Spatial Working Memory in Asymptomatic HIV-Infected Subjects
Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract
Many clinical and research findings converge to indicate that frontal lobe, basal ganglia, and related neuronal connections are primarily involved in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; frontal lobe, mainly the prefrontal cortex, has a specialized role in working memory processes. This study focused on neuropsychological evaluation of the spatial component of working memory in a sample of 34 asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects as compared with 34 age- and sex-matched seronegative control subjects. A computer-administered test assessing spatial working memory was used for the neuropsychological evaluation. The findings did not show any spatial working memory impairment during the asymptomatic phase of HIV infection.
Much clinical and basic science evidence indicates the involvement of frontal lobe, basal ganglia, and related neuronal connections in HIV-seropositive individuals.1–15
Frontal lobe, mainly the prefrontal cortex, has a specialized role in working memory (WM) processes.16–19 WM is a complex memory system that supports higher cognitive functioning and therefore enables us to perform complex cognitive skills; on the basis of behavioral, neuropsychological, and functional neuroimaging data, three different WM systems—verbal WM, spatial WM, and object recognition WM—have been characterized.20
A few neuropsychological studies have evaluated WM in HIV-infected individuals, and all of them found working memory impairment only in symptomatic subjects.21–23 These findings are in agreement with overall neuropsychological data relative to HIV infection, which indicate a significant proportion of symptomatic subjects are compromised in their cognitive functioning. However, a substantial number of studies found that a subsample of asymptomatic individuals may have mild to moderate impairment in memory, information processing speed, and some other specific cognitive areas that are independent of other confounding factors (such as depression or history of head trauma) and are in some cases significant predictors of mortality.24 Furthermore, asymptomatic subjects without evidence of immune compromise do not appear to be at greater risk of cognitive impairment than HIV-negative control subjects, whereas for those HIV-infected individuals who are immune-compromised (even while asymptomatic), there seems to be increased risk of neuropsychological impairment.25
To the best of our knowledge, no study exists in the literature assessing the spatial component of WM in the course of HIV infection. In the present study we focused on the neuropsychological evaluation of spatial WM in a group of asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects as compared with a sample of age- and sex-matched seronegative control subjects; we enrolled only asymptomatic subjects, with the aim of assessing whether HIV could result in dysfunction in spatial working memory even in the asymptomatic phase of the illness.
METHODS
Subjects
Table 1 shows the clinical and demographic characteristics of the study samples. Thirty-four asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects (i.e., belonging to stages A1 and A2 according to the AIDS surveillance case definition for adolescents and adults, 199326) and 34 age- and sex-matched seronegative control subjects were enrolled in this study. Subjects' serostatus was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with Western blot confirmation of positive results. Subjects were recruited from the Infectious Diseases Department of San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy); control subjects were recruited from hospital personnel. Subjects gave their consent to the study after all the procedures were fully explained.
Exclusion criteria were a personal history of psychiatric and/or neurological disorders, head trauma, learning disability, or recent alcohol and drug abuse. As a part of the enrolling procedures, subjects were administered the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Ham-D) and 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); subjects who gained a Ham-D score ≥10 and/or a BPRS score ≥21 were excluded from the study.
All subjects were right-handed, handedness having been assessed by means of the Raczkowsky questionnaire.27
Procedures
Figure 1 shows the experimental procedure (modified) that we used to assess spatial WM.28 The subject begins by fixating a cross in the center of a computer screen for 500 milliseconds; then, three randomly arrayed dots on the circumference of an imaginary circle centered on the cross appear, which remain on the screen for only 200 ms. A retention interval of 3,000 or 9,000 ms follows, during which the subject has to keep in mind the spatial location of the three dots. At the end of this interval, a location probe appears on the screen, consisting of a single circle that either encircles the location of one of the previous dots or does not. The subject's task is to press a key with the dominant hand if the probe encircles the location of a target dot or with the nondominant hand if it does not. The probe circle is either centered directly on the location of a previously presented dot or it misses the nearest dot location by 40 degrees; the subject has to give an answer within 1,500 ms. After the subject presses the key, a new sequence with different point location starts and the entire procedure is repeated.
Prior to the evaluation, each subject was given verbal instructions together with a single training session during which subjects were consecutively administered 10 tests. Subjects were judged to be well trained if they were able to correctly repeat and carry out the verbal instructions and if the total number of errors was less than 3. At the end of these training sessions all subjects were convincingly well trained, and none was excluded.
During the evaluation, subjects were first administered a set of 20 consecutive tests, each characterized by a retention interval of 3,000 ms, and then a second set of 20 consecutive tests, each characterized by a retention interval of 9,000 ms. Mean number of errors and mean response time for each subject were computed for the two sets of tests.
Digit Span test was administered to subjects in an attempt to ensure cognitive comparability between the two groups; no differences were recorded between seropositive individuals and control subjects (Mann-Whitney U-test: P=0.452).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov procedure was used to test whether neuropsychological data were normally distributed; since this procedure showed that these neuropsychological data were not normally distributed, nonparametric tests were selected for data analysis.
Number of errors and response time of asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects versus seronegative control subjects were compared by means of Mann-Whitney U-tests, both in the 3,000-ms and the 9,000-ms retention interval paradigms. Furthermore, in the group of asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects, the same measures (number of errors and response time) were compared with respect to stage of infection (A1 vs. A2), presence of a past history of intravenous drug abuse (subjects with such a history vs. subjects without), and presence of antiretroviral medications (subjects on vs. not on antiretroviral medications) by using Mann-Whitney U-tests, both in the 3,000-ms and the 9,000-ms retention interval paradigms.
Subjects were divided according to the presence/absence of a past history of intravenous drug abuse and the presence/absence of antiretroviral medications. This was done because data in the literature indicate these factors as potentially confounding variables in the context of HIV-related neuropsychological studies.29
RESULTS
As shown in Table 2, no significant differences were found in number of errors or response time when HIV-infected subjects and seronegative control subjects were compared, either in the 3,000-ms or the 9,000-ms retention interval paradigm; moreover, among the HIV-infected subjects, no significant differences were found on the same measures when subjects belonging to different stages of the infection were compared.
The presence/absence of a past history of intravenous drug abuse (Table 3) and the presence/absence of antiretroviral medications did not influence the spatial WM performance of subjects, either in the 3,000-ms or the 9,000-ms retention interval paradigm.
Finally, no significant correlations were found between number of errors, response time and age, length of illness, and number of lymphocyte CD4.
DISCUSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the spatial component of WM in the context of HIV infection. Our findings do not show any spatial working memory impairment during the asymptomatic phase of HIV infection. These data suggest that although structural and functional frontosubcortical abnormalities may be found in HIV infection, they do not imply neuropsychological deficits relative to working memory during the early, asymptomatic stage of the illness.
Some authors of neuropsychological studies in the context of HIV infection have mentioned that there are potentially confounding variables, such as neurological or psychiatric disorders, head trauma, or drug abuse, that can eventually influence findings,29 and it is therefore recommended that these variables be controlled for when performing data analysis. In this study, some of these variables were exclusion criteria and therefore were not confounders; furthermore, our data show no significant differences between subjects who are at different stages of the infection, between subjects with and without a past history of drug abuse, or between subjects on antiretroviral therapy and subjects free of such medications.
References
1.
Wiley CA, Masliah E, Morey M, et al: Neocortical damage during HIV infection. Ann Neurol 1991; 29:651–657
2.
Wiley CA, Masliah E, Morey M, et al: Cortical dendritic pathology in human immunodeficiency virus encephalitis. Lab Invest 1992; 66:285–291
3.
Miller EN, Satz P, Visscher B: Computerized and conventional neuropsychological assessment of HIV-1 infected homosexual men. Neurology 1991; 41:1608–1616
4.
Martin EM, Sorensen DJ, Eldestein HE, et al: Decision-making speed in HIV-1 infection. AIDS 1992; 6:109–113
5.
Peavy G, Jacobs D, Salmon DP, et al: Verbal memory performance of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: evidence of subcortical dysfunction. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1994; 16:508–523
6.
Everall IP, Luthert PJ, Lantos PL: Neuronal loss in the frontal cortex in HIV infection. Lancet 1991; 337:1119–1121
7.
Masliah E, Achim CL, Ge N, et al: Spectrum of human immunodeficiency virus–associated neocortical damage. Ann Neurol 1992; 32:321–329
8.
Ketzler S, Weis S, Haug H, et al: Loss of neurons in the frontal cortex in AIDS brains. Acta Neuropathol 1990; 80:92–94
9.
Heindel WC, Jernigan TL, Archibald SL, et al: The relationship of quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging measures to neuropathologic indexes of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Neurol 1994; 51:1129–1135
10.
Aylward EH, Henderer JD, McArthur JC, et al: Reduced basal ganglia volume in HIV-1–associated dementia: results from quantitative neuroimaging. Neurology 1993; 43:2099–2104
11.
Hestad K, McArthur JC, Dal Pan GJ, et al: Regional brain atrophy in HIV-1 infection: association with specific neuropsychological test performance. Acta Neurol Scand 1993; 88:112–118
12.
Kieburtz K, Ketonen L, Cox C, et al: Cognitive performance and regional brain volume in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Arch Neurol 1996; 53:155–158
13.
Dal Pan GJ, McArthur JH, Aylward E, et al: Patterns of cerebral atrophy in HIV-1 infected individuals: results of a quantifiable MRI analysis. Neurology 1992; 42:2125–2130
14.
Pascal S, Resnick L, Barker WW, et al: Metabolic asymmetries in asymptomatic HIV-1 seropositive subjects: relationship to disease onset and MRI findings. J Nucl Med 1991; 32:1725–1729
15.
Woods SW, O'Malley SS, Martini BL, et al: SPECT regional cerebral blood flow and neuropsychological testing in non-demented HIV-positive drug abusers: preliminary results. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1991; 15:649–662
16.
Goldman-Rakic PS: Working memory and the mind. Sci Am 1992; 9:111–117
17.
Baddeley A: Working Memory. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1986
18.
Baddeley A: Working memory. Science 1992; 255:556–559
19.
Funahashi S, Chafee MV, Goldman-Rakic PS: Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task. Nature 1993; 365:753–756
20.
Jonides J, Smith EE: The architecture of working memory, in Cognitive Neuroscience, edited by Rugg MD. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1997, pp 243–276
21.
Stout JC, Salmon DP, Butters N, et al: Decline in working memory associated with HIV infection. Psychol Med 1995; 25:1221–1232
22.
Law WA, Martin A, Mapou RL, et al: Working memory in individuals with HIV infection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1994; 16:173–182
23.
Bartok JA, Martin EM, Pitrak DL: Working memory deficits in HIV-seropositive drug users. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997; 3:451–456
24.
Wilkie FL, Goodkin K, Eisdorfer C, et al: Mild cognitive impairment and risk of mortality in HIV-1 infection. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 10:125–132
25.
Boccellari AA, Dilley JW, Chambers DB, et al: Immune function and neuropsychological performance in HIV-1 infected homosexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1993; 6:592–601
26.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definitions for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992; 41:1–19
27.
Raczkowsky D, Kalat JW, Nebes R: Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia 1974; 12:43–47
28.
Jonides J, Smith EE, Koeppe RA, et al: Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature 1993; 363:623–625
29.
Stern RA, Perkins DO, Evans DL: Neuropsychiatric manifestations of HIV-1 infection and AIDS, in Psychopharmacology, the Fourth Generation of Progress, edited by Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ. New York, Raven, 1995, pp 1545–1558
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 1 August 1999
Published in print: August 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).