Skip to main content
Full access
Articles
Published Online: 1 May 2017

Comorbid Chronic General Health Conditions and Depression Care: A Population-Based Analysis

Abstract

Objective:

Untreated depression among persons with chronic general health conditions (chronic health conditions) affects mortality, functional disability, quality of life, and health care costs. Currently, studies of the association between depression care and chronic health conditions report inconsistent results, and studies of depression care among persons with specific health conditions are rare. This study investigated the association between chronic health conditions and the likelihood of receiving depression care among individuals with depression.

Methods:

Retrospective data from physician claims, hospital separations, vital statistics, and insurance plan registries were used to identify a cohort of individuals with depression and track 12-month use of health services among those with and without a chronic health condition. Disparities were analyzed by using generalized linear models.

Results:

Individuals with depression and a chronic health condition had higher use of psychological therapy, higher use of any depression care, greater continuity of care, and better adherence to antidepressant therapy compared with individuals with depression only. However, they were less likely, in general, to be on antidepressant therapy, and individuals with diabetes had fewer visits to general practitioners for a mental health–related reason compared with individuals without diabetes. A trend toward lower use of any depression care was observed among patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Conclusions:

Use of depression care was generally higher among individuals with chronic health conditions, although there were differences in patterns of use by type of health condition. Some patients with specific health conditions could be at risk of being inappropriately treated for depression.
About one in 20 individuals in the general population has major depression (1,2). Among persons with chronic general health conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease, the prevalence of depression is substantially higher, with up to one in five individuals diagnosed as having comorbid depression (3,4). The co-occurrence of depression and chronic general health conditions has generally been attributed to the reciprocal relationship between these conditions (5,6). On the one hand, people with chronic general health conditions (hereafter referred to as “chronic health conditions”) are prone to depression, in part at least because of the stress, pain, discomfort, and limitations on activity that chronic health conditions bring about. Conversely, depression brings about physiological and behavioral changes that increase one’s susceptibility to developing chronic health conditions (7,8). A more recent view also proposes that some forms of depression and chronic health conditions share common etiological pathways, such as childhood abuse or trauma (9).
When depression co-occurs with chronic health conditions, the combination can have serious negative health consequences, such as increased risk of cardiac events after myocardial infarction and increased risk of mortality among those with heart disease (10,11), increased functional disability (1214), and decreased quality of life (15). Indirectly, through its effect on behavior, comorbid depression lowers adherence to treatment regimens (1618) and physical rehabilitation for the chronic health condition (19). At the health system level, the co-occurrence of depression and general health conditions results in higher health care costs (12,20,21).
In the general population, symptoms of depression are managed by using psychological and pharmaceutical therapies or a combination of both (22,23). However, given that chronic health conditions potentially moderate the effectiveness of these treatments, recommendations for treatment of depression among persons with a chronic health condition vary based on the specific condition and on the strength of available evidence (7,24).
Despite the importance of managing depression symptoms and the availability of effective treatments, there is a persistent concern that depression is often untreated or undertreated among individuals with chronic health conditions. In a recent systematic review, 13 of 46 studies reported lower levels of treatment or follow-up care among individuals with depression and chronic health conditions compared with those with depression only (25). One possible reason for undertreatment is related to the difficulty associated with differentiating depression symptoms from those caused by chronic health conditions (26). Another is the common view that depression is a normal response to the stresses brought about by chronic health conditions and that it should go away on its own, over time, or once the chronic health condition has been addressed (8). Compounding these issues are the apprehensions shared by many about potential adverse risks associated with antidepressant therapy when administered in conjunction with medications for chronic health conditions (26,27). These views and challenges, altogether, predispose clinicians and patients to consciously or unconsciously agree on prioritizing the chronic health condition, particularly in primary health care settings, where clinical encounters are brief and where patients with chronic health conditions often have multiple health concerns that compete for the attention of a general practitioner (GP) (28,29).
The presence of chronic health conditions, however, does not consistently result in receipt of lower levels of depression care (25). Studies that have used measures of comorbidity to examine the link between depression care and chronic health conditions suggest that persons with one or more chronic health conditions actually receive higher levels of care (30,31), whereas other researchers have reported that levels of depression care may vary by specific type of chronic health condition (32). This inconsistency in patterns of depression care underscores the importance of conducting further studies, particularly studies that examine specific chronic health conditions. To this end, this study examined depression care patterns among persons with specific chronic health conditions.

Methods

Data Sources

We retrospectively examined health administrative data from virtually everyone in the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC), except for a small percentage (4%) of individuals (aboriginal people, individuals in prison, and police and military personnel) whose health care is covered under federal jurisdiction. Access to the deidentified and individual-level data was granted by the BC Ministry of Health Services and the BC College of Pharmacists and was facilitated and regulated by Population Data BC. Ethics approval was provided by the Behavioral Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia. A list of data sources and description of the data are available in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Sources of data used in the studya
Type and years of dataNameSourcePublisher and date of publicationData fields
Demographic data, 2004–2013bConsolidation File (Medical Services Plan [MSP] Registration and Premium Billing)British Columbia (BC) Ministry of HealthPopulation Data BC, 2014Patient study ID, birth month, birth year, sex, 3-digit postal code (or forward sortation address), neighborhood income quintile, number of days registered in the provincial health services plan
Physician claims, 2004–2013MSP Payment Information FileBC Ministry of HealthPopulation Data BC, 2014Patient study ID, date service was provided, practitioner study ID number, specialty code, service code, fee item codes, service units, amount paid, ICD-9 diagnostic codes
Hospital separations, 2004–2013Discharge Abstract Database (Hospital Separations File)Canadian Institute of Health InformationPopulation Data BC, 2014Patient study ID, discharge or separation date, ICD-10 diagnostic codes
Prescription database, 2004–2013PharmaNetBC Ministry of HealthBC Ministry of Health, 2014Patient study ID, drug ID number, date dispensed, quantity dispensed, and days’ supply
Deaths registry, 2004–2013Vital Statistics DeathsBC Vital Statistics AgencyPopulation Data BC, 2014Patient study ID, year and month of death
a
All data sources are available at http://www.popdata.bc.ca/data.
b
Data excluded health service utilization of a small percentage (4%) of the population whose health care is managed by the federal government (for example, aboriginal people, individuals in prison, and police and military personnel).

Study Cohort

People who received depression diagnoses between January 1 and December 31, 2012, were identified (Table 2). Using the earliest recorded diagnosis as index date, we conducted a review of each individual’s health administrative data to identify major depression, which was indicated by having at least one inpatient or two outpatient depression diagnoses during the previous 12 months. We used the criterion of two outpatient diagnoses to increase the likelihood that an individual actually had depression. For inpatient diagnosis, we used the diagnosis recorded at the time of discharge. Data were available for exactly 12 months before and 12 months after the index period for everyone included in the study cohort. This was done to reduce or eliminate potential biases that could arise when fixed dates are used to ascertain disease status and measure health service use.
TABLE 2. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for ascertaining diagnoses of depression and chronic health conditionsa
ConditionOutpatient diagnosis (ICD-9)Inpatient diagnosis (ICD-10)
Depression296, 296.2x, 296.3x, 311.xF32.x, F33.x, F39.x
Diabetes mellitus250.xE10–E14
Congestive heart failure428.xI50.x
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease491.x, 492.x, 494.x, 496.xJ41.x–J44.x, J47.x
Chronic kidney disease582.x–587.x, 589.xN01.x–N07.x, N18.x, N19.x, N26.x, N27.x
Asthma493.xJ45.x, J46.x
Cerebrovascular disease362.3x, 430.x, 431.x, 433.x–436.xG45.0x–G45.3x, G45.8x, G45.9x, H34.1x, I60.x–I64.x
Ischemic heart disease410.x, 413.x, 414.xI20.x, I21.x, I25.x
a
In British Columbia, Canada, ICD-9 codes are used to record diagnoses in physician claims, whereas ICD-10 codes are used to record hospital diagnoses. A diagnosis of depression or a chronic health condition was indicated by having at least one inpatient or two outpatient diagnoses of that condition during the previous 12 months.
The presence of chronic health conditions was assessed in a similar manner.
We excluded individuals with incomplete follow-up, such as individuals who moved in and out of the province or who died at any point during the observation period. Persons under 19 years of age were also excluded to restrict the analysis to the adult population.

Outcome Variables

We examined a number of outcome variables to assess and compare the 12-month use of depression-related health services among those with and without chronic health conditions. We derived binary indicators (yes or no) of whether patients received counseling/psychotherapy, antidepressant therapy, and either counseling/psychotherapy or antidepressant therapy. We created discrete variables that summarize counts of GP visits overall, GP mental health visits, and counseling/psychotherapy sessions. Claims for GP visits can have up to five diagnoses, with the primary diagnosis listed as the first diagnosis. The identification of GP mental health visits was made by using the primary diagnosis only. We also calculated a continuous variable for GP continuity of care, which measures the degree to which GP visits were made to the same physician; scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 1 (33). Last, we calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) for antidepressant therapy, which is another continuous variable that quantifies the extent to which individuals were on antidepressants within 180- and 365-day periods. PDC was calculated by creating time arrays that reflect the dates encompassed by each fill and summing up only those days that were covered by antidepressants and dividing them by 180 or 365. Values for this variable range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating good adherence (34,35).

Explanatory Variables

The main explanatory variable used in this analysis was the presence of the following chronic health conditions: diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), asthma, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and ischemic heart disease. These chronic health conditions were chosen because in the past decade they have been the target of primary health care reforms in BC (36). Algorithms for detecting these conditions by using health administrative data were adopted from a previously completed study (37).

Analysis

We summarized the demographic characteristics and patterns of health service use of the study cohort by using counts, percentages, and means and standard deviations. We used generalized linear models (logistic, negative binomial, and log normal) to determine whether persons with chronic health conditions were more or less likely to receive various types of health services relative to persons without chronic health conditions. The models were run for each chronic health condition with the absence of the condition as the reference category (for example, patients with diabetes versus patients without diabetes). Separate models with an overall indicator of chronic health condition were also fitted to determine whether having at least one of the seven chronic health conditions was associated with lower or higher use of health services compared with having none of the chronic health conditions. All models were adjusted for sex, age, income, and place of residence.
We used SAS/SQL software, version 9.4, to link and manage multiple databases and Stata, version 13.1, to generate the model results.

Results

A total of 105,476 individuals with existing depression were identified in 2012. The prevalence of depression was disproportionately high among women, middle-aged individuals, and individuals who lived in low-income or urban areas (Table 3).
TABLE 3. Use of therapies for depression in the past 12 months among 105,476 patients, by demographic characteristic, income, and comorbid chronic health condition
 Proportion of days covereda
 TotalCounseling/psychotherapyAntidepressantsCounseling/psychotherapy or antidepressantsCounseling/psychotherapy and antidepressantsN of counseling/psychotherapy sessions180 days365 days
CharacteristicNCol. %NRow %NRow %NRow %NRow %MSDMSDMSD
Total105,476100.062,87959.680,47576.396,24691.247,10844.73.26.0.81.25.76.29
Sex                
 Women70,16566.541,68359.454,83478.264,47791.932,04045.73.26.0.81.24.77.28
 Men35,30533.521,19360.025,63872.631,76490.015,06742.73.35.9.80.26.74.30
 Missing6.0350.0350.0583.3116.74.87.0.99.02.99.02
Age group                
 19–256,2495.93,96963.54,37570.05,61989.92,72543.63.46.4.71.28.62.32
 26–3515,56414.89,49161.011,24072.213,99589.96,73643.33.15.6.76.27.69.31
 36–4521,24220.112,61959.416,06375.619,35491.19,32843.93.26.2.79.25.73.29
 46–5526,68425.316,04660.120,76277.824,47491.712,33446.23.46.3.82.24.77.28
 56–6521,19120.112,71060.016,74179.019,63692.79,81546.33.46.0.84.23.80.26
 66–758,6298.24,98157.76,81178.97,95692.23,83644.53.05.4.85.23.82.26
 >755,9175.63,06351.84,48375.85,21288.12,33439.42.34.7.85.23.82.26
Income quintile                
 Lowest23,60822.414,34,460.817,48474.121,32790.310,50144.53.36.0.80.25.75.29
 Second21,33620.212,80,160.016,29076.319,48291.39,60945.03.25.7.80.25.75.29
 Third20,41119.412,01,658.915,71977.018,62991.39,10644.63.15.7.81.25.76.28
 Fourth19,46818.51141858.715,11,177.617,87991.88,65044.43.26.1.81.24.76.28
 Highest17,96117.010,72359.713,94577.616,53792.18,13145.33.36.4.81.25.76.28
 Missing2,6922.61,57758.61,92671.52,39288.91,11141.33.05.8.79.25.73.29
Residence                
 Rural9,9989.55,55855.67,80378.09,13491.44,22742.32.54.3.81.24.77.28
 Urban85,35980.951,52560.464,87576.077,88991.238,51145.13.46.3.81.25.75.29
 Missing10,1199.65,79657.37,79777.19,22391.14,37043.22.54.6.81.25.76.28
Comorbid chronic health conditionb                
 Diabetes7,1806.84,98169.45,47776.36,64492.53,81453.14.36.9.84.23.81.26
 CHF837.852362.563676.075289.840748.62.84.5.85.22.82.26
 COPD2,0912.01,34764.41,62077.51,93892.71,02949.23.05.0.84.24.81.27
 CKD921.961967.269675.686493.845149.03.96.0.86.23.82.26
 Asthma1,9821.91,29865.51,51876.61,83592.698149.53.86.5.80.26.76.29
 CVD815.847358.061875.872589.036644.93.25.8.85.23.82.26
 IHD1,9931.91,31666.01,52876.71,82691.61,01851.13.86.2.82.24.79.28
 None92,14787.453,99858.670,30376.383,96591.140,33643.83.15.9.80.25.75.29
 ≥113,32912.68,88166.610,17276.312,28192.16,77250.83.86.3.84.24.80.27
a
Days of antidepressant use for a 180- and 365-day period
b
CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease

Psychological, Antidepressant, and Combination Therapy

Around 91% of the cohort received either psychological (counseling/psychotherapy) or antidepressant therapy, with antidepressant therapy being the modal treatment (Table 3). Less than half (45%) of the cohort received both counseling/psychotherapy and antidepressant therapy. A higher proportion (78%) of women were treated with antidepressant therapy compared with men (73%), whereas a slightly higher proportion of men (60%) received counseling/psychotherapy compared with women (59%). Similarly, a higher proportion of rural residents (78%) were treated with antidepressant therapy compared with urban residents (76%), whereas a higher proportion of urban residents (60%) were treated with counseling/psychotherapy compared with rural residents (56%).
Overall, the proportion of individuals who received counseling/psychotherapy was higher among persons with one or more chronic health conditions compared with those without a chronic health condition, whereas the proportion of persons who received antidepressant therapy was the same regardless of the presence of chronic health conditions. This general pattern of use, however, was not evident among persons with CVD—the proportion of individuals with CVD who received counseling/psychotherapy was lower than for any other chronic health condition and lower than for persons with no chronic health conditions.
Results from the fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression models showed similar trends (Table 4). In general, persons with chronic health conditions other than CVD had higher odds of receiving counseling/psychotherapy compared with persons without the same condition. However, persons with chronic health conditions had similar or lower odds of using antidepressant therapy compared with persons without chronic health conditions. A trend was found toward lower odds of receiving any depression care (counseling/psychotherapy or antidepressant therapy) among those with CVD compared with those without CVD.
TABLE 4. Odds of receipt of depression care and other outcomes in the past 12 months among patients with a comorbid chronic health conditiona
 Chronic health condition
 DiabetesCHFCOPDCKDAsthmaCVDIHD≥1
OutcomeRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CIRatio95% CI
Depression care                
 Counseling/ psychotherapy1.671.58–1.761.321.14–1.521.331.22–1.461.521.32–1.751.291.17–1.421.04.91–1.201.431.30–1.581.531.47–1.60
 Antidepressants.95.89–1.00.96.81–1.131.00.90–1.12.92.79–1.071.00.90–1.11.94.80–1.11.99.89–1.10.95.91–.99
 Counseling/ psychotherapy or antidepressants1.201.09–1.31.95.76–1.201.241.05–1.461.531.17–2.011.191.00–1.41.83.66–1.041.08.92–1.271.161.08–1.25
Proportion of days coveredb                
 180 days1.021.01–1.031.02.99–1.041.00.99–1.021.031.01–1.05.99.98–1.011.02.99–1.04.99.97–1.001.011.01–1.02
 365 days1.031.02–1.041.021.00–1.051.021.00–1.031.031.00–1.061.00.98–1.021.031.00–1.051.00.98–1.011.021.02–1.03
N of GP mental health visits.89.86–.91.95.88–1.031.211.15–1.27.96.89–1.041.221.16–1.281.02.94–1.10.96.91–1.01.98.96–1.01
N of counseling sessions1.371.33–1.41.98.91–1.07.99.94–1.041.271.18–1.361.201.14–1.261.081.00–1.171.221.16–1.281.271.24–1.30
Continuity of carec                
 All GP visits1.051.05–1.061.051.03–1.071.031.01–1.041.031.01–1.051.021.01–1.041.021.00–1.041.031.01–1.041.041.04–1.05
 GP mental health visits1.031.02–1.041.02.98–1.051.01.99–1.031.02.99–1.061.00.98–1.021.041.00–1.071.021.00–1.041.031.02–1.04
a
The reference group for all these coefficients is people who did not have a comorbid chronic health condition. All reported regression coefficients except for depression care pertain to ratios of means; values for depression care represent odds ratios. The regression coefficients were generated by using logistic regression for depression care, negative binomial regression for general practitioner (GP) mental health visits and counseling sessions, and log normal regression for proportion of days covered and continuity of care. Coefficients with 95% CIs that do not cross the value of 1.00 are significant (p<.05). CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease
b
Days of antidepressant use for a 180- and 365-day period
c
The continuity of care index measures the degree to which GP visits were made to the same physician.

GP Visits and GP Continuity of Care

On average, members of the study cohort visited their GPs about 12 times a year for any reason, and about four times a year specifically for mental health reasons (Table 5). The mean continuity of care index was higher (.80) for GP mental health visits than for any GP visits (.73). In terms of sociodemographic characteristics, women and older individuals had a slightly higher mean number of GP visits overall but a lower mean number of GP mental health visits compared with men and younger individuals, respectively. Compared with younger individuals, those over age 75 had the lowest mean number of GP mental health visits but the highest level of continuity of care for mental health.
TABLE 5. Visits to general practitioners (GPs) for all reasons and for mental health reasons and continuity of care during the past 12 months among patients with depression
 Continuity of care indexa
 All visitsMental health visitsAll visitsMental health visits
CharacteristicMSDMSDMSDMSD
Total11.6211.464.177.44.73.24.80.28
Sex        
 Women11.7110.563.886.14.73.23.80.27
 Men11.4312.944.769.29.74.25.79.29
 Missing76.00140.6061.33146.82.81.16.87.16
Age group        
 19–2510.1611.134.457.94.59.27.70.32
 26–3511.7513.655.2710.33.64.27.72.31
 36–4511.1512.164.778.73.70.25.77.29
 46–5511.1711.024.197.12.75.23.81.27
 56–6511.169.813.485.23.79.20.84.24
 66–7512.899.783.003.67.82.18.86.23
 >7516.2911.393.013.28.85.15.90.20
Income quintile        
 Lowest13.1813.634.989.64.74.24.79.28
 Second12.0511.664.217.35.73.24.79.28
 Third11.2610.763.996.68.74.24.80.28
 Fourth10.639.943.715.97.74.24.80.28
 Highest10.6010.033.756.21.73.24.80.28
 Missing11.2011.814.368.10.70.26.75.30
Residence        
 Rural11.7111.003.976.64.73.24.79.28
 Urban11.6511.654.257.72.74.24.80.28
 Missing11.2510.233.745.58.73.23.78.27
Comorbid chronic health conditionb        
 Diabetes15.7612.623.447.05.82.18.85.24
 CHF21.9715.653.235.23.85.14.87.23
 COPD19.3417.644.5811.26.81.18.85.23
 CKD18.3214.673.546.39.82.18.86.24
 Asthma18.8118.885.2911.87.75.22.80.28
 CVD18.0016.053.585.69.82.18.88.23
 IHD17.4615.823.699.85.81.18.85.24
 None10.9210.944.237.47.72.24.79.28
 ≥116.4713.633.787.21.80.19.84.24
a
The continuity of care index measures the degree to which GP visits were made to the same physician; scores range from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 1.
b
CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease
Compared with individuals with no chronic health conditions, individuals with one or more chronic health conditions had generally lower numbers of GP mental health visits (Table 5). All continuity of care indices were higher among persons with chronic health conditions compared with individuals with no chronic health conditions.
Results from the fully adjusted multivariable regression analyses suggest that the number of mental health GP visits varied by chronic health condition (Table 4). Specifically, the number of mental health GP visits was higher among those with COPD and asthma and lower among those with diabetes. Overall, having one or more chronic health conditions was not associated with a higher number of GP visits for mental health reasons.
Continuity of care, for GP visits and GP mental health visits, remained marginally higher among those with chronic health conditions, even after adjustment for differences in sociodemographic variables by using multivariable regression analysis (Table 4).

Number of Counseling or Psychotherapy Sessions

On average, cohort members received about three counseling/psychotherapy sessions in a year, except those who resided in rural areas or those who were over 75 years of age, who received fewer (Table 3). The mean number of counseling/psychotherapy sessions was generally higher among those with chronic health conditions compared with no chronic health conditions, except among individuals with CHF or COPD.
Adjusted results from the multivariable regression models showed the same general pattern of having a higher number of counseling/psychotherapy sessions among those with one or more chronic health conditions compared with those without a chronic health condition (Table 4).

Comparison of PDC

The mean PDC for the cohort was .81 for the 180-day period and .76 for the 365-day period. Younger individuals had lower PDCs than older individuals (Table 3).
Individuals with chronic health conditions had slightly higher PDCs than individuals without chronic health conditions. Results from the multivariable regression analyses indicated that the relative differences between the PDCs of individuals with and without a chronic health condition were small in magnitude (Table 4).

Discussion

We compared health service use among patients diagnosed as having major depression and a chronic health condition and patients diagnosed as having major depression only. Our results indicate that, in general, the individuals with chronic health conditions received higher levels of mental health care for all outcome variables except antidepressant therapy and GP mental health visits. Furthermore, our results suggest a trend toward lower use of depression-related health care among the patients with CVD.
Because we are unaware of studies that looked at GP continuity of care and GP mental health visits among individuals with depression and chronic health conditions, we are unable to compare our results with those of previous studies. However, our results are similar to studies that found positive associations between having one or more chronic health conditions and number of psychological therapy sessions (30,31) and likelihood of receiving any type of depression care (30,31,38).
Our finding about the lower odds of being on antidepressant therapy among individuals with chronic health conditions contradicts studies that report associations in the opposite direction (39,40). The incongruence with previous reports is probably because our cohort comprised prevalent cases of depression only. In studies that examined prevalent depression cases (individuals who have received previous depression treatment), antidepressant therapy has been reported to be less likely among individuals with chronic health conditions (25,41).
Our results underscore the utility of studying specific chronic health conditions when examining differences in depression care. Restricting the analysis to counts or presence of chronic health conditions would never have revealed the trend toward lower odds of receiving counseling/psychotherapy or antidepressant therapy among patients with CVD. Also we would have never found out that persons with comorbid diabetes have relatively fewer GP mental health visits.
The results suggesting that individuals with specific chronic health conditions have lower levels of health service use raise important questions about whether these individuals are receiving other depression care. It is worth examining, for example, whether individuals with CVD and depression have access to other forms of depression care, given that they tended to be less likely to receive antidepressant therapy or counseling/psychotherapy. As well, it is important to investigate whether this reduced level of health service use results in increased mortality, lower quality of life, or other adverse consequences.
Future investigations should also be directed toward identifying the most likely cause of the lower rates of mental health GP visits among those with comorbid diabetes compared with individuals without diabetes. It could be that GPs choose to manage depression among patients with diabetes by providing antidepressant therapy or by referring patients to mental health professionals for counseling/psychotherapy. If this is the case, it is possible that GPs no longer feel that further follow-up visits for mental health reasons are necessary. On the contrary, GPs may not see any need at all to treat depression that co-occurs with diabetes, which is clearly an indication of poor quality of care, given that untreated depression is associated with poor adherence to diabetes treatment (16) and poor overall functioning (14).
We note, however, that lower levels of use of treatment do not always mean poor quality of care. Case in point is the trend toward lower odds of antidepressant use among patients with CKD or CVD. Because of potential adverse drug interactions, practice guidelines emphasize caution in the use of antidepressant therapy among individuals with chronic health conditions (7,24). In some conditions, such as CVD, the risk-benefit ratio associated with antidepressant therapy remains arguable (27,42). It could be that the lower odds of antidepressant use among these patients reflect clinicians’ mindfulness of the cautionary notes provided in practice guidelines. Future analyses should help determine the magnitude of adverse events that were prevented, if any, by the relatively lower odds of antidepressant use in this segment of the patient population.
Finally, we note the generally good level of adherence to antidepressant therapy, as suggested by a mean PDC of .80 or higher and the absence of a big disparity between the PDCs for those with and without a chronic health condition. These results could be accounted for partly by public coverage for prescriptions in BC, given that adherence to antidepressant therapy among individuals with government-assisted access to prescriptions has been shown to be good (43,44).
Some limitations need to be acknowledged when considering our results. First, only services rendered by GPs or specialists were examined because services provided by those without medical degrees are not publicly covered in Canada and, consequently, were not captured in our databases. Second, our measures of antidepressant use and adherence were based on refills, which could underestimate prescribing practices and overestimate actual use. Third, we were unable to assess the quality of psychological therapies that were provided because of the absence of relevant details in the claims data we examined. Fourth, we were not able to adjust for differences in depression severity because we did not have data that can be used to account for such differences. Fifth, the comparison group we examined pertains only to individuals without the chronic health conditions we examined. It is possible that our comparison group had other chronic health conditions that could have influenced their use of mental health services. Future studies should therefore examine whether excluding persons with other key chronic health conditions from the comparison group yields different results. Last, our analysis included only those with primary diagnoses of depression and chronic health conditions and excluded those with subthreshold, undiagnosed, or secondary diagnoses of depression. Our findings may not be generalizable to persons with undiagnosed or subthreshold depression.

Conclusions

On most measures, individuals with prevalent depression and one or more of the seven chronic health conditions we examined were more likely than persons with depression alone to receive mental health care. These individuals were more likely to receive any psychological therapy, received a greater number of psychological therapy sessions, were more likely to receive any depression treatment, and had higher levels of continuity of care for GP visits and GP mental health visits. These same individuals appeared to be less likely to use antidepressant therapy, but among patients on antidepressant therapy, adherence was generally similar—or even slightly higher for some conditions—among patients with and without a chronic health condition. When designing interventions and policies for treatment of depression among persons with chronic health conditions, it is important to examine specific conditions because global measures of comorbidity may fail to reveal areas in which important disparities persist.

Footnotes

Dr. Puyat was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Banting and Best Doctoral Research Award and a UBC Four-Year Fellowship Award. Permission to use the linked health administrative data was granted by the British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Health Data Stewardship Committee and BC Vital Statistics Agency. Data access was facilitated by Population Data BC.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of any of the agencies mentioned.

References

1.
Pearson C, Janz T, Ali J: Mental and Substance Use Disorders in Canada. Ottawa, Statistics Canada. 2013. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-624-x/2013001/article/11855-eng.htm. Accessed Jan 17, 2014
2.
Hedden SL, Kennet J, Lipari R, et al: Behavioral Health Trends in the United States: Results From the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2015. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FRR1-2014/NSDUH-FRR1-2014.htm#idtextanchor079
3.
Johnson B, Eiser C, Young V, et al: Prevalence of depression among young people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine 30:199–208, 2013
4.
Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, et al: Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21:30–38, 2006
5.
Katon WJ: Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 13:7–23, 2011
6.
Katon WJ: Clinical and health services relationships between major depression, depressive symptoms, and general medical illness. Biological Psychiatry 54:216–226, 2003
7.
Ramasubbu R, Taylor VH, Samaan Z, et al: The Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and select comorbid medical conditions. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 24:91–109, 2012
8.
Lichtman JH, Bigger JT Jr, Blumenthal JA, et al: Depression and coronary heart disease: recommendations for screening, referral, and treatment: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association. Circulation 118:1768–1775, 2008
9.
Lesage A: Heuristic model of depressive disorders as systemic chronic disease. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 24:309–311, 2015
10.
Barth J, Schumacher M, Herrmann-Lingen C: Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine 66:802–813, 2004
11.
van Melle JP, de Jonge P, Spijkerman TA, et al: Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine 66:814–822, 2004
12.
Stein MB, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, et al: Does co-morbid depressive illness magnify the impact of chronic physical illness? A population-based perspective. Psychological Medicine 36:587–596, 2006
13.
Schmitz N, Wang J, Malla A, et al: Joint effect of depression and chronic conditions on disability: results from a population-based study. Psychosomatic Medicine 69:332–338, 2007
14.
Schmitz N, Gariépy G, Smith KJ, et al.: Longitudinal relationships between depression and functioning in people with type 2 diabetes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 47:172–179, 2014
15.
Stafford L, Berk M, Reddy P, et al: Comorbid depression and health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 62:401–410, 2007
16.
Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, et al: Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 31:2398–2403, 2008
17.
Gehi A, Haas D, Pipkin S, et al: Depression and medication adherence in outpatients with coronary heart disease: findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Archives of Internal Medicine 165:2508–2513, 2005
18.
Rieckmann N, Kronish IM, Haas D, et al: Persistent depressive symptoms lower aspirin adherence after acute coronary syndromes. American Heart Journal 152:922–927, 2006
19.
Ziegelstein RC, Fauerbach JA, Stevens SS, et al: Patients with depression are less likely to follow recommendations to reduce cardiac risk during recovery from a myocardial infarction. Archives of Internal Medicine 160:1818–1823, 2000
20.
Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Gravel G, et al: Depression and health-care costs during the first year following myocardial infarction. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 48:471–478, 2000
21.
Simon GE, Katon WJ, Lin EHB, et al: Diabetes complications and depression as predictors of health service costs. General Hospital Psychiatry 27:344–351, 2005
22.
Parikh SV, Segal ZV, Grigoriadis S, et al: Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults: II. psychotherapy alone or in combination with antidepressant medication. Journal of Affective Disorders 117(suppl 1):S15–S25, 2009
23.
Lam RW, Kennedy SH, Grigoriadis S, et al: Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults: III. pharmacotherapy. Journal of Affective Disorders 117(suppl 1):S26–S43, 2009
24.
Depression in Adults With Chronic Physical Health Problem: Recognition and Management. London, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2009. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg91
25.
Menear M, Doré I, Cloutier A-M, et al: Chronic physical comorbidity burden and the quality of depression treatment in primary care: a systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78:314–323, 2015
26.
Kravitz RL, Ford DE: Introduction: chronic medical conditions and depression—the view from primary care. American Journal of Medicine 121(suppl 2):S1–S7, 2008
27.
Hackett ML, Anderson CS, House A, et al: Interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4:CD003437, 2008
28.
Klinkman MS: Competing demands in psychosocial care: a model for the identification and treatment of depressive disorders in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry 19:98–111, 1997
29.
Nutting PA, Rost K, Smith J, et al: Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over 6 months. Archives of Family Medicine 9:1059–1064, 2000
30.
Puyat JH, Kazanjian A, Goldner EM, et al: How often do individuals with major depression receive minimally adequate treatment? A population-based, data linkage study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 61:394–404, 2016
31.
Duhoux A, Fournier L, Nguyen CT, et al: Guideline concordance of treatment for depressive disorders in Canada. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44:385–392, 2009
32.
Nuyen J, Spreeuwenberg PM, Van Dijk L, et al: The influence of specific chronic somatic conditions on the care for co-morbid depression in general practice. Psychological Medicine 38:265–277, 2008
33.
Magill MK, Senf J: A new method for measuring continuity of care in family practice residencies. Journal of Family Practice 24:165–168, 1987
34.
Jones LE, Turvey C, Carney-Doebbeling C: Inadequate follow-up care for depression and its impact on antidepressant treatment duration among veterans with and without diabetes mellitus in the Veterans Health Administration. General Hospital Psychiatry 28:465–474, 2006
35.
Sikka R, Xia F, Aubert RE: Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data. American Journal of Managed Care 11:449–457, 2005
36.
Cavers WJR, Tregillus VHF, Micco A, et al: Transforming family practice in British Columbia. Canadian Family Physician 56:1318–1321, 2010
37.
Lavergne M, Law MR, Peterson S, et al: A population-based analysis of incentive payments to primary care physicians for the care of patients with complex disease. Canadian Medical Association Journal 188:E375–E383, 2016
38.
Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al: Depression treatment in a sample of 1,801 depressed older adults in primary care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51:505–514, 2003
39.
Kurdyak PA, Gnam WH: Medication management of depression: the impact of comorbid chronic medical conditions. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 57:565–571, 2004
40.
Koike AK, Unützer J, Wells KB: Improving the care for depression in patients with comorbid medical illness. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:1738–1745, 2002
41.
Gill JM, Chen YX, Lieberman MI: Management of depression in ambulatory care for patients with medical co-morbidities: a study from a national electronic health record (EHR) network. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 38:203–215, 2008
42.
Chen Y, Guo JJ, Zhan S, et al: Treatment effects of antidepressants in patients with post-stroke depression: a meta-analysis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 40:2115–2122, 2006
43.
Kennedy J, Tuleu I, Mackay K: Unfilled prescriptions of Medicare beneficiaries: prevalence, reasons, and types of medicines prescribed. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 14:553–560, 2008
44.
Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Edlund MJ, et al: Reasons for antidepressant nonadherence among veterans treated in primary care clinics. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 72:827–834, 2011

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services

Cover: Glowing Night, by Oscar Bluemner, 1924. Watercolor and pencil on paper. Bequest of Charles F. Ikle, 1963. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. Image source: Art Resource, New York City.

Psychiatric Services
Pages: 907 - 915
PubMed: 28457213

History

Received: 5 July 2016
Revision received: 30 November 2016
Revision received: 23 January 2017
Accepted: 17 February 2017
Published online: 1 May 2017
Published in print: September 01, 2017

Keywords

  1. Quality of care, Utilization patterns &amp
  2. review, Depression, Chronic Disease, Comorbid

Authors

Details

Joseph H. Puyat, M.Sc., Ph.D. [email protected]
Dr. Puyat and Dr. Wong are with the Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. They are also with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, where Dr. Kazanjian is affiliated. Dr. Goldner, who passed away on November 27, 2016, was with the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, at the time that this research was conducted.
Arminee Kazanjian, Dr.Soc.
Dr. Puyat and Dr. Wong are with the Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. They are also with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, where Dr. Kazanjian is affiliated. Dr. Goldner, who passed away on November 27, 2016, was with the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, at the time that this research was conducted.
Hubert Wong, Ph.D.
Dr. Puyat and Dr. Wong are with the Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. They are also with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, where Dr. Kazanjian is affiliated. Dr. Goldner, who passed away on November 27, 2016, was with the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, at the time that this research was conducted.
Elliot Goldner, M.D., M.H.Sc.
Dr. Puyat and Dr. Wong are with the Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. They are also with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, where Dr. Kazanjian is affiliated. Dr. Goldner, who passed away on November 27, 2016, was with the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, at the time that this research was conducted.

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Puyat (e-mail: [email protected]).

Competing Interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Funding Information

Institute of Health Services and Policy Research10.13039/501100000037: Doctoral Research Award

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share