Skip to main content
Full access
Articles
Published Online: 10 September 2021

Association of ECT With Risks of All-Cause Mortality and Suicide in Older Medicare Patients

Abstract

Objective:

This observational study examined the effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on suicide and all-cause mortality risk in older psychiatric patients.

Methods:

Participants were Medicare-insured psychiatric inpatients age 65 or older. Patients receiving ECT were exact-matched to control subjects (in a 1:3 ratio) on age, gender, principal hospital diagnosis, past-year psychiatric hospitalizations, past-year suicide attempts, and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Cox proportional hazard models were risk-adjusted for race, year of hospitalization, rural-urban continuum code, year of index hospitalization, median income of zip code, and all matched covariates to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results:

A total of 10,460 patients in the ECT group and 31,160 in the control group were included in the analyses (total N=41,620; 65.4% female; mean age, 74.7 years [SD=7.09]). Compared with the control group, patients receiving ECT had lower all-cause mortality for up to 1 year following hospital discharge (adjusted hazard ratio=0.61, 95% CI=0.56, 0.66). For death by suicide, 1-year survival analysis showed no group difference. A significant association was observed with suicide in the first months following ECT, but this pattern waned over time (1 month: hazard ratio=0.44, 95% CI=0.21, 0.91; 2 months: hazard ratio=0.52, 95% CI=0.29, 0.92; 3 months: hazard ratio=0.56, 95% CI=0.37, 0.92; 6 months: 0.87, 95% CI=0.59, 1.28; 12 months: 0.92, 95% CI=0.68, 1.25).

Conclusions:

In this observational study, ECT was associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality and with short-lived protective effects on suicide risk. These findings support greater consideration of ECT for inpatients with mood disorders at short-term risk of suicide.
Mood disorders, including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, are a leading cause of disability worldwide (1). Individuals who suffer from mood disorders are at greater risk for premature mortality compared with the general population. For males, this translates to approximately 10 years of life expectancy lost for individuals with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder; among females, 7–11 years of life expectancy are lost (2). This increased risk of mortality has been reported across several causes of mortality, including suicide, cardiovascular disease, and cancer (35). The risk of premature mortality is also considerably higher among individuals with psychosis compared with the general population (6).
With respect to suicide, the period immediately following psychiatric hospitalization is one of markedly elevated risk. In one report on Medicaid patients, suicide rates per 100,000 person-years were 235 for major depression, 216 for bipolar disorder, and 168 for schizophrenia in the 3 months following psychiatric hospitalization (7). Studies in Europe have documented similar findings (8). Inpatients who were not well connected to outpatient health care in the 6 months before admission are also at increased short-term suicide risk (7), which suggests that at least part of the increased risk is mediated by the poor transition of care that occurs as patients shift from inpatient to outpatient care.
Some research suggests that ECT may reduce all-cause mortality. However, narrow target populations, small sample sizes, and concerns over confounder control cast some uncertainty over this work. The most recent study, which reported decreased mortality and suicide risk over an 8-year follow-up for adults with major depression or posttraumatic stress disorder (9), was from a single Veterans Health Administration center and included 92 ECT patients and therefore may not generalize to broader practice. A larger study of 783 ECT patients in the United Kingdom also found lower mortality among those receiving ECT than among a comparison cohort; however, that study did not account for potentially confounding baseline clinical differences between cohorts (10). In addition, an early cohort study of 135 ECT patients from a single state psychiatric hospital (11) reported a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, but that study also did not control for baseline clinical differences between study cohorts. By contrast, an early study from upstate New York (12) found higher mortality among depressed inpatients receiving ECT compared with those not receiving ECT. However, that study also did not account for potential confounding patient characteristics other than age.
Studies on the effects of ECT on suicide have been inconsistent. Early studies comparing suicide rates across eras (i.e., when ECT was the primary approach to treating psychiatric disorders in the 1940s compared with when ECT was not yet available in the 1930s) suggested an effect on suicide but were subject to methodological limitations such as cohort effects (13, 14). Some later studies showed a long-term association of ECT with lower rates of suicide but were limited to a single site (9) or were conducted in areas of the world where ECT is much more common and is used on less severely ill patients (15). A recent large multisite cohort analysis of Veterans Health Administration hospitals showed no effect on suicide over a 1-year follow-up period (16).
In the present study, we examined the association of ECT with important clinical outcomes—all-cause mortality and suicide—in a large, nationally representative cohort of Medicare patients. Given that ECT is particularly effective in older adults (17, 18), we chose to focus our analyses on older patients.

METHODS

Data Source

The data for this study were obtained from the Medicare fee-for-service claims database (including Part D) and the National Death Index from 2010 to 2016, the most recently available data at the time the study was initiated. The Medicare data are derived from claims records, including the Master Beneficiary Summary File, Part D Event Drug files, outpatient and inpatient files, and carrier files.

Sample

Data from all older Medicare beneficiaries (≥65 years old) who received any ECT procedures from 2010 to 2015 (identified by CPT code 90870 or 90871, ICD-9 code 94.27, or ICD-10 codes GZB0ZZZ–GZB4ZZZ) were obtained. We also obtained data from a 25% random sample of all Medicare beneficiaries age 65 or older who had codes for major depressive disorder during this period (ICD-9-CM codes 296.2x, 296.3x; ICD-10-CM codes F32.x and F33.x). To facilitate an appropriate index date, we restricted the analysis to inpatients.

Analytic Sample

Medicare beneficiaries were required to be age 65 or older, have continuous Medicare coverage (fee-for-service and Part D) for the 12 months before index date (see below), and have a psychiatric hospitalization (based on principal hospital diagnosis; see Table S1 in the online supplement) between 2011 and 2015. Individuals in U.S. territories were not included.

Exact Matching, Index Date

ECT patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio with patients who did not receive ECT. The index date for ECT patients was defined as the discharge date of the first observed hospitalization with ECT treatment. The index date for the control cohort of patients not receiving ECT was the discharge date of a psychiatric hospitalization meeting the matching parameters. Index hospitalization for the control group was chosen such that the number of psychiatric hospitalizations in the preindex period matched that of the ECT group. Exact matching was used to create comparable cohorts in regard to measured factors that are most strongly related to risk of suicide and all-cause mortality (7, 19, 20). These included gender, age, number of medically injurious suicide attempts in the previous year (as identified by ICD E-codes E950–E959), number of psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous year, principal diagnosis of the index hospitalization (to the fourth digit of ICD code), and modified Elixhauser comorbidity index (20), a measure of medical mortality risk. Additional variables (including race, rural-urban continuum code, U.S. Census region, median income of zip code, and psychotropic medications prescribed in the previous year) were included as covariates in Cox proportional hazard models.
The length of stay of the index hospitalization was imbalanced between groups, with ECT patients having longer inpatient stays. This was likely in part because many ECT centers do not provide outpatient ECT; providers thus will keep patients in the hospital to allow for them to finish a course of ECT, which lengthens their overall hospital stay. A sensitivity analysis was conducted using length of stay in the matching algorithm. A 1:1 matching ratio was used in this analysis to allow for matching with more parameters.
Limiting the control cohort to patients hospitalized for psychiatric disorders but not receiving ECT created a comparable cohort of patients who, similar to those in the ECT cohort, required an active inpatient intervention to ameliorate symptoms leading to hospitalization. Use of an active comparator has been shown to minimize bias in observational cohort studies (21).

Exposure

In our primary analysis, we defined exposure to ECT as having had one or more ECT treatments during the index hospitalization. This is a conservative definition of exposure that is analogous to an intent-to-treat approach in clinical trials, given that some patients stop treatment early because of adverse events. We also conducted a secondary analysis (analogous to a per protocol approach in clinical trials) including only individuals who were likely to have received at least a minimally adequate course of ECT, defined as having five or more ECT sessions within a 30-day period, as in previous reports (22).

Outcomes

The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and suicide death, as recorded in the National Death Index. The National Death Index is maintained by the National Center for Health Statistics and is regarded as the most authoritative source of death information for the U.S. population, including over 99% of all deaths in the United States (2326). These data provide date and cause of death using ICD-10 codes. The definition of suicide death included mechanisms such as injury/poisoning with undetermined intent (Y10–Y34) classified as probable suicide deaths (see Table S2 in the online supplement).

Analysis

We compared the matched ECT and non-ECT patient groups on measured characteristics before index date. Covariate balance was compared using standardized differences for all baseline covariates between the ECT and non-ECT groups. We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to model the effect of ECT on all-cause mortality and suicide death for up to 1 year after index date (hospitalization discharge date). The analyses were adjusted for all matched variables and race/ethnicity, rural-urban continuum codes, year of hospitalization, median income of zip code, and psychotropic medications. We report the adjusted hazard ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days. Our primary analysis included any patient who received one or more ECT sessions and matched control subjects (i.e., intent-to-treat analysis). A secondary analysis categorized patients into those who received a therapeutic course (five or more ECT sessions within the first 30 days), those who received a subtherapeutic course (less than five sessions), and their corresponding matched control subjects (i.e., per protocol analysis).
As an alternative to exact matching, a sensitivity analysis was performed using inverse probability treatment weighting. In this analysis, propensity scores (the probability of initiating ECT or not) were calculated using a logistic regression model, with covariates of age, gender, race, median income of zip code, U.S. region, psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous year, suicide attempts in the previous year, psychotropic medications prescribed in the previous year, year of hospitalization, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and principal hospital diagnosis (see Table S3 in the online supplement). Score distributions were trimmed at the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles to reduce potential unmeasured confounding bias by excluding patients treated contrary to strong predictions (27). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the effect of ECT on all-cause mortality and suicide death.
Analyses were performed with SAS, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.), R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna), and Stata, version 16 (College Station, Tex.). All p values were two-sided, with a value <0.05 indicating statistical significance. The study used de-identified data and was approved with a waiver of informed consent by the Yale School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

A total of 11,654 ECT patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (Figure 1). After matching, 1,194 (10.2%) ECT recipients had no suitable matches and were excluded from analysis; 10,460 ECT patients had at least one matched control subject, resulting in 31,160 matched control subjects. Of all patients who received at least one ECT session, 8,425 (82.9%) received five or more sessions within a 30-day period, which we categorized as the group likely to have received a therapeutic course of ECT. To avoid immortal time bias, we analyzed only the sample of those receiving a therapeutic course of ECT if they completed five treatments before discharge (N=6,670).
FIGURE 1. Flowchart of cohorts in a study of the association of ECT with risks of all-cause mortality and suicide among older Medicare patients
After the application of eligibility criteria and matching, ECT and control groups were well balanced in all matching characteristics: age, gender, principal hospital diagnosis, suicide attempts in the previous year, psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous year, and mean Elixhauser comorbidity index (Table 1). In addition, the study groups were also similar in year of index hospitalization, urban setting, region, and medication history in the previous year (except for antipsychotic and lithium use, which were higher in the ECT group). Consistent with previous research (28), those in the ECT group lived in areas with a higher median income and were more likely to be White compared with the control group. Notably, the ECT group had longer hospital admissions compared with the control group.
TABLE 1. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of older Medicare patients in a study of the association of ECT with risks of all-cause mortality and suicide
CharacteristicNo ECT (N=31,160)ECT (N=10,460)Standardized Difference
 N%N% 
Age category    <0.01
 65–74 years17,19655.25,76055.1 
 75–84 years10,60034.03,56434.1 
 ≥85 years3,36410.81,13610.9 
Female20,37965.46,83365.3<0.01
Year of index hospitalization    0.08
 20116,76521.72,37922.7 
 20126,54621.02,32422.2 
 20136,27820.22,10020.1 
 20145,68318.21,94618.6 
 20155,88818.91,71116.4 
Urban setting25,14980.78,94685.50.13
Modified Elixhauser comorbidity index    0.05
 08,69127.92,92127.9 
 1–56,09019.52,04919.6 
 6–128,61627.72,88927.6 
 >127,76324.92,60124.9 
Psychiatric hospitalizations in previous year    0.04
 018,90460.76,30660.3 
 17,64924.62,57224.6 
 22,7838.99509.1 
 ≥31,8245.96326.0 
Suicide attempts in previous year    0.15
 029,62395.19,91094.7 
 11,3514.34744.5 
 ≥21860.6760.7 
Race/ethnicity    0.29
 Non-Hispanic White26,84086.19,59791.8 
 Hispanic1,3464.32592.5 
 African American2,3977.73373.2 
 Other5061.62242.1 
Region    0.34
 Northeast7,21923.22,99528.6 
 South6,05419.43,00628.7 
 Midwest14,55346.73,36332.2 
 West3,33410.71,09610.5 
Principal hospital diagnosis    0.14
 Major depressive disorder22,00770.67,37270.5 
 Bipolar disorder5,80218.61,95718.7 
 Psychotic depression2780.91021.0 
 Schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder2,0346.56816.5 
 Other1,0393.33483.3 
 MeanSDMeanSD 
Length of stay of index hospitalization (days)11.211.825.117.20.94
 N%N% 
Median income of zip code    0.37
 <$40,0007,96725.61,44413.8 
 $40,000–$60,00012,70740.84,01038.3 
 ≥$60,0009,81831.54,86046.5 
Psychotropic medication use in previous year     
 Antidepressant17,79357.16,32960.50.07
 Lithium8382.77587.30.21
 Anticonvulsant mood stabilizer7,93925.52,71325.90.01
 Antipsychotic10,26432.94,75545.50.26

All-Cause Mortality

Compared with the control group, the ECT group had significantly lower all-cause mortality at all time points for up to 1 year (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% CI=0.56, 0.66). Survival curves are shown in Figure 2 for all ECT patients as well as for the subset who met criteria for a therapeutic course and for matched control subjects. Hazard ratios (adjusting for unmatched covariates) ranged from 0.53 to 0.61 (p<0.01 for all) for all patients who received at least one ECT session in the time points up to 1 year after index date (Figure 3). For the sample with only those who met criteria for a therapeutic course, hazard ratios ranged from 0.40 to 0.56 (p<0.01 for all) during this period. When the survival analysis included those who received five or more ECT sessions within 30 days (a therapeutic ECT course) and those who received a subtherapeutic course of ECT (less than five treatments within the first 30 days of treatment), those with a subtherapeutic course had a survival trajectory similar to those who did not receive ECT (Figure 2). Results of the model using inverse probability weighting yielded similar results (see Table S4 in the online supplement). In a sensitivity analysis that included length of stay in the matching algorithm (1:1 ratio), ECT was also associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (1-year hazard ratio=0.56, 95% CI=0.51, 0.61; see Table S5 in the online supplement).
FIGURE 2. Effect of ECT on all-cause mortality among older Medicare patientsa
a The analysis illustrated in panel A includes any patient who received one or more ECT sessions and matched control subjects (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% CI=0.55, 0.66). The analysis illustrated in panel B defines therapeutic ECT as patients who received five or more ECT sessions within 30 days (therapeutic course: hazard ratio=0.56, 95% CI=0.52, 0.61, compared with matched control subjects) and those who received fewer than five ECT sessions (subtherapeutic course; hazard ratio=0.80, 95% CI=0.69, 0.94). There was no difference in trajectory between control subjects matched to the therapeutic ECT group and those matched to the subtherapeutic ECT group; hence, they are shown here as a single group for clarity.
FIGURE 3. Forest plots showing effects of ECT on all-cause mortality and suicide death among hospitalized older Medicare patientsa
a Subjects are exact-matched on age, gender, Elixhauser comorbidity index, suicide attempt in previous year, psychiatric hospitalization in previous year, and principal hospital diagnosis; models are adjusted for race, rural-urban setting, year of hospitalization, median income of zip code, and psychotropic medications prescribed in the previous year. A therapeutic course is defined as having five or more ECT sessions within 30 days.
In exploring cause of death, we found that ECT patients were less likely to die from several broad mortality categories compared with patients in the control group, including circulatory diseases (1-year hazard ratio=0.63, 95% CI=0.58, 0.69), diabetes-related causes (hazard ratio=0.51, 95% CI=0.38, 0.69), smoking-related diseases (hazard ratio=0.45, 95% CI=0.38, 0.52), and cancer (hazard ratio=0.80, 95% CI=0.69, 0.93).

Suicide Death

Over 1-year of follow-up, there was not a significant difference between groups in rate of suicide death (Figure 4). In the full sample, adjusted hazard ratios suggested a lower risk of suicide in the 90 days following hospital discharge, but this association waned over time (Figure 3A). In the sample including only patients who likely received a therapeutic ECT course, adjusted hazard ratios suggested a similar trajectory, with a waning association over time (Figure 3B). An inverse probability weighting model yielded similar results, with statistically significant associations seen at 30, 60, and 90 days (see Table S4 in the online supplement). In a sensitivity analysis including length of stay in the matching with lower statistical power (1:1 ratio), the hazard ratio estimates were similar but not statistically significant at days 30, 60, and 90 (see Table S5 in the online supplement).
FIGURE 4. Effect of ECT on suicide death among older Medicare patientsa
a The analysis illustrated in panel A includes all patients who received one or more ECT session and matched control subjects (1-year hazard ratio=0.92, 95% CI=0.68, 1.25). The analysis illustrated in panel B includes patients who received a therapeutic ECT course (defined as having received five or more ECT sessions within 30 days; hazard ratio=0.82, 95% CI=0.58, 1.16, compared with matched control subjects), those who received a subtherapeutic course (defined as having had fewer than five ECT sessions; hazard ratio=1.34, 95% CI=0.73, 2.46), and matched control subjects. There was no difference in trajectory between control subjects matched to the therapeutic ECT group and those matched to the subtherapeutic ECT group; hence, they are shown here as a single group for clarity.

DISCUSSION

In a large sample of older Medicare psychiatric inpatients, ECT was associated with a protective though short-lived effect on suicide risk and an enduring protective effect on all-cause mortality risk. As compared with matched patients who did not receive ECT, patients who received ECT had a lower suicide rate during the 3 months following discharge. However, this association was not observed at 6 or 12 months. Patients who received ECT had a lower rate of all-cause mortality for up to 12 months following treatment, consistent with previous research (9, 11, 29).

ECT and All-Cause Mortality

Our finding suggesting that ECT is protective against all-cause mortality generates further evidence consistent with earlier reports (9, 11, 29). Given that this study was not a randomized trial, concern for residual confounding exists. One alternative hypothesis is that patients who are severely medically ill are not selected for ECT because of the medical risk of the procedure. While this may contribute to the difference observed, the finding that those receiving a subtherapeutic course of ECT have a similar survival curve in the first 6 months compared with those who do not receive ECT does not support this alternative hypothesis. It should be noted that patients who received ECT were more likely to be from higher-income zip codes and were slightly more likely than patients in the control group to be White; however, even after accounting for these potential confounders, including the Elixhauser comorbidity index in the adjusted hazard models and inverse probability weighting, a robust association of ECT with lower mortality persisted.
In exploring categories of mortality, ECT patients were less likely to die from a number of causes, including smoking-related diseases, cancer (excluding smoking-related cancer), circulatory disease, diabetes, and substance use. While several mechanisms may be at play, one potential way in which ECT might lead to reduction in mortality risk is that improved functioning following ECT allows patients to maintain a healthier lifestyle and to better engage in treatment for whatever medical conditions they face.

ECT and Suicide

Previous studies on the effects of ECT on suicide have yielded inconsistent results (29). Nonetheless, treatment guidelines from APA specifically recommend the use of ECT for patients with acute suicidal ideation (30). A recent observational study by Peltzman et al. (16) examined ECT and suicide using Veterans Health Administration electronic medical record data. The study did not find an effect of ECT on suicide in veterans, although it did not look at outcomes prior to the 12-month time point. Although not specifically explored in this study, it would be expected (31) that the majority of veteran ECT recipients had stopped treatment before the 12-month follow-up, when the effects of an acute treatment series have long worn off. The data in the present study suggest that there may be an early association between ECT and reduced suicide risk for 3–6 months but that the association diminishes with time as the antidepressant effects of ECT wear off. This is in line with the traditional understanding of the treatment course of ECT, where a large portion of ECT patients relapse after 6 months without a continuation treatment (32).

Limitations

Several limitations of this study require comment. In evaluating the association between ECT and suicide risk, it is important to bear in mind that it was not possible to control for several suicide risk factors, such as a lifetime history of suicide attempts (33) and a family history of suicide (34), that may have confounded and therefore biased the observed association of ECT with short-term suicide risk. Without an understanding of the mechanisms connecting ECT to suicide risk, the short-term protective associations should be interpreted with caution. In some cases, it is expected that unmeasured confounding with respect to depression severity and suicide risk may bias against ECT. In other cases, however, ECT is more commonly available to those of higher socioeconomic means, who may have lower risks of all-cause mortality (35) or suicide (36). Another limitation is that we were unable to ascertain reasons for discontinuing ECT if a full course was not completed. It would be reasonable to assume that discontinuation was often related to intolerable side effects or lack of efficacy; however, other reasons may have contributed, such as administrative barriers during the transition from inpatient to outpatient care. A third limitation of this study is that changes in coding from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM occurred during the study period. However, the minimal differences between groups in the year of index hospitalization (a standardized difference of 0.08) mitigates concern that this is a substantial cause of bias. Furthermore, the year of index hospitalization was included as a covariate in the hazard regression models. Finally, as our study focused on patients age 65 or older, the findings may not generalize to populations under age 65.
In summary, in this large observational study, ECT was associated with a consistently lower risk of all-cause mortality and a reduced though short-lived association with the risk of suicide death. This report adds to a growing body of research suggesting a positive effect of ECT from a population health perspective (37, 38). Future efforts should focus on ways to ensure broader implementation of this treatment and to improve the maintenance therapy of severely ill patients who receive ECT.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.ajp.2021.21040351.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
World Health Organization: Depression (fact sheet). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression. January 30, 2020
2.
Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, et al: Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS One 2011; 6:e19590
3.
Lemogne C, Nabi H, Melchior M, et al: Mortality associated with depression as compared with other severe mental disorders: a 20-year follow-up study of the GAZEL cohort. J Psychiatr Res 2013; 47:851–857
4.
Lemogne C, Niedhammer I, Khlat M, et al: Gender differences in the association between depressive mood and mortality: a 12-year follow-up population-based study. J Affect Disord 2012; 136:267–275
5.
Pinquart M, Duberstein PR: Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1797–1810
6.
Walker ER, McGee RE, Druss BG: Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72:334–341
7.
Olfson M, Wall M, Wang S, et al: Short-term suicide risk after psychiatric hospital discharge. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73:1119–1126
8.
Nordentoft M, Mortensen PB, Pedersen CB: Absolute risk of suicide after first hospital contact in mental disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68:1058–1064
9.
Ahmadi N, Moss L, Simon E, et al: Efficacy and long-term clinical outcome of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder after electroconvulsive therapy. Depress Anxiety 2016; 33:640–647
10.
Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Videbech P, et al: All-cause mortality among recipients of electroconvulsive therapy: register-based cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190:435–439
11.
Avery D, Winokur G: Mortality in depressed patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy and antidepressants. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33:1029–1037
12.
Babigian HM, Guttmacher LB: Epidemiologic considerations in electroconvulsive therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41:246–253
13.
Huston PE, Locher LM: Involutional psychosis: course when untreated and when treated with electric shock. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1948; 59:385–394
14.
Huston PE, Locher LM: Manic-depressive psychosis: course when treated and untreated with electric shock. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1948; 60:37–48
15.
Liang CS, Chung CH, Ho PS, et al: Superior anti-suicidal effects of electroconvulsive therapy in unipolar disorder and bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20:539–546
16.
Peltzman T, Shiner B, Watts BV: Effects of electroconvulsive therapy on short-term suicide mortality in a risk-matched patient population. J ECT 2020; 36:187–192
17.
American Psychiatric Association: The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy: Recommendations for Treatment, Training, and Privileging, 2nd ed (A Task Force Report of the American Psychiatric Association). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2001
18.
Greenberg RM, Kellner CH: Electroconvulsive therapy: a selected review. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 13:268–281
19.
Kessler RC, Warner CH, Ivany C, et al: Predicting suicides after psychiatric hospitalization in US Army soldiers: the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). JAMA Psychiatry 2015; 72:49–57
20.
van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, et al: A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 2009; 47:626–633
21.
Velentgas P, Dreyer NA, Nourjah P, et al. (eds): Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User’s Guide. Rockville, Md, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013
22.
Rhee TG, Olfson M, Sint K, Wilkinson ST. Characterization of the quality of electroconvulsive therapy among older Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81:19m13186
23.
Lash TL, Silliman RA: A comparison of the National Death Index and Social Security Administration databases to ascertain vital status. Epidemiology 2001; 12:259–261
24.
Patterson BH, Bilgrad R: Use of the National Death Index in cancer studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986; 77:877–881
25.
Rich-Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ: Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140:1016–1019
26.
Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Abdalla O: Using the National Death Index to obtain underlying cause of death codes. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40:808–813
27.
Stürmer T, Rothman KJ, Avorn J, et al: Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172:843–854
28.
Olfson M, Marcus S, Sackeim HA, et al: Use of ECT for the inpatient treatment of recurrent major depression. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:22–29
29.
Prudic J, Sackeim HA: Electroconvulsive therapy and suicide risk. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60(suppl 2):104–110
30.
American Psychiatric Association: Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder, 3rd ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2010
31.
Rhee TG, Olfson M, Sint K, et al: Characterization of the quality of electroconvulsive therapy among older Medicare beneficiaries. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81:81
32.
Sackeim HA, Haskett RF, Mulsant BH, et al: Continuation pharmacotherapy in the prevention of relapse following electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285:1299–1307
33.
Bostwick JM, Pabbati C, Geske JR, et al: Suicide attempt as a risk factor for completed suicide: even more lethal than we knew. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173:1094–1100
34.
Qin P, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB: Suicide risk in relation to family history of completed suicide and psychiatric disorders: a nested case-control study based on longitudinal registers. Lancet 2002; 360:1126–1130
35.
Bassuk SS, Berkman LF, Amick BC 3rd: Socioeconomic status and mortality among the elderly: findings from four US communities. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155:520–533
36.
Olfson M, Cosgrove C, Altekruse SF, et al: Deaths of despair: adults at high risk for death by suicide, poisoning, or chronic liver disease in the US. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40:505–512
37.
Slade EP, Jahn DR, Regenold WT, et al: Association of electroconvulsive therapy with psychiatric readmissions in US hospitals. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:798–804
38.
Ross EL, Zivin K, Maixner DF: Cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy vs pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75:713–722

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 1089 - 1097
PubMed: 34503341

History

Received: 8 April 2021
Revision received: 24 May 2021
Accepted: 12 July 2021
Published online: 10 September 2021
Published in print: December 2021

Keywords

  1. Depressive Disorders
  2. Major Depressive Disorder
  3. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
  4. Suicide and Self-Harm
  5. Bipolar and Related Disorders

Authors

Details

Taeho Greg Rhee, Ph.D.
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).
Kyaw Sint, Ph.D.
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).
Mark Olfson, M.D., M.P.H.
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).
Tobias Gerhard, Ph.D.
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).
Susan H. Busch, Ph.D.
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).
Samuel T. Wilkinson, M.D. [email protected]
Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington (Rhee); Yale Depression Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Rhee, Wilkinson); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. (Sint); Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Olfson); Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science and Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, N.J. (Gerhard); Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. (Busch); Interventional Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Wilkinson).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Wilkinson ([email protected]).

Competing Interests

Dr. Gerhard has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Eisai, and Intra-Cellular Therapies. Dr. Wilkinson has received contract funding from Janssen, Oui Therapeutics, and Sage Therapeutics for the conduct of clinical trials administered through Yale University, and he has received consulting fees from Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Oui Therapeutics, and Sage Therapeutics. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Funding Information

Supported by NIMH grant R21MH117438 and by a young investigator grant (to Dr. Wilkinson) from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. Dr. Wilkinson also acknowledges support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS023000).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share