Ictal Asomatognosia With Illusory Limb Movement Secondary to Dominant Parietal Lobe Lesion

A right-handed 74-year-old woman with a past medical history of hypertension presented to a tertiary hospital in Singapore, with complaints of episodic, intermittent right upper and lower limb “funny” sensations that she had for 3 days. Each episode typically lasted <5 minutes. The patient described the sensation of an inability to take control of her own limbs, stating that each limb “has [its] own mind.” She also reported sensations of limb movement during those episodes, with no observed physical movement. Neurologic examination results showed no definite motor or sensory deficits. A brain MRI scan showed a left parietal lobe lesion that was likely attributable to a previous hemorrhage (Figure 1). A 30-minute scalp EEG recording showed a total of four episodes of EEG seizures that arose from the left parietal region (20–25 Hz, maximum P3 and Pz) and lasted 40–70 seconds. The patient claimed that she felt “funny” and had twitches over her left arm and shoulder during one of the episodes (Figure 2). No movement was observed throughout the recording. The patient was prescribed levetiracetam, and the episodes completely resolved in a few days.

Asomatognosia is more commonly described in patients with a lesion in the nondominant hemisphere. A wide range of severity has been described in the literature. For some patients, severity has been associated with a confabulatory nature toward their own limbs. Apart from denying ownership, some patients could even allocate a separate identity to their own limbs.¹ Feinberg et al.² described patients with confabulatory limb movement as having illusory limb movement. Among these, almost all are secondary to nondominant lobe lesions.

Geschwind⁵ proposed a disconnection model between the perceptual right and verbal left hemispheres as a cause of confabulatory asomatognosia observed in right hemisphere lesions. Gazzaniga^6,7 also suggests that the left hemisphere serves an interpreter function, which constructs and interprets relationships between perceived events, actions, and feelings. On the basis of the above-mentioned studies, the left brain could potentially confabulate when there is an information gap between actions and perceptions.

Lu et al.⁸ showed that although illusory limb movement can be observed during left hemiparesis induced by right intracarotid barbiturate infusion, a clear link between anosognosia and phantom perception could not be demonstrated. Lu et al.⁸ suggested that anosognosia and phantom movement are dissociable. In our case, both confabulation and anosognosia occurred in the absence of hemiparesis; these combinations suggest that all three factors are likely not causative factors for each other, but they are possibly a product of miscommunication between the multiple regions across cerebral hemispheres. This is in line with a previous article by Venneri and Shanks,⁹ who proposed that deficits in multisensory integration and spatial representation of the body produce such observations.

Asomatognosia involving a dominant lobe has been uncommon to date. Nishibayashi et al.¹⁰ described a case of dominant lobe ictal asomatognosia with EEG correlates. Our case provides further evidence of ictal asomatognosia with EEG correlates, coupled with confabulatory illusory limb movement. Both cases highlight and support the hypothesis of a potential role of the dominant parietal lobe as the center of interpretation. A hyperfunctioning dominant parietal lobe as a result of a seizure could have created a mismatch between actions and senses, thus producing such semiology.

In conclusion, our case supports the previous disconnection model and reaffirms the possible role of the dominant parietal lobe in interpreting and integrating information on the limb’s senses and actions.