Self-Injurious Behavior Among Adults With ASD: Hospitalizations, Length of Stay, and Costs of Resources to Deliver Care
Abstract
Objective:
Research on hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is limited. This study compared admissions, average length of stay, and costs of resources to deliver care for such hospitalizations between adults with and without ASD.
Methods:
The 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was used to compare 5,341 discharge records for adults with ASD and 16,023 records for adults without ASD, matched on age and gender in a 1:3 ratio. Hierarchical logistic and linear regressions accounted for clustering by hospital. Covariates included gender, race-ethnicity, age, region, comorbidities, number of procedures, and insurance.
Results:
Among hospitalized adults, those with ASD were twice as likely as those without ASD to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Among hospital stays for self-injurious behavior and ideation, adults with ASD had average lengths of stay that were 2.14 days longer (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.20–3.08) compared with adults without ASD. Among adults with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, unadjusted average costs for those with ASD were 36.8% higher than for adults without ASD. After the analysis accounted for covariates and length of stay, adults with ASD still had 7.48% (95% CI=1.05%−14.32%) higher costs.
Conclusions:
Adults with ASD were twice as likely as adults without ASD to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Among adults with such a hospitalization, those with ASD had longer stays and, even after the analysis accounted for length of stay, higher costs.
Highlights
•
Research is limited on hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation and their costs among adults with a diagnosis of ASD.
•
The 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was used to compare 5,341 discharge records for adults with ASD and 16,023 records for adults without ASD, matched on age and gender in a 1:3 ratio.
•
Among hospitalized adults, those with ASD were twice as likely as those without ASD to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Among adults with such a hospitalization, those with ASD had longer stays, and even after the analysis accounted for length of stay, costs were also greater.
•
Research is needed to understand strategies for prevention of self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with ASD as well as the organizational needs of hospitals to appropriately accommodate adults with ASD and self-injurious behavior.
Individuals diagnosed as having autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at increased risk of experiencing psychological comorbidities (1–3), self-injurious behavior and ideation (4–7), and both suicide ideation and attempt (8–10). Although the etiology of self-injurious behavior and ideation in the ASD population is not entirely understood, it is theorized to arise from a combination of atypical sensory processing (11, 12), frustration with communication (13), and co-occurring psychological conditions (5, 14), with social determinants (e.g., bullying and social exclusion) perhaps mediating some of the association between ASD and psychiatric comorbidities (15). It is estimated that 28% of U.S. children with ASD experience self-injurious behavior (6). The percentage of U.S. children without ASD who exhibit self-injurious behavior has been estimated at around 8% (16). However, definitions of self-injurious behavior and ideation vary widely, limiting the ability to compare samples with and without ASD. Epidemiological research on self-injurious behavior and ideation among U.S. adults with ASD, rather than children, is limited, and little is known about the burden to the health care system.
In a 2008 study of predictors of hospitalization among children with ASD, self-injurious behavior and ideation was associated with an increase of 2.14 in the odds of hospitalization, and risk of hospitalization increased with age; however, the study used a relatively small convenience sample of caregivers, and age was truncated at 21 (17). Kalb and colleagues (18) analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to describe national rates of emergency department (ED) visits among children with and without ASD. This study demonstrated that the odds of psychiatry-related ED visits (e.g., suicide or self-harm or mood disorder) were ninefold higher among children with ASD compared with children without ASD. Vohra and colleagues (19) used HCUP’s NEDS data but restricted their analysis to adults ages 22–64. Their study also demonstrated that psychiatric conditions were the primary reason for ED visits for adults with ASD and that adults with ASD had a substantially higher rate of psychiatry-related ED visits compared with adults without ASD (15% versus 4%). Moreover, the average cost for ED visits was higher for adults with ASD compared with adults without ASD.
In a separate study, using 2008 HCUP NEDS data, Kalb and colleagues (20) found that youths with ASD were about five times more likely than youths without ASD to have an ED visit related to self-injurious behavior and ideation and to be hospitalized. In one of the few studies to focus on hospital utilization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with ASD, Kato and colleagues (21) utilized a small sample of 587 patients to compare characteristics of suicide attempts among ED visits of adults with and without ASD. Individuals with ASD were overrepresented among those who visited the ED for reasons associated with a suicide attempt and experienced longer hospital stays and higher costs. This study, however, was concentrated in only one hospital in Japan and was restricted to suicide attempts. Several other studies have corroborated the link between ASD and psychiatry-related ED visits and hospitalizations among children and adolescents, but they have not specifically focused on self-injurious behavior and ideation or on adults (22). To our knowledge, no nationally representative study has examined inpatient hospital utilization and costs related to self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with ASD in the United States.
In this study, we used HCUP’s 2014 National Inpatient Sample (23) (HCUP-NIS) to compare rates of hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation between adults with and without ASD, and we also identified differences in length of stay and costs. Given the potentially greater prevalence of self-injurious behavior and ideation among individuals with ASD compared with those without ASD, we hypothesized that compared with adults without ASD, adults with ASD would be more likely to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, would have longer stays for such hospitalizations, and would have higher costs. Because previous research has focused primarily on the ED setting and on children with ASD, this study filled a gap in the literature by evaluating inpatient hospitalization (not ED visits) among adults with self-injurious behavior and ideation by using a nationally representative sample.
Methods
Data Source
Data for this study were derived from the HCUP-NIS, the largest all-payer, publicly available U.S. inpatient health care database. It contains data on approximately eight million hospital stays each year from about 1,000 hospitals. These data yield approximately a 20% stratified sample of U.S. community hospitals. The sample of hospitals was drawn from 44 states plus the District of Columbia and was divided into 60 strata based on geographic region, ownership, location, teaching status, and size. Detailed information on the design of the survey is available elsewhere (23).
The HCUP-NIS contains more than 100 clinical and nonclinical data elements for each hospital stay, including the primary diagnosis, up to 24 secondary diagnoses, and up to 14 procedures coded with ICD-9-CM codes. Records also include admission and discharge status, patients’ sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., gender, age, race-ethnicity, health insurance, zip code, and median household income), clinical characteristics (based on the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ]) (24, 25), hospital characteristics (e.g., U.S. region of hospital), and charges. The HCUP-NIS does not include unique patient identifiers; thus the unit of analysis is hospital discharge.
Sample
We used a validated ASD case identification algorithm to identify adults with ASD (26). From the discharge data, records with a primary or secondary diagnosis of ASD with ICD-9-CM codes 299.0–299.9 were extracted (these codes include autistic disorder; pervasive developmental disorders; other pervasive developmental disorders, such as Asperger’s; and unspecified pervasive developmental disorders). This extraction procedure yielded the sample of case records of persons with ASD. This method of ASD case ascertainment has been widely used (27). The control group of adults without ASD was matched by age and gender in a 1:3 ratio.
Measures
Dependent variables.
The main dependent variables were hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, length of stay for such hospitalizations, and costs. Hospitalizations were identified as related to self-injurious behavior and ideation if they had an ICD-9-CM code of E950.0–E959 (suicide and attempted suicide and self-inflicted injuries specified as intentional) and V62.84 (suicidal ideation). The length-of-stay variable was derived for each individual hospitalization associated with self-injurious behavior and ideation. The cost variable was derived from HCUP’s cost-to-charge ratio file and represents an estimate for resources utilized without physician fees. Cost was converted to log cost for use in the regression models.
Independent variable.
The main independent variable was an indicator of whether the discharge record did or did not list a primary or secondary diagnosis of ASD.
Covariates.
Model covariates included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Sociodemographic characteristics included age (18–24, 25–35, 36–49, and ≥50), type of health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid, private, and uninsured), median household income for patients’ zip code ($1–$38,999, $39,000–$47,999, $48,000–$62,999, and ≥$63,000), and region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Clinical characteristics included having one or more of the comorbidities (identified by the AHRQ with standard methods of Elixhauser and colleagues [24) and number of procedures.
Statistical Analyses
Unadjusted sociodemographic characteristics and hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation were compared by ASD status. Additional comparisons of clinical and service characteristics by ASD status were conducted among those with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, including comorbidity, number of procedures, length of stay, and cost. A chi-square test was used to assess differences in frequencies for categorical variables. Means, standard deviations, and medians are reported for continuous variables; significance was tested with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test because of nonnormal distributions (28).
We used hierarchical mixed-effects models (29) to account for the clustering nature of the HCUP-NIS data (30). In this study, patients (level 1) were clustered within hospitals (level 2). Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression was used for the binary dependent variable (having a code for a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation), and hierarchical mixed-effects linear regression was used for the continuous dependent variables (length of stay and cost). In addition, we evaluated the presence of any moderation by including interaction terms between ASD and the covariates in each model. Sampling weights were not used on the basis of AHRQ’s recommendation (30). All analyses were performed with Stata 14 MP (31).
This study was approved by the Brandeis University Institutional Review Board.
Results
In Table 1 we present bivariate, unadjusted data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with and without a diagnosis of ASD who were age and gender matched in a 1:3 ratio. We identified 5,341 hospital admissions of adults with ASD and 16,023 admissions of adults without ASD. Compared with adults without ASD, adults with ASD were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and to have public health insurance (Medicare or Medicaid) and were less likely to be uninsured and living in a low-income area. Adults with ASD were more likely than adults without ASD to have a code indicating that the hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation (12.7% versus 6.1%), to have longer lengths of stay (7.61 versus 5.43 days), and to have 36.8% higher costs ($6,788.37 versus $4,961.06).
| ASD diagnosis (N=5,341) | No ASD diagnosis (N=16,023) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | N | % | N | % | χ2 |
| Gendera | |||||
| Male | 3,972 | 74.4 | 11,916 | 74.4 | |
| Female | 1,368 | 25.6 | 4,104 | 25.6 | |
| Missing | 1 | <.1 | 3 | <.1 | |
| Race-ethnicity | 521.99***b | ||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 3,743 | 70.1 | 8,791 | 54.9 | |
| Non-Hispanic black | 563 | 10.5 | 3,006 | 18.8 | |
| Hispanic | 374 | 7.0 | 2,189 | 13.7 | |
| Non-Hispanic other | 238 | 4.5 | 1,069 | 6.7 | |
| Unknown | 423 | 7.9 | 968 | 6.0 | |
| Age at admissiona | |||||
| 18–24 | 2,272 | 42.5 | 6,816 | 42.5 | |
| 25–35 | 1,305 | 24.4 | 3,915 | 24.4 | |
| 36–49 | 776 | 14.5 | 2,328 | 14.5 | |
| ≥50 | 988 | 18.5 | 2,964 | 18.5 | |
| Insurance payer type | 1,400.00***c | ||||
| Medicare | 1,841 | 34.5 | 2,239 | 14.0 | |
| Medicaid | 1,805 | 33.8 | 5,097 | 31.8 | |
| Private | 1,419 | 26.6 | 6,069 | 37.9 | |
| Uninsured | 266 | 5.0 | 2,578 | 16.1 | |
| Missing | 10 | .2 | 40 | .3 | |
| Median household income for zip code of residence | 123.61***d | ||||
| 1st quartile: $1–$38,999 | 1,298 | 24.3 | 4,995 | 31.2 | |
| 2nd quartile: $39,000–$47,999 | 1,399 | 26.2 | 4,198 | 26.2 | |
| 3rd quartile: $48,000–$62,999 | 1,275 | 23.9 | 3,470 | 21.7 | |
| 4th quartile: ≥$63,000 | 1,225 | 24.1 | 2,884 | 18.0 | |
| Missing | 144 | 2.7 | 476 | 3.0 | |
| Hospitalization coded as related to self-injurious behavior and ideation | 677 | 12.7 | 984 | 6.1 | 238.53***b |
| ≥1 comorbidities among those with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation | 486 | 71.8 | 228 | 23.2 | 5.41*b |
| M±SD | Median | M±SD | Median | WMWe | |
| N of procedures among those with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation | .29±1.03 | 0 | .32±.99 | 0 | 1.58 |
| Length of stay among those with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation (days) | 7.61±13.05 | 5 | 5.43±5.29 | 4 | 5.47*** |
| Cost among those with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation | $6,788.37± $14,743.76 | $3,939.30 | $4,961.06±$5,988.77 | $3,285.58 | 4.74*** |
a
No between-group differences were found for age and gender because the groups were matched on these variables.
b
df=1.
c
df=3.
d
df=5.
e
Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
*
p≤.05, ***p≤.001.
In Table 2 we present the hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression results for the association between ASD status and having a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. We first present a main-effects model and then a full model with interactions. After controlling for model covariates, we found that adults with ASD had nearly twice the odds (odds ratio [OR]=1.99) of having a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, compared with adults without ASD. There were also significant interactions of ASD with gender, age, and insurance. Compared with men, women were less likely (OR=0.31) to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation if they did not have ASD. However, among adults with ASD, hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation did not differ significantly by gender. Among adults with ASD, those ages 25–35 were no less likely than those ages 18–24 to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation; however, among adults without ASD, those ages 25 to 35 were significantly less likely (OR=0.69) than those ages 18 to 24 to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Although the rate of hospitalization for self-injurious behavior and ideation was lower among adults ages ≥50 with ASD (odds=.022, 95% CI=.015–.032) relative to adults ages ≥50 without ASD (odds=.006, 95% CI=.004–.008). No interaction was found between ASD and the 36–49 age group. Finally, among adults with ASD, having Medicare, having Medicaid, and being uninsured, compared with private insurance, were not predictors of having a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. However, among adults without ASD, having Medicare coverage, compared with private insurance, was associated with a greater likelihood of having a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation (OR=1.89), as was having Medicaid coverage (OR=1.62).
| Model 1: main effects | Model 2: with interactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
| ASD (reference: no ASD) | 1.99*** | 1.76–2.26 | 2.07*** | 1.65–2.60 |
| Female (reference: male) | .57 | .49–.66 | .31*** | .24–.38 |
| Race-ethnicity (reference: non-Hispanic white) | ||||
| Non-Hispanic black | .61*** | .51–.73 | .60*** | .50–.72 |
| Hispanic | .51*** | .40–.64 | .51*** | .41–.65 |
| Non-Hispanic other | .63** | .48–.84 | .64** | .48–.84 |
| Unknown | 1.16 | .88–1.54 | 1.15 | .87–1.53 |
| Age group (reference: 18–24) | ||||
| 25–35 | .79** | .69–.91 | .69*** | .58–.82 |
| 36–49 | .52*** | .43–.63 | .56*** | .44–.70 |
| ≥50 | .17*** | .14–.22 | .13*** | .09–.19 |
| Insurance (reference: private) | ||||
| Medicare | 1.20 | .99–1.45 | 1.89*** | 1.44–2.47 |
| Medicaid | 1.24** | 1.07–1.43 | 1.62*** | 1.35–1.94 |
| Uninsured | 1.3** | 1.08–1.57 | 1.30* | 1.04–1.61 |
| Median household income (reference: ≥$63,000) | ||||
| 1st quartile: $1–$38,999 | 1.26* | 1.04–1.53 | 1.24* | 1.02–1.50 |
| 2nd quartile: $39,000–$47,999 | 1.24* | 1.03–1.49 | 1.24* | 1.03–1.49 |
| 3rd quartile: $48,000–$62,999 | 1.19 | .99–1.43 | 1.18 | .98–1.42 |
| Region (reference: Northeast) | ||||
| Midwest | 1.31* | 1.01–1.7 | 1.35* | 1.04–1.76 |
| South | .91 | .71–1.17 | .95 | .74–1.22 |
| West | .92 | .70–1.22 | .93 | .71–1.24 |
| Significant interactions with ASD | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI |
| ASD × female | 3.59 | 2.63–4.90 | ||
| ASD × age 25–35 | 1.54 | 1.16–2.04 | ||
| ASD × age ≥50 | 1.90 | 1.13–3.17 | ||
| ASD × Medicare | .38 | .26–.55 | ||
| ASD × Medicaid | .51 | .38–.68 | ||
| Intercept | .05*** | .04–.06 | .04 | .03–.06 |
*
p≤.05, **p≤.01, ***p≤.001.
In Table 3 we present the hierarchical mixed-effects linear regression results for the association between ASD status and length of hospital stay among those with hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. After controlling for model covariates and clustering, we found that among adults whose hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, those with ASD spent 2.14 additional days in the hospital compared with adults without ASD. No significant interactions were found between ASD status and covariates in predicting length of stay among adults with hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation.
| Variable | Coefficient | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| ASD (reference: no ASD) | 2.14*** | 1.20, 3.08 |
| Female (reference: male) | .46 | −.75, 1.66 |
| Race-ethnicity (reference: non-Hispanic white) | ||
| Non-Hispanic black | 1.36 | −.03, 2.77 |
| Hispanic | −.23 | –1.97, 1.52 |
| Non-Hispanic other | −.002 | –2.18, 2.18 |
| Unknown | −.61 | –2.23, 1.00 |
| Age group (reference: 0–11) | ||
| 11–20 (adolescence) | .18 | −.90, 1.25 |
| 21–45 (younger adults) | −.02 | –1.5, 1.45 |
| ≥46 (older adults) | 1.95 | −.13, 4.04 |
| Region (reference: East) | ||
| Midwest | –2.92*** | –4.28, –1.55 |
| South | –3.15*** | –4.49, –1.81 |
| West | –2.43** | –3.97, −.89 |
| Presence of comorbidities | .39 | −.63, 1.42 |
| N of procedures | 1.34*** | .89, 1.79 |
| Insurance (reference: private) | ||
| Medicare | .03 | –1.41, 1.47 |
| Medicaid | −.06 | –1.14, 1.02 |
| Uninsured | −.54 | –1.97, .90 |
| Intercept | 6.83*** | 5.33, 8.32 |
**
p≤.01, ***p≤.001.
In Table 4 we present hierarchical mixed-effects linear regression results for the association between ASD status and total log costs for hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. After controlling for sociodemographic factors only, we found that among individuals whose hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, those with ASD had higher costs than those without ASD (16.81% higher, 95% confidence interval=8.05%−26.29%). When the analysis controlled for comorbidity, number of procedures, and length of stay among those whose hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, adults with ASD had 7.48% (95% CI=1.05%–14.32%) higher residual costs compared with those without ASD. No significant interactions were found between ASD and covariates in predicting costs among those with hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation.
| Model 1: sociodemographic variables only | Model 2: with clinical characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coefficienta | 95% CI | Coefficienta | 95% CI |
| ASD (reference: no ASD) | .16*** | .08, .23 | .07* | .01, .13 |
| Female (reference: male) | −.01 | −.10, .09 | −.01 | −.09, .06 |
| Race-ethnicity (reference: non-Hispanic white) | ||||
| Non-Hispanic black | .09 | −.02, .21 | .03 | −.06, .13 |
| Hispanic | .01** | −.14, .16 | .03** | −.09, .15 |
| Non-Hispanic other | .25 | .07, .43 | .21 | −.09, .15 |
| Unknown | .02 | −.14, .18 | .05 | −.08, .17 |
| Age group (reference: 0–11) | ||||
| 11–20 (adolescence) | .05 | −.04, .13 | .01 | −.06, .08 |
| 21–45 (younger adults) | .15* | .02, .27 | .10* | .00, .19 |
| ≥46 (older adults) | .39*** | .22, .56 | .30*** | .16, .43 |
| Region (reference: East) | ||||
| Midwest | −.48*** | −.61, −.34 | −.30*** | −.41, −.18 |
| South | −.54*** | −.67, −.40 | .01*** | −.50, −.28 |
| West | −.22** | −.37, −.06 | −.10 | −.23, .03 |
| Insurance (reference: private) | ||||
| Medicare | .16** | .05, .28 | .14** | .04, .23 |
| Medicaid | .03 | −.06, .12 | .01 | −.06, .08 |
| Uninsured | −.08 | −.20, .04 | −.06 | −.15, .04 |
| N of procedures | .14*** | .11, .17 | ||
| N of comorbidities | .02 | −.05, .08 | ||
| Length of stay | .05*** | .04, .05 | ||
| Intercept | 8.45*** | 8.32, 8.57 | 8.04*** | 7.93, 8.15 |
a
Log costs, which can be converted to percentage differences by using the following formula: (exp(coef)–1) × 100.
*
p≤.05, **p≤.01, ***p≤.001.
Discussion
The results support our hypotheses, suggesting that adults with ASD are nearly twice as likely as adults without ASD to have inpatient admissions related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Among adults whose hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, those with ASD had longer stays and, even after the analysis accounted for length of stay, they also had higher costs. These findings build on past research demonstrating that adults and children with ASD are more likely than those without ASD to frequent the ED for psychiatric treatment (18, 19), that self-injurious behavior and ideation is a predictor of hospitalization among children with ASD (17), and that self-injurious behavior and ideation is more prevalent among both adults and children with ASD (8–10). These findings specifically illustrate the burden presented to inpatient psychiatric units by adults with ASD and self-injurious behavior and ideation.
The relationship between gender, age, and insurance and hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with and without ASD suggests that approaches to preventing and understanding high-risk self-injurious behavior and ideation might differ for adults depending on ASD diagnosis. We found no gender differences in hospital admissions for self-injurious behavior and ideation among those with ASD; however, among those without ASD, men had higher rates of hospitalization for self-injurious behavior and ideation compared with women. In the general population, epidemiological research on nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior and ideation has provided conflicting evidence on gender differences, with some research finding no differences by gender (32) and others finding a higher prevalence among females (33). Future research should investigate gender differences in self-injurious behavior and ideation, especially with respect to typology and severity.
Age has a moderating effect on self-injurious behavior and ideation in the community. For the general population, young adults (18–24) are at substantially increased risk of self-injurious behavior and ideation compared with older adults (32). We found that among adults without ASD, older age decreased the risk of hospitalization for self-injurious behavior and ideation; however, among adults with ASD, those ages 25–35 were no less likely than those ages 18–24 to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation. Further, adults ages ≥50 with ASD were more likely to have a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation relative to adults ages ≥50 without ASD. This suggests that self-injurious behavior and ideation, or at least those cases requiring hospitalization, remains a constant phenomenon well into adulthood for those with ASD. We noted differences between those with and without ASD in how insurance type was related to hospitalizations for self-injurious behavior and ideation; however, it is unclear what these findings mean. Research examining the role of insurance coverage on health care access and utilization among children with ASD found that those with private insurance had a lower likelihood than those with public insurance of receiving therapy and higher out-of-pocket expenses (34). It is unclear how this phenomenon might affect utilization of crisis services among adults with ASD in particular.
Among adults with a hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, those with ASD had longer stays than those without ASD, and after the analysis controlled for clinical factors and length of stay, they also had higher residual costs. Differences in costs not associated with comorbidity, number of procedures, or length of stay could be attributed to greater use of private rooms and to use of psychotropics. Previous research has suggested that polypharmacy in inpatient psychiatry contributes to longer stays and adverse events (35). Indeed, antipsychotic use and polypharmacy are highly prevalent among adults with autism (and developmental disabilities more broadly) in outpatient settings, especially among those with a history of psychiatric crisis and service utilization (36, 37). It is reasonable to suspect even greater use of polypharmacy in the inpatient context for persons with ASD (38, 39).
The evidence found in this study—for greater prevalence of hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation, for longer stays, and for higher costs among adults with ASD compared with those without ASD—suggests the need to ensure that inpatient hospital environments are able to provide appropriate care. The environment of hospitals presents unique sensory, interpersonal, and organizational challenges that could exacerbate distress among adults with ASD (e.g., disruption in routine, harsh lighting, and communal settings). Providers’ capacity to accommodate the needs of adults with ASD could be limited (40). Therefore, efforts should be made to support providers’ ability to safely treat and deescalate distress among adults with ASD. Moreover, future research should focus on identifying interventions to prevent distress and hospitalization among those with ASD (41), with particular attention given not only to those of transition age (42) but also to young adults more broadly.
The study limitations warrant consideration. First, it is possible that some adults with ASD admitted to the hospital were not coded as having ASD, because the main reasons for the hospitalization and the related diagnosis were the focus and not the person’s ASD. In addition, there may be a bias in accuracy of coding toward those who present to the ED with symptoms of behavioral health conditions, because such patients might be more likely to be screened for behavioral health history and thus have their ASD identified and coded. This nonrandom variability in reliability of coding could have biased comparisons between adults with and without ASD in predicting self-injurious behavior and ideation, but it is likely to be of less concern in the comparisons between the ASD and non-ASD groups whose hospitalization was related to self-injurious behavior and ideation (i.e., length of stay and costs). Also, we used administrative data rather than data from chart reviews, which also limited our ability to observe all cases of both self-injurious behavior and ASD. Nevertheless, the process for extracting ASD codes has been validated and widely used (27).
Second, common with many secondary data analyses, some data were missing; however, multiple imputation was employed for variables with missing data, consistent with best practices (43, 44). Third, causality cannot be established because of the cross-sectional nature of the data. Fourth, we were working with a hospital-based denominator; future epidemiological research should more rigorously assess risk of hospitalization related to self-injurious behavior and ideation by using community-based denominators. Finally, we were unable to distinguish type and severity of self-injurious behavior and ideation or differences in presentation of ASD (e.g., verbal or intellectual disability), which limited the depth of our analyses.
Conclusions
This study has added to the literature by using a nationally representative sample to evaluate hospitalizations related to self-injurious behavior and ideation among adults with ASD. Adults with ASD might lack access to appropriate health care services, have difficulty communicating their symptoms to their health care providers, be more sensitive to stimuli and stressors, and lack a healthy social support network (45). Future research is needed to better understand prevention of hospitalization among adults with ASD, as well as organizational elements that might support hospital staff and providers in accommodating adults with ASD who are hospitalized with self-injurious behavior and ideation.
Footnote
The opinions, results, and conclusions reported here are those of the authors and are independent from the funding source.
References
1.
Joshi G, Petty C, Wozniak J, et al: The heavy burden of psychiatric comorbidity in youth with autism spectrum disorders: a large comparative study of a psychiatrically referred population. J Autism Dev Disord 2010; 40:1361–1370
2.
Munesue T, Ono Y, Mutoh K, et al: High prevalence of bipolar disorder comorbidity in adolescents and young adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a preliminary study of 44 outpatients. J Affect Disord 2008; 111:170–175
3.
Lever AG, Geurts HM: Psychiatric co-occurring symptoms and disorders in young, middle-aged, and older adults with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2016; 46:1916–1930
4.
Minshawi NF, Hurwitz S, Fodstad JC, et al: The association between self-injurious behaviors and autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2014; 7:125–136
5.
Richards C, Oliver C, Nelson L, et al: Self-injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 2012; 56:476–489
6.
Soke GN, Rosenberg SA, Hamman RF, et al: Prevalence of self-injurious behaviors among children with autism spectrum disorder: a population-based study. J Autism Dev Disord 2016; 46:3607–3614
7.
Maddox BB, Trubanova A, White SW: Untended wounds: non-suicidal self-injury in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 2017; 21:412–422
8.
Mayes SD, Gorman AA, Hillwig-Garcia J, et al: Suicide ideation and attempts in children with autism. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2013; 7:109–119
9.
Richa S, Fahed M, Khoury E, et al: Suicide in autism spectrum disorders. Arch Suicide Res 2014; 18:327–339
10.
Cassidy S, Bradley P, Robinson J, et al: Suicidal ideation and suicide plans or attempts in adults with Asperger’s syndrome attending a specialist diagnostic clinic: a clinical cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 2014; 1:142–147
11.
Duerden EG, Oatley HK, Mak-Fan KM, et al: Risk factors associated with self-injurious behaviors in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2012; 42:2460–2470
12.
Duerden EG, Card D, Roberts SW, et al: Self-injurious behaviours are associated with alterations in the somatosensory system in children with autism spectrum disorder. Brain Struct Funct 2014; 219:1251–1261
13.
Devine DP: Self-injurious behaviour in autistic children: a neuro-developmental theory of social and environmental isolation. Psychopharmacology 2014; 231:979–997
14.
Soke GN, Rosenberg SA, Hamman RF, et al: Factors associated with self-injurious behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorder: findings from two large national samples. J Autism Dev Disord 2017; 47:285–296
15.
Balfe M, Tantam D: A descriptive social and health profile of a community sample of adults and adolescents with Asperger syndrome. BMC Res Notes 2010; 3:300
16.
Barrocas AL, Hankin BL, Young JF, et al: Rates of nonsuicidal self-injury in youth: age, sex, and behavioral methods in a community sample. Pediatrics 2012;130:39–45
17.
Mandell DS: Psychiatric hospitalization among children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2008; 38:1059–1065
18.
Kalb LG, Stuart EA, Freedman B, et al: Psychiatric-related emergency department visits among children with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28:1269–1276
19.
Vohra R, Madhavan S, Sambamoorthi U: Emergency department use among adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). J Autism Dev Disord 2016; 46:1441–1454
20.
Kalb LG, Vasa RA, Ballard ED, et al: Epidemiology of injury-related emergency department visits in the US among youth with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2016; 46:2756–2763
21.
Kato K, Mikami K, Akama F, et al: Clinical features of suicide attempts in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2013; 35:50–53
22.
Siegel M, Gabriels RL: Psychiatric hospital treatment of children with autism and serious behavioral disturbance. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2014; 23:125–142
23.
Introduction to the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2011. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015; https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2011.jsp. Accessed Dec 12, 2015
24.
Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, et al: Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36:8–27
25.
Houchens RLRD, Elixhauser A: Using the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample to Estimate Trends (Updated for 1988–2004). HCUP Methods Series. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006
26.
Bush RA, Connelly CD, Pérez A, et al: Extracting autism spectrum disorder data from the electronic health record. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8:731–741
27.
Leslie DL, Martin A: Health care expenditures associated with autism spectrum disorders. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161:350–355
28.
Moses LE: Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; in Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Edited by Armitage P, Colton C. New York, Wiley, 2005
29.
Calvin JA, Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW: Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Technometrics 1994; 36:116
30.
Houchens RCB, Steiner C: Hierarchical Modeling Using HCUP Data. HCUP Methods Series Report 2007-01. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007
31.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX, StataCorp, 2015
32.
Swannell SV, Martin GE, Page A, et al: Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2014; 44:273–303
33.
Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al: Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 192:98–105
34.
Zhang W, Baranek G: The impact of insurance coverage types on access to and utilization of health services for US children with autism. Psychiatr Serv 2016; 67:908–911
35.
Centorrino F, Goren JL, Hennen J, et al: Multiple versus single antipsychotic agents for hospitalized psychiatric patients: case-control study of risks versus benefits. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161:700–706
36.
Lake JK, Balogh R, Lunsky Y: Polypharmacy profiles and predictors among adults with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2012; 6:1142–1149
37.
Lunsky Y, Elserafi J: Antipsychotic medication prescription patterns in adults with developmental disabilities who have experienced psychiatric crisis. Res Dev Disabil 2012; 33:32–38
38.
Doyle CA, McDougle CJ, Stigler KA: Pharmacotherapy of behavioral symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities in adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorders; in Adolescents and Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Edited by Volkmar FR, Reichow B, McPartland J. New York, Springer, 2014
39.
Wink LK, Pedapati EV, Adams R, et al: Characterization of medication use in a multicenter sample of pediatric inpatients with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2018; 48:3711–3719
40.
Zwaigenbaum L, Nicholas DB, Muskat B, et al: Perspectives of health care providers regarding emergency department care of children and youth with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2016; 46:1725–1736
41.
D’Alli RE, Valcante G: Mental health crisis management for youths with autism spectrum disorder requires a paradigm shift. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68:985
42.
Nathenson RA, Zablotsky B: The transition to the adult health care system among youths with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatr Serv 2017; 68:735–738
43.
Schenker N, Raghunathan TE, Chiu P-L, et al: Multiple imputation of missing income data in the National Health Interview Survey. J Am Stat Assoc 2006; 101:924–933
44.
Royston PW, White IR: Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw 2011; 45:1–20
45.
Locke J, Ishijima EH, Kasari C, et al: Loneliness, friendship quality and the social networks of adolescents with high‐functioning autism in an inclusive school setting. J Res Spec Educ Needs 2010; 10:74–81
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cover: XXXX
History
Received: 8 July 2018
Revision received: 30 November 2018
Accepted: 10 January 2019
Published online: 7 March 2019
Published in print: June 01, 2019
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
This study was supported by a Brandeis University Provost Research Grant and the Lurie Institute for Disability Policy at Brandeis University. Part of Ms. Shields’ time was supported by predoctoral training grant T32AA007567 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).