Skip to main content
Full access
Community
Published Online: 24 September 2024

Patient Advocacy Groups Demand Significant Changes to Clozapine REMS

APA has joined with The Angry Moms, Team Daniel Running for Recovery, and other professional and patient groups in calling for a reconsideration of the clozapine REMS at a meeting to be held with the FDA next month.
“My wife and I have a son who has been doing well since being on clozapine. The blood draw requirement should be eliminated. A delay in his blood being tested resulted in him having a psychotic episode requiring him to be hospitalized. Prior to this episode he had been living successfully in a group home and had been enrolled in college classes.”
“I was hospitalized from July 5 to July 10 because of a REMS snafu...; after almost three days without the clozapine, I lapsed into catatonia. I desperately need a new provider; however, no one else in the region will even touch clozapine (I’ve been to four different clinics).”
—Excerpts from “Negligence of the Week,” a regular feature in the newsletter of The Angry Moms
Rachel Streiff is legal guardian for an adult woman who has been prescribed the antipsychotic clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and—like the patients who rely on clozapine and their parents and caretakers featured in the vignettes above—she is furious.
“She has had her clozapine interrupted multiple times with tragic consequences—prolonged hospitalizations, symptoms of cholinergic rebound, and severe setbacks to her recovery,” Streiff told Psychiatric News. “If you’re prescribed clozapine, your life depends on it. Even 24 hours without the drug will have significant consequences.”
Streiff is a leader and founding member of The Angry Moms, a coalition of hundreds of parents and patient advocates who are … well … angry. They say treatment interruptions have in every case been the result of a cautionary protocol imposed on the prescription of clozapine by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS. A total of 73 drugs approved by the FDA are accompanied by a REMS because of health risks that are deemed serious enough to merit a higher degree of oversight and monitoring by prescribers and dispensing pharmacists.
The FDA requires the Clozapine REMS to manage the risk of severe neutropenia—known as agranulocytosis—associated with clozapine treatment. Originally instituted in September 2015, the REMS actually stems from a blood-monitoring requirement imposed by the drug’s manufacturers as a condition of its approval 30 years ago in 1990 (see “‘Godfather of Clozapine’ Calls for End to REMS,” p. 21). The REMS applies to all clozapine medicines on the market and comes with a set of requirements known as “elements to assure safe use” (ETASU) that include lifetime regular blood monitoring of patients and the use of a centralized system in which prescribers and pharmacists are mandated to report blood monitoring.
Streiff noted that there is no official database for recording the kind of bad outcomes (reported in The Angry Moms’ “Negligence of the Week”) that stem from treatment disruptions caused by REMS. She added that when those disruptions do occur, it is potentially dangerous for caregivers and the surrounding community, as well as for the patient.
Of the woman for whom she is guardian, Streiff said: “She has never missed a blood test, never had a low value. She is not at risk for agranulocytosis from clozapine. There is absolutely no reason why her treatment has been interrupted the way it has.”

‘An Ongoing Tragedy’

Prescribers, pharmacists, and countless patients and caregivers, like Streiff, say the REMS has been a source of trouble resulting in delays in patients receiving a medication that is regarded as the most effective for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Moreover, recent research has confirmed what a handful of clinicians have long argued—that the risk of agranulocytosis is significantly overestimated, is highest immediately after initiation of clozapine, and drops dramatically after the first six months.
Team Daniel Running for Recovery, a precursor to The Angry Moms, was founded by New York City internist Robert Laitman, M.D., whose son Daniel has schizophrenia. Team Daniel advocates for and supports people living with mental illness by organizing events to bring them and their families and friends together for social support and exercise and to help them negotiate the health care system to find the best treatments available.
Apart from the interruptions in care that the clozapine REMS often causes, Laitman said, a more fundamental problem is that few clinicians prescribe the drug to begin with. Years of publicity about blood-monitoring requirements and the risk of neutropenia have convinced many prescribers that it is too much work, too much hassle, and too risky.
“We hear story after story of the tragedies that are occurring because of REMS, because people cannot get their clozapine in a timely way, or because prescribers are refusing to put people on clozapine,” Laitman said. “The average time to get on clozapine is over five years after people have failed other drugs. It’s an ongoing tragedy.”
Laitman echoes many clinicians familiar with the data about clozapine who say the risk of neutropenia is significantly exaggerated and that it has obscured education about other more legitimate risks associated with the drug—weight gain, hypersalivation, sedation, potential cardiac complications—that can be managed relatively easily without a cumbersome central registry.
Anger about the clozapine REMS may be coming to a head. In a July letter to the FDA in advance of a meeting in November about the REMS, APA joined Team Daniel, The Angry Moms, and 10 other professional and patient advocacy groups in calling for a reconsideration.
“Although well intended, the REMS process is now operating as a barrier to clozapine access and use by patients,” the letter stated. “The Clozapine REMS is causing substantial challenges to pharmacists and prescribing clinicians who are seeking to provide their patients with the clinical benefits of clozapine while struggling to adhere to hematologic monitoring and reporting mandates.”

Converting to an Educational REMS

Prescribers who work with patients with schizophrenia say groups like The Angry Moms and Team Daniel have fought the good fight. “The Angry Moms have every right to be angry,” said Robert Cotes, M.D., professor of psychiatry at Emory University and director of the clinical and research program for psychosis at Grady Health System.
“I applaud this group for systematically pointing out the problems that patients have obtaining clozapine because of the REMS, and that when there is an interruption in treatment, there can be really catastrophic outcomes for our patients. And they have made it clear that the REMS itself is a deterrent to many people receiving clozapine in the first place.”
Cotes said the kinds of problems highlighted by The Angry Moms in their “Negligence of the Week” are seen by prescribers of clozapine all the time. But he remains hopeful that the FDA may make significant modifications to the REMS system. “That’s in large part because of the strength of the different patient advocacy and professional organizations working together to highlight the problems with the system,” Cotes said, “and how much potential harm this causes to patients who aren’t getting clozapine in a timely way.”
Cotes and Laitman both say the REMS ETASU should be scrapped in favor of an educational REMS on a central website. “Prescribers and patients would have access to the broader safety concerns about clozapine, not just the narrow focus on neutropenia,” Cotes said. “I think prescribers can do the blood monitoring without the central registry requirement. There are also restrictions on pharmacies that impact getting clozapine to patients that I hope would be removed.”
Meanwhile, prescribers and caregivers agree that when patients who need clozapine have reliably continuous treatment, it is often transformative. Laitman’s son Daniel lives independently in New York, has a steady girlfriend, and works as a stand-up comedian. Streiff’s ward is an accomplished artist.
Streiff asked: “How has this dangerous barrier to the best treatment for schizophrenia been allowed to persist?” ■

Resources

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share