Site maintenance Wednesday, November 13th, 2024. Please note that access to some content and account information will be unavailable on this date.
Skip to main content
Full access
Clinical & Research News
Published Online: 20 December 2002

Canadian Psychiatrists Urged to Voice Views on Cloning, Stem Cell Research

A bill to regulate human stem cell research and ban human cloning was introduced into the Canadian Parliament in May. As things look now, it will become law during the next several months.
Timothy Caulfield: “I hope all of you will become engaged in this important debate.”
This news comes from Timothy Caulfield, an associate professor of law at the University of Alberta in Edmonton and research director of the university’s Health Law Institute. He spoke at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychiatric Association in November in Banff, Alberta.
If Canadian psychiatrists hold views on human stem cell research and human cloning, they should write their legislators about them, and soon, Caulfield said.
Individual letters from physicians carry considerable weight with legislators, he stressed. “I hope all of you will become engaged in this important debate,” he said.
Caulfield said that he finds parts of the bill reasonable—for instance, it does not ban human stem cell research completely. However, he finds some other aspects of the bill most troubling. For example, he believes that it is based on questionable moral positions and has some quirky provisions—say, it would allow a human embryonic stem cell to be placed in a mouse embryo, but a mouse embryonic stem cell could not to be placed in a human embryo.
He also holds that there are some critical ethical questions surrounding the research that the bill does not address and gave an example: “Because each cell in our bodies could potentially be cloned into a human being, are we walking human embryos?”
But what disturbs Caulfield most about the bill, he implied, is that it would criminalize such research and, once enacted into law, would be difficult to change.
Nonetheless, he does not believe that scientists should be able to engage in such research totally unfettered, but the restrictions should consist of government regulations, not statutory prohibitions, he opined. ▪

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 20 December 2002
Published in print: December 20, 2002

Notes

A health law authority urges Canadian psychiatrists to send their opinions on human stem cell research and cloning to their legislators to influence the outcome of a bill now under consideration.

Authors

Details

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share