Alexithymia and Personality in Relation to Dimensions of Psychopathology
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the capacity of alexithymia to predict a broad range of psychiatric symptoms relative to that of other personality dimensions, age, and gender. METHOD: The Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Temperament and Character Inventory, and the SCL-90-R were administered to 254 psychiatric patients. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The difficulties identifying feelings factor of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale significantly predicted all SCL-90-R subscale scores and was particularly effective, relative to the personality dimensions of the Temperament and Character Inventory, in predicting somatization. The Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions emerged as distinct and conceptually meaningful predictors for the different SCL-90-R subscales. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of current psychopathology is associated with difficulties in cognitively processing emotional perceptions. Further research needs to clarify whether alexithymia represents a risk factor for mental illness and poorer outcome.
Most psychotherapeutic approaches aim to increase the perceptual awareness of emotional processes, to enhance emotional differentiation, and to enable—through insight or cognitive behavioral strategies—new emotional experiences to help overcome dysfunctional mental states. These emotional deficits may be in fact described as alexithymia (1), focusing primarily on disturbances of affect recognition, affect differentiation, and on the expression of feelings. Although alexithymia was first studied in a variety of medical and psychosomatic disorders (1, 2), more recent studies have associated alexithymia with dissociation (3), depression (1, 4, 5), anxiety disorders, hypochondria, and eating disorders (1). However, the contribution of alexithymia in interaction with common personality traits to psychopathology has not been investigated systematically. This is important because alexithymia is captured up to 50% by personality models like the five-factor model of personality or Cloninger’s psychobiological model of personality (6, 7). We hypothesized that disturbances in identifying and differentiating feelings would predict a broad range of psychopathology.
Method
The study group consisted of 254 randomly selected, postacute inpatients and outpatients (156 women and 98 men). All patients were Caucasian and gave written informed consent after receiving full explanation of the study. Patient diagnoses were made according to DSM-IV. The study group comprised subjects with depressive disorders (N=78), anxiety disorders (N=34), obsessive-compulsive disorder (N=28), schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (N=32), borderline personality disorder (N=36), dissociative disorder (N=10), mixed personality disorder (N=18), alcohol dependency (N=9), and somatization disorder (N=9).
Alexithymia was assessed with the German-language translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (8–10), which comprised three factors: 1) difficulties identifying feelings, 2) difficulties expressing feelings, and 3) externally orientated thinking. Personality was assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory (11, 12), a 240-item, forced-choice, self-report scale. The SCL-90-R (13), a 90-item self-report scale, was used to assess current psychopathology on nine subscales. All reported scores provided dimensional information, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of alexithymia, a more extreme expression of personality traits, and poorer psychopathology, respectively.
Nine linear regression analyses were calculated using the subscores of the SCL-90-R as dependent variables. The Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale factors, age, and gender were entered blockwise (multivariate) into each of the nine equations as independent variables. The significance of the explained amount of variance (R2) by the regression equation compared with the total variance of the dependent variable was assessed by using analysis of variance. For each independent variable, a standardized regression coefficient (β) is reported, which is based on a prior z transformation of the independent variables. Therefore, β indicates the relative magnitude of prediction of each independent variable. The significance of β was evaluated by a t statistic. All predictor variables had tolerance values >0.4 excluding collinearity.
Results
High scores on difficulties identifying feelings emerged as a major predictor for current psychopathology on all SCL-90-R subscales and were particularly effective in predicting “somatization” (Table 1). Except for a weak prediction of “phobia” by low externally orientated thinking, none of the SCL-90-R subscales were predicted by difficulties expressing feelings or externally orientated thinking. Gender (male subjects) only emerged as a weak predictor for “aggression.”
Discussion
The results support our hypothesis that the difficulties identifying feelings feature of alexithymia is highly predictive of a broad range of “state” levels of psychopathology, particularly somatization. This leads to the assumption that many mentally ill patients are faced with confusing and strange emotional perceptions that cannot be transformed into meaningful feelings. In contrast, difficulties expressing feelings and externally orientated thinking were almost not predictive for any of the SCL-90-R scores.
The validity of our approach receives support from the fact that distinct and theoretically reasonable patterns of Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions predicted different psychopathological dimensions. A considerable degree of variance (30%–52%) of the SCL-90-R subscales could be explained by the predictors.
Because of the cross-sectional design of our study, we cannot conclude that alexithymia represents a risk factor for the development of mental disorders. However, following the considerations of Taylor and Bagby (1), we hypothesize that preexisting difficulties in identifying and differentiating feelings predispose someone to emotional dysregulation in stressful situations or relationships, thus creating emotional confusion followed by inadequate behavioral responses. Nevertheless, it seems that dysfunctional psychopathological states additionally alter the ability to cognitively process emotional information (4). Some studies also suggest that alexithymia is associated with poorer outcome (1). Therefore, specific psychotherapeutic techniques improving affect differentiation should be evaluated (1, 14). Besides the necessary replication of our results, further prospective studies should clarify the role of alexithymia as a putative risk factor for mental illness.
Footnote
Received Aug. 21, 2003; revisions received Dec. 3 and Dec. 29, 2003; accepted Jan. 9, 2004. From the Department of Psychiatry, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald. Address reprint requests to Dr. Grabe, Department of Psychiatry, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald, Klinikum der Hansestadt Stralsund, Rostocker Chaussee 70, 18437 Stralsund, Germany; [email protected] (e-mail).
References
1.
Taylor GJ, Bagby RM: An overview of the alexithymia construct, in Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. Edited by Baron R, Parker JDA. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp 40–67
2.
Lumley MA, Asselin LA, Norman S: Alexithymia in chronic pain patients. Compr Psychiatry 1997; 38:160–165
3.
Grabe HJ, Rainermann S, Spitzer C, Gänsicke M, Freyberger HJ: The relationship between dimensions of alexithymia and dissociation. Psychother Psychosom 2000; 69:128–131
4.
Honkalampi K, Hintikka J, Laukkanen E, Lehtonen J, Viinamaki H: Alexithymia and depression: a prospective study of patients with major depressive disorder. Psychosomatics 2001; 42:229–234
5.
Wise TN, Mann LS, Hill B: Alexithymia and depressed mood in the psychiatric patient. Psychother Psychosom 1990; 54:26–31
6.
Luminet O, Bagby RM, Wagner H, Taylor GJ, Parker JD: Relation between alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality: a facet-level analysis. J Pers Assess 1999; 73:345–358
7.
Grabe HJ, Spitzer C, Freyberger HJ: Alexithymia and the temperament and character model of personality. Psychother Psychosom 2001; 70:261–270
8.
Bach M, Bach D, de Zwaan M, Serim M, Böhmer F: Validierung der deutschen Version der 20-Item Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala bei Normalpersonen und psychiatrischen Patienten. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1996; 46:23–28
9.
Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JDA: The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, I: item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38:23–32
10.
Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JDA: The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale, II: convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res 1994; 38:33–40
11.
Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR: A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:975–990
12.
Richter J, Eisenmann M, Richter G, Cloninger CR: Das Temperament und Charakter Inventar (TCI): ein Leitfaden über seine Entwicklung und Anwendung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany, Swets Test Services, 1999
13.
Franke G: Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis—deutsche Version—Manual (SCL-90-R). Weinheim, Germany, Beltz, 1994
14.
Fukunishi I, Kikuchi M, Takubo M: Changes in scores on alexithymia over a period of psychiatric treatment. Psychol Rep 1997; 80:483–489
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 1 July 2004
Published in print: July 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).