“A Light at the End of the Tunnel”: Experiences With Peer Specialists in the Open Dialogue Model
Abstract
Objective:
The authors examined participants’ experiences with peer specialists in Parachute NYC, a community mental health program of support teams trained in Open Dialogue and intentional peer support.
Methods:
Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight enrollees and 10 network members (enrollees’ family members). All excerpts coded as pertaining to peers were thematically analyzed.
Results:
Experiences with peer specialists were mostly positive. Participants especially valued peers’ relatability and tendency to instill hope and engender empathy among enrollees and network members; peers’ ability to foster community connections was also highly regarded. Generally, enrollees benefited from having peers and other health care professionals on a Parachute team because of their different forms of expertise. Concerns about peer specialists in dialogic care were reported by some network members, who questioned peers’ degree of shared experiences, professionalism, and contributions to team unity.
Conclusions:
Despite generally positive findings, the optimal role for peers within the Open Dialogue model needs further exploration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 13 March 2023
Revision received: 25 May 2023
Accepted: 1 August 2023
Published online: 27 September 2023
Published in print: March 01, 2024
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.