Mental Health Service Use Among African-American Emerging Adults, by Provider Type and Recency of Use
Abstract
Objective
This study examined factors associated with mental health service utilization among African-American emerging adults, specifically, when services were used (recency) and the types of providers visited (mental health versus non–mental health).
Methods
Guided by the behavioral model for vulnerable populations, secondary analysis of responses to the National Survey of American Life (2001–2003) was conducted. A nationally representative sample of African-American emerging adults, ages 18–29 (N=806), were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. “Evaluated need” was determined by endorsement of mood, anxiety, substance use, or impulse control diagnoses. Respondents who reported a need for services for emotional or substance use problems were considered to have a “perceived need.” Those who reported voluntary use of mental health or general medical services to address these problems were considered to have utilized services.
Results
Twenty-five percent of the sample utilized services in their lifetime, whereas 9% utilized services in the past 12 months. Females were more likely than males to utilize services in three of the four service use categories (lifetime, mental health sector, and non–mental health sector). Respondents with an evaluated need for services were two to 12 times more likely to have used services compared with those without a need for them.
Conclusions
Little is known about why African-American emerging adults underutilize mental health services. Being female and having an evaluated need for services were associated with greater odds of service use, which would suggest the need for additional examination of gender differences in service utilization and greater mental health outreach and education among African-American males.
More than 23 million U.S. adults age 18 years and older who experience mental illness never utilize mental health services (1–4). Research indicates that being African American or an emerging adult (age 18–29) is further associated with decreased mental health service utilization compared with older African Americans or Caucasians of any age (5–9). African-American adults utilize outpatient mental health services at half the rate of Caucasians (6,9,10), and emerging adults are less likely than adults age 26 and older to utilize services, with utilization rates of 40% or less compared with 62%−71%, respectively (5,7,8,11–14). African Americans (4,9) and emerging adults (14,15) are more likely to seek mental health services from providers outside the mental health sector, such as general physicians and religious or spiritual advisors.
Gender, need for services, and access to health insurance have been found to influence mental health service use among African Americans (6,16–18) and emerging adults (5,14,19). Less is known about the factors that facilitate or hinder service use among a specific subset of these groups, African-American emerging adults (20,21). This gap in the literature is concerning given that African-American emerging adults are an especially high-risk group because of combined influences of disproportionate burden of mental illness experienced by African Americans (4) and their greater likelihood of experiencing persistent illness once diagnosed (22,23). Compared with older adults, emerging adults of any race or ethnicity are at increased risk for the onset of severe mental illness (7,19,24–26), with three-fourths of all lifetime cases of mental illness beginning by age 24 (8). Although few studies have sought to examine specific rates of mental illness among African-American emerging adults in particular, complex interactions between age and race have been noted (27). Findings from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study indicate that African-American emerging adults had higher 12-month rates of major depression compared with other racial-ethnic and age groups (27).
Although the exact prevalence of mental illness in this population is unclear, the fact remains that African-American emerging adults are at risk of experiencing mental illness and are less likely than other groups to seek mental health services when needed (9,28). Untreated mental illness often leads to serious personal and societal consequences, many of which are disproportionally experienced by African-American emerging adults. This population has lower college graduation rates and higher rates of homelessness and unemployment compared with Caucasian emerging adults (29–31). The disproportional rate of these issues among African Americans may be attributed to differences in social positioning and other social determinants compared with Caucasians (27,32). However, given the potentially cumulative vulnerabilities of the impact of race and age on incidence of mental illness for African-American emerging adults and their quality of life (4,27,33), it is crucial to examine factors that may increase utilization of mental health services in this population.
This study used the behavioral model for vulnerable populations to explore mental health service use among African-American emerging adults (34). This model posits that predisposing factors (sociodemographic factors), enabling factors (resources that facilitate service use), and need factors (evaluated or perceived need for services) may predict service use in vulnerable populations. This study used eight predictor variables of service use commonly cited in the literature and drawn from the model. For example, predisposing factors, such as being female (17), more educated (17), and employed (35), are associated with increased service use. Enabling factors, such as mental health insurance coverage (6,17), higher perceived emotional support (36), and lower perceived racial discrimination (6), have been found to improve the likelihood of mental health service use. Having an evaluated need or a perceived need for services has been cited as the strongest predictor of service use (37).
To further address the dearth of literature on this topic, this study focused exclusively on African-American emerging adults and used a nationally representative sample to examine within-group differences that may influence service utilization in this group. To date, most research investigating service use provides comparisons by either race-ethnicity or age (1,8); therefore, it has been difficult to clearly ascertain the factors that facilitate or hinder service use in this specific subgroup. Thus the objective was to determine the association of predisposing, enabling, and need factors with mental health service utilization among African-American emerging adults.
Methods
Sample
This study analyzed data from the National Survey of American Life (NSAL). It is a multistage, integrated national household probability sample of 6,082 English-speaking African-American, Afro-Caribbean, and non-Hispanic Caucasian adults, age 18 years and older and residing in the continental United States. Data were collected between February 2001 and March 2003 and focused on mental disorders and formal or informal service use among racial-ethnic minority groups (27,38). This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the University of Michigan. A determination of exemption was later obtained from Washington University in St. Louis’ IRB. Further details of the NSAL can be found elsewhere (27). For the purposes of this study, a subset of the African-American respondents from the original NSAL adult interviews was analyzed: emerging adults ages 18 to 29 (N=806).
Measures
Mental health service utilization.
Respondents were asked whether they had ever seen a professional for problems with their emotions, nerves, or use of alcohol or drugs and whether they had ever talked to a general medical doctor or any other professional about their problems with a specific disorder (such as depression, panic disorder, substance use, or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]). They were also asked a series of questions about talking to a professional (including a psychiatrist, family doctor, social worker, counselor, or religious or spiritual advisor) about their mental health.
Service use over the lifetime and in the past 12 months was assessed. Respondents who reported having used mental health services in their lifetime were asked whether they had sought help from psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, social workers, counselors, or mental health nurses in the mental health sector or from family doctors, any other medical doctors, any other health professionals, religious or spiritual advisors, and any other healers in the non–mental health sector.
Independent variables.
The author examined the following sociodemographic correlates of mental health service utilization: gender, education (≤11 years, 12 years, 13–15 years, ≥16 years), and employment status (employed, unemployed, or not in labor force). Respondents indicated whether they had private (through their employer’s or their family’s insurance), public (including any federal government health insurance programs), or no mental health insurance. Perceived emotional support was determined with three items asking how often family members (other than spouse or partner) “make you feel loved and cared for, listen to you talk about your private problems and concerns, and express interest and concern in your well-being.” Possible responses were very often, fairly often, not too often, and never. These answers were reverse coded to generate a scale of perceived emotional support, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived emotional support. Cronbach’s alpha for this three-item index was .74.
Perceived racial discrimination was assessed with the Major Experiences of Discrimination scale (39). Respondents were asked whether they had ever experienced nine major episodes of discrimination (for example, being unfairly discouraged by a teacher from continuing with education, being unfairly fired, or being unfairly stopped, searched, questioned, or physically threatened or abused by the police). For each of the nine discrimination events experienced, respondents were asked to identify one main reason for the discriminatory experience. Reasons included ancestry or national origins, gender, race, age, height or weight, and shade of skin. For this study, the variable of interest was whether the respondent identified race as the primary reason for any discriminatory experience. This variable was coded as a dichotomous variable, with a value of 1 indicating the respondent had experienced at least one discriminatory experience based on race and a value of zero indicating no racial discriminatory experiences. Cronbach’s alpha for this item was .67.
Evaluated need was determined with the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WHO-CIDI), a comprehensive, fully structured interview designed to be used by trained lay interviewers for the assessment of mental disorders according to the definitions and criteria of the DSM-IV (27). Consistent concordance between the CIDI and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV has been shown in individual and aggregate-level analyses (40). Respondents were asked questions about physical and emotional well-being in their lifetime (for example, “Have you ever in your life had an attack of fear or panic when all of a sudden you felt very frightened, anxious, or uneasy?”). If they answered yes to specific screener questions, respondents were asked additional questions about the specific disorder to further determine whether they met the DSM-IV criterion for the disorder. If the respondent met the criterion for a particular disorder, he or she was considered “endorsed” for the disorder.
Endorsement of at least one DSM-IV diagnosis type was then grouped into one of four categories: mood disorders (major depressive episode, dysthymia, mania, bipolar disorder types I and II), anxiety disorders (agoraphobia without panic disorder, agoraphobia with panic disorder, panic disorder, panic attacks, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and adult separation anxiety), substance use disorders (alcohol abuse and dependence and drug abuse and dependence), and impulse control disorders (any binge eating, ADHD, and oppositional defiant disorder).
Perceived need was assessed by one item asking “Was there ever a time during the past 12 months when you felt that you might need to see a professional because of problems with your emotions or nerves or your use of alcohol or drugs?”
Statistical analysis
Bivariate logistic regressions were conducted. Separate multivariate logistic regressions were constructed to assess the independent associations of each predictor variable with mental health service use by recency of use and provider types seen. All analyses were performed with the survey command in Stata 12.1/SE (41), which accounted for the complex multistage clustered survey design of the NSAL sample, unequal probabilities of selection, nonresponse, and poststratification to calculate weighted, nationally representative population estimates and standard errors. All percentages reported were weighted for the NSAL-only sample.
Results
As shown in Table 1, the mean age of respondents was 23.5 years, a majority (66%) were women, and nearly three-fourths (72%) were employed. Nearly half (44%) were high school graduates, and less than one-tenth (8%) were college graduates. Forty-seven percent of the sample endorsed at least one type of DSM-IV diagnosis in their lifetime, whereas 28% of the sample endorsed at least one type of DSM-IV diagnosis in the past 12 months. Conversely, only 5% of the sample perceived a need for mental health services in the past 12 months.
| Characteristic | N | %a |
|---|---|---|
| Age (M±SD) | 23.5±3.5 | |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 531 | 65.9 |
| Male | 275 | 34.1 |
| Education | ||
| Some high school | 186 | 23.1 |
| High school graduate | 356 | 44.2 |
| Some college | 196 | 24.3 |
| College graduate | 68 | 8.4 |
| Employment status | ||
| Employed | 581 | 72.1 |
| Unemployed | 135 | 16.8 |
| Not in labor force | 90 | 11.2 |
| Mental health insurance coverage | ||
| Private | 231 | 31.3 |
| Public | 133 | 18.0 |
| None | 375 | 50.7 |
| Perceived emotional support (M±SD)b | 9.99±2.2 | |
| Perceived racial discrimination (≥1 event) | 257 | 31.9 |
| Evaluated need | ||
| Lifetime | 372 | 47.1 |
| Past 12 months | 219 | 27.7 |
| Perceived need | 38 | 5.1 |
| Mental health service utilization | ||
| Lifetime | 200 | 24.8 |
| Past 12 months | 74 | 9.2 |
| Mental health sector | 79 | 9.8 |
| Non–mental health sector | 33 | 4.1 |
a
All percentages are weighted.
b
Possible scores range from 4 to 12, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived emotional support.
With adjustment for all other variables, gender, educational attainment, and need increased the likelihood of mental health service utilization (Table 2). Among respondents who had utilized services in their lifetime, women were twice as likely as men to utilize services (odds ratio [OR]=1.9). Having an evaluated need was significantly associated with increased likelihood of service use compared with those who did not have a need (OR=8.7). For past 12-month utilization, respondents with an evaluated need were 12 times more likely than those without an evaluated need to have utilized services (OR=12.3).
| Lifetime use | Past-12-month use | Mental health sector | Non–mental health sector | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
| Female (reference: male) | 1.9*** | 1.3–2.8 | 1.0 | .4–2.3 | 1.7* | 1.0–3.0 | 3.1* | 1.0–8.6 |
| Education attained (reference: some high school) | ||||||||
| High school graduate | .8 | .5–1.4 | .9 | .3–2.9 | .8 | .4–1.5 | 3.9 | .6–6.1 |
| Some college | 1.4 | .7–2.5 | .9 | .2–3.6 | .9 | .5–1.7 | 9.1* | .8–11.0 |
| College graduate | 1.1 | .4–3.1 | 1.0 | .9 | .3–2.6 | 1.9 | .3–4.1 | |
| Employment status (reference: employed) | ||||||||
| Unemployed | 1.0 | .5–1.8 | .7 | .2–2.8 | .9 | .3–2.6 | 2.8 | .7–4.1 |
| Not in labor force | 1.2 | .5–2.8 | 1.1 | .3–3.9 | 1.6 | .6–4.4 | .7 | .3–2.8 |
| Mental health insurance coverage (reference: private) | ||||||||
| Public | 1.0 | .5–2.1 | .6 | .2–2.1 | .7 | .3–1.8 | 2.2 | .8–2.6 |
| No insurance | .5 | .5–1.4 | .6 | .2–1.6 | 1.0 | .5–2.2 | 1.1 | .6–1.6 |
| Perceived emotional support | 1.0 | .9–1.1 | 1.0 | .7–1.3 | 1.0 | .9–1.1 | 1.0 | .8–1.1 |
| ≥1 perceived racial discrimination event (reference: no perceived discrimination) | .9 | .5–1.6 | .8 | .3–2.6 | .8 | .3–1.8 | 1.2 | .5–3.3 |
| Evaluated need (reference: no need) | 8.7*** | 4.8–15.5 | 12.3*** | 3.7–40.6 | 3.4** | 1.5–7.9 | 102.9*** | 13.0–846.0 |
| Perceived need (reference: no)a | 1.5 | .4–5.3 | ||||||
a
Perceived need was included only in the past-12-month use analysis.
*p≤.05, **p≤.01, ***p≤.001
Women were almost twice as likely as men to have sought treatment from mental health sector providers (OR=1.7), whereas persons with an evaluated need were three times more likely than those without an evaluated need to have seen providers in the mental health sector (OR=3.4). Being female (OR=3.1), attending some college (OR=9.1), and having an evaluated need (OR=102.9) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of utilization of non–mental health sector providers.
Discussion
This study sought to discover the factors that predict mental health service utilization by recency of use and by provider type. Results indicated that being female, attending some college, and having an evaluated need were associated with increased likelihood of utilizing mental health services. These results are consistent with previous research, which has found that among African Americans (17) and emerging adults (42) women were more likely than men to utilize services in general and to utilize more formalized mental health services. This gender difference in service use could be explained by prior literature indicating that African-American emerging adult men were more likely to rely solely on informal support when seeking assistance (43).
Higher educational attainment, including number of years in college (44), has been associated with greater likelihood of receiving mental health services among African-American emerging adults (17). It is possible that this study’s results reflect respondents who were currently in college and utilizing services as well as those who may be more open to seeking services based on insight gained while in college. Consistent with previous literature (16,35,37), evaluated need was significantly associated with every mental health utilization category. This finding indicates that among this sample of African-American emerging adults, individuals who needed services were, to some extent, utilizing them.
This study showed that employment status and mental health insurance coverage were not significantly associated with increased odds of any mental health service utilization. Although most of the sample was employed, almost half (51%) did not have mental health insurance coverage. Previous research of the association of employment with mental health service use has been contradictory (11), whereas having health insurance coverage has been found to be a strong predictor of service utilization among African Americans in general (6,17,45). Although these factors have been found to be associated with service use among other populations, this study’s results support prior findings that need is, in fact, the strongest predictor of service use (16,37).
Unlike previous literature indicating that higher perceived emotional support was directly related to increased mental health service use (36,46), this study found that perceived emotional support was not significantly associated with service utilization. It is possible that respondents in this sample felt their need for services was mitigated by support from family members and that formal mental health services were no longer required (47). Perceived racial discrimination also was not associated with service use in this population. This finding could be influenced by the respondents’ age (for example, perhaps some have not yet applied for a housing lease or mortgage), or perhaps respondents have not encountered real or perceived racial discrimination in their life experiences or have not attributed a discriminatory event to racism.
These results should be considered in light of several limitations. First, the NSAL has a cross-sectional design that hinders the ability to make causal inferences about the factors that may be related to mental health service utilization in this population. Additional factors that were not asked or were beyond the scope of this study may further affect service use among African-American emerging adults. Second, only individuals who were noninstitutionalized, including college students living on campus, at the time of the survey were interviewed (27). It is possible that institutionalized individuals could provide additional information about service utilization among this population. Third, the smaller subgroup analysis (such as the respondents who sought non–mental health sector providers) led to wide confidence intervals and may have generated unreliable results (48,49). Despite having a large sample size, examination of subsets of service use can have some of the same limitations of smaller studies (27).
Recall (for example, recalling symptomatology or speaking to any professional about a problem) was also an issue with this study. Most responses were retroactive reports that happened more than a year ago, and reliability of the details of the problem or service utilization may be subject to potential recall bias (50–52).
Conclusions
This study’s findings suggest several general conclusions. Additional mental health outreach and education are needed, particularly among male African-American emerging adults. In this sample, men were consistently less likely than women to have utilized services, despite having similar lifetime evaluated need (42% versus 48%, respectively). In addition, only 5% of the sample perceived a need for services. Creative solutions incorporating social media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter (53,54) may be more appropriate avenues than traditional means for improving understanding of mental illness and its symptomatology in this population, particularly given respondents’ age and access to technology.
In addition, research indicates that racial-ethnic and gender matching between client and professional may increase service utilization among male African-American emerging adults (43,55). This information is relevant to primary care physicians and other professionals who are often the first point of contact for this population. It may be necessary to make every effort to match these individuals with a provider who is racially-ethnically similar or male to increase the chances of service utilization and retention.
Similarly, outreach and education need to incorporate individualized and culturally targeted materials (56,57). Targeted materials may be helpful in reducing stigma by normalizing mental illness and providing “real-life” and relevant information specifically related to African-American emerging adults (56,58,59). Finally, it is important to incorporate available informal resources (43) that are already being utilized by this population in order to improve the likelihood of use of more specialized services as needed (31,50,60). Community facilities and businesses, such as churches, beauty salons and barber shops, and community centers, have been effective venues for outreach and services in this population (57,60,61).
African Americans, in general, experience a disproportionate burden related to mental illness (4). More specifically, African-American emerging adults could be adversely affected by cumulative vulnerabilities related to race, social positioning, age, and mental illness, which may further contribute to their being at particular risk for experiencing a poorer quality of life compared with the general population (33). Despite these potentially bleak outcomes, African-American emerging adults often have some of the lowest mental health service utilization rates compared with Caucasian emerging adults as well as older African Americans and older Caucasians (27,28). This study examined predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with mental health service utilization among African-American emerging adults in hopes of enhancing understanding of the relationship between specific predictor variables and service use in this population. Although females and individuals with an evaluated need for services are more likely to utilize services, additional work, both in practice and research, needs to be conducted to increase awareness of mental health symptomatology and service utilization among African-American emerging adults in general, particularly among males and those experiencing mental illness.
Acknowledgments and disclosures
The preparation of this article was supported by grant 5T32MH019960-15 from the Mental Health Services Research Training T32 Fellowship from the National Institute of Mental Health.
The author reports no competing interests.
References
1.
Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al.: Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:617–627, 2005
2.
The Numbers Count: Mental Disorders in America. NIH pub no 06-4584. Rockville, Md, National Institute of Mental Health, 2006
3.
Reeves WC, Strine TW, Pratt LA, et al: Mental illness surveillance among adults in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries 60(suppl 3):1–29, 2011
4.
Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity—A Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service, 2001
5.
Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, et al.: Mental health of college students and their non–college-attending peers: results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 65:1429–1437, 2008
6.
Davis SD, Ford ME: A conceptual model of barriers to mental health services among African Americans. African American Research Perspectives 10:44–54, 2004
7.
Hunt J, Eisenberg D: Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health 46:3–10, 2010
8.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al.: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:593–602, 2005
9.
Snowden LR, Yamada AM: Cultural differences in access to care. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 1:143–166, 2005
10.
Thornicroft G: Stigma and discrimination limit access to mental health care. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 17:14–19, 2008
11.
Ringeisen H, Casanueva CE, Urato M, et al.: Mental health service use during the transition to adulthood for adolescents reported to the child welfare system. Psychiatric Services 60:1084–1091, 2009
12.
Rosenthal B, Wilson WC: Mental health services: use and disparity among diverse college students. Journal of American College Health 57:61–68, 2008
13.
Results From the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. NSDUH series H-36, DHHS pub no SMA 09-4434. Rockville, Md, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, 2009
14.
Tanner JL: Mental Health in Emerging Adulthood: The Changing Spirituality of Emerging Adults Project. Washington, DC, Catholic University of America, Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies, 2010
15.
Chiang L, Hunter CD, Yeh CJ: Coping attitudes, sources, and practices among black and Latino college students. Adolescence 39:793–815, 2004
16.
Alegría M, Canino G, Ríos R, et al.: Inequalities in use of specialty mental health services among Latinos, African Americans, and non-Latino whites. Psychiatric Services 53:1547–1555, 2002
17.
Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Powe NR, et al.: Mental health service utilization by African Americans and whites. Medical Care 37:1034–1045, 1999
18.
Holm-Hansen C: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Children’s Mental Health. St Paul, Minn, Amherst H Wilder Foundation, 2006
19.
Tanner JL, Arnett JJ: The emergence of ‘emerging adulthood’: the new life stage between adolescence and young adulthood; in Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood: New Perspectives and Agendas. Edited by, Furlong A. London, Routledge, 2009
20.
Arnett JJ: Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 55:469–480, 2000
21.
Sly JR, Lewis RK, Roberts SR, et al.: Assessing the health behaviors of African American emerging adults. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 39:333–345, 2011
22.
Breslau J, Kendler KS, Su M, et al.: Lifetime risk and persistence of psychiatric disorders across ethnic groups in the United States. Psychological Medicine 35:317–327, 2005
23.
Williams DR, González HM, Neighbors H, et al.: Prevalence and distribution of major depressive disorder in African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites: results from the National Survey of American Life. Archives of General Psychiatry 64:305–315, 2007
24.
Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust SE: Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Medical Care 45:594–601, 2007
25.
Mowbray CT, Megivern D, Mandiberg JM, et al.: Campus mental health services: recommendations for change. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 76:226–237, 2006
26.
Viner J, Tanner JL: Psychiatric disorders in emerging adulthood. Yellowbrick Journal of Emerging Adulthood 1:6–7, 2009
27.
Jackson JS, Torres M, Caldwell CH, et al.: The National Survey of American Life: a study of racial, ethnic and cultural influences on mental disorders and mental health. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13:196–207, 2004
28.
Kearney LK, Draper M, Baron A: Counseling Utilization by Ethnic Minority Students. Austin, University of Texas at Austin, Counseling and Mental Health Center, 2003
29.
Russell L: Mental Health Care Services in Primary Care: Tackling the Issues in the Context of Health Care Reform. Washington, DC, Center for American Progress, 2010
30.
Carey K: Graduation Rate Watch: Making Minority Student Success a Priority. Washington, DC, Education Sector, 2008
31.
Perl L, Bagalman E, Fernandes-Alcantara AL, et al.: Homelessness: Targeted Federal Programs and Recent Legislation. Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service, 2005
32.
Mays VM, Cochran SD, Barnes NW: Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans. Annual Review of Psychology 58:201–225, 2007
33.
Myers HF, Hwang W: Cumulative psychosocial risks and resilience: a conceptual perspective on ethnic health disparities in late life; in National Research Council (US) Panel on Race, Ethnicity, and Health in Later Life. Edited by, Anderson NB, Bulatao RA, Cohen B. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2004
34.
Gelberg L, Andersen RM, Leake BD: The behavioral model for vulnerable populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people. Health Services Research 34:1273–1302, 2000
35.
Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36:1–10, 1995
36.
Hines-Martin V, Malone M, Kim S, et al.: Barriers to mental health care access in an African American population. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 24:237–256, 2003
37.
Lemming MR, Calsyn RJ: Utility of the behavioral model in predicting service utilization by individuals suffering from severe mental illness and homelessness. Community Mental Health Journal 40:347–364, 2004
38.
Griffith DM, Neighbors HW, Johnson J: Using national data sets to improve the health and mental health of Black Americans: challenges and opportunities. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 15:86–95, 2009
39.
Williams DR, González HM, Williams S, et al.: Perceived discrimination, race and health in South Africa. Social Science and Medicine 67:441–452, 2008
40.
Kessler RC, Abelson J, Demler O, et al.: Clinical calibration of DSM-IV diagnoses in the World Mental Health (WMH) version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMHCIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13:122–139, 2004
41.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, Tex, StataCorp, 2011
42.
Yorgason JB, Linville D, Zitzman B: Mental health among college students: do those who need services know about and use them? Journal of American College Health 57:173–181, 2008
43.
Woodward AT, Taylor RJ, Chatters LM: Use of professional and informal support by black men with mental disorders. Research on Social Work Practice 21:328–336, 2011
44.
Henderson F, Geyen D, Rouce SD, et al.: Mental health service usage by students attending an historically black college/university. Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Research 5, 2007
45.
Snowden LR, Thomas K: Medicaid and African American outpatient mental health treatment. Mental Health Services Research 2:115–120, 2000
46.
Maulik PK, Eaton WW, Bradshaw CP: The role of social network and support in mental health service use: findings from the Baltimore ECA study. Psychiatric Services 60:1222–1229, 2009
47.
Garrido MM, Kane RL, Kaas M, et al.: Perceived need for mental health care among community-dwelling older adults. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 64:704–712, 2009
48.
du Prel JB, Hommel G, Röhrig B, et al.: Confidence interval or p-value? Part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 106:335–339, 2009
49.
Sim J, Reid N: Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. Physical Therapy 79:186–195, 1999
50.
Maulik PK, Mendelson T, Tandon SD: Factors associated with mental health services use among disconnected African-American young adult population. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 38:205–220, 2011
51.
Snowden LR: Racial differences in informal help seeking for mental health problems. Journal of Community Psychology 26:429–438, 1998
52.
Vega WA, Rumbaut RG: Ethnic minorities and mental health. Annual Review of Sociology 17:351–383, 1991
53.
Burns JM, Davenport TA, Durkin LA, et al.: The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people. Medical Journal of Australia 192(suppl):S22–S26, 2010
54.
Hanson C, Thackeray R, Barnes M, et al.: Integrating Web 2.0 in health education preparation and practice. American Journal of Health Education 39:157–166, 2008
55.
Snowden LR, Hu T: Outpatient service use in minority-serving mental health programs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 24:149–159, 1996
56.
Kreuter MW, Lukwago SN, Bucholtz RD, et al.: Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Education and Behavior 30:133–146, 2003
57.
So DW, Gilbert S, Romero S: Help-seeking attitudes among African American college students. College Student Journal 39:806–816, 2005
58.
Cooper LA, Gonzales JJ, Gallo JJ, et al.: The acceptability of treatment for depression among African-American, Hispanic, and white primary care patients. Medical Care 41:479–489, 2003
59.
Thompson VLS, Kalesan B, Wells A, et al.: Comparing the use of evidence and culture in targeted colorectal cancer communication for African Americans. Patient Education and Counseling 81(suppl):S22–S33, 2010
60.
Newhill CE, Harris D: African American consumers’ perceptions of racial disparities in mental health services. Social Work in Public Health 23:107–124, 2007
61.
Snowden LR: Barriers to effective mental health services for African Americans. Mental Health Services Research 3:181–187, 2001
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: Shamrock Ranch, by Peter Hurd, 1962. Watercolor, 12 × 16 inches. New Mexico Museum of Art, Santa Fe. Gift of the family of Edythe C. Mattone, 2005.
History
Published online: 1 October 2014
Published in print: October 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).