Skip to main content
Full access
Letters
Published Online: May 2013

The Need for Appropriate Use of Involuntary Commitment

To the Editor: In an article in the February issue, McGarvey and colleagues (1) reported the results of a study of factors that play a role in decisions to initiate involuntary commitment among emergency evaluators employed by community service boards in Virginia. The authors conclude, “The findings provide a sound empirical basis for the claim that investing in a continuum of crisis stabilization and other intensive outpatient services would reduce the need for involuntary interventions.” But the article does not provide data to support this conclusion.
And what was this study? It was a questionnaire completed by emergency clinicians throughout Virginia after they had conducted an evaluation. The questionnaire asked whether certain currently unavailable services would have better addressed the individual’s needs. Well, sure. We didn’t need a study to find that out. This study basically says: “Here’s what you currently have for resources. Now fantasize about all these other possible resources. If one of them were available, would this have better met the needs of the person you evaluated?” Is nirvana better than reality?
I have fantasized about, designed, and implemented services, and I have also evaluated the relationship between the conceptualized service and reality and examined outcomes (including outcomes in Virginia). And, like others, I know that it is a big stretch from conception (fantasy) to the delivered service.
In the study by McGarvey and colleagues, respondents were not asked: “Would you actually have been able to access the service for the individual? What would have been the impediments to obtaining the service? If it took three to four times longer to obtain the service than to involuntarily commit the individual, would you have been able to wait? Would the patient have been willing to use a proffered service voluntarily? Would there be financial impediments to using some of the alternatives?”
I am not saying that expanded, well-provided community services would not divert individuals from involuntary hospital admission to voluntary community services. But these community services might do such a good job at case finding that more individuals would end up being involuntarily admitted after the development of the community services than before. This was our conclusion when Massachusetts doubled its mobile crisis capacity with no subsequent decrease in inpatient hospitalization rates (2).
Finally, if psychiatrists don’t figure out how to appropriately use involuntary services, others will tell us what we must do. In the wake of Seung-Hui Cho’s massacre at Virginia Tech in 2007, many thought that too few involuntary treatments were available (3). The same has occurred in the wake of Adam Lanza’s shooting spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School (4).
We need to be at the table both to design effective involuntary interventions—those that we can actually use—in the hospital and in the community and to expand intensive community services. These can be complementary. They must be.

References

1.
McGarvey EL, Leon-Verdin M, Wanchek TN, et al.: Decisions to initiate involuntary commitment: the role of intensive community services and other factors. Psychiatric Services 64:120–126, 2013
2.
Fisher WH, Geller JL, Wirth-Cauchon J: Empirically assessing the impact of mobile crisis capacity on state hospital admissions. Community Mental Health Journal 26:245–253, 1990
3.
Fisher M: When laws create barriers to care, the consequences should be no surprise. Washington Post, April 20, 2007, p A12
4.
Change law on mental health (editorial). New Haven Register, Jan 12, 2013. Available at www.nhregister.com/articles/2013/01/12/opinion/doc50f20aae873fc487952997.txt

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services

Cover: Portrait of a Woman, by William Beckman, ca. 1988. Oil on board. Photo credit: Jerry L. Thompson/Art Resource, New York City.

Psychiatric Services
Pages: 496
PubMed: 23632582

History

Published in print: May 2013
Published online: 15 October 2014

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey L. Geller, M.D., M.P.H.
Dr. Geller is facility medical director, Worcester Recovery Center and Hospital, and professor in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share