Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Utilization Patterns and Predictors Among Community-Dwelling Adults in the United States
Abstract
Objective:
Using benzodiazepines and opioids together substantially increases the risk of fatal overdose. Yet, concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid prescribing rates continue to increase amid the opioid overdose epidemic. Therefore, this study sought to identify patterns and predictors associated with self-reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use among community-dwelling adults.
Methods:
This retrospective, cross-sectional study used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2011, 2013, and 2015. The study population included adults (age ≥18) who did not die during the calendar year. The dependent variable was concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, which was identified with Multum Lexicon therapeutic class codes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of various individual-level factors with concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use.
Results:
The final study sample consisted of 44,808 individuals (unweighted), of which 680 (1.6%) (weighted frequency=7,806,636) reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. Several individual-level factors were significantly associated with reporting use of this combination. For example, individuals with anxiety were more likely to report using both benzodiazepines and opioids (odds ratio [OR]=9.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=7.37–12.5), and those with extreme pain levels were more likely to report concurrent use (OR=5.11, 95% CI=2.98–8.78). Other predictors of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use were depression, arthritis, region, race-ethnicity, insurance, activities disability, general and mental health status, and smoking status.
Conclusions:
Several individual-level factors were associated with reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. Therefore, enhanced educational interventions targeting both clinicians and community-dwelling adults are warranted to minimize use of this high-risk medication combination.
HIGHLIGHTS
•
More than seven million community-dwelling adults in the United States reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use during the study period (2011, 2013, and 2015).
•
Several individual-level factors were associated with an increased risk of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use.
•
Anxiety increased the risk of concurrent benzodiazepine and opiate use almost tenfold.
Opioid overdose rates have been on the rise over the past 2 decades (1), and several factors, such as concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, are associated with an increased risk of opioid overdose (2–4). In fact, more than 30% of opioid overdoses involve concurrent benzodiazepine use (5, 6). As benzodiazepine and opioid prescribing rates have increased over the past 2 decades (7, 8), so has the prevalence of fatal overdoses involving this medication combination (5, 9). This epidemic led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to issue new guidelines in 2016 recommending that clinicians avoid prescribing benzodiazepines and opioids together when possible to minimize the risk of fatal overdose.
A cross-sectional study by Agarwal and Landon (7) investigating patterns in outpatient benzodiazepine prescribing in the United States found that benzodiazepine and opioid coprescribing rates quadrupled from 2003 to 2015. However, this study only reported on predictors associated with benzodiazepine use, and it did not report on predictors of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use specifically. Of the studies that have reported individual-level predictors associated with concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use (10–12), only two have been conducted on a national level (12, 13). Both of these studies used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and found that, between 2015 and 2016, 8% of adults reported using both prescription opioids and benzodiazepines in the past year (12, 13). Certain sociodemographic characteristics, such as age, sex, marital status, education, and employment, were found to be associated with the use of these medications (12). However, other variables that may predict concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, such as medical and psychiatric comorbid conditions, were not analyzed.
Because concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use increases the risk of fatal overdose and because prescribing rates of this combination have continued to rise (7), there is a need to investigate what additional individual-level factors may be driving the use of this high-risk medication combination at the national level. The purpose of this study was to determine patterns and predictors of self-reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use among community-dwelling adults in the United States by using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. The results will help elucidate where more education is needed and where alternative resources for pain management and mental health care may be lacking.
Methods
Study Design and Sample
This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted with pooled data from MEPS (2011, 2013, and 2015). Alternate years of data were used to reduce the chance of the same respondent being included more than once (14), and multiple years of data were analyzed to achieve an adequate sample size (15). The study sample consisted of adults (age ≥18) who did not die during the calendar year. Human subjects review was not required for this study according to the University of Arizona Institutional Review Board.
Data Source
MEPS consists of large-scale surveys of families, individuals, their medical providers, and employers in the United States (16). Data are collected on the type, frequency, and cost of health services used by Americans via two major information sources: the household component (MEPS-HC) and the insurance component (MEPS-IC) (16). Additionally, the MEPS-HC is supplemented or replaced with information obtained from physicians, pharmacies, home health care providers, and hospitals via the medical provider component (MPC). MEPS-HC collects the following information: demographic characteristics, health status, health conditions, medical service use, charges and source of payments, health insurance coverage, income, employment, access to care, and satisfaction with care. MPC collects data on dates of visits and services, use of services, charges and sources of payments, and diagnoses and procedure codes documented for medical encounters. The primary use of MPC is to serve as an imputation source to supplement or replace household reported expenditure information, and it is not designed to yield national estimates.
Medication use was identified by using the MEPS prescribed medicines files. The following information was collected for each medication in each round: whether any free samples of the medicine were received; health problems the medicine was prescribed for; the number of times the prescription medicine was obtained or purchased; the year and month in which the person first used the medicine; and a list of the names, addresses, and types of pharmacies that filled the household’s prescriptions (17). Information regarding comorbid conditions was obtained from the MEPS medical conditions files (18). For our study, we used the HC files, prescribed medicines files, and medical conditions files. All files were merged by using a unique identifier (DUPERSID). We conducted our study at the individual level (unit of analysis).
Measures
Concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use constituted the dependent variable and was identified by Multum Lexicon therapeutic class codes. We used the third level of Multum Lexicon therapeutic class codes to identify benzodiazepines (code 69) and opioids (code 60 [narcotic analgesics] and code 191 [narcotic analgesic combinations]) (17).
Independent variables included age (18–25, 26–34, 35–49, 50–64, ≥65); gender (female, male); race-ethnicity (white, Hispanic, black, other); marital status (married, widowed, separated-divorced, never married); region (Northeast, Midwest, West, South); insurance type (private, public, uninsured); poverty status (poor [<100% of federal poverty level], near poor [100%–<125% of federal poverty level], low income [125%–<200% of federal poverty level], middle income [200%–<400% of federal poverty level], and high income [≥400% of federal poverty level]); body mass index (underweight/normal, overweight, obese); general health (fair/poor, good, excellent/very good); mental health (fair/poor, good, excellent/very good); smoking status (current smoker, other); activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (yes, no); instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) limitations (yes, no); activities disability (yes, no); pain level (quite/extreme, little/moderate, no pain); and diagnosis of arthritis, anxiety, depression, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, and thyroid disorders.
ADL limitations were defined as MEPS participants requiring help or supervision on any ADL (bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, getting in and out of bed, and mobility into own residence). IADL limitations were defined as MEPS participants requiring assistance paying bills, using the telephone, preparing light meals, doing laundry, going shopping, or taking medications. Activities disability was identified on the basis of whether MEPS participants had any limitations with work, housework, or schoolwork. General and mental health status were determined via a survey question asking MEPS participants to rate their health as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor (19). A comprehensive list of definitions for the data variables described here can be found elsewhere (19, 20).
Statistical Analysis
Chi-square tests were used to examine the differences in individual-level characteristics between the benzodiazepine and opioid, opioid only, benzodiazepine only, and no benzodiazepine or opioid groups. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to determine the individual-level characteristics associated with the benzodiazepine and opioid use group (reference group was no benzodiazepine or opioid) among community-dwelling adults in the United States. SAS, version 9.4 was used to conduct all analyses. Complex survey structure of MEPS was adjusted with SURVEYFREQ and SURVEYLOGISTIC procedures to obtain national-level estimates.
Results
A total of 44,808 (weighted frequency=477,679,360) individuals were included in the final study sample. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the benzodiazepine and opioid, opioid only, benzodiazepine only, and no benzodiazepine or opioid groups are presented in Table 1. In total, 680 (1.6%) (weighted frequency=7,806,636) adults reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use during the study period. Most MEPS participants were ages 50–64, female, white, and residing in the Southern region of the United States. Nearly half (48.1%) of the MEPS participants in the benzodiazepine and opioid group reported fair/poor general health status, whereas most participants (56.4%) in the no benzodiazepine or opioid group reported having excellent/very good general health status. Additionally, most MEPS participants (61.9%) in the benzodiazepine and opioid group reported an activities disability, which was not the case for the no benzodiazepine or opioid group (13.3%).
| Benzodiazepine and opioidb | Opioid onlyb | Benzodiazepine onlyb | No benzodiazepine or opioidb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | N | Wt% | N | Wt% | N | Wt% | N | Wt% | pc |
| Age | |||||||||
| 18–25 | 14 | 2.2 | 866 | 10.1 | 29 | 3.6 | 3,426 | 10.4 | <.001 |
| 26–34 | 53 | 6.0 | 1,325 | 13.0 | 98 | 10.1 | 4,260 | 12.0 | |
| 35–49 | 169 | 24.4 | 2,286 | 22.7 | 201 | 20.7 | 8,120 | 22.4 | |
| 50–64 | 261 | 39.2 | 2,827 | 31.3 | 281 | 32.9 | 9,858 | 29.3 | |
| ≥65 | 183 | 28.1 | 1,958 | 22.9 | 297 | 32.6 | 8,296 | 25.9 | |
| Gender | |||||||||
| Female | 471 | 63.8 | 5,680 | 57.3 | 617 | 67.0 | 20,109 | 57.2 | <.001 |
| Male | 209 | 36.2 | 3,582 | 42.7 | 289 | 33.0 | 13,851 | 42.8 | |
| Race-ethnicity | |||||||||
| White | 454 | 82.9 | 4,718 | 72.0 | 562 | 79.0 | 16,301 | 70.4 | <.001 |
| Black | 107 | 6.5 | 2,131 | 12.1 | 92 | 5.3 | 6,572 | 10.6 | |
| Hispanic | 88 | 6.9 | 1,800 | 10.2 | 203 | 12.0 | 7,800 | 12.0 | |
| Other | 31 | 3.7 | 613 | 5.7 | 49 | 3.7 | 3,287 | 7.0 | |
| Marital status | |||||||||
| Married | 297 | 51.4 | 4,293 | 52.0 | 436 | 50.3 | 17,816 | 56.8 | <.001 |
| Widowed | 88 | 12.9 | 805 | 7.9 | 106 | 10.7 | 2,814 | 7.9 | |
| Separated/divorced | 192 | 23.7 | 1,911 | 18.6 | 196 | 21.2 | 5,158 | 13.5 | |
| Never married | 103 | 12.0 | 2,253 | 21.5 | 168 | 17.8 | 8,172 | 21.8 | |
| Region | |||||||||
| Northeast | 75 | 12.5 | 1,252 | 14.6 | 129 | 15.4 | 5,924 | 19.2 | <.001 |
| Midwest | 163 | 25.7 | 2,055 | 23.8 | 208 | 24.0 | 6,826 | 22.3 | |
| South | 303 | 43.3 | 3,680 | 38.9 | 366 | 39.8 | 12,561 | 37.0 | |
| West | 139 | 18.4 | 2,275 | 22.7 | 203 | 20.8 | 8,649 | 21.6 | |
| Insurance | |||||||||
| Private | 308 | 54.6 | 5,050 | 64.7 | 522 | 65.5 | 21,195 | 72.6 | <.001 |
| Public | 337 | 40.4 | 3,324 | 27.9 | 312 | 27.5 | 9,202 | 20.2 | |
| Uninsured | 35 | 5.0 | 888 | 7.3 | 72 | 6.9 | 3,563 | 7.2 | |
| Poverty status | |||||||||
| Poor | 200 | 20.0 | 2,221 | 16.5 | 161 | 11.4 | 5,645 | 10.3 | <.001 |
| Near poor/low income | 188 | 26.1 | 2,209 | 20.2 | 220 | 20.8 | 6,933 | 15.8 | |
| Middle income | 160 | 25.5 | 2,466 | 27.7 | 267 | 30.7 | 10,046 | 29.0 | |
| High income | 132 | 28.4 | 2,366 | 35.6 | 258 | 37.2 | 11,336 | 44.9 | |
| BMI status | |||||||||
| Underweight/normal | 200 | 30.4 | 2,433 | 29.3 | 285 | 32.7 | 10,503 | 34.0 | <.001 |
| Overweight | 199 | 29.0 | 2,815 | 31.3 | 322 | 37.2 | 11,215 | 33.7 | |
| Obese | 275 | 40.6 | 3,870 | 39.3 | 282 | 30.1 | 11,558 | 32.3 | |
| General health status | |||||||||
| Excellent/very good | 120 | 19.0 | 3,410 | 41.0 | 352 | 43.7 | 17,065 | 56.4 | <.001 |
| Good | 210 | 32.9 | 2,959 | 31.8 | 310 | 35.4 | 11,156 | 30.5 | |
| Fair/poor | 350 | 48.1 | 2,893 | 27.2 | 244 | 20.9 | 5,738 | 13.1 | |
| Mental health status | |||||||||
| Excellent/very good | 206 | 34.5 | 4,817 | 55.8 | 383 | 46.2 | 20,812 | 65.3 | <.001 |
| Good | 247 | 37.3 | 2,972 | 30.2 | 303 | 32.9 | 9,951 | 27.0 | |
| Fair/poor | 227 | 28.2 | 1,473 | 14.0 | 220 | 20.9 | 3,195 | 7.7 | |
| Smoking status | |||||||||
| Current smoker | 229 | 33.8 | 2,065 | 22.6 | 178 | 22.3 | 4,342 | 13.6 | <.001 |
| Other | 417 | 66.2 | 6,544 | 77.4 | 648 | 77.7 | 26,586 | 86.4 | |
| ADL limitations | |||||||||
| Yes | 112 | 15.4 | 767 | 7.5 | 57 | 5.0 | 1,137 | 2.8 | <.001 |
| No | 568 | 84.6 | 8,480 | 92.5 | 849 | 95.0 | 32,781 | 97.2 | |
| IADL limitations | |||||||||
| Yes | 175 | 22.8 | 1,200 | 11.7 | 102 | 9.2 | 2,092 | 5.3 | <.001 |
| No | 505 | 77.2 | 8,054 | 88.3 | 804 | 90.8 | 31,834 | 94.7 | |
| Activities disability | |||||||||
| Yes | 432 | 61.9 | 3,124 | 31.5 | 285 | 27.3 | 5,059 | 13.3 | <.001 |
| No | 245 | 38.1 | 6,115 | 68.5 | 616 | 72.7 | 28,789 | 86.7 | |
| Pain groups | |||||||||
| Quite/extreme | 371 | 53.4 | 2,813 | 30.2 | 172 | 17.6 | 3,454 | 9.2 | <.001 |
| Little/moderate | 202 | 33.3 | 3,356 | 40.4 | 377 | 46.2 | 11,968 | 38.4 | |
| No pain | 76 | 13.3 | 2,520 | 29.4 | 285 | 36.2 | 15,802 | 52.4 | |
| Comorbid conditions | |||||||||
| Arthritis | 505 | 72.2 | 4,640 | 50.5 | 393 | 43.6 | 10,073 | 30.2 | <.001 |
| Anxiety | 479 | 69.8 | 1,489 | 17.1 | 620 | 69.7 | 3,681 | 12.1 | <.001 |
| Depression | 304 | 42.4 | 1,794 | 19.9 | 344 | 38.1 | 3,961 | 12.6 | <.001 |
| Cancer | 106 | 16.4 | 1,006 | 12.7 | 115 | 13.7 | 2,625 | 9.5 | <.001 |
| COPD | 233 | 34.2 | 1,607 | 17.5 | 188 | 20.1 | 4,378 | 13.5 | <.001 |
| Diabetes | 168 | 25.3 | 1,653 | 16.2 | 166 | 15.7 | 6,024 | 15.0 | <.001 |
| Heart disease | 219 | 32.8 | 1,655 | 18.1 | 200 | 21.7 | 4,688 | 14.8 | <.001 |
| Hypertension | 390 | 56.3 | 3,814 | 40.5 | 425 | 45.1 | 13,824 | 39.1 | <.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 303 | 47.6 | 2,781 | 31.4 | 345 | 38.4 | 10,590 | 31.9 | <.001 |
| Osteoporosis | 22 | 3.2 | 164 | 1.9 | 19 | 1.7 | 498 | 1.6 | .037 |
| Thyroid disorders | 128 | 19.5 | 880 | 11.4 | 129 | 14.6 | 3,275 | 11.0 | <.001 |
a
Source: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2011, 2013, and 2015. The total sample was composed of 44,808 (weighted N=477,679,360) adults (age ≥18) who were alive during the calendar year (2011, 2013, and 2015). ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; Wt%, weighted percentage.
b
NBenzodiazepine and opioid=680 (weighted N=7,806,636); NOpioid only=9,262 (weighted N=98,114,699); NBenzodiazepine only=906 (weighted N=10,353,654); and NNo benzodiazepine or opioid=33,960 (weighted N=361,404,371).
c
The p values represent statistical significance between the four groups on the basis of chi-square tests.
Findings from the multinomial logistic regression (Table 2) revealed that several individual-level factors were significantly associated with reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, including being white (odds ratio [OR]=1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.18–2.30), having private insurance (OR=1.68, 95% CI=1.02–2.74), having public insurance (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.01–2.70), living in the Southern region of the United States (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.11–2.63), having fair/poor general health (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.16–2.79), having good general health (OR=1.59, 95% CI=1.17–2.17), having fair/poor mental health (OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.42–0.89), smoking (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.29–2.26), having an activities disability (OR=2.68, 95% CI=1.94–3.70), having extreme pain (OR=5.11, 95% CI=2.98–8.78), having little/moderate pain (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.22–3.09), having arthritis (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.37–2.35), having anxiety (OR=9.61, 95% CI=7.37–12.5), and having depression (OR=1.42, 95% CI=1.05–1.92).
| Benzodiazepine and opioid | Opioid only | Benzodiazepine only | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | OR | 95% CIb | OR | 95% CIb | OR | 95% CIb |
| Age | ||||||
| 26–34 vs. 18–25 | 1.09 | .52–2.29 | .91 | .78–1.06 | 1.74 | .91–3.30 |
| 35–49 vs. 18–25 | 1.90 | .85–4.25 | .71 | .62–.83*** | 2.56 | 1.30–5.03** |
| 50–64 vs. 18–25 | 1.56 | .71–3.40 | .60 | .50–.72*** | 3.13 | 1.66–5.92*** |
| ≥65 vs. 18–25 | 1.04 | .42–2.58 | .43 | .36–.53*** | 4.19 | 2.18–8.06*** |
| Gender | ||||||
| Female vs. male | .99 | .75–1.29 | .96 | .88–1.04 | 1.25 | 1.02–1.52* |
| Race-ethnicity | ||||||
| White vs. other | 1.65 | 1.18–2.30** | 1.04 | .93–1.16 | 1.59 | 1.16–2.19** |
| Black vs. other | 1.01 | .67–1.52 | .84 | .74–.94** | 2.02 | 1.38–2.96*** |
| Hispanic vs. other | .93 | .48–1.81 | .80 | .69–.93** | 1.17 | .73–1.86 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Widowed vs. married | 1.04 | .70–1.56 | .92 | .80–1.06 | .92 | .65–1.32 |
| Separated/divorced vs. married | .98 | .75–1.28 | 1.15 | 1.05–1.26** | 1.22 | .96–1.55 |
| Never married vs. married | .76 | .53–1.09 | .89 | .80–1.00 | 1.26 | .95–1.68 |
| Region | ||||||
| Midwest vs. Northeast | 1.40 | .90–2.18 | 1.34 | 1.20–1.49*** | 1.52 | 1.07–2.16* |
| South vs. Northeast | 1.71 | 1.11–2.63* | 1.33 | 1.19–1.49*** | 1.63 | 1.15–2.32** |
| West vs. Northeast | 1.43 | .94–2.17 | 1.40 | 1.25–1.56*** | 1.38 | 1.00–1.90 |
| Insurance | ||||||
| Private vs. uninsured | 1.68 | 1.02–2.74* | 1.16 | 1.02–1.33* | .96 | .65–1.40 |
| Public vs. uninsured | 1.65 | 1.01–2.70* | 1.17 | 1.01–1.35* | .85 | .57–1.26 |
| Poverty status | ||||||
| Near poor/low income vs. poor | 1.07 | .81–1.43 | .98 | .88–1.09 | 1.48 | 1.08–2.04* |
| Middle income vs. poor | .89 | .62–1.27 | .87 | .77–.98* | 1.38 | .99–1.92 |
| High income vs. poor | .91 | .60–1.38 | .86 | .75–.98* | 1.25 | .86–1.82 |
| BMI | ||||||
| Overweight vs. underweight/normal | .81 | .61–1.08 | 1.09 | .99–1.20 | 1.07 | .87–1.33 |
| Obese vs. underweight/normal | .77 | .56–1.06 | 1.23 | 1.11–1.36*** | .78 | .61–.98* |
| General health status | ||||||
| Good vs. excellent/very good | 1.59 | 1.17–2.17** | 1.08 | .99–1.18 | 1.10 | .88–1.39 |
| Fair-poor vs. excellent/very good | 1.80 | 1.16–2.79** | 1.35 | 1.19–1.53*** | .96 | .67–1.37 |
| Mental health status | ||||||
| Good vs. excellent/very good | .82 | .59–1.14 | .87 | .80–.95** | .99 | .78–1.25 |
| Fair-poor vs. excellent/very good | .61 | .42–.89* | .73 | .64–.84*** | 1.08 | .77–1.51 |
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Current smoker vs. other | 1.71 | 1.29–2.26*** | 1.35 | 1.22–1.51*** | 1.50 | 1.16–1.93** |
| ADL limitations | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.42 | .92–2.18 | 1.52 | 1.21–1.91*** | 1.06 | .58–1.93 |
| IADL limitations | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | .93 | .66–1.33 | .99 | .83–1.18 | .83 | .51–1.36 |
| Activities disability | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 2.68 | 1.94–3.70*** | 1.55 | 1.40–1.72*** | 1.35 | 1.00–1.81 |
| Pain group | ||||||
| Quite/extreme vs. no pain | 5.11 | 2.98–8.78*** | 3.58 | 3.20–4.02*** | 1.20 | .83–1.74 |
| Little/moderate vs. no pain | 1.94 | 1.22–3.09** | 1.63 | 1.50–1.77*** | 1.24 | .96–1.60 |
| Arthritis | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.79 | 1.37–2.35*** | 1.75 | 1.61–1.89*** | 1.12 | .91–1.39 |
| Anxiety | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 9.61 | 7.37–12.5*** | 1.06 | .96–1.17 | 14.23 | 11.6–17.4*** |
| Depression | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.42 | 1.05–1.92* | 1.08 | .97–1.19 | 1.69 | 1.32–2.16*** |
| Cancer | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.20 | .84–1.71 | 1.34 | 1.17–1.52*** | 1.27 | .94–1.71 |
| COPD | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.31 | .96–1.78 | .97 | .89–1.05 | .91 | .71–1.17 |
| Diabetes | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.00 | .76–1.33 | .86 | .78–.95** | .88 | .68–1.15 |
| Heart disease | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.19 | .92–1.53 | .97 | .87–1.08 | 1.19 | .92–1.52 |
| Hypertension | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.06 | .80–1.42 | .87 | .80–.94*** | 1.04 | .82–1.31 |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.03 | .78–1.37 | .88 | .80–.96** | .90 | .72–1.13 |
| Osteoporosis | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | .85 | .43–1.68 | 1.14 | .83–1.57 | .49 | .24–1.00 |
| Thyroid disorders | ||||||
| Yes vs. no | 1.33 | .94–1.88 | .96 | .84–1.10 | .98 | .72–1.33 |
a
Source: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2011, 2013, and 2015. The total sample was composed of 44,808 adults (age≥18) who were alive during the calendar year (2011, 2013, and 2015). ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living.
b
Asterisks represent statistically significant group differences by type of treatment compared with the reference group on the basis of multinomial logistic regression at α=.05. The reference group for the dependent variable in the multinomial logistic regression was “no benzodiazepine or opioid.”
*
p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.
Discussion
Our findings estimate that during 2011, 2013, and 2015, more than seven million adults in the United States reported concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, and several individual-level factors were associated with an increased risk of using this combination. Many of these risk factors were modifiable, which is significant considering that the rate of prescribing this combination has quadrupled between 2003 and 2015 (7). Additionally, our study highlights that certain treatable health conditions may be significant predictors of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use along with other previously identified sociodemographic characteristics (12, 13).
The only nonmodifiable factor associated with an increased risk of concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use was being white. This is similar to Li et al.’s (12) study in which non-Hispanic white survey participants were more likely than other racial-ethnic groups to report concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. Previous studies have also found that white patients are more likely to be prescribed opioids each year (21) and are more likely to experience opioid overdose (22). However, patients from other racial-ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive prescription opioids than are white patients when presenting with the same symptoms (23, 24). One could infer that this pattern puts white Americans at a greater risk of developing an opioid use disorder and subsequent overdose.
Yet, although the prevalence of deaths due to opioid overdose has been higher among whites, the rate of opioid overdose deaths has actually been higher among blacks (25). It is therefore dangerous to label the current opioid epidemic as one predominantly affecting white communities because black individuals may simply be more likely to use illicit opioids over prescription opioids. Furthermore, racial-ethnic minority groups are often not portrayed the same as whites when discussing the tragedies surrounding addiction and overdose (26). For example, it is possible that white Americans are more likely to use benzodiazepines and opioids together because they are told more often that ongoing use is medically indicated (even if dependency has developed) compared with members of racial-ethnic minority groups.
Of all modifiable risk factors analyzed, anxiety was associated with the highest risk of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. This finding may be because individuals with chronic pain often develop anxiety (27), which benzodiazepines are commonly used to treat. However, there are safer medication alternatives for the treatment of anxiety, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), that do not increase the risk of respiratory depression when combined with opioids (28). Because SSRIs and SNRIs can take weeks to months to exert their clinical effect (29), it is not uncommon for health care providers to prescribe benzodiazepines, which provide rapid relief, adjunctively during the first few weeks of initiating an SSRI or SNRI medication (despite a lack of evidence to support this practice) (30).
It is also not uncommon for benzodiazepines to end up being prescribed longer than the recommended 2–4 weeks (30), indicating the difficulty that patients have in discontinuing them. This trend can be attributed to rebound anxiety symptoms that often occur with ongoing benzodiazepine use (31). Therefore, health care providers are faced with the challenge of helping patients with anxiety achieve timely symptom relief while minimizing the risk for benzodiazepine dependence. Our study findings reveal that patients with anxiety are not only at risk of being prescribed benzodiazepines long term (30) but are also at higher risk of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use compared with those without anxiety. Although the opioid epidemic has led to substantial nationwide efforts on improving pain management, these findings demonstrate that a similar effort is critically needed in improving the current approach for treating anxiety disorders.
Those with extreme as well as little/moderate pain were also at higher risk of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use compared with those with no pain. Research has shown that having chronic pain and comorbid anxiety is associated with more disabling pain compared with having chronic pain without comorbid anxiety (32). Chronic pain is complex because it has both sensory and cognitive dimensions (33). In fact, prior research has demonstrated that the brain regions involved in both emotional and cognitive modulation of pain are altered in those with chronic pain (34). As a result, individuals who experience psychological distress as a result of their pain are also at increased risk for central amplification of pain (33). Thus, although pain can lead to anxiety, anxiety can also worsen pain levels.
Furthermore, evidence suggests that benzodiazepines may increase the reinforcing and rewarding effects of opioids (35). Therefore, individuals reporting higher pain levels may seek to amplify the effects of opioids by using them with benzodiazepines. This practice may make it even more difficult for patients to taper off benzodiazepine and opioid regimens when transitioning to alternative treatments for pain and anxiety. Although the risk of overdose with concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use is highest during the initial few weeks of use (9), the longer use of these medications is continued, the more slowly they must be tapered off to avoid uncomfortable and unsafe withdrawal (36). Future research should investigate trends in the prevalence of short- versus long-term concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use.
Those with fair/poor or good general health compared with those who reported excellent/very good health were also more likely to report concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. Because greater medical comorbidity burden is associated with pain and mood disturbances (37), it makes sense that this category was associated with an increased risk of using this combination. In line with this finding, those who reported an activities disability were also more likely to report concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. A previous systematic review found that early opioid use for musculoskeletal disorders was associated with prolonged work disability (38). Additionally, Gebauer et al. (39) found that those receiving disability benefits were more likely to be continued on opioids long term and at higher morphine equivalent doses. This finding suggests that those with an activities disability are not only at increased risk of being continued on opioids but they are more likely to have prolonged disability. This outcome is significant when considering the high economic costs of pain resulting from lower economic productivity in the United States (40).
Individuals residing in the South were more likely to report concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use compared with other U.S. regions. This finding is in line with the study by Sun et al. (8), who found that concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use sharply increased between 2001 and 2013 among privately insured individuals in the United States. Because this study used MarketScan data, which are more likely to include individuals from the Southern region of the United States, the reported increase in concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use may have also been more prevalent in this region. Prescription opioid overdose rates have also reportedly been highest in the Southern region of the United States (41). Additionally, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2012 to 2014 (42), most regions with the highest estimates of serious mental illness in the United States were in the South. Prior research has shown that socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals with comorbid serious mental illness are frequently prescribed concurrent benzodiazepine and opioids and that this combination is associated with an increase in suicidal ideation (43). This trend may be due to limited community mental health resources available for these individuals (44), resulting in ongoing use of high-risk pharmacologic treatment strategies instead.
Previous studies have also shown that people with psychiatric disorders are at increased risk of opioid abuse and overdose (45–47). This finding highlights the connection between mental health and benzodiazepine and opioid use, and how it is important for policy makers to consider differences in mental health care needs across different U.S. regions to tackle this issue. A surprising finding from our study was that having fair/poor mental health compared with excellent/very good mental health was a protective factor in reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use. It is difficult to interpret why this might be, but it is possible that prescribers are more careful to avoid this medication combination in individuals with poor mental health status because they are aware that it may worsen the risk of suicidal ideation and overdose. Another possibility is that individuals reporting more positive mental health are being effectively treated with both benzodiazepines and opioids.
This study had several limitations that should be taken into consideration. The rationale for benzodiazepine and opioid use cannot be extracted from the MEPS database (e.g., insomnia vs. anxiety), and descriptions regarding which individual medications constituted the classifications “benzodiazepine” and “opioid” were not provided. Data regarding dosing frequency were not available, and reliable estimates could not be generated for whether a prescription was “as needed” because of underreporting of this variable. It also was not possible to determine whether concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid users were being tapered off their regimen or whether they may have been obtaining either medication illicitly. MEPS is a self-reported survey and as such has the possibility of recall bias. However, this recall bias is minimized by conducting the interviews regularly at an interval of 4–5 months. Lastly, the most recent MEPS data used in our study were from 2015, and it is likely that changes in benzodiazepine and opioid use patterns have occurred since then.
Conclusions
Several individual-level factors predicted the likelihood of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use in 2011, 2013, and 2015. Comorbid anxiety was associated with the highest risk of reporting concurrent benzodiazepine and opioid use, even more so than extreme pain. This finding suggests that further research and education are urgently needed on ways to improve the treatment of anxiety disorders in addition to pain management to effectively reduce the use of this dangerous medication combination.
References
1.
Gomes T, Tadrous M, Mamdani MM, et al: The burden of opioid-related mortality in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e180217
2.
Garg RK, Fulton-Kehoe D, Franklin GM: Patterns of opioid use and risk of opioid overdose death among Medicaid patients. Med Care 2017; 55:661–668
3.
Gudin JA, Mogali S, Jones JD, et al: Risks, management, and monitoring of combination opioid, benzodiazepines, and/or alcohol use. Postgrad Med 2013; 125:115–130
4.
Hawkins EJ, Goldberg SB, Malte CA, et al: New coprescription of opioids and benzodiazepines and mortality among Veterans Affairs patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2019; 80:18m12689
5.
Benzodiazepines and Opioids. North Bethesda, MD, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2018. www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/benzodiazepines-opioids#Reference. Accessed Jan 8, 2020
6.
Gladden RM, O’Donnell J, Mattson CL, et al: Changes in opioid-involved overdose deaths by opioid type and presence of benzodiazepines, cocaine, and methamphetamine—25 states, July–December 2017 to January–June 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:737–744
7.
Agarwal SD, Landon BE: Patterns in outpatient benzodiazepine prescribing in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e187399
8.
Sun EC, Dixit A, Humphreys K, et al: Association between concurrent use of prescription opioids and benzodiazepines and overdose: retrospective analysis. BMJ 2017; 356:j760
9.
Hernandez I, He M, Brooks MM, et al: Exposure-response association between concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine use and risk of opioid-related overdose in Medicare Part D beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e180919
10.
Ferries EA, Gilson AM, Aparasu RR, et al: The prevalence of and factors associated with receiving concurrent controlled substance prescriptions. Subst Use Misuse 2017; 52:1639–1645
11.
Carlson KF, Gilbert TA, Morasco BJ, et al: Linkage of VA and state prescription drug monitoring program data to examine concurrent opioid and sedative-hypnotic prescriptions among veterans. Health Serv Res 2018; 53(Suppl 3):5285–5308
12.
Li C, Santaella-Tenorio J, Mauro PM, et al: Past-year use of prescription opioids and/or benzodiazepines among adults in the United States: Estimating medical and nonmedical use in 2015–2016. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 204:107458
13.
Tardelli VS, Fidalgo TM, Santaella J, et al: Medical use, non-medical use and use disorders of benzodiazepines and prescription opioids in adults: differences by insurance status. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 204:107573
14.
MEPS-HC Sample Design and Data Collection Process. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, n.d. meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/hc_data_collection.jsp. Accessed Jan 8, 2020
15.
Sommers J: An Examination of State Estimates Using Multiple Years of Data From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Household Component. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006. meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_06004.pdf
16.
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Background. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019. meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/about_meps/survey_back.jsp. Accessed Jan 8, 2020
17.
MEPS HC-178A: 2015 Prescribed Medicines. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017. meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h178a/h178adoc.pdf
18.
MEPS HC-162: 2013 Medical Conditions. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015. meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h162/h162doc.pdf
19.
Nguyen MT, Chan WY, Keeler C: The association between self-rated mental health status and total health care expenditure: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample. Medicine 2015; 94:e1410
20.
MEPS HC-181: 2015 Full Year Consolidated Data File. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017. meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h181/h181doc.pdf
21.
Friedman J, Kim D, Schneberk T, et al: Assessment of racial/ethnic and income disparities in the prescription of opioids and other controlled medications in California. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:469–476
22.
Allen B, Nolan ML, Kunins HV, et al: Racial differences in opioid overdose deaths in New York City, 2017. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:576–578
23.
Todd KH, Deaton C, D’Adamo AP, et al: Ethnicity and analgesic practice. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35:11–16
24.
Prunuske JP, St Hill CA, Hager KD, et al: Opioid prescribing patterns for non-malignant chronic pain for rural versus non-rural US adults: a population-based study using 2010 NAMCS data. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:563
25.
James K, Jordan A: The opioid crisis in black communities. J Law Med Ethics 2018; 46:404–421
26.
Netherland J, Hansen H: White opioids: pharmaceutical race and the war on drugs that wasn’t. Biosocieties 2017; 12:217–238
27.
Stein MD, Kanabar M, Anderson BJ, et al: Reasons for benzodiazepine use among persons seeking opioid detoxification. J Subst Abuse Treat 2016; 68:57–61
28.
Locke AB, Kirst N, Shultz CG: Diagnosis and management of generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults. Am Fam Physician 2015; 91:617–624
29.
Fava M, Rush AJ, Alpert JE, et al: Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:342–351
30.
Bushnell GA, Stürmer T, Gaynes BN, et al: Simultaneous antidepressant and benzodiazepine new use and subsequent long-term benzodiazepine use in adults with depression, United States, 2001–2014. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:747–755
31.
Guina J, Rossetter SR, DeRhodes BJ, et al: Benzodiazepines for PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Pract 2015; 21:281–303
32.
de Heer EW, Gerrits MM, Beekman AT, et al: The association of depression and anxiety with pain: a study from NESDA. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106907
33.
Crofford LJ: Chronic pain: where the body meets the brain. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015; 126:167–183
34.
Bushnell MC, Ceko M, Low LA: Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14:502–511
35.
Jones JD, Mogali S, Comer SD: Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 125:8–18
36.
Puntillo K, Casella V, Reid M: Opioid and benzodiazepine tolerance and dependence: application of theory to critical care practice. Heart Lung 1997; 26:317–324
37.
Leong IY, Farrell MJ, Helme RD, et al: The relationship between medical comorbidity and self-rated pain, mood disturbance, and function in older people with chronic pain. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007; 62:550–555
38.
Carnide N, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, et al: Early prescription opioid use for musculoskeletal disorders and work outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2017; 33:647–658
39.
Gebauer S, Salas J, Scherrer JF, et al: Disability benefits and change in prescription opioid dose. Popul Health Manag 2019; 22:503–510
40.
Gaskin DJ, Richard P: The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 2012; 13:715–724
41.
Unick GJ, Ciccarone D: US regional and demographic differences in prescription opioid and heroin-related overdose hospitalizations. Int J Drug Policy 2017; 46:112–119
42.
Lipari RN, Van Horn SL, Hughes A, et al: State and Substate Estimates of Serious Mental Illness From the 2012–2014 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013. www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/report_3190/ShortReport-3190.html. Accessed April 15, 2020
43.
Spivak S, Cullen B, Eaton W, et al: Prescription opioid use among individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Res 2018; 267:85–87
44.
Access to Care Data. Alexandria, VA, Mental Health America, 2019. www.mentalhealthamerica.net/issues/mental-health-america-access-care-data. Accessed Jan 8, 2020
45.
Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Fan MY, et al: An analysis of heavy utilizers of opioids for chronic noncancer pain in the TROUP study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 40:279–289
46.
Becker WC, Sullivan LE, Tetrault JM, et al: Non-medical use, abuse and dependence on prescription opioids among US adults: psychiatric, medical and substance use correlates. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 94:38–47
47.
Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, et al: Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA 2011; 305:1315–1321
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 6 September 2019
Revision received: 8 January 2020
Revision received: 20 February 2020
Accepted: 26 March 2020
Published online: 10 June 2020
Published in print: October 01, 2020
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBLogin options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).