Skip to main content
Full access
Legal News
Published Online: 10 June 2016

Justice Breyer Gives Insider’s Peek Inside the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court justice gives a lively and colorful description of the inner workings of the highest court in the land.
“You have to know something about what goes on beyond our shores in order to answer certain questions of law here in the United States,” said U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer last month at APA’s 2016 Annual Meeting in Atlanta. “If you don’t know at least something about international law, the answer to a question of law here will not be fully informed. And the number of those kinds of cases is growing.” 
Justice Stephen Breyer describes a remarkably orderly process by which the Supreme Court deliberates on cases ranging from the mundane to the momentous.
David Hathcox
Breyer was speaking about his latest book, The Court and the World: American Law and the New Global Realities. His comments on the book were in response to a question from friend and past APA President Alan Stone, M.D., who was instrumental in bringing Breyer to the APA meeting.
But the bulk of Breyer’s comments gave a lively, engaging, and impromptu—and frequently funny—description of the work-a-day life of the highest court in the land. “People have arguments, some people don’t get over their arguments, they go to lawyers who are supposed to help people get over their arguments—that’s called ‘settling out of court.’ When they can’t settle, they wind up in a courtroom.”
From there, court decisions can be appealed—many times—through district and circuit courts, state supreme courts, or federal appeals courts until they come to the Supreme Court. Some 7,000 to 8,000 cases a year request hearings before the Supreme Court, and only some 80 cases are heard.
“The criterion for whether cases get heard by the court is whether there is a division of opinion in the lower courts,” Breyer said. That is, the court primarily takes cases to resolve a conflict among the lower courts on important questions of federal law.
He described a remarkably orderly process by which the justices read, debate, and eventually decide cases—many of them mundane and unremarkable, and many others momentous in their consequences. He quoted Justice Anthony Kennedy as telling Breyer when he joined the court, “It’s much more like an express train than you have ever imagined.”
Breyer, who was appointed to the court by President Bill Clinton in 1994, is known for his pragmatic approach to constitutional law. Introducing Breyer before his remarks, outgoing APA President Renée Binder, M.D., called Breyer a “champion of the Constitution as a ‘living document’ that needs to take into account contemporary issues.”
Breyer said the relationship among the justices—despite abiding differences in outlooks on law and the Constitution—are without rancor. “I have never heard a raised voice or a derisive comment from anyone about another justice,” Breyer said. “We have lunch together, sometimes we play bridge together. It’s not ‘slap on the back, let’s go to the bar,’ but it’s cordial, respectful, and professional.” 
Breyer said the orderliness of the court, along with its processes, is one of the great achievements of the United States. He noted that some highly controversial decisions by the court may have had large segments of the population angry or even furious (he cited, for instance, the 2000 case in which the court’s decision effectively decided the contested 2000 presidential election). 
“Sometimes you may hear a decision and wish there were riots in the streets,” Breyer said. “But before you wish that, I’d ask you to turn on your television set and see what happens in other countries where questions of law are not decided as we do. That is a treasure of the United States—that we do decide our differences of opinion about questions of the law, under the law. That’s a very, very good thing, and it works very well.” ■

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 10 June 2016
Published in print: June 4, 2016 – June 17, 2016

Keywords

  1. Justice Stephen Breyer
  2. United States Supreme Court
  3. APA 2016 Annual Meeting
  4. Atlanta, Ga.

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share