Topography of Cholinergic Changes in Dementia With Lewy Bodies and Key Neural Network Hubs

FEOBV PET data from a subset of the participants in this study were previously reported in a FEOBV PET methods study (1). The present study is based on the previously described PET quantification method but has a different (i.e., voxel-based) group PET comparison approach that enables subregional granular brain assessment.

The patients were recruited at the Cognitive Disorders Clinic in the University of Michigan Health system. Third International Consensus criteria were used to diagnose probable DLB (13). The control group was acquired from our poll of the existing normal control elderly PET database matched with our patients’ age and gender. At the time of the PET scans, the normal controls had a normal neurological examination with no history of neurological or psychiatric diseases. Any participants who had evidence of large vessel strokes or other intracranial lesions were excluded from the current study. Written informed consent (or assent) was collected from the participant (or legal representative) before study participation. The study was approved by the University of Michigan Medical Institutional Review Board and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All participants underwent brain MRIs and delayed acquisition (3–3.5 hours, scanned every 5 minutes for a total of six frames) [¹⁸F]-FEOBV (bolus intravenous of 8 mCi) PET. T₁-weighted imaging was performed on a 3-T Philips Achieva system (Philips, Best, the Netherlands). A three‐dimensional inversion recovery‐prepared turbo field echo was performed in the sagittal plane (repetition time/echo time/inversion time=9.8/4.6/1,041 ms; turbo factor=200; single average; field of view=240×200×160 mm; acquired matrix=240×200×160 slices) and reconstructed to 1‐mm isotropic resolution. PET imaging was performed in three-dimensional imaging mode with a Siemens ECAT Exact HR+tomograph, as previously reported (14). [¹⁸F]-FEOBV was prepared in high radiochemical purity (>95%) (15). Delayed dynamic imaging was performed over 30 minutes (in six 5-minute frames) starting 3 hours after an intravenous bolus dose injection of 8 mCi [¹⁸F]-FEOBV (3). The PET imaging frames were spatially coregistered within subjects with a rigid-body transformation to reduce the effects of subject motion during the imaging session.

The Freesurfer software suite was used to create a supratentorial white matter mask. The mask included only voxels from the Freesurfer white matter segmentation that was above the ventricle. The mask was further eroded using a morphological filter to avoid partial volume effects from the cortical areas and include only the core voxels of supratentorial white matter voxels. The remaining voxels after this procedure comprised the reference region. The mean image from the six delayed-imaging frames was normalized using the reference region to create parametric images that reflected the distribution volume ratios (1). All parametric PET images and the registered structural MR images were processed using high-dimensional DARTEL registration; spatial normalization to a template space in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space; and segmentation into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid using the SPM12 software package. The parametric PET images were corrected for partial volume effects using the Müller-Gartner (16) method before being normalized into MNI space. The normalized images were spatially smoothed (full width at half maximum=8 mm) to remove random noise.

Group comparison of demographic and clinical data of the DLB and normal control subjects was performed using Student’s t or chi-square testing (where group classification was the independent variable and the demographic and clinical measures were the dependent variables). Using SPM12, we applied voxel-based two-sample t tests comparing the corrected and spatially normalized parametric images between groups. The between-group statistical parametric mapping results were thresholded at voxel level (p<0.001) and corrected for whole-brain comparisons using peak-level false discovery rate (p<0.005). Clusters that survived the peak-level false discovery rate were interpreted as significant.

This cross-sectional study consisted of five participants with DLB (females, N=3; males, N=2), with an average age of 77.8 years (SD=4.2), an average disease duration of 4.5 years (SD=2.1; median=6; range=4), and a mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (17) score of 18.6 (SD=4.8). The core clinical criteria of the participants with DLB are presented in Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the DLB and control groups are presented in Table 2. Twenty-one elderly healthy control subjects (females, N=13; males, N=8) were examined, with an average age of 73.62 years (SD=8.37) years and a mean MMSE score of 28.67 (SD=1.35).

Results of the voxel-based comparison between the DLB and control group are shown in Figure 1. There were significant cholinergic binding reductions in the DLB compared with the control group in the following areas: the bilateral opercula, anterior to mid-cingulate cortices, bilateral insula, right more than left lateral geniculate nuclei, pulvinar, right proximal optic radiation, bilateral anterior and superior thalami, and bilateral posterior hippocampal fimbria and fornices. Table 3 lists the main clusters and their peak MNI coordinates and associated network hubs. We repeated this analysis with years of education included as a covariate. This analysis yielded similar results (see Figure S1 in the online supplement).

Voxel-based whole brain analysis of VAChT PET identified a distinct topographic cholinergic denervation pattern rather than diffuse cerebral losses in DLB compared with the elderly control group. Regions showing cholinergic denervation overlapped with key hubs of neural networks responsible for visual attention (visual thalamus) (18), salience (insula) (19), spatial navigation (fimbria/fornix) (20), and maintenance of alertness (cingulo-opercular) networks (21). Specifically, we found cholinergic changes in the following hubs of each network: maintenance of alertness (cingulo-opercular) network: insula, operculum, cingulum, thalamus; salience network: anterior insula, anterior cingulum; visual attention network: visual thalamus, including the lateral geniculate nucleus; spatial navigation network: fornix, fimbria, hippocampus, and anterior thalamus.

Graph theory analysis of functional connectivity resting state MRI identified two distinct top-down task-control networks (22, 23). The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and intraparietal sulcus are hubs within the frontoparietal task control (FPTC) network. The FPTC network is important for start-cue and error-related activity and may initiate and adapt control on a more rapid and trial-by-trial basis. The cingulo-opercular task control (COTC) network encompasses medial superior frontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate, frontal operculum, anterior insula, and thalamic regions (22). Effectively, the COTC graph may include parts of both the large-scale distributed cingulo-opercular network and the salience networks (23). The topography of cholinergic reductions in our patients with DLB suggests preferential cholinergic involvement of the COTC. The COTC network controls the goal-directed behavior more on a set maintenance mode using a longer duration time scale, such as needed for maintaining alertness. Clinically, this may be reflected in a lack of maintenance of a functional operative state and difficulties staying on task in persons with DLB in their daily life functions, resulting in cognitive fluctuations. Our findings are also compatible with the emerging notion of an important role of the cingulo-opercular network in task-switching from a passive task to an active task (24).

Another interesting observation was the asymmetry of visual thalamic region findings, such as right more than left lateral geniculate nuclei, pulvinar, and right proximal optic radiation changes. These findings may reflect associations with the ventral attention network, which has a right-hemispheric dominance (25). The ventral attention network is involved in the detection of bottom-up salient and behaviorally relevant stimuli in the environment, especially when the stimuli are initially unattended. This network is highly integrated with the visual system and includes the ventral part of the supramarginal gyrus, ventral frontal cortex, posterior part of the superior temporal sulcus and gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, frontal operculum, and anterior insula, which acts as a “network breaker” that interrupts attention in the dorsal system and reorients attention toward a stimulus-driven object (26). These observations agree with our previous findings that lower cholinergic activity in the thalamus was associated with decreased saliency processing in patients with PD (27). This is likely mediated by the right lateral geniculate nucleus, where decreased cholinergic innervation may be associated with compromised visual attention, perceptual abnormalities, and possibly hallucinations in patients with DLB. We also recently reported on an association between reduced cholinergic integrity of the right lateral geniculate nucleus and falls in patients with PD (28). A similar association may exist in patients with DLB; however, this will require further confirmation.

The hippocampus plays an important role in spatial navigation (20), which is a key function for safely walking. Our findings show evidence of reduced cholinergic transporter binding in the hippocampal fimbria and fornices. Cholinergic deficits in these regions may compromise the integration of cognitive and sensorimotor functions while walking. Clinically, these regional deficits may hypothetically be associated with wandering behavior in the patients with DLB.

Exploratory findings of a voxel-based whole brain regression analysis of the cholinergic PET data, using the MMSE as the outcome parameter, showed several clusters that overlapped with several of the topographic cholinergic denervation regions. A notable finding was involvement of the visual system, especially the bilateral lateral geniculate nuclei and adjacent visual lobe regions. This may possibly be associated with visual processing dependent cognitive and/or neurobehavioral changes in DLB. Other regions showed overlap with the COTC and spatial navigation networks. No clusters meeting this criterion were found for a similar analysis in the normal control group, suggesting disease-specific cognitive correlates in the DLB group. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in a larger sample size.

Identification of neural network changes underlying the clinical symptom manifestations in patients with DLB would augur network neurostimulation approaches as a complementary treatment strategy to existing pharmacological and behavioral interventions. Furthermore, our study has identified hubs of key neural networks that may contribute to the clinical symptom manifestation of DLB. Future studies comparing in vivo imaging findings directly with postmortem data may be very informative to advance our understanding of the neurodegenerative mechanisms underlying DLB. For example, findings of cholinergic changes in the lateral geniculate nucleus in DLB are very novel, but at present there is a critical gap of knowledge to explain the cholinergic vulnerability of the lateral geniculate nucleus in DLB. Another topic of future in vivo-ex vivo correlation research would be to assess for pathological changes in hubs corresponding to regional network vulnerability in postmortem data.

There are several limitations of this study. One limitation is the small sample size. Further studies using a larger sample sizes are needed to validate these topographic VAChT findings and associate them with clinical symptoms. The second limitation is the cross-sectional design, which lacks longitudinal information about the cholinergic binding areas and how cholinergic vesicular transporters may change in relationship to the temporal manifestation of specific clinical symptoms. Third, we do not have detailed neuropsychological testing data to validate the clinical diagnosis of probable DLB. Lastly, our neural network interpretation of the topography of neuroimaging data in the absence of neuropsychological metrics, functional MRI, or electrophysiological measures remains speculative.

Cholinergic changes are not diffuse in DLB but have a topographical distinct pattern of vulnerability that overlaps with hubs of important large-scale functional networks. Therefore, cholinergic network changes may explain some of the disease-defining features of DLB.