The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Sections

Why and When to Use Standardized Assessment Measures | Types of Standardized Measures | Psychometric Criteria | Selecting Measures | Use and Interpretation of Measures in Routine Care | Use of Clinical Data to Inform Shared Decision Making | Case Examples | Integration of Measurement-Based Care Into Routine Practice | Conclusion | References

Excerpt

The assessment process requires the clinician to make decisions by formulating, testing, and refining hypotheses based on clinical information that is often incomplete or inconsistent, often in the context of very brief clinical encounters. Evidence has been mounting for decades that in such contexts, subjective clinical judgment does not yield diagnoses that are as accurate or comprehensive as standardized diagnostic measures. Consequently, evidence-based assessment is now recognized as a key component of evidence-based care. The American Psychiatric Association guidelines recommend that “the initial psychiatric evaluation of a patient include quantitative measures of symptoms, level of functioning, and quality of life” (American Psychiatric Association Work Group on Psychiatric Evaluation 2016, p. 35). More recent research findings suggest that quantitative measures should be used not just at initial evaluation but also over the course of treatment to measure patient health and symptoms. Integrating the routine use of measurement within clinical care has been shown to result in faster improvement in client outcomes, including symptoms, interpersonal functioning, and quality of life, than routine care without ongoing assessment, particularly among patients at risk for deterioration (Bickman et al. 2011; Lambert et al. 2003). The Joint Commission (2017) has recognized the value of ongoing assessment, specifying that behavioral health care organizations should use standardized tools or instruments to monitor patient progress.

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Institutional Login
  • Sign in via OpenAthens
  • Register for access
  • Please login/register if you wish to pair your device and check access availability.

    Not a subscriber?

    Subscribe Now / Learn More

    PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

    Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).