A Prescription for “Deprescribing” in Psychiatry
Abstract
The term “deprescribing,” initially coined in geriatric medicine, describes a process of pharmacologic regimen optimization through reduction or cessation of medications for which benefits no longer outweigh risks. Burgeoning rates of polypharmacy, growing appreciation of long-term adverse effects, and a focus on patient-centered practice present specific indications for deprescribing in psychiatry. A strong therapeutic alliance, appropriate timing, and consideration of the meaning of medication for the patient must accompany the following established elements: review of all medications, identification of medications that could be ceased or reduced, collaborative planning of the deprescribing regimen, and provision of review and support to the patient and caregivers. The authors discuss how deprescribing might be adapted for and implemented in psychiatry, identify potential barriers, and make recommendations for future directions.
A term now established in geriatric medicine, “deprescribing” has been defined as the systematic process of identifying and reducing or discontinuing drugs in instances in which existing or potential harms outweigh existing or potential benefits, taking into account the patient’s medical status, current level of functioning, and values and preferences (1). The end goal of deprescribing is not necessarily the complete cessation of medications but rather their parsimonious use. Despite a scattered and disparate literature examining dose reduction or discontinuation of maintenance regimens (mostly notably antipsychotics and benzodiazepines), only recently in psychiatry’s history have general, structured, multidimensional approaches to medication discontinuation gathered momentum. Similarly, the field of cardiology is questioning the need for long-term medications by critically reexamining the evidence base and developing strategies for repeated risk-benefit analyses over time (2).
Changing systems of care, lack of diagnostic and therapeutic precision, and a focus on symptomatic rather than functional outcomes have conspired with a relative lack of clinical evidence for (or experience with) medication discontinuation to increase rates of “prescribing inertia” and polypharmacy. Furthermore, many psychosocial factors, along with comorbid general medical and substance use disorders and the high importance given to the subjective experiences of patients, yield a particularly complex risk-benefit analysis for psychotropic medications. In this Open Forum, we describe how the process of deprescribing might be implemented in psychiatry, along with potential benefits, challenges, and future directions.
Indications for Deprescribing in Psychiatry
Changing Risk-Benefit Ratio
Biological, psychological, and social factors must align to produce a favorable risk-benefit ratio such that a medication regimen becomes established for a patient. Over time, this risk-benefit ratio can change, providing an indication for deprescribing. Certain adverse effects may develop only after longer-term use—for example, tardive dyskinesia with antipsychotics and renal impairment with lithium. Normal aging alters both the pharmacodynamics and the kinetics of medications, increasing vulnerability to side effects. Pregnancy, the development of general medical comorbidities, new medication interactions, and substance abuse raise similar issues. Psychological factors, such as patients’ choice, their understanding of illness and medication, and their coping strategies, may evolve over time, shifting their individual risk-benefit ratio. Social factors, such as geographical relocation, changes in financial and insurance status, and changes in religion, may prompt a reappraisal. The growth of the recovery movement and patient-centered care in psychiatry, including in pharmacological management, further necessitates the development of deprescribing skills.
Nonadherence and Treatment Alliance
Medication nonadherence is a significant and underappreciated issue in all of medicine. Abrupt, unsupervised discontinuation of certain medications risks withdrawal syndromes, rebound effects, and relapse of the underlying condition. Although research has attributed nonadherence to a range of pragmatic as well as treatment-specific factors, the lack of communication between the patient and the prescriber when the patient unilaterally decides to discontinue a medication raises questions of disconnect in the patient-prescriber relationship that are particularly pertinent in psychiatry. Perhaps by showing expertise in collaboration—and a willingness to collaborate—in regard to medication discontinuation from the outset, prescribers may reduce the chances of this disconnect and improve the alliance. Ambivalence about diagnosis and treatment is prevalent in psychiatry, attributable to the relative proximity of disorders to the core sense of self or to direct effects on insight and judgment. Due to the stigma associated with mental illness, which is often heightened by news media coverage, and an initial treatment focus on remission, a patient’s first impression of the psychiatrist may be that of a “pill pusher.” Alternatively, a patient may desire to please the prescriber through continued adherence, which might also generate conflict in regard to treatment. An initial discussion that gives equal weight to deprescribing (when appropriate) as well as prescribing may serve to counter such conflict.
Furthermore, guided by the patient’s preference, collaboration about a trial reduction or discontinuation of a medication, even if unsuccessful, might enhance the therapeutic relationship and the patient’s understanding of the illness and ownership of the medication regimen.
Polypharmacy
Practice guidelines recommend adequate trials of single medications before the addition of a second, but real-world practice differs (3). Medicaid claims data have shown that psychotropic polypharmacy has risen consistently over the past two decades in various states (4,5). Although certain combinations of psychotropics have been shown to be beneficial in “treatment resistant” psychiatric disorders, the stability of the treatment-resistant label over time is unknown. In fact, Stahl and Grady (6) found in their review that most practitioners do not try to discontinue one of the drugs after a combination proves beneficial, even though such discontinuation would establish the true need for the combination. Meanwhile, the risks, especially with increasing age and general medical comorbidities, render the risk-benefit ratio even more disproportionate.
Implementing Deprescribing in Psychiatry
It is imperative that every psychiatrist be able to provide an individualized risk-benefit analysis of each medication for a given patient at a given time point, keeping in mind general medical comorbidities and psychosocial circumstances. Woodward (7) proposed the following five principles of deprescribing in geriatric medicine: review all current medications, identify medications to be targeted for reduction or cessation, plan a deprescribing regimen, plan in partnership with patients and caregivers, and provide frequent review and support. A review of more than ten studies of deprescribing found concordance in these five principles as the crucial elements of the process (8).
Further key considerations for psychiatry may be the timing and context of the change, the patient’s alternative coping strategies, the meaning of the change for the patient, the strength of the treatment alliance, the level of risk, and whether the patient is receiving mandated treatment (see box). Environmental factors that could trigger relapse, including changes in housing, employment, finances, significant relationships, and even season, may need to be considered, along with holidays and anniversaries, in decisions about the timing of a deprescribing intervention. Furthermore, because risk behaviors vary widely among patients, the level of risk should be carefully considered in evaluating a patient for deprescribing. Accordingly, for patients with a history of suicide or homicide attempts, multiple hospitalizations in the recent past, severe relapses after dose reduction, or poor social support, deprescribing should be considered more cautiously (9). In all cases, one would also need to consider whether the patient is under mandated treatment and any expressed wish by the patient to reduce or discontinue medication.
Deprescribing psychotropic medicationsa
Step 1: Choose the right time
•
Avoid times of crisis or acute phase of illness
•
Ensure that the treatment alliance is well established
•
Use caution when the patient is actively abusing substances
Step 2: Compile a list of all the patient’s medications
•
Document dose, route, expected duration, and original indication
•
Document current therapeutic and adverse effects
•
Estimate potential drug-drug interactions and future risk-benefit ratio
Step 3: Initiate the discussion with the patient
•
What is the patient’s knowledge and attitudes about the medications?
•
What is the patient’s perception regarding the benefits and risks of each?
•
Explore the meaning of medication(s) to the patient
Step 4: Introduce deprescribing to the patient
•
Inform the patient about potential indications for and the process of deprescribing
•
Solicit ideas, concerns, and expectations
•
Address any anxieties on the part of the prescriber, patient, family, or clinical care team
•
Get family and caregiver buy-in
Step 5: Identify which medication would be most appropriate for a taper
•
Collaboratively weigh pros and cons of deprescribing each medication
•
Solicit the patient’s preferences
Step 6: Develop a plan
•
Set a start date and rate of taper
•
Is a switch to another medication or formulation indicated?
•
Reinforce alternative biopsychosocial strategies for addressing symptoms
•
Inform the patient about expected and possible discontinuation effects and their timing
•
Agree on a monitoring and follow-up schedule and crisis plan
Step 7: Monitor and adapt, if necessary
•
Adjust rate of taper
•
Treat discontinuation syndrome or relapse
•
Abort or defer deprescribing
aAlthough the entire array of medications taken by a patient needs to be considered for deprescribing, psychiatrists may focus on psychotropic medications and provide the impetus for deprescribing of other medications through coordination with primary care physicians and pharmacists.
Obtaining a complete list of the patient’s medications and discussing the perceived risks and benefits of each medication should be the next step. As noted in geriatric medicine (10), barriers to obtaining a complete medication list include fragmentation of care and a failure to communicate the treatment rationale to the patient. Coordination with the patient’s primary care physician may involve frequent oral communication and sharing of medical records. In generating a priority list of medications to consider for deprescribing, it is essential to ensure that all stakeholders are apprised of the evidence in regard to the risks and benefits of a medication. A medication with a high potential risk and low potential benefit would typically top the priority list. However, with psychotropic medications, we may encounter instances when the ratio is skewed in a particular direction because of a very high or low potential risk or benefit. For instance, although the risk of continuing benztropine in combination with haloperidol for five years might be considered low, the potential benefit is also low (perhaps lower than the risk for a given patient). For patients with multiple general medical comorbidities, a pharmacist’s input on drug interactions and drug prescribing cascades might be invaluable.
Once the medication and tapering have been planned, the decision needs to be discussed with the patient’s treatment team, including visiting nurses, social workers, case managers, and therapists. The patient’s family, if involved, may be a valuable support for the patient. Patients may internalize anxiety experienced by their care providers, and this in itself could trigger psychological symptoms (11). Buy-in by family members and other care providers is therefore crucial, not only to minimize this effect but also to ensure early identification of relapse and avert hospitalization. The prescriber should also consider an additional risk—namely, the patient may interpret the proposal to deprescribe as a message that no treatment is warranted. Before the initiation of a taper, it may be worthwhile to spend several visits exploring the potential meaning of the change and developing an action plan in case symptoms recur and to manage withdrawal symptoms. The plan might include several nonpharmacological measures, such as increasing the frequency of visits to a therapist, developing a Wellness Recovery Action Plan (12), connecting with peer support, and teaching the patient and caregivers to identify early warning signs of illness relapse.
Symptoms of withdrawal from antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anticholinergic agents have been well described in the literature. In psychotic disorders, delineating withdrawal psychoses from a true relapse may be challenging. Similarly, in depressive disorders, many symptoms of withdrawal from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors can be misinterpreted as symptoms of a depressive relapse. As with standard practice in prescribing a new medication, frequent visits during tapering of a medication are advisable. The rate of taper may need to be adjusted depending on the patient’s experience, withdrawal symptoms, recurrence of symptoms, and interim stressors.
Potential Challenges
Arguably, the manner in which a medication is prescribed will determine the ease with which it may be deprescribed, if appropriate. As medication visits become briefer, the focus can potentially shift towards symptoms rather than a deeper, holistic exploration of the illness, which may breed superficial prescribing (that is, transactions of symptom and medication).
Many factors can contribute to anxiety about and resistance toward reducing or discontinuing a psychotropic medication for the psychiatrist, family members, and the patient, including a belief that mental illnesses require lifelong medication treatment and distress related to both signs and symptoms. The prescriber may desire to maintain the status quo once stability has been achieved and may be reluctant to change medications. Furthermore, many long-term side effects are not immediately visible (for example, renal impairment) and may not be accompanied by subjective distress (for example, tardive dyskinesia), and the prescriber may not ask about certain side effects at every visit (for example, sexual side effects). It is not surprising that there is a wealth of clinical evidence for initiating psychiatric medications and little evidence for discontinuing them. Even if psychiatrists wish to deprescribe, the lack of guidelines and data on discontinuation of medications serves as a barrier.
Future Directions
As in the study by Farrell and colleagues (13), discussion by a panel of psychiatrists, primary care physicians, pharmacists, social workers, therapists, and patients may help formulate a consensus hierarchy of medications for deprescribing in psychiatry. Within individual systems of care, multidisciplinary “deprescribing committees” could be modeled on a traditional consultation service. The committees could prepare a report for patients and prescribers that includes a hierarchy of medications that could be reduced or discontinued and a plan to manage emerging issues. It will be essential to develop strategies for closer coordination with primary care physicians so as to implement deprescribing as a general medical strategy (including all the medications that a patient takes) rather than restricting it to psychiatric medications.
Introducing the concept of deprescribing in psychiatric training and generating guidelines based on existing literature are important first steps. Although discontinuation trials exist in psychiatry, further research is indicated to refine the parameters of “good deprescribing” in the biological, psychological, and social domains. Rossello and colleagues (2) have called for a reexamination of long-term prescriptions of many cardiovascular drugs. Similarly, existing data on long-term medication management in psychiatric disorders may need to be reexamined critically with a view to identifying patients for whom deprescribing might be successful. Studies of receptor changes and their correlation with withdrawal symptoms could provide useful data on managing and preventing withdrawal syndromes. The Patient Attitudes Towards Deprescribing Questionnaire (14) has been used in geriatric medicine and could be adapted for psychiatry to measure the acceptability of deprescribing.
Conclusions
In response to a growing awareness of adverse medication effects, the impacts of patients’ changing physiology and psychosocial context, and the benefits of patient-centered practice, the intervention of deprescribing has much to offer psychiatry. For patients who choose to manage their psychiatric illness with fewer or no medications, psychiatrists must be equipped to collaborate in analyzing potential risks and benefits and developing a plan for managing withdrawal symptoms and relapses. Critical review of the existing literature and new research on deprescribing interventions in psychiatry are needed.
References
1.
Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al: Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Internal Medicine 175:827–834, 2015
2.
Rossello X, Pocock SJ, Julian DG: Long-term use of cardiovascular drugs: challenges for research and for patient care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 66:1273–1285, 2015
3.
Faries D, Ascher-Svanum H, Zhu B, et al: Antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotics. BMC Psychiatry 5:26, 2005
4.
Essock SM, Covell NH, Leckman-Westin E, et al: Identifying clinically questionable psychotropic prescribing practices for Medicaid recipients in New York State. Psychiatric Services 60:1595–1602, 2009
5.
Ganguly R, Kotzan JA, Miller LS, et al: Prevalence, trends, and factors associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy among Medicaid-eligible schizophrenia patients, 1998–2000. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65:1377–1388, 2004
6.
Stahl SM, Grady MM: A critical review of atypical antipsychotic utilization: comparing monotherapy with polypharmacy and augmentation. Current Medicinal Chemistry 11:313–327, 2004
7.
Woodward MC: Deprescribing: achieving better health outcomes for older people through reducing medications. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 33:323–328, 2003
8.
Reeve E, Shakib S, Hendrix I, et al: Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence-based, patient-centred deprescribing process. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 78:738–747, 2014
9.
Aderhold V, Stastny P: A Guide to Minimal Use of Neuroleptics: Why and How. Cambridge, Mass, Mad in America, 2015. Available at www.madinamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Guide-to-Minimal-Use-of-Neuroleptics-.pdf
10.
Plakiotis C, Bell JS, Jeon YH, et al: Deprescribing psychotropic medications in aged care facilities: the potential role of family members. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 821:29–43, 2015
11.
Hahn RA: The nocebo phenomenon: concept, evidence, and implications for public health. Preventive Medicine 26:607–611, 1997
12.
Copeland ME: Wellness Recovery Action Plan. Brattleboro, Vt, Peach Press, 1997
13.
Farrell B, Tsang C, Raman-Wilms L, et al: What are priorities for deprescribing for elderly patients? Capturing the voice of practitioners: a modified Delphi process. PLoS ONE 10:e0122246, 2015
14.
Reeve E, Shakib S, Hendrix I, et al: Development and validation of the Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 35:51–56, 2013
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: Dulcimer, probably by Robert Kelly. White wood with walnut, accession #2005.708.1. The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, museum purchase.
History
Received: 31 August 2015
Revision received: 23 November 2015
Accepted: 13 January 2016
Published online: 15 March 2016
Published in print: August 01, 2016
Authors
Funding Information
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).