Skip to main content
Full access
Letter to the Editor
Published Online: 1 November 2001

Dr. Gabbard Replies

To the Editor: I thank Dr. Gossart and Dr. Lembke for their comments on my recent editorial. Dr. Gossart and I agree that Cartesian dualism is no longer useful in psychiatric discourse. Nevertheless, the decline and fall of Cartesian thinking does not mean that we should dispense with the domains of “mind” and “brain” in our language. The brain is a third-person phenomenon that can be directly observed and is therefore perception based. The mind involves the complexities of subjectivity, meaning, and consciousness and is a first-person phenomenon that can never be directly observed since it is introspection based. In Descartes’s model, the mind was an entity distinct from the body. It merely intersected the body at the pineal gland. My frame of reference in my editorial was quite different. Indeed, my whole argument was that because mind is the activity of the brain, the two are inextricably tied to one another. Even more important, both domains are relevant to the practice of psychiatry. If we do not keep both in our awareness, we are vulnerable to the perils of reductionism.
Dr. Lembke brings up an issue that is near and dear to my heart: namely, that we fragment the psychological and biological in our residency training programs by teaching psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy separately. Few residencies teach a systematic approach to integrated treatment, even though the majority of patients in psychiatric practice receive both medication and psychotherapy. We implicitly collude with the mind-brain fragmentation by the way in which we train our residents. It is a sad irony that the biopsychosocial model that is perhaps best typified by the integration of medication and psychotherapy is a dying conceptual framework in psychiatry. The residents who learn the art of combining the two modalities either learn by the seat of their pants or are fortunate to have a mentor who has evolved a thoughtful way in which to use both treatments and has conveyed this method in the context of clinical supervision.
Psychiatrists in the future should be educated so that our unique position as integrators of the biological and the psychosocial is operationalized in everyday practice.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 1939-a - 1940

History

Published online: 1 November 2001
Published in print: November 2001

Authors

Affiliations

GLEN O. GABBARD, M.D.
Topeka, Kan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share