Neurobiology of Self-Regulation: Longitudinal Influence of FKBP5 and Intimate Partner Violence on Emotional and Cognitive Development in Childhood
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective:
Self-regulation includes the volitional and nonvolitional regulation of emotional, cognitive, and physiological responses to stimulation. It develops from infancy through individual characteristics and the environment, with the stress hormone system as a central player. Accordingly, the authors hypothesized that genes involved in regulating the stress system, such as FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5), interact with early-life stress exposure, such as exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV), to predict self-regulation indicators and associated outcomes, including behavioral and learning problems in school.
Methods:
Study participants were a longitudinal birth cohort of 910 children for whom FKBP5 genotypes were available and who were assessed for exposure to IPV during the first 2 years of life as well as multiple measures of self-regulation: stress-induced cortisol reactivity and fear-elicited emotional reactivity at 7, 15, and 24 months, executive function at 36, 48, and 60 months, and emotional and behavioral difficulties and reading and math achievement in school grades 1, 2, and 5. Data were analyzed using longitudinal clustering and ordinal logistic regression procedures followed by mixed linear modeling.
Results:
Children with two copies of a risk FKBP5 haplotype and IPV exposure were significantly more likely to have a developmental trajectory characterized by high, prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and emotional reactivity in toddlerhood, followed by low executive function at school entry and high emotional and behavior problems and low reading ability in the primary school grades.
Conclusions:
The interaction of FKBP5 and IPV affects the physiological response to stress early in life, with consequences for emotional and cognitive self-regulation. Targeting self-regulation may present an early intervention strategy for children facing genetic and environmental risk.
Exposure to early-life stress robustly predicts a wide range of negative outcomes throughout the lifespan (1–3). Intimate partner violence (IPV)—a pattern of behavior in which one intimate partner threatens, intimidates, isolates, coerces, or uses emotional, sexual, or economic abuse to control the other partner—is a prevalent form of early-life stress (1). There is, however, marked variability in outcomes following early-life stress, raising questions about individual differences in genetic vulnerability to such adverse environments. Identifying factors contributing to negative outcomes following early-life stress is of great clinical importance and may inform interventions to enhance resilience.
Several genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in the stress response, mainly in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, are thought to moderate the impact of adversity on negative outcomes (4). Among the genes more consistently found to moderate the relationship between early adversity and negative outcomes is FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5). FKBP5 plays an important role in the HPA axis through regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor complex. FKBP5 provides an ultra-short feedback of glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity by being transcriptionally activated by the glucocorticoid receptor and subsequently limiting receptor activity via protein-protein interactions, with systemic consequences for the HPA axis’s set point (for a review, see reference 5). This molecular feedback regulation is moderated by common genetic variations. Four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs9296158, rs3800373, rs1360780, and rs9470080) within a functional haplotype in the FKBP5 locus have received the most attention. Molecular studies have shown that the CATT haplotype leads to an enhanced induction of FKBP5 expression with exposure to glucocorticoids by altering the three-dimensional structure of the locus (6–10). Increased FKBP5 mRNA expression in postmortem brains of patients with psychiatric disorders and animal studies using transgenic, viral, and pharmacological tools support the hypothesis that increased expression of FKBP5, especially in the hippocampus and the amygdala, leads to increased anxiety and decreased stress coping (for a review, see reference 5). This may suggest that increased FKBP5 expression driven by genetic and environmental factors could contribute to psychiatric disorders. Indeed, this high-expression haplotype, when combined with exposure to early adversity, predicts a host of psychiatric symptoms and traits, including depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychosis, and suicide attempts, as well as impaired learning and memory in adulthood (5). Given these broad observed associations, one could hypothesize that these diverse outcomes in adulthood may be driven by similar mechanisms early in life, with a common risk trajectory in childhood, followed by divergent symptom presentations later in life. In support of this notion, effects of the interaction of FKBP5 and early-life stress on known early risk factors for the development of psychiatric symptoms have been documented in children, ranging from greater stress-induced cortisol reactivity in infancy to heightened risk for anxiety, depression, substance use, and dissociation during adolescence (for a review, see reference 5).
Expanding on previous findings, in this study we investigated interrelated aspects of self-regulation as a potential common pathway through which the interaction of early-life stress and FKBP5 genotype increases risk for diverse negative outcomes, including psychopathology and poor academic achievement, in a longitudinal data set. We define self-regulation as a bidirectional system composed of cognitive, emotional, and physiological components that are hierarchically organized and reciprocally integrated. In its mature form, self-regulation is characterized by reflective, “top-down” control of behavior, in which executive function and the volitional control of attention can regulate emotional and physiological arousal in ways that promote engagement in goal-directed actions. Self-regulation, however, is also characterized by reactive, “bottom-up” control of behavior, in which levels of physiological arousal associated with the stress response and emotional reactivity can support or undercut the brain’s capacity for volitional top-down control (11). Mechanistically, these associations are driven by hormones (glucocorticoids and monoamines) that, at moderate levels, increase neural activity in the prefrontal cortex but at high levels shut down activity in the prefrontal cortex and increase activity in the amygdala. Thus, the effective regulation of emotion and the physiological response to stress during infancy and toddlerhood sets the stage for the development of higher-order self-regulation abilities, such as executive function (12, 13). Early emotion regulation and executive function abilities have been associated with a broad range of outcomes later in life, including mental health outcomes, school readiness, and academic achievement (12).
From infancy onward, self-regulation develops through the interplay between individual characteristics and environment via the stress hormone system, with consequences for brain development (13). Animal models have demonstrated that increased corticosteroid levels in response to early-life stress alter gene expression and induce structural and connectivity changes in brain areas involved in the regulation of stress response physiology (14–17), which modulates the neuroendocrine systems that underlie behavioral responses to stress. Variation in neural connectivity influences interindividual variation in stress physiology (17). Through this interplay, early-life stress can have wide-ranging effects on aspects of social-emotional and cognitive development as the self-regulation system adapts to conditions of high threat and vigilance.
Building on this empirical and theoretical basis, we hypothesized that the combined effects of early-life stress and FKBP5 are expected to influence stress-induced cortisol reactivity and phenotypes associated with impaired self-regulation. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the interaction between IPV exposure over the child’s first 2 years and functional FKBP5 haplotypes in shaping self-regulation abilities across developmental stages. The self-regulation abilities examined in this study were prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and fear-elicited emotional reactivity in infancy and toddlerhood, executive function in early childhood, and emotional and behavioral difficulties and reading and math abilities across the primary school grades (see Figure S1 in the online supplement for a schematic diagram).
Methods
Participants
The analytic sample comprised 910 children (461 were girls [50.7%]; 518 were African American [56.9%], and 392 were white [43.1%]) with genetic data from the Family Life Project, a longitudinal birth cohort of families living in predominantly low-income and rural communities in the United States (18). (For a detailed description of the sample, sampling procedure, and data collection, see the online supplement and reference 18.)
Measures
Exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV).
The child’s primary caregiver (in almost all instances [95%] the child’s biological mother) reported on IPV using the Conflict Tactics Scale (19) at child ages 7, 15, and 24 months. An aggregate of the respondent’s own and the respondent’s partner’s physical and psychological aggression was used to create a quantitative index of violence exposure (range, 0–4) during the child’s first 2 years.
Fear-elicited emotional reactivity.
At 7, 15, and 24 months, children underwent a mask presentation procedure to induce fear (20, 21). The experimenter wore four different masks, one at a time, while moving slowly from side to side in front of the child, saying the child’s name using a neutral tone of voice. At 7 months, children also underwent a barrier procedure and arm restraint procedure, and at 15 and 24 months, children underwent a toy removal procedure to induce frustration. We focus on the mask procedure given that it has been associated with the fear response and activity in the corticolimbic neural circuitry (22) that are central to our theoretical model. (See the online supplement for details on coding psychometric properties and Figure S2 in the online supplement for cortisol levels prior to and following the stress paradigm at each time point, broken down by CATT haplotype and IPV exposure.)
Prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity.
Stress-induced changes in cortisol were measured at 7, 15, and 24 months. To assess stress-induced changes in cortisol, saliva samples were collected before the mask presentation and at 20 and 40 minutes after peak arousal to the procedure and later assayed for cortisol. (For further details, see the online supplement .)
Intellectual ability.
Maternal depressive symptoms.
Self-reported maternal depressive symptoms at child age 24 months were assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (25).
Executive function.
At 36, 48, and 60 months, children underwent an executive function assessment battery that included three inhibitory control tasks (spatial conflict arrows, silly sounds Stroop, animal go/no-go), two working memory tasks (working memory span, pick the picture), and one attention-shifting task (“something’s the same”) (26). (For a detailed description of the tasks and the administration procedures, see the online supplement and reference 26.)
Emotional and behavioral problems.
The child’s lead teacher at school in grades 1, 2, and 5 completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (27) to assess conduct problems, hyperactivity, emotional problems, and peer problems. The sum of the subscale scores was used to measure emotional and behavioral problems over time.
Reading and math ability.
In grades 1, 2, and 5, the letter-word identification and applied problems subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement (28) were administered to assess reading and math ability. W scores, appropriate for longitudinal analysis of change, were used in all analyses.
Genotypes.
DNA was extracted from both the child and the biological mother, and genotyping of rs9296158, rs3800373, rs1360780, and rs9470080 was conducted with the appropriate probes for a Taqman SNP Genotyping Assay using an allelic discrimination assay protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). In addition, genetic ancestry markers were assessed. (See the online supplement for genotyping and quality control procedures and genetic ancestry marker analyses.) These four FKBP5 SNPs were combined to determine the copy numbers of the rarer CATT haplotype carried by each individual, using PLINK (children: 432 noncarriers, 384 carriers of one CATT haplotype allele, and 94 carriers of two CATT haplotype alleles; mothers: 414 noncarriers, 365 carriers of one CATT haplotype allele, and 86 carriers of two CATT haplotype alleles). Haploview was used to determine the linkage disequilibrium structure of the FKBP5 SNPs (see Figure S3 in the online supplement ).
Covariates.
Covariates included child sex, child state of residence, cumulative risk, household chaos, and genetic ancestry markers. Cumulative risk is a continuous score based on family income-to-needs ratio, constancy of spouse/partner living in the home, maternal education, hours of employment, household density, occupational prestige, and neighborhood noise/safety, measured at child age 7, 15, and 24 months (18). Household chaos is rated as a continuous score based on the number of times the child moved to a new residence, changes in primary and secondary caregivers, and changes in the people within the household, at 7, 15, and 24 months. These scores are based on previous work with the Family Life Project (18). To control for population stratification, the first six principal components derived from the ancestry-specific genotypes (see the online supplement ) were included in all analyses.
Statistical Analysis
Genotype differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were examined with chi-square and regression models. To examine prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity, we regressed cortisol levels from the earlier time points (cortisol levels at baseline and 20 minutes after the stress paradigm) and the covariates onto the cortisol levels measured 40 minutes after the stressor at each assessment (at 7, 15, and 24 months). The residuals from these models were used in our longitudinal cluster analyses. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data (see the online supplement for imputation procedures and Table S1 in the online supplement for available data by outcome).
Analyses followed an additive genetic model in which individuals with increasing numbers of risk haplotypes (noncarrier=0, one CATT haplotype allele=1, and two CATT haplotype alleles=2) were compared and exposure to IPV was examined as a continuous measure. K-means-based longitudinal clustering was conducted to identify groups of participants with similar phenotype presentation across time. Two separate cluster analyses were conducted to account for the developmental stage at the time of measurement. The first cluster analysis included prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and fear-elicited emotional reactivity measured at 7, 15, and 24 months. The second cluster analysis included reading and math ability and teacher-reported emotional and behavioral difficulties in grades 1, 2, and 5. The best clustering solution was determined using the Caliński and Harabasz criterion (CH index) (29). To assess the developmental progression of children from the early development clusters to the school-age clusters, Cohen’s kappa test (30) was conducted to infer the correspondence between two clustering results (see the online supplement for details on the cluster analyses procedures).
The outcomes of the early development and school-age cluster analyses were ranked by phenotype severity. Ordinal logistic regression (31) with a proportional odds regression was used to examine the main effect model (G or E), the additive model (G+E), and the multiplicative interactive model (G×E) of the CATT haplotype and IPV exposure on the ranked phenotypes. To determine model fit, likelihood ratio tests were used to compare each model to the reduced model. To complement these analyses, mixed linear growth models were conducted in R to illustrate the findings of the longitudinal cluster analyses for each outcome (see the online supplement ).
We carried out several sensitivity analyses to exclude alternative explanations and determine the specificity of the effects (see the online supplement and Figure S4.)
Results
No significant differences were observed in demographic or clinical characteristics between child genotypes (see Table S2 in the online supplement ). For child outcomes, the correlation was lower among variables earlier in development compared with outcomes in early and middle childhood (see Figure S5 in the online supplement ). However, the correlation between outcomes gradually increased across variables from 24 months onward, suggesting that convergences of developmental trajectories over the first 24 months are relevant for the prediction of later outcome.
Longitudinal Cluster Analyses
Longitudinal cluster analyses were used to identify individuals with similar prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and emotion regulation over the first 2 years of life and behavioral and academic trajectories from grade 1 to grade 5. For both the early development and school-age cluster analyses, a two-cluster solution had the highest CH index (see Figure S6 in the online supplement ). During early development, a cluster with low emotional reactivity and faster normalization of cortisol (cluster “low emotional reactivity/cortisol”; 51.1% of participants; see Figure S7 in the online supplement ) separated from a cluster of children with higher emotional reactivity and prolonged normalization of cortisol (cluster “high emotional reactivity/cortisol”; 48.9% of participants). In the school-age children, a cluster with fewer emotional and behavioral problems and higher academic ability (cluster “low behavioral problems/high academic achievement”; 63.4% of participants) contrasted with a cluster with more behavioral problems and lower academic ability (cluster “high behavioral problems/low academic achievement”; 36.6% of participants). The clusters across the two developmental stages were in “slight agreement” (Cohen’s kappa=0.032, 95% CI=−0.034, 0.097, p=0.17).
The combined developmental clusters were ranked by severity of difficulties across time. Figure 1 illustrates all the outcomes according to the four cluster groups. Children within the clusters of high emotional reactivity/cortisol in toddlerhood and high behavioral problems/low academic achievement later on had the most difficulties across time (high stress sensitivity toddler/high risk school-age, N=170). They were followed by children who presented with high levels of difficulties in the school-age analyses but not increased emotional reactivity during early development (low stress sensitivity toddler/high risk school-age, N=163). A third group of children presented with increased emotional reactivity difficulties during early childhood but no difficulties in middle childhood (high stress sensitivity toddler/low risk school-age, N=275). Children in the last group presented with both low emotional reactivity during early childhood and low emotion and behavioral difficulties and high reading ability in middle childhood (low stress sensitivity toddler/low risk school-age, N=302).
FIGURE 1. Trajectories across time for each outcome for four cluster groups of children in a study of FKBP5 genotype and early-life exposure to intimate partner violencea
a Prolonged stress-induced cortisol and emotional reactivity were measured at 7, 15, and 24 months; executive function was measured at 36, 48, and 60 months; and emotional and behavioral difficulties and reading and math ability were measured in school grades 1, 2, and 5.
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis
Ordinal logistic regression revealed that executive function over the course of development, which was not used to define the cluster groups and was measured at time points between the early and school-age trajectories (at 36, 48, and 60 months), was significantly associated with the cluster groups (β=0.246, SE=0.034, p<0.001) (Figure 1C). Children with elevated levels of prolonged stress-induced cortisol and emotional reactivity in toddlerhood also had the lowest executive function at all three time points.
Next, we examined how the IPV exposure and FKBP5 haplotype interaction was associated with the developmental trajectory a child belonged to. A model including the interaction of CATT haplotype by IPV exposure showed a stronger association with the cluster groups than both the null model (p=0.005) and the additive model (p=0.037; see Table 1 for model comparisons), providing evidence that the CATT haplotype-by-IPV interaction is associated with the clustering orders (Figure 2). Children belonging to the high stress sensitivity toddler/high risk school-age cluster had the highest IPV exposure and the highest proportion of carriers of two copies of the CATT risk haplotype. Specifically, 29.7% of participants carrying two copies of the CATT haplotype and with above-average levels of IPV exposure (mean IPV exposure for the sample, >0.847) belonged to the high stress sensitivity toddler/high risk school-age cluster, compared with 14.2% of participants carrying two copies of the CATT haplotype with lower levels of IPV exposure. The odds ratio of carrying two copies of the CATT haplotype and having high IPV exposure and being in the group of children with an at-risk developmental trajectory (high stress sensitivity toddler/high risk school-age cluster) was 4.15 (p=0.031, 95% CI=0.99, 21.12) in comparison to being in the group of children with a low-risk developmental trajectory (low stress sensitivity toddler/low risk school-age cluster).
| Model | Log Odds | SE | t | Comparison With Null Model (p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Main effect of child CATT haplotype | –0.170 | 0.090 | –1.900 | 0.062 |
| Model 2: Main effect of IPV | –0.220 | 0.096 | –2.300 | 0.021 |
| Model 3: Additive effect | ||||
| CATT haplotype | –0.170 | 0.090 | –1.800 | 0.013 |
| IPV | –0.220 | 0.096 | –2.300 | |
| Model 4: Multiplicative interaction effect | ||||
| Child CATT haplotype | 0.084 | 0.150 | 0.560 | 0.005 |
| IPV | 0.260 | 0.250 | 1.000 | |
| Child CATT haplotype by IPV | –0.280 | 0.140 | –2.100 |
a
Each model has been adjusted for child sex, child state of residence, cumulative risk, household chaos, and ancestry markers.
FIGURE 2. Representation of the interaction between exposure to intimate partner violence and CATT haplotype predicting the ranking of the cluster groups based on phenotype severitya
a CATT haplotype: noncarrier=0, one CATT haplotype allele=1, and two CATT haplotype alleles=2. Carriers of two copies of the FKBP5 haplotype with high exposure to intimate partner violence were more likely to be in the high stress sensitivity toddler/high risk primary school cluster group, at risk for deficits in executive function, emotional and behavioral problems, and poor academic achievement, compared with the low stress sensitivity toddler/low risk primary school cluster group (odds ratio=4.15, p=0.031, 95% CI=0.99, 21.12).
Mixed Linear Models
Mixed-model analyses were used to more explicitly visualize the findings from the longitudinal cluster analyses. The CATT haplotype-by-IPV interaction significantly predicted prolonged stress-induced cortisol and emotional reactivity at 15 and 24 months (p=0.035 and p=0.038, respectively), executive function at 60 months (p=0.029), and emotional and behavioral problems (p=0.020) and reading ability (p=0.035) in school grades 1, 2, and 5 (Cohen’s d values ranging from 0.13 for prolonged stress-induced cortisol at 15 months to 0.77 for emotional and behavioral problems in grade 5, for the significant findings). These analyses are illustrated in Figure 3 and detailed further in the online supplement .
FIGURE 3. Trajectory of prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity, emotional reactivity, executive function, emotional and behavioral difficulties, and reading and math ability at average exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) and exposure to IPV during the child’s first 2 yearsa
a The panels depict one standard error above and below the mean IPV exposure rating, broken down by number of CATT haplotype copies (noncarrier=0, one CATT haplotype allele=1, and two CATT haplotype alleles=2) across time. The estimated means of each outcome have been adjusted for child sex, child race, child’s state of residence, household chaos, and cumulative risk (i.e., continuous score based on family income-to-needs ratio, constancy of spouse/partner living in the home, maternal education, hours of employment, household density, occupational prestige, and neighborhood noise/safety, measured at child age 7, 15, and 24 months). Additionally, prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity scores were adjusted for time of day the cortisol measures were taken, acetaminophen intake, and cortisol levels at baseline and 20 minutes after the stress paradigm. Mixed linear models revealed that the interaction significantly predicted prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity at 15 and 24 months (β=0.10, SE=0.05, p=0.035, Cohen’s d=0.13, and β=0.09, SE=0.04, p=0.038, d=0.20, respectively), fear-elicited emotional reactivity at 24 months (β=0.06, SE=0.03, p=0.026, d=0.26), executive function at 60 months (β=−0.079, SE=0.036, p=0.029, d=0.29), emotional and behavioral problems trajectory (β=0.048, SE=0.021, p=0.020, d=0.77), and reading ability trajectory (β=−4.199, SE=1.988, p=0.035, d=0.39).
Sensitivity Analyses
The IPV and CATT haplotype interaction remained a significant predictor of reading and math ability after adjusting for general intelligence. The interaction also remained a significant predictor of cluster group assignment when controlling for maternal depressive symptoms. Maternal CATT haplotype, independently or in combination with IPV, was not associated with cluster group assignment. The interaction between cumulative risk and CATT haplotype did not significantly predict any of the self-regulation or school-age outcomes (p values >0.050). The three-way interaction between IPV, CATT haplotype, and ethnicity did not significantly predict cluster groups (p=0.250). Lastly, the CATT haplotype-by-IPV interaction did not predict any measure of general intelligence, providing support for the interaction effect being specific to self-regulation outcomes.
Discussion
As predicted by the model of self-regulation, exposure to high levels of IPV before age 2 among FKBP5 risk haplotype carriers was associated with higher levels of physiological and emotional reactivity, with consequences for emotional and cognitive development through middle childhood.
The findings are consistent with the mounting research on the dynamic relationship between the stress hormone system and self-regulation and how their interaction affects an individual’s functioning over time (32). The associations were confined to self-regulation outcomes and were not observed for intellectual ability. Previous molecular and endocrine findings show that an enhanced up-regulation of FKBP5 during the acute stress phase (which has been associated with the CATT haplotype) leads to impaired negative feedback of the stress hormone system and prolonged cortisol responses by reducing glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity and thus negative feedback mechanisms (see reference 5 for a review). Therefore, an altered endocrine response to stress in the presence of a chronic stressor, such as IPV, would be expected to influence behavioral outcomes. In accordance, the collective findings of this study indicate that children carrying the CATT haplotype who are exposed to IPV during the first 2 years of life are significantly more likely to display early prolonged cortisol responses in parallel with differences in emotion regulation, followed by later cognitive and behavioral differences. This may suggest that early variation in emotion and stress hormone response regulation determined by environmental and genetic risk may drive aspects of behavioral adaptation over the course of development.
The observed behavioral differences in this study may be the result of increased FKBP5 expression in the developing brain. In experimental animals, higher FKBP5 expression in specific brain regions has been associated with increased anxiety-related behavior as well as reduced stress coping (see reference 33 for a review). Human neuroimaging studies have shown an association between the high FKBP5 expression CATT haplotype and changes in the volume and connectivity of the hippocampus, frontal cortex, and amygdala (34). Furthermore, a recent postmortem study (33) revealed decreased synaptic spine density in the medial orbitofrontal cortex associated with increased FKBP5 expression (which would be predicted in CATT carriers with early-life stress exposure [35]), suggesting that high FKBP5 expression may be associated with the biological systems necessary for learning and memory. In fact, increases in FKBP5 not only would affect glucocorticoid receptor regulation but also would alter a number of downstream pathways that FKBP5 influences via protein/protein interaction (36). These include systems associated with neuronal function and synaptic plasticity and could thus have a direct impact on these brain circuits. Studies are needed to examine the effects of FKBP5-by-early-life stress, such as IPV exposure, on emotional circuit activation throughout development.
This study adds to the growing literature indicating that FKBP5 and early-life stress interact in shaping outcomes across multiple domains of functioning (5). In this study, the clusters at each developmental stage were in “slight agreement” according to the Cohen’s kappa value. This relatively low correlation between child outcomes and the clusters likely reflects processes of equifinality (multiple pathways ending with the same outcome) and multifinality (children with similar risks ending with different outcomes) (37, 38), as is commonly presented in the literature (37). Moreover, our analyses were confined to exposure to IPV before age 2 and we did not adjust for environmental influences after that period. Notably, despite not having controlled for environmental influences past age 2, we still found that children characterized by the combination of the FKBP5 risk haplotype and IPV exposure before age 2 were overrepresented in the high-risk outcome trajectories across all age periods.
This study has a number of strengths (e.g., a multi-informant approach, biological measures, and longitudinal assessment), but also several limitations. First, participants with missing IPV data were more likely to be African American and to be characterized by higher cumulative risk. In an effort to overcome this limitation, we employed state-of-the-art procedures to address missing data (see the online supplement ). Second, the diverse ethnic background of the cohort may confound the G×E analysis. To avoid false positive results confounded by population stratification, we used ancestry-informative genetic markers as covariates in all analyses and tested for the three-way interaction of IPV with FKBP5 and race/ethnicity. We found no evidence that ethnicity confounds the observed G×E interaction. Similarly, our sample was composed predominantly of children of low socioeconomic status. Poverty is a well-studied early-life stress associated with poor physical and mental health. Notably, our measure of cumulative risk, which incorporated socioeconomic status, did not significantly predict prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and emotional reactivity in this study, whereas exposure to IPV did. Hence, in order to investigate how factors that influence prolonged stress-induced cortisol reactivity and emotional reactivity in early childhood affect later outcomes, we believe that IPV is the best suited exposure in this cohort. Third, it was beyond the scope of the study to disentangle whether the increased risk for emotional and behavioral symptoms and poor academic achievement observed were due to other stressors, such as prenatal stress due to IPV exposure during gestation. The association of other types of early adversity with HPA reactivity and longitudinal child outcomes remain an important future research venture. Fourth, this study focused on the influence of the G×E interaction on self-regulation from infancy to middle childhood. A recent cross-sectional study suggested that FKBP5 may interact with early-life stress to predict self-regulation outcomes, namely, rumination and catastrophizing, during adolescence (39). Further longitudinal data are required to determine whether this interaction influences adult self-regulation outcomes.
In conclusion, and consistent with the hypothesized model of self-regulation, functional FKBP5 haplotypes interacted with IPV exposure, resulting in long-term and likely interconnected effects on endocrine, emotional, behavioral, and cognitive functioning throughout development into middle childhood. These findings provide valuable insight into potential early shared mechanisms underlying the diverse mental health and cognitive outcomes associated with early adversity-by-FKBP5 interactions and could have important implications for identifying at-risk children and intervention targets.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the many families and research assistants who made this study possible.
Acknowledgments
The Family Life Project key investigators include Lynne Vernon-Feagans, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Mark T. Greenberg, Pennsylvania State University; Clancy B. Blair, New York University; Margaret R. Burchinal, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Martha Cox, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Patricia T. Garrett-Peters, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Jennifer L. Frank, Pennsylvania State University; W. Roger Mills-Koonce, University of North Carolina–Greensboro; and Michael T. Willoughby, RTI International.
Supplementary Material
File (appi.ajp.2019.18091018.ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 1.89 MB
References
1.
Vu NL, Jouriles EN, McDonald R, et al: Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems. Clin Psychol Rev 2016; 46:25–33
2.
Koenen KC, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, et al: Domestic violence is associated with environmental suppression of IQ in young children. Dev Psychopathol 2003; 15:297–311
3.
Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, et al: Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197:378–385
4.
Halldorsdottir T, Binder EB: Gene × environment interactions: from molecular mechanisms to behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 2017; 68:215–241
5.
Matosin N, Halldorsdottir T, Binder EB: Understanding the molecular mechanisms underpinning gene by environment interactions in psychiatric disorders: the FKBP5 model. Biol Psychiatry 2018; 83:821–830
6.
Luijk MP, Velders FP, Tharner A, et al: FKBP5 and resistant attachment predict cortisol reactivity in infants: gene-environment interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2010; 35:1454–1461
7.
Buchmann AF, Holz N, Boecker R, et al: Moderating role of FKBP5 genotype in the impact of childhood adversity on cortisol stress response during adulthood. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 24:837–845
8.
Ising M, Depping AM, Siebertz A, et al: Polymorphisms in the FKBP5 gene region modulate recovery from psychosocial stress in healthy controls. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 28:389–398
9.
Binder EB, Bradley RG, Liu W, et al: Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. JAMA 2008; 299:1291–1305
10.
Touma C, Gassen NC, Herrmann L, et al: FK506 binding protein 5 shapes stress responsiveness: modulation of neuroendocrine reactivity and coping behavior. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70:928–936
11.
Arnsten AFT: Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:410–422
12.
Blair C, Raver CC: School readiness and self-regulation: a developmental psychobiological approach. Annu Rev Psychol 2015; 66:711–731
13.
Blair C, Raver CC: Child development in the context of adversity: experiential canalization of brain and behavior. Am Psychol 2012; 67:309–318
14.
Teicher MH, Samson JA: Annual research review: Enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016; 57:241–266
15.
Teicher MH, Samson JA: Childhood maltreatment and psychopathology: a case for ecophenotypic variants as clinically and neurobiologically distinct subtypes. Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170:1114–1133
16.
Teicher MH, Samson JA, Anderson CM, et al: The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function, and connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17:652–666
17.
Russo SJ, Murrough JW, Han MH, et al: Neurobiology of resilience. Nat Neurosci 2012; 15:1475–1484
18.
Vernon-Feagans L, Cox M; FLF Key Investigators: The Family Life Project: an epidemiological and developmental study of young children living in poor rural communities. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 2013; 78:1–150
19.
Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, et al: The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996; 17:283–316
20.
Ursache A, Blair C, Stifter C, et al: Emotional reactivity and regulation in infancy interact to predict executive functioning in early childhood. Dev Psychol 2013; 49:127–137
21.
Goldsmith H, Rothbart MK: Prelocomotor and Locomotor Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab-TAB, version 3.0) (Technical Manual). Madison, University of Wisconsin, Department of Psychology, 1996
22.
LeDoux J: Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 2012; 73:653–676
23.
Bayley N: Bayley Scales of Infant Development: Manual. San Antonio, Tex, Psychological Corp, 1993
24.
Wechsler D: WPPSI-III Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, Tex, Psychological Corp, 2002
25.
Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1:385–401
26.
Willoughby MT, Blair CB, Wirth RJ, et al: The measurement of executive function at age 5: psychometric properties and relationship to academic achievement. Psychol Assess 2012; 24:226–239
27.
Goodman R: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997; 38:581–586
28.
Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N: Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, Ill, Riverside Publishing, 2001
29.
Caliński T, Harabasz J: A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat Theory Methods 1974; 3:1–27
30.
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–174
31.
Agresti A: Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2002
32.
Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, et al: Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour, and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:434–445
33.
Young KA, Thompson PM, Cruz DA, et al: BA11 FKBP5 expression levels correlate with dendritic spine density in postmortem PTSD and controls. Neurobiol Stress 2015; 2:67–72
34.
Tozzi L, Carballedo A, Wetterling F, et al: Single-nucleotide polymorphism of the FKBP5 gene and childhood maltreatment as predictors of structural changes in brain areas involved in emotional processing in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2016; 41:487–497
35.
Klengel T, Mehta D, Anacker C, et al: Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene-childhood trauma interactions. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16:33–41
36.
Rein T: FK506 binding protein 51 integrates pathways of adaptation: FKBP51 shapes the reactivity to environmental change. BioEssays 2016; 38:894–902
37.
Cicchetti D: Annual research review: Resilient functioning in maltreated children: past, present, and future perspectives. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:402–422
38.
Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA: Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol 1996; 8:597–600
39.
Halldorsdottir T, de Matos APS, Awaloff Y, et al: FKBP5 moderation of the relationship between childhood trauma and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in adolescents. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017; 84:61–65
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 3 September 2018
Revision received: 19 December 2018
Accepted: 4 February 2019
Published online: 5 April 2019
Published in print: August 01, 2019
Keywords
Authors
Author Contributions
Drs. Binder and Blair contributed equally to this study.
Competing Interests
Dr. Halldorsdottir receives funding from European Research Council Consolidator Grant 726413. Dr. Müller-Myhsok is a consultant to HMNC Brain Health and is a member of the advisory board of RowAnalytics. Dr. Binder is a co-inventor on a patent on FKBP5, a novel target for antidepressant therapy (European patent 1687443 B1), and receives research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim for a collaboration on functional investigations of FKBP5. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
Supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grants R01 HD51502 and P01 HD39667), with co‐funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institutes of Health Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (program grant UG3OD023332). Dr. Halldorsdottir was funded in part by a European Research Council Consolidator Grant (StressGene, grant 726413 to Dr. Unnur A. Valdimarsdóttir).
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).