Deep Dyslexia in Chinese Primary Progressive Aphasia of Semantic Variant

A right-handed 56-year-old Chinese Singaporean man had difficulty in comprehending sentences for 1 year. He received a Chinese-stream education up to secondary school. Neurobehavioral assessments showed fluent spontaneous speech and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 19 of 30. The patient had a score of 3 of 15 on the modified version of the Boston Naming Test, naming a camel as “duck” and a bench as “table,” and he failed to comprehend 14 of 15 items after a 30-minute interval. Reading tasks of 10 words, 10 sentences, and a short passage from the standard modern Chinese version of the Bilingual Aphasia Battery were delivered. The patient committed a total of 21 reading errors, with 16 being deep dyslexic in nature. Examples of the responses are summarized in Table 1. An MRI scan of the brain showed left anterior temporal atrophy and a [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scan showed predominant left anterior temporal hypometabolism (Figure 1).

The literature describing acquired dyslexia in the Chinese language remains sparse to date. Although patients with English-speaking–acquired deep dyslexia are mostly described with larger left perisylvian lesions (e.g., by stroke),¹ the rarity of literature describing this condition in Chinese-speaking individuals likely suggests a different mechanism underpinning such phenomenology. The Chinese language is ideographic and is generally believed to be lacking in grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Yin and Weekes³ proposed the triangle model of Chinese reading, where phonology output is directly imprinted into orthography in nonsemantic pathway reading. Other evidence agrees with the above notion that access to Chinese language phonology is distinct from alphabetic language.⁴ Shu et al.⁵ as well as Yin and Butterworth⁶ described cases of deep dyslexia that were either developmental, traumatic or vascular-related brain lesions, which were explained well by the triangle model. However, most patients suffered more diffuse and less well-localized lesions. Thus, more determining or precise brain-behavior correlation is challenging.

The current literature suggests the left temporal pole as the convergence region for semantic knowledge. In addition, a recent report by Busigny et al.⁷ suggested a case for lexico-facio-semantics disassociation, secondary to a dysfunction of the left anterior temporal lobe. Because Chinese is an ideographic language in which semantic data are tagged to each individual character, we speculate that this region also serves as a center of convergence of lexical semantics of the language. This most likely mediates the semantic relevance of orthographical representations, in this case, seen through an impaired nonsemantic reading pathway.

In conclusion, we propose the left anterior temporal region as a convergence point of Chinese lexical semantics; therefore, this region deserves further future studies.