Skip to main content
Full access
Articles
Published Online: 31 March 2023

Long-Term Changes in Poststroke Depressive Symptoms: Effects of Functional Disability and Social Support

Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Objective:

Long-term changes in specific depressive symptoms have rarely been studied in stroke patients. Such changes and the effects of social support and functional disability on specific symptoms after a long-term follow-up period (LTP) were investigated.

Methods:

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), ENRICHD Social Support Instrument, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for functional disability were administered at baseline, a 6-month follow-up, and an LTP (35–83 months). Effects of social support and poor functional outcome (mRS score of 3 to 6) on the 10 single items included on the MADRS were identified.

Results:

Among 222 patients, mRS score, total MADRS score, and all single-item scores except “concentration difficulties,” “inability to feel,” and “suicidal thoughts” improved at the 6-month follow-up. From the 6-month follow-up to the LTP, the total MADRS score and half of the single-item scores worsened, although the functional outcome measure continued to improve. In multivariable linear regression tests, low social support was associated with “reduced sleep” (standardized β=0.20; 95% CI=0.06 to 0.34, p=0.005) and “pessimistic thoughts” (standardized β=0.16, 95% CI=0.03 to 0.30, p=0.019), and poor functional outcome was associated with all specific symptoms (standardized β values=0.18–0.43, all p<0.02) except “reduced sleep.”

Conclusions:

Although total MADRS and single-item scores improved in parallel with improvements in functional outcome at the 6-month follow-up, these scores worsened afterward. The lack of social support and presence of functional disability were both associated with total MADRS scores. However, specific symptoms were differentially affected, suggesting that tailored strategies should be applied to manage depression in stroke patients.
Poststroke depression (PSD) is a common psychiatric complication after stroke that negatively affects stroke outcomes (13). The prevalence of PSD has been reported to range from 5% to 66% (4, 5). The variability in these data may result from heterogeneity in stroke subtypes and from differences across studies in follow-up periods, study protocols, and thresholds for the same depression scale (6).
These differences may also be caused by the various methods used to diagnose PSD. Although depression is usually diagnosed by a constellation of symptoms, some specific symptoms (e.g., loss of appetite, insomnia, fatigue, and concentration difficulties) may result from neurological disabilities, brain lesions, or comorbid diseases rather than from true depression in patients with stroke. Thus, there have been arguments regarding whether the diagnostic tools for depression used in psychiatric patients can be applied to patients with stroke (7). Depressive symptoms may also change over time because functional capabilities or the status of the brain may change in stroke patients (5). In addition, because functional disabilities may recover over time, and patients are more likely to be engaged with their previous occupations in the subacute or chronic stage of stroke, functional disabilities and social or familial support may have differential roles at different times (8).
These issues have rarely been investigated, and it remains unclear whether specific depressive symptoms change over time in stroke patients. It also remains unknown whether specific symptoms are particularly affected by social support or functional disability in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term changes in specific depressive symptoms of PSD and to study the effects of functional disabilities and social support on these specific symptoms.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

This is a substudy of our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter EMOTION trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01278498) (9). Briefly, the EMOTION trial enrolled patients older than 20 years with acute ischemic stroke. Patients who had a history of depression prior to the index stroke and those with strong suicidal ideation were excluded, mainly because allocating them to the placebo group was considered unethical. A total of 478 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a group that was administered either escitalopram (10 mg/day) or placebo for 3 months, at which point the treatment was discontinued. In a substudy, we investigated the prevalence and severity of PSD (defined by a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≥8) during a long-term follow-up period (LTP), which ranged from 35 to 83 months (8).
In the current study, we studied the patients who were followed up throughout the LTP. Regardless of the presence of depression, we analyzed changes in 10 depressive symptoms over time as indicated by single-item scores. We also assessed the relationship between social support and functional disability with depressive symptoms reflected in single-item scores on the MADRS. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating hospitals (no. 2017-0215). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Assessments

Information on baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, and clinical variables was obtained from the EMOTION trial. The MADRS, a 10-item questionnaire (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts), was administered to each participant during interviews; each item yields a score from 0 to 6. Because the purpose of the present study was to assess the natural course of depressive symptoms over time, and escitalopram was administered for 3 months in approximately 50% of the patients, we obtained a total score and single-item scores from the MADRS at baseline, at 6 months after stroke, and during the LTP (10, 11). Baseline was defined as the period from stroke symptom onset to 21 days after the index stroke, based on criteria used in the EMOTION trial.
The presence of PSD was defined by a total MADRS score ≥8 (12, 13). Stroke severity and functional outcome were assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), respectively. Poor functional outcome during the LTP was defined as an mRS score of 3 to 6. Moreover, social support was measured with the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument (ESSI) during the LTP; this instrument measures the overall social support for patients with higher scores indicating a greater level of support (14). We defined low social support as a total ESSI score of <19 on five items (in particular, items 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6) and a score of <3 for any two items (8, 15, 16). Data collected from all patients who participated in the follow-up assessments were analyzed regardless of the presence of PSD.

Statistical Analysis

We analyzed the baseline characteristics of the study population. In addition, we investigated the changes in stroke severity (NIHSS score) and functional outcome (mRS score), proportion of participants with PSD, total MADRS score, and scores for each of the 10 single items from baseline across follow-up time points (6 months and the LTP). For comparisons of the follow-up data, we used the Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction for changes in mRS scores, McNemar’s test for changes in the proportion of participants with PSD, and Welch’s one-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis (Games-Howell method for correction) for changes in total and single-item MADRS scores.
Using a simple linear regression model, we analyzed independent risk factors for total MADRS scores during the LTP. Correlations between total MADRS scores during the LTP and other variables were analyzed with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Variables showing significant effects (p<0.05) in the univariate analyses were entered into the multivariable linear regression analysis. Finally, we compared the effects of low social support and poor functional outcome (an mRS score of 3 to 6) during the LTP on the scores for each specific symptom assessed with the MADRS. A two-sided p value of 0.05 was used to define statistical significance. We used R statistical software to perform all analyses (version 4.0.5; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Baseline characteristics and clinical variables for this study population are summarized in Table S1 in the online supplement. Mean age of the patients was 61.9±11.7 years, and 86 (39%) of the patients were women. One hundred twelve patients (50%) were randomly assigned to the escitalopram group.
There were significant improvements in mRS scores (median [interquartile range]) from baseline to the LTP (baseline vs. 6 months vs. LTP: 4.0 [3.0–5.0] vs. 3.0 [2.0–4.0] vs. 1.5 [1.0–3.0], p<0.001) (Table 1). The prevalence of PSD (baseline vs. 6 months, 51% vs. 36%, p=0.002), total MADRS score (mean±SD) (baseline vs. 6 months: 9.3±8.0 vs. 6.2±6.2, p<0.001), and all single-item scores, except “concentration difficulties,” “inability to feel,” and “suicidal thoughts,” significantly decreased from baseline to 6 months (Table 1).
TABLE 1. Functional outcome, poststroke depression, and depressive symptom severity at baseline, at 6-month follow-up, and during the long-term follow-up perioda
 Baseline6 monthsLTPpbpcpd
VariableMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
mRS score (median, interquartile range)4.03.0–5.03.02.0–4.01.51.5–3.0<0.001<0.001<0.001
PSD (N, %)11351793699450.0020.0220.141
MADRS score (total)9.38.06.26.28.78.7<0.0010.0020.703
 Apparent sadness1.31.10.81.00.71.2<0.0010.514<0.001
 Reported sadness1.21.20.81.01.01.3<0.0010.0950.314
 Inner tension1.01.10.81.00.91.10.0500.4840.517
 Reduced sleep1.11.50.61.10.91.4<0.0010.0220.388
 Reduced appetite0.91.20.61.00.71.30.0030.3930.191
 Concentration difficulties0.91.10.71.01.01.50.2670.0440.516
 Lassitude1.11.60.71.11.11.50.0030.0070.948
 Inability to feel0.50.90.40.71.11.40.114<0.001<0.001
 Pessimistic thoughts0.70.90.50.80.81.30.0190.0030.498
 Suicidal thoughts0.50.90.40.70.51.10.1340.4220.919
a
LTP=long-term follow-up period; MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mRS=modified Rankin Scale; PSD=poststroke depression.
b
p value between the baseline and 6-month follow-up periods.
c
p value between the 6-month follow-up period and the LTP.
d
p value between the baseline period and the LTP.
However, the prevalence of PSD (6 months vs. LTP, 36% vs. 45%, p=0.022), total MADRS score (6 months vs. LTP, 6.2±6.2 vs. 8.7±8.7, p=0.002), and single-item scores, including “reduced sleep,” “concentration difficulties,” “lassitude,” “inability to feel,” and “pessimistic thoughts,” increased from 6 months to the LTP. The other specific items, including “apparent sadness,” “reported sadness,” “inner tension,” “reduced appetite,” and “suicidal thoughts,” did not worsen from the 6-month poststroke follow-up assessment to the LTP assessment (Table 1).
We then investigated the relationships between demographic characteristics, risk factors, and clinical variables obtained at baseline and the LTP and the total MADRS scores at the LTP in simple linear regression analyses (Table 2). Variables with significant effects (p<0.05) included age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, baseline NIHSS and MADRS scores, antidepressant use, recurrent stroke, mRS score, and low social support at the LTP. A multiple linear regression analysis performed after we adjusted for baseline demographic characteristics (age and sex) and statistically significant factors (p<0.05), including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, baseline NIHSS score, baseline MADRS score, antidepressant use, regular clinic visit, recurrent stroke, low social support, and poor functional outcome, showed that there were differential effects of low social support and poor functional outcome on each specific symptom item (Table 3). Both low social support (standardized β coefficient=0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.06 to 0.29, standard error [SE]=1.09, t=2.91, p=0.004) and poor functional outcome (standardized β=0.41, 95% CI=0.28 to 0.54, SE=1.28, t=6.20, p<0.001) were significantly associated with the total MADRS score during the LTP. Poor functional outcome was associated with all single-item scores (standardized β values=0.18–0.43, all p<0.02) except “reduced sleep.” In contrast, low social support was significantly associated with “reduced sleep” (standardized β=0.20, 95% CI=0.06 to 0.34, SE=0.20, t=2.81, p=0.005) and “pessimistic thoughts” (standardized β=0.16, 95% CI=0.03 to 0.30, SE=0.19, t=2.36, p=0.019) but not with the other items.
TABLE 2. Simple regression to test associations with total MADRS scores at the long-term follow-upa
Variableβ95% CIStandardized β95% CIp
Age0.150.06, 0.250.210.08, 0.340.002
Female sex1.35−1.01, 3.720.08−0.06, 0.210.261
Use of escitalopram1.13−1.17, 3.440.07−0.07, 0.200.334
Hypertension3.020.37, 5.660.150.02, 0.280.026
Diabetes1.32−1.01, 3.660.08−0.06, 0.210.265
Hyperlipidemia3.381.12, 5.650.190.06, 0.330.004
Coronary artery disease0.09−3.08, 3.250.00−0.13, 0.140.958
Smoking−0.50−2.81, 1.81−0.03−0.16, 0.100.668
Baseline data     
 NIHSS score0.770.38, 1.170.250.12, 0.38<0.001
 MADRS score0.270.13, 0.410.250.12, 0.37<0.001
Long-term follow-up data     
 Antidepressant use8.104.79, 11.410.310.18, 0.44<0.001
 Recurrent stroke6.250.45, 12.050.140.01, 0.270.035
 mRS score3.522.82, 4.220.560.44, 0.67<0.001
 Low social support5.072.75, 7.400.280.15, 0.41<0.001
a
MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; mRS=modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS=National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
TABLE 3. Adjusted linear regression to test associations of low social support and poor functional outcome with MADRS single-item scores during long-term follow-upa
 Low social supportPoor functional outcome
OutcomeStandardized β95% CIpStandardized β95% CIp
Total MADRS score0.170.06, 0.290.0040.410.28, 0.54<0.001
MADRS item scores      
 Apparent sadness0.12−0.01, 0.260.0790.200.05, 0.350.011
 Reported sadness0.11−0.02, 0.250.1240.260.11, 0.410.001
 Inner tension0.12−0.02, 0.250.1060.300.15, 0.44<0.001
 Reduced sleep0.200.06, 0.340.0050.06−0.09, 0.220.429
 Reduced appetite0.13−0.01, 0.260.0620.370.23, 0.52<0.001
 Concentration difficulties0.08−0.05, 0.220.2220.180.03, 0.320.020
 Lassitude0.11−0.02, 0.240.0960.380.23, 0.52<0.001
 Inability to feel0.02−0.11, 0.150.7460.430.29, 0.57<0.001
 Pessimistic thoughts0.160.03, 0.300.0190.280.13, 0.43<0.001
 Suicidal thoughts0.11−0.03, 0.250.1260.240.08, 0.390.003
a
MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. The multivariable linear regression analysis for continuous variables (total MADRS score and single-item scores) was adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, baseline MADRS score, antidepressant use, regular clinic visit, recurrent stroke, low social support, and poor functional outcome assessed at the long-term follow-up period.

Discussion

This study showed that the prevalence of PSD, total MADRS score, and mRS score decreased over time up to 6 months after a stroke. However, although the mRS score continued to decrease, the prevalence of PSD and the total MADRS score increased after 6 months.
This study is the first to analyze changes in specific depressive symptoms over time in patients with stroke. Our data on suicidal ideation are not reliable because patients with high scores on the suicidal thoughts scale were excluded from the main EMOTION study, a placebo-controlled trial, for ethical reasons; thus, these data will not be discussed here. We found that all the specific symptoms, except for “concentration difficulties” and “inability to feel,” improved from the baseline assessment to the 6-month poststroke assessment. Moreover, the symptoms “reduced sleep,” “concentration difficulties,” “lassitude,” “inability to feel,” and “pessimistic thoughts” were exacerbated between the 6-month poststroke period to the LTP.
Neurological or functional disability is one of the most important determinants of PSD (1, 17). Interestingly, although mRS scores continuously improved over time, the total MADRS score and the single-item scores for specific symptoms worsened during the LTP in our study. There are several possible reasons for this observation. First, even if neurological deficits had improved, functional deficits still remained in these patients; the median mRS score during the LTP was 1.5. Thus, although the deficits became milder after the 6-month poststroke time point, long-lasting functional deficits may have produced an accumulation of negative psychological problems that were exacerbated when patients reengaged in their social occupation during the chronic stage of stroke. Second, the worsening of certain specific symptoms such as “concentration difficulties,” “inability to feel,” and “lassitude” may be attributed to changing brain status rather than psychiatric problems (7). A previous study reported that the rate of apathy after stroke increased steadily over 5 years (18), possibly associated with increasing brain vascular pathology over time. Because of the similarity between “apathy” and “concentration difficulties” or “inability to feel,” exacerbation of these symptoms may reflect neurological rather than psychiatric problems. This theory may explain why scores for items such as “concentration difficulties” and “inability to feel” did not improve from the baseline to the 6-month poststroke period. Unfortunately, this issue was not systematically explored with follow-up brain imaging in our study.
In addition, one of these symptoms, the item “lassitude,” may be a manifestation of “fatigue” rather than depression, and fatigue is quite common in patients with stroke. One study showed that approximately one-third of stroke patients experienced fatigue in the acute and subacute stages; the prevalence remained similar at 18 months after stroke (19). Another study showed that although stroke characteristics were associated with fatigue in the acute and subacute stages, fatigue in the chronic stage was more closely associated with medical comorbidities, such as arthritis and obstructive sleep apnea (20). Regardless of the explanation, our observation raises questions about the use of diagnostic tools for depression in stroke patients that contain items that may not reflect true depressive symptoms. Further studies are needed to determine whether these items should be excluded from diagnostic tools used to assess depression in patients with stroke.
Only a few studies have examined the long-term course of PSD. Our results are consistent with those of a previous study demonstrating that the prevalence of PSD decreased up to 12 months but increased after 3 years (21). In contrast, the South London Stroke Register (SLSR) study showed that the prevalence of PSD did not increase until 5 years poststroke (22). These differing results may be due to the different tools used in these studies. In the former study, PSD was defined according to DSM-III criteria for major depression, which includes items such as “poor appetite,” “insomnia,” “psychomotor agitation,” “loss of interest,” “fatigue,” and “diminished ability to think or concentrate.” These items, which may not represent pure depressive symptoms, are included in the MADRS, which was used in our study. In contrast, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale used in the SLSR study did not include common somatic symptoms such as fatigue and insomnia (23). This observation suggests that the assessment of the prevalence of PSD in the chronic stage of stroke may differ according to whether the diagnostic tools employed contain items that may be influenced by neurological deficits or changing brain status.
We found that a low level of social support and poor functional outcome were each independently associated with the total MADRS score during the LTP. However, their effects on single-item scores were significantly different. Poor functional outcome was associated with each of the specific symptoms except for “reduced sleep.” In contrast, low social support was associated with “reduced sleep” and “pessimistic thoughts.” Sleep disturbances are known to be associated with social support (24, 25). The amount of support received by a patient is associated with increased satisfaction, an increased sense of meaning in life, and decreased depressive symptoms, which in turn are associated with the likelihood of sleeping soundly (26). Social support may also promote the expression of positive emotions and trust from others through social networks (27, 28).
In contrast, poor functional outcome was not associated with “reduced sleep.” It is known that sleep disturbances and depression are bidirectionally related. Considering the close relationship between depression and sleep, one possible hypothesis is that “reduced sleep” is a pure depressive or psychiatric symptom in stroke patients during the LTP. Previous national population studies have suggested that having lower income, being divorced or separated, and having no health insurance are associated with insomnia (29, 30). Interestingly, these factors are all within the category of social support. Therefore, “reduced sleep” may be a pure depressive symptom associated mainly with low social support rather than a symptom related to physical disability or brain lesions.
This study has several limitations. First, health care systems are different in different countries; generalizing the results of this study may be difficult because only Korean patients were included. Second, since we examined social support only once during the LTP, its impact on patients’ mood before the LTP remains unknown. Third, in the main EMOTION trial, we excluded patients with a previous history of depression and those with strong suicidal ideation. Moreover, approximately one-third of patients did not participate in the current study, and the nonparticipants were older and had higher initial MADRS and NIHSS scores than those who did participate. Thus, the prevalence and severity of PSD may have been underestimated in our study. This is an inherent problem in depression research; patients with depression are difficult to include in the placebo group and are hesitant to participate in clinical trials (31). However, these factors are unlikely to have influenced our main conclusion because the purpose of the current study was to elucidate the changes in single-item scores for specific depression-related symptoms and to identify associated factors in patients with stroke, rather than to assess the exact prevalence of PSD.

Conclusions

Despite the above limitations, our study showed long-term changes in specific depressive symptoms in context of PSD. Our results have several clinical implications. Physicians need to be aware of the increased prevalence of PSD during the LTP. Although most specific symptoms are associated with functional disabilities, a lack of social support was associated with “reduced sleep” and “pessimistic thoughts.” Therefore, tailored strategies to manage PSD according to each patient’s symptoms need to be developed. In addition, future studies are needed to elucidate the appropriate tools to measure depression in stroke patients.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.neuropsych.20220134.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
Robinson RG, Jorge RE: Post-stroke depression: a review. Am J Psychiatry 2016; 173:221–231
2.
Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S: Poststroke depression and emotional incontinence: correlation with lesion location. Neurology 2000; 54:1805–1810
3.
Parikh RM, Robinson RG, Lipsey JR, et al: The impact of poststroke depression on recovery in activities of daily living over a 2-year follow-up. Arch Neurol 1990; 47:785–789
4.
Kutlubaev MA, Hackett ML: Part II: predictors of depression after stroke and impact of depression on stroke outcome: an updated systematic review of observational studies. Int J Stroke 2014; 9:1026–1036
5.
Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Wolfe CDA, et al: Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202:14–21
6.
Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N, et al: Poststroke depression: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2017; 48:e30–e43
7.
de Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Lindeman E, et al: Clinical manifestation of depression after stroke: is it different from depression in other patient populations? PLoS One 2015; 10:e0144450
8.
Kwon B, Lee EJ, Park S, et al: Long-term changes in post-stroke depression, emotional incontinence, and anger. J Stroke 2021; 23:263–272
9.
Kim JS, Lee EJ, Chang DI, et al: Efficacy of early administration of escitalopram on depressive and emotional symptoms and neurological dysfunction after stroke: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4:33–41
10.
Montgomery SA, Asberg M: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134:382–389
11.
Kearns NP, Cruickshank CA, McGuigan KJ, et al: A comparison of depression rating scales. Br J Psychiatry 1982; 141:45–49
12.
Kang HJ, Stewart R, Kim JM, et al: Comparative validity of depression assessment scales for screening poststroke depression. J Affect Disord 2013; 147:186–191
13.
Lee EJ, Kim JS, Chang DI, et al: Differences in therapeutic responses and factors affecting post-stroke depression at a later stage according to baseline depression. J Stroke 2018; 20:258–267
14.
Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD): study design and methods. Am Heart J 2000; 139:1–9
15.
Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD): baseline characteristics. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:316–322
16.
Mitchell PH, Powell L, Blumenthal J, et al: A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003; 23:398–403
17.
Kim JS: Post-stroke mood and emotional disturbances: pharmacological therapy based on mechanisms. J Stroke 2016; 18:244–255
18.
Brodaty H, Liu Z, Withall A, et al: The longitudinal course of post-stroke apathy over five years. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2013; 25:283–291
19.
Snaphaan L, van der Werf S, de Leeuw FE: Time course and risk factors of post-stroke fatigue: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18:611–617
20.
Chen K, Marsh EB: Chronic post-stroke fatigue: it may no longer be about the stroke itself. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 174:192–197
21.
Aström M, Adolfsson R, Asplund K: Major depression in stroke patients: a 3-year longitudinal study. Stroke 1993; 24:976–982
22.
Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Rudd AG, et al: Natural history, predictors, and associations of depression 5 years after stroke: the South London Stroke Register. Stroke 2011; 42:1907–1911
23.
Coyne JC, van Sonderen E: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is dead, but like Elvis, there will still be citings. J Psycho Res 2012; 73:77–78
24.
Kent de Grey RG, Uchino BN, Trettevik R, et al: Social support and sleep: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 2018; 37:787–798
25.
Stafford M, Bendayan R, Tymoszuk U, et al: Social support from the closest person and sleep quality in later life: evidence from a British birth cohort study. J Psychosom Res 2017; 98:1–9
26.
Krause N, Rainville G: Exploring the relationship between social support and sleep. Health Educ Behav 2020; 47:153–161
27.
Schaefer C, Coyne JC, Lazarus RS: The health-related functions of social support. J Behav Med 1981; 4:381–406
28.
Kim BJ, Kihl T: Suicidal ideation associated with depression and social support: a survey-based analysis of older adults in South Korea. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:409
29.
Talala KM, Martelin TP, Haukkala AH, et al: Socio-economic differences in self-reported insomnia and stress in Finland from 1979 to 2002: a population-based repeated cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2012; 12:650
30.
Grandner MA, Petrov MER, Rattanaumpawan P, et al: Sleep symptoms, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic position. J Clin Sleep Med 2013; 9:897–905
31.
Leykin Y, Dunn LB, Muñoz RF: The effect of depression on the decision to join a clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2017; 85:751–756

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Pages: 244 - 249
PubMed: 36999251

History

Received: 11 July 2022
Accepted: 27 November 2022
Published online: 31 March 2023
Published in print: Summer 2023

Keywords

  1. Depression
  2. Social support
  3. Functional outcome
  4. Functional disability
  5. Stroke and other cerebral vascular disease (neuropsychiatric aspects)

Authors

Details

Jae-Chan Ryu, M.D.
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Ryu); Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea (Kim).
Jong S. Kim, M.D., Ph.D. [email protected]
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Ryu); Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea (Kim).
on behalf of EMOTION investigators
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Ryu); Department of Neurology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea (Kim).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Kim ([email protected]).

Competing Interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share