Skip to main content
Full access
Letter to the Editor
Published Online: 1 April 2001

Poststroke Depression

Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
To the Editor: We compliment the efforts of Robert G. Robinson, M.D., and colleagues (1) on the study of the treatment of poststroke depression. However, there are several limitations that caution against complete acceptance of their results.
The authors stated that 85% of the 104 patients were randomly assigned to either nortriptyline or fluoxetine. Recalling that 48 of the total were nondepressed and demonstrated no significant differences, we are really looking at the remaining 56 patients. Of the depressed fluoxetine group of 23, only 14 (61%) were randomly assigned. Likewise, of the 16 in the depressed nortriptyline group, only eight (50%) were actually randomized. It is hard to feel assured of the superiority of nortriptyline to fluoxetine when comparing only 14 randomized patients to eight. In addition, only one patient’s data on nortriptyline treatment after placebo were analyzed.
It is not surprising that pushing elderly patients up to a mandatory dose of 40 mg/day of fluoxetine would lead to akathisia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and dropout. After polling our colleagues, we found it exceedingly rare that any of our patients over 65 years of age were taking 40 mg/day of fluoxetine, and, anecdotally, no one could think of a reference equating that dose to 100 mg/day of nortriptyline.
Although the authors may have used a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 12 or higher as the criterion for depression, most studies have used 17 or greater as an inclusion criterion (2). Using a smaller interval set at the lower level may capture different patients. Compounding that variable is the broad range of weeks poststroke in the fluoxetine group (mean=16, SD=35) in contrast to that of the nortriptyline group (mean=5, SD=4). The highest incidence of depression, to our knowledge, was reported at 2–7 weeks poststroke (3). One wonders how this might influence such small, randomly assigned groups.
Of concern is the 12-week cutoff point. Elderly patients are known to respond to antidepressants much later than other patients, and that is particularly so for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In addition, there are now data indicating that patients taking SSRIs gain weight after 12 weeks, so this would not have been noted (4). Granted, patients taking tricyclics may keep gaining weight longer. This is not always of benefit, particularly when elderly patients need assistance transferring from bed to chair.
There are other studies that have shown SSRIs to be efficacious in treating poststroke depression (35). Methodological flaws in this study make it difficult to draw firm conclusions that can be applied to patient treatment until larger populations are studied.

References

1.
Robinson RG, Shultz SK, Castillo C, Kopel T, Kosier JT, Newman RM, Curdue K, Petracca G, Starkstein SE: Nortriptyline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of depression and in short-term recovery after stroke: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:351–359
2.
Endicott J, Cohen J, Nee J, Fleiss J, Sarantakos S: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: extracted from regular and change versions of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38:98–103
3.
Andersen G, Vestergaard K, Lauritzen L: Effective treatment of poststroke depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram. Stroke 1994; 25:1099–1104
4.
Sussman N, Ginsberg DL: Weight gain associated with SSRIs: a paradox? Primary Psychiatry 1998; 5:28–39
5.
Dam M, Tonin P, De Boni A, Pizzolato G, Casson S, Ermani M, Freo U, Piron L, Battistin L: Effects of fluoxetine and maprotiline on functional recovery in poststroke hemiplegic patients undergoing rehabilitation therapy. Stroke 1996, 27:1211–1214

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 658-a - 659

History

Published online: 1 April 2001
Published in print: April 2001

Authors

Affiliations

SHISHUKA MALHOTRA, M.D.
Cleveland, Ohio

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share