Skip to main content
Full access
Articles
Published Online: 2 March 2020

Selection Into Mental Health Services Among Persons With Depression

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to identify sociodemographic and health characteristics associated with use of different mental health services (medication only, counseling only, or both) among persons with depression.

Methods:

The analytic sample consisted of adults who had a major depressive episode in the past year and received outpatient professional mental health services (N=4,169). Multinomial logistic regressions were computed with data from the 2015 and 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to identify factors associated with the relative odds of receiving each modality of mental health service.

Results:

Sixty-nine percent of the sample received both prescription medication and counseling (talking to a professional health care provider about depression), 22% received counseling only, and 9% received medication only. Being ordered into care and higher probability of having a severe mental illness were associated with higher odds of receiving both medication and counseling.

Conclusions:

How people with depression enter care and select into different mental health service modalities might be an indicator of access. Factors that affect selection into these modalities might also be associated with outcomes of care. Findings could inform efforts to remove modality-specific barriers to treatment, improve timely access to care, and reduce unmet need for mental health care among persons with depression.

HIGHLIGHTS

How people with depression enter into care, whether independently or by coercion, influences the specific type of mental health services they receive.
Sociodemographic characteristics of people with depression, such as age, residential area, and ethnicity, are associated with the modality of mental health service (medication, counseling, or both) they receive.
Understanding factors that influence selection into different treatment modalities might help improve access to psychiatric services and reduce unmet need.
In 2016, 6.7% of adults in the United States had at least one major depressive episode. For two-thirds of this population, depression interfered significantly with the ability to manage their home, work, or social lives (1). Even though treatment rates for depression continue to increase (24), less than half of adults who have had an episode of major depression receive any treatment. The most common outpatient mental health services, or treatment modalities, for depression include prescription medication and group or individual counseling, either alone or in combination (57). Numerous studies have examined factors that predict who receives treatment for depression (812). While informative, this research does not explain how people come to receive different types of services once they have engaged nor does it identify the characteristics that distinguish between persons who receive different services among those in treatment. How people select into mental health services and modalities of care may also be an indicator of access. Understanding these factors might help clinicians, policy makers and administrators remove modality-specific barriers to care and increase timely entry into mental health services. In this study, we aimed to identify characteristics of patients with depression that are associated with different types of mental health services or treatment modalities (medication, counseling, or counseling and medication).

Methods

Data

Data were obtained from the 2015 and 2016 samples of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The NSDUH is an annual multistage area-probability sample survey that estimates the prevalence of substance use, mental health issues, and use of mental health services among the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States (1). Response rates were 55.2% in 2015 and 53.5% in 2016. Our analytic sample consisted of adults who met the criteria of having had a major depressive episode in the past year and having received outpatient professional mental health services in the form of prescription medication and/or counseling (N=4,169). Institutional review board approval was not needed because these data are publicly available and deidentified.

Measures

Respondents were asked about outpatient treatment, counseling, and any prescription medication they received for their mental health from a doctor or other health professional in the past 12 months. We created a mutually exclusive variable for treatment modality: “medication only,” if the respondent received only prescription drugs for their symptoms; “counseling only, no medication,” if the respondent reported seeing or talking to a health professional about his or her symptoms but did not receive any prescription medications; and “medication and counseling,” if the respondent received prescription drugs and talked to a professional about his or her symptoms.
We created three mutually exclusive pathways into care, and patients were asked which best describes how they entered care: “independent,” if respondents decided on their own to receive treatment; “asked by someone,” if respondents received care because someone else thought they should; and ”ordered,” if respondents were ordered to receive treatment. Sociodemographic variables included race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black/African American, Latinx/Hispanic, and other), age (18–25, 26–34, 35–49, 50–64, ≥65 years), residential area (large metro, small metro, nonmetro), level of education (less than high school, high school graduate, some college, college graduate), employment status (not looking/not in labor force, unemployed, employed), and poverty level (<100% of the federal poverty level [FPL], 100%−199% FPL, and ≥200% FPL). Health status variables included self-rated health (poor/fair versus good/very good/excellent), health insurance status (insured versus uninsured), whether he or she met DSM-5 criteria for substance abuse or dependence (yes or no), probability of having a severe mental illness (0.0–0.9), and whether the respondent received inpatient mental health treatment in the past year (yes or no). All these variables could be determined from the public-use data files, including the probability of having a severe mental illness, which was computed by factoring in the occurrence of a past-year major depressive episode, responses to questions that assessed serious thoughts of suicide in the past year, and the participant’s scores on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule to assess both psychological distress and disability.

Analyses

We describe demographic, socioeconomic, and health status characteristics of respondents who received only prescription medication, those who received only counseling, and those who received both medication and counseling. We used multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with the relative log odds of receiving each type of treatment. In all analyses, weights were employed to represent the population from 2015 to 2016, and standard errors (SEs) were adjusted to account for the complex survey design.

Results

Characteristics of the sample of respondents who used professional outpatient mental health services for depression are presented in Table 1. As shown, 9% of respondents received prescription medication only, 22% received counseling only, and 69% received both medication and counseling.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of adults with depression (N=4,169), by treatment modalitya
 Medication only (N=371)Counseling only (N=1,012)Medication and counseling (N=2,786)Total (N=4,169)
CharacteristicN%N%N%N%
Pathway into care        
 Independent23686.151380.42,13282.52,74482.4
 Asked by someone5812.210414.535012.551712.8
 Ordered221.7335.11645.12304.8
Race-ethnicity        
 Non-Hispanic white27074.665166.6**2,14080.53,06176.9
 Non-Hispanic black/African American267.110510.31967.23277.9
 Latinx/Hispanic4614.015815.02497.945310.0
 Other294.3988.1*2014.43285.2
Age        
 18–25 years12414.542823.280712.41,35915.0
 26–34 years6313.621820.657815.585916.4
 35–49 years10123.825327.792631.21,28029.7
 50–64 years5934.39423.5**36229.651528.7
 ≥65 years2413.8195.0**11311.415610.2
Sex        
 Male10630.129932.769828.11,10329.3
 Female26569.971367.32,08871.93,06670.7
Residential area        
 Large metro13542.848660.7*1,15851.5*1,77952.7
 Small metro14641.436428.7**1,02932.51,53932.5
 Nonmetro9015.816210.659916.085114.8
Education        
 Less than high school5213.912212.328010.345411.0
 High school graduate10731.322020.564521.097221.8
 Some college14333.640536.71,16440.51,71239.0
 College graduate6921.226530.5***69728.21,03128.1
Employment        
 Employed full-time14032.944344.5*99632.51,57935.2
 Employed part-time7217.624320.150814.282315.8
 Unemployed316.1625.11884.72814.9
 Not in labor force12843.426430.21,09448.51,48644.1
Poverty level        
 <100% FPL8822.125423.768421.61,02622.1
 100%–199% FPL9822.624324.166222.71,00323
 ≥200% FPL18555.349152.21,41455.82,09054.9
Health insurance        
 No4311.010411.12086.2**3557.7
 Yes32889.090888.92,57893.8*3,81492.3
Self-rated health        
 Fair or poor13631.450543.5*99830.51,63933.5
 Good, very good, or excellent23568.650756.5*1,78869.52,53066.5
Substance use disorder        
 No27881.177579.62,10180.03,15480.0
 Yes9318.923720.468520.01,01520.0
Probability of severe mental illness (mean±SE)b0.26±0.03 0.19±0.02 0.49±0.01** 0.27±0.02 
Received inpatient treatment        
 No35195.398598.22,49491.73,83093.5
 Yes204.7251.8*2918.3*3366.5
a
FPL, federal poverty level. Table presents unweighted sample sizes and weighted percentages.
b
Probability of severe mental illness was computed by factoring in the occurrence of a past-year episode of major depression, responses to questions that assessed serious thoughts of suicide in the past year, and the participant’s scores on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule to assess psychological distress and disability.
*
p≤.05, **p≤.01, ***p≤.001, for a significant difference from those who received medication only.
Table 1 also shows differences in patient characteristics by treatment type. Persons who used only counseling were less likely to be white and younger and more likely to be college graduates, to be employed full-time, to live in large metropolitan regions, and to have worse self-rated health than those who used only medication. Persons who received both types of treatment were more likely to live in a large metropolitan region, to be insured, and to have greater average probability of severe mental illness compared with persons who received only medication.
Table 2 shows factors associated with treatment modality. The relative odds (RO) of receiving counseling and of receiving both medication and counseling compared with receiving prescription medication alone were greater among persons who were ordered into care than among those who sought mental health care independently, with analyses controlling for socioeconomic and health characteristics. Latinx/Hispanic respondents had greater relative odds of receiving counseling than medication compared with non-Hispanic whites (RO=3.37, SE=1.60). Persons ages 50 years and older were more likely to receive medication than counseling alone compared with those between the ages of 18 and 25. Similarly, compared with living in a large metropolitan area, living in a nonmetropolitan area was associated with lower adjusted odds of counseling relative to medication (RO=0.43, SE=0.10). Odds of receiving both medication and counseling increased with greater probability of having a severe mental illness (RO=1.21, SE=0.19).
TABLE 2. Relative odds (RO) of receiving counseling only or both medication and counseling compared with medication only among adults with depression (N=4,169)
 Counseling onlyMedication and counseling
CharacteristicROSEROSE
Pathway into care (reference: independent)    
 Asked by someone1.25.331.02.22
 Ordered3.64*1.773.53***1.25
Race-ethnicity (reference: non-Hispanic white)    
 Non-Hispanic Black/African American1.04.46.49.22
 Latinx/Hispanic3.37*1.601.21.51
 Other2.151.13.89.45
Age (reference: 18–25 years)    
 26–34 years.83.241.28.29
 35–49 years.66.161.40.30
 50–64 years.39*.15.98.26
 ≥65 years.12***.07.81.31
Sex (reference: male)    
 Female.75.18.97.19
Residential area (reference: large metro)    
 Small metro.66.16.73.16
 Nonmetro.43**.10.84.17
Education (reference: <high school)    
 High school graduate.58.24.62.21
 Some college1.04.411.34.39
 College graduate1.46.701.44.49
Employment (reference: full-time)    
 Employed part-time.81.25.83.21
 Unemployed.56.21.92.27
 Not in labor force.84.231.48.37
Poverty level (reference: <100% FPL)a    
 100%–199% FPL.99.291.02.29
 ≥200% FPL.84.321.13.37
Health insurance (reference: insured)    
 Uninsured1.11.371.42.35
Self-rated health (reference: good, very good, or excellent)    
 Fair or poor.67.151.01.18
Substance use problem (reference: no)    
 Yes.94.241.00.21
Probability of severe mental illness.98.311.21**.18
Received inpatient treatment (reference: no)    
 Yes2.04.91.64.27
a
FPL, federal poverty level.
*
p≤.05, **p≤.01, ***p≤.001.

Discussion

Respondents’ severity of mental illness, pathway into care, race-ethnicity, residential area, and age were associated with treatment modality. Studies based on randomized controlled trials have suggested that among persons with severe mental illnesses, combined treatment is more efficacious (13). In an observational study such as ours, the finding that a higher probability of having a severe mental illness increased the likelihood of receiving both medication and counseling is reassuring. Being ordered into care was associated with receiving both medication and counseling. People might be ordered into mental health service modalities that specifically require frequent interaction with providers, given that coercion, although ethically questionable, expedites engagement with services (14). Latinx/Hispanic respondents were more likely to receive counseling than medications, consistent with lower rates of antidepressant use among this population in general (15, 16). Latinx/Hispanic people also tend to use professional mental health services for long-term coping and when they trust the interpersonal skills of the mental health service provider (17). These conditions might more easily be met in counseling than with medication. Findings regarding place of residence are consistent with prior research suggesting that people in rural areas are more likely to use medications (18) because of the shortage of mental health professionals and the elevated levels of stigma associated with mental illness in these areas (18, 19). The finding that adults age 50 years and older are less likely than persons 18 to 25 to use counseling is also consistent with the steady increase in antidepressant use among adults and the decline in use of psychotherapy, especially among persons age 35 and older (3, 5, 20, 21).
These findings should be interpreted in light of certain limitations. First, use of mental health services, including different treatment modalities, might depend on factors beyond the patient socioeconomic, demographic, and health characteristics that were included in this analysis. Although we assessed comorbid substance use disorder, assessing other mood and anxiety disorders as well as stress-related conditions that co-occur with depression would have strengthened the analyses. Characteristics of mental health systems and health insurance plans and the availability and types of providers may also be factors shaping patients’ use of different types of mental health services, but this information was not available in the data. Second, although nonresponse weights included in the analyses adjusted for nonresponse to the NSDUH, some of the bias introduced at different stages of the multistage sampling may not have been corrected. In addition, persons with severe mental health problems are less likely than those without severe mental illnesses to be captured in population-based surveys such as the NSDUH. For example, people at risk of severe mental illnesses, such as those who are homeless and/or reside in shelters, are incarcerated, or are otherwise institutionalized, are not included in the NSDUH. Finally, we did not include persons who were surveyed and treated with medication, counseling, or therapy in an inpatient setting only.

Conclusions

How a person enters care, severity of symptoms, race-ethnicity, age, and place of residence influence the specific type of mental health service a patient receives for depression. Understanding how health and sociodemographic characteristics influence selection into different kinds of services and treatment modalities might help improve psychiatric services, thereby reducing the burden of untreated depression. The literature on patterns of use of psychiatric services has helped researchers and clinicians to predict individuals’ probability of seeking care. Findings from this study suggest that factors such as how people enter care (independently or via coercion) are associated with the kind of services they receive. We broadened the scope of “access to treatment” by exploring selection into treatment. There may be benefits to increasing concurrent access to both modalities of mental health services, especially for people who are more likely to be ordered into care. Finally, beyond assessing patients’ selection into treatment, research should also identify which treatment approaches might work for whom. Research that explores the connection between selection into mental health services, treatment efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes of treatment is warranted.

References

1.
2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2016
2.
Olfson M, Marcus SC, Druss B, et al: National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression. JAMA 2002; 287:203–209
3.
Marcus SC, Olfson M: National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:1265–1273
4.
Mojtabai R, Olfson M, Han B: National trends in the prevalence and treatment of depression in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics 2016; 138:e20161878
5.
Olfson M, Blanco C, Marcus SC: Treatment of adult depression in the United States. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1482–1491
6.
Gelenberg AJ: A review of the current guidelines for depression treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:e15
7.
Williams JW Jr, Maslow G: Seize the day to implement depression guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:372–373
8.
Mojtabai R, Eaton WW, Maulik PK: Pathways to Care: Need, Attitudes, Barriers. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012
9.
Byers AL, Lai AX, Nelson C, et al: Predictors of mental health services use across the life course among racially-ethnically diverse adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 25:1213–1222
10.
McAlpine DD, Mechanic D: Utilization of specialty mental health care among persons with severe mental illness: the roles of demographics, need, insurance, and risk. Health Serv Res 2000; 35:277–292
11.
Mackenzie CS, Gekoski WL, Knox VJ: Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: the influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging Ment Health 2006; 10:574–582
12.
Alang SM, McAlpine DD: Pathways to mental health services and perceptions about the effectiveness of treatment. Soc Ment Health 2018; 9:388–407
13.
Thase ME, Greenhouse JB, Frank E, et al: Treatment of major depression with psychotherapy or psychotherapy-pharmacotherapy combinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:1009–1015
14.
Valenti E, Banks C, Calcedo-Barba A, et al: Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015; 50:1297–1308
15.
Olfson M, Marcus SC: National patterns in antidepressant medication treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66:848–856
16.
Hodgkin D, Volpe-Vartanian J, Alegría M: Discontinuation of antidepressant medication among Latinos in the USA. J Behav Health Serv Res 2007; 34:329–342
17.
Cabassa LJ, Zayas LH: Latino immigrants’ intentions to seek depression care. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2007; 77:231–242
18.
Fortney JC, Harman JS, Xu S, et al: The association between rural residence and the use, type, and quality of depression care. J Rural Health 2010; 26:205–213
19.
Stewart H, Jameson JP, Curtin L: The relationship between stigma and self-reported willingness to use mental health services among rural and urban older adults. Psychol Serv 2015; 12:141–148
20.
Mojtabai R, Olfson M: National trends in psychotherapy by office-based psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:962–970
21.
Olfson M, Blanco C, Wang S, et al: National trends in the mental health care of children, adolescents, and adults by office-based physicians. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:81–90

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services
Psychiatric Services
Pages: 588 - 592
PubMed: 32114942

History

Received: 1 May 2019
Revision received: 19 December 2019
Accepted: 3 January 2020
Published online: 2 March 2020
Published in print: June 01, 2020

Keywords

  1. depression
  2. differential therapeutics, pathways into care
  3. access to treatment

Authors

Details

Sirry Alang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (Alang); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (McAlpine); Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (McCreedy).
Donna McAlpine, Ph.D.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (Alang); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (McAlpine); Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (McCreedy).
Ellen McCreedy, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (Alang); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (McAlpine); Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (McCreedy).

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Alang ([email protected]).
This study was presented in part at the Fourteenth Workshop on Costs and Assessment in Psychiatry, March 29–31, 2019, Venice, Italy.

Competing Interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share