Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Six research centers contributed data to the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium (VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hospital de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, London; University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Each study was approved by the local ethical review board, and all participants provided written informed consent to participate in the different studies performed at each center. All centers obtained permission to participate in the consortium from their local ethical review board, and permission for multicenter data analysis was obtained from the ethical review board of the VU University Medical Center.

The study included 436 OCD patients and 382 healthy comparison subjects who underwent 1.5-T structural T₁-weighted MRI scanning (see Tables 1 and 2). All participants were screened for DSM-IV axis I disorders with a standardized structured interview (see the Supplemental Methods section in the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). Patients were recruited through local outpatient or specialist OCD clinics, and healthy subjects through local advertisements. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 or over 65 years, a current psychotic disorder, a recent history of a substance use disorder, mental retardation, and severe organic or neurological pathology, except tic disorder. In patients, psychiatric comorbidity (including tic disorders) was not an exclusion criterion provided that OCD was the primary diagnosis. Healthy comparison subjects had no current axis I psychiatric disorders.

Detailed sociodemographic and clinical data were collected at each center. Age at onset, OCD illness severity ratings, symptom dimension scores, and current medication use were available from most patients (see the online data supplement).

The parameters of the structural scans are listed in Table S1 in the online data supplement. After extensive quality checking (see the data supplement and Table 2), 780 participants (412 patients and 368 healthy subjects; Table 1) were included in the analysis. Data on 530 of these 780 participants have not been published before or been included in previous meta-analyses (see Table S1 in the data supplement).

Group differences in sample characteristics were assessed with SPSS, version 20 (IBM, Armonk, N.Y.). The significance threshold was set at 0.05, two-tailed.

Imaging data processing and analysis were done using optimized voxel-based morphometry (17) in the SPM8 program (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8). After manual reorientation, images were segmented into gray and white matter with the “New Segment” tool (default settings) and resampled to a resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 mm. Using the diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponential Lie algebra algorithm (DARTEL [17], default settings), an analysis-specific group template was created (i.e., with N=780 for the main group analysis and N=412 for within-patient analyses). The gray and white matter images were first warped to the group-specific template using the flow fields (specifying the deformations between each participant’s individual scan and the group-specific template) and subsequently to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space using the warping parameters of the group template to the tissue prior map in standard space. To preserve regional volumetric information, images were modulated during the warping. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, images were smoothed with a 10-mm isotropic Gaussian kernel.

Group effects and age-by-group interactions on regional gray and white matter volume were investigated by feeding the preprocessed gray and white matter images of OCD patients (N=412) and healthy subjects (N=368) into general linear models that always included total gray or white matter, scan sequence, age, gender, and education level as covariates. Aging in healthy individuals is associated with both bilinear (an even rate of change over time) and nonlinear (quadratic; acceleration/deceleration of the rate of change over time) patterns of regional brain volume loss or preservation as compared with global brain volume loss (see reference 18, for example). We therefore assessed the effect of age and age-by-group interactions using both age (bilinear) and age squared (nonlinear) as covariates (18). Multiple linear regression models were used to investigate the effects of age at onset, illness duration, severity of OCD, comorbid major depressive disorder, comorbid anxiety disorders, OCD symptom dimensions, and medication use within patients. To maximize statistical sensitivity by including only relevant within-brain voxels, absolute masking was applied at an estimated optimal threshold of 0.2 (19). For maximal comparability with previous results in the field (e.g., references 9, 20, 21; see also references 2–5), resulting T-maps were thresholded at p<0.001 uncorrected at the voxel level and a minimum cluster extent of 100. Additionally, whole-brain family-wise error, multiple comparison, and nonstationarity corrected cluster-level statistics are reported at a family-wise error corrected p threshold of 0.05 (22).

The OCD group (N=412) and the healthy comparison group (N=368) did not differ in gender, handedness, ethnicity, and total gray matter and white matter volume, but on average the OCD group was significantly older, had a lower education level, and scored higher on all clinical measures (Table 1). As shown in Figure 1, compared with healthy subjects, patients had smaller regional gray matter volume in the left and right dorsomedial frontal cortex (Brodmann’s area [BA] 6/8/9) extending to the anterior cingulate cortex (BA 24/32) and inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula (BA 13/47); greater cerebellar gray matter volume bilaterally; and smaller frontal white matter volume bilaterally (Table 3). Post hoc analyses (see the Supplemental Results section in the online data supplement) showed that scan sequence/site and current medication use did not affect group interaction results.

To ensure that the observed group differences were not confounded by age or education level, we performed a post hoc analysis (N=645) in patient (N=329) and healthy (N=316) samples that were matched on all demographic variables (see the data supplement). Results of this post hoc analysis were similar to those in the larger sample (see Table S2 in the data supplement).

The linear group-by-age interaction analyses (Table 4, Figure 2) showed a relative preservation of right putamen/insular gray matter volume with aging in OCD patients compared with healthy subjects and greater loss of temporal gray matter volume bilaterally. The nonlinear analysis showed a greater loss of fusiform and parahippocampal gray matter and preservation of frontal white matter volume with aging in OCD patients compared with healthy subjects (see the data supplement for within-group effects).

Post hoc matched samples analysis (see Table S3 in the data supplement) confirmed these group-by-age interaction effects, with the putamen/insula cluster reaching family-wise error corrected significance and the nucleus accumbens and inferior and orbitofrontal gray matter reaching the statistical threshold.

Illness severity, illness duration, and age at onset were not significantly related to regional brain volume. Patients on medication at the time of the scan (N=176; mean age, 33.2 years; median time on medication, 24 weeks; missing, N=46) showed significantly greater operculum/posterior insula gray matter volumes and smaller middle frontal gray matter and posterior frontal white matter volumes compared with patients who were not on medication (N=222; mean age, 30.9 years; see Table S4 in the data supplement). Since medicated and unmedicated patients differed in several characteristics, we used stepwise multiple linear regression (see the data supplement) to assess whether the results truly could be attributed to medication. After controlling for demographic and clinical variability, medication effects remained significant only in middle frontal gray matter volume (p=0.014).

OCD patients with one or more comorbid anxiety disorders (N=83) had greater left cerebellar gray matter volume and smaller volumes of the right temporo-occipital gray matter, left superior frontal gyrus, midcingulum, and insula compared with those without comorbid anxiety (N=190; missing data, N=139; for a detailed description of analyses, see the Supplemental Results section and Table S5 in the data supplement). Patients with a lifetime diagnosis of depression (N=101) had a smaller right supplementary motor area gray matter volume compared with patients without (N=287; missing data, N=24). Patients with current comorbid major depressive disorder (N=46) had smaller left frontal gray and white matter volumes compared with those without (N=287).

OCD symptom dimension analyses in patients (N=331; missing data, N=81) showed an association of the presence of aggression/checking symptoms with greater lingual gyrus volume and smaller superior parietal gray and white matter volumes, of hoarding with a smaller right cerebellar gray matter volume, of sexual/religious obsessions with greater middle temporal volume, and of symmetry/ordering with a smaller fusiform gray matter volume (see the Supplemental Results section and Table S4 in the data supplement).

In agreement with prevailing frontal-striatal models of OCD pathophysiology, we found smaller volumes of the left and right medial and inferior frontal gray matter and adjacent white matter in OCD patients compared with healthy subjects. Smaller medial frontal gray matter volume in OCD is in accordance with previous voxel-based morphometry studies (2–5) and with studies showing reduced levels of N-acetylaspartate, a measure of neuronal density, in this region in OCD (23). Smaller volumes of the left and right inferior frontal gyrus extending to the anterior insula were reported once before in OCD (21) but are in contrast with other studies showing greater (e.g., reference 4) or normal (5, 8) inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula volume. Our finding of smaller medial and inferior frontal white matter volumes bilaterally in OCD is notable considering inconsistent previous reports (e.g., references 8–10) and converges with studies showing altered frontal-striatal white matter microstructure in OCD (5). Frontal volume changes may be related to impairments in cognitive functions that have been consistently demonstrated in OCD patients, such as cognitive control and emotion regulation (6), and are associated with altered activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula (1, 7). Smaller medial frontal gray matter volume has been reported in anxiety and depression (3, 24), and in our sample it was more pronounced in patients with additional comorbid anxiety and/or depression, which may thus be indicative of a common pathophysiological mechanism across affective disorders related to a shared deficit in emotion regulation (3, 24). On the other hand, smaller inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula volumes may be a neuroanatomical characteristic more specific to OCD and related disorders (14, 24, 25), although this speculation awaits empirical confirmation.

We found greater cerebellar gray matter volume in OCD patients relative to healthy subjects. The cerebellum is structurally and functionally connected to the parallel cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuits and is thought to integrate cortico-striatal information flow (26). There is accumulating evidence that the cerebellum, besides its role in motor control, is also involved in cognitive and emotional regulatory processes (13, 26, 27). Smaller cerebellar volume has been found in disorders often comorbid with OCD, such as Tourette’s disorder (13), trichotillomania (28), depression, and anxiety (29). Previous studies in adult OCD populations showed smaller (20), normal (2), or greater (4, 5, 8) cerebellar gray matter volume. The cerebellar volume alterations we observed are more extensive than those reported in previous studies (4, 5, 8). Aberrant cerebellar activity has been shown in OCD patients during rest and task performance (1). Cerebellar volume changes may thus be directly related to cognitive dysfunction and OCD symptomatology (26, 27). In the context of the existing literature, our data suggest a greater role for the cerebellum in OCD illness models than is currently recognized.

It has been suggested that abnormal regional brain volume in OCD might result from a combination of abnormal neurodevelopmental processes and additional altered aging-related trajectories due to several factors operating on multiple levels—for example, genetic variations influencing neuronal pruning and aging processes, activity-dependent neuronal plasticity associated with chronic symptoms or compensatory processes, and neurochemical effects of pharmacological treatment or stress (30, 31). Patients showed relative preservation of the putamen, nucleus accumbens, and inferior and orbitofrontal cortex during aging, which was in contrast to the loss associated with healthy aging (18). Evidence from electrophysiology and neuroimaging (1) studies has long indicated the involvement of the basal ganglia in OCD. Greater putamen and caudate volume is often (2–5) but not consistently found, and findings may be dependent on the age of the recruited samples, treatment history, or treatment status (12). We did not find striatal volume alterations in the overall OCD patient group, but in line with a previous report (8), we observed a relatively preserved volume of the putamen and nucleus accumbens during aging in patients. Given the involvement of the putamen in motor behavior, aging-related putamen volume preservation in OCD may be related to activation-induced neuroplasticity as a result of chronic compulsive behaviors (30). Age-by-group interactions in the orbitofrontal cortex and striatum, core nodes of the neural reward circuit (32), may also be the result of compensatory processes. Neuroimaging studies have shown dysfunction in this circuit in OCD during rest (33) and task performance (1), associated with impaired feedback learning, behavioral inflexibility, and a motivational bias toward negative stimuli. Additionally, parts of the inferior frontal lobe adjacent to the inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula regions showing smaller volume overall showed a relative preservation with aging in OCD patients. Besides having a role in cognitive control (6), the inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula is implicated in attention (34), interoceptive awareness (35), and disgust perception (36). Given that these functions are thought to be abnormal in OCD (1, 37), it may be that the observed aging effect in the inferior frontal cortex/anterior insula is related to (compensatory) activation-induced neuroplasticity.

In line with most previous reports (e.g., reference 5), we did not observe volume differences in the amygdala-hippocampal complex in OCD. Our data do indicate, however, that (para)limbic parts of the medial and lateral temporal cortex, regions that are relatively preserved in healthy aging (38), show greater aging-related volume loss in OCD. The fusiform, parahippocampal, and inferior temporal cortices are involved in higher-level visual processing, visual emotional perception (39), and emotional memory formation (40). Greater volume loss in these regions may thus be related to chronic stress and the exaggerated emotional responsiveness seen in OCD (1, 31).

In patients, illness severity, age at onset, and illness duration were not significantly related to regional brain volume, which is in accordance with some (e.g., references 8, 10), but not other (e.g., reference 21) previous studies. It must be noted that age at onset was ascertained retrospectively, and therefore the negative findings must be interpreted in light of this limitation. Although topologically not converging with previous findings (e.g., references 8, 9), the results of the symptom dimension analyses broadly agree with the notion that the various subphenotypes of OCD have overlapping but also unique neural correlates (41), which may in turn reflect genetic and especially environmental influences on each of these phenotypes (42).

Consistent with previous meta-analyses (2, 3), the results from the main group comparisons were robust in controlling for current medication use. The within-patient medication analyses showed opposing effects of medication on dorsal and ventral frontal gray matter. Moreover, only the middle frontal gray matter finding (a region not overlapping with the main group effects) remained significant after we controlled for the differing sample characteristics of the medicated versus unmedicated patients in a multiple regression analysis. Therefore, it is possible that gray matter alterations in the middle frontal cortex may be partially attributable to current medication use, a finding that deserves further investigation, ideally using longitudinal designs (12).

With our study design, we gained statistical power and the ability to assess and control for the effect of participant-level variability by performing an image-based mega-analysis on pooled data. This experimental gain was potentially offset by the introduction of possible confounding effects, such as ethnicity, MRI scanner hardware/sequence, and medication use—confounders that individual well-powered studies may not have. However, we think it is unlikely that these possible confounders affected our results. First, we corrected for site/scanning sequence in all the analyses. Second, group-by-site interaction effects did not explain the group results, and current medication use did not affect the main results. Furthermore, since we included age and education level as covariates in all analyses, and since our results were robust against appropriate age and education level matching with a corresponding sample size reduction, we think it safe to conclude that the reported brain volume alterations in OCD are not explained by demographic variability. A limitation of analyzing age-by-disorder interactions with a cross-sectional instead of a longitudinal study design is that aging-related intrasubject changes cannot be disentangled from possible intersubject differences (18). Assessing group and group-by-age interactions in a large cohort increases statistical sensitivity, but it also introduces intersubject variation that may have caused real effects to be underestimated. Analysis of this data set with a toolbox with putative superior subcortical image segmentation (e.g., FreeSurfer) is a logical future step, since this additionally would ascertain whether the observed regional volume differences are related to differences in cortical thickness or surface area. Additionally, whether our findings also hold true for youths with OCD remains to be ascertained. Of further note is that data for 530 of the 780 participants included in this study have not been published before; divergent findings here may represent methodological differences, the substantial increase in power in the present study, or the inclusion of additional subjects.