (Table 2). Gray matter results (Figures 1 and 2 and Table 2) indicated increased gyrus rectus volume in all eating disorder groups, reduced caudate and putamen volume in the bulimia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa groups, and increased insula volume in the eating disorder groups relative to the healthy comparison group.
| Anatomical Region | Montreal Neurological Institute Coordinates | A. Comparison Group | B. Anorexia Nervosa Group | C. Recovered Anorexia Nervosa Group | D. Bulimia Nervosa Group | Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | p | Comparisonb | ||
| Whole-brain volumes | ||||||||||||
| Gray matter volume (cm3) | 629.7 | 62.1 | 651.8 | 37.9 | 639.4 | 49.5 | 662.4 | 40.6 | 1.8 | 0.149 | ||
| White matter volume (cm3) | 494.0 | 44.3 | 503.8 | 41.0 | 493.0 | 56.3 | 503.3 | 68.2 | 0.3 | 0.856 | ||
| CSF volume (cm3) | 226.8 | 30.6 | 246.3 | 33.1 | 226.5 | 26.6 | 233.2 | 28.0 | 2.0 | 0.118 | ||
| Total intracranial volume (cm3) | 1,350.5 | 105.3 | 1,402.0 | 71.6 | 1,358.8 | 107.0 | 1,398.9 | 117.8 | 1.5 | 0.232 | ||
| Regional gray matter volumes | ||||||||||||
| Left orbitofrontal cortex | x=–6, y=29, z=–26 | 0.479 | 0.071 | 0.553 | 0.091 | 0.538 | 0.066 | 0.585 | 0.072 | 7.9 | <0.001 | B>A*, D>A***, C>A* |
| Right anterior ventral insula | x=30, y=14, z=–12 | 0.704 | 0.079 | 0.806 | 0.084 | 0.754 | 0.084 | 0.777 | 0.104 | 5.3 | 0.002 | B>A*** |
| Right anterior, middle insula | x=42, y=9, z=4 | 0.597 | 0.058 | 0.679 | 0.066 | 0.645 | 0.063 | 0.630 | 0.069 | 6.1 | 0.001 | B>A***, C>A* |
| Left anterior ventral insula | x=–29, y=12, z=–17 | 0.703 | 0.059 | 0.753 | 0.077 | 0.729 | 0.066 | 0.769 | 0.070 | 4.0 | 0.011 | D>A** |
| Right dorsal caudate | x=21, y=–3, z=19 | 0.173 | 0.019 | 0.170 | 0.017 | 0.153 | 0.018 | 0.147 | 0.021 | 10.2 | <0.001 | A>D***, A>C**, B>D**, B>C* |
| Left dorsal caudate | x=–20, y=–3, z=18 | 0.308 | 0.027 | 0.295 | 0.032 | 0.281 | 0.034 | 0.270 | 0.036 | 5.7 | 0.001 | A>D**, A>C* |
| Right dorsal putamen | x=20, y=0, z=12 | 0.173 | 0.013 | 0.168 | 0.016 | 0.157 | 0.017 | 0.151 | 0.015 | 9.2 | <0.001 | A>D***, A>C***, B>D** |
| Right dorsal putamen | x=23, y=0, z=15 | 0.088 | 0.008 | 0.086 | 0.009 | 0.080 | 0.009 | 0.076 | 0.008 | 9.1 | <0.001 | A>D***, A>C**, B>D** |
| Regional white matter volumes | ||||||||||||
| Right medial temporal lobe | x=27, y=–19, z=–5 | 0.770 | 0.057 | 0.754 | 0.052 | 0.727 | 0.056 | 0.713 | 0.044 | 5.3 | 0.002 | A>D** |
| Right inferior temporal lobe | x=57, y=–20, z=–21 | 0.594 | 0.047 | 0.585 | 0.046 | 0.565 | 0.044 | 0.546 | 0.034 | 9.3 | <0.001 | A>B**, A>C***, D<B**, D<C** |
| Right inferior parietal lobe | x=55, y=–48, z=35 | 0.347 | 0.065 | 0.353 | 0.081 | 0.278 | 0.056 | 0.285 | 0.056 | 8.0 | <0.001 | A>D**, A>C**, B>D*, B>C** |
| Manually traced volume | ||||||||||||
| Gyrus rectus volume (mm3) | 868 | 247 | 1,128 | 438 | 1,205 | 384 | 1,282 | 449 | 5.1 | 0.003 | A<B*, C**, D*** | |
a
Whole-brain volumes are listed in cubic centimeters. Values for regional brain volumes are fractions of the respective brain tissue type per volume.
b
Significance is based on the Dunnett T3 post hoc test.
* p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001.
FIGURE 1. Areas of Significant Group Differences Between Healthy Comparison and Eating Disorder Groupsa
a Eating disorder groups were anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa. Green indicates gray matter differences and red indicates white matter differences.
FIGURE 2. Areas of Significant Gray Matter Differences Across Healthy Comparison and Eating Disorder Groupsa
a Eating disorder groups were anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa.
An ANCOVA of manually traced gyrus rectus volume (with total intracranial volume as a covariate) confirmed increased volume in the eating disorder groups relative to the healthy comparison group (Table 2).
White matter results (Figure 1, Table 2) showed reduced inferior temporal white matter in the anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa groups relative to the healthy comparison group, reduced inferior parietal volume in the bulimia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa groups, and reduced medial temporal lobe white matter in the bulimia nervosa group relative to the healthy comparison group.
Results of the regression analyses indicated that age was negatively correlated with gray matter volumes in the healthy comparison group for the right insula (x=30, y=14, y=−12; r=−0.437, p<0.033) and the left gyrus rectus (r=−0.411, p<0.048), in the anorexia nervosa group for the left gyrus rectus (r=−0.830, p<0.001) and the right putamen (r=−0.473, p<0.041), and in the recovered anorexia nervosa group for the left gyrus rectus (r=−0.453, p<0.026).
BMI was negatively correlated with volume in the bulimia nervosa group for the right caudate (r=−0.473, p<0.035) and in the recovered anorexia nervosa group for the left insula gray matter (r=−0.510, p<0.011).
State (r=−0.441, p<0.031) and trait (r=−0.419, p<0.042) anxiety were negatively correlated with left anterior ventral insula gray matter volume in the healthy comparison group but not in the eating disorder groups.
Sensitivity to reward was positively correlated with right putamen gray matter in all eating disorder groups (MNI coordinates, x=20, y=0, z=12, and x=23, y=0, z=15; anorexia nervosa: r=0.620, p<0.005, and r=0.554, p<0.014; bulimia nervosa: r=0.543, p<0.013, and r=0.443, p<0.050; recovered anorexia nervosa: r=0.420, p<0.041, and r=0.397, p<0.055).
Other variables, including duration of illness or recovery or binge/purge episodes, did not predict brain volume measures.
Gyrus rectus volume was positively correlated with sucrose pleasantness rating in the healthy comparison group (r=0.419, F=4.970, p<0.03) and in the eating disorder groups combined (r=0.268, F=4.50, p<0.038), as well as in all study subjects together (Figure 3), but not in the eating disorder groups separately.
FIGURE 3. Gyrus Rectus Gray Matter Volumes and Ratings of Sucrose Pleasantness in Healthy Comparison and Eating Disorder Groupsa
a In panel A, manually drawn gyrus rectus gray matter volumes indicate larger volume in the eating disorder groups relative to the healthy comparison group. In panel B, ratings of taste pleasantness correlated significantly with gyrus rectus volume across all groups (R2=0.044, p<0.029).
There were no significant correlations between white matter volume and BMI or behavioral measures.
Discussion
The results of this large, well-controlled study implicate both overlapping and distinct brain morphology in two phases of anorexia nervosa as well as bulimia nervosa. Findings that show a link between brain structure and both sensitivity to reward and taste pleasantness support the notion that marked neurological underpinnings are associated with phenotypes exhibited across eating disorders. Specifically, VBM results indicate that anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa are associated with increased left orbitofrontal gyrus rectus gray matter volume. Anorexia nervosa is associated with increased anterior ventral insula gray matter volume on the right, and bulimia nervosa on the left; anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa are associated with increased gray matter in the right anterior middle insula; and bulimia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa, but not anorexia nervosa, are associated with decreased dorsal caudate and putamen gray matter volumes. Notably, in all three eating disorder groups, putamen gray matter was positively related to sensitivity to reward.
White matter was reduced in bulimia nervosa in the medial temporal lobe, in anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa in the inferior temporal lobe, and in recovered anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in the parietal lobe.
The results of this adult study are in line with recent reports of normal total gray and white matter volumes (4, 5) and finds a distinct pattern of increased and decreased regional cortical and subcortical brain volumes in anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa. However, we did not find alterations of the cingulate or temporal cortex as did previous studies (3).
Several factors distinguish our study from past investigations. First, we used more accurate analysis software (19, 20), and to our knowledge no study in anorexia nervosa and only one study in bulimia nervosa (4) has used this method. Improved separation of gray and white matter and reduced white matter volume underlying gray matter may have contributed to findings of reduced gray matter in past studies, which may be supported by our finding of reduced white matter in all three eating disorder groups. Second, we report only gray matter areas that survived stringent anatomical region-based small-volume correction as significant. Third, patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa were in a strict inpatient or partial hospital program where they had normal food and fluid intake for 7–10 days before brain imaging and were prevented from binge or purge behavior. Fluid changes significantly affect gray matter changes (23), and our study protocol helped reduce acute effects of nutritional depletion. Fourth, in a highly conservative approach, we used age, depression and anxiety, medication use, and total intracranial volume as covariates, and to our knowledge this is the first brain imaging study of eating disorders to include all those covariates. Lastly, this is the largest study of restricting-type anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa as well as bulimia nervosa on gray and white matter brain structure to date. In summary, our study procedures were stringent, and we believe they contributed to improved results.
All three eating disorder groups had increased left gyrus rectus volume, suggesting that this is potentially a trait marker for anorexia nervosa, and possibly also for bulimia nervosa, although this will need to be studied in bulimia nervosa after recovery as well. These findings support previous research implicating the orbitofrontal cortex across eating disorder groups (13, 16). The gyrus rectus is the medial part of the orbitofrontal cortex (22). It is further defined by a caudal agranular and dysgranular layer (area 14) that transitions antero-superiorly into the granular layer (area 11) (24). The agranular and dysgranular layers have fiber connections to the hippocampus, amygdala, cingulate, and insular cortex (25), areas important for taste as well as reward, motivation, and emotion processing. In line with those functional aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex may be the finding of gyrus rectus volume predicting the rated pleasantness of the sucrose solution. Greater gyrus rectus volume predicted a stronger pleasantness experience, which is consistent with previous research (26). The orbitofrontal cortex is important in food intake control (26). It is possible that the larger gyrus rectus in eating disorders is associated with stronger sensory experience of food stimuli, which could be experienced as overwhelming—as supported by increased reward and punishment sensitivity (17)—which could trigger cognitively driven food avoidance. Notably, the medial orbitofrontal cortex has been associated with food avoidance (12), and this region therefore may be a key structure in eating disorder pathology. Eating disorder phenotype differences with restriction in anorexia nervosa and episodic binge eating in bulimia nervosa, by contrast, may be driven by differences in the insula and basal ganglia between the two disorders (17, 18).
The cause for increased gyrus rectus volume is unclear. One potential explanation is that the trajectory of orbitofrontal gray matter development in eating disorders may be delayed, reaching peak volume later than in healthy comparison subjects and thus resulting in greater cortical thickness and volume (27). Another possibility could be effects of repeated food restriction in the eating disorder groups, but this will need to be tested further.
Individuals ill with and recovered from anorexia nervosa showed increased volumes in the right anterior ventral/middle insula, which connects to ventral striatal and orbitofrontal reward pathways (26). Previous research has implicated insula function in eating disorders (1), and altered insula structure could underlie altered function. The anterior ventral insula is connected to the amygdala (28) and has been associated with fear response (29). It also aids in connecting complex perceptual inputs to generate internal emotional states (30). Thus, altered insula volume could contribute to dysfunction in the regulation of anxiety by the insula, contributing to high trait anxiety in anorexia nervosa. Functional imaging taste reward studies have suggested excessive insula activation in anorexia nervosa (17), and increased size could mediate excessive, overwhelming taste stimulus transmission and subsequent input into reward-processing brain regions.
The right anterior insula has also been associated with self-recognition—the “abstract representation of oneself” (31)—and interoceptive awareness (32). The fixed perception of being fat while severely underweight in anorexia nervosa (33) could thus be related to right-sided increased anterior ventral insula volume and dysfunction. Left anterior ventral insula activation is related to gastric distention (34) and self-reported fullness (35). Thus, altered anterior insula size could interfere with normal interoception in bulimia nervosa, which may contribute to a reduced ability to sense fullness or satiation and then trigger the urge to purge after excessive food intake and guilt experienced over eating.
Dorsal caudate and putamen volumes were reduced in the recovered anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa groups, but not the anorexia nervosa group. Nevertheless, in all three eating disorder groups, right putamen gray matter volume correlated significantly positively with sensitivity to reward. The dorsal striatum has been widely associated with supporting rewarding behaviors based on previous experience (36), and reduced brain volume in that region might alter reward-motivated behaviors. Activation of the dorsal striatum responds to reward and punishment (37) and contributes to reward-based decision making (38). It is rich in dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, which code reward response, but those receptors have opposing effects (39). Thus, dopamine receptor expression may be affected by altered dorsal striatal volume and be related to altered sensitivity to reward in eating disorders.
Various right-sided white matter regions showed reduced volume in the eating disorder groups. The functionality of such alterations is unclear, but the fact that the recovered anorexia nervosa group showed reduced volumes in the right temporal and parietal lobe suggests either long-lasting or premorbid volume reductions in anorexia nervosa. The right-sided reduced inferior parietal lobe/temporo-parietal junction area in the recovered anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa groups has been associated with fiber paths connecting with the insula, especially in women (40), further indicating an involvement of insula-related brain circuitry in eating disorders.
Limitations
Although this is the largest structural imaging study contrasting anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa to date, replication is needed. Some of the results are in contrast to previous studies that found reduced brain volumes, although in our study we found both increased and decreased gray matter volumes as well as decreased white matter volumes. The brain analysis method we used shows improved accuracy (19, 20), and we do not believe our analysis was affected by any methodological systematic error. Notably, this approach does not depend on standard template assumptions but normalizes the images to a template created from the specific study population, thus improving tissue segmentation accuracy. The manual tracing of gyrus rectus volume also supports the whole-brain VBM results. Furthermore, the results in the anorexia nervosa and normal-weight recovered anorexia nervosa groups point toward consistent brain alterations.
The reason for increased gray and reduced white matter volume is unclear. One possibility is the alteration of brain maturation in eating disorders. During development, gray matter in adolescence decreases (indicative of synaptic pruning), beginning in puberty in sensorimotor areas and then spreading during late adolescence into higher-order cortical regions while white matter increases, indicative of thicker myelin sheaths, increased axonal diameter, and improved organization of white matter tracts, improving signal transduction (27). A delay or incomplete maturation of brain structures in eating disorders could be responsible for the results in this study and would fit the developmental perspective. This points to an interesting future research direction and suggests the need for longitudinal imaging studies in these groups. However, while we made every effort to reduce effects of acute malnutrition, past or more recent effects of underfeeding may also have contributed to the differences across groups. Age, comorbidity, and use of medication are all potential confounders in brain imaging studies. We accounted for those factors by using them as covariates in the imaging analysis, and it is possible that inclusion of the covariates contributed to the fact that we did not find, for instance, alterations in the cingulate or temporal cortex. Sucrose pleasantness ratings were similar across groups, and sweetness perception was similar between the eating disorder groups and the healthy comparison group. However, the anorexia nervosa group rated sweetness higher compared with the recovered anorexia nervosa group. The meaning of this difference between anorexia nervosa groups is uncertain and needs further exploration. Regression analysis between gray matter volumes and demographic and behavioral data suggested various significant relationships. However, most of those results would not have survived correction for multiple comparisons and should be viewed as preliminary until further replication.
In summary, anorexia nervosa, recovered anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa are associated with increased gyrus rectus gray matter volume, which could be a trait-related alteration. The strong correlations between gyrus rectus volume and rating of taste pleasantness may suggest overstimulation in eating disorders to sensory input, possibly contributing to food avoidance. Increased right anterior ventral insula volume in anorexia nervosa and recovered anorexia nervosa and increased left anterior ventral insula volume in bulimia nervosa distinguished the two disorders. Furthermore, the dorsal putamen appears to be important in modulating reward sensitivity in eating disorders. Studies that integrate brain structure and function will be needed to disentangle how brain volume affects behavior in eating disorders.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Joel Yager for his very thoughtful feedback and discussion.
Supplementary Material
Correction (1152_ds002.pdf)
- View/Download
- 82.75 KB
Supplementary Material (1152_ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 10.73 KB
References
1.
Kaye WH, Fudge JL, Paulus M: New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:573–584
2.
Fu M, Yu X, Lu J, Zuo Y: Repetitive motor learning induces coordinated formation of clustered dendritic spines in vivo. Nature 2012; 483:92–95
3.
Van den Eynde F, Suda M, Broadbent H, Guillaume S, Van den Eynde M, Steiger H, Israel M, Berlim M, Giampietro V, Simmons A, Treasure J, Campbell I, Schmidt U: Structural magnetic resonance imaging in eating disorders: a systematic review of voxel-based morphometry studies. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2012; 20:94–105
4.
Schäfer A, Vaitl D, Schienle A: Regional grey matter volume abnormalities in bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. Neuroimage 2010; 50:639–643
5.
Brooks SJ, Barker GJ, O’Daly OG, Brammer M, Williams SC, Benedict C, Schiöth HB, Treasure J, Campbell IC: Restraint of appetite and reduced regional brain volumes in anorexia nervosa: a voxel-based morphometric study. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11:179
6.
Joos A, Klöppel S, Hartmann A, Glauche V, Tüscher O, Perlov E, Saum B, Freyer T, Zeeck A, Tebartz van Elst L: Voxel-based morphometry in eating disorders: correlation of psychopathology with grey matter volume. Psychiatry Res 2010; 182:146–151
7.
Suchan B, Busch M, Schulte D, Grönemeyer D, Herpertz S, Vocks S: Reduction of gray matter density in the extrastriate body area in women with anorexia nervosa. Behav Brain Res 2010; 206:63–67
8.
Friederich HC, Walther S, Bendszus M, Biller A, Thomann P, Zeigermann S, Katus T, Brunner R, Zastrow A, Herzog W: Grey matter abnormalities within cortico-limbic-striatal circuits in acute and weight-restored anorexia nervosa patients. Neuroimage 2012; 59:1106–1113
9.
Roberto CA, Mayer LE, Brickman AM, Barnes A, Muraskin J, Yeung LK, Steffener J, Sy M, Hirsch J, Stern Y, Walsh BT: Brain tissue volume changes following weight gain in adults with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2011; 44:406–411
10.
Wagner A, Greer P, Bailer UF, Frank GK, Henry SE, Putnam K, Meltzer CC, Ziolko SK, Hoge J, McConaha C, Kaye WH: Normal brain tissue volumes after long-term recovery in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59:291–293
11.
Bosanac P, Kurlender S, Stojanovska L, Hallam K, Norman T, McGrath C, Burrows G, Wesnes K, Manktelow T, Olver J: Neuropsychological study of underweight and “weight-recovered” anorexia nervosa compared with bulimia nervosa and normal controls. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40:613–621
12.
Plassmann H, O’Doherty JP, Rangel A: Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making. J Neurosci 2010; 30:10799–10808
13.
Uher R, Murphy T, Brammer MJ, Dalgleish T, Phillips ML, Ng VW, Andrew CM, Williams SC, Campbell IC, Treasure J: Medial prefrontal cortex activity associated with symptom provocation in eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:1238–1246
14.
Kringelbach ML, O’Doherty J, Rolls ET, Andrews C: Activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex to a liquid food stimulus is correlated with its subjective pleasantness. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13:1064–1071
15.
Gizewski ER, Rosenberger C, de Greiff A, Moll A, Senf W, Wanke I, Forsting M, Herpertz S: Influence of satiety and subjective valence rating on cerebral activation patterns in response to visual stimulation with high-calorie stimuli among restrictive anorectic and control women. Neuropsychobiology 2010; 62:182–192
16.
Stein D, Gross-Isseroff R, Besserglick R, Ziv A, Mayer G, Yaroslavsky A, Toledano A, Voet H, Weizman A, Hermesh H: Olfactory function and alternation learning in eating disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2012; 22:615–624
17.
Frank GK, Reynolds JR, Shott ME, Jappe L, Yang TT, Tregellas JR, O’Reilly RC: Anorexia nervosa and obesity are associated with opposite brain reward response. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37:2031–2046
18.
Frank GK, Reynolds JR, Shott ME, O’Reilly RC: Altered temporal difference learning in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:728–735
19.
Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang MC, Christensen GE, Collins DL, Gee J, Hellier P, Song JH, Jenkinson M, Lepage C, Rueckert D, Thompson P, Vercauteren T, Woods RP, Mann JJ, Parsey RV: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009; 46:786–802
20.
Eggert LD, Sommer J, Jansen A, Kircher T, Konrad C: Accuracy and reliability of automated gray matter segmentation pathways on real and simulated structural magnetic resonance images of the human brain. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e45081
21.
Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research, 1995
22.
Ramos A, Chaddad-Neto F, Joaquim AF, Campos-Filho JM, Mattos JP, Ribas GC, de Oliveira E: The microsurgical anatomy of the gyrus rectus area and its neurosurgical implications. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009; 67:90–95
23.
Blasel S, Pilatus U, Magerkurth J, von Stauffenberg M, Vronski D, Mueller M, Woeckel L, Hattingen E: Metabolic gray matter changes of adolescents with anorexia nervosa in combined MR proton and phosphorus spectroscopy. Neuroradiology 2012; 54:753–764
24.
Wallis JD: Cross-species studies of orbitofrontal cortex and value-based decision-making. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15:13–19
25.
Morecraft RJ, Geula C, Mesulam MM: Cytoarchitecture and neural afferents of orbitofrontal cortex in the brain of the monkey. J Comp Neurol 1992; 323:341–358
26.
Rolls ET: Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite, and emotion. Acta Physiol Hung 2008; 95:131–164
27.
Shaw P, Kabani NJ, Lerch JP, Eckstrand K, Lenroot R, Gogtay N, Greenstein D, Clasen L, Evans A, Rapoport JL, Giedd JN, Wise SP: Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 2008; 28:3586–3594
28.
Fudge JL, Breitbart MA, Danish M, Pannoni V: Insular and gustatory inputs to the caudal ventral striatum in primates. J Comp Neurol 2005; 490:101–118
29.
Morgan MA, LeDoux JE: Contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to the acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 1999; 72:244–251
30.
Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, Lane R: Neurobiology of emotion perception, II: implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:515–528
31.
Devue C, Collette F, Balteau E, Degueldre C, Luxen A, Maquet P, Brédart S: Here I am: the cortical correlates of visual self-recognition. Brain Res 2007; 1143:169–182
32.
Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan RJ: Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:189–195
33.
Konstantakopoulos G, Varsou E, Dikeos D, Ioannidi N, Gonidakis F, Papadimitriou G, Oulis P: Delusionality of body image beliefs in eating disorders. Psychiatry Res 2012; 200:482–488
34.
Craig AD: How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:59–70
35.
Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Backus W, Wang R, Telang F, Geliebter A, Korner J, Bauman A, Fowler JS, Thanos PK, Volkow ND: Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain. Neuroimage 2008; 39:1824–1831
36.
O’Doherty J, Dayan P, Schultz J, Deichmann R, Friston K, Dolan RJ: Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 2004; 304:452–454
37.
Delgado MR, Locke HM, Stenger VA, Fiez JA: Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003; 3:27–38
38.
Balleine BW, Delgado MR, Hikosaka O: The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. J Neurosci 2007; 27:8161–8165
39.
Eagle DM, Wong JC, Allan ME, Mar AC, Theobald DE, Robbins TW: Contrasting roles for dopamine D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in the dorsomedial striatum but not the nucleus accumbens core during behavioral inhibition in the stop-signal task in rats. J Neurosci 2011; 31:7349–7356
40.
Kucyi A, Moayedi M, Weissman-Fogel I, Hodaie M, Davis KD: Hemispheric asymmetry in white matter connectivity of the temporoparietal junction with the insula and prefrontal cortex. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e35589
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 11 October 2012
Revision received: 14 December 2012
Accepted: 31 January 2013
Published online: 1 October 2013
Published in print: October 2013
Authors
Funding Information
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Supplementary Material
Supported by a Davis Foundation Award of the Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders and by NIMH grants K23 MH080135 and R01 MH096777.Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).