Skip to main content
Full access
Viewpoints
Published Online: 24 June 2022

Because We Are Health Professionals

Recent months have brought more anguish to this country. We have lost good and generous neighbors shopping for groceries in Buffalo. Teachers and young children celebrating the end of a school year in Uvalde, Texas, have been laid to rest. Again, we bear witness to the senseless, heartbreaking, infuriating impact of the tyranny of inaction. And as usual, the largest impact has fallen upon the communities, people, and children who have been systematically disinvested and disenfranchised.
For the first time, injuries related to firearms have become the leading cause of death among children in the United States, surpassing motor vehicle accidents, according to the May 19 New England Journal of Medicine. How is it possible that firearms deaths continue to rise while motor vehicle deaths continue to fall?
The answer seems straightforward. Motor vehicle safety has long been understood as a pragmatic issue of public health; through that framework, we have made enormous strides. Gun safety has been mired in politics and culture wars; through that entanglement, we reap continued heartache.
We need to reframe the dialogue. Preventing gun violence cannot continue to be a political issue, a cultural issue, or even a constitutional issue. It is a public health issue like smoking cessation, fire safety, seatbelts, and car seats. Gun violence lies directly within “our lane,” not because we are mental health professionals but because we are health professionals.
Like many of you, it nauseates us when gun violence is blamed on mental illness. We know greater resources are needed for mental health screening, treatment, and research—though gun violence is far from the leading reason these resources are badly needed. It is hard to imagine a psychologically balanced individual discharging a lethal weapon into an innocent victim—though people with diagnosed mental illness are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.
It sickens us when the narrative around mental health and gun violence focuses on a “deranged individual,” while other factors including unfettered legal access to firearms, racism, educational disinvestment, and poverty go unaddressed. It sickens us that those who lament mental illness as the primary culprit after mass shootings often fail to support legislation or spending on mental health. Moreover, as Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut cogently stated, “Spare me the BS about mental illness. … We don’t have any more mental illness than any other country in the world. … We’re an outlier when it comes to access to firearms and the ability of criminals and very sick people to get their arms on firearms. That’s what makes America different.”
To prevent future gun violence, people like ourselves and our professional societies must play an increasingly vocal role in the local and national dialogue—through education of patients, trainees, and clinicians; community outreach; and research to inform public policy.
Health care workers represent a broad range of cultural, political, and geographic perspectives and are trusted voices in society. Our duty is to advance the health and well-being of the communities we serve. Reducing gun violence through evidence-informed interventions and expert advocacy is surely integral to this mission. It is hard to conceive of goals less polarizing and more consistent with our purpose and values than preventing trauma and premature death. As Esther Choo, an emergency medicine physician in Oregon, wrote in a tweet reported by NPR, “We are not anti-gun. We are anti-bullet holes in our patients.”
In these times of sadness and trauma, we are encouraged to see the health care community increasingly embracing this issue as within our lane and our responsibility. To safeguard the well-being of communities across the United States, we must come together and lead, not as a monolithic political force but as diverse individuals who join forces on behalf of public health. ■

Resources

If you would like to explore further, here are a few illuminating articles on gun violence research and training:

Biographies

Jonathan E. Alpert, M.D., Ph.D., is the Dorothy and Marty Silverman University Chair of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. He is also the chair of APA’s Council on Research. Henry Chung, M.D., is a professor of psychiatry at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the former chair of APA’s Integrated Care Committee.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 24 June 2022
Published in print: August 1, 2022 – August 31, 2022

Keywords

  1. Jonathan Alpert
  2. Henry Chung
  3. gun violence
  4. mass shootings
  5. mental health and gun violence

Authors

Affiliations

Jonathan E. Alpert, M.D., Ph.D.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share