An Examination of the Roles of Mental Health Literacy, Treatment-Seeking Stigma, and Perceived Need for Care in Female Veterans’ Service Use
Abstract
Objective:
Little is known about the role of mental health literacy in military veterans’ treatment-seeking stigma and service use, or the impact of these factors on perceived need for mental health care. In addition, most research has focused on mixed-gender samples. This study examined the relationships among mental health literacy, treatment seeking stigma, perceived need for mental health care, and service use in a national, longitudinal study of female veterans.
Methods:
A sample of 171 female veterans were drawn from a larger three-wave prospective national survey conducted between 2014 and 2017.
Results:
Path analyses revealed that treatment seeking stigma had a direct negative effect on service use and an indirect effect that was mediated by perceived need for care, such that higher treatment seeking stigma was associated with lower perceived need for mental health care. Mental health literacy had an indirect effect on service use via its inverse association with treatment-seeking stigma. In contrast, mental health literacy was not associated with perceived need.
Conclusions:
Mental health literacy, treatment-seeking stigma, and perceived need for care affect female veterans’ service use in unique ways. Further longitudinal research is needed to better understand these pathways in diverse samples.
HIGHLIGHTS
•
Perceived need for care is a key mechanism linking treatment-seeking stigma to service use among female veterans.
•
Mental health literacy had an indirect effect on service use through reduced treatment-seeking stigma among female veterans.
•
Mental health literacy did not directly affect perceived need for care or service use among female veterans.
Female veterans, like their male counterparts, are at risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and substance use disorders (1, 2). This heightened risk may be at least partially explained by the fact that female veterans have increased exposure to combat in recent military conflicts (3) and are at risk of experiencing military sexual trauma and intimate partner violence (4, 5), both of which are known to increase the likelihood of mental health problems (6, 7). These trauma exposures and related mental health problems are also strongly associated with suicide risk, a major public health concern for both female and male veterans (8).
However, like men, many female veterans who would benefit from care do not access mental health services (9–11). Several unique barriers to women’s use of health care services have been identified, including lack of sensitivity to gender-specific needs on the part of some providers (12) and lack of knowledge or misperceptions among some female veterans regarding their eligibility for, and access to, health care (13, 14). However, one of the most significant barriers to mental health treatment is stigma.
Mental health stigma is multidimensional, and it includes mechanisms such as anticipated, internalized, and experienced stigma (15–18). Mental health stigma can also be broken down into stigma related to mental health problems and stigma related to treatment seeking. Prior studies that have examined veterans’ internalization of treatment-seeking stigma have revealed some notable gender differences (19, 20), underscoring the importance of addressing stigma’s impact on outcomes separately for female veterans (e.g., 19). The importance of examining female veterans’ experiences of stigma, and the consequences of stigma, separately from those of male veterans is further highlighted by the possibility that military cultural norms that promote masculinity and devalue femininity (21), as well as concerns about being perceived as less deserving of care for not being “real combat” veterans (16), may complicate female veterans’ service use.
Although several studies have documented the negative impact of treatment-seeking stigma on treatment seeking among female veterans (17, 19, 22), the mechanisms that explain how treatment-seeking stigma affects help seeking in female veterans remain poorly characterized, in part because of the lack of longitudinal research on these relationships (15, 18). One potential mechanism through which treatment-seeking stigma is theorized to affect service use is through its impact on perceived need for mental health care. The health beliefs model (23), which has been used to guide research on a range of stigmatized conditions such as HIV-AIDS (24) and mental health problems, introduced the concept and importance of perceived need for care in understanding the decision to seek care. This model posits that an individual’s beliefs about disease severity, need for care, and benefits of treatment predict health care behavior (25).
Perceived need for care is a potentially powerful mechanism that may link treatment-seeking stigma and service use given that lack of perceived need is one of the reasons veterans cite most frequently for not seeking care. In a study of Canadian Armed Forces members, between 84% and 96% of respondents reported that they did not seek care because they did not perceive their mental health problems to be severe enough (26). In a national sample of U.S. service members, lower perceived need for mental health care was associated with lower use of mental health services. Although perceived need may be affected by treatment-seeking stigma, it has received limited attention in the broader literature on veterans’ treatment-seeking stigma and even less in the literature related to female veterans’ treatment seeking.
Another factor that may be relevant to the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma and service use is mental health literacy. Mental health literacy refers to the extent to which individuals are knowledgeable about mental health problems and their treatment (27). Stigma-reduction theory posits that mental health stigma can be reduced through increased knowledge of and contact with people experiencing mental health problems and seeking treatment (28, 29). Consistent with this theory, research on civilian samples has found that individuals with higher mental health literacy have more positive perceptions about treatment and exhibit reduced social distance stigma (30). Initial evidence also has supported the relationship between mental health literacy and perceived need for care in civilian samples because individuals with higher mental health literacy have been better able to identify mental health problems, and this ability has been hypothesized as the first step in the treatment-seeking process (31–34). However, research on how mental health literacy affects female veterans’ treatment seeking remains extremely limited.
Although treatment-seeking stigma, perceived need for care, and mental health literacy have all been shown to affect treatment seeking, to our knowledge, no study has examined relationships among these factors in a longitudinal sample of military veterans or female veterans specifically. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine associations among these variables in a study of female veterans that included multiple assessments. Figure 1 depicts a visualization of our hypothesized model. We hypothesized that when accounting for the role of psychological distress, women who demonstrated higher mental health literacy would report less treatment-seeking stigma (path H1), higher perceived need for care (path H2), and higher likelihood of mental health service use (path H3).
FIGURE 1. Hypothesized model of associations between characteristics of female veterans and use of mental health servicesa
aH, hypothesis. Psychological distress is included as a covariate. Darker paths represent hypothesized mediational paths between mental health literacy and care utilization through treatment-seeking stigma and through perceived need for care.
In addition, we expected that women who reported more treatment-seeking stigma would report lower perceived need for care (path H4) and lower likelihood of mental health service use (path H5). Finally, we hypothesized that perceived need for care would mediate the effect of mental health literacy and treatment-seeking stigma on mental health service use, such that those who reported higher mental health literacy and lower treatment-seeking stigma would perceive greater need for care, which, in turn, would be associated with increased service use. Darker paths depict mediation by perceived need for care on care utilization. Nonhypothesized pathways are included to demonstrate how psychological distress was controlled for in the model.
Methods
Sample
Data were drawn from a larger, three-wave prospective national survey of female veterans conducted between November 5, 2014, and January 8, 2017. Participants were recruited through KnowledgePanel, a probability-based, nonvolunteer access survey panel of 55,000 U.S. adults that is representative of approximately 97% of U.S. households (35). Among 548 female veterans in the sampling frame, 411 participated at time 1 (baseline). Of these participants, 171 completed the latter two timepoints (time 2, 18 months postbaseline; time 3, 24 months postbaseline).
For the purpose of this study, which required collection of measures of distress, mental health literacy, and treatment-seeking stigma at time 2 and service use at time 3, we relied on time 2 and time 3 data from these 171 participants. Demographic comparisons between responders and nonresponders at both timepoints were nonsignificant. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Participants completed Web-based surveys at time 1, time 2, and time 3. For more details about recruitment processes, see Iverson et al. (36).
Measures
Psychological distress.
A summed composite of standardized scores on the anxiety subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (37); the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (38); and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (39) was created to represent general psychological distress. Each measure contributing to the composite score demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.94–0.95). The composite measure was also reliable (Cronbach’s α=0.91). These data were measured at time 2.
Treatment-seeking stigma.
To measure treatment-seeking stigma, we used the negative beliefs about treatment seeking subscale of the Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory (40). The scale consists of eight items that assess the degree to which individuals endorse stigmatizing beliefs about mental health treatment seeking (e.g., “I would think less of myself if I were to seek mental health treatment”; “Seeing a mental health provider would make me feel weak”) on a Likert scale ranging from 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree. This scale demonstrated structural, convergent, and discriminant validity in veteran samples as well as good reliability (40). The scale demonstrated good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach’s α=0.90). These data were measured at time 2.
Mental health literacy.
We developed the seven-item Mental Health Literacy scale because there was no established measure of mental health literacy that met the needs of our study. This measure assesses the extent to which individuals have knowledge about the etiology of mental health problems (e.g., “I am knowledgeable about the types of military experiences that can cause mental health problems”), knowledge of symptom identification (e.g., “I am familiar with the symptoms of PTSD”), and knowledge of effective treatment options (“I would know how to get mental health treatment if I needed help”) on a Likert scale ranging from 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree. This scale demonstrated good internal consistency in this study (Cronbach’s α=0.89). A sum score of the seven items was used for hypothesis testing. These data were measured at time 2.
Perceived need for mental health treatment.
To assess perceived need for mental health treatment in the past 6 months (time 3), we used a single dichotomous item: “Have you had an emotional problem that required health care?”
Health care utilization.
A dichotomous variable was created to assess any mental health service use—including urgent care, inpatient treatment, outpatient psychotherapy, and medication use—for PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health problems, including alcohol or drug use, or attending a support group for a mental health problem in the past 6 months in VA or civilian health care settings. These data were measured at time 3.
Analytic Plan
Bivariate associations between predictor and outcome variables were examined by using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20 (41). Hypotheses were tested via path analysis in Mplus, version 7.11 (42). Weighted least squares was used for model estimation to better account for dichotomous mediator and outcome variables (i.e., perceived need for mental health care and service use; 43). Bias-corrected bootstrapping was used to test mediation (44). Confidence intervals (CIs) of the indirect effects that did not contain zero were used as evidence of significant mediation.
Results
Full demographic information is presented in Table 1. Study data were screened before data analysis to test the assumptions related to path analysis (e.g., normality and multicollinearity), and no violations were found. Mean±SD scores for study variables and correlations between variables are presented in Table 2.
| Characteristic | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age (M±SD) | 52.46±13.16 | |
| Race-ethnicity | ||
| White, non-Hispanic | 124 | 73 |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 19 | 11 |
| Other, non-Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Multiracial, non-Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 11 |
| Education | ||
| Less than high school | 2 | 1 |
| High school diploma | 18 | 11 |
| Some college | 77 | 45 |
| College degree | 74 | 43 |
| Sexual orientation | ||
| Heterosexual | 154 | 91 |
| Gay or lesbian | 9 | 5 |
| Bisexual | 5 | 3 |
| Questioning | 1 | 1 |
| Did not respond | 2 | 1 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 96 | 56 |
| Widowed | 7 | 4 |
| Divorced | 34 | 20 |
| Separated | 5 | 3 |
| Never married | 18 | 11 |
| Living with partner | 11 | 6 |
| Current annual household income | ||
| $0–25,000 | 21 | 12 |
| >$25,000–$50,000 | 49 | 29 |
| >$50,000–$100,000 | 69 | 40 |
| >$100,000 | 32 | 19 |
| Military branch | ||
| Marines | 9 | 5 |
| Army | 66 | 39 |
| Navy | 44 | 26 |
| Air Force | 44 | 26 |
| Coast Guard | 5 | 3 |
| Did not respond | 3 | 1 |
| Combat exposure | ||
| Yes | 20 | 12 |
| No | 151 | 88 |
| Years of service | ||
| <1 | 12 | 7 |
| 1–2 | 32 | 19 |
| 3–4 | 50 | 29 |
| 5–10 | 39 | 23 |
| >10 | 36 | 22 |
| Did not respond | 2 | 1 |
| N of deployments (M±SD) | .58±.84 | |
| Sought mental health care | 46 | 27 |
| At VA facilitya | 18 | 39 |
| At non-VA facility | 33 | 72 |
| At both VA and non-VA facilities | 5 | 11 |
a
VA, Veterans Affairs.
| Score | Treatment- seeking | Psychological | Mental health | Perceived | Health care | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | M | SD | stigma | distress | literacy | need | use |
| Treatment-seeking stigmaa | 19.83 | 6.46 | — | ||||
| Psychological distressb | — | — | .23** | — | |||
| Mental health literacyc | 26.36 | 5.09 | −.36** | −.18* | — | ||
| Perceived need for cared | 1.78 | .41 | .19* | −.49** | −.13 | — | |
| Health care usee | .27 | .44 | −.27** | .44** | .15 | −.58** | — |
a
Negative beliefs about treatment seeking subscale of the Endorsed Anticipated Stigma Inventory. Possible scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more negative beliefs about treatment seeking.
b
Scores for distress were not included because the variable was z-scored.
c
Mental Health Literacy Scale. Possible scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating more mental health literacy.
d
Possible scores range from 1 (no perceived need) to 2 (perceived need).
e
Possible scores range from 0 (did not use care) to 1 (used care).
*
p<.05, **p<.01.
Results confirmed our hypothesis that after the analyses accounted for the role of psychological distress, women who reported higher mental health literacy endorsed less negative beliefs about treatment seeking (Figure 2; pathway H1; β=−0.33, SE=0.08, p<0.001). However, we did not find support for the proposed positive relationship between mental health literacy and perceived need for care (Figure 2; pathway H2) or between mental health literacy and mental health care utilization (Figure 2; pathway H3). However, results supported our hypotheses that women who endorsed more negative beliefs about treatment seeking also reported lower perceived need for care (Figure 2; pathway H4; β=−0.34, SE=0.11, p=0.003) and lower likelihood of health care utilization (Figure 2; pathway H5; β=−0.25, SE=0.11, p=0.02).
FIGURE 2. Final model representing the relationships among characteristics of female veterans and use of mental health servicesa
aH, hypothesis. Dotted paths are not statistically significant. Standardized indirect effect on service use by treatment-seeking stigma mediated through perceived need for care (β=−0.19, SE=0.08, 95% CI=−0.39 to −0.09); standardized indirect effect on service use by mental health literacy mediated through treatment-seeking stigma (β=0.08, SE=0.04, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.17); standardized indirect effect on service use by mental health literacy mediated through perceived need for care (β=0.11, SE=0.08, 95% CI=−0.05 to 0.09).
*p<0.05, **p<0.01.
We found partial support for the hypothesis that after the analyses accounted for the role of psychological distress in the model, perceived need for care would mediate the effect of both mental health literacy and treatment-seeking stigma on mental health care use (Figure 1). Perceived need for care mediated the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma and use (β=−0.19, SE=0.08, 95% CI=−0.39 to −0.09) to indicate that those who reported higher mental health literacy and lower treatment-seeking stigma perceived greater need for care and were therefore more likely to report service use.
However, perceived need for care did not mediate the association between mental health literacy and service use (β=0.11, SE=0.08, 95% CI=–0.05 to 0.09) because mental health literacy did not have a significant direct effect on perceived need for care and the CI for the indirect effect contained zero. Perceived need for care mediated the relationship between psychological distress and care utilization because the CI for the indirect effect did not contain zero (β=0.37, SE=0.12, 95% CI=0.18 to 0.57). Finally, mental health literacy had a significant indirect effect on service use through treatment-seeking stigma (β=0.08, SE=0.04, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.17).
Discussion
This study extends current knowledge on the role of mental health literacy, treatment-seeking stigma, and perceived need for care in female veterans’ service use within a longitudinal study. We demonstrated that mental health literacy reduces treatment-seeking stigma, and it indirectly increases female veterans’ likelihood of service use through its impact on treatment-seeking stigma. We also demonstrated that perceived need for care mediates the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma and service use among female veterans. Our findings extend stigma reduction theory by elucidating a mechanism in the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma reduction and increased health care use, suggesting that mental health literacy leads to reduced treatment-seeking stigma, which, in turn, is associated with increased perceived need for care, leading to increased likelihood of service use among female veterans.
Altogether, these results suggest that one way to reduce treatment-seeking stigma among female veterans is to target mental health literacy. Mental health literacy interventions such as Mental Health First Aid and beyondblue are designed to increase mental health knowledge, decrease stigma related to mental health problems and treatments, and increase willingness to refer to treatment (45–47). Findings reinforce the importance of these efforts and extend current knowledge by documenting that the impact of mental health literacy on service use is indirect, through reduced treatment-seeking stigma.
These findings also highlight perceived need for care as a key mechanism explaining the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma and service use among female veterans. Although treatment-seeking stigma has been identified as a key barrier to mental health care among both female and male veterans, few studies have examined exactly how any type of stigma affects treatment seeking. Our findings suggest that the extent to which female veterans endorse treatment-seeking stigma affects the extent to which they feel that they need mental health care, which, in turn, affects whether they seek mental health care. Future research examining other stigma mechanisms (e.g., anticipated stigma, internalized stigma) and cultural values (e.g., self-reliance) and their relationship with perceived need and service use is also important given recent research highlighting the potential contribution of cultural values to veterans’ endorsement of treatment-seeking stigma (20).
This study has several limitations. We did not include additional variables that may be particularly relevant for female veterans, such as their perceived level of comfort within the Veterans Affairs care setting (48, 49), or assess other cultural values that may influence health care behavior, such as exaggerated self-reliance. We also did not examine the role of logistical barriers to care in the associations between variables in this study. In addition, the health care use measure addressed whether veterans used any mental health care rather than the frequency, nature, or outcomes of their service use. Therefore, this study cannot determine whether mental health literacy, treatment-seeking stigma, or perceived need for care are predictive of retention in treatment or clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it is possible that individuals may underreport their frequency of health care use, a limitation of relying on self-reports.
In addition, this study examined the impact of mental health literacy on treatment-seeking stigma, but it is important to note that mental health stigma is complex and multidimensional, composed of different stigma mechanisms that may differentially affect outcomes for people experiencing mental health problems (15). It may be the case that other stigma mechanisms, such as anticipated and experienced stigma, also play a role in the relationship among mental health literacy, perceived need, and treatment seeking. Future research on how different stigma mechanisms operate together (or in process) is needed to optimize antistigma interventions to reduce stigma and increase treatment-seeking rates among civilians and veterans experiencing mental health problems. Finally, in our models, we statistically controlled for psychological distress, which is an important predictor of service use (50). However, it is also important to consider other predictors, such as functional impairment (51, 52).
There are several other valuable directions for future research. Specifically, it will be important to examine whether results generalize to female civilians as well as male veterans and civilian samples. Prior research suggests that treatment-seeking stigma may affect female and male veterans’ treatment seeking similarly (19); however, no research to our knowledge has examined the possibility of gender differences in the impact of mental health literacy on veterans’ experiences of stigma and treatment seeking. Future research should also examine whether findings vary on the basis of the nature and severity of diagnosis (15, 19) and as a function of race-ethnicity and related cultural values (53).
Another important next step will be to examine whether there are differences in the effectiveness of mental health literacy interventions at increasing perceived need for personal mental health care versus care for another person. Future studies should also assess treatment expectancy to distinguish the unique impact of mental health literacy (54). Given recent empirical research suggesting that framing mental health problems as treatable reduces social distance stigma and increases positive expectations about treatment (55), further research should test empirical methods to frame mental health concerns to reduce treatment-seeking stigma.
Conclusions
This study takes an important step in better understanding the relationship between treatment-seeking stigma and health care use among female veterans. Findings suggest that it is important to examine and develop targeted interventions that address the multiple and unique pathways toward treatment seeking among female veterans.
Footnote
These views represent the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the VA or the U.S. government.
References
1.
Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS: Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. JAMA 2006; 295:1023–1032
2.
Vogt D, Smith B, Elwy R, et al: Predeployment, deployment, and postdeployment risk factors for posttraumatic stress symptomatology in female and male OEF/OIF veterans. J Abnorm Psychol 2011; 120:819–831
3.
Vogt D, Vaughn R, Glickman ME, et al: Gender differences in combat-related stressors and their association with postdeployment mental health in a nationally representative sample of U.S. OEF/OIF veterans. J Abnorm Psychol 2011; 120:797–806
4.
Gerber MR, Iverson KM, Dichter ME, et al: Women veterans and intimate partner violence: current state of knowledge and future directions. J Womens Health 2014; 23:302–309
5.
Street AE, Gradus JL, Stafford J, et al: Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: data from a male-dominated environment. J Consult Clin Psychol 2007; 75:464–474
6.
Iverson KM, Vogt D, Dichter ME, et al: Intimate partner violence and current mental health needs among female veterans. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28:772–776
7.
Kimerling R, Gima K, Smith MW, et al: The Veterans Health Administration and military sexual trauma. Am J Public Health 2007; 97:2160–2166
8.
Lee DJ, Kearns JC, Wisco BE, et al: A longitudinal study of risk factors for suicide attempts among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans. Depress Anxiety 2018; 35:609–618
9.
Di Leone BAL, Wang JM, Kressin N, et al: Women’s veteran identity and utilization of VA health services. Psychol Serv 2016; 13:60–68
10.
Ryan ET, McGrath AC, Creech SK, et al: Predicting utilization of healthcare services in the Veterans Health Administration by returning women veterans: the role of trauma exposure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress. Psychol Serv 2015; 12:412–419
11.
Tanielian T, Jaycox LH (eds): Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery. Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2008
12.
Vogt D, Bergeron A, Salgado D, et al: Barriers to Veterans Health Administration care in a nationally representative sample of women veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21:S19–S25
13.
Washington DL, Farmer MM, Mor SS, et al: Assessment of the healthcare needs and barriers to VA use experienced by women veterans: findings from the national survey of women veterans. Med Care 2015; 53(suppl 1):S23–S31
14.
Washington DL, Yano EM, Simon B, et al: To use or not to use. What influences why women veterans choose VA health care. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(suppl 3):S11–S18
15.
Fox AB, Smith BN, Vogt D: How and when does mental illness stigma impact treatment seeking? Longitudinal examination of relationships between anticipated and internalized stigma, symptom severity, and mental health service use. Psychiatry Res 2018; 268:15–20
16.
Ingelse K, Messecar D: Rural women veterans’ use and perception of mental health services. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2016; 30:244–248
17.
Ouimette P, Vogt D, Wade M, et al: Perceived barriers to care among Veterans Health Administration patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Serv 2011; 8:212–223
18.
Vogt D: Mental health-related beliefs as a barrier to service use for military personnel and veterans: a review. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62:135–142
19.
Fox AB, Meyer EC, Vogt D: Attitudes about the VA health-care setting, mental illness, and mental health treatment and their relationship with VA mental health service use among female and male OEF/OIF veterans. Psychol Serv 2015; 12:49–58
20.
Krill Williston S, Roemer L, Vogt DS: Cultural and service factors related to mental health beliefs among post-9/11 veterans. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2019; 65:313–321
21.
Ashley W, Tapia J, Brown JLC, et al: Don’t fight like a girl: veteran preferences based on combat exposure and gender. Affilia 2017; 32:230–242
22.
Vogt D, Fox AB, Di Leone BAL: Mental health beliefs and their relationship with treatment seeking among US OEF/OIF veterans. J Trauma Stress 2014; 27:307–313
23.
Hochbaum GM: Public Participation in Medical Screening Programs: A Socio-psychological Study. Public Health Service pub no 572. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1958
24.
Molina Y, Scheel JR, Endeshaw M, et al: Enacted HIV-related stigma and breast-health beliefs and practices among African American women living with HIV: the mediating roles of internalized HIV-related stigma and depressive symptoms. Stigma Health 2018; 3:377–384
25.
Kim JE, Zane N: Help-seeking intentions among Asian American and white American students in psychological distress: application of the health belief model. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2016; 22:311–321
26.
Fikretoglu D, Guay S, Pedlar D, et al: Twelve month use of mental health services in a nationally representative, active military sample. Med Care 2008; 46:217–223
27.
Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, et al: “Mental health literacy”: a survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust 1997; 166:182–186
28.
Corrigan PW, Penn DL: Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Am Psychol 1999; 54:765–776
29.
Corrigan PW, Larson J, Sells M, et al: Will filmed presentations of education and contact diminish mental illness stigma? Community Ment Health J 2007; 43:171–181
30.
Uribe Guajardo MG, Slewa-Younan S, Kitchener BA, et al: Improving the capacity of community-based workers in Australia to provide initial assistance to Iraqi refugees with mental health problems: an uncontrolled evaluation of a mental health literacy course. Int J Ment Health Syst 2018; 12:2
31.
Coles ME, Coleman SL: Barriers to treatment seeking for anxiety disorders: initial data on the role of mental health literacy. Depress Anxiety 2010; 27:63–71
32.
Coles ME, Heimberg RG, Weiss BD: The public’s knowledge and beliefs about obsessive compulsive disorder. Depress Anxiety 2013; 30:778–785
33.
Coles ME, Schubert JR, Heimberg RG, et al: Disseminating treatment for anxiety disorders: step 1: recognizing the problem as a precursor to seeking help. J Anxiety Disord 2014; 28:737–740
34.
Reavley NJ, Jorm AF: Recognition of mental disorders and beliefs about treatment and outcome: findings from an Australian national survey of mental health literacy and stigma. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2011; 45:947–956
35.
KnowledgePanel® Design Summary. Nuremberg, Germany, GfK, 2013. images.politico.com/global/2014/09/12/knowledgepanelr-design-summary-description.pdf. Accessed Feb 19, 2019
36.
Iverson KM, Stirman SW, Street AE, et al: Female veterans’ preferences for counseling related to intimate partner violence: informing patient-centered interventions. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2016; 40:33–38
37.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH: The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995; 33:335–343
38.
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Boston, National Center for PTSD, 2013. www.ptsd.va.gov/ ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp. Accessed Aug 28, 2019
39.
Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1997; 1:385–401
40.
Vogt D, Di Leone BAL, Wang JM, et al: Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory (EASI): a tool for assessing beliefs about mental illness and mental health treatment among military personnel and veterans. Psychol Serv 2014; 11:105–113
41.
SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 25.0). Armonk, NY, IBM Corp, 2017
42.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, Muthén & Muthén, 2013
43.
Brown T: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, Guilford Press, 2006
44.
Taylor AB, MacKinnon DP, Tein JY: Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organ Res Methods 2008; 11:241–269
45.
Harman G, Heath J: Australian country perspective: the work of beyondblue and SANE Australia; in The Stigma of Mental Illness—End of the Story? Edited by Gaebel W, Rössler W, Sartorius N. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2017
46.
Kitchener BA, Jorm AF: Mental Health First Aid training: review of evaluation studies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006; 40:6–8
47.
Mohatt NV, Boeckmann R, Winkel N, et al: Military Mental Health First Aid: development and preliminary efficacy of a community training for improving knowledge, attitudes, and helping behaviors. Mil Med 2017; 182:e1576–e1583
48.
Vogt D, Bergeron A, Salgado D, et al: Barriers to Veterans Health Administration care in a nationally representative sample of women veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(suppl 3):S19–S25
49.
Kelly MM, Vogt DS, Scheiderer EM, et al: Effects of military trauma exposure on women veterans’ use and perceptions of Veterans Health Administration care. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23:741–747
50.
Pearson WS, Dhingra SS, Strine TW, et al: Relationships between serious psychological distress and the use of health services in the United States: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Int J Public Health 2009; 54(Suppl 1):23–29
51.
Hunkeler EM, Spector WD, Fireman B, et al: Psychiatric symptoms, impaired function, and medical care costs in an HMO setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2003; 25:178–184
52.
Singh JA, Borowsky SJ, Nugent S, et al: Health-related quality of life, functional impairment, and healthcare utilization by veterans: Veterans’ Quality of Life Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:108–113
53.
Abdullah T, Brown TL: Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: an integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 31:934–948
54.
De Nadai AS, King MA, Karver MS, et al: Addressing patient motivation, therapeutic alliance, and treatment expectancies in interventions for anxiety disorders; in The Wiley Handbook of Anxiety Disorders. Edited by Emmelkamp P, Ehring T. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell, 2014
55.
McGinty EE, Goldman HH, Pescosolido B, et al: Portraying mental illness and drug addiction as treatable health conditions: effects of a randomized experiment on stigma and discrimination. Soc Sci Med 2015; 126:73–85
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 30 August 2018
Revision received: 5 July 2019
Accepted: 8 August 2019
Published online: 29 October 2019
Published in print: February 01, 2020
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers: USA 14-275
Health Services Research and Developmenthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007217: CDA 10-029
This work was supported by the VA, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service as part of Dr. Iverson’s HSR&D Career Development Award (CDA-10-029) and her Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (USA-14-275).Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).