Skip to main content
Full access
INFLUENTIAL PUBLICATIONS
Published Online: 1 August 2006

Schizophrenia Susceptibility Genes: Emergence of Positional Candidates and Future Directions

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a devastating psychiatric disorder that affects ~1% of the population worldwide. It is characterized by so-called ‘positive symptoms’–including delusions and hallucinations–‘negative symptoms’–including blunted emotions and social isolation–and cognitive deficits–including impairments in attention and working memory. Studies of the inheritance of schizophrenia have revealed that it is a multifactorial disease that is characterized by multiple genetic susceptibility elements, each contributing a modest degree of risk. Linkage studies have identified several potential schizophrenia susceptibility loci, and in recent years major progress has been made in the identification of positional candidate susceptibility genes from these loci. A central goal of future research will be to use this genetic knowledge to generate specific animal models, characterize genetic interactions, investigate the disease pathophysiology and assist drug-discovery efforts.

The genetic component of schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder that has a lifetime prevalence of ~1% in most of the populations studied (1). Similar to many common complex disorders, schizophrenia is a multifactorial disorder that is characterized by the contribution of multiple susceptibility genes that could act in conjunction with epigenetic processes and environmental factors (1). More than 20 genome-wide scans aiming to localize genes for this disorder have been reported. Two recent meta-analyses (2, 3) of the combined results of several genome-wide studies were performed to attempt to clarify inconsistencies among individual studies (meta-analytic approaches tend to amplify signals that are weak but consistent among studies and to attenuate signals that are strong but non-reproducible). One meta-analysis study confirmed 8p, 13q and 22q as valid linkage regions that probably contain one or more susceptibility genes. The second meta-analysis study (using a different statistical methodology) implicated 2p12–q22.1 (under stringent criteria), in addition to loci at 5q, 3p, 11q, 2q, 1q, 22q, 8p, 6p, 20p and 14q (under less-stringent thresholds). One interpretation of these findings is that approximately ten regions of the genome are likely to contain schizophrenia susceptibility genes, although this is almost certainly an underestimate because: (i) meta-analytic approaches tend to attenuate true strong signals that are population specific; and (ii) it is expected that many schizophrenia susceptibility genes are undetectable using linkage studies. The ultimate validation of the linkage results will be the identification of the susceptibility genes themselves. Indeed, in the past three years, the field of schizophrenia genetics has moved to the systematic positional cloning of susceptibility genes from chromosomal regions that were first identified by linkage approaches. These systematic efforts employ the genotyping of relatively large numbers of markers, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) assays in family-based or case–control samples, and have resulted in the identification of strong positional candidate genes.
In this article, we discuss the genetic data regarding these strong positional candidate genes that were identified through the systematic follow-up of linkage signals (in chronological order of publication of the reports), in addition to their possible biological functions. We also discuss the genetic data for three candidate genes that are located in the vicinity of linkage signals and are identified through multipronged candidate gene approaches, rather than systematic positional cloning approaches. Finally, we briefly comment on the statistical support for these findings and the future directions of genetic research in the context of advancing the understanding of how genetic factors contribute biologically to the disease process.
Owing to space limitations, other genes that could be good candidates (e.g. DRD3, CHRNA2, BDNF, GAD2 and AKT1) but do not conform to the criteria outlined in the previous paragraph are not discussed in this article. Furthermore, we cite a limited number of follow-up genetic studies for each genetic finding, prioritizing the ones that use relatively large family-based samples. Such samples are considered more reliable than case–control samples in which factors such as hidden population stratification can confound the interpretation of a positive or negative finding (4).

Genes identified through the systematic follow-up of linkage signals

The first report of a strong positional candidate schizophrenia gene that was identified by a systematic fine-mapping approach within a region implicated by linkage analysis was published in 2002 (5). Soon thereafter, three additional reports described three new susceptibility genes that were identified using similar approaches (68). More recently, additional genes have been reported based on the systematic SNP-based follow-up analysis of linkage peaks (914) (Table 1).

Proline dehydrogenase

The proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) gene is located on chromosome 22q11, which is a region implicated by some linkage studies (2, 3) and also frequently deleted in patients with schizophrenia (15). Several studies have established that the risk of schizophrenia for a patient with a 22q11 microdeletion is ~25–31 times the general population risk of 1% (16, 17) and that the rate of 22q11 microdeletions in schizophrenia, although relatively low, is ~12–80 times the estimated general population rate (15). This first unequivocal association between a well-defined genetic lesion and schizophrenia facilitated fine-mapping efforts at this locus. LD analysis in family samples (triads) that tested for preferential transmission of 72 SNPs and multi-SNP haplotypes from parents to affected (non-deleted) individuals identified the over-transmission of a gene variant located at the 30 end of the PRODH gene (5, 18). This finding was recently replicated in two independent family-based samples, including a large collection of 528 families from China (19) and 274 families of Ashkenazi Jewish origin (20), although one negative family study has also been reported (21). Moreover, 30-end variants of the gene were also identified as being a risk factor for the development of psychotic symptoms during adolescence in children with 22q11 microdeletions (22). Although the implicated variants are consistently located at the 3′ end of the gene, their functional consequences are still unknown. However, rare variants of the PRODH gene affecting highly conserved amino acids (generated through gene conversion from a nearby pseudogene) that are enriched to various degrees in samples of individuals with schizophrenia have been identified (5). This discovery gained additional support in an independent set of studies (23, 24), and functional analysis has linked several of these variants with marked reductions in enzymatic activity (25). PRODH encodes an enzyme that metabolizes l-proline—a putative neuromodulatory amino acid that could directly influence glutamate-mediated transmission, which is believed to have a crucial role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (26). In addition, Prodh-deficient mice show dysregulation of cortical dopamine turnover and transmission that is reminiscent of schizophrenia in humans (26).

Dystrobrevin-binding protein 1

The dystrobrevin-binding protein 1, or dysbindin, (DTNBP1) gene maps within a broad region on chromosome 6p where there is evidence of linkage to schizophrenia in Irish families (27). Genetic variants of this gene are associated with schizophrenia (6) in the same families. This finding has been replicated in several additional samples, including some family-based samples, but negative studies have also been reported and considerable putative allelic heterogeneity was evident among the positive studies (2832). Initial expression and functional studies provide some additional support for a role for DTNBP1 in schizophrenia. DTNBP1 is a member of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex (33) and the dystrophin protein complex (34). It has a widespread distribution in the brain, including expression in pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus and the dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC). Two recent studies provide evidence that DTNBP1 expression is decreased in schizophrenia in both the DLPFC and the excitatory pathways of the hippocampus (35, 36). A substantial fraction of DTNBP1 is presynaptically localized, and preliminary in vitro evidence suggests that knockdown of endogenous dysbindin protein results in the reduction of presynaptic protein expression and glutamate release, indicating that dysbindin might influence exocytotic glutamate release (37).

Neuregulin 1

Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) was identified as being a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia following a genome-wide linkage scan of 33 Icelandic families with schizophrenia that highlighted a locus on chromosome 8p (7). Fine-mapping of the 8p locus, together with haplotype association analysis of a large number of patients with schizophrenia and control individuals, narrowed the region of interest to the 5′ end of the NRG1 gene. A core haplotype at the 50 end of the gene comprising several markers within a 290-kb LD block showed highly significant association with schizophrenia (7). The functional consequences of this gene variant are still unknown. NRG1 association with schizophrenia has been observed in several additional samples, including some reliable family-based samples, although considerable allelic heterogeneity was evident in these studies (3841). Negative studies have also been reported (20, 42, 43). The NRG1 gene encodes a well-characterized protein that is involved in many neuronal functions, ranging from neuronal survival to myelination and synaptic plasticity (44).

G72

The G72 gene is located within a broad linkage peak that extends from 13q32 to q34, where there is evidence of linkage to both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (2, 45). Significant association with schizophrenia was observed for several SNPs and haplotypes at the G72 locus in a French–Canadian case–control sample, and the association for two SNPs was replicated in a Russian case–control cohort (8). Interestingly, a subsequent study provided evidence of an association between variants at the G72 locus and bipolar disorder (46). The association of G72 with schizophrenia has been observed in several additional samples with evidence of allelic heterogeneity, although negative studies have also been reported (4753). Expression and functional studies indicate a potential interaction between G72 and D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) that modulates the DAAO enzymatic activity and, thus, could indirectly affect glutamate-mediated signaling (8, 54). However, this interaction remains to be demonstrated in vivo.

Disrupted in schizophrenia 1

A balanced translocation involving chromosomes 1 and 11 (1q42.1;11q14.3) was strongly linked to psychopathology, including schizophrenia, depression and mania in a large Scottish family. The 1q breakpoint was cloned and was found to involve two genes: disrupted in schizophrenia (DISC)1 and DISC2 (the latter is a noncoding, presumably regulatory, RNA) (55). Although DISC1 was identified five years ago, it was a more recent large-scale linkage (56) and follow-up systematic LD analysis in families from Finland that identified DISC1 as being a positional candidate from the 1q42 locus (9). DISC1 association with schizophrenia has been observed in several additional samples with evidence of allelic heterogeneity, although negative studies have also been reported (20, 57, 58). Interestingly, a family afflicted with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder was recently shown to have segregated a rare frameshift variant of the gene (59). DISC1 is a complex gene, the involvement of which in development and synaptic plasticity is poorly understood. The protein it encodes is associated with numerous cytoskeletal proteins and could be involved in centrosomal and microtubule function, cell migration, neurite outgrowth, membrane trafficking of receptors, mitochondrial function and, possibly, phosphodiesterase function (60, 61).

C-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase

LD analysis, using 14 microsatellite markers and 15 SNPs from a subregion of a previously reported linkage locus at 1q22 (62), in large Canadian families with schizophrenia produced nominally significant evidence of LD between schizophrenia and a subset of markers that is located within the genomic extent of the C-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (CAPON) gene, making CAPON a prime positional candidate from the schizophrenia susceptibility locus on 1q22 (10). An abnormal expression pattern of this gene was observed in the brains of individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (63). Two replication studies, one positive and one negative, have been reported (64, 65). CAPON is involved in NMDA-receptor-coupled nitric oxide signaling (66).

ZDHHC8

The involvement of this gene in schizophrenia was identified in the same LD screen of the 22q11 locus that led to the discovery of the PRODH–schizophrenia association (5, 18). More recently, it was shown that one of the ZDHHC8 risk alleles (at SNP rs175174), located in intron 4, affects the ratio of an intron-4-containing unspliced form (encoding a putative truncated inactive form of the protein) to the fully spliced active form (11). The relatively subtle consequent change in the level of the active protein led to ~1.5-fold increase in disease risk in two tested family samples (11). Other variants of the gene (affecting distinct aspects of its complex splicing or its expression level) could modulate the disease risk in other samples. One positive family-based study and one negative family-based study have been reported (67, 68). The effect of the gene is predicted to be much stronger in individuals with 22q11 deletions and schizophrenia, in which a 50% (or ~65% when the non-deleted allele carries, for example, the risk SNP rs175174 variant) decrease in ZDHHC8 activity levels is predicted. ZDHHC8 encodes a transmembrane palmitoyl-transferase that modifies, among other targets, postsynaptic density protein of 95 kDa (PSD-95) and could have an important role in excitatory synaptic transmission (69).

Trace amine receptor 4

Trace amine receptor 4 (TAAR6) was identified in an LD study (12) of European-ancestry and African–American families with schizophrenia that previously showed evidence of linkage to 6q13–q26 (70). This LD study (12) focused on subregion q23.2, which contains several functional candidate genes for schizophrenia. A primary screen using 31 SNPs and a follow-up higher-density screen using 23 SNPs over a 21.6-kb region highlighted TAAR6 (12) as being a prime positional candidate gene from the schizophrenia susceptibility locus on 6q23.2. Two negative replication studies have been reported (71, 72). However, an independent study (73) implicated TAAR6 (which is a G-protein-coupled receptor that is widely expressed in the brain (12, 74)) in susceptibility to bipolar disorder.

Epsin 4

Chromosome 5q33 is a region that has shown evidence of linkage to schizophrenia in four independent linkage studies. Four adjacent markers (and associated haplotypes) at the 5′ end of the epsin 4 (EPN4) gene, which is located in this region, showed significant evidence of LD with schizophrenia in a fine-mapping study that used 450 unrelated English, Irish, Welsh and Scottish research subjects with schizophrenia and 450 ancestrally matched supernormal controls (13). The EPN4 gene encodes the clathrin-associated protein enthoprotin, which has a role in the transport and stability of neurotransmitter vesicles at the synapses and within neurons (75). No replication studies have been reported.

γ-Aminobutyric acid A receptor subunit gene cluster

An early genome-wide linkage scan in Portuguese families with schizophrenia identified a risk locus on chromosome 5q31–q35 (76) – a finding supported by subsequent meta-analysis. A two-stage candidate gene association approach focused on a group of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor subunit genes (GABRA1, GABRA6, GABRB2, GABRG2 and GABRP) within this linkage peak (14). In the first stage, associations were detected in a Portuguese patient sample with SNPs and haplotypes in GABRA1, GABRP and GABRA6. The GABRA1 and GABRP findings were replicated in the second stage in an independent German family-based sample (14). These genes are plausible candidates based on prior speculation about the involvement of the GABA system in schizophrenia (77, 78).

Candidate genes located in the vicinity of linkage signals identified through candidate gene approaches

The candidacy of the genes described in this section is based on convergent genetic and biological evidence. Although unproven, the recurrent observation of the clustering of candidate susceptibility genes might indicate that more than one gene could contribute to at least some of the linkage signals in psychiatric disorders.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase

The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene is located in the 22q11 locus between the PRODH and ZDHHC8 genes, and is a strong positional and functional candidate. COMT metabolizes released dopamine, and variation in COMT activity could have effects that are specific to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). This regionally selective effect of COMT might depend on the relatively low abundance and non-synaptic localization of the dopamine transporter in the PFC compared with the striatum (79). A high-activity form of the enzyme (Val158) was proposed to increase susceptibility to schizophrenia (79). Association studies using the clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia as phenotype are equivocal (8086), although this form of the gene modulated executive function in some studies, which is affected in individuals with schizophrenia (79, 87). More-recent studies in animal models, however, indicate that low activity of this enzyme could be a risk factor for schizophrenia and that COMT might function as part of the genome buffering capacity to counteract the effect of other primary mutations that affect dopamine turnover and signaling in the frontal cortex (26). This prediction is supported by the results of a longitudinal follow-up study of children with 22q11 microdeletions. This study showed that the low-activity form of the enzyme (Met158) is a risk factor for decline in prefrontal cortical volume and cognition, and the consequent development of psychotic symptoms, during adolescence in these children (22). Overall, the potential contribution of COMT to schizophrenia is likely to be complex. In addition, the gene seems to have a functionally complex allelic architecture, with some alleles (Val158Met) determining the stability of the protein (88) and others determining the level of expression (86, 89).

Regulator of G-protein signaling 4

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS)4 was initially identified as being the only transcript (out of 7800 sampled by Mirnics et al. (90)) that was consistently reduced in the DLPFC of individuals with schizophrenia. The gene maps to 1q21–22, 0.7 Mb from CAPON. Chowdari et al. (91) genotyped 13 SNPs across a 300-kb segment spanning the gene in several independent datasets and found weak evidence of association with schizophrenia in each of the samples, although not in an allele-consistent manner. In most cases, association was present for a haplotype block stretching from intron 1 to several kilobase pairs upstream of the transcription start site. Independent replications have been reported but negative studies also exist (20, 9294). Of the 19 human RGS transcripts, RGS4 shows the highest expression in the brain compared with all other tissues and is abundant in the cerebral cortex (95). RGS4 is a GTPase activator that desensitizes Gi/o and Gq and, thereby, negatively modulates G-protein-mediated signaling by dopamine, metabotropic glutamate and muscarinic receptors (96).

Calcineurin γ catalytic subunit

Forebrain-specific calcineurin-knockout mice were reported to have a spectrum of behavioral abnormalities related to altered behaviors observed in schizophrenia patients (97). Follow-up studies identified calcineurin γ catalytic subunit (PPP3CC) as a potential schizophrenia susceptibility gene (98) and led to the proposal that alterations in calcineurin signaling contribute to schizophrenia pathogenesis. In support of this proposal, the gene is downregulated in the hippocampus of individuals with schizophrenia (99). The genetic association was not replicated, however, in a sample of Ashkenazi Jewish nuclear families (20). PPP3CC is located at 8p21.3, 10 Mb from NRG1 but adjacent to previously described linkage signals (98). Calcineurin is a multifunctional calcium-dependent serine/threonine phosphatase that is centrally involved in many aspects of synaptic plasticity. It has particular roles in glutamate and dopamine signaling and their interactions, including the regulation of DARPP32, a molecular node of convergence between dopamine receptor 1 and NMDA receptor signaling pathways (97).

Statistical support and generalization of genetic findings

The statistical burden of proof is lower for genes identified through systematic follow-up of linkage signals compared with genes picked in an essentially random fashion, irrespective of their location relative to linkage signals (for details, see Ref. (100)). Nevertheless, support for at least some of the findings described (e.g. PRODH, DTNBP1, NRG1, G72, DISC1 and COMT) seems to be strong, based on a combination of criteria: the degree of statistical significance, the reproducibility of the associations in independent family samples, the identification of independent rare risk alleles and the consistent findings from animal model studies and endophenotype-based studies in humans.
However, it is too early to draw firm conclusions about the generalization of these findings among different samples and populations based on the published replication studies, primarily because of issues regarding the extent of coverage of the implicated loci, the structure of the samples used in replication studies and publication bias. One important issue of concern regards the structure of the tested replication samples. It is becoming increasingly clear that, when allele frequencies differ notably among subpopulations that are not represented equally among cases and controls (population stratification), unreliable results can be obtained (4). The possibility, therefore, that replication studies using case–control samples represent false positives (or negatives) must be considered seriously. This is a problem that is relevant to all common complex disorders but it is likely to be more pronounced in genetic studies of psychiatric disorders, which are confounded by a larger degree of phenotypic heterogeneity. In addition, several of the employed ‘replication’ samples have been used repeatedly in genetic association studies, making the issue of multiple-testing corrections extremely relevant. These are important considerations given some striking inconsistencies among the variant alleles and haplotypes implicated in replication studies for at least some of the genes. It should be noted, however, that such inconsistencies are sometimes observed even in more-reliable family-based samples and can be explained in some instances by the presence of distinct variations that affect different functional elements within the gene that have emerged independently on a more recent ancestral background.

Future directions of genetic research

Clearly, there are still several ‘orphan’ linkage loci that await the identification of positional candidate genes, a task that will be facilitated by the sequencing of the human genome. It is likely that additional genes will also be identified through the genome-wide association studies that are starting to be implemented. As more genes are identified, a goal of future research will be to understand the functional implications and interactions of the susceptibility genes and their variants in the context of schizophrenia. Genetic studies of endophenotypes (79) (provided they are designed to avoid all of the pitfalls described earlier that are associated with genetic studies of the clinical syndrome), in addition to biological data from animal model studies, promise to advance the understanding of the disease pathophysiology in the coming years.
The question of true biological interaction among susceptibility genes is also extremely important in the field of complex psychiatric genetics, and might ultimately be better answered primarily by using a combination of molecular-based and animal-model-based approaches, as suggested by recent studies (26,60). Understanding the interactions between individual susceptibility elements could eventually aid the specificity of diagnosis and lead to the design of custom therapies with fewer side-effects and more-positive long-term disease outcomes for patients with specific genetic predispositions (Figure 1).
Table 1. Schizophrenia positional candidate genes: chromosomal location and potential function
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the schizophrenia genetics research process and its potential application to drug discovery. In this scheme, the identification of susceptibility genes by SNP-based association studies, coupled with the generation and characterization of relevant mouse models and endophenotype studies in humans, forms a comprehensive system with which to identify the genes and molecular pathways involved in schizophrenia pathogenesis. This knowledge base provides a framework for mechanism-based drug-discovery efforts.

Footnote

(Reprinted with permission from Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol. 27 No.4 April 2006; 27(4):226–233 )

References

1.
Karayiorgou, M. and Gogos, J.A. (1997) A turning point in schizophrenia genetics. Neuron 19, 967–979
2.
Badner, J.A. and Gershon, E.S. (2002) Meta-analysis of whole-genome linkage scans of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 7, 405–411
3.
Lewis, C.M. et al. (2003) Genome scan meta-analysis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, part II: schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 34–48
4.
Campbell, C.D. et al. (2005) Demonstrating stratification in a European American population. Nat. Genet. 37, 868–872
5.
Liu, H. et al. (2002) Genetic variation at the 22q11 PRODH2/DGCR6 locus presents an unusual pattern and increases susceptibility to schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 3717–3722
6.
Straub, R.E. et al. (2002) Genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene DTNBP1, the human ortholog of the mouse dysbindin gene, is associated with schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 337–348
7.
Stefansson, H. et al. (2002) Neuregulin 1 and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 877–892
8.
Chumakov, I. et al. (2002) Genetic and physiological data implicating the new human gene G72 and the gene for d-amino acid oxidase in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 13675–13680
9.
Hennah, W. et al. (2003) Haplotype transmission analysis provides evidence of association for DISC1 to schizophrenia and suggests sex-dependent effects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 3151–3159
10.
Brzustowicz, L.M. et al. (2004) Linkage disequilibrium mapping of schizophrenia susceptibility to the CAPON region of chromosome 1q22. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 1057–1063
11.
Mukai, J. et al. (2004) Evidence that the gene encoding ZDHHC8 contributes to the risk of schizophrenia. Nat. Genet. 36, 725–731
12.
Duan, J. et al. (2004) Polymorphisms in the trace amine receptor 4 (TRAR4) gene on chromosome 6q23.2 are associated with susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 624–638
13.
Pimm, J. et al. (2005) The Epsin 4 gene on chromosome 5q, which encodes the clathrin-associated protein enthoprotin, is involved in the genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 902–907
14.
Petryshen, T.L. et al. (2005) Genetic investigation of chromosome 5q GABA(A) receptor subunit genes in schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 1074–1088
15.
Karayiorgou, M. et al. (1995) Schizophrenia susceptibility associated with interstitial deletions of chromosome 22q11. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7612–7616
16.
Pulver, A.E. et al. (1994) Psychotic illness in patients diagnosed with velo-cardio-facial syndrome and their relatives. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 182, 476–478
17.
Murphy, K.C. et al. (1999) High rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 940–945
18.
Liu, H. et al. (2002) Genetic variation in the 22q11 locus and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 16859–16864
19.
Li, T. et al. (2004) Evidence for association between novel polymorphisms in the PRODH gene and schizophrenia in a Chinese population. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 129B, 13–15
20.
Fallin, M.D. et al. (2005) Bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia: a 440-single-nucleotide polymorphism screen of 64 candidate genes among Ashkenazi Jewish case–parent trios. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 918–936
21.
Williams, H.J. et al. (2003) Association between PRODH and schizophrenia is not confirmed. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 644–645
22.
Gothelf, D. et al. (2005) COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1500–1502
23.
Jacquet, H. et al. (2002) PRODH mutations and hyperprolinemia in a subset of schizophrenic patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2243–2249
24.
Jacquet, H. et al. (2005) Hyperprolinemia is a risk factor for schizoaffective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 479–485
25.
Bender, H.U. et al. (2005) Functional consequences of PRODH missense mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 409–420
26.
Paterlini, M. et al. (2005) Transcriptional and behavioral interaction between 22q11.2 orthologs modulates schizophrenia-related phenotypes in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1586–1594
27.
Straub, R.E. et al. (1995) A potential vulnerability locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 6p24–22: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Nat. Genet. 11, 287–293
28.
Schwab, S.G. et al. (2003) Support for association of schizophrenia with genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene, dysbindin, in sib-pair families with linkage and in an additional sample of triad families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 185–190
29.
Tang, J.X. et al. (2003) Family-based association study of DTNBP1 in 6p22.3 and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 717–718
30.
Kirov, G. et al. (2004) Strong evidence for association between the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 gene (DTNBP1) and schizophrenia in 488 parent–offspring trios from Bulgaria. Biol. Psychiatry 55, 971–973
31.
Hall, D. et al. (2004) The contribution of three strong candidate schizophrenia susceptibility genes in demographically distinct populations. Genes Brain Behav. 3, 240–248
32.
De Luca, V. (2005) Untranslated region haplotype in dysbindin gene: analysis in schizophrenia. J. Neural Transm. 112, 1263–1267
33.
Li, W. et al. (2003) Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 7 (HPS-7) results from mutant dysbindin, a member of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1). Nat. Genet. 35, 84–89
34.
Benson, M.A. et al. (2001) Dysbindin, a novel coiled-coil-containing protein that interacts with the dystrobrevins in muscle and brain. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24232–24241
35.
Talbot, K. et al. (2004) Dysbindin-1 is reduced in intrinsic, glutamatergic terminals of the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1353–1363
36.
Weickert, C.S. et al. (2004) Human dysbindin (DTNBP1) gene expression in normal brain and in schizophrenic prefrontal cortex. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 544–555
37.
Numakawa, T. et al. (2004) Evidence of novel neuronal functions of dysbindin, a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2699–2708
38.
Stefansson, H. et al. (2003) Association of neuregulin 1 with schizophrenia confirmed in a Scottish population. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 83–87
39.
Yang, J.Z. et al. (2003) Association study of neuregulin 1 gene with schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 706–709
40.
Zhao, X. et al. (2004) A case control and family based association study of the neuregulin 1 gene and schizophrenia. J. Med. Genet. 41, 31–34
41.
Li, T. et al. (2004) Identification of a novel neuregulin 1 at-risk haplotype in Han schizophrenia Chinese patients, but no association with the Icelandic/Scottish risk haplotype. Mol. Psychiatry 9, 698–704
42.
Thiselton, D.L. et al. (2004) No evidence for linkage or association of neuregulin-1 (NRG1) with disease in the Irish study of high-density schizophrenia families (ISHDSF). Mol. Psychiatry 9, 777–783
43.
Duan, J. et al. (2005) Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) and schizophrenia: analysis of a US family sample and the evidence in the balance. Psychol. Med. 35, 1599–1610
44.
Corfas, G. et al. (2004) Neuregulin 1–erbB signaling and the molecular/ cellular basis of schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 575–580
45.
Detera-Wadleigh, S.D. et al. (1999) A high-density genome scan detects evidence for a bipolar-disorder susceptibility locus on 13q32 and other potential loci on 1q32 and 18p11.2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5604–5609
46.
Hattori, E. et al. (2003) Polymorphisms at the G72/G30 gene locus, on 13q33, are associated with bipolar disorder in two independent pedigree series. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 1131–1140
47.
Schumacher, J. et al. (2004) Examination of G72 and D-amino-acid oxidase as genetic risk factors for schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 9, 203–207
48.
Wang, X. et al. (2004) Association of G72/G30 with schizophrenia in the Chinese population. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 319, 1281–1286
49.
Addington, A.M. et al. (2004) Polymorphisms in the 13q32 gene G72/ G30 are associated with childhood-onset schizophrenia and psychosis not otherwise specified. Biol. Psychiatry 55, 976–980
50.
Korostishevsky, M. et al. (2004) Is the G72/G30 locus associated with schizophrenia? Single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, and gene expression analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 56, 169–176
51.
Korostishevsky, M. et al. (2006) Transmission disequilibrium and haplotype analyses of the G72/G30 locus: suggestive linkage to schizophrenia in Palestinian Arabs living in the north of Israel. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 141, 91–95
52.
Mulle, J.G. et al. (2005) No evidence for association to the G72/G30 locus in an independent sample of schizophrenia families. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 431–433
53.
Zou, F. et al. (2005) A family-based study of the association between the G72/G30 genes and schizophrenia in the Chinese population. Schizophr. Res. 73, 257–261
54.
Mothet, J.P. et al. (2000) d-serine is an endogenous ligand for the glycine site of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4926–4931
55.
Millar, J.K. et al. (2000) Disruption of two novel genes by a translocation co-segregating with schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1415–1423
56.
Ekelund, J. et al. (2001) Chromosome 1 loci in Finnish schizophrenia families. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1611–1617
57.
Callicott, J.H. et al. (2005) Variation in DISC1 affects hippocampal structure and function and increases risk for schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 8627–8632
58.
Hodgkinson, C.A. et al. (2004) Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DISC1): association with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 862–872
59.
Sachs, N.A. et al. (2005) A frameshift mutation in disrupted in schizophrenia 1 in an American family with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 758–764
60.
Millar, J.K. et al. (2005) DISC1 and PDE4B are interacting genetic factors in schizophrenia that regulate cAMP signaling. Science 310, 1187–1191
61.
Kamiya, A. et al. (2005) A schizophrenia-associated mutation of DISC1 perturbs cerebral cortex development. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 1067–1078
62.
Brzustowicz, L.M. et al. (2000) Location of a major susceptibility locus for familial schizophrenia on chromosome 1q21–q22. Science 288, 678–682
63.
Xu, B. et al. (2005) Increased expression in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of CAPON in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. PLoSMed. 2, e263
64.
Puri, V. et al. (2006) Failure to confirm allelic association between markers at the CAPON gene locus and schizophrenia in a British sample. Biol. Psychiatry 59, 195–197
65.
Zheng, Y. et al. (2005) Association of the carboxyl-terminal PDZ ligand of neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene with schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 328, 809–815
66.
Jaffrey, S.R. et al. (1998) CAPON: a protein associated with neuronal nitric oxide synthase that regulates its interactions with PSD95. Neuron 20, 115–124
67.
Chen, W.Y. et al. (2004) Case–control study and transmission disequilibrium test provide consistent evidence for association between schizophrenia and genetic variation in the 22q11 gene ZDHHC8. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2991–2995
68.
Glaser, B. et al. (2005) No association between the putative functional ZDHHC8 single nucleotide polymorphism rs175174 and schizophrenia in large European samples. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 78–80
69.
el-Husseini, A-D. and Bredt, D.S. (2002) Protein palmitoylation: a regulator of neuronal development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 791–802
70.
Levinson, D.F. et al. (2000) Multicenter linkage study of schizophrenia candidate regions on chromosomes 5q, 6q, 10p, and 13q: schizophrenia linkage collaborative group III. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 652–663
71.
Duan, S. et al. (2006) Failure to find association between TRAR4 and schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population. J. Neural Transm. 113, 381–385
72.
Ikeda, M. et al. (2005) No association of haplotype-tagging SNPs in TRAR4 with schizophrenia in Japanese patients. Schizophr. Res. 78, 127–130
73.
Abou Jamra, R. et al. (2005) A family-based and case–control association study of trace amine receptor genes on chromosome 6q23 in bipolar affective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 618–620
74.
Borowsky, B. et al. (2001) Trace amines: identification of a family of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8966–8971
75.
Wasiak, S. et al. (2002) Enthoprotin: a novel clathrin-associated protein identified through subcellular proteomics. J. Cell Biol. 158, 855–862
76.
Sklar, P. et al. (2004) Genome-wide scan in Portuguese Island families identifies 5q31–5q35 as a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia and psychosis. Mol. Psychiatry 9, 213–218
77.
Roberts, E. (1972) Prospects for research on schizophrenia. A hypothesis suggesting that there is a defect in the GABA system in schizophrenia. Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 10, 468–482
78.
Lewis, D.A. et al. (2005) Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 312–324
79.
Egan, M.F. et al. (2001) Effect of COMT Val108/158 Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 6917–6922
80.
Lohmueller, K.E. et al. (2003) Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat. Genet. 33, 177–182
81.
Fan, J.B. et al. (2005) Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene Val/Met functional polymorphism and risk of schizophrenia: a large-scale association study plus meta-analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 139–144
82.
Glatt, S.J. et al. (2003) Association between a functional catechol O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism and schizophrenia: meta-analysis of case–control and family-based studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 160, 469–476
83.
Munafo, M.R. et al. (2005) Lack of association of the COMT (Val158/108 Met) gene and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of case–control studies. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 765–770
84.
Williams, H.J. et al. (2005) No association between schizophrenia and polymorphisms in COMT in two large samples. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1736–1738
85.
Tsai, S.J. et al. (2006) Lack of association of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene Val108/158Met polymorphism with schizophrenia: a family-based association study in a Chinese population. Mol. Psychiatry 11, 2–3
86.
Shifman, S. et al. (2002) A highly significant association between a COMT haplotype and schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 1296–1302
87.
Ho, B.C. et al. (2005) Catechol-O-methyl transferase Val(158)Met gene polymorphism in schizophrenia: working memory, frontal lobe MRI morphology and frontal cerebral blood flow. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 287–298
88.
Chen, J. et al. (2004) Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 807–821
89.
Bray, N.J. et al. (2003) A haplotype implicated in schizophrenia susceptibility is associated with reduced COMT expression in human brain. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 152–161
90.
Mirnics, K. et al. (2000) Molecular characterization of schizophrenia viewed by microarray analysis of gene expression in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 28, 53–67
91.
Chowdari, K.V. et al. (2002) Association and linkage analyses of RGS4 polymorphisms in schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1373–1380
92.
Chen, X. et al. (2004) Regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4) gene is associated with schizophrenia in Irish high density families. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 129, 23–26
93.
Zhang, F. et al. (2005) Association analysis of the RGS4 gene in Han Chinese and Scottish populations with schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 4, 444–448
94.
Sobell, J.L. et al. (2005) Failure to confirm association between RGS4 haplotypes and schizophrenia in Caucasians. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 139, 23–27
95.
Larminie, C. et al. (2004) Selective expression of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) in the human central nervous system. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 122, 24–34
96.
Ross, E.M. and Wilkie, T.M. (2000) GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 795–827
97.
Miyakawa, T. et al. (2003) Conditional calcineurin knockout mice exhibit multiple abnormal behaviors related to schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 8987–8992
98.
Gerber, D.J. et al. (2003) Evidence for association of schizophrenia with genetic variation in the 8p21.3 gene, PPP3CC, encoding the calcineurin γ subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 8993–8998
99.
Eastwood, S.L. (2005) Decreased hippocampal expression of the susceptibility gene PPP3CC and other calcineurin subunits in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 702–710
100.
Freimer, N. and Sabatti, C. (2004) The use of pedigree, sib-pair and association studies of common diseases for genetic mapping and epidemiology. Nat. Genet. 36, 1045–1051

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 1 August 2006
Published in print: August 2006

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Focus

PPV Articles - Focus

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share