Racial-Ethnic Disparities in First-Episode Psychosis Treatment Outcomes From the RAISE-ETP Study
Abstract
Objective:
This study examined racial and ethnic differences in treatment outcomes among participants in a randomized controlled trial of an intervention for first-episode psychosis called NAVIGATE.
Methods:
Secondary data analyses were conducted for participants randomly assigned to usual community care (N=181) and NAVIGATE (N=223). Generalized estimating equations assessed whether race and ethnicity were associated with psychiatric symptoms and service use (medication management, family psychoeducation, and individual therapy) over a 24-month treatment period, accounting for baseline symptoms, duration of untreated psychosis, and insurance status.
Results:
Among persons in usual community care, non-Hispanic blacks scored significantly higher throughout treatment on measures of positive symptoms (β=2.15, p=.010), disorganized thoughts (β=1.15, p=.033), and uncontrolled hostility (β=.74, p=.027), compared with non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive individual therapy (OR=.45, p=.001). Families of Hispanic participants in usual community care were less likely than non-Hispanic white families to receive family psychoeducation (OR=.20, p=.01). For NAVIGATE participants, race and ethnicity were not associated with differences in psychiatric symptoms over time; families of non-Hispanic black participants were less likely than those of non-Hispanic white participants to receive family psychoeducation (OR=.53, p=.009). Hispanic participants in NAVIGATE were more likely than non-Hispanic white participants to receive medication management (OR=2.93, p=.001).
Conclusions:
In usual community care, non-Hispanic blacks scored higher on measures of psychiatric symptoms and were less likely to receive important services, compared with non-Hispanic whites. In NAVIGATE, racial and ethnic differences in psychiatric symptoms were not evident, although non-Hispanic blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive family psychoeducation.
Non-Hispanic blacks are five times more likely than non-Hispanic whites to be given a diagnosis of schizophrenia and are also at a higher risk of being misdiagnosed with schizophrenia (1–6). In addition, compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks and other racial and ethnic minority groups (for example, Hispanics) with psychotic disorders have higher rates of involuntary hospitalizations and interactions with law enforcement and are less likely to be enrolled in outpatient mental health services and adhere to treatment (7,8). Although the causes of these disparities are unclear, racial and ethnic minority groups are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have limited access to care, to lack insurance coverage, and to experience implicit bias (9,10). Individuals from minority groups are also more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have negative opinions about mental health care and mistrust of providers (10–12).
Each year, an estimated 115,000 individuals experience first-episode psychosis (FEP), and 70% of FEPs occur before age 25 (13,14). FEP is a critical point in the initiation of mental health care for individuals, and the support of their family members is essential in the prevention of poor short- and long-term outcomes (that is, lifelong disability) associated with schizophrenia (15). FEP interventions have been developed and tested throughout the world (16–18). Although these interventions differ in terms of their components, all include a combination of evidence-based interventions for psychosis, such as antipsychotic medications, case management, psychotherapy, vocational rehabilitation, and family psychoeducation. In the United States, the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode, Early Treatment Program (RAISE-ETP), a large multisite randomized controlled trial, investigated the efficacy of a coordinated specialty care intervention called NAVIGATE that incorporates shared decision making in family psychoeducation, individual therapy, medication management, and supported employment and education (19,20).
The RAISE-ETP (N=404) demonstrated that NAVIGATE participants had significantly higher quality of life and treatment retention, as well as less severe psychiatric symptoms, compared with persons with schizophrenia in treatment as usual (20). Previous secondary analyses of data from this trial found that at study entry, non-Hispanic blacks had higher levels of disorganized thoughts and lower functioning, compared with non-Hispanic whites (21). At treatment entry, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive first-generation antipsychotic medications (for example, haloperidol) rather than second-generation antipsychotics, and Hispanics were also more likely to be prescribed risperidone (22). These findings highlight further need to characterize and understand racial and ethnic differences among individuals with FEP.
Although these studies described racial and ethnic differences at study entry, no published research has described racial and ethnic differences in psychiatric symptoms, functioning, and use of evidenced-based interventions, such as family psychoeducation, individual therapy, and medication management, during the course of treatment. The primary purpose of this secondary data analysis was to examine racial and ethnic differences in psychiatric symptoms and service use among individuals in RAISE-ETP treatment conditions (usual community care and NAVIGATE) across a 24-month treatment period, accounting for baseline symptoms, duration of untreated psychosis, and insurance type.
Methods
Participants
This secondary data analysis used the RAISE-ETP data set obtained from the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive. The intent-to-treat sample included 404 individuals (usual community care, N=181; NAVIGATE, N=223) with diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, or psychotic or brief psychotic disorders assessed by using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-4 Disorders, Patient Edition (SCID) (23). Patients were recruited from community health agencies nationwide. Additional eligibility criteria included experiencing only one episode of psychosis and lifetime receipt of antipsychotic medications for six or fewer months. Exclusion criteria were a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, or substance-induced psychotic disorder; a current psychotic disorder caused by a medical condition; or a diagnosis of a neurological disorder, head injury, or other general medical condition that would impede treatment.
For the total sample, the mean±SD age was 23.61±5.06, and 72% (N=293) were male. Forty-three percent (N=173) were non-Hispanic white, 34% (N=139) were non-Hispanic black, 3% (N=12) were Asian, 5% (N=21) were Alaska Native/Native American, and <1% (N=1) identified as Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Eleven percent (N=45) identified as Hispanic white, 3% (N=13) identified as Hispanic black, 4% (N=15) identified as Hispanic other. Informed consent was obtained from participants over age 17, and informed assent and parental consent was provided for participants ages 15–17.
Study Intervention
NAVIGATE is a coordinated specialty care intervention comprising key services, such as medication management, family psychoeducation, and individual therapy (20). Usual community care (the control condition) was determined by clinicians and available services at the designated site (19). Participants completed a baseline assessment, followed by treatment provided across a 24-month study period. All assessments were performed by nonblinded research assistants or site-based personnel or blinded remote personnel with clinical experience to perform diagnostic interviews to evaluate symptoms and quality of life. Additional study details have been published elsewhere (19,24).
Measures
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and scores on five PANSS subscales (negative symptoms, positive symptoms, uncontrolled hostility, disorganized thoughts, and anxiety and depression) were collected at baseline and months 6, 12, 18, and 24 to measure psychiatric symptoms during the treatment period (25). The self-report Service User and Resource Form, collected at baseline and monthly during the 24-month treatment period, was used to assess the delivery of key services, such as medication management, family psychoeducation, and individual therapy (20,26,27). Medication management was assessed by asking participants, “Were you asked to record your symptoms and side effects with your psychiatrist or nurse practitioner?” This measure was dichotomized into yes or no; responses of “don’t know” and “not prescribed medication” were classified as no. To assess individual therapy, participants answered yes or no to the following question: “Have you had individual sessions with a mental health provider who helps you work on your goals and look positively toward the future?” Family psychoeducation was assessed by an answer of yes or no to the following question: “Has your family met with a mental health provider to help them understand and address your situation?”
Control variables.
Prior to treatment entry, the duration of untreated psychosis was defined as the time between the onset of symptoms and receipt of initial treatment, assessed in weeks. At baseline, participants were asked whether they possessed private insurance, public insurance, or were uninsured/did not know, and this variable was used in the analyses as a proxy for socioeconomic status. Baseline PANSS subscale scores were used in each analysis.
Race and ethnicity.
Race was self-reported and categorized as white, black, and other (that is, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Native American). Ethnicity was self-reported and dichotomized as either Hispanic or Latino (that is, Hispanic white, Hispanic black, or Hispanic other,) and non-Hispanic or non-Latino. Race and ethnicity were merged and characterized as non-Hispanic white (N=173), non-Hispanic black (N=139), Hispanic (N=73), and other (N=19).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive analyses were conducted for the intent-to-treat sample (N=404). Two separate generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used—the first among those who received usual community care and the second among those who received NAVIGATE—to examine racial and ethnic differences (non-Hispanic whites [reference group], non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and others) on the PANSS total score and subscale scores and use of medication management, individual therapy, and family psychoeducation services across the 24-month treatment period, controlling for duration of untreated psychosis, insurance type, and—for PANSS scores—the corresponding baseline PANSS subscale score. All analyses were replicated without the control variables to represent unadjusted analyses. [Tables and figures in an online supplement to this article report results of unadjusted analyses.] In both analyses, GEE used all available pairs to account for possible missing data. All analyses were conducted with SPSS 24.0, and statistical significance was set at p<.05. For continuous outcomes, unstandardized regression coefficients, means and standard deviations are presented, and odds ratios (ORs) are presented for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Data on participant characteristics at baseline by treatment condition are presented in Table 1.
| Usual community care (N=181) | NAVIGATE (N=223) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hispanic white (N=71) | Non- Hispanic black (N=85) | Hispanic (N=18) | Other (N=7) | Non- Hispanic white (N=102) | Non- Hispanic black (N=54) | Hispanic (N=55) | Other (N=12) | |||||||||
| Characteristic | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % |
| Males | 48 | 68 | 55 | 65 | 13 | 72 | 4 | 57 | 81 | 79 | 37 | 69 | 46 | 84 | 9 | 75 |
| Insurance | ||||||||||||||||
| Private | 19 | 27 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 33 | 3 | 43 | 31 | 31 | 10 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 6 | 50 |
| Public | 22 | 31 | 37 | 44 | 0 | — | 1 | 14 | 29 | 28 | 15 | 28 | 15 | 27 | 2 | 17 |
| Uninsured | 30 | 42 | 43 | 51 | 12 | 67 | 3 | 43 | 42 | 41 | 26 | 48 | 32 | 58 | 4 | 33 |
| Missing | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0 | — | 0 | — | 3 | 6 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Age (M±SD years) | 23.24±4.67 | 24.23±5.13 | 21.95±3.18 | 22.57±6.36 | 24.71±5.73 | 23.68±4.92 | 21.94±4.34 | 22.72±4.15 | ||||||||
| Duration of untreated psychosis (M±SD weeks) | 187.66±227.88 | 244.79±325.51 | 154.61±210.44 | 197.00±251.33 | 171.82±249.50 | 209.42±282.44 | 165.51±214.34 | 165.92±250.47 | ||||||||
| PANSS (M±SD score)a | ||||||||||||||||
| Totalb | 71.83±14.29 | 76.56±15.56 | 75.22±13.71 | 74.47±15.03 | 76.07±15.68 | 79.40±13.75 | 80.04±15.13 | 84.75±10.07 | ||||||||
| Negative symptomsc | 18.08±5.53 | 19.93±5.30 | 19.61±6.13 | 17.71±5.12 | 19.15±6.06 | 19.38±5.60 | 21.47±5.82 | 21.50±5.20 | ||||||||
| Positive symptomsd | 23.38±6.16 | 23.99±5.83 | 22.89±3.98 | 26.86±7.06 | 24.02±6.43 | 25.04±5.10 | 24.00±6.75 | 26.00±5.05 | ||||||||
| Disorganized thoughtse | 14.62±4.05 | 16.00±5.04 | 16.17±4.48 | 15.43±2.23 | 15.58±5.11 | 17.40±5.09 | 18.09±4.62 | 17.42±2.94 | ||||||||
| Uncontrolled hostilityf | 6.34±2.29 | 6.53±2.34 | 6.06±2.44 | 5.86±1.46 | 7.06±3.42 | 7.08±2.67 | 6.93±2.83 | 7.33±2.77 | ||||||||
| Anxiety-depressiong | 9.41±3.87 | 10.12±4.21 | 10.50±4.26 | 9.86±4.38 | 10.26±3.66 | 10.51±4.30 | 9.55±3.96 | 12.50±3.80 | ||||||||
a
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
b
Possible scores range from 30 to 120.
c
Possible scores range from 6 to 42.
d
Possible scores range from 8 to 52.
e
Possible scores range from 7 to 49.
f
Possible scores range from 4 to 28.
g
Possible scores range from 4 to 28.
Among participants who received usual community care, non-Hispanic blacks had significantly higher scores on the positive symptoms (for example, hallucinations and delusion) subscale of the PANSS (β=2.15, p=.010), the disorganized thoughts subscale (β=1.15, p=.033), and the uncontrolled hostility subscale (β=.74, p=.027), compared with non-Hispanic whites (Table 2). Non-Hispanic black participants also had significantly lower scores than non-Hispanic white participants on the anxiety and depression symptoms subscale (β=–1.09, p=.042). For all PANSS scales, participants categorized as other had significantly higher scores on the positive symptoms subscale (β=4.56, p=.002), compared with non-Hispanic white participants. In the usual care condition, no significant differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white participants were found on any of the PANSS scales. Among NAVIGATE participants, no differences were found between non-Hispanic white participants and racial and ethnic minority groups on the PANSS total or subscale scores.
| Usual community care | Baseline covariate | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | ||||||||||||
| Non-Hispanic black | Hispanic | Other | DUPb | Insurance | PANSS | |||||||
| Characteristic | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | p | p | p |
| PANSS score | ||||||||||||
| Total | ns | ns | ns | .013 | ns | .001 | ||||||
| Negative symptoms | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | .001 | ||||||
| Positive symptoms | 2.15 | .51 to 3.80 | .010 | ns | 4.56 | 1.67 to 7.45 | .002 | .003 | ns | .001 | ||
| Disorganized thoughts | 1.15 | .09 to 2.20 | .033 | ns | ns | ns | ns | .001 | ||||
| Uncontrolled hostility | .74 | .08 to 1.40 | .027 | ns | ns | ns | ns | .004 | ||||
| Anxiety-depression | –1.09 | –2.13 to –.04 | .042 | ns | ns | .013 | .015 | .001 | ||||
| Service use | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | p | p | p |
| Medication management | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | — | ||||||
| Individual therapy | .45 | .45 to .28 | .001 | ns | ns | ns | ns | — | ||||
| Family psychoeducation | ns | .20 | .06 to .75 | .017 | ns | ns | ns | — | ||||
| NAVIGATE | ||||||||||||
| Non-Hispanic black | Hispanic | Other | DUP | Insurance | PANSS | |||||||
| PANSS score | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | β | 95% CI | p | p | p | p |
| Total | ns | ns | ns | .001 | .001 | .001 | ||||||
| Negative symptoms | ns | ns | ns | .002 | .011 | .001 | ||||||
| Positive symptoms | ns | ns | ns | .008 | .013 | .001 | ||||||
| Disorganized thoughts | ns | ns | ns | ns | .001 | .001 | ||||||
| Uncontrolled hostility | ns | ns | ns | .007 | .009 | .001 | ||||||
| Anxiety-depression | ns | ns | ns | .003 | .048 | .001 | ||||||
| Service use | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | p | p | p |
| Medication management | ns | 2.93 | 1.72 to 5.01 | .001 | ns | ns | ns | — | ||||
| Individual therapy | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | — | ||||||
| Family psychoeducation | .53 | .32 to .85 | .009 | ns | ns | .045 | .003 | — | ||||
a
Non-Hispanic white is the reference group for all comparisons. PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale
b
Duration of untreated psychosis
Table 3 presents the mean PANSS scores for usual community care and NAVIGATE treatment conditions by race and ethnicity across the 24-month treatment period. The findings were similar to those in the unadjusted model, which did not include baseline control variables (that is, duration of untreated psychosis, insurance type, and baseline PANSS scores) [see online supplement for results of unadjusted analyses].
| PANSS | Usual community care | NAVIGATE | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hispanic white | Non-Hispanic black | Hispanic | Other | Non-Hispanic white | Non-Hispanic black | Hispanic | Other | |||||||||
| subscale | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD |
| Total scoreb | 64.78 | 1.93 | 65.72 | 1.63 | 64.36 | 1.77 | 70.38 | 3.69 | 66.07 | 1.28 | 68.62 | 1.51 | 64.71 | 3.25 | 72.56 | 4.76 |
| Negative symptomsc | 17.70 | .45 | 17.35 | .55 | 16.65 | 1.48 | 16.98 | 2.00 | 17.13 | .44 | 17.45 | .66 | 16.95 | .74 | 18.23 | 1.10 |
| Positive symptomsd | 19.84 | .58 | 21.99* | .58 | 19.19 | 1.23 | 24.40** | 1.36 | 19.80 | .54 | 20.02 | .68 | 19.17 | .68 | 21.40 | 1.40 |
| Disorganized thoughtse | 13.41 | .33 | 14.55* | .48 | 13.71 | .91 | 14.92 | 1.69 | 13.88 | .30 | 13.87 | .43 | 14.52 | .42 | 14.63 | 1.07 |
| Uncontrolled hostilityf | 5.92 | .20 | 6.67* | .28 | 5.94 | .52 | 5.26 | .34 | 6.01 | .18 | 5.99 | .29 | 6.17 | .28 | 6.37 | .40 |
| Anxiety-depressiong | 9.14 | .39 | 8.06* | .40 | 9.18 | .54 | 10.44 | 1.00 | 7.81 | .28 | 8.64 | .42 | 7.45 | .46 | 10.11 | .79 |
a
PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Duration of untreated psychosis, insurance type, and baseline PANSS score were covariates.
b
Possible scores range from 30 to 120.
c
Possible scores range from 6 to 42.
d
Possible scores range from 8 to 52.
e
Possible scores range from 7 to 49.
f
Possible scores range from 4 to 28.
g
Possible scores range from 4 to 28.
*
p<.05, **p<.01, for comparison with non-Hispanic whites (reference)
Figure 1 shows the percentages of individuals by treatment condition who received key services. Among those in usual community care, non-Hispanic blacks were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive individual therapy (OR=.45, CI=.45–.28, p=.001), and Hispanic participants and their family members were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic white participants and their families to receive family psychoeducation (OR=.20, CI=.06–.75, p=.01).
FIGURE 1. Percentage of participants engaging in key services over the 24-month treatment period, by race and ethnicity and treatment conditiona
aDuration of untreated psychosis and insurance type were covariates. Whites are the reference group.
*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001
Among NAVIGATE participants, non-Hispanic blacks and their family members were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive family psychoeducation (OR=.53, CI=.32–.85, p=.009), and Hispanic participants were significantly more likely than non-Hispanic white participants to receive medication management (OR=2.93, CI=1.72–5.01, p=.001). There were no significant differences in service utilization between participants in the category of other ethnic-racial group and non-Hispanic white participants and no racial or ethnic differences at all in utilization of individual therapy.
Discussion
Among participants who received usual community care, non-Hispanic black participants experiencing FEP had significantly higher scores than non-Hispanic whites throughout the 24-month treatment period on subscales measuring positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and uncontrolled hostility. During treatment, participants in the category of other also had significantly higher scores on the positive symptoms subscale, compared with non-Hispanic whites. In the NAVIGATE treatment condition, no differences between racial and ethnic groups in psychiatric symptoms were noted during the treatment period. Furthermore, previous studies have suggested that the combination of components found in NAVIGATE, such as multidisciplinary teams, shared decision making, individual and family therapy, skill-based training, and modular-based treatment plans, reduces disparities that affect minority populations (28). Although the covariates were not the focus of this study, duration of untreated psychosis was significantly associated with PANSS scores throughout the 24-month treatment period in the NAVIGATE treatment condition, which is consistent with the findings of Kane and colleagues (20). Differences in psychiatric symptoms might not have been present in the NAVIGATE treatment condition because providers were required to implement fidelity measures, thereby standardizing treatment and ensuring consistency of treatment delivery.
The findings of our study build on previous research suggesting that non-Hispanic black patients with FEP begin treatment with more severe symptoms and a level of impairment that may limit the treatment benefit for racial and ethnic minority populations (21). This disparity among non-Hispanic black participants, along with our findings regarding positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and uncontrolled hostility throughout treatment, may be influenced by various other factors, such as lack of culturally tailored treatment delivery plans and materials, limited engagement and use of mental health care, low health literacy, cultural mistrust leading to negative perceptions of the mental health care system, or misdiagnoses of symptoms (10–12,29,30). In contrast to our findings for the NAVIGATE treatment condition, non-Hispanic blacks and persons in the category of other in the usual care condition were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive evidence-based interventions, which likely contributed to racial-ethnic differences in psychiatric outcomes. This disparity could be the result of inconsistencies in quality of care and type of services received in the usual care condition. These differences also indicate the need for additional focus on addressing racial disparities in FEP treatment outcomes and the potential influence of cultural mistrust in the community mental health care setting.
Participation in NAVIGATE has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes and engagement in or receipt of key services (20,31). However, previous analyses of NAVIGATE data did not assess participation in key NAVIGATE services by racial-ethnic minority groups. In both the adjusted and unadjusted findings, this secondary data analysis revealed that among NAVIGATE participants, non-Hispanic blacks and those in the group categorized as other were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to engage in family psychoeducation during the 24-month treatment period. These findings suggest that family psychoeducation may not appeal, may not be consistently offered, or may not be appropriately tailored for non-Hispanic blacks and other racial and ethnic minority groups. Lower levels of family engagement are associated with poorer long-term outcomes (32–35). Although a considerable amount of literature has examined barriers to family engagement and family experiences among non-Hispanic blacks (36–42), less research has focused on understanding the benefits of culturally tailored family psychoeducation and enhancements to existing engagement strategies to address these barriers.
Although statistically significant racial and ethnic differences in psychiatric symptoms were found in the usual care condition, caution should be taken when attributing clinical significance to differences in PANSS scores throughout treatment. First, the generalizability of our findings among participants categorized as other should be considered when interpreting the differences on the positive symptoms subscale because of the small sample (N=19). Second, among non-Hispanic blacks in NAVIGATE, total PANSS scores improved by roughly 20% during treatment (adjusting for baseline scores, duration of untreated psychosis, and insurance type), which does not meet the clinically significant cutoff of 50% improvement (43). However, previous research has found that NAVIGATE led to clinically meaningful findings overall (20). Findings in this secondary data analysis indicated low rates (<50%) of service use in the usual care condition, and low rates of use of family psychoeducation in the NAVIAGTE condition. Although several findings were significant, it is also unclear whether the lower rates of service use over time in the usual care condition was a result of the services not being available or not being offered to participants or whether participants simply did not engage in services that were available.
For the entire sample, the attrition rate over the 24-month treatment period was approximately 50%, leading to a substantial amount of missing data. However, our choice of statistical analyses (GEE) accounted for any missing data over time by using all available pairs in the GEE analyses. It is also important to note that the attrition rate for the RAISE-ETP study is consistent with previous studies conducted among similar populations with serious mental illness (major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia spectrum disorders) (44,45). Another limitation, which may be addressed in subsequent research, was the lack of a direct measure of income or class; insurance type was the best proxy for income and class available in the deidentified NAVIGATE data set.
Conclusions
Despite these limitations, our secondary data analyses highlight the effectiveness of NAVIGATE, compared with usual community care, as a coordinated specialty care program for improving functioning and symptoms for individuals from racial-ethnic minority groups experiencing FEP. However, the findings also highlight racial-ethnic disparities in the NAVIGATE condition in participation in family psychoeducation, resulting in lower rates of family engagement among non-Hispanic blacks and individuals from other racial and ethnic minority groups. These findings raise the possibility that standardization and consistency of care may reduce racial and ethnic disparities. Findings also suggest that among non-Hispanic blacks and individuals from other racial-ethnic minority groups, improvements are needed for culturally sensitive engagement, additional support networks, and outreach strategies targeted at families in both coordinated specialty care programs and community care settings. Identification of barriers or challenges to treatment engagement that are specific to individuals and families experiencing FEP can inform the development of culturally tailored engagement plans that will increase participation in evidence-based family psychoeducation interventions.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery (grant 1265-62496). Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained and analyzed from the controlled access data sets distributed from the National Database for Clinical Trials (NDCT). NDCT is a collaborative informatics system created and supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to provide a national resource to support and accelerate discovery related to clinical trial research in mental health. Dataset identifier, 2249.
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Supplementary Material
File (appi.ps.201800067.ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 60.75 KB
References
1.
Barnes A: Race, schizophrenia, and admission to state psychiatric hospitals. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 31:241–252, 2004
2.
Schwartz RC, Blankenship DM: Racial disparities in psychotic disorder diagnosis: a review of empirical literature. World Journal of Psychiatry 4:133–140, 2014
3.
Bresnahan M, Begg MD, Brown A, et al: Race and risk of schizophrenia in a US birth cohort: another example of health disparity? International Journal of Epidemiology 36:751–758, 2007
4.
Neighbors HW, Trierweiler SJ, Munday C, et al: Psychiatric diagnosis of African Americans: diagnostic divergence in clinician-structured and semistructured interviewing conditions. Journal of the National Medical Association 91:601–612, 1999
5.
Neighbors HW, Trierweiler SJ, Ford BC, et al: Racial differences in DSM diagnosis using a semi-structured instrument: the importance of clinical judgment in the diagnosis of African Americans. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44:237–256, 2003
6.
Mukherjee S, Shukla S, Woodle J, et al: Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in bipolar patients: a multiethnic comparison. American Journal of Psychiatry 140:1571–1574, 1983
7.
Li H, Eack SM, Montrose DM, et al: Longitudinal treatment outcome of African American and Caucasian patients with first episode psychosis. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 4:266–271, 2011
8.
Coid JW, Kirkbride JB, Barker D, et al: Raised incidence rates of all psychoses among migrant groups: findings from the East London First Episode Psychosis study. Archives of General Psychiatry 65:1250–1258, 2008
9.
Kohn-Wood L, Hooper L: Cultural competency, culturally tailored care, and the primary care setting: possible solutions to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 36:173–188, 2014
10.
Whaley AL: Cultural mistrust and the clinical diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia in African American patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 23:93–100, 2001
11.
Alegría M, Canino G, Ríos R, et al: Inequalities in use of specialty mental health services among Latinos, African Americans, and non-Latino whites. Psychiatric Services 53:1547–1555, 2002
12.
Dixon L, Green-Paden L, Delahanty J, et al: Variables associated with disparities in treatment of patients with schizophrenia and comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Psychiatric Services 52:1216–1222, 2001
13.
Kirkbride JB, Errazuriz A, Croudace TJ, et al: Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England, 1950–2009: a systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 7:e31660, 2012
14.
Simon GE, Coleman KJ, Yarborough BJH, et al: First presentation with psychotic symptoms in a population-based sample. Psychiatric Services 68:456–461, 2017
15.
Lincoln CV, McGorry P: Who cares? Pathways to psychiatric care for young people experiencing a first episode of psychosis. Psychiatric Services 46:1166–1171, 1995
16.
Malla AK, Norman RM, Joober R: First-episode psychosis, early intervention, and outcome: what have we learned? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 50:881–891, 2005
17.
McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ, et al: Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry 59:921–928, 2002
18.
Dixon LB, Goldman HH, Bennett ME, et al: Implementing coordinated specialty care for early psychosis: the RAISE Connection Program. Psychiatric Services 66:691–698, 2015
19.
Kane JM, Schooler NR, Marcy P, et al: The RAISE Early Treatment Program for first-episode psychosis: background, rationale, and study design. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 76:240–246, 2015
20.
Kane JM, Robinson DG, Schooler NR, et al: Comprehensive versus usual community care for first-episode psychosis: 2-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE Early Treatment Program. American Journal of Psychiatry 173:362–372, 2016
21.
Nagendra A, Schooler NR, Kane JM, et al: Demographic, psychosocial, clinical, and neurocognitive baseline characteristics of Black Americans in the RAISE-ETP study. Schizophrenia Research 193:64–68, 2018
22.
Robinson DG, Schooler NR, John M, et al: Prescription practices in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: data from the national RAISE-ETP study. American Journal of Psychiatry 172:237–248, 2015
23.
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, et al: Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders. New York, Biometrics Research, 1994
24.
Mueser KT, Penn DL, Addington J, et al: The NAVIGATE program for first-episode psychosis: rationale, overview, and description of psychosocial components. Psychiatric Services 66:680–690, 2015
25.
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 13:261–276, 1987
26.
Rosenheck RA, Resnick SG, Morrissey JP: Closing service system gaps for homeless clients with a dual diagnosis: integrated teams and interagency cooperation. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 6:77–87, 2003
27.
Rosenheck RA, Leslie DL, Sindelar J, et al: Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in a randomized trial of treatment for chronic schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 163:2080–2089, 2006
28.
Chin MH, Clarke AR, Nocon RS, et al: A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27:992–1000, 2012
29.
Atdjian S, Vega WA: Disparities in mental health treatment in US racial and ethnic minority groups: implications for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Services 56:1600–1602, 2005
30.
Whaley AL: A two-stage method for the study of cultural bias in the diagnosis of schizophrenia in African Americans. Journal of Black Psychology 30:167–186, 2004
31.
Rosenheck R, Mueser KT, Sint K, et al: Supported employment and education in comprehensive, integrated care for first episode psychosis: effects on work, school, and disability income. Schizophrenia Research 182:120–128, 2017
32.
Hsiao CY, Lee CT, Lu HL, et al: Living with schizophrenia: health-related quality of life among primary family caregivers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 26:5151–5159, 2017
33.
Norman RM, Malla AK, Manchanda R, et al: Social support and three-year symptom and admission outcomes for first episode psychosis. Schizophrenia Research 80:227–234, 2005
34.
Stowkowy J, Addington D, Liu L, et al: Predictors of disengagement from treatment in an early psychosis program. Schizophrenia Research 136:7–12, 2012
35.
Revier CJ, Reininghaus U, Dutta R, et al: Ten-year outcomes of first-episode psychoses in the MRC ÆSOP-10 Study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 203:379–386, 2015
36.
Spoth R, Redmond C: Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. Journal of Primary Prevention 21:267–284, 2000
37.
Scheppers E, van Dongen E, Dekker J, et al: Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: a review. Family Practice 23:325–348, 2006
38.
Compton MT, Esterberg ML, Druss BG, et al: A descriptive study of pathways to care among hospitalized urban African American first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum patients. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 41:566–573, 2006
39.
Compton MT: Barriers to initial outpatient treatment engagement following first hospitalization for a first episode of nonaffective psychosis: a descriptive case series. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 11:62–69, 2005
40.
Compton MT, Goulding SM, Gordon TL, et al: Family-level predictors and correlates of the duration of untreated psychosis in African American first-episode patients. Schizophrenia Research 115:338–345, 2009
41.
Compton MT, Kaslow NJ, Walker EF: Observations on parent/family factors that may influence the duration of untreated psychosis among African American first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum patients. Schizophrenia Research 68:373–385, 2004
42.
Smith ME, Lindsey MA, Williams CD, et al: Race-related differences in the experiences of family members of persons with mental illness participating in the NAMI Family to Family Education Program. American Journal of Community Psychology 54:316–327, 2014
43.
Hermes ED, Sokoloff D, Stroup TS, et al: Minimum clinically important difference in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale with data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 73:526–532, 2012
44.
Petry NM, Peirce JM, Stitzer ML, et al: Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:1148–1156, 2005
45.
McDonell MG, Srebnik D, Angelo F, et al: Randomized controlled trial of contingency management for stimulant use in community mental health patients with serious mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 170:94–101, 2013
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: Untitled, by Willem de Kooning, 1944. Oil and charcoal on paper laid on board. © Art Resource, New York City.
History
Received: 8 February 2018
Revision received: 25 April 2018
Revision received: 11 June 2018
Accepted: 6 July 2018
Published online: 28 August 2018
Published in print: November 01, 2018
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
This article reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIMH or of the submitters of original data to NDCT.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).