Skip to main content
Full access
Perspectives
Published Online: 1 July 2015

The Dynamic Influence of Genes and Environment in the Intergenerational Transmission of Anxiety

Anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders across the lifespan, affecting over 25% of people at some time in their lives (1). They cause substantial difficulties in social, family, educational, or occupational domains and present a risk for other serious disorders, such as depression and substance abuse. The combination of high prevalence, pervasive impairment, and a high degree of persistence and comorbidity means that anxiety disorders have a greater economic burden than any other mental health disorder (2, 3). Understanding the development of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents and later into adulthood is critical to inform prevention and treatment efforts.
Anxiety disorders have an earlier onset than most other mental health disorders, with a median age at onset of 11 years, and over one-half of adults with an anxiety disorder will have met diagnostic criteria in their youth (1). Much research into the development of anxiety disorders has been directed by the finding that they commonly run in families (4). Although both genetic and environmental routes to intergenerational transmission have been implicated, studies examining their relative contribution have typically used a twin-pair design that allows for examination of similarities and differences between sibling pairs but cannot provide information on how or when anxiety symptoms or disorders are transmitted. The study described by Thalia C. Eley, Ph.D., et al. (5), in this issue of the Journal, is applauded for its use of a genetically and developmentally sensitive children-of-twins design in which adult twin pairs (387 monozygotic and 489 dizygotic), their spouses, and adolescent offspring completed measures of anxious personality or symptoms (and neuroticism among a subset). Consistent with previous findings, Eley et al. found evidence to support genetic influences on anxious personality among adults on the basis that associations were higher among monozygotic adult twin pairs than dizygotic pairs. However, genetic effects on the transmission of anxiety were small, and a model reflecting only environmental transmission was the best fit for the data. In other words, anxiety has been passed from parent to adolescent offspring through learning experiences rather than through genetic risk.

Developmental Dynamic Effects

While it may seem counterintuitive that twin-pair associations supported significant genetic associations yet there was little support for a genetic path of intergenerational transmission, one potential explanation for these apparently discrepant findings is genetic innovation, in which different genes are associated with the expression of particular characteristics at different stages in development. For example, in a four-wave longitudinal twin study that assessed participants from age 8 up to age 10, Kendler et al. (6, 7) found that new sets of genetic risk factors associated with fear intensity and anxiety and depression symptoms become active, and others decline in influence, as children move from late childhood into early adolescence, late adolescence, and early adulthood. To fully evaluate this possibility in relation to the intergenerational transmission of anxiety will require a combination of the children-of-twins design and a prospective approach as used by the other teams reporting in this issue on the development in adolescents of bipolar disorder and irritability. In combination, these methods will have the scope to examine differences in monozygotic/dizygotic associations between family members’ anxiety levels when they were at equivalent ages (i.e., the anxiety level of the parents when they were adolescents themselves). This approach holds great promise, and fortunately there are now large longitudinal twin studies that have retained good samples as the twins reach adulthood and begin to have their own children (8), making these sorts of evaluations a realistic possibility in the near future.
The findings by Eley et al. are entirely consistent with models of the intergenerational transmission of affective disorder that suggest that living with a parent with an affective disorder does not only entail a genetic risk but may also increase exposure to potential environmental risk factors (9, 10). Eley et al. note a number of potential environmental mechanisms for the intergenerational transmission of anxiety, in particular parental modeling of anxious responses and negative parenting behaviors (such as overcontrol and rejection). These parental behaviors are hypothesized to promote anxiety among children and young people, especially among those who already experience elevated trait anxiety (11). There is some (albeit inconsistent) support for associations between each of these parenting dimensions and child anxiety, and in some cases (e.g., modeling) these same behaviors have been associated with the presence of parental anxiety disorders (12, 13).
Unlike the Eley et al. study, most studies of parent-child interactions in the context of child anxiety have focused on preadolescent children or included broad age ranges covering childhood and adolescence without taking age into account. This has seriously limited our understanding by failing to consider the substantial normative shifts in parent-offspring interactions that occur as offspring move into adolescence. As will be familiar to many parents, these include increases in the intensity of conflict and decreases in affectionate behaviors. It is not surprising then that where associations between parental behaviors and offspring anxiety disorder status have been compared between children and adolescents, the nature of the association differs significantly. Specifically, parents of adolescents with anxiety disorders exhibit more intrusiveness and lower warm engagement than parents of nonanxious adolescents; however, the reverse pattern is found among children (14). As is true for the Eley et al. study, prospective examination is required to test this proposition, as well as to consider reciprocal relationships between child and parent responses in which anxious children could kindle their parents’ anxiety. Nonetheless, these findings are certainly consistent with the notion that, just as particular genes become active/inactive in their influence on anxiety through development, so do different environmental (and specifically parental) influences.
The study by Eley et al. is emblematic of the application of increasingly sophisticated designs that allow for the identification of complex developmental differences in mechanisms of the intergenerational transmission of anxiety, providing critical information to guide more nuanced approaches to prevention and treatment. As those children who have been recruited in twin studies move into adulthood and have their own children, the possibilities for improving understanding will grow exponentially, including the ability to examine the interactive effects of genes and environment through development. These findings and the work that will inevitably follow highlight the need to preserve large twin studies such as this, which hold promise to push forward theoretical and clinical advances as new generations come on board.

References

1.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:593–602
2.
Smit F, Cuijpers P, Oostenbrink J, et al: Costs of nine common mental disorders: implications for curative and preventive psychiatry. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2006; 9:193–200
3.
Rice DP, Miller LS: Health economics and cost implications of anxiety and other mental disorders in the United States. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 1998; 173:4–9
4.
Merikangas KR, Avenevoli S, Dierker L, et al: Vulnerability factors among children at risk for anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:1523–1535
5.
Eley TC, McAdams TA, Rijsdijk FV, et al: The intergenerational transmission of anxiety: a children-of-twins study. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172:630–637
6.
Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Annas P, et al: A longitudinal twin study of fears from middle childhood to early adulthood: evidence for a developmentally dynamic genome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:421–429
7.
Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Lichtenstein P: A developmental twin study of symptoms of anxiety and depression: evidence for genetic innovation and attenuation. Psychol Med 2008; 38:1567–1575
8.
Trouton A, Spinath FM, Plomin R: Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems in childhood. Twin Res 2002; 5:444–448
9.
Goodman SH, Gotlib IH: Risk for psychopathology in the children of depressed mothers: a developmental model for understanding mechanisms of transmission. Psychol Rev 1999; 106:458–490
10.
Murray L, Creswell C, Cooper PJ: The development of anxiety disorders in childhood: an integrative review. Psychol Med 2009; 39:1413–1423
11.
Wood JJ, McLeod BD, Sigman M, et al: Parenting and childhood anxiety: theory, empirical findings, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003; 44:134–151
12.
Murray L, de Rosnay M, Pearson J, et al: Intergenerational transmission of social anxiety: the role of social referencing processes in infancy. Child Dev 2008; 79:1049–1064
13.
Aktar E, Majdandžić M, de Vente W, et al: Parental social anxiety disorder prospectively predicts toddlers’ fear/avoidance in a social referencing paradigm. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; 55:77–87
14.
Waite P, Creswell C: Observing interactions between children and adolescents and their parents: the effects of anxiety disorder and age. J Abnorm Child Psychol (Epub ahead of print, March 20, 2015)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 597 - 598
PubMed: 26130196

History

Accepted: April 2015
Published online: 1 July 2015
Published in print: July 01, 2015

Authors

Details

Cathy Creswell, D.Clin.Psy., Ph.D.
From the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.
Polly Waite, D.Clin.Psy.
From the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom.

Notes

Address correspondence to Prof. Creswell ([email protected]).

Funding Information

Drs. Creswell and Waite receive research grant support from the Economic and Social Research Council, the Medical Research Council, and the National Institute of Health Research, as well as royalties from Little, Brown Book Group (to Dr. Creswell) and Routledge and Jessica Kingsley (to Dr. Waite). Dr. Freedman has reviewed this editorial and found no evidence of influence from these relationships.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share