Enhanced Primary Care Treatment of Behavioral Disorders With ECHO Case-Based Learning
Abstract
The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model offers a way for primary care providers to develop expertise in addressing behavioral health issues of primary care patients. It provides an alternative to traditional continuing medical education (CME) for ongoing training and support for health care providers. ECHO uses videoconferencing to connect multiple primary care teams simultaneously with academic specialists and builds capacity via mentorship and case-based learning. ECHO aims to expand access to care by developing capacity to treat common, complex conditions in underserved areas. Participants in an integrated addictions and psychiatry teleECHO program reported that when they presented a patient case, the feedback they received was highly valuable and led them to change their care plans more than 75% of the time. ECHO is an effective model for teaching primary care teams about behavioral health and may be more effective than traditional CME approaches.
Continuing medical education (CME) programs are the prevailing approach to enhancing primary care providers’ (PCPs’) knowledge in treating mental health and substance use disorders. Many patients seen in the primary care setting have both types of behavioral disorder, yet PCPs receive little training regarding these conditions and often report having insufficient access to specialty care (1,2). Inadequate treatment of behavioral disorders results in unnecessary suffering and multiple social and monetary costs to the individual and to society (3).
CME aims to teach PCPs about new discoveries and best practices and to promote the uptake of this information into clinical practices. Moore and colleagues (4) have described seven levels of possible CME outcomes. Levels 1 and 2 involve participation and satisfaction; levels 3 and 4 address learning. In order to achieve level 5, knowledge obtained in a CME activity must lead to improved clinical performance, demonstrated objectively or through self-report. Levels 6 and 7 require evidence of change in patient health and population health. Translation from CME program participation to incorporation into clinical practice—outcome level 5—appears to occur rarely, however, and there is concern that CME alone may be not be optimally effective in prompting practice change (5–7).
This breakdown in the translation of new learning into practice change results partly from the passive nature of the learning that occurs in most CME venues (5). Many CME programs are delivered as formal lectures through conferences or Webinars, in which participation is primarily passive.
CME programs, while efficient in delivering current information, also do not adhere to the principles of adult learning theory originally explicated by Knowles and others (8,9), which hold that adults will learn only what they need to learn, their learning is primarily problem based rather than subject based, they have a rich reservoir of experience to inform their learning, they learn best in informal settings, and they want guidance rather than instruction.
The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model (https://echo.unm.edu) provides an alternative approach to ongoing training for health care providers. ECHO uses videoconferencing to simultaneously connect multiple primary care teams with academic specialists (teleECHO programs) and builds teams’ capacity via mentorship and, most important, case-based learning (10). ECHO aims to expand access to care by developing capacity to treat common, complex conditions in rural and underserved areas.
Growing evidence supports the effectiveness of the ECHO model (11). Participating health care providers become more confident in their ability to deliver care for the condition that is the focus of the teleECHO program (12). Care delivered by PCPs treating hepatitis C has been shown to be as effective as care delivered by academic specialists when the PCPs are supported through a hepatitis C teleECHO program (13). Nursing homes supported by a geriatric teleECHO program reduced the use of physical and chemical restraints (14).
The integrated addictions and psychiatry (IAP) teleECHO program was established in New Mexico in 2005 with implementation of the ECHO model to expand access to treatment for behavioral disorders (10). Each week, primary care teams join via a two-hour videoconference with a “hub” specialist team at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center that includes an addiction specialist/internist, psychiatrist, licensed clinical social worker, and community health worker. The primary care clinic “spoke” participants include interdisciplinary clinical team members. Participation is free of charge, and learners may request no-cost continuing education credits (CME/CEU).
The IAP teleECHO sessions begin with a specialist offering a brief lecture on some aspect of mental health or substance use disorder care. The remainder of the session focuses on case presentations by participants who submit a deidentified description of a patient’s case in advance on a standard template and give a brief oral presentation during the teleECHO session. After the presentation, the facilitator elicits clarifying questions from participants and specialists. The facilitator next asks for discussion and recommendations, starting with other participants and then specialists. The facilitator summarizes the group’s input. TeleECHO sessions typically include two to five cases.
Participants who choose to claim CME/CEU credits complete an electronic survey after the teleECHO session. Beginning in June 2015, survey participants were asked if they had presented a patient case that day; how they rate the value of the clinical input received; whether the input changed their care plan, and if so, in what way; whether they learned something new from discussions of cases presented by other participants; and whether this information would be useful in caring for their own patients, and if so, in what way. Results were tabulated and frequencies calculated.
From June 2015 to May 2016, 104 individuals from five states and Canada participated. They came from community health centers, private clinics, and public health offices; departments of corrections and defense; the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; Navajo, Zuni, and Cherokee nations; public schools; academic medical centers; and specialty addiction treatment programs. They included physicians, nurses and advanced practice nurses, physician assistants, counselors and social workers, pharmacists, psychologists, public health officers, midwives, community health workers, medical assistants, and trainees.
Forty-one individuals seeking CME/CEU credit submitted 299 postsession surveys. In 84 of these surveys, respondents reported presenting a patient case, and 65 (77%) stated that the case discussion changed their patient care plan. In 70 of 81 surveys (86%), participants rated the value of the input they received as 5 (the best possible) on a scale of 1–5. In addition, 254 of 295 surveys (86%) indicated that respondents learned something new from cases presented by others, and 231 of 249 (93%) reported that the information they learned would be useful in caring for their own patients. (The denominator varies because not all respondents answered every question.)
Participants reported that they learned new knowledge related to diagnosis, behavioral and medical interventions, and resources outside of their practice (Box). They also reported acquiring broader knowledge, such as self-awareness in patient interactions and the need to reduce stigma in the care of their patients.
WHAT PARTICIPANTS LEARNED FROM PATIENT CASE DISCUSSIONS IN THE INTEGRATED ADDICTIONS AND PSYCHIATRY teleECHO PROGRAMa
General
“We got the help we needed to move forward with the patient.”
“Self-awareness of my reactions to difficult patients”
“I always learn a lot listening to other cases; they are pertinent to the patients that I see.”
Obtaining the History and Making the Diagnosis
“[How to open a] discussion with patients related to their tobacco use”
“Learning to assess for depression in elderly patients”
Approaches for Specific Diagnoses
“Opiate use management [among] pregnant women”
“Detailed screening questions for possible mania”
Behavioral Interventions
“For patients wishing to abstain from substance use, use MI [motivational interviewing] and role playing to help them have a large and useful ‘toolbox’ for remaining abstinent.”
“New skills to address ambivalence”
Medication Treatment
“Caution in [tapering] antipsychotics in psychotic depression”
“In TBI [traumatic brain injury] keep pharmacological regimens on a simple schedule.”
Treatment Settings and Resources
“Outpatient intensive alcohol use disorder treatment”
“I have new information about many [community-based treatment] facilities now.”
Stigma
“How to evaluate and minimize mental health stigma in teens”
“Reducing stigma in care of patient; it is a good reminder.”
___________________
aVideoconference-based delivery of case-based learning (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes model)
Compared with traditional CME, the ECHO model adheres more closely to the principles of adult learning theory. For example, when learners present cases from their own practices, it ensures that learning is problem based and focuses on the presenter’s current need. Case presentations reflect knowledge that presenters already possess, so new teaching and learning begin at exactly the right point. Finally, feedback in a teleECHO session arises from relatively informal discussion by the group and consists of suggestions and guidance from the specialists and other participants, rather than of instructions for the presenter.
When examined in light of Moore and colleagues’ framework for CME evaluation, these data indicate that learning through the ECHO model achieves level 5, which is characterized by participants doing what the CME activity intended for them to be able to do in caring for patients. In the IAP teleECHO program, 77% of responses of those who presented a patient case reported that presenting the case and receiving feedback prompted them to change their patient treatment plan.
Over time, this case-based support and mentorship is likely to lead to medical providers’ increased knowledge of and confidence in diagnosing and treating behavioral disorders as well as to better patient outcomes. Other data indicate that application of the ECHO model can achieve at least level 6 (change in patient health) (13,14), and this study demonstrates that participants’ receptiveness to the input they receive during case presentations is a catalyst for their behavior change.
Unlike traditional telemedicine, the ECHO model results in “force multiplication,” with a few specialists mentoring many PCPs, who in turn provide enhanced care for large numbers of patients. The ECHO model has similarities to the well-studied chronic care model (15) but does not rely on a single designated care coordinator in a primary care practice. In fact, by adding registry review by mental health specialists, an ECHO behavioral health program could be layered on top of the chronic care model.
In conclusion, ECHO participants greatly value input they receive during case discussions of patients with mental disorders or substance use disorders (or both) in teleECHO sessions, and they report that the process leads to treatment plan adjustment for their patients, consistent with Moore et al.’s level 5 impact of CME. ECHO is an easily replicable and flexible model that appears to expand access to high-quality care for behavioral disorders by supporting and mentoring PCPs, and it offers an improved method for providing CME. At a time when lack of treatment for behavioral health problems is causing national concern, ECHO provides a model to expand capacity for treatment.
References
1.
Cunningham PJ: Beyond parity: primary care physicians’ perspectives on access to mental health care. Health Affairs 28:w490–w501, 2009
2.
DeFlavio JR, Rolin SA, Nordstrom BR, et al: Analysis of barriers to adoption of buprenorphine maintenance therapy by family physicians. Rural and Remote Health 15:3019, 2015
3.
Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S, et al: No health without mental health. Lancet 370(9590):859–877, Sept 2007. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)61238-0/fulltext
4.
Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA: Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 29:1–15, 2009
5.
Bluestone J, Johnson P, Fullerton J, et al: Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review. Human Resources for Health 11:51, 2013
6.
Price D: Continuing medical education, quality improvement, and organizational change: implications of recent theories for twenty-first-century CME. Medical Teacher 27:259–268, 2005
7.
Davis D: Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 28:21–39, 1998
8.
Knowles MS: The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall Regents, 1970
9.
Kenner C, Weinerman J: Adult learning theory: applications to non-traditional college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning 41:87–96, 2011
10.
Komaromy M, Duhigg D, Metcalf A, et al: Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes): a new model for educating primary care providers about treatment of substance use disorders. Substance Abuse 37:20–24, 2016
11.
Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, et al: The impact of project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Academic Medicine 91:1439–1461, 2016
12.
Arora S, Kalishman S, Dion D, et al: Partnering urban academic medical centers and rural primary care clinicians to provide complex chronic disease care. Health Affairs 30:1176–1184, 2011
13.
Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, et al: Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. New England Journal of Medicine 364:2199–2207, 2011
14.
Gordon SE, Dufour AB, Monti SM, et al: Impact of a videoconference educational intervention on physical restraint and antipsychotic use in nursing homes: results from the ECHO-AGE pilot study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 17:553–556, 2016
15.
Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al: Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:2836–2845, 2002
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: Glowing Night, by Oscar Bluemner, 1924. Watercolor and pencil on paper. Bequest of Charles F. Ikle, 1963. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. Image source: Art Resource, New York City.
History
Received: 14 October 2016
Revision received: 6 May 2017
Accepted: 2 June 2017
Published online: 15 August 2017
Published in print: September 01, 2017
Keywords
Authors
Funding Information
Funding was generously provided by the New Mexico State Legislature and by grants from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, GE Foundation, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1R24HS016510-01A1).The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).