Abnormal Functional Activation and Maturation of Fronto-Striato-Temporal and Cerebellar Regions During Sustained Attention in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective
Sustained attention problems are common in people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and may have significant implications for the diagnosis and management of ASD and associated comorbidities. Furthermore, ASD has been associated with atypical structural brain development. The authors used functional MRI to investigate the functional brain maturation of attention between childhood and adulthood in people with ASD.
Method
Using a parametrically modulated sustained attention/vigilance task, the authors examined brain activation and its linear correlation with age between childhood and adulthood in 46 healthy male adolescents and adults (ages 11–35 years) with ASD and 44 age- and IQ-matched typically developing comparison subjects.
Results
Relative to the comparison group, the ASD group had significantly poorer task performance and significantly lower activation in inferior prefrontal cortical, medial prefrontal cortical, striato-thalamic, and lateral cerebellar regions. A conjunction analysis of this analysis with group differences in brain-age correlations showed that the comparison group, but not the ASD group, had significantly progressively increased activation with age in these regions between childhood and adulthood, suggesting abnormal functional brain maturation in ASD. Several regions that showed both abnormal activation and functional maturation were associated with poorer task performance and clinical measures of ASD and inattention.
Conclusions
The results provide first evidence that abnormalities in sustained attention networks in individuals with ASD are associated with underlying abnormalities in the functional brain maturation of these networks between late childhood and adulthood.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by pervasive abnormalities in reciprocal social communication and stereotyped, repetitive behaviors. Difficulties with attention are also common (1), and they contribute to the cognitive phenotype of ASD (2) and have significant implications for the diagnosis and management of ASD and associated comorbidities (3).
Comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is common and persists with age in individuals with ASD (4, 5). Previously, diagnostic guidelines precluded diagnosing ASD and comorbid ADHD. However, DSM-5 allows this, enabling greater understanding of comorbid attention difficulties. People with ASD have been found to have difficulties with sustained attention (6–9), although there have also been negative findings (10). Furthermore, it has been suggested that sustained attention may be an endophenotype that could help identify the neurobiological causes of ASD (11). Understanding the neurofunctional differences underlying attention problems in ASD is important, as it may help elucidate objective biomarkers of ASD and potential targets for treatment development.
Nevertheless, despite evidence of poor sustained attention in individuals with ASD, only one published functional MRI (fMRI) study of sustained attention has shown dorsolateral prefrontal, striato-thalamic, and cerebellar underactivation in children with ASD relative to comparison subjects (12). However, ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder that persists across the lifespan. A key question is therefore whether functional brain abnormalities are present during childhood and adulthood, and if so, whether they are due to abnormal functional maturation of these networks.
There is evidence of abnormal longitudinal age-related changes in the brain structure of individuals with ASD in early childhood (13, 14, 15) and adolescence (16, 17), and cross-sectional studies report abnormal age-related differences in brain structure from childhood to adulthood (18–21). However, no developmental fMRI study has investigated whether functional brain maturation between childhood and adulthood differs in people with ASD from typical development during attention or any other cognitive function.
The aim of this cross-sectional developmental fMRI study was to investigate 1) the neural substrates underlying performance on a sustained attention/vigilance task of parametrically modified attention load in a relatively large group of healthy male adolescents and adults with ASD and age-, sex-, and IQ-matched typically developing healthy comparison subjects; and 2) age-related differences in neurofunctional maturation between childhood and adulthood in people with ASD relative to comparison subjects. The task we used requires subjects to respond to a visual stimulus appearing in either predictable short intervals (0.5 seconds) or unpredictable long intervals (2, 5, or 8 seconds). Long, infrequent, unpredictable delays place a higher load on sustained attention/vigilance than short, predictable delays (12, 22).
fMRI studies of other sustained attention/vigilance tasks (for example, the continuous performance task) in typically developing adolescents and adults have shown activation in inferior and dorsolateral prefrontal, striato-thalamic, parieto-temporal, and cerebellar regions (23–25), which progressively increases with age between childhood and adulthood (24–26). We hypothesized 1) that individuals with ASD would show lower activation in fronto-striato-cerebellar sustained attention networks than typically developing comparison subjects and 2) that these functional deficits would be associated with abnormalities in underlying functional brain development between childhood and adulthood.
Method
Participants
A total of 90 physically healthy, medication-naive, right-handed males participated; 46 had ASD diagnoses and 44 were typically developing comparison subjects. Participants’ ages ranged from 11 to 35 years, and all had an IQ ≥70 (27). Comparison subjects were recruited locally by advertisement and scored below cut-off for pathology on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (28), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (29), and Conners’ Parent Rating Scale–Revised, Long Version (30). Parents of children with ASD completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Conners scale, and parents of adults with ASD completed the Barkley Parent Report (31). Participants with ASD were recruited with support from the National Autistic Society and the Maudsley Hospital. ASD diagnosis was made by a consultant psychiatrist using ICD-10 research diagnostic criteria and confirmed using the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI-R) (32). The ADI-R and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) (33) were completed for all 46 participants with ASD; all 46 reached algorithm cut-offs for autism in all domains on the ADI-R (social, communication, restricted/stereotyped) and the ADOS (communication, social). Participants with ASD either fulfilled ICD-10 research diagnostic criteria for childhood autism (N=14) or fulfilled these criteria but had no history of language delay and therefore were subtyped with Asperger’s syndrome (N=32) (Table 1).
| Comparison Group (N=44) | ASD Group (N=46) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurea | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Age (years; range, 11–35) | 19 | 6 | 18 | 6 |
| Full-scale IQ | 117 | 12 | 114 | 14 |
| Verbal IQ | 119 | 12 | 113 | 17 |
| Performance IQ | 122 | 9 | 111 | 13 |
| Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised | ||||
| Social score | 21 | 5 | ||
| Communication score | 16 | 5 | ||
| Restricted, repetitive behavior score | 6 | 2 | ||
| Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule | ||||
| Communication score | 4 | 1 | ||
| Social score | 9 | 2 | ||
| Total (communication and social) score | 13 | 3 | ||
| Stereotyped behaviors and restricted behavior score | 2 | 2 | ||
| Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, hyperactivity and attentional difficulties score | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| Conners’ Parent Rating Scale–Revised, Long Version | ||||
| DSM-IV inattentive score | 47 | 9 | 68 | 14 |
| DSM-IV hyperactive-impulsive score | 48 | 8 | 74 | 14 |
| DSM-IV total score | 48 | 9 | 74 | 11 |
| Barkley Self-Report | ||||
| Childhood Behavior Questionnaire | ||||
| Inattention score | 5 | 3 | ||
| Hyperactivity/impulsivity score | 4 | 2 | ||
| Current Behavior Questionnaire | ||||
| Inattention score | 3 | 3 | ||
| Hyperactivity/impulsivity score | 3 | 3 | ||
| Barkley Parent Report | ||||
| Childhood Behavior Questionnaire | ||||
| Inattention score | 5 | 3 | ||
| Hyperactivity/impulsivity score | 4 | 2 | ||
| Current Behavior Questionnaire | ||||
| Inattention score | 3 | 3 | ||
| Hyperactivity/impulsivity score | 3 | 2 | ||
a
For verbal and performance IQ, data were available for all participants in the ASD group and 24 in the comparison group (24 comparison subjects completed the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and 20 completed the Raven’s Performance Matrices). For the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, data were available for 23 children in the comparison group and 29 children in the ASD group. Conners’ Parent Rating Scale–Revised, Long Version was completed by 17 parents of comparison children and by all 29 parents of children in the ASD group. The Barkley Self-Report Behavior Questionnaire was completed by all 17 adults with ASD, and the Barkley Parent Report Behavior Questionnaire was completed by all 17 parents of adults with ASD.
All participants underwent a structured clinical examination to exclude comorbid medical disorders, major psychiatric disorders, and biochemical, hematologic, or chromosomal abnormalities that might affect brain function. Exclusion criteria were comorbid psychiatric or medical disorders affecting brain development (e.g., epilepsy or psychosis), psychotropic medication (antipsychotics, stimulants, mood stabilizers, antidepressants, benzodiazepines), substance dependence, history of head injury, genetic disorder associated with ASD (e.g., fragile X syndrome, 22q11 deletion syndrome), or abnormal findings on head MRI.
Forty participants (20 in the comparison group, 20 in the ASD group) also participated in our study of sustained attention in pediatric ASD relative to ADHD (12).
The local Ethics Committee conferred ethical approval, and written informed consent or assent was obtained from each participant. Each participant received £30.
Sustained Attention fMRI Task
Each participant practiced the task once in a mock scanner before scanning. The 12-minute sustained attention task (12) is a variant of psychomotor/vigilance and delay tasks (12, 22, 34) and requires subjects to respond as quickly as possible, with a right-handed button press, to a visual stimulus (a timer counting up in milliseconds) within 1 second. Subjects obtain implicit feedback by seeing the timer displaying the number of milliseconds it took them to respond to the timer. The timer appears after either short, predictable, consecutive delays of 0.5 seconds in series of three to five stimuli (240 trials total) or after unpredictable delays of 2, 5, or 8 seconds (20 trials each), pseudorandomly interspersed into the 0.5-second series after at least three predictable short delays (see Figure S1 in the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article).
Analysis of Performance Data
Multiple repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) (with group as the independent measure and delay as the repeated measure) were conducted to test for group performance differences, including mean reaction time, intrasubject response variability of reaction time (intrasubject standard deviation), omission errors, and premature responses.
fMRI Image Acquisition
fMRI images were acquired on a 3-T General Electric Signa HDx Twinspeed scanner (Milwaukee, Wisc.) using a quadrature birdcage head coil. In each of 22 noncontiguous planes parallel to the anterior-posterior commissure, 480 T2*-weighted images depicting blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast spanning the entire brain were acquired (TE=30 ms, TR=1.5 seconds, flip angle=60°, in-plane resolution=3.75 mm, slice thickness=5.0 mm, slice skip=0.5 mm). A whole-brain structural scan (inversion recovery gradient echo planar image), on which to superimpose activation maps, was acquired in the intercommissural plane (TE=40 ms, TR=3 seconds, flip angle=90°, 43 slices, slice thickness=3.0 mm, slice skip=0.3 mm).
fMRI Data Analysis
Event-related activation data were acquired in randomized trial presentation and analyzed using the XBAM method of nonparametric data analysis (35, 36). After preprocessing (see the online data supplement), a time-series analysis of individual subject activation was performed (XBAM, version 4) with a wavelet-based fMRI data resampling method (36). Using rigid body and affine transformation, individual maps were then registered in Talairach standard space (37).
A group brain activation map was then produced for each experimental condition (long delays of 2, 5, or 8 seconds), each contrasted with the implicit baseline (frequent 0.5-second intervals). Only correct trials were included in the analyses. Hypothesis testing was carried out at the cluster level. A voxel-wise test at p<0.05 was conducted to identify any voxels that might plausibly be activated, followed by a subsequent test at a cluster-level threshold of p<0.01 to remove false positive clusters produced by the voxel-level test. Combined voxel/cluster tests with permutation testing allow for excellent type I error control (36). For the group activation analysis, less than one false positive activated three-dimensional cluster was expected at p<0.05 in voxel-level comparisons and at p<0.01 in cluster-level comparisons.
For between-group comparisons of brain activation, a split-plot ANOVA design (three time delays, two groups) was conducted using a randomization-based test for voxel- or cluster-wise differences (36). Less than one false positive activation cluster was expected at p<0.05 at voxel level and at p<0.01 at cluster level.
Whole-Brain Correlations Between Activation and Age Within Groups and Group Differences Between Whole-Brain Age Correlations
Because ANOVA showed that group differences increased progressively with delay, we used the longest delay (8 seconds) for the whole-brain age correlation analyses. To test for a linear correlation between whole-brain activation and age, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was first computed at each voxel in standard space between age data and signal change across all subjects. Correlation coefficients were recalculated after randomly permuting the ages, but not the fMRI data. Multiply repeating the second step (1,000 times per voxel, then combining across all voxels) gives the distribution of correlation coefficients under the null hypothesis of no association between specific ages and specific BOLD effects. This null distribution can then be used to assess the probability of any particular correlation coefficient under the null hypothesis. The critical value of the correlation coefficient at any desired type I error level in the original (nonpermuted) data could be determined by reference to this distribution. Statistical analysis was extended to cluster level (36).
To test whether group had differential effects on linear age correlations across the whole brain, group differences were examined in the correlation coefficients of brain activation with age. For each group independently, the average Pearson correlation coefficient between subject age and fMRI response was computed and group differences in correlation were calculated. To determine the significance of this difference, the appropriate null distribution was generated by randomly permuting subjects and ages between groups, thus scrambling any group differences. For each permutation, the correlation difference between scrambled groups was calculated and the resulting values were combined across all voxels to produce a whole-brain null distribution of differences in correlation. Testing was then extended to cluster level, with the cluster probability under the null hypothesis chosen to set the level of expected type I error clusters at less than one. Less than one error cluster was observed (at p<0.05 for voxel and p<0.01 for cluster analyses). Areas where either group showed exclusive significant progressive or regressive changes are reported.
To determine the direction of group differences in age correlations, post hoc analyses were conducted on the statistical measures of the BOLD response extracted for each subject in these regions, and age correlations were then performed for all clusters within each group.
Conjunction Analysis
To test whether areas of group differences were associated with differential neurofunctional development, we performed a conjunction analysis between the ANOVA group difference analysis and differences in whole-brain age correlations. Thus, we identified voxels where both the ANOVA group effect and between-group differences in whole-brain age correlations were significant (38).
Results
There were no significant differences in age or IQ between the ASD and comparison groups.
Performance
Across all participants, there was a significant effect of delay on reaction time (F=124, df=3, 86, p<0.001), intrasubject standard deviation (F=8, df=3, 86, p<0.001), and omission errors (F=3, df=3, 86, p<0.036) (see Table S1 in the online data supplement).
This analysis was repeated with age as a covariate. There was a significant effect of group on reaction time (F=12, df=1, 87, p<0.001) and intrasubject standard deviation (F=10, df=1, 87, p<0.002) as a result of the ASD group having a slower reaction time and greater intrasubject variability than the comparison group. No significant group-by-delay effect was observed.
Age Effects on Performance
Reaction time, intrasubject standard deviation, and premature responses were all significantly negatively correlated with age in both the ASD and comparison groups (r=−0.463, p<0.001) (see Table S1 in the data supplement). There was a significant between-group difference in age correlation with reaction time only (p<0.001), because of significantly stronger age correlations in the comparison group (r=−0.645, p<0.001) relative to the ASD group (r=−0.409, p<0.005).
Movement
There was no significant group effect in the extent of three-dimensional motion as measured by maximum, minimum, or median displacement in the x, y, and z axes (see Table S2 in the online data supplement).
fMRI Results
Brain activations within each group are shown in Figure S2 in the online data supplement.
ANOVA group difference effect across all delays
Across all delays, the comparison group, relative to the ASD group, showed higher activation in the left and right inferior frontal cortex reaching into the superior temporal lobe, left middle frontal cortex, insula, superior parietal cortex, posterior cingulate/precuneus, supplementary motor area, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, thalamus, midbrain, and left and right cerebellar vermis and hemispheres (Table 2, Figure 1A).
| Brain Regions of Activation, Comparison Group > ASD Group | Brodmann’s Area | Talairach Coordinates | Number of Voxels | Cluster p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survived the conjunction analysis | ||||
| Right inferior frontal cortex; superior, medial, temporal lobe; globus pallidus; putamen; hippocampus | 47/45/38/21/22 | 28, 0, –18 | 411 | 0.002 |
| Left inferior frontal cortex, insula | 46/47/45/46 | –32, 29, –12 | 187 | 0.002 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 9/8/6 | –25, 22, 36 | 193 | 0.003 |
| Right and left thalamus, midbrain | 18, –14, 3 | 103 | 0.05 | |
| Right and left cerebellar vermis and hemispheres | 0, –22, –29 | 188 | 0.002 | |
| Did not survive the conjunction analysis | ||||
| Left superior temporal lobe | 38 | –25, 29, –34 | 17 | 0.002 |
| Left superior temporal, medial temporal lobe | 38/21 | –39, 14, –29 | 173 | 0.002 |
| Left inferior temporal lobe, posterior insula, putamen, caudate, nucleus accumbens, hippocampal gyrus | 20/36 | –28, –3, –12 | 283 | 0.02 |
| Right posterior central gyrus, superior parietal lobe, precuneus, posterior cingulate | 5/7/31 | 25, –33, 42 | 116 | 0.003 |
| Left posterior cingulate, precuneus, supplementary motor area | 31/7/6 | –7, –33, 36 | 155 | 0.002 |
| Right posterior cingulate, precuneus, supplementary motor area | 31/7/6 | 7, –25, 36 | 185 | 0.002 |
FIGURE 1. Horizontal fMRI Sections Showing Group Differences in Brain Activation Between Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (N=46) and Typically Developing Comparison Subjects (N=44)a
a In panel A, the sections show analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) group differences in the sustained attention task for all long delays combined (2, 5, or 8 seconds), each contrasted with the 0.5-second delay. Activation clusters in orange indicate regions where the ASD group had significantly lower activation relative to the comparison group. No areas showed higher activation in the ASD group relative to the comparison group. In panel B, the sections show group differences in whole-brain correlations between brain activation and age for the 8-second delay contrasted with the 0.5-second delay. Activation clusters shown in orange are those where the comparison group showed progressively greater activation with increasing age relative to the ASD group, which showed no significant age correlations in these regions. In panel C, the sections show results of the conjunction analysis between the ANOVA of between-group differences for all long delays versus the 0.5-second delay (panel A) and the group differences in whole-brain age correlations for the 8-second versus the 0.5-second delay (panel B). The resulting activation clusters (in orange) show areas where the comparison group had higher activation relative to the ASD group for long versus short delays and where, at the same time, activation was progressively correlated with increasing age in the comparison group but not in the ASD group during the 8-second delay versus the 0.5 delay. Talairach z coordinates are indicated for slice distance (in mm) from the intercommissural line. The right hemisphere corresponds to the right side of the image.
Group differences in whole-brain correlations between brain activation and age for the longest delay.
Whole-brain correlations between age and brain activation individually for each group for the 8-second delay are shown in Figure S2 in the online data supplement.
The group difference analysis between whole-brain age correlations showed that in several clusters, the comparison group had higher activation with increasing age, whereas in the ASD group, either this effect was diminished or negative correlations with age were observed in the left and right inferior frontal cortex-superior temporal junction, the left middle frontal gyrus/inferior frontal cortex, left and right superior and middle temporal and inferior and superior parietal regions, left striato-thalamic areas, the posterior cingulate, the midbrain, and the right cerebellar hemispheres and vermis (Table 3, Figure 1B).
| Age Correlation Between BBAM Age Differences and Agea | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regions of Activation | Brodmann’s Area | Talairach Coordinates | Number of Voxels | Cluster p Value | Comparison Group | ASD Group | ||
| Correlation | p | Correlation | p | |||||
| Survived the conjunction analysis | ||||||||
| Right inferior frontal cortex, insula, superior temporal lobe | 11/47/46/45/10/22 | 25, 59, –18 | 288 | <0.001 | 0.562 | 0.000** | –0.515 | <0.001** |
| Left inferior frontal cortex | 10/45/46/11/25 | –43, 48, 3 | 264 | <0.001 | 0.335 | 0.026* | –0.586 | <0.001** |
| Left middle frontal, inferior frontal cortex | 45/6 | –50, 18, 20 | 43 | <0.001 | 0.161 | 0.296 | –0.598 | <0.001** |
| Thalamus, putamen, globus pallidus, hippocampal gyrus, occipital lobe, posterior cingulate, left cerebellum, midbrain | 19/39/31 | –3, –48, 3 | 365 | <0.001 | 0.344 | 0.022* | –0.572 | <0.001** |
| Right cerebellar hemisphere | 18, –44, –23 | 76 | <0.001 | –0.116 | 0.452 | –0.637 | <0.001** | |
| Did not survive the conjunction analysis | ||||||||
| Right medial frontal gyrus | 9 | 7, 59, 31 | 214 | <0.001 | 0.375 | 0.012* | –0.508 | <0.001** |
| Right rostral medial frontal gyrus | 11 | 7, 74, –12 | 13 | 0.001 | 0.253 | 0.097 | –0.394 | 0.007** |
| Left premotor gyrus | 6 | –43, –14, 64 | 17 | 0.001 | 0.153 | 0.321 | –0.379 | 0.009* |
| Right supplementary motor area | 6 | 3, –22, 69 | 59 | <0.001 | 0.221 | 0.149 | –0.486 | 0.001** |
| Left superior temporal lobe | 38 | –25, 3, –34 | 36 | <0.001 | 0.129 | 0.404 | –0.422 | 0.004** |
| Right superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 61, 7, 3 | 14 | 0.002 | 0.203 | 0.186 | –0.348 | 0.018* |
| Right middle temporal gyrus | 21 | 50, –33, 3 | 20 | <0.001 | 0.325 | 0.032* | –0.209 | 0.162 |
| Left middle temporal gyrus | 39 | –46, –59, 25 | 22 | <0.001 | 0.537 | 0.000 | 0.019 | 0.898 |
| Left precuneus | 7 | –14, –74, 47 | 91 | <0.001 | 0.370 | 0.013* | –0.550 | <0.001** |
| Right inferior parietal lobe | 40 | 46, –22, 36 | 19 | 0.002 | 0.138 | 0.371 | –0.461 | 0.001** |
| Left inferior parietal lobe | 40 | –36, –29, 25 | 107 | <0.001 | –0.010 | 0.947 | –0.571 | <0.001** |
| Right uncus | 36 | 7, –7. –29 | 14 | <0.001 | –0.006 | 0.971 | –0.462 | 0.001** |
| Right occipital gyrus | 19 | 32, –88, 9 | 51 | <0.001 | 0.262 | 0.086 | –0.662 | <0.001** |
| Left cuneus | 18 | –21, –92, 9 | 15 | 0.004 | 0.215 | 0.160 | –0.467 | 0.001** |
| Midbrain | –10, –18, –34 | 10 | 0.008 | 0.080 | 0.608 | –0.481 | 0.001** | |
| Right cerebellar vermis | 7, –51, –40 | 23 | <0.001 | 0.122 | 0.430 | –0.478 | 0.001** | |
a
Age correlation between group differences in whole-brain correlations between brain activation and age (for the 8-second delay) and age in months. The maps are thresholded to give less than one type I error cluster per map.
*p<0.05. **p<0.01.
Conjunction Analysis
The conjunction analysis showed five areas of overlap that both differed significantly between groups and increased significantly with age in the comparison group but not the ASD group: the right inferior frontal cortex-superior temporal junction reaching into the putamen; the left inferior frontal cortex reaching into the superior temporal lobe; the left middle frontal cortex; a cluster including the right thalamus, globus pallidus, and midbrain; and a right lateral cerebellar cluster (Table 4, Figure 1C).
| Regions of Activation | Brodmann’s Area | Talairach Coordinates | Number of Voxels |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal lobe, putamen | 47/45/44/21/22 | 37, 9, –18 | 78 |
| Left inferior frontal cortex | 47 | –32, 29, –12 | 26 |
| Left middle, inferior frontal cortex | 46/45 | –43, 48, 3 | 28 |
| Right thalamus, globus pallidus, midbrain | 18, –14, 3 | 53 | |
| Right cerebellum | 18, –44, –23 | 7 |
Brain-Performance and Brain-Behavior Correlations
To investigate whether regions that survived the conjunction analysis were associated with performance or behavior, the statistical BOLD response in these regions was extracted for each subject and then correlated with reaction time for each group and, in the ASD group, with ADOS (communication, social) scores and z-transformed ADHD scores (z-transformed Conners’ Parent Rating Scale–Revised hyperactivity T-score [children] and Barkley self-report hyperactivity score [adults]).
In the comparison group, reaction time was significantly negatively correlated with activation in the right inferior frontal cortex-superior temporal lobe (r=−0.3, p<0.03), the left inferior frontal cortex (r=−0.3, p<0.05), and clusters in the left middle frontal cortex (r=−0.3, p<0.03). No significant correlations between performance and activation were observed in the ASD group.
In the ASD group, underactivation of the left inferior frontal cortex was negatively correlated with ADOS communication scores (r=−0.32, p<0.03), and underactivation of the right pallido-thalamic cluster was negatively correlated with z-transformed ADHD scores (r=−0.39, p<0.008).
To investigate the possible impact of group performance differences on group differences in brain activation and age correlations, we repeated both analyses using performance-matched subgroups (N=78); all findings remained identical except that the left middle frontal cortex and a small left temporal cluster no longer differed between subgroups (see Figures S4 and S5 in the online data supplement).
Although motion did not differ between groups, to assess the possible impact of motion on group differences in activation or age correlation, we conducted a whole-brain correlation analysis between maximum motion displacement in the x, y, and z dimensions and brain activation for the 8-second versus 0.5-second contrast across all subjects. Two clusters were correlated with motion, but they did not overlap with the group differences in activation or age correlations (see the online data supplement, including Figure S6).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first fMRI investigation of differences in brain activation and cross-sectional functional brain development between healthy adolescents and adults with ASD relative to age- and IQ-matched typically developing comparison subjects during a sustained attention task. Relative to comparison subjects, individuals with ASD exhibited underactivation of left and right inferior frontal cortical/superior temporal cortical, left middle frontal cortical, striato-thalamic, and right lateral cerebellar regions. Our key novel finding is that abnormal activation in individuals with ASD in these areas was concomitant to underlying abnormalities in their functional brain maturation; with increasing age, the comparison group, but not the ASD group, showed progressively greater activation in these regions. Moreover, abnormal activation and functional maturation in inferior frontal cortical/middle frontal cortical/striato-thalamic regions in people with ASD was associated with poorer task performance and clinical measures of ASD and attention. These findings offer cross-sectional evidence that functional abnormalities in individuals with ASD during attention tasks may be related to underlying differences in the dynamic maturation of these functional networks between adolescence and adulthood.
The ASD group had significantly slower reaction times and larger intrasubject response variability, consistent with previous findings in children and adults with ASD during attention tasks (6, 9). Inconsistent response times are associated with sustained attention problems (39), while slower reaction times with increasing task delays suggest difficulties with sustained attention and stimulus anticipation (40).
While comparison subjects showed progressively higher activation across all delays in a typical sustained attention network (left and right inferior frontal cortex; left middle frontal cortex; striato-thalamic, superior temporal, and inferior/superior-parietal regions; and lateral cerebellum) (23), individuals with ASD had reduced activation in these regions across all delays, a finding that extends to adulthood previous evidence for lower activation in these regions in children with ASD during sustained attention (12).
Most of these activations in left and right inferior frontal cortical, left middle frontal cortical, striato-thalamic, and cerebellar regions also showed a significant linear age correlation in the comparison group, supporting previous developmental fMRI attention findings (24–26, 41), but not in the ASD group. This demonstrates first cross-sectional evidence that abnormal inferior frontal cortical/middle frontal cortical-striato-thalamic and cerebellar brain activation in people with ASD during an attention task may be caused by abnormal functional maturation of these regions between childhood and adulthood. Furthermore, left and right inferior frontal cortical/superior temporal and left middle frontal cortical clusters that had lower activation and were functionally more immature in the ASD group were associated with better performance (shorter reaction time) in the comparison group, but not the ASD group. This suggests that in typically developing individuals these regions are recruited to perform better with increasing sustained attention/vigilance load, while poor task performance in ASD may be due to poor recruitment and “dysmaturation” of these frontal regions. Specifically, the left middle frontal cortex activation cluster was likely associated with performance differences, as it was no longer observed in performance-matched subgroups, while the bilateral underactivation and dysmaturation in the inferior frontal cortex survived the performance-matched subgroup analysis and may be more closely related to the ASD phenotype. Finally, fMRI evidence for abnormal functional maturation is reinforced by performance data, which showed a significantly stronger negative correlation between age and reaction time in the comparison group but not the ASD group.
These inferior frontal cortical/middle frontal cortical, superior temporal, striato-thalamic, and cerebellar attention regions that showed abnormal activation and functional maturation have also been shown to have abnormal structure and development in ASD (19, 20, 42–44), with evidence of time-specific regional changes—early abnormal overgrowth, followed by delayed growth in adolescence and adulthood, particularly in frontal and temporal regions (18, 45).
Our cross-sectional findings of abnormal functional maturation in inferior frontal cortical/middle frontal cortical, superior temporal, pallido-thalamic, and lateral cerebellar regions in ASD are the first to extend evidence of a postadolescent abnormal structural maturation in these regions in ASD (17, 19, 20, 44) to functional brain maturation. Interestingly, the regions found to be delayed in functional maturation in ASD are more susceptible to developmental delay, since they continue to develop across late adolescence into mid-adulthood (46).
We also showed a correlation between the attention-mediating left middle frontal cortex (lower in both activation and neurofunctional development in the ASD group) and ADOS communication score, supporting the suggestion that attention contributes to the cognitive-behavioral phenotype of ASD (2). Additionally, the underactivated left middle frontal cortical and left and right inferior frontal cortical-striatal clusters were correlated with better attention performance (shorter reaction time) in comparison subjects, suggesting an association in ASD between communication difficulties, poor attention performance, and underactivation and dysmaturation in the left middle frontal cortex/inferior frontal cortex. Intriguingly, the left middle frontal cortex, while crucial for attention (47), has also been associated with social cognition and communication (48).
Interestingly, only the underactivation of the right pallido-thalamic cluster correlated negatively with z-transformed ADHD scores in the ASD group. Striatal dysfunctions are key to ADHD (49) and may be shared between ADHD and ASD (12), possibly explaining the high overlap of attention problems. Furthermore, left middle frontal cortical and striato-thalamic underactivation was observed during the same task in both children with ADHD and children with ASD (12). Sustained attention has major implications for learning and executive function (50), matures late in adolescence (51), and is a key cognitive impairment not only in ASD but also in numerous psychiatric disorders, particularly ADHD (49). To our knowledge, however, there have been no cross-sectional or longitudinal fMRI studies in related psychiatric disorders. Future cross-sectional and longitudinal studies should investigate the specificity of the developmental underpinnings of attention deficits across disorders.
Limitations
Study limitations include the cross-sectional design, which is confounded by cohort effects; possible task confounding between trial duration and predictability; and a lack of measures of pubertal development. Only high-functioning males with ASD were included, which limits generalizability, and some people in our ASD group scored high on ADHD measures despite not having a clinical ADHD diagnosis. Although the findings survived the performance-matched subanalysis, we cannot rule out confounding due to subtle nonsignificant group differences in performance or strategies. A strength of the study is the relatively large sample of physically healthy, medication-naive, clearly diagnosed individuals with ASD without other psychiatric diagnoses and a 25-year age range from childhood to adulthood.
Conclusions
This cross-sectional developmental fMRI study demonstrates that both poor performance and underactivation of inferior frontal cortical/middle frontal cortical, superior temporal, striatal, and lateral cerebellar attention regions in individuals with ASD relative to comparison subjects are due to abnormal maturation of performance and functional brain development in these regions between childhood and adulthood, and are associated with clinical symptoms of ASD and inattention. This may underlie the pervasive attention difficulties across the lifespan for people with ASD. Our findings suggest that dynamic developmental approaches are crucial to enable better understanding of brain, cognition, and behavior in ASD. Longitudinal studies should determine the development of attention networks across the lifespan for people with ASD and identify effective, early, age-appropriate treatment (cognitive, behavioral, and/or pharmacological) targeting these systems.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all of the individuals and their families who participated in this study and the National Autistic Society for their help in recruiting participants. They are also grateful for the assistance of the radiographers and physicists of the Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London.
Footnote
Prof. D.G. Murphy and Dr. Rubia contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material (1107_ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 371.79 KB
References
1.
Sturm H, Fernell E, Gillberg C: Autism spectrum disorders in children with normal intellectual levels: associated impairments and subgroups. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46:444–447
2.
Allen G, Courchesne E: Attention function and dysfunction in autism. Front Biosci 2001; 6:D105–D119
3.
Taurines R, Schwenck C, Westerwald E, Sachse M, Siniatchkin M, Freitag C: ADHD and autism: differential diagnosis or overlapping traits? A selective review. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord 4:115–139
4.
Simonoff E, Jones CR, Baird G, Pickles A, Happé F, Charman T: The persistence and stability of psychiatric problems in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:186–194
5.
Johnston K, Dittner A, Bramham J, Murphy C, Knight A, Russell A: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res 2013; 6:225–236
6.
Corbett BA, Constantine LJ: Autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: assessing attention and response control with the integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test. Child Neuropsychol 2006; 12:335–348
7.
Corbett BA, Constantine LJ, Hendren R, Rocke D, Ozonoff S: Examining executive functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and typical development. Psychiatry Res 2009; 166:210–222
8.
Garretson HB, Fein D, Waterhouse L: Sustained attention in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 1990; 20:101–114
9.
Schatz AM, Weimer AK, Trauner DA: Brief report: attention differences in Asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 2002; 32:333–336
10.
Johnson KA, Robertson IH, Kelly SP, Silk TJ, Barry E, Dáibhis A, Watchorn A, Keavey M, Fitzgerald M, Gallagher L, Gill M, Bellgrove MA: Dissociation in performance of children with ADHD and high-functioning autism on a task of sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45:2234–2245
11.
Rommelse NN, Geurts HM, Franke B, Buitelaar JK, Hartman CA: A review on cognitive and brain endophenotypes that may be common in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and facilitate the search for pleiotropic genes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011; 35:1363–1396
12.
Christakou A, Murphy CM, Chantiluke K, Cubillo AI, Smith AB, Giampietro V, Daly E, Ecker C, Robertson D, Murphy DG, Rubia K; MRC AIMS consortium: Disorder-specific functional abnormalities during sustained attention in youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and with autism. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18:236–244
13.
Hazlett HC, Poe MD, Gerig G, Styner M, Chappell C, Smith RG, Vachet C, Piven J: Early brain overgrowth in autism associated with an increase in cortical surface area before age 2 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68:467–476
14.
Schumann CM, Bloss CS, Barnes CC, Wideman GM, Carper RA, Akshoomoff N, Pierce K, Hagler D, Schork N, Lord C, Courchesne E: Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of cortical development through early childhood in autism. J Neurosci 2010; 30:4419–4427
15.
Carper RA, Moses P, Tigue ZD, Courchesne E: Cerebral lobes in autism: early hyperplasia and abnormal age effects. Neuroimage 2002; 16:1038–1051
16.
Hardan AY, Libove RA, Keshavan MS, Melhem NM, Minshew NJ: A preliminary longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of brain volume and cortical thickness in autism. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66:320–326
17.
Hua X, Thompson PM, Leow AD, Madsen SK, Caplan R, Alger JR, O’Neill J, Joshi K, Smalley SL, Toga AW, Levitt JG: Brain growth rate abnormalities visualized in adolescents with autism. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34:425–436
18.
Amaral DG, Schumann CM, Nordahl CW: Neuroanatomy of autism. Trends Neurosci 2008; 31:137–145
19.
Courchesne E, Campbell K, Solso S: Brain growth across the life span in autism: age-specific changes in anatomical pathology. Brain Res 2011; 1380:138–145
20.
Langen M, Schnack HG, Nederveen H, Bos D, Lahuis BE, de Jonge MV, van Engeland H, Durston S: Changes in the developmental trajectories of striatum in autism. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66:327–333
21.
Murphy CM, Deeley Q, Daly EM, Ecker C, O’Brien FM, Hallahan B, Loth E, Toal F, Reed S, Hales S, Robertson DM, Craig MC, Mullins D, Barker GJ, Lavender T, Johnston P, Murphy KC, Murphy DG: Anatomy and aging of the amygdala and hippocampus in autism spectrum disorder: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of Asperger syndrome. Autism Res 2012; 5:3–12
22.
Rubia K, Overmeyer S, Taylor E, Brammer M, Williams S, Simmons A, Andrew C, Bullmore E: Prefrontal involvement in “temporal bridging” and timing movement. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36:1283–1293
23.
Lawrence NS, Ross TJ, Hoffmann R, Garavan H, Stein EA: Multiple neuronal networks mediate sustained attention. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:1028–1038
24.
Smith AB, Halari R, Giampetro V, Brammer M, Rubia K: Developmental effects of reward on sustained attention networks. Neuroimage 2011; 56:1693–1704
25.
Rubia K, Hyde Z, Halari R, Giampietro V, Smith A: Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual-spatial attention allocation. Neuroimage 2010; 51:817–827
26.
Christakou A, Halari R, Smith AB, Ifkovits E, Brammer M, Rubia K: Sex-dependent age modulation of frontostriatal and temporo-parietal activation during cognitive control. Neuroimage 2009; 48:223–236
27.
Wechsler D: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, Tex, Psychological Corp, 1999
28.
Goldberg DP, Hillier VF: A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979; 9:139–145
29.
Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H: Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177:534–539
30.
Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, Epstein JN: The revised Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998; 26:257–268
31.
Barkley RM, Murphy KR: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Clinical Workbook, 3rd ed. New York, Guilford, 2005
32.
Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A: Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 1994; 24:659–685
33.
Lord C, Rutter M, Goode S, Heemsbergen J, Jordan H, Mawhood L, Schopler E: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: a standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. J Autism Dev Disord 1989; 19:185–212
34.
Drummond SP, Bischoff-Grethe A, Dinges DF, Ayalon L, Mednick SC, Meloy MJ: The neural basis of the psychomotor vigilance task. Sleep 2005; 28:1059–1068
35.
Brammer MJ, Bullmore ET, Simmons A, Williams SC, Grasby PM, Howard RJ, Woodruff PW, Rabe-Hesketh S: Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15:763–770
36.
Bullmore ET, Suckling J, Overmeyer S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Taylor E, Brammer MJ: Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18:32–42
37.
Talairach J, Tournoux P: Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain. New York, Thieme, 1988
38.
Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline JB: Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 2005; 25:653–660
39.
Leth-Steensen C, Elbaz ZK, Douglas VI: Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2000; 104:167–190
40.
Rubia K, Smith A, Taylor E: Performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on a test battery of impulsiveness. Child Neuropsychol 2007; 13:276–304
41.
Rubia K, Smith AB, Woolley J, Nosarti C, Heyman I, Taylor E, Brammer M: Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control. Hum Brain Mapp 2006; 27:973–993
42.
Ecker C, Rocha-Rego V, Johnston P, Mourao-Miranda J, Marquand A, Daly EM, Brammer MJ, Murphy C, Murphy DG; MRC AIMS Consortium: Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: a pattern classification approach. Neuroimage 2010; 49:44–56
43.
Toal F, Daly EM, Page L, Deeley Q, Hallahan B, Bloemen O, Cutter WJ, Brammer MJ, Curran S, Robertson D, Murphy C, Murphy KC, Murphy DG: Clinical and anatomical heterogeneity in autistic spectrum disorder: a structural MRI study. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1171–1181
44.
Hallahan B, Daly EM, McAlonan G, Loth E, Toal F, O’Brien F, Robertson D, Hales S, Murphy C, Murphy KC, Murphy DG: Brain morphometry volume in autistic spectrum disorder: a magnetic resonance imaging study of adults. Psychol Med 2009; 39:337–346
45.
Wallace GL, Dankner N, Kenworthy L, Giedd JN, Martin A: Age-related temporal and parietal cortical thinning in autism spectrum disorders. Brain 2010; 133:3745–3754
46.
Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW: Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6:309–315
47.
Fassbender C, Murphy K, Foxe JJ, Wylie GR, Javitt DC, Robertson IH, Garavan H: A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 20:132–143
48.
Wood JN: Social cognition and the prefrontal cortex. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2003; 2:97–114
49.
Rubia K: “Cool” inferior frontostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus “hot” ventromedial orbitofrontal-limbic dysfunction in conduct disorder: a review. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69:e69–e87
50.
Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP: The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001; 35:146–160
51.
Luna B, Garver KE, Urban TA, Lazar NA, Sweeney JA: Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Dev 2004; 75:1357–1372
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 15 March 2012
Revision received: 31 October 2013
Accepted: 28 March 2014
Published online: 1 October 2014
Published in print: October 2014
Authors
Funding Information
Medical Research Council10.13039/501100000265: MRC G0300155
Medical Research Council10.13039/501100000265: Autism Imaging Multicentre Study (MRC AIMS)
Dr. C.M. Murphy has received funding from Lilly and speaking honoraria from Shire and Flynn Pharma. Professor Brammer has served as a consultant for P1Vital. Professor Rubia has received funding from Lilly and speaking honoraria from Lilly, Shire, and Medice. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Supplementary Material
Supported by grant MRC GO300155 (to Professor Rubia) from the U.K. MRC; by a grant (to Prof. D.G. Murphy) from the MRC Autism Imaging Multicentre Study (MRC AIMS); by a grant (to Prof. D.G. Murphy) from the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) AIMS network (receiving support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 115300, which includes financial contributions from the EU Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007–2013] and from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations); and a grant (to Prof. D.G. Murphy) from the Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment.The MRC AIMS Consortium is a collaboration of autism research centers in the United Kingdom including the Institute of Psychiatry, London; the Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge; and the Autism Research Group, University of Oxford. It is funded by the MRC and headed by the Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry. The Consortium members are in, alphabetical order, A.J. Bailey, S. Baron-Cohen, P.F. Bolton, E.T. Bullmore, S. Carrington, B. Chakrabarti, E.M. Daly, S.C. Deoni, C. Ecker, F. Happe, J. Henty, P. Jezzard, P. Johnston, D.K. Jones, M. Lombardo, A. Madden, D. Mullins, C.M. Murphy, D.G. Murphy, G. Pasco, S. Sadek, D. Spain, R. Steward, J. Suckling, S. Wheelwright, and S.C. Williams.Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).