Skip to main content
Full access
New Research
Published Online: 1 January 2012

Risk of Death From Accidental Overdose Associated With Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION

Abstract

Objective:

Despite dramatic increases in the rate of fatal accidental overdose in recent years, risk factors for this outcome remain poorly understood, particularly in clinical populations. The authors examined the association of psychiatric and substance use diagnoses with death from accidental overdose.

Method:

The study followed a cohort of patients from 2000 to 2006. The cohort included all patients treated in Veterans Health Administration facilities during fiscal year 1999 who were alive at the start of fiscal year 2000 (N=3,291,891). Death by accidental overdose was determined using National Death Index records and defined as a death with underlying cause of death coded to ICD-10 codes X40–X45 (N=4,485). Diagnoses were determined by patient medical records.

Results:

Adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, hazard ratios of death by accidental overdose associated with prior psychiatric and substance use disorder diagnoses ranged from 1.8 to 8.8. Significant associations of non-substance-related psychiatric disorders with risk of death by accidental overdose persisted after additional adjustment for substance use disorders (hazard ratios from 1.2 to 1.8). Depressive disorders and anxiety disorders other than posttraumatic stress disorder had stronger associations with risk of medication-related overdose death (hazard ratios, 3.02 and 3.07, respectively) than with risk of overdose death related to alcohol or illegal drugs (hazard ratios, 1.89 and 1.23, respectively).

Conclusions:

Among patients receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration, death from accidental overdose was found to be associated with psychiatric and substance use disorders. The study findings suggest the importance of risk assessment and overdose prevention for vulnerable clinical subpopulations.
Death from accidental overdose—unintentional death resulting from poisoning by illegal drugs, alcohol, or medications—is the second most common cause of accidental death in the United States (1). The rate of fatal unintentional overdose or poisoning among adults over age 18 increased by 124% between 1999 and 2007 (1). This increase is attributed largely to prescription drug overdoses, and particularly to overdoses related to opioid pain medication (2, 3). Given the importance of health systems to the distribution of prescription drugs that carry overdose potential and the treatment of individuals at risk for overdose, it is crucial to identify at-risk groups in clinical populations for targeted interventions.
Little research has been conducted on risk factors for fatal accidental overdose, in clinical or other settings. Much of the available data come from surveillance systems (such as those implemented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]), which have limited data on the characteristics of individuals who died from overdose. Previous analyses of these data indicate that men are more likely to die by accidental overdose, and individuals ages 40 to 49 have the highest rates of accidental overdose (4). Analyses of overdose decedents in West Virginia suggest that substance abuse and mental illness may be common among those who die of an overdose (5, 6), although the lack of a comparison group did not allow the determination of whether the prevalences of these characteristics are significantly elevated.
More detailed information regarding risk for nonfatal overdose has come from survey-based studies of chronic users of illegal drugs. These studies typically have samples from treatment settings and are often limited to one geographical region. Analyses suggest that individuals who meet criteria for substance use disorders (710) and individuals experiencing psychological distress (10, 11) have an elevated risk of nonfatal accidental overdoses compared with individuals without these conditions.
Although understanding risk factors for accidental overdose among chronic drug users is important, questions regarding risk for accidental overdose in broader clinical populations remain unanswered. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk of accidental overdose associated with substance use disorders and other psychiatric disorders among the entire population of patients who used Veterans Health Administration services within a single year. We examined clinical and mortality data to assess possible associations between specific psychiatric diagnoses and patients' risks of accidental overdose death over a 7-year observation period. Because individuals with psychiatric conditions are more likely to have substance use disorders as well, we also examined the degree to which associations between psychiatric disorders and accidental overdose risk may be accounted for by comorbid substance use disorders. Additionally, we examined the association of psychiatric disorders with medication-related and alcohol- or illegal drug-related overdoses separately because of the different clinical implications for these two outcomes.

Method

Study Population

The study cohort included all patients who used Veterans Health Administration services in fiscal year 1999 (October 1, 1998–September 30, 1999) and were alive at the start of fiscal year 2000 (October 1, 1999). The sample, which comprised 3,291,891 individuals, has been described elsewhere (12). These individuals were followed until the end of fiscal year 2006 or death, whichever came first. The study was approved by the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Human Subjects Committee. Informed consent was waived by the Human Subjects Committee; all data were collected through the course of normal medical care and government mortality monitoring systems.

Data Sources

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Patient Care Database was used to identify all individuals who had Veterans Health Administration inpatient, residential, or outpatient encounters in fiscal year 1999. The National Patient Care Database includes demographic and diagnostic information for all treatment contacts of patients seen anywhere in the national Veterans Health Administration health system.
Information about vital status and cause of death from the start of fiscal year 2000 though the end of fiscal year 2006 were obtained from the CDC's National Death Index. The National Death Index compiles death record data for all U.S. residents from state vital statistics offices. Among all available population-level sources of mortality data, the National Death Index has the greatest sensitivity in determining vital status (13). National Death Index searches were conducted for all individuals who used Veterans Health Administration services in fiscal year 1999 and did not have any record of Veterans Health Administration service use in fiscal years 2007 or 2008; searches were not conducted for individuals who used Veterans Health Administration services in fiscal years 2007 or 2008 given that they were known to be alive after the end of the observation period. In instances where the National Death Index search yielded multiple records as potential matches, procedures described previously by Sohn and colleagues (14) were used to ascertain “true” matches.

Measures

Demographic characteristics.

The available data allowed for examination of age and gender. Age was divided into 10-year categories to allow comparability of findings with prior research on suicide in the Veterans Health Administration (12, 15) and national overdose trends (1). VA priority status, which has eight categories and is based on factors such as income, presence of disabilities related to military service and other disabilities, and service-related factors (e.g., service in specific conflicts), was used to partially adjust for socioeconomic status (see the description at www.va.gov/healtheligibility/eligibility/PriorityGroupsAll.asp). Reliable information on other demographic characteristics was not available from patient records.

Diagnostic characteristics.

All psychiatric diagnoses were based on ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes recorded during a visit in fiscal year 1998 or 1999. The psychiatric diagnoses examined were depression (major depressive disorder and non-major depressive disorder depression), schizophrenia (including schizoaffective disorder), bipolar I or II disorder, substance use disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other (non-PTSD) anxiety disorders. Diagnosis indicators were not mutually exclusive. Specific substance use disorders (opioid, stimulant [cocaine and amphetamines], cannabis, and other) were also included. Medical comorbidity was measured using the Charlson comorbidity score (16), a weighted index used to classify comorbid conditions that has been used to identify risk of mortality. A categorical variable was created for the Charlson score with the values of either 0 or 1, where 1 indicates ≥1 (17).

Outcome measures.

We obtained dates and causes of death from the National Death Index. Accidental overdose deaths were identified using ICD-10 underlying cause of death codes X40–X45, which include all poisoning deaths that were the result of ingestion of medications, alcohol, or illegal drugs. From National Death Index records, we additionally used ICD-10 T-codes, which describe the specific substance(s) that caused poisoning (as determined by the medical examiner) in order to create two additional outcome measures: 1) accidental overdose deaths due in part or in whole to prescription or over-the-counter medications (codes T360–T399, T402–T404, and T420–T509), henceforth called “medication-related overdoses,” and 2) accidental overdose deaths due in part or in whole to alcohol or to substances without widespread medical application in the United States (T400–T401, T405, and T407–T409), henceforth called “alcohol/illegal drug-related overdoses.”

Statistical Analysis

We estimated a series of Cox proportional hazards regression models (18) to yield unadjusted hazard ratios to estimate risk of accidental overdose death for each variable of interest and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each estimate. If the 95% CIs of hazard ratios associated with two different related tests do not overlap, then the hazard ratio associated with one condition is necessarily significantly larger than the other. The next series of proportional hazards regression models estimated the hazard ratio of accidental overdose for each diagnosis, individually adjusting for age group, gender, VA priority status, and Charlson comorbidity score (these covariates were used in all further analyses as well). Next, we created models for each of the non-substance use disorder diagnoses, individually adjusted for the same covariates as well as substance use disorder status. Additional analyses included models for each of the non-substance use disorder diagnoses, individually stratified by substance use disorder status; a set of models of the association of substance use disorder status with the outcome among just those individuals with each of the non-substance use disorder diagnoses; and models examining the association of each diagnosis with medication-related and alcohol/illegal drug-related accidental overdoses separately.
The denominator for all Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was person-years of risk time. For each individual in the cohort, time of observation began the first day of fiscal year 2000 and ended on the last day of fiscal year 2006 or at the date of death, whichever came first. All analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). For all models, covariance sandwich estimators (19) were used for all regression analyses to adjust for the clustered nature of the data, with patients nested within Veterans Health Administration facilities.

Results

Table 1 presents descriptive information for the study population. The patient population of the Veterans Health Administration in fiscal year 1999 was largely male (90.0%), and 75.4% were between ages 40 and 59. Substance use disorders and depressive disorders were the most common types of disorders in this population in fiscal year 1999 (10.0% and 14.5%, respectively).
TABLE 1. Demographic and Diagnostic Characteristics and Unadjusted Analyses of Association With Accidental Overdose Mortality Among Veterans Health Administration Patients
 All PatientsAccidental Overdose Deaths
CharacteristicN%N%Hazard Ratioa95% CI
Total3,291,891100.04,485100.0  
Demographic characteristics 
Male2,962,81090.04,23294.42.071.77–2.42
Age group (years) 
    18–29 (reference)133,8234.11132.5  
    30–39262,2308.067715.13.082.52–3.77
    40–49564,32017.12,24650.14.873.91–6.06
    50–59707,70321.51,13625.32.021.60–2.56
    60–69652,47319.81774.00.370.28–0.48
    70–79757,68923.01052.30.210.16–0.28
    ≥80213,6536.5310.70.260.18–0.39
Charlson comorbidity score ≥11,480,65845.02,05645.81.221.14–1.31
Psychiatric diagnoses 
Any substance use disorder327,63110.02,32451.89.839.00–10.72
Alcohol use disorders278,4188.51,85841.47.767.14–8.44
Drug use disorders187,5705.71,94943.512.5411.42–13.77
Cannabis use disorders44,4661.445910.27.857.00–8.81
Stimulant use disorders86,9102.61,03023.010.429.39–11.56
Opioid use disorders38,5541.293320.821.9519.24–25.05
Other drug use disorders151,0824.61,63236.411.8210.80–12.93
Bipolar I or II disorder96,0992.960613.55.104.55–5.71
Any depressive disorder477,48914.51,94343.34.564.24–4.91
Major depressive disorder218,4266.61,05823.64.293.93–4.69
Other depressive disorder307,6369.41,14325.53.413.16–3.68
Posttraumatic stress disorder206,4236.396221.53.933.61–4.29
Other anxiety disorder240,9057.399022.13.653.32–4.01
Schizophrenia134,9934.159713.33.613.28–3.96
a
All p values <0.001.
Between fiscal years 2000 and 2006, 4,485 members of the cohort died of an accidental overdose. Unadjusted analyses of the association of accidental overdose death with demographic characteristics and psychiatric disorders are reported in Table 1. The risk of accidental overdose was higher among men than women and higher among individuals between the ages of 30 and 59 than both those younger than 30 and those older than 59. All examined psychiatric disorders had a statistically significant unadjusted association with accidental overdose death, with hazard ratios ranging from 3.41 (for non-major depressive disorder depression) to 21.95 (for opioid use disorders). The estimated unadjusted hazard ratio was higher for substance use disorders than for other disorders.
Table 2 reports Cox proportional hazards modeling of the risk of accidental overdose mortality in the study population, adjusted for demographic and nonpsychiatric clinical characteristics. All diagnoses were significantly associated with accidental overdose death (all p values <0.001) after adjustment. However, effect sizes were attenuated after adjustment, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.82 (95% CI=1.66–1.99) for schizophrenia to 8.78 (95% CI=7.73–9.96) for opioid use disorders. Among specific drug use disorders, the risk of accidental overdose was markedly higher for individuals with opioid use disorders than for those with other specific drug use disorders (hazard ratios ranged from 2.86 to 5.16).
TABLE 2. Adjusted Models of the Association of Psychiatric Diagnoses With Any Accidental Overdose Death, Medication-Related Accidental Overdose Death, and Alcohol/Illegal Drug-Related Accidental Overdose Death Among Veterans Health Administration Patientsa
 Any Accidental Overdose DeathMedication-Related Accidental Overdose DeathAlcohol/Illegal Drug-Related Accidental Overdose Death
DiagnosisHazard Ratio95% CIHazard Ratio95% CIHazard Ratio95% CI
Any substance use disorder4.84**4.41–5.304.19**3.81–4.615.92**5.03–6.97
Alcohol use disorders3.73**3.42–4.073.34**3.01–3.714.05**3.46–4.74
Drug use disorders5.57**5.04–6.154.67**4.21–5.197.36**6.08–8.91
Cannabis use disorders2.86**2.55–3.192.39**2.08–2.743.63**2.85–4.65
Stimulant use disorders3.95**3.57–4.372.72**2.37–3.137.03**5.79–8.55
Opioid use disorders8.78**7.73–9.967.37**6.24–8.709.29**7.34–11.76
Other drug use disorders5.16**4.69–5.674.56**4.14–5.035.84**4.93–6.91
Bipolar disorder2.62**2.34–2.932.80**2.48–3.162.01**1.54–2.62
Any depressive disorder2.72**2.54–2.913.02**2.78–3.281.89**1.62–2.20
Major depressive disorder2.44**2.25–2.652.59**2.37–2.831.84**1.54–2.19
Other depressive disorder2.12**1.97–2.282.34**2.12–2.591.60**1.31–1.95
Posttraumatic stress disorder2.55**2.36–2.752.66**2.41–2.932.14**1.76–2.59
Other anxiety disorder2.49**2.28–2.713.07**2.75–3.421.23*1.01–1.50
Schizophrenia1.82**1.66–1.991.75**1.56–1.962.06**1.71–2.47
a
All models adjusted for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, and Veterans Affairs priority status. Medication-related and alcohol/illegal drug-related overdoses are not mutually exclusive.
*p<0.05. **p<0.001.
Table 2 also reports the association of each disorder with medication-related overdose death and alcohol/illegal drug-related overdose death specifically. Of the 4,485 accidental overdose deaths, 1,448 were alcohol/illegal-drug related, and 3,390 were medication-related, with 701 cases that were both alcohol/illegal drug-related and medication-related. Substance-specific data were not available for 348 cases. Comparing the two sets of models, we found that the association of depressive disorders and non-PTSD anxiety disorders was stronger with medication-related overdoses than with alcohol/illegal drug-related overdoses. In contrast, drug use disorders (and particularly cannabis and stimulant use disorders) had stronger associations with alcohol/illegal drug-related overdoses than with medication-related overdoses.
After additional adjustment for substance use disorder status, all other psychiatric diagnoses continued to have a statistically significant association with accidental overdose death (all p values <0.001), with hazard ratios ranging from 1.16 to 1.79 (series 1 in Table 3). Among those with a substance use disorder, the association of other psychiatric disorders with accidental overdose death was significant for all disorders except schizophrenia, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.24 to 1.53 (series 2 in Table 3). Among those without a substance use disorder, all other psychiatric disorders were significantly (all p values <0.001) associated with risk of accidental overdose death, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.47 to 2.39 (series 3 in Table 3). For each non-substance use disorder psychiatric diagnosis, the 95% CIs of the estimated hazard ratio of the association with accidental overdose did not overlap between the series 2 and series 3 models in Table 3, suggesting that the association of these disorders was stronger for those without substance use disorders than for those with substance use disorders. Models testing the interaction of substance use disorder status with each of the other psychiatric disorders confirmed this finding (beta values of interaction terms from –0.3 to –0.5). We also examined the association of having a substance use disorder among those individuals with each non-substance use disorder diagnosis in a separate model, adjusting for the same set of covariates (results not shown). Across models, the estimated hazard ratio of the association of substance use disorder with accidental overdose mortality ranged from 3.06 to 3.53 (all p values <0.001).
TABLE 3. Adjusted and Stratified Models of the Association of Psychiatric Diagnoses With Accidental Overdose Mortality Among Veterans Health Administration Patientsa
 Series 1: Additional Adjustment for Substance Use Disorder StatusSeries 2: Those With Substance Use Disorder OnlySeries 3: Those With No Substance Use Disorder Only
DiagnosisHazard Ratio95% CIHazard Ratio95% CIHazard Ratio95% CI
Bipolar disorder1.57*1.40–1.751.48*1.31–1.662.06*1.72–2.47
Any depressive disorder1.72*1.59–1.851.49*1.37–1.632.09*1.88–2.34
Major depressive disorder1.53*1.42–1.651.42*1.29–1.551.86*1.62–2.14
Other depressive disorder1.44*1.33–1.561.24*1.13–1.361.93*1.70–2.19
Posttraumatic stress disorder1.58*1.46–1.711.42*1.29–1.561.96*1.69–2.28
Other anxiety disorder1.79*1.63–1.961.53*1.38–1.692.39*2.07–2.76
Schizophrenia1.16*1.06–1.271.080.97–1.211.47*1.23–1.77
a
All models adjusted for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, and Veterans Affairs priority status.
*p<0.001.
All adjusted models of non-substance use disorder psychiatric diagnoses are presented together in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Results From a Series of Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Models Examining Accidental Overdose Deaths Among Veterans Health Administration Patients, by Psychiatric Disorder

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively characterize the longitudinal relationship between psychiatric disorders and death from accidental overdose in an adult clinical population. Data from this national cohort of all patients seen in the VA health system within a single year indicate that both substance use disorders and psychiatric diagnoses were consistently associated with an elevated risk of death from accidental overdose. Substance use disorders, particularly opioid use disorders, represented the strongest risk factor for overdose, yet other psychiatric disorders also increased risk of death from overdose.
Effect sizes for all psychiatric disorders were smaller and fairly similar across disorders after adjusting for substance use disorders. However, even in analyses adjusting for comorbid substance use disorders, psychiatric disorders were associated with hazard ratios ranging from 1.2 to 1.8, suggesting that comorbid substance use disorders partially, but not entirely, account for the observed association between psychiatric disorders and accidental death from overdose. These findings suggest that accidental overdose is not just an adverse outcome of substance use but may also result from psychopathology. The consistent positive relationship between psychiatric disorders and accidental overdose suggests that psychological symptoms and problems may play a role in death due to accidental overdose that is similar to the role they play in suicide. Increases in negative mood and hopelessness may result in greater risk taking in terms of use and abuse of drugs, alcohol, and medications. In some cases, the accidental or unintentional overdose may not be a suicide attempt per se but the result of an indifference toward death (20), in contrast with a desire to die, as in the case of many suicide deaths.
Another possible explanation for our findings is that these accidental overdoses observed among patients with psychiatric disorders were simply misclassified suicides. However, the association of age in this study of accidental overdose deaths, with the highest risk of death experienced by persons 30–49 years of age and a steep decline in risk after age 49, was in sharp contrast to the age effect for suicide previously reported in the same population (12), with fairly stable risk of suicide across all ages greater than 30. This would be inconsistent with misclassification if it was due to random error. Moreover, a study using classification and regression tree methods (21) suggests that misclassification of suicide as unintentional overdose is uncommon.
In addition to a direct cause-and-effect relationship, there are several other possible explanations for the relation of psychiatric diagnoses with accidental overdose mortality. Medications indicated for use in the treatment of psychiatric illnesses likely increase the risk for overdose, particularly when combined with alcohol, illegal drugs, and nonpsychiatric medications. This may be particularly true of antianxiety and antidepressant medications (6, 22, 23). The finding that depressive disorders and non-PTSD anxiety disorders had stronger associations with medication-related overdoses than with alcohol/illegal drug-related overdoses provides some support for the salience of medications in the risk of accidental overdose for individuals with these psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, patients with higher levels of psychic distress may be inclined to take more of their medications than prescribed in an effort to reduce distress, which could lead to an increased risk of accidental overdose. Medications may also cause confusion, which in turn could lead to overconsumption of medications when previous medication intake is forgotten. More research is needed to better understand the role of specific prescribing patterns of psychoactive medications in accidental overdose risk.
Another possible explanation is that individuals with psychiatric diagnoses are also more likely to engage in heavy drinking and illegal drug use than individuals without psychiatric diagnoses (24), and some of this variation is likely not captured by substance use diagnoses in the medical record. The stronger associations between each psychiatric disorder and accidental overdose death among those without substance use disorders than among those with substance use disorders may also be due to the fact that the reference groups among those without substance use disorders are less likely to have additional comorbid psychiatric disorders. Other potential mediating factors that could explain the association between psychiatric disorders and overdose include homelessness and incarceration, which are both more common among those with mental illnesses (24, 25) and have been found to be associated with nonfatal overdose risk among substance users (26, 27).
There are several notable limitations to this study. The data are from clinical data in administrative records rather than from interviews with participants, and consequently the rates of undiagnosed psychiatric disorders are unknown. However, clinical diagnoses made in real-world settings may be quite germane when identifying subgroups of patients who may benefit from clinician interventions to reduce risks. The observed relationships may also be an underestimate because diagnoses that were not recorded until after fiscal years 1998 and 1999 were not included. The large sample size resulted in well-powered analyses but may also have resulted in an increase in the risk of type I errors.
This was a study of patients treated by the Veterans Health Administration, and findings may not be generalizable to other health care populations. However, the Veterans Health Administration constitutes one of the largest health systems in the country, and health systems have the opportunity to engage in prevention and intervention strategies to reduce overdose risk in their treatment populations. Indeed, because the recent increase in accidental overdose deaths appears to be related to medication-related poisonings specifically (3), and given recent findings indicating that prescribing patterns may be directly related to overdose risk (28, 29), health systems are particularly relevant to the study of overdose mortality.
Our findings suggest the importance of risk assessment and overdose prevention by mental health providers for patients who have a number of psychiatric conditions. Although patients with substance use disorders (and particularly opioid use disorders) should be a primary target of interventions given the high level of risk associated with these diagnoses, patients with other psychiatric diagnoses also have an elevated risk. Patients with several predisposing diagnoses may particularly benefit from more intensive clinical management, especially those who are being treated with opioids, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and other medications that are toxic in overdose. A number of accidental overdose prevention interventions targeting substance users have been developed with promising results, but these studies have often focused on heroin users (3033). More research is needed to elucidate effective interventions to reduce risk of death from accidental overdose for patients misusing other substances and for patients who have concurrent psychiatric disorders. Our findings also suggest that mental health providers need to assess and address the risk of death from accidental overdose among patients with psychiatric disorders in addition to risk for suicide. The development of evidence-based interventions to reduce accidental overdose among these vulnerable patients is sorely needed.

Footnote

Received Oct. 13, 2010; revisions received April 19 and July 7, 2011; accepted July 15, 2011.

References

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System: Leading Causes of Death Reports. www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
2.
Paulozzi LJ, Budnitz DS, Xi Y: Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006; 15:618–627
3.
Paulozzi LJ, Xi Y: Recent changes in drug poisoning mortality in the United States by urban-rural status and by drug type. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2008; 17:997–1005
4.
Bohnert AS, Fudalej S, Ilgen MA: Increasing poisoning mortality rates in the United States, 1999–2006. Public Health Rep 2010; 125:542–547
5.
Hall AJ, Logan JE, Toblin RL, Kaplan JA, Kraner JC, Bixler D, Crosby AE, Paulozzi LJ: Patterns of abuse among unintentional pharmaceutical overdose fatalities. JAMA 2008; 300:2613–2620
6.
Toblin RL, Paulozzi LJ, Logan JE, Hall AJ, Kaplan JA: Mental illness and psychotropic drug use among prescription drug overdose deaths: a medical examiner chart review. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:491–496
7.
Darke S, Ross J, Hall W: Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia, I: prevalence and correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction 1996; 91:405–411
8.
Galea S, Nandi A, Coffin PO, Tracy M, Markham Piper T, Ompad D, Vlahov D: Heroin and cocaine dependence and the risk of accidental non-fatal drug overdose. J Addict Dis 2006; 25:79–87
9.
Kaye S, Darke S: Non-fatal cocaine overdose among injecting and non-injecting cocaine users in Sydney, Australia. Addiction 2004; 99:1315–1322
10.
Maloney E, Degenhardt L, Darke S, Nelson EC: Are non-fatal opioid overdoses misclassified suicide attempts? comparing the associated correlates. Addict Behav 2009; 34:723–729
11.
Tobin KE, Latkin CA: The relationship between depressive symptoms and nonfatal overdose among a sample of drug users in Baltimore. J Urban Health 2003; 80:220–229
12.
Ilgen MA, Bohnert AS, Ignacio RV, McCarthy JF, Valenstein MM, Kim HM, Blow FC: Psychiatric diagnoses and risk of suicide in veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:1152–1158
13.
Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM: A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol 2002; 12:462–468
14.
Sohn MW, Arnold N, Maynard C, Hynes DM: Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Popul Health Metr 2006; 4:2
15.
McCarthy JF, Valenstein M, Kim HM, Ilgen M, Zivin K, Blow FC: Suicide mortality among patients receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration health system. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 169:1033–1038
16.
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA: Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43:1130–1139
17.
Zivin K, Kim HM, McCarthy JF, Austin KL, Hoggatt KJ, Walters H, Valenstein M: Suicide mortality among individuals receiving treatment for depression in the Veterans Affairs health system: associations with patient and treatment setting characteristics. Am J Public Health 2007; 97:2193–2198
18.
Therneau TM, Grambsch PM: Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2000
19.
Lin DY, Wei LJ: The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 18:1228–1240
20.
Miller PG: Safe using messages may not be enough to promote behaviour change amongst injecting drug users who are ambivalent or indifferent towards death. Harm Reduct J 2009; 6:18
21.
Donaldson AE, Larsen GY, Fullerton-Gleason L, Olson LM: Classifying undetermined poisoning deaths. Inj Prev 2006; 12:338–343
22.
McGregor C, Darke S, Ali R, Christie P: Experience of non-fatal overdose among heroin users in Adelaide, Australia: circumstances and risk perceptions. Addiction 1998; 93:701–711
23.
Gutierrez-Cebollada J, de la Torre R, Ortuno J, Garces JM, Cami J: Psychotropic drug consumption and other factors associated with heroin overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend 1994; 35:169–174
24.
Farrell M, Howes S, Taylor C, Lewis G, Jenkins R, Bebbington P, Jarvis M, Brugha T, Gill B, Meltzer H: Substance misuse and psychiatric comorbidity: an overview of the OPCS National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Addict Behav 1998; 23:909–918
25.
Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA: Mental health and other risk factors for jail incarceration among male veterans. Psychiatr Q 2009; 80:41–53
26.
Bird SM, Hutchinson SJ: Male drugs-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison: Scotland, 1996–99. Addiction 2003; 98:185–190
27.
Kerr T, Fairbairn N, Tyndall M, Marsh D, Li K, Montaner J, Wood E: Predictors of non-fatal overdose among a cohort of polysubstance-using injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 87:39–45
28.
Dunn KM, Saunders KW, Rutter CM, Banta-Green CJ, Merrill JO, Sullivan MD, Weisner CM, Silverberg MJ, Campbell CI, Psaty BM, von Korff M: Opioid prescriptions for chronic pain and overdose: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152:85–92
29.
Bohnert AS, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Ilgen MA, Blow FC: Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA 2011; 305:1315–1321
30.
Darke S, Hall W: Heroin overdose: research and evidence-based intervention. J Urban Health 2003; 80:189–200
31.
Piper TM, Stancliff S, Rudenstine S, Sherman S, Nandi V, Clear A, Galea S: Evaluation of a naloxone distribution and administration program in New York City. Subst Use Misuse 2008; 43:858–870
32.
Seal KH, Thawley R, Gee L, Bamberger J, Kral AH, Ciccarone D, Downing M, Edlin BR: Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: a pilot intervention study. J Urban Health 2005; 82:303–311
33.
Tobin KE, Sherman SG, Beilenson P, Welsh C, Latkin CA: Evaluation of the Staying Alive programme: training injection drug users to properly administer naloxone and save lives. Int J Drug Policy 2008; 20:131–136

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 64 - 70
PubMed: 21955932

History

Received: 13 October 2010
Revision received: 19 April 2011
Revision received: 7 July 2011
Accepted: 15 July 2011
Published online: 1 January 2012
Published in print: January 2012

Authors

Details

Amy S.B. Bohnert, Ph.D.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mark A. Ilgen, Ph.D.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Rosalinda V. Ignacio, M.S.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
John F. McCarthy, Ph.D.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Marcia Valenstein, M.D.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Frederic C. Blow, Ph.D.
From the Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, VA, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Bohnert ([email protected]).

Funding Information

Dr. Blow has received research support or consulting fees from JBS International, Flinn Family Foundation, and Hazelden Foundation. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.Supported by the VA Office of Mental Health Services Patient Care Services and by a Health Services Research and Development Service Career Development Award (CDA-09-204, principal investigator, Dr. Bohnert).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share