Risk of Incarceration and Other Characteristics of Iraq and Afghanistan Era Veterans in State and Federal Prisons
Abstract
Objective
The Health Care for Reentry Veterans (HCRV) program provides Veterans Health Administration outreach services to veterans incarcerated in state and federal prisons. This study used HCRV data to compare risk of incarceration of veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF), Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and New Dawn (OND) and other veterans and to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of incarcerated veterans of OEF/OIF/OND.
Methods
Administrative national data were analyzed for 30,968 incarcerated veterans, including 1,201 OEF/OIF/OND veterans, contacted from October 2007 to April 2011. Odds ratios were calculated comparing the risk of incarceration among OEF/OIF/OND and other veterans in the HCRV sample and in a weighted sample of nonincarcerated veterans from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans. Stepwise logistic regressions of HCRV data examined characteristics of incarcerated veterans independently associated with OEF/OIF/OND service.
Results
Regardless of ethnicity or age, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were less than half as likely as other veterans to be incarcerated and constituted only 3.9% of the incarcerated veterans. Compared with other incarcerated veterans, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were younger, were more likely to be married, were more likely to report combat exposure, expected a shorter incarceration, were 26% less likely to have a diagnosis of drug abuse or dependence, and were three times more likely to have combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Conclusions
OEF/OIF/OND veterans appeared to be at lower risk of incarceration than veterans of other service eras, but those who were incarcerated had higher rates of PTSD. Efforts to link these veterans to mental health services upon their release are warranted.
Criminal justice involvement and incarceration among American military veterans, especially those who have served in combat, have long been of national concern. There was much expectation that Vietnam veterans would be at high risk of incarceration because of combat trauma, but recent research suggests that premilitary factors are more important than combat exposure in predicting antisocial behavior and incarceration (1,2).
More recently, stories have appeared in the press about criminal behavior and incarceration of veterans who have served in the Middle East in Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF), Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and New Dawn (OND) (3,4). However, the risk of incarceration among this new generation of veterans compared with the general population of veterans has yet to be studied, and so far there is no empirical research on the general characteristics, potential risk factors, and crimes of incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans.
According to a recent report by the U.S. Department of Justice (5), about 10% of prison inmates are veterans. The incarceration rate of veterans (630 per 100,000) is less than half that of nonveterans (1,390 per 100,000), a circumstance that may be explained largely by age, given that in the general population, veterans are considerably older than nonveterans. The report also indicated that like the veteran population as a whole, a majority of incarcerated veterans served during a wartime period; however, only 20%–26% reported seeing combat duty. Yet data about the characteristics of incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans, who are likely to be younger and more likely to have been exposed to war trauma, are not available. Examining these characteristics is important because they may have implications for prevention of incarceration, for treatment, and for delivery of prisoner reentry services among OEF/OIF/OND veterans.
Studies of earlier generations of veterans found that veterans with histories of incarceration have an increased risk of psychiatric problems, substance abuse and dependence, and homelessness compared with veterans with no incarceration history (6,7). Examination of the association of incarceration and homelessness among both veterans (6) and nonveterans (8) suggested that a cluster of nonmilitary-related factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, substance abuse and dependence, and mental illness, may be key risk factors for both conditions (5).
In 2007, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) created a systemwide outreach program called Health Care for Reentry Veterans (HCRV) to facilitate connection with VHA services among incarcerated veterans upon their release from state and federal prisons. The HCRV program was launched under the umbrella of the Veterans Affairs (VA) homeless services with the intention of preventing both reincarceration and future homelessness.
This study represents the first examination of veterans served by the HCRV program. It compared the risk of incarceration of OEF/OIF/OND veterans and other veterans in the general population stratified by age, gender, and race. It also compared the characteristics of incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans and other incarcerated veterans to identify factors that may have put the OEF/OIF/OND veterans at risk for incarceration.
Methods
Program description
The HCRV program was established to assist incarcerated veterans in accessing VHA services upon their release into the community with the ultimate goal of preventing both reincarceration and future homelessness. Each HCRV program consists of specialists who provide outreach to veterans in state and federal prisons. The specialists partner with state and federal correctional staff to meet with incarcerated veterans who are close to their release date to conduct prerelease assessments. They also facilitate postrelease linkages and provide short-term clinical management after release.
HCRV specialists, mostly social workers, help incarcerated veterans develop plans to connect to pension and compensation benefits as well as to medical and mental health services and to vocational and residential services. Contacts with veterans while they are incarcerated are limited to assessment and planning for postrelease treatment, and no formal VHA medical services are delivered in the incarceration setting. Thus HCRV specialists focus on initiating contact with incarcerated veterans to help them access VHA services after their release.
Because HCRV does not identify or target veterans with particular health problems or who served in a particular military service area or era, the data available from the program may be representative of the incarcerated veteran population, having no obvious tendency to under- or overrepresent certain groups. However, the data are from only one national, albeit geographically representative, program, so the extent to which they are completely representative of incarcerated veterans on all variables is unknown.
Data source
Administrative national data summarizing outreach assessments by the HCRV program of 30,968 veterans contacted from October 2007 to April 2011 were obtained for analysis.
Population data for a weighted sample of nonincarcerated veterans from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans (9) were used to compare the odds of being an OEF/OIF/OND veteran in age-race cohorts of the incarcerated sample with those of being an OEF/OIF/OND veteran among domiciled veterans nationally. Odds ratios comparing these samples were used to estimate and compare the risk of incarceration among various strata of the population of OEF/OIF/OND veterans and other veterans.
The 2010 National Survey of Veterans was a comprehensive nationwide mail survey that collected information about veteran characteristics and health service use. A total of 8,710 veterans participated, and the data were weighted to incorporate the probability of selection and survey nonresponse and were poststratified to known population totals to be representative of the entire noninstitutionalized veteran population.
Measures
Administrative data were based on information obtained by HCRV specialists in face-to-face interviews of incarcerated veterans. The specialists used a structured assessment form to collect information about sociodemographic characteristics, criminal history, clinical status, homelessness history, and service needs.
Sociodemographic characteristics.
Information was collected about sociodemographic characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, military history, and combat exposure. Service in OEF/OIF/OND was defined as serving in theaters of operations in Iraq or Afghanistan. Combat exposure was defined as receiving hostile or friendly fire in a combat zone.
Criminal history.
The offense related to the current incarceration was classified into six categories: violent offenses (for example, murder, manslaughter, assault, or robbery), property offenses (for example, burglary, motor vehicle theft, stolen property, arson, or vandalism), drug offenses (for example, possession or trafficking), public order offenses (for example, weapons offense, prostitution, public intoxication, or driving under the influence), a probation or parole violation, or other or unspecified offenses. Clients were also asked whether they had been drinking alcohol or using drugs at the time of the offense.
The expected length of the client’s current incarceration, which included any time in prison, was calculated from information provided by the clients about their release date.
Clients were asked the age at which they were first arrested and how many times they had been arrested in their lifetime before their most current incarceration.
Clinical status.
Clients were asked whether they had any serious medical problems. Psychiatric diagnoses were made by the HCRV specialist on the basis of observations and assessment and client’s self-reported history.
Clients were asked whether they had used any VA services in the past six months and if they were interested and were willing to participate in each of five different VA services: psychiatric or substance abuse treatment, medical services, residential treatment services (including the grant and per diem program), social-vocational assistance (including the compensated work therapy program and the incentive therapy program), and case management services.
Homelessness history.
Length of current homelessness was defined as the time between last being housed for 30 days or more, according to the client’s report, and the current incarceration. Homelessness history was assessed by asking clients how many separate episodes of homelessness they had experienced in the previous three years.
Data analysis
To examine the risk of incarceration among OEF/OIF/OND veterans compared with other veterans in the general population, the odds of being an OEF/OIF/OND veteran in the incarcerated sample were compared with the odds of being an OEF/OIF/OND veteran in the weighted population of nonincarcerated veterans according to the 2010 National Survey of Veterans. Odds ratios stratified by age groups were calculated. Supplementary analyses examining these odds ratios by gender and race were conducted.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the histories of homelessness of all veterans assessed by the HCRV program. Bivariate analyses, including t tests and chi square tests, were conducted to compare these characteristics among the incarcerated OEF/OID/OND and non–OEF/OID/OND veterans. Appropriate corrections were made for continuous variables that violated Levene’s test for equality of variances.
Multivariate analyses using backward stepwise logistic regressions were conducted to examine the independent associations of these characteristics to predict OEF/OIF/OND status. Only variables identified as significant in bivariate analyses were included in the multivariate analyses. To adjust for multiple comparisons and inflated type I error, all statistical tests described above were conducted at the .01 level with the statistical software SPSS, version 17.0 (10).
Results
Of the total sample of 30,968 veterans assessed by the HCRV program, 1,201 (3.9%) were veterans of OEF/OIF/OND. Among the 29,767 (96.1%) other veterans, 3.0% (N=893) served before the Vietnam War, 27.9% (N=8,305) during the Vietnam War era, 47.8% (N=14,229) during the post-Vietnam era, and 18.7% (N=5,566) during the Persian Gulf War. A total of 2.6% (N=774) served after September 11, 2001, but were not deployed for OEF/OIF/OND.
National representative data from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans were used to compare the risk of incarceration among nonincarcerated veterans and OEF/OIF/OND veterans in HCRV. As Table 1 shows, across age groups, even the youngest, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were less than half as likely as other veterans to be incarcerated. This remained true for analyses of only males, only whites, only blacks, and only Hispanics (who may also have identified themselves as white or black).
| OEF/OIF/OND veterans | Other veterans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Nonincarcerated (N=1,789,171) | Incarcerated (N=1,199) | Nonincarcerated (N=18,967,169) | Incarcerated (N=29,751) | ORb | 95% CIc |
| All veterans | ||||||
| 20–29 years | 501,974 | 638 | 329,942 | 1,395 | .30 | .24–.38 |
| 30–39 years | 470,083 | 375 | 806,872 | 3,661 | .18 | .14–.22 |
| 40–49 years | 477,246 | 149 | 2,497,942 | 10,368 | .08 | .06–.09 |
| 50–59 years | 204,319 | 33 | 3,598,472 | 10,569 | .06 | .04–.08 |
| ≥60 years | 135,549 | 4 | 11,733,941 | 3,754 | .09 | .03–.26 |
| Males only | 1,283,114 | 1,174 | 15,770,128 | 29,270 | ||
| 20–29 years | 377,495 | 625 | 236,262 | 1,332 | .29 | .22–.39 |
| 30–39 years | 304,255 | 367 | 514,936 | 3,530 | .18 | .14–.22 |
| 40–49 years | 336,309 | 143 | 1,737,108 | 10,166 | .07 | .06–.09 |
| 50–59 years | 146,305 | 33 | 2,733,655 | 10,482 | .06 | .04–.09 |
| ≥60 years | 118,749 | 4 | 10,548,167 | 3,741 | .10 | .03–.21 |
| Whites only | 1,306,136 | 718 | 15,882,586 | 15,384 | ||
| 20–29 years | 339,476 | 390 | 225,880 | 862 | .30 | .22–.41 |
| 30–39 years | 368,927 | 224 | 627,977 | 1,947 | .20 | .15–.25 |
| 40–49 years | 335,687 | 89 | 1,820,921 | 4,954 | .12 | .07–.13 |
| 50–59 years | 156,555 | 14 | 2,687,107 | 5,100 | .05 | .03–.09 |
| ≥60 years | 105,491 | 0 | 10,520,700 | 2,507 | .00 | .00–.00 |
| Blacks only | 296,800 | 308 | 1,938,478 | 11,634 | ||
| 20–29 years | 74,698 | 152 | 75,073 | 375 | .42 | .23–.70 |
| 30–39 years | 66,096 | 93 | 121,422 | 1,291 | .13 | .08–.22 |
| 40–49 years | 104,069 | 43 | 461,586 | 4,463 | .04 | .03–.07 |
| 50–59 years | 34,247 | 15 | 613,676 | 4,570 | .06 | .03–.13 |
| ≥60 years | 17,690 | 4 | 666,721 | 935 | .16 | .05–.55 |
| Hispanics only | 1,514,173 | 127 | 16,976,705 | 1,897 | ||
| 20–29 years | 416,447 | 71 | 293,084 | 106 | .47 | .33–4.15 |
| 30–39 years | 389,145 | 43 | 735,454 | 293 | .28 | .09–2.25 |
| 40–49 years | 419,643 | 9 | 2,262,004 | 680 | .07 | .02–.15 |
| 50–59 years | 185,006 | 4 | 3,190,619 | 608 | .11 | .04–3.24 |
| ≥60 years | 103,932 | 0 | 10,395,543 | 209 | .00 | .00–.00 |
a
OEF, Operation Enduring Freedom. OIF, Operation Iraqi Freedom. OND, Operation New Dawn. Data about incarcerated veterans were collected between October 2007 and April 2011 by the Health Care for Reentry Veterans (HCRV) program, and data about nonincarcerated veterans were from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans. HCRV data about veterans younger than 19 years were excluded from the analyses of the total group and blacks only (2 OEF/OIF/OND veterans and 16 other veterans), males only (2 OEF/OIF/OND veterans and 15 other veterans), whites only (1 OEF/OIF/OND veteran and 14 other veterans), and Hispanics only (1 other veteran).
b
Odds of being incarcerated among OEF/OIF/OND versus other veterans
c
Calculated on the basis of the original sample size of the 2010 National Survey of Veterans rather than the weighted population estimate
Table 2 shows the sociodemographic characteristics, criminal history, clinical status, and homelessness history of all veterans in the HCRV program. A majority of veterans were unmarried white men in their late forties who did not report combat exposure, were not working, and had little income in the past month. At the time of interview, veterans had been incarcerated for an average of over four years, and the most common current incarceration offense was a violent offense, property offense, or drug offense. Veterans reported an average age at their first arrest of 26 and an average of eight lifetime arrests. Nearly half reported using substances at the time of offense, but the response rate for that question was only 55.6%.
| All veterans (N=30,968) | OEF/OIF/OND veterans (N=1,201) | Other veterans (N=29,767) | Test of difference | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | N respondents | N | % | N respondents | N | % | N respondents | N | % | t | χ2 | df |
| Age | 30,964 | 48.43±10.57 | 1,201 | 32.04±7.64 | 29,763 | 49.09±10.13 | 74.76** | 1,376 | ||||
| Male gender | 30,968 | 30,444 | 98.3 | 1,201 | 1,174 | 97.8 | 29,767 | 30,019 | 98.3 | 2.32 | 1 | |
| Ethnicity | 30,834 | 1,197 | 29,637 | |||||||||
| White | 16,103 | 52.2 | 718 | 60.0 | 15,385 | 51.9 | 107.03** | 3 | ||||
| Black | 11,944 | 38.7 | 308 | 25.7 | 11,636 | 39.3 | ||||||
| Hispanic | 2,025 | 6.7 | 127 | 10.6 | 1,898 | 6.4 | ||||||
| Other | 762 | 2.5 | 44 | 3.7 | 718 | 2.4 | ||||||
| Marital status | 30,950 | 1,201 | 29,749 | |||||||||
| Married | 4,639 | 15.0 | 251 | 20.9 | 4,388 | 14.8 | 2 | |||||
| Widowed, separated, or divorced | 17,694 | 57.2 | 479 | 39.9 | 17,215 | 57.9 | 152.51** | |||||
| Never married | 8,617 | 27.8 | 471 | 39.2 | 8,146 | 27.4 | ||||||
| Combat exposure | 30,863 | 4,553 | 14.8 | 1,195 | 832 | 69.6 | 29,668 | 3,721 | 12.6 | 2976.21** | 1 | |
| Days worked in past month | 30,946 | 4.69 | 9.1 | 1,201 | 4.46 | 9.0 | 29,745 | 4.70 | 9.1 | .88 | 1,301 | |
| Total income in past month | 30,811 | 1,186 | 29,625 | |||||||||
| No income | 20,091 | 65.2 | 733 | 61.8 | 19,358 | 65.3 | ||||||
| $1–$99 | 7,572 | 24.6 | 265 | 22.3 | 7,307 | 24.7 | 47.28** | 4 | ||||
| $100–$499 | 1,878 | 6.1 | 104 | 8.8 | 1,774 | 6.0 | ||||||
| $500–$999 | 585 | 1.9 | 34 | 2.9 | 551 | 1.9 | ||||||
| ≥$1,000 | 685 | 2.2 | 50 | 4.2 | 635 | 2.1 | ||||||
| Current offense | ||||||||||||
| Violent offense | 28,472 | 9,995 | 35.1 | 1,124 | 422 | 37.5 | 27,348 | 9,573 | 35.0 | 3.06 | 1 | |
| Property offense | 28,237 | 7,112 | 25.2 | 1,116 | 281 | 25.2 | 27,121 | 6,831 | 25.2 | .00 | 1 | |
| Drug offense | 28,222 | 6,851 | 24.3 | 1,115 | 242 | 21.7 | 27,107 | 6,609 | 24.4 | 4.18 | 1 | |
| Public order offense | 27,919 | 4,326 | 15.5 | 1,106 | 189 | 17.1 | 26,813 | 4,137 | 15.4 | 2.23 | 1 | |
| Probation/parole violation | 28,109 | 6,484 | 23.1 | 1,106 | 226 | 20.4 | 27,715 | 6,258 | 23.2 | 4.50 | 1 | |
| Other | 27,771 | 2,118 | 7.6 | 1,103 | 122 | 11.1 | 26,668 | 1,996 | 7.5 | 19.23** | 1 | |
| Length of current incarceration (M±SE months) | 29,322 | 49.45±67.61 | 1,164 | 24.27±25.32 | 28,158 | 50.49±68.60 | 30.95** | 1,968 | ||||
| Use of substances at time of offense | 17,204 | 742 | 16,462 | |||||||||
| None | 8,601 | 50.0 | 368 | 49.6 | 8,233 | 50.0 | ||||||
| Alcohol | 3,626 | 21.1 | 192 | 25.9 | 3,434 | 20.9 | 15.76* | 3 | ||||
| Drugs | 2,535 | 14.7 | 103 | 13.9 | 2,432 | 14.8 | ||||||
| Alcohol and drugs | 2,442 | 14.2 | 79 | 10.7 | 2,363 | 14.4 | ||||||
| Age at first arrest (M±SD) | 30,949 | 26.52±11.63 | 1,201 | 23.70±7.41 | 29,748 | 26.63±11.76 | 13.06** | 1,456 | ||||
| Lifetime arrests | 30,951 | 8.17±11.76 | 1,201 | 4.16±6.76 | 29,750 | 8.33±11.89 | 20.19** | 1,518 | ||||
| Length of current homelessness | 30,746 | 1,195 | 29,551 | |||||||||
| Not homeless | 24,896 | 81.0 | 1,028 | 86.0 | 23,868 | 80.8 | ||||||
| <6 months | 2,226 | 7.2 | 79 | 6.6 | 2,147 | 7.3 | 29.35* | 3 | ||||
| <2 years | 1,779 | 5.8 | 55 | 4.6 | 1,724 | 5.8 | ||||||
| ≥2 years | 1,845 | 6.0 | 33 | 2.8 | 1,812 | 6.1 | ||||||
| Episodes of homelessness | 30,945 | |||||||||||
| 0 | 22,279 | 72.0 | 1,201 | 938 | 78.1 | 29,744 | 21,341 | 71.8 | 26.70** | 3 | ||
| 1 or 2 | 6,584 | 21.3 | 213 | 17.7 | 6,371 | 21.4 | ||||||
| 3 or 4 | 1,229 | 4.0 | 33 | 2.8 | 1,196 | 4.0 | ||||||
| ≥5 | 853 | 2.8 | 17 | 1.4 | 836 | 2.8 | ||||||
| Currently homeless or any homeless history | 30,948 | 9,201 | 30.0 | 1,201 | 280 | 23.3 | 29,767 | 8,921 | 29.7 | 24.63** | 1 | |
| Any serious medical problem | 30,226 | 18,050 | 59.7 | 1,181 | 633 | 53.6 | 29,045 | 17,417 | 60.0 | 19.12** | 1 | |
| Psychiatric diagnosis | ||||||||||||
| Alcohol abuse or dependence | 30,840 | 13,848 | 44.9 | 1,196 | 516 | 43.1 | 29,644 | 13,332 | 45.0 | 1.56 | 1 | |
| Drug abuse or dependence | 30,867 | 13,791 | 44.7 | 1,193 | 438 | 36.7 | 29,674 | 13,353 | 45.0 | 31.85** | 1 | |
| Psychotic disorder | 30,968 | 2,093 | 6.8 | 1,201 | 85 | 7.1 | 29,767 | 2,008 | 6.8 | .20 | 1 | |
| Mood disorder | 30,818 | 8,559 | 27.8 | 1,194 | 393 | 32.9 | 29,624 | 8,166 | 27.6 | 16.37** | 1 | |
| Personality disorder | 30,796 | 3,459 | 11.2 | 1,190 | 144 | 12.1 | 29,606 | 3,315 | 11.2 | .94 | 1 | |
| Combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder | 30,804 | 1,895 | 6.2 | 1,195 | 452 | 37.8 | 29,609 | 1,443 | 4.9 | 2160.17** | 1 | |
| Adjustment disorder | 30,804 | 6,263 | 20.3 | 1,195 | 285 | 23.9 | 29,649 | 5,978 | 20.2 | 9.65* | 1 | |
| Other psychiatric disorder | 30,757 | 3,324 | 10.81 | 1,190 | 190 | 16.0 | 29,567 | 3,134 | 10.6 | 34.18** | 1 | |
| Use of any Veterans Affairs (VA) services in the past 6 months | 30,686 | 1,791 | 5.8 | 1,189 | 125 | 10.5 | 29,497 | 1,666 | 5.7 | 49.22** | 1 | |
| Willingness to use VA services | ||||||||||||
| Mental health | 28,606 | 16,845 | 58.9 | 1,132 | 738 | 65.2 | 27,474 | 16,107 | 58.6 | 19.37** | 1 | |
| Medical care | 28,733 | 23,476 | 81.7 | 1,134 | 935 | 82.5 | 27,599 | 22,541 | 81.7 | .44 | 1 | |
| Residential treatment | 28,244 | 10,390 | 36.8 | 1,108 | 345 | 31.1 | 27,136 | 10,045 | 37.0 | 15.83** | 1 | |
| Social-vocational assistance | 28,284 | 10,627 | 37.6 | 1,111 | 426 | 38.3 | 27,173 | 10,201 | 37.5 | .29 | 1 | |
| Case management | 28,391 | 11,855 | 41.8 | 1,116 | 465 | 41.7 | 27,275 | 11,390 | 41.8 | .00 | 1 | |
a
Data were collected between October 2007 and April 2011 by the Health Care for Reentry Veterans (HCRV) program.
*p<.01 **p<.001
Most veterans reported serious medical problems and had an alcohol or drug abuse or dependence diagnosis, but most were not currently homeless and reported no recent homelessness history. Most veterans had not used the VA in the past six months but reported being willing to use VA mental health and medical services.
Bivariate analyses revealed that compared with other veterans, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were significantly younger and were more likely to be white, be married, and have some income in the past month. OEF/OIF/OND veterans were expected to be incarcerated for a shorter duration of time, were more likely to have been using only alcohol (as opposed to alcohol and drugs) at the time of the offense, and were less likely to be homeless or have a history of recent homelessness. OEF/OIF veterans were less likely to have serious medical problems and to report drug abuse or dependence but were more likely to have a mood disorder, an adjustment disorder, and other mental health problems. Most notably, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were dramatically more likely to report combat exposure and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Compared with other veterans, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were also more likely to have used the VA in the past six months and were more willing to use VA mental health services but were less willing to use VA residential treatment.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses (Table 3) showed that among HCRV clients, younger age, being married, reporting combat exposure, having a shorter duration of incarceration, being first arrested at an older age, having combat-related PTSD, and not having a drug abuse or dependence diagnosis were all independently associated with OEF/OIF/OND service, with the largest effect sizes for combat exposure and combat-related PTSD.
| Characteristic | β | SE | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | –.20** | .01 | .82 | .81–.83 |
| Race-ethnicity (reference: white) | ||||
| Black | –.16 | .10 | .85 | .70–1.05 |
| Hispanic | .20 | .16 | 1.22 | .90–1.65 |
| Other | .43 | .24 | 1.53 | .96–2.44 |
| Marital status (reference: married) | ||||
| Widowed, separated, or divorced | –.30 | .12 | .74 | .58–.94 |
| Never married | –.50** | .13 | .61 | .47–.78 |
| Combat exposure | 2.89** | .10 | 18.07 | 14.78–22.10 |
| Current offenseb | .34 | .15 | 1.41 | 1.05–1.88 |
| Duration of current incarceration | –.00* | .00 | 1.00 | .99–1.00 |
| Age at first arrest | .03** | .01 | 1.03 | 1.02–1.05 |
| Lifetime arrests | –.02 | .01 | .98 | .97–1.00 |
| Drug abuse or dependence (reference: no drug abuse or dependence) | –.31* | .10 | .74 | .61–.89 |
| Combat-related PTSDc (reference: no PTSD) | 1.14** | .12 | 3.12 | 2.46–3.95 |
| Use of any Veterans Affairs services in the past 6 months (reference: no use) | .46 | .18 | 1.58 | 1.12–2.25 |
a
Results are from backward stepwise logistic regression. HCRV, Health Care for Reentry Veterans
b
Offense other than violent offense, property offense, drug offense, public order offense, and probation or parole violation
c
PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder
*p<.01 **p<.001
Discussion
National administrative data from the HCRV program revealed that OEF/OIF/OND veterans represented a small minority (3.9%) of the veteran population incarcerated in state and federal prisons. Moreover, even among the youngest age group (aged 20–29 years) and within different ethnic groups, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were less than half as likely to be incarcerated as other veterans, suggesting this finding is not simply an artifact of age or race. This finding may reflect the increased attention and service supports provided to OEF/OIF/OND veterans by the VA (11,12) and other organizations (13,14) and is consistent with reports that the proportion of prisoners who are veterans has declined steadily over the past three decades (5). It is also in accord with studies showing less risk of homelessness (15) and substance abuse (16) among OEF/OIF/OND veterans than among veterans of earlier service eras.
Of incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans, a majority were unmarried white men in their early thirties who were not homeless, were not working, and had no income. Multivariate analyses showed that compared with other veterans, OEF/OIF/OND veterans were younger, were more likely to be married, and expected to have shorter incarceration periods. The most common current incarceration offense was a violent offense, reported by 38% of OEF/OIF/OND veterans and 35% of other veterans; these proportions are consistent with, although slightly lower than, the proportions contained in a previous report (5). After the data were controlled for age, OEF/OIF/OND veterans still had a shorter incarceration period and reported being arrested fewer times in their lifetime than other veterans.
Alcohol abuse or dependence was most common diagnosis for both OEF/OIF/OND veterans (43%) and other veterans (45%). Psychotic disorder was the least common diagnosis among OEF/OIF/OND veterans (7%), and combat-related PTSD was the least common diagnosis among other veterans (5%). Most incarcerated veterans had some mental health or substance abuse problems, which is consistent with previous studies (14,17). The high rates of substance use disorders among all incarcerated veterans suggest that the HCRV program should aggressively seek to address substance abuse problems. It is likely that many offenses leading to incarceration were either directly or indirectly related to substance abuse, as evidenced by the sizable proportion of veterans who endorsed using substances at the time of their offense and the number of veterans who were currently incarcerated for drug offenses.
Incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans were less likely than other veterans to have a drug abuse or dependence diagnosis, which may be due to notable decreases over the past 28 years in the use of illegal drugs and cigarettes among military personnel, likely reflecting the military’s implementation in the1980s of a zero tolerance policy for drug abuse (18).
Perhaps the most salient clinical finding was that incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans were three times more likely than other incarcerated veterans to have combat-related PTSD, probably reflecting their greater likelihood of combat exposure. This finding may have important clinical implications, given that PTSD has been associated with a host of negative health, psychosocial, and functional problems among OEF/OIF/OND veterans (19–21). Incarcerated adults often do not receive needed mental health treatment (22,23), and provision of these services after their release may be particularly important to prevent recidivism, homelessness, and other negative outcomes (24,25). Thus, programs like HCRV can hope to be instrumental in helping incarcerated veterans connect to needed mental health services upon their release and successfully integrate into the community.
Previous efforts to link incarcerated veterans to VA health care services have been challenging, but specialized outreach services have shown promise (26). Further research is needed to evaluate the success of prerelease outreach efforts in linking veterans to needed health and mental health services after discharge and to both preventing criminal justice system recidivism and homelessness and improving health.
Several limitations of this study deserve mention. Although the HCRV program did not formally target particular groups of veterans for outreach, the representativeness of the national sample in this study of the population of incarcerated veterans is undetermined. The HCRV program was directed at veterans soon to be discharged, so the sample may underrepresent younger veterans with longer sentences, although this possibility could not be empirically evaluated. However, one might expect that the VA’s focus on OEF/OIF/OND veterans and the extensive media attention paid to this group of veterans may lead to an oversampling of this group. Yet, this expectation only strengthens the credibility of the finding that incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans are less likely to be incarcerated than other veterans.
Causal directionality of the associations between OEF/OIF/OND status and other characteristics is unknown, and causal risk factors cannot be conclusively determined from these data. The diagnoses of mental disorders, including PTSD, were not assessed with structured, standardized measures and relied on veteran self-report and the clinical skills and judgment of HCRV specialists. Moreover, PTSD from noncombat-related events was not assessed, which may be an area worthy of future study.
Data about whether veterans in the sample had filed VA disability claims were not available. However, given that combat-related PTSD is the most common VA psychiatric disability claim filed among veterans (27,28), it would have been useful to examine how pending disability claims or intent to apply for disability influenced the clinical presentation of incarcerated veterans (29) and the study results, especially because older veterans may be more likely than younger veterans to have had their disability claims settled.
Conclusions
HCRV data suggested that OEF/OIF/OND veterans are at lower risk of incarceration than veterans of other service eras. However, incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans reported higher rates of combat exposure and PTSD than other incarcerated veterans, suggesting that some incarcerated OEF/OIF/OND veterans may especially benefit from PTSD treatment and VA services upon their release.
Acknowledgments and disclosures
The authors report no competing interests.
References
1.
Fontana A, Rosenheck RA: The role of war-zone trauma and PTSD in the etiology of antisocial behavior. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 193:203–209, 2005
2.
Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA, Desai RA: Risk of incarceration among male veterans and nonveterans: are veterans of the all volunteer force at greater risk? Armed Forces and Society 33:337–350, 2007
3.
Schwartz J: Defendants fresh from war find service counts in court. New York Times, March 16, 2010, p A14
4.
Sontag D, Alvarez L: Across America, deadly echoes of foreign battles. New York Times, Jan 13, 2008, p A1
5.
Noonan ME, Mumola CJ: Veterans in State and Federal Prison, 2004. Washington, DC US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 2007
6.
McGuire J: Closing a front door to homelessness among veterans. Journal of Primary Prevention 28:389–400, 2007
7.
McGuire JF, Rosenheck RA: Criminal history as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of homeless people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services 55:42–48, 2004
8.
Metraux S, Culhane DP: Homeless shelter use and reincarceration following prison release. Criminology and Public Policy 3:139–160, 2004
9.
National Survey of Veterans, Active Duty Service Members, Demobilized National Guard and Reserve Members, Family Members, and Surviving Spouses. Rockville, Md, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 2010
10.
SPSS 17.0. Chicago, SPSS, Inc, 2008
11.
Seal KH, Bertenthal D, Maguen S, et al.: Getting beyond “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”: an evaluation of US Veterans Administration postdeployment mental health screening of veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. American Journal of Public Health 98:714–720, 2008
12.
Kang HK, Bullman TA: Risk of suicide among US veterans after returning from the Iraq or Afghanistan war zones. JAMA 300:652–653, 2008
13.
Burnam MA, Meredith LS, Tanielian T, et al.: Mental health care for Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. Medical Care 28:771–782, 2009
14.
Summerlot J, Green S, Parker D: Student veterans organizations. New Directions for Student Services Summer (126):71–79, 2009
15.
Edens EL, Kasprow W, Tsai J, et al.: Association of substance use and VA service-connected disability benefits with risk of homelessness among veterans. American Journal on Addictions 20:412–419, 2011
16.
Fontana A, Rosenheck RA: Treatment-seeking veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan: comparison with veterans of previous wars. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 196:513–521, 2008
17.
Saxon AJ, Davis TM, Sloan KL, et al.: Trauma, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and associated problems among incarcerated veterans. Psychiatric Services 52:959–964, 2001
18.
Bray RM, Pemberton MR, Hourani LL: Department of Defense Surveys of Health Related Behaviors Among Active Duty Military Personnel. Washington, DC, US Department of Defense, 2009
19.
Tsai J, Harpaz-Rotem I, Pietrzak RH, et al.: The role of coping, resilience, and social support in mediating the relation between PTSD and social functioning in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Psychiatry 75:135–149, 2012
20.
Hoge CW, Terhakopian A, Castro CA, et al.: Association of posttraumatic stress disorder with somatic symptoms, health care visits, and absenteeism among Iraq war veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry 164:150–153, 2007
21.
Jakupcak M, Conybeare D, Phelps L, et al.: Anger, hostility, and aggression among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans reporting PTSD and subthreshold PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress 20:945–954, 2007
22.
Wilper AP, Woolhandler S, Boyd JW, et al.: The health and health care of US prisoners: results of a nationwide survey. American Journal of Public Health 99:666–672, 2009
23.
Rich JD, Wakeman SE, Dickman SL: Medicine and the epidemic of incarceration in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 364:2081–2083, 2011
24.
Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA: Jail incarceration, homelessness, and mental health: a national study. Psychiatric Services 59:170–177, 2008
25.
Nelson M, Deess P, Allen C: The First Month Out: Postincarceration Experiences in New York City. New York, Vera Institute of Justice, 1999. Available at www.vera.org/download?file=219/first_month_out.pdf
26.
McGuire J, Rosenheck RA, Kasprow WJ: Health status, service use, and costs among veterans receiving outreach services in jail or community settings. Psychiatric Services 54:201–207, 2003
27.
Frueh BC, Grubaugh AL, Elhai JD, et al.: US Department of Veterans Affairs disability policies for posttraumatic stress disorder: administrative trends and implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and research. American Journal of Public Health 97:2143–2145, 2007
28.
Murdoch M, Sayer NA, Spoont MR, et al.: Long-term outcomes of disability benefits in US veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 68:1072–1080, 2011
29.
Frueh BC, Elhai JD, Gold PB, et al.: Disability compensation seeking among veterans evaluated for posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatric Services 54:84–91, 2003
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: Birdie and Joseph, by Larry Rivers, 1955. Oil on canvas; 13 × 25 inches. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Melvin Blake and Frank Purnell Collection (2003.44). Photograph © 2013, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
History
Published online: 1 January 2013
Published in print: January 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).