Skip to main content
Open access
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Published Online: 16 December 2020

Identifying Bereavement‐Related Markers of Mental and Behavioral Health Problems Among Clinic‐Referred Adolescents

Publication: Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Objective

This study examined bereavement‐related risk markers (number of deaths, cause of death, and relationship to deceased) of mental and behavioral health problems (suicidal thoughts or behaviors, self‐injury, depression, posttraumatic stress, and substance use) in a national sample of clinic‐referred bereaved adolescents.

Method

Participants included 1281 bereaved youth aged 12–21 years (M=15, SD=1.8; 62.1% female), from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network Core Data Set.

Results

Generalized linear mixed‐effects regression models controlling for demographics and other traumas revealed that youth bereaved by multiple deaths had higher posttraumatic stress scores than youth bereaved by a single death (Estimated difference ±SE=3.36 ± 1.11, p=0.003). Youth bereaved by suicide were more likely to report experiencing suicidal thoughts or behaviors (AOR=1.68, p=0.049) and alcohol use (AOR=2.33, p<0.001) than youth bereaved by natural causes. Youth bereaved by homicide were at greater risk for substance use than youth bereaved by natural death (AOR=1.76, p=0.02). Compared to parentally bereaved youth, youth who lost a peer were more likely to use alcohol (AOR=2.32, p=0.02) or other substances (AOR=2.41, p=0.01); in contrast, parentally bereaved youth were more likely to experience depression compared to those who experienced the death of an adult relative or unrelated adult (range of AOR: 0.40 to 0.64, p‐values<0.05).

Conclusion

These bereavement‐related contextual factors can serve as early markers of mental and behavioral health problems among bereaved youth.

HIGHLIGHTS

Few studies have examined bereavement‐related risk markers of mental and behavioral health problems among treatment‐seeking adolescents.
Number of prior traumas, number of prior losses, experiencing a death due to suicide or homicide, and experiencing the death of a parent (as opposed to another relative or friend) were each associated with higher levels of mental and behavioral health problems among bereaved adolescents.
Findings have implications for early identification of bereaved youth who may be in need of intervention.
Traumatic life events have been identified as markers of risk for a wide range of mental and behavioral health problems in adolescents, including anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, substance use, and suicide risk (1, 2). Notwithstanding the significant links found between adverse life events and youth mental and behavioral health problems, few studies have “unpacked” major life adversities to explore various experiences that may be differentially associated with these problem outcomes. There are three reasons why bereavement may be especially important to explore as a potential risk marker (a variable that is quantitatively associated with a specific outcome, but its direct alteration does not necessarily alter the likelihood of the outcome (3)) for adolescent mental and behavioral health problems. First, the death of a close person is one of the most frequently reported traumatic events in population‐based adult (4) and youth samples (5). Second, bereavement is most likely to be identified as the most distressing life event above and beyond other types of traumas (5). Third, interpersonal losses, including bereavement, are the most commonly identified environmental precipitants for adolescent suicidal behavior (6).
There is a pressing need for developmentally informed conceptual frameworks and research designs that clarify how bereavement‐related contextual factors can differ in their predictive potencies, operate through different pathways of influence, and contribute to different psychiatric sequelae (7). Although recent studies have examined the role of childhood bereavement in predicting psychiatric problems in adulthood 4, 8, no studies have yet explored bereavement‐related contextual factors as potential early risk markers of mental and behavioral health problems among clinic‐referred bereaved adolescents, above and beyond other forms of trauma.

Candidate Bereavement‐Related Indicators of Mental and Behavioral Health Problems

The childhood bereavement field is currently in a nascent phase, as evidenced by its limited capacity to differentiate between adaptive versus maladaptive responses to loss and to identify reliable predictors of adaptive and maladaptive responses in bereaved children and adolescents (9). Nevertheless, recent evidence points to the value of exploring whether bereavement‐related contextual variables could serve as early risk markers of mental and behavioral health problems among bereaved youth.

Number of Deaths

A series of retrospective studies of adults, referred to as the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) studies (10), consistently report dose‐response relations between number of childhood adversities and mental, behavioral, and physical health problems in adulthood, including depression (11), alcohol‐related disorders (12), anxiety (13), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (11), and suicide attempts (14). To date, no studies have explicitly investigated dose‐response relations between total number of deaths experienced and mental and behavioral health problems in adolescents. A recent epidemiological study of adults found a dose‐response relation between number of unexpected deaths experienced and number of lifetime psychiatric disorders (4). Layne et al. (15) extended these findings by identifying links between cumulative exposure to trauma and loss during childhood and high‐risk behavior—including suicidal thoughts/behaviors—in a national sample of clinic‐referred adolescents. Together, these findings raise the question of whether a similar dose‐response relation exists between number of deaths experienced and mental and behavioral health problems among bereaved youth.

Circumstances of the Death

The few adult studies to evaluate cause of death in relation to mental health outcomes report significantly higher rates of psychological distress among adults bereaved by violent or sudden deaths than by foreseeable deaths (16). Recent studies of adults bereaved in childhood found a higher likelihood of suicide risk among individuals bereaved by suicide than by accidental deaths or other causes (8). Among adolescents, bereavement by suicide or homicide may confer a higher risk for mental and behavioral health problems than bereavement by anticipated deaths due to such factors as the often‐traumatogenic, stigmatized, and public nature of suicide‐ and homicide‐related deaths (16); contagion effects (17); and in the case of suicide, shared familial and biological risks (16).

Relationship to the Deceased

With few exceptions (5), most studies of bereaved youth have focused on one type of loss (e.g., parental bereavement) and have not examined potential differences in response to the death as a function of relationship to the deceased. Using an epidemiological sample, Kaplow et al. (5) found that parentally bereaved youth were more likely to exhibit substance abuse and impaired functioning than youth bereaved by the death of a grandparent or other relative. However, a study of adults bereaved as children found a similar effect of suicide bereavement regardless of the degree of blood relation (16). Given the central importance of the parent–child relationship, parentally bereaved youth may be at greater risk for mental and behavioral health problems than youth bereaved by the deaths of other relatives or friends.
Collectively, these studies underscore the possible utility of examining bereavement‐related contextual factors in relation to specific mental and behavioral health problems. In addition, few studies have controlled for exposure to other types of trauma despite evidence that bereavement commonly co‐occurs with other trauma types (18), and that other forms of trauma independently increase risk for psychiatric symptoms (5).

Study Aims

This study drew upon both previously identified predictors of adolescent mental health issues in the context of bereavement 5, 16 and recent theory‐building studies of risk and resilience in bereaved youth 7, 9, 19 to evaluate whether bereavement‐related contextual variables may be associated with mental and behavioral health problems in bereaved adolescents above and beyond the effects of other traumas. We examined potential associations between three variables (number of deaths, cause of death, and relationship to the deceased) and various mental and behavioral health problems (suicidal thoughts or behaviors, non‐suicidal self injury, depression symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, alcohol use, and substance use), while controlling for other forms of trauma, in a national clinic‐referred sample of bereaved youth (20). We hypothesized that the likelihood of experiencing mental and behavioral health problems would increase as a function of total deaths (Hypothesis 1), exposure to suicide or homicide compared to deaths due to natural causes (Hypothesis 2), and closeness to the deceased (defined as death of a parent compared to a friend or other relative; Hypothesis 3).

Methods

Participants and Procedures

Participants included 1281 bereaved youth aged 12–21 years (M=15; SD=1.8), 62.1% female, from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) Core Dataset (CDS; see Table 1). Caregivers and youth completed a variety of assessment measures during a clinical intake interview. As part of the intake process, clinicians conducted semi‐structured clinical interviews to gather ratings on several NCTSN‐developed forms (e.g., General and Trauma Detail Forms and Clinical Evaluation) that assessed children's mental and behavioral health difficulties and functioning as well as trauma exposure (e.g., loss, separation, and bereavement). Clinicians with Masters' degrees or higher were trained on the clinical protocol as well as the web‐based quality improvement platform used for data collection, scoring, and reporting.
TABLE 1. Demographic characteristics overall and by group
 Overall N=1281Death subgroup
Experienced death only 115 (8.98)Death and other trauma 1166 (91.0)
Demographics
Age (Year)
12–<14397 (31.0)47 (40.9)350 (30.0)
14–<17696 (54.3)55 (47.8)641 (55.0)
17 and older188 (14.7)13 (11.3)175 (15.0)
Mean (SD)15.0 (1.8)14.5 (1.6)15.1 (1.8)
Gender
Male485 (37.9)73 (63.5)412 (35.3)
Female796 (62.1)42 (36.5)754 (64.7)
Race/Ethnicity
White430 (33.6)41 (35.7)389 (33.4)
Black317 (24.7)36 (31.3)281 (24.1)
Hispanic419 (32.7)27 (23.5)392 (33.6)
Other85 (6.64)3 (2.61)82 (7.03)
Missing/unknown30 (2.34)8 (6.96)22 (1.89)
Trauma history
Number of other traumas
None113 (8.82)113 (98.3)0 (0)
1‭‐4684 (53.4)0 (0)684 (58.7)
>4482 (37.6)0 (0)482 (41.3)
Missing2 (0.16)2 (1.74)0 (0)
Mean (SD)3.9 (2.8)04.3 (2.7)
Bereavement details
People lost
Parent488 (38.1)55 (47.8)433 (37.1)
Other adult relative634 (49.5)36 (31.3)598 (51.3)
Unrelated adult127 (9.91)5 (4.35)122 (10.5)
Sibling135 (10.5)12 (10.4)123 (10.5)
Other youth277 (21.6)22 (19.1)255 (21.9)
Cause of death
Natural causes573 (44.7)44 (38.3)529 (45.4)
Violence252 (19.7)25 (21.7)227 (19.5)
Accident211 (16.5)21 (18.3)190 (16.3)
Suicide93 (7.26)10 (8.70)83 (7.12)
Other/Missing152 (11.9)15 (13.0)137 (11.8)

Measures

Demographics

Caregivers and youth completed a demographic information form that included age, gender, race, and ethnicity.

Clinical evaluation (CE)

Clinicians rated the degree to which children met criteria for 13 psychiatric disorders, other trauma‐related symptoms, and behavioral problems. Ratings were made on a 3‐point scale consisting of 0 (not present), 1 (possibly present/subclinical), and 2 (definitely present).

Indicators of severity (IOS)

Clinicians drew on information from youth, caregivers, and other collaterals to rate the severity during the past 30 days of suicidal thoughts or behaviors on a 3‐point scale (0=not a problem, 1=somewhat/sometimes a problem, 2=very much/often a problem). All indicators were dichotomized (1 or 2=1; else 0). The data were then used as operational definitions of suicide risk indicators (see Composite Suicidality Indicator below).

Composite suicidality indicator

Percent agreement between an individual's paired suicidality measures was 87.5%, kappa=0.60 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.66), providing evidence of moderate agreement between these two suicidality indicators. We thus constructed a dichotomous composite suicidality variable that captured both suicidal thoughts and behaviors (i.e., suicide attempts) as derived from the CE and IOS measures, respectively. The variable was coded as 1 if either CE or IOS was at least “probable” or “somewhat a problem” (n=319), 0 if the CE and IOS are “not present” and “not a problem” (n=895). If one measure was zero and the other was missing (n=52) or both were missing (n=15), the composite score was set to missing.

Trauma history and bereavement

The General Trauma and Trauma Details forms of the CDS were derived in part from the Trauma History Profile portion of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM‐IV (20) and include a comprehensive list of 19 different trauma types plus an open‐ended “other” item. This information was obtained from multiple informants, including the children themselves, caregivers, and other collaterals. Based on prior studies using the CDS (17), number of trauma types was categorized as follows: no other trauma types besides bereavement reported, one to four other trauma types (excluding bereavement), or greater than four other trauma types (excluding bereavement).
These forms include details regarding bereavement, such as total number of deaths, cause of death, and relationship to deceased. For the current study, number of deaths was coded dichotomously as having or not having experienced multiple deaths. Each cause of death was coded dichotomously, with death due to natural causes as the referent death compared to violent death, accidental death, or suicide.

UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM‐IV (PTSD‐RI) 21, 22

The PTSD‐RI is a self‐report questionnaire designed to assess PTSD symptoms in school‐aged children and adolescents. For this study, the frequency of symptom occurrence during the past month was rated on a five‐point scale ranging from 0 (none of the time) to 4 (most of the time). The PTSD‐RI has shown robust psychometric properties across multiple samples 22, 23. The current sample full‐scale Cronbach's alpha was 0.94.

Data Analysis

We used descriptive statistics to summarize demographic and bereavement‐related characteristics of the study sample. To investigate whether each mental or behavioral health problem would be associated with exposure to multiple deaths and/or type of death, we employed a generalized linear mixed‐effects regression model with center‐level random effects to account for correlations between youth observations within NCTSN centers. We included demographic characteristics and number of other traumas in the regression models. To evaluate whether relationship to the deceased was associated with any indicators of mental or behavioral health risk, we performed a subgroup analysis using the same regression model with a subgroup of youth who reported a single death. We also used the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test to examine potential links between relationship to the person who died and cause of death. We conducted all analyses using SAS 9.4 for Windows and adopted p<0.05 (two‐tailed) as the significance threshold.

Results

Table 1 provides demographic characteristics for the total sample. Most youth (91%) reported at least one additional traumatic event besides the death of a loved one (overall mean=4.3, median=4 total trauma types). Relationship to the deceased included non‐parent adult relative (49.5%), parent (38.1%), non‐sibling youth (21.6%), sibling (10.5%), and unrelated adult (9.9%). Regarding cause of death, 44.7% identified natural causes, 19.7% homicide, 16.5% accident, 7.26% suicide, and 11.9% were unknown or missing.

Demographic Characteristics and Suicide Risk Markers

Table 2 presents results from the adjusted regression analyses. Compared to youth aged 12–14, older youth (aged 15–17) were more likely to experience suicidal thoughts or behaviors, alcohol use, substance use, depression, and PTSD. Youth older than 17 were also significantly more likely to use alcohol or substances and to experience depression and PTSD compared to youth aged 12–14. Compared to males, females were at higher risk for suicidal thoughts or behaviors, non‐suicidal self‐injury, depression, and PTSD. Compared to Black youth, White youth were more likely to experience suicidal thoughts or behaviors, non‐suicidal self‐injury, and alcohol use.
TABLE 2. Regression analyses of mental and behavioral health problems
N=1281Composite suicidalityNon‐suicidal self‐injuryAlcohol use
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
Demographics
Age
12–14REF REF REF 
15–171.46 (1.02–2.08)0.0390.85 (0.551.31)0.464.92 (2.68–9.04)<0.001
>171.55 (0.962.52)0.080.99 (0.551.76)0.967.60 (3.80–15.2)<0.001
Female1.88 (1.35–2.62)<0.0011.91 (1.25–2.92)0.0030.75 (0.491.14)0.18
Race/Ethnicity
WhiteREF REF REF 
Black0.60 (0.38–0.95)0.030.19 (0.10–0.37)<0.0010.30 (0.16–0.59)<0.001
Hispanic0.72 (0.451.14)0.160.65 (0.391.10)0.110.84 (0.481.46)0.54
Other0.81 (0.441.51)0.520.62 (0.301.27)0.190.91 (0.451.82)0.79
Missing0.85 (0.292.44)0.761.13 (0.333.89)0.851.19 (0.334.33)0.79
Trauma history
No. of other traumas
NoneREF REF REF 
1–41.43 (0.762.69)0.262.70 (1.017.26)0.053.00 (1.06–8.48)0.04
>42.09 (1.08–4.04)0.033.58 (1.30–9.86)0.014.41 (1.53–12.7)0.006
Bereavement details
Multiple deaths1.11 (0.781.59)0.551.20 (0.781.83)0.410.98 (0.631.52)0.92
Cause of death
Natural causesREF REF REF 
Homicide0.76 (0.511.13)0.170.63 (0.371.06)0.081.61 (0.982.65)0.06
Accident0.81 (0.541.22)0.320.71 (0.431.16)0.171.17 (0.711.93)0.53
Suicide1.68 (1.00–2.81)0.0490.96 (0.521.78)0.912.33 (1.27–4.28)<0.001
 Substance use (CE)DepressionPTSD RI
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pEstimate (SE)p
Demographics
Age
12–14REF REF REFREF
14–174.00 (2.376.74)<0.0011.63 (1.192.23)0.0032.26 (1.03)0.03
>177.57 (4.0214.3)<0.0011.83 (1.132.95)0.015.51 (1.48)<0.001
Female0.77 (0.52–1.14)0.201.50 (1.112.03)0.015.48 (0.97)<0.001
Race/Ethnicity
WhiteREF REF REFREF
Black0.59 (0.33–1.08)0.090.94 (0.61–1.44)0.770.83 (1.31)0.53
Hispanic0.85 (0.46–1.58)0.611.19 (0.75–1.89)0.450.61 (1.34)0.65
Other0.82 (0.36–1.87)0.640.72 (0.40–1.31)0.282.78 (1.97)0.16
Missing/Unknown0.55 (0.09–3.25)0.511.14 (0.44–2.95)0.79–3.56 (3.35)0.29
Trauma history
No. of other traumas
NoneREF REF REFREF
1–43.16 (1.188.51)0.021.34 (0.82, 2.20)0.251.77 (1.70)0.30
>44.33 (1.5612.0)0.0052.36 (1.354.13)0.0035.22 (1.83)0.004
Bereavement details
Multiple deaths0.98 (0.63–1.51)0.911.22 (0.85–1.75)0.293.36 (1.11)0.003
Cause of death
Natural causesREF REF REFREF
Homicide1.76 (1.102.83)0.020.80 (0.56–1.16)0.241.30 (1.16)0.26
Accident1.15 (0.70–1.90)0.570.91 (0.61–1.35)0.64–1.05 (1.24)0.40
Suicide1.74 (0.91–3.32)0.100.85 (0.49–1.47)0.56–1.59 (1.74)0.36
Note: "Bolded" findings represent statistically significant results.
Abbreviations: CE, clinical evaluation; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder.
Hypothesis 1
A greater number of deaths will be associated with increased mental and behavioral health problems.
Hypothesis 1 received partial support, in that youth who experienced multiple deaths had significantly higher PTSD scores (Estimated difference ±SE=3.36 ± 1.11, p=0.003). However, total number of deaths experienced was not related to any other criterion.
Hypothesis 2
Compared to anticipated deaths, deaths due to homicide and suicide will be associated with increased mental and behavioral health problems.
Consistent with Hypothesis 2, compared to youth bereaved by natural causes, youth bereaved by suicide were significantly more likely to experience both suicidal thoughts or behaviors (AOR=1.68, p=0.049) and alcohol use (AOR=2.33, p<0.001); youth bereaved by homicide were at significantly greater risk for substance use (AOR=1.76, p=0.02).
Hypothesis 3
Greater closeness to the deceased will be associated with increased mental and behavioral health problems.
Because exposure to multiple deaths can obscure potential effects linked to different relationships to the deceased, we conducted a subgroup analysis of youth bereaved by only one death (n=964). Partially supporting Hypothesis 3, compared to parentally bereaved youth, youth who lost a peer were more likely to use alcohol (AOR=2.32, p=0.02) or substances (AOR=2.41, p=0.01). Also consistent with Hypothesis 3, youth who lost a parent were more likely to experience depression compared to youth who lost another adult relative or an unrlated adult (AOR=0.64, p=0.04; AOR=0.40, p=0.01, respectively).
To rule out the possibility that significant associations between relationship to the deceased and mental/behavioral health risk are at least partially statistically explained by cause of death, we examined potential relations between cause of death and relationship to the deceased. Among youth bereaved by suicide, 44% experienced the death of a parent, whereas only 23% experienced the death of a peer. In contrast, among youth bereaved by an accident, 26% experienced the death of a parent, whereas 35% experienced the death of a peer.

Discussion

This study builds upon prior research on childhood bereavement by examining bereavement‐related contextual factors in relation to mental and behavioral health problems among treatment‐seeking adolescents while accounting for demographics and other types of trauma. Our findings suggest that specific bereavement‐related factors are differentially associated with certain mental and behavioral health problems. Identifying bereavement‐related risk markers that co‐occur with mental and behavioral health problems represents a first step toward improving case identification and, if replicated longitudinally, prevention.
Our study is consistent with other research in identifying important demographic differences in mental and behavioral health risk. Specifically, compared to younger youth, older youth (those above age 14) were more likely to endorse a number of mental and behavioral health issues including substance use (5), alcohol use (5), suicidal thoughts and behaviors (6), depression (24), and PTSD (25). Also consistent with previous literature, females were significantly more likely to exhibit non‐suicidal self‐injurious behaviors (26), depression (27), and PTSD (25).
Similar to other studies focusing on racial differences in suicidal ideation (28), the current study found that Black youth were less likely to be at risk for suicide than White youth. This finding could be attributable to cultural differences in coping with adversity. For example, studies have found that Black adolescents, compared to White adolescents, tend to cope with problems by seeking spiritual support (29), which often involves a focus on social connectedness, religious beliefs, and cultural proscriptions against suicide in particular (30). Studies also suggest that Black youth may have better access to additional protective factors, such as perceived family connectedness, emotional well‐being, and higher levels of self‐esteem (29).
In addition, the number of traumas experienced was significantly associated with all mental health outcomes. Specifically, youth who had experienced more than four traumatic events were consistently at greater risk for each of the mental and behavioral health problems examined. This is consistent with prior findings 1, 2, including ACEs studies, linking the accumulation of childhood traumas and other adversities with problematic outcomes (10).
Our findings partially supported our first hypothesis—that the likelihood of mental and behavioral health problems would increase as a function of total number of deaths, above and beyond the effects of other traumatic experiences. However, this finding emerged for PTSD only. These findings are again consistent with ACE study findings (10) of dose‐response relations between number of childhood adversities (including losses) and PTSD in particular 11, 13.
We found partial support for our second hypothesis, in that suicide and homicide deaths, compared to natural causes, were differentially associated with distinct mental and behavioral health problems while controlling for other forms of trauma. Although few studies have explicitly examined associations between cause of death and post‐death functioning among bereaved youth, a greater number of studies call attention to ways in which traumatogenic factors embedded within the circumstances of the death can evoke psychological distress and interfere with bereaved youths' ability to grieve adaptively (31). In addition, highly traumatizing or stigmatized deaths (e.g., suicide or homicide), may induce surviving caregivers to conceal the true cause of death to “protect” bereaved youth—a circumstance that can both impede caregiver grief facilitation, limit open, and honest communication between family members, and increase risk for persisting distress among children and adolescents (32).
Consistent with recent studies of adults bereaved as children (8), our findings indicate that youth bereaved by suicide were more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors themselves. Exposure to suicide death was the only bereavement‐related variable associated with suicidal thoughts or behaviors among bereaved youth. Notably, not all youth bereaved by suicide in this sample were related to the deceased; approximately 23% of suicide‐related deaths were peer deaths, suggesting that the link between suicide bereavement and suicide risk in youth cannot be explained by shared familial environment or biology alone. Instead, evidence points to other potential mechanisms such as contagion or imitation (17). For example, studies of adolescents who have either attempted or died by suicide tend to report prior suicide deaths occurring in close temporal proximity (33). The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (34) suggests that both perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness are likely to lead to increased suicidal ideation. A recent study showed that thwarted belongingness in particular mediated the relation between bereavement and suicide risk in adolescents (35), suggesting that youth bereaved by suicide may feel especially isolated and alone following the death. It is also possible that for youth who lost a loved one due to suicide, increased suicidal thoughts or behaviors represent reenactments or fantasies as the individual attempts to understand and adjust to the loss. Similarly, depending on one's spiritual beliefs, some youth may wish to die as a means of reuniting with the deceased, as opposed to being driven primarily by a desire to hurt oneself or die (16).
Although the current study design did not permit examination of youth's grief reactions, it is reasonable to hypothesize that youth bereaved by violent or otherwise intentional deaths may experience higher levels of maladaptive grief reactions, as well as guilt, remorse, or anger, which may then lead to greater mental and behavioral health problems in youth (35) and adults (36). The current study found significantly increased risks for alcohol use among youth bereaved by suicide, and for substance use among youth bereaved by homicide. This indicates that there may be differential relations between cause of death and distinct behavioral health problems. Perceived stigma can also produce feelings of disenfranchised grief, raising the risk for mental and behavioral health problems among bereaved youth. The potential role of stigma was underscored by a recent longitudinal study, which found that the statistical association between bereavement by suicide and future suicide attempts became nonsignificant after accounting for perceived stigma (14).
Youth bereaved by suicide or homicide were no more likely than youth bereaved by natural deaths to experience higher levels of depression or PTSD. This finding contrasts with those from other studies linking violent deaths to higher levels of anxiety, depression, and PTSD in adolescents (37). However, recent work has demonstrated that youth who lose a loved one due to anticipated death also tend to exhibit high levels of PTSD (32). This may be due to the traumatogenic features inherent in anticipated deaths, such as witnessing the slow, painful, and/or progressive deterioration of a loved one, the causal potency of which can often be overlooked 31, 32.
Consistent with prior studies of bereaved youth, those who lost a parent experienced higher levels of depression than youth who lost an adult relative or an unrelated adult (5). Depressive symptoms are not only common after losing a close loved one; they can also mimic grief reactions. These reactions include separation distress (yearning for the person who died) and existential/identify distress (feeling empty or that life is meaningless, now that the person is gone), which are both common reactions to the death of a parent 9, 31. In contrast, youth who lost a peer were more likely to engage in alcohol use or substance use compared to those who experienced the death of a parent. The most common cause of death among peers was accidental death, which may involve reckless behavior and/or substance use. Thus, it is also possible that substance use problems may have preceded the experience of losing a peer if they were already engaging in these behaviors with their peer group. Adolescents' grief reactions can take the form of engaging in behaviors associated with the lost relationship (including substance use) as a means of identifying with the deceased, preserving their memory, and carrying on their role, regardless of whether those behaviors are adaptive or maladaptive 9, 31.

Study Strengths and Limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine mental and behavioral health problems in a large, national sample of clinically referred bereaved youth, while controlling for the number of other forms of trauma. Study strengths include examining a wide range of mental and behavioral health outcomes, including suicide risk and accounting for additional traumatic experiences above and beyond bereavement. Study limitations include: First, we were unable to determine the age at which youth had experienced the death(s). Recent evidence suggests that youth who experience the death of a parent prior to age 6 are at significantly greater risk for future suicide (8), suggesting an important direction for future research. Second, analyses regarding relationship to the deceased were limited to a smaller sub‐sample of youth bereaved by the death of only one person. Nevertheless, this sub‐sample of youth did not differ from the larger sample on any variables of interest, suggesting that the findings likely apply to the larger sample. Future work can further explore whether risk for mental and behavioral health problems varies as a function of relationship to the deceased. Third, the study population was comprised of clinical‐referred youth; thus, our findings may not generalize to community samples. Fourth, although the large sample size was a general strength of this study, some of the observed effects may require further replication to determine clinical significance, as diminishing effect sizes become statistically significant with larger samples.
Our findings underscore the value of “unpacking” adverse life experiences to identify incrementally useful markers of mental and behavioral health risk in treatment‐seeking adolescents (3). Bereavement‐related characteristics exhibited unique associations with mental and behavioral health problems, above and beyond other forms of trauma. Additional research is needed to better understand potential moderators and mediators that can help to explain these relations. Incorporating bereavement‐related factors into assessment protocols carries the potential for improving early risk screening and prevention efforts among bereaved adolescents. Youth who endorse a greater number of prior losses, as well as those bereaved by homicide or suicide, may be at particularly high risk for mental and behavioral health problems. Further, if replicated longitudinally, our identification of differential relations between specific bereavement‐related factors and distinct mental and behavioral health issues (e.g., bereavement due to suicide predicts suicidal thoughts or behaviors) may permit improved tailoring of intervention efforts to address distinct mental and behavioral health outcomes. For example, interventions for bereaved youth that focus on processing the cause of death, as well as associated maladaptive cognitions or feelings (guilt and shame) may be especially helpful in preventing future suicidal ideation or attempts (38).

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was developed under grant numbers 2U79SM054284‐12S (PI: Pynoos) and SM062111 and SM16008 (PI: Kaplow) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). We would also like to acknowledge the 56 sites within the National Child Traumatic Stress Network that have contributed data to the Core Data Set and the children and families who have contributed to our growing understanding of child traumatic stress. Drs. Kaplow, Layne and Pynoos receive royalties from Cambridge University Press for their book, Trauma and Grief Component Therapy for Adolescents: A modular approach to treating traumatized and bereaved youth. Drs. Steinberg and Pynoos are Chief Science Officer and Chief Medical Officer, respectively, of Behavioral Health Innovations, LLC, a company designed to develop and distribute evidence‐based assessment tools for traumatized and bereaved youth. Drs. Kaplow and Layne receive payment from Behavioral Health Innovations, LLC for sales of their measure, the Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (PCBD) Checklist. All remaining co‐authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, (Grant/Award Number: “2U79SM054284‐12S,” “SM062111,” “SM16008”).

REFERENCES

1.
Copeland WE, Keeler G, Angold A, et al: Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64(5):577–584. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.577
2.
Phillips NK, Hammen CL, Brennan PA, et al: Early adversity and the prospective prediction of depressive and anxiety disorders in adolescence. J Ab Child Psychol. 2005; 33(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-0930-3
3.
Layne CM, Olsen JA, BakerLegerski AJP, et al: Unpacking trauma exposure risk factors and differential pathways of influence: predicting post‐war mental distress in Bosnian adolescents. Child Dev. 2010; 81:1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01454.x
4.
Keyes KM, Pratt C, Galea S, et al: The burden of loss: unexpected death of a loved one and psychiatric disorders across the life course in a national study. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(8):864–871. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081132
5.
Kaplow JB, Saunders J, Angold A, et al: Psychiatric symptoms in bereaved versus nonbereaved youth and young adults: a longitudinal, epidemiological study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49(11):1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.004
6.
Brent DA, Baugher M, Bridge J, et al: Age‐and sex‐related risk factors for adolescent suicide. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999; 38(12):1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199912000-00010
7.
Kaplow JB, Layne CM: Sudden loss and psychiatric disorders across the life course: toward a developmental lifespan theory of bereavement‐related risk and resilience. Am J Psychiatry. 2014; 171(8):807–810. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14050676
8.
Guldin MB, Li J, Pedersen HS, et al: Incidence of suicide among persons who had a parent who died during their childhood: a population‐based cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 72(12):1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2094
9.
Kaplow JB, Layne CM, Pynoos RS, et al: DSM‐5 diagnostic criteria for bereavement‐related disorders in children and adolescents: developmental considerations. Psychiatry. 2012; 75(3):242–265. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2012.75.3.243
10.
Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, et al: Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14(4):245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
11.
Ford JD, Elhai JD, Connor DF, et al: Poly‐victimization and risk of posttraumatic, depressive, and substance use disorders and involvement in delinquency in a national sample of adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 46(6):545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.11.212
12.
Clark DB, Thatcher DL, Martin CS: Child abuse and other traumatic experiences, alcohol use disorders, and health problems in adolescence and young adulthood. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 35(5):499–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp117
13.
Cougle JR, Timpano KR, Sachs‐Ericsson N, et al: Examining the unique relationships between anxiety disorders and childhood physical and sexual abuse in the National Comorbidity Survey‐Replication. Psychiatry Res. 2010; 177(1–2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.008
14.
Pitman AL, Osborn DP, Rantell K, et al: Bereavement by suicide as a risk factor for suicide attempt: a cross‐sectional national UK‐wide study of 3432 young bereaved adults. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1):e009948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009948
15.
Layne CM, Greeson JKP, Kim S, et al. Links between trauma exposure and adolescent high‐risk health behaviors: findings from the NCTSN Core Data Set. Psychol Trauma. 2014; 6(Suppl 1):S40–S49. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037799
16.
Pitman A, Osborn D, King M, et al: Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2014; 1(1):86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70224-X
17.
Brent DA, Mann JJ: Family genetic studies, suicide, and suicidal behavior. A J of Med Genet C Semin in Med Genet. 2005; 133(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30042
18.
Pynoos RS, Steinberg AM, Layne CM, et al: Modeling constellations of trauma exposure in the national child traumatic stress Network Core data set. Psychol Trauma. 2014; 6(Suppl 1):S9–S17. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037767
19.
Kaplow JB, Layne CM, Saltzman WR, et al: Using multidimensional grief theory to explore the effects of deployment, reintegration, and death on military youth and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013; 16(3):322–340. https://doi.org/10.11007/s10567-013-0143-1
20.
Steinberg AM, Pynoos RS, Gerrity ET, et al: The NCTSN Core Data Set: emerging findings, future directions, and implications for theory, research, practice, and policy. Psychol Trauma. 2014; 6(Suppl 1): S50‐S57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037798
21.
Steinberg AM, Brymer MJ, Kim S, et al: Psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction Index: Part 1. J Trauma Stress. 2013; 26(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21780
22.
Steinberg AM, Brymer M, Decker K, et al: The UCLA PTSD reaction Index. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2004; 6(2):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-004-0048-2
23.
Elhai JD, Layne CM, Steinberg AS, et al: Psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index Part 2: investigating factor structure findings in a national clinic‐referred youth sample. J Trauma Stress. 2013; 26(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21755
24.
Hankin BL, Abramson LY, Moffitt TE, et al: Development of depression from preadolescent to young adulthood: emerging gender differences in a 10‐year longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998; 107(1):128–140.
25.
Kaplow JB, Dodge KA, Amaya‐Jackson L, et al: Pathways to PTSD, Part II: sexually abused children. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162(7):1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi/ajp.162.7.1305
26.
Sornberger MJ, Heath NL, Toste JR, et al: Nonsuicidal self‐injury and gender: patterns of prevalence, methods, and locations among adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012; 41(3):266–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.0088.x
27.
Kandel DB, Davies M: Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents: an empirical study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982; 39(10):1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100065011
28.
Merchant C, Kramer A, Joe S, et al: Predictors of multiple suicide attempts among suicidal black adolescents. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009; 39(2):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2009.39.2.115
29.
Chapman PL, Mullis RL: Racial differences in adolescent coping and self‐esteem. J Genet Psychol. 2000; 161(2):152–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320009596702
30.
Kaplow JB, Gipson PY, Horwitz AG, et al: Emotional suppression mediates the relation between adverse life events and adolescent suicide: implications for prevention. Prev Science. 2014; 15(2):177‐185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0367-9
31.
Layne CM, Kaplow JB, Oosterhoff B, et al: The interplay between posttraumatic stress and grief reactions in traumatically bereaved adolescents: when trauma, bereavement, and adolescence converge. Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017; 7(4):266–285. https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676608666180306162544
32.
Kaplow JB, Howell KH, Layne CM: Do circumstances of the death matter? Identifying socioenvironmental risks for grief‐related psychopathology in bereaved youth. J Trauma Stress. 2014; 27(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21877
33.
Bridge JA, Goldstein TR, Brent DA: Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006; 47(3–4):372–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01615
34.
Chu C, Buchman‐Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, et al: The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of a decade of cross‐national research. Psychol Bull. 2017; 143(12):1313–1345. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123
35.
Hill R, Kaplow J, Oosterhoff B, et al: Understanding grief reactions, thwarted belongingness, and suicide ideation in bereaved adolescents: toward a unifying theory. J Clin Psychol. 2019; 75(4):780–793.
36.
Szanto K, Prigerson H, Houck P, et al: Suicidal ideation in elderly bereaved: the role of complicated grief. Suicide and Life Threat Behav. 1997; 27(2):194–207.
37.
Dillen L, Fontaine JR, Verhofstadt‐Denève L: Confirming the distinctiveness of complicated grief from depression and anxiety among adolescents. Death Stud. 2009; 33(5):437–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180902805673
38.
Saltzman W, Layne C, Pynoos R, et al: Trauma and Grief Component Therapy for Adolescents: A Modular Approach to Treating Traumatized and Bereaved Youth. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2017

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
Pages: 88 - 96

History

Received: 17 July 2019
Revision received: 13 September 2020
Accepted: 28 October 2020
Published online: 16 December 2020
Published in print: Summer 2021

Authors

Details

Julie B. Kaplow
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Rachel Wamser‐Nanney
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Christopher M. Layne
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Amanda Burnside
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Cheryl King
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Li‐Jung Liang
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Alan Steinberg
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Ernestine Briggs
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Liza Suarez
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)
Robert Pynoos
The Trauma and Grief Center at the Hackett Center for Mental Health, Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute, Houston, TX (J. B. Kaplow); Department of Psychology, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO (R. Wamser‐Nanney); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, University of California, Los Angeles (C. M. Layne, A. Steinberg, R. Pynoos); Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL (A. Burnside); Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C. King); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (L. Liang); UCLA/Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (E. Briggs); Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (L. Suarez)

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Kaplow ([email protected])

Funding Information

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: 2U79SM054284‐12S, SM062111, SM16008

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share