Skip to main content
Full access
Letters to the Editor
Published Online: 1 December 2020

Duration of Untreated Psychosis: Getting Both the Timing and the Sample Right: Response to Woods et al.

To the Editor: We appreciate the opportunity to read and respond to the insightful letter from Drs. Woods, Yung, McGorry, and McGlashan, leaders in this field of research. They point out two possible confounding effects of our analyses, which concluded that the effect of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) on long-term outcomes in schizophrenia was explained by lead-time bias. The first point concerns the sample selection, and the second concerns the level of treatment the patients received. We discuss these two points in turn.
Dr. Woods and colleagues note that including only those individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia at the last observation could have biased the sample toward poor outcomes. However, we note that the relationship between DUP and outcomes has been largely observed among those with schizophrenia (13). Indeed, fitting the same multilevel spline models to data from individuals in the Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort with diagnoses other than schizophrenia found no effect of DUP on either mean psychosocial function or trajectories of psychosocial function. Figure 1 depicts a LOESS plot of trajectories as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) as a function of DUP dichotomized at the median of 212 days, which shows the overlap between these groups.
FIGURE 1. LOESS plot of psychosocial function in psychotic disorders other than schizophrenia, as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), as a function of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) dichotomized at the median of 212 days in a study of the association between DUP and illness course
Second, we note that previous studies of this cohort have documented substantial diagnostic shifts, such that by 24 months after first admission, more than 20% of those diagnosed with schizophrenia shifted into this group from other diagnostic categories (4). By the 10-year follow-up, more than 45% of this group included individuals who had been reassigned from other diagnostic categories (5). As of the 20-year follow-up, this number had reached nearly 50%. Approximately 28% of this group had a baseline diagnosis of other psychotic disorder, while 10% were originally diagnosed with bipolar disorder, 20% with major depressive disorder, and 2% with substance-induced psychosis. For this reason, those with a last available diagnosis of schizophrenia have shorter DUPs (median days, 310) and better baseline psychosocial function (mean GAF score, 52.52) than those with a baseline diagnosis of schizophrenia (median DUP days, 358; mean GAF score, 48.93; both p values <0.01), but not worse outcomes (20-year GAF scores were 52.52 and 48.93, respectively; p=0.33). In sum, selecting the sample based on the last available diagnosis captured a group of individuals with diverse initial presentations and a broad range of DUPs and did not create a bias toward poor outcomes.
Dr. Woods and colleagues suggest that halting decline may require interventions more potent than those received by the Suffolk County cohort. The treatment received by this cohort is primarily pharmacological and is not comparable to the vocational rehabilitation, family education, and individual therapy implemented in NAVIGATE (6), OnTrackNY (https://www.ontrackny.org), and a number of other early intervention programs. Such comprehensive coordinated specialty care programs may be more effective—although long-term follow-up of these cohorts is needed.
However, we do not find evidence that the Suffolk County cohort is atypical, as Dr. Woods and colleagues suppose. Before adjustment for lead-time bias, the association between DUP and psychosocial function was moderate in size (Cohen’s d=0.75, p<0.001). Meta-analytic evidence indicates that outcomes in the Suffolk County cohort are consistent with other representative samples with first-admission psychosis (7). Therefore, although the treatment is not equivalent to that received by patients in clinical trials, it is representative of treatment received by patients with first-admission psychosis. As such, this cohort is important for understanding the current state of intervention for schizophrenia in the community.
In sum, we believe that our sample is an informative one in which to evaluate the association between DUP and long-term outcomes. Results support our finding that lead-time bias confounds the association between DUP and illness course in schizophrenia.

References

1.
Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, et al: Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:975–983
2.
Penttilä M, Jääskeläinen E, Hirvonen N, et al: Duration of untreated psychosis as predictor of long-term outcome in schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 205:88–94
3.
Perkins DO, Gu H, Boteva K, et al: Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:1785–1804
4.
Schwartz JE, Fennig S, Tanenberg-Karant M, et al: Congruence of diagnoses 2 years after a first-admission diagnosis of psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57:593–600
5.
Bromet EJ, Kotov R, Fochtmann LJ, et al: Diagnostic shifts during the decade following first admission for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168:1186–1194
6.
Mueser KT, Penn DL, Addington J, et al: The NAVIGATE program for first-episode psychosis: rationale, overview, and description of psychosocial components. Psychiatr Serv 2015; 66:680–690
7.
Menezes NM, Arenovich T, Zipursky RB: A systematic review of longitudinal outcome studies of first-episode psychosis. Psychol Med 2006; 36:1349–1362

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 1183 - 1185
PubMed: 33256442

History

Accepted: 15 June 2020
Published online: 1 December 2020
Published in print: December 01, 2020

Keywords

  1. Psychosis
  2. Early Intervention
  3. Duration of Untreated Psychosis
  4. Epidemiology
  5. Treatment Delay
  6. First-Episode Psychosis

Authors

Details

Katherine G. Jonas, Ph.D. [email protected]
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
Laura J. Fochtmann, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
Greg Perlman, Ph.D.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
Yuan Tian, M.Sc.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
John M. Kane, M.D.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
Evelyn J. Bromet, Ph.D.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).
Roman Kotov, Ph.D.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health (Jonas, Fochtmann, Perlman, Bromet, Kotov) and Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Tian), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York (Kane).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Jonas ([email protected]).

Funding Information

The authors’ disclosures accompany the original article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share