Skip to main content
Full access
Case Reports
Published Online: 14 November 2017

Olanzapine Improved Symptoms and Olfactory Function in an Olfactory Reference Syndrome Patient

Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Olfactory reference syndrome (ORS) is characterized by the core false belief that one emits a foul or unpleasant body odor.1 Although ORS has been described for a century and across cultures,2 no studies of olfactory function in individuals with this diagnostically challenging disorder have been reported. In the present case report, we characterize the olfactory function of a patient with ORS at baseline and after a short, self-administered course of olanzapine. Our findings empirically support the observation that odor stimuli in the environment can trigger parosmia and that concurrent parosmic perception of the malodor compromises the patient’s olfactory function at baseline. Furthermore, we found that olanzapine treatment, which produces improvements in parosmia, was accompanied by an improvement in the patient’s olfactory function. These novel findings have implications for how clinicians might think about the impact of ORS and its treatment on olfactory function and the ongoing debate regarding the classification and differential diagnosis of this complex and debilitating set of clinical features.2

Case Report

“Mr. A,” a 69-year-old man with a lifelong history of depression and chronic hepatitis C, presented with the chief complaint of the emission of a foul body odor for the past 5 years. The patient indicated that this stereotyped “rotten fish” perception was only evoked by smelling (i.e., it was not present when he was breathing ambient air). The patient did not recollect having an upper respiratory tract infection prior to the onset of parosmia. His daily functioning was significantly impaired due to the parosmia (e.g., he avoided social situations because of shame and fear of judgment). He also reported delusions of reference, such as the belief that people “cover their nose” and “recoil in disgust” when near him. In order to cope with the parosmia, he engaged in ORS-related repetitive behaviors, such as washing his hands and sniffing at and changing his clothes. This social avoidance and repetitive behavioral repertoire is consistent with features reported in other case reports of ORS.35
The patient received a score of 27 on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for ORS,5 indicating ORS with moderate severity. In the course of a week, he spent 3–8 hours a day obsessing over the parosmia. He had a history of intravenous drug abuse, and in 1992, he was diagnosed with hepatitis C viral infection. He last used intravenous drugs 29 years prior to participating in our smell testing. He presently receives hydroxyzine (25 mg) and orally ingests medical marijuana (1/3 g in oil form) once or twice a week to “calm his nerves.” He is not being regularly followed by a psychotherapist.
To examine the patient’s ability to identify odors, we administered an abridged version of the POEM [Percepts of Odor Episodic Memory] olfactory battery,6 which was modified to include a question asking whether the odor presented evoked a parosmic perception (see Figure 1A). At baseline, the patient reported that 60% of the 20 different odors presented (N=12) elicited a parosmic perception (see Figure 1B). He exhibited a significant odor percept identification deficit compared with clinically normal age-matched controls, correctly identifying only 30% of the presented odors, compared with the age-matched cognitively normal individuals, who were able to identify 76% of odors presented on average.6 To look for an interaction between the parosmia and odor identification, we recalculated the patient’s odor identification accuracy for odors that did/did not evoke the perception of a foul body odor. Among the 12 odors that evoked the perception of a foul body odor, the patient was only able to correctly identify one odor (8.33%). Among the nonparosmic odors (N=8), he correctly identified five odors (63%).
FIGURE 1. The Patient’s OPID-20 Scores at Baseline and After Treatment With Olanzapinea
a OPID-20=Odor Percept Identification-20 test.
The patient scored in the normal range on the Boston Naming Test (29/30 correct), and he scored in the low-normal range on the Blessed Dementia Scale (31/37 correct).
One week after the baseline test, which included an acute, 3-day, low-dose course of olanzapine (2.5 mg days 5–7), the patient was retested with an identical olfactory battery. Olanzapine, which has been used in cases of ORS,79 was reported by the patient to reduce parosmia in the past. In our odor-evoked experimental setting, it was similarly effective. Following treatment with the drug, the patient only found 40% of the odors (N=8) parosmic (see Figure 1B). His overall odor identification accuracy on the Odor Percept Identification-20 test improved from 30% to 45%. Interestingly, he showed a higher degree of accuracy in naming parosmic (63%, 5/8) versus nonparosmic (33%, 4/12) odors. All of the parosmic odors (except one) identified post-treatment were the same as those identified pre-treatment. Of the seven parosmic odors, unchanged by the drug condition, 14% were identified correctly (N=1) at baseline (pre-treatment), whereas 71% were identified correctly in the post-treatment condition (N=5).
Overall, olanzapine positively affected the patient’s response to nine of the 20 odors presented during the odor identification test. Four odors (leather, orange, pineapple, and peach) incorrectly identified at baseline were correctly identified in the drug condition. Four odors (strawberry, lilac, smoke, and lemon) that elicited parosmia at baseline no longer elicited parosmia in the drug condition. The odor of grape, which was both incorrectly identified and elicited parosmia at baseline, was correctly identified and nonparosmic in the drug condition.
Olanzapine negatively affected two of the 20 odors presented during the odor identification test. The odor for dirt was the only odor of the 20 presented that was newly parosmic in the drug condition. It was also identified incorrectly in the drug condition, while it had been correctly identified at baseline. The odor for grass was identified incorrectly in the drug condition, while it was correctly identified at baseline.
The patient’s response (parosmia and odor identification) to the remaining nine odors (menthol, clove, soap, banana, garlic, cherry, baby powder, fruit punch, and chocolate) was unchanged by the drug.

Discussion

Our patient, who had been suffering from ORS symptoms for more than 5 years, showed a marked odor identification deficit, compared with age-matched controls, and a high frequency of odor-evoked parosmia. The odor identification deficit is unlikely due to a global naming deficit or the presence of dementia. At baseline, the patient named nonparosmic odors with greater accuracy, suggesting that evoked parosmia negatively affected his naming of parosmic odors. Given this result, we speculated that the neural basis of the parosmia associated with ORS may resemble instances of parosmia reported in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) that are associated with the perception of a noxious odor. In these TLE cases, the hyperexcitability of the cortex results in deficits in higher olfactory processing.10
Based on this model, we hypothesized that a drug that reduces parosmia would afford beneficial effects in olfactory processing, reflected as improved accuracy of odor identification. The patient reported that he had used a low dose of olanzapine acutely in the past to reduce the foul-odor perception triggered by his parosmia. In the setting of olfactory testing after the olanzapine course, we confirmed that fewer odors evoked parosmia, and we found an improvement in the patient’s performance on the odor naming task. Surprisingly, odors that no longer evoked parosmia were not more likely to be accurately identified. Rather, improvements in identification in the drug condition were more marked among odors that continued to evoke parosmia. This dissociation of odors with improved identification and improved parosmia, relative to the olanzapine-free testing, may be due to divergent effects of olanzapine on the generation of hedonic percept of parosmia and the semantic processing of parosmic odors.
The complex pharmacology of olanzapine includes antagonism of the serotonin (5-HT2A, 5-HT3, and 5-HT6) and cholinergic (M2) receptors. We speculate that one or more of these activities could account for the clinical improvement witnessed in our patient. The 5-HT6 receptor is highly expressed in the olfactory tubercle in the rat brain.11 The olfactory tubercle is highly interconnected across brain regions and has been implicated as a site of integration across olfactory, visual, and auditory sensory input as part of the olfactory cortex,12 as well as a candidate region for associating odor stimuli with hedonic and motivated behavior as part of the straitum.13 Additionally, it receives input from the hippocampus and reciprocally communicates with the amygdala, thalamus, hypothalamus, and brainstem. Although its specific role in odor processing is still being characterized, neurons in this region do show odor-evoked activity (which increases when an odor is attended to), as well as odor-selective activity (which may be relevant for odor discrimination).12
It is likely that 5-HT6 is expressed in the olfactory tubercle as a population of heteroreceptors on GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons, since it is in the hippocampus and the cortex.11 This positions the 5-HT6 receptor, and its antagonist olanzapine, as a potential regulator of the balance of excitatory-inhibitory signaling in the region (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio), with consequences for a higher-order olfactory processing task (e.g., odor identification). Indeed, electrophysiological characterization of the intrinsic properties of olfactory tubercle neurons suggests that the region contains glutamatergic and GABAergic networks.12 The mechanistic implications of this antagonism for the observed reduction of parosmia (in relation to a role for this region in odor hedonics) are intriguing and hereto unexplored.
Olanzapine’s high-affinity antagonism of the 5-HT2A receptor also may modulate GABAergic input sent to the hippocampus from the medial septum/diagonal band of Broca (MSDB). MSDB neurons can be activated in rat brain slices by bath application of serotonin (through the activation of the 5-HT2A receptor) and inhibited by application of atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine, suggesting that a population of septohippocampal neurons may be a target for the action of this class of drugs.14 A disinhibition of GABAergic septohippocampal input to pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, in a low-dose drug condition, may enhance odor naming and memory in an odor identification task.15
An effect on cholinergic neuromodulation by olanzapine could have relevant implications for the coding of odor representations and aspects of olfactory learning and plasticity. Cholinesterase inhibitors have been shown to augment muscarinic cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain.16,17 A feedback loop has been described between cholinergic afferents from the diagonal band of Broca (HDB) in the Ch3 nucleus of the basal forebrain, the olfactory bulb, and the piriform cortex.18 The granule and glomerular layers of the olfactory bulb receive extensive cholinergic input from the HDB.19,20 Microdialysis studies show increased levels of extracellular acetylcholine in the olfactory bulb when HDB input to the olfactory bulb is activated electrically or chemically,21 which is thought to affect the excitability of granule and periglomerular cells.22 Cholinergic input to the piriform cortex is thought to increase the excitability of neurons and the plasticity of synapses in this region. Conversely, changes in the activity of piriform cortex neurons associated with odor familiarity/novelty have been shown, computationally and experimentally, to modulate incoming cholinergic input through feedback mechanisms.18 Interactions within this complex system of cholinergic circuits may be relevant to our findings, since olanzapine is known to produce increases in cholinergic function via antagonism of M2 autoreceptors. In a recent study, 12-week exposure to the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil improved accuracy on the 40-item UPSIT [the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test] in elderly individuals.23
In addition to direct modulation of olfactory function, olanzapine’s mood-stabilizing, and potentially anxiolytic,24 properties may be relevant to our clinical observations by contributing broadly to a reduction in parosmia and an elevation in mood. Previous work has shown that patients with parosmia for more than 2 years have smaller olfactory bulbs and marked gray matter loss in the left anterior insula, right anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral hippocampus, and left medial orbitofrontal cortex,25 suggesting that parosmia may be an emergent symptom of interpreted neural circuit dysfunction across multiple brain regions in the limbic system. The size and location of the olfactory tubercle in human brain preclude a detailed analysis of this region via MRI26 in patients with parosmia.
Further studies (e.g., using odor-evoked functional MRI) conducted in ORS patients may reveal the mechanisms with which olanzapine affects parosmia and olfactory processing. Moreover, a longer drug exposure may produce longer-lasting effects and a more profound reduction of parosmia throughout the olfactory battery. Taken together, our findings indicate that olfactory function is compromised in our ORS patient, the experience of parosmia worsens odor identification, and olanzapine therapy may offer olfactory functional benefits in conjunction with symptomatic relief of parosmia in patients diagnosed with ORS.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participant in this study for his time and effort. The authors also thank J.L. Greenberg, Psy.D., and S. Wilhelm, Ph.D., and the Editors of the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, David B. Arciniegas, M.D., and C. Alan Anderson, M.D., for providing constructive comments.

References

1.
Thomas E, du Plessis S, Chiliza B, et al: Olfactory reference disorder: diagnosis, epidemiology and management. CNS Drugs 2015; 29:999–1007
2.
Feusner JD, Phillips KA, Stein DJ: Olfactory reference syndrome: issues for DSM-V. Depress Anxiety 2010; 27:592–599
3.
Lochner C, Stein DJ: Olfactory reference syndrome: diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49:328–331
4.
Stein DJ, Le Roux L, Bouwer C, et al: Is olfactory reference syndrome an obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder? two cases and a discussion. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10:96–99
5.
Greenberg JL, Shaw AM, Reuman L, et al: Clinical features of olfactory reference syndrome: an internet-based study. J Psychosom Res 2016; 80:11–16
6.
Dhilla Albers A, Asafu-Adjei J, Delaney MK, et al: Episodic memory of odors stratifies Alzheimer biomarkers in normal elderly. Ann Neurol 2016; 80:846–857
7.
Aksu EE, Aksu H, Tabo A, et al: Olfactory reference syndrome: a case report. J Psychiatry Neurological Sci 2010; 23:133–136
8.
Prazeres AM, Fontenelle LF, Mendlowicz MV, et al: Olfactory reference syndrome as a subtype of body dysmorphic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:87–89
9.
Özten E, Hizli Sayar G, Tufan AE, et al: Olfactory reference syndrome: a case treated with sertraline and olanzapine. Sch J Med Case Rep 2013; 1:44–46
10.
Jacek S, Stevenson RJ, Miller LA: Olfactory dysfunction in temporal lobe epilepsy: a case of ictus-related parosmia. Epilepsy Behav 2007; 11:466–470
11.
Helboe L, Egebjerg J, de Jong IE: Distribution of serotonin receptor 5-HT6 mRNA in rat neuronal subpopulations: a double in situ hybridization study. Neuroscience 2015; 310:442–454
12.
Wesson DW, Wilson DA: Sniffing out the contributions of the olfactory tubercle to the sense of smell: hedonics, sensory integration, and more? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011; 35:655–668
13.
Yamaguchi M: Functional sub-circuits of the olfactory system viewed from the olfactory bulb and the olfactory tubercle. Front Neuroanat 2017; 11:33
14.
Liu W, Alreja M: Atypical antipsychotics block the excitatory effects of serotonin in septohippocampal neurons in the rat. Neuroscience 1997; 79:369–382
15.
Wu M, Shanabrough M, Leranth C, et al: Cholinergic excitation of septohippocampal GABA but not cholinergic neurons: implications for learning and memory. J Neurosci 2000; 20:3900–3908
16.
Velayudhan L, Pritchard M, Powell JF, et al: Smell identification function as a severity and progression marker in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr 2013; 25:1157–1166
17.
Schofield PW, Ebrahimi H, Jones AL, et al: An olfactory ‘stress test’ may detect preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurol 2012; 12:24
18.
de Almeida L, Idiart M, Dean O, et al: Internal cholinergic regulation of learning and recall in a model of olfactory processing. Front Cell Neurosci 2016; 10:256
19.
Arciniegas DB: Cholinergic dysfunction and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury, part 1: the structure and function of cerebral cholinergic systems. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2011; 26:98–101
20.
Hamamoto M, Kiyokage E, Sohn J, et al: Structural basis for cholinergic regulation of neural circuits in the mouse olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 2017; 525:574–591
21.
Uchida S, Kagitani F: Effect of basal forebrain stimulation on extracellular acetylcholine release and blood flow in the olfactory bulb. J Physiol Sci (Epub ahead of print, May 12, 2017)
22.
Fletcher ML, Chen WR: Neural correlates of olfactory learning: critical role of centrifugal neuromodulation. Learn Mem 2010; 17:561–570
23.
Pelton GH, Soleimani L, Roose SP, et al: Olfactory deficits predict cognitive improvement on donepezil in patients with depression and cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled pilot study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2016; 30:67–69
24.
Sun T, He W, Hu G, et al: Anxiolytic-like property of risperidone and olanzapine as examined in multiple measures of fear in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010; 95:298–307
25.
Bitter T, Siegert F, Gudziol H, et al: Gray matter alterations in parosmia. Neuroscience 2011; 177:177–182
26.
Gottfried JA: Central mechanisms of odour object perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010; 11:628–641

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Pages: 164 - 167
PubMed: 29132274

History

Received: 10 May 2017
Revision received: 3 August 2017
Revision received: 24 August 2017
Accepted: 24 August 2017
Published online: 14 November 2017
Published in print: Spring 2018

Keywords

  1. Olfactory Reference Syndrome
  2. Olanzapine
  3. Parosmia
  4. Olfaction

Authors

Details

Alefiya Dhilla Albers, Ph.D.
From the Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (ADA, IA, MWA); and the Department of Psychology, Endicott College, Beverly, Mass. (ADA).
Ilaria Amato, B.S.
From the Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (ADA, IA, MWA); and the Department of Psychology, Endicott College, Beverly, Mass. (ADA).
Mark W. Albers, M.D., Ph.D. [email protected]
From the Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (ADA, IA, MWA); and the Department of Psychology, Endicott College, Beverly, Mass. (ADA).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Albers; email: [email protected]

Author Contributions

Dr. Albers and Ms. Amato are both first authors.

Funding Information

Wilkens Foundation
NIH: DP2-OD000662
Supported by NIH DP2-OD000662 (awarded to M.W.A.), NIH R44 AG051311 (subcontract awarded to M.W.A.), and the Wilkens Foundation (awarded to M.W.A.).Dr. Albers receives consulting fees from International Flavors and Fragrances. All other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share