Skip to main content
Full access
Editorials
Published Online: 12 May 2021

Better Evidence for Pharmacological Maintenance Treatment in Nonaffective Psychoses: Implications for Relapse Prevention

When dosed properly and administered as part of a comprehensive treatment plan, antipsychotic drugs can be remarkably effective in eliminating the positive symptoms of psychosis in patients with a first episode of nonaffective psychosis (1). The second critically important use of these medications is to help prevent patients from experiencing relapses of acute psychosis (2).
Elevated presynaptic dopamine is understood to be the pathway to a first episode of psychosis and is especially relevant to the acute state of illness (3). Mechanisms include increased synthesis of dopamine, a greater likelihood of release with a stimulus such as amphetamine, and a higher level of intrasynaptic dopamine. Antipsychotic drugs occupy postsynaptic dopamine D2 and D3 receptors to diminish the effects of dopamine released from presynaptic terminals. After treatment of a first episode of psychosis with antipsychotic drugs for at least 1 year, there may be considerable heterogeneity in the effects of drug discontinuation on presynaptic dopamine terminals (4). Patients with higher levels of dopamine synthesis prior to discontinuation were more prone to early relapse. Discontinuation of a dopamine antagonist ought to allow greater access for dopamine to presynaptic receptors, enabling feedback mechanisms to decrease presynaptic hyperactivity; these effects were missing in those who relapse. In contrast, patients who did not relapse in the first 12 weeks showed a reduction in presynaptic dopamine synthesis after discontinuation, consistent with an intact feedback mechanism.
Clinical features of treatment response in an acute episode and after discontinuation are consistent with these mechanisms. Amelioration of positive symptoms begins quickly and evolves to completion or a plateau over a period of weeks (5). Relapse, and the response to treatment of relapses, is more heterogeneous (6). The time course of relapse onset is not a mirror image of treatment response. After antipsychotic discontinuation, worsening of psychotic symptoms can occur over days; more commonly, relapse may not onset for many months after discontinuation. Once a relapse to acute psychosis occurs, the response to medication may take longer and be incomplete compared with the first episode (6, 7).
The risk of return of symptoms after oral antipsychotic drugs are discontinued was described in studies carried out more than 60 years ago (8). As well as initiating the still unresolved debate on how long antipsychotic drugs need to be continued after a first episode, these observations contributed to the rationale behind the development of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations in 1963 (9). Over the next decades, LAI antipsychotics were increasingly used for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, although widespread geographic variation in practice occurred (10). Development of oral dopamine-serotonin antagonist drugs provided a new treatment option with less risk of extrapyramidal side effects. Globally, the use of LAI dopamine antagonists then declined precipitously.
A combined systematic review and meta-analysis reported that the oral formulations of dopamine-serotonin antagonists were more effective than placebo in preventing relapse (risk difference=−0.33, 95% CI=−0.55 to −0.11) and were more effective than the older dopamine antagonists (haloperidol used in 10 of 11 studies, risk difference=−0.11, 95% CI=−0.15 to −0.07) (11). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing oral against LAI antipsychotics showed no difference in protection against relapse (12). However, the findings of meta-analytic studies comparing oral with LAI antipsychotics may be difficult to generalize to real-world settings. In randomized controlled trials, patients are monitored closely for adherence to medication, whether oral or injectable. In practice, patients receiving LAIs are commonly nonadherent to oral antipsychotics. In contrast to the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, studies carried out with national databases, meta-analyses of cohorts, and expert opinions favor LAI antipsychotics over oral formulations for preventing relapse (1315). Comparison of oral and LAI antipsychotic does not answer another common clinical question—the risk of relapse after discontinuing antipsychotic medication. Inclusion of trials with placebo arms helps address this issue.
The report in this issue of the Journal from Ostuzzi and colleagues provides an up-to-date analysis of LAI antipsychotics using a network meta-analysis technique (16). This technique allows comparison of individual drugs against one another, and against placebo, by combining arms from independent randomized controlled trials. Other reports have used this analytic strategy to investigate antipsychotic efficacy. Here, there were two primary outcome measures: number of patients experiencing a study-defined relapse, and number of all-cause dropouts by trial end. The focus was on LAI antipsychotics in trials lasting 12 weeks or longer. Because just less than one-third of the trials included arms with oral antipsychotics, and just over 20% included placebo, comparisons of LAIs with these interventions were also possible.
A broad net was cast, retrieving studies from as long ago as 1968 and featuring 12 different types of LAIs and an aggregate number of 11,505 participants. Results are presented as network plots, along with tables with rankings for each drug. For the primary outcome of relapse, nine of 11 LAIs suitable for analysis were more effective than placebo in preventing relapse (zuclopenthixol and bromperidol being the exceptions). None of the newer LAIs differed from each other; the only head-to-head comparisons demonstrating differences showed paliperidone (3-month formulation), aripiprazole, and fluphenazine to be superior to haloperidol. For the primary outcome of all-cause dropouts, 10 of 12 LAIs available for analysis were more acceptable than placebo (perphenazine and bromperidol being the exceptions). In this analysis, aripiprazole was superior to bromperidol, fluphenazine, paliperidone (1-month formulation), pipothiazine, and risperidone.
In terms of strengths and weaknesses, this meta-analysis includes evaluation of an agent with a somewhat different pharmacology, the dopamine-serotonin partial agonist aripiprazole. Positive results are reported for aripiprazole LAI, particularly for the “acceptability” outcome evaluated through comparison of all-cause dropouts. The study included a series of sensitivity analyses, evaluating the extent of effects on outcomes of excluding trials that were not double blind, trials that used a placebo control, smaller trials carried out before 1990, and trials with a high risk of bias. Twenty-six supplements spanning 179 pages are available online for those wishing more detail. The authors are to be commended for a thorough discussion of eight limitations of their findings requiring consideration when results are applied to the clinical setting. One of these is the constraint placed on interpretations by including only randomized controlled trials. However, the authors also note that the findings of the network meta-analysis of LAIs are largely consistent with the performance of LAIs in a “real-world” effectiveness study involving a cohort of 29,823 patients, with rehospitalization or treatment failure as outcomes (15). The latter study did not include data on aripiprazole LAI.
The large number of studies analyzed by Ostuzzi and colleagues share a common feature of patients who are stable on antipsychotic treatment at the trial onset followed by randomization to study arms that may include an LAI, an oral antipsychotic, or placebo. Not all trials included three types of arms, but the network meta-analysis approach allows the specific type and formulation of a drug (or placebo) in all analyzed arms to be compared one against another. The strongest conclusion was that maintenance treatment with LAIs is superior to placebo, with little difference between LAIs in magnitude of advantage over placebo or in head-to-head comparisons between LAIs. In any study, a portion of patients will relapse in an LAI treatment arm; the mechanism is poorly understood (17). The meta-analysis findings confirm that a greater proportion will relapse in a placebo treatment arm, with a mechanism likely related to those described above. The comparison of these two types of arms, LAI maintenance and placebo maintenance, models the implications of a clinical decision in a patient stabilized on antipsychotic treatment to either continue treatment using an LAI or discontinue active antipsychotic medication.
The report ends by identifying the need for studies to assess the value of LAIs in patients after a first episode of psychosis, rather than reserving this formulation for severe forms of illness. With the advent of well-tolerated LAIs, such a suggestion merits serious consideration. Studies of patients with an optimal response of positive symptoms in first-episode psychosis programs demonstrate the importance of preventing relapse to decrease risk for poor long-term outcomes such as treatment resistance (18). An amalgam of treatment response in first-episode psychosis managed by early intervention teams, and a series of studies of 10-year outcomes of patients from first episodes of psychosis, provides a rationale, illustrated in Figure 1. Full resolution of positive symptoms is the goal for first-episode psychosis, and although this is accomplished in a large majority of cases treated in early intervention programs, the relapse rate is also high, especially during the first 1–3 years. The acute state of a relapse is responsive to antipsychotic treatment. However, relapses appear to be part of the pathway to treatment resistance. Relapses of positive symptoms take longer to respond than during the first episode and are less likely to reach full resolution (6, 7). Although the overall proportion of patients with treatment resistance may be lower in those optimally treated from onset, the total burden of illness remains high.
FIGURE 1. An illustration of the pathway from first episode of psychosis to 10-year outcome, based on data from early psychosis treatment programs in Hong Kong and Toronto (1922)a
a Percentages and width of arrows refer to proportions of patients at each stage. Positive symptoms peak in the acute state of illness, with increased dopamine release. Antipsychotic drug treatment ameliorates positive symptom severity, with full remission of psychosis in a large majority. At least one relapse into acute psychosis is experienced by all but 20% of patients over 10 years; of the latter group, some may not achieve functional recovery because of persistent negative symptoms or cognitive impairment. Patients experiencing one or more relapses are at greater risk to experience persistent symptoms and impairment in social or occupational function. Treatment resistance is observed in 15% of patients followed from engagement with an early intervention service; this proportion may be higher in those with less intensive early treatment.
A trial assessing the maintenance of oral antipsychotic treatment after resolution of the acute phase showed continued protection against relapse for 3 years or longer (2, 18). Studying LAIs optimized for acceptability, compared with oral antipsychotics and initiated soon after resolution of the acute phase, may represent the next step forward in improving long-term outcomes and preventing what can be the devastating consequences of nonaffective psychotic disorders in young patients.

References

1.
Chen EYH, Hui CLM, Lam MML, et al : Maintenance treatment with quetiapine versus discontinuation after one year of treatment in patients with remitted first episode psychosis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010 ; 341 : c4024
2.
Hui CLM, Lam BST, Lee EHM, et al : Perspective on medication decisions following remission from first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2020 ; 225 : 82 – 89
3.
Howes OD, Kambeitz J, Kim E, et al : The nature of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and what this means for treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012 ; 69 : 776 – 786
4.
Kim S, Shin SH, Santangelo B, et al : Dopamine dysregulation in psychotic relapse after antipsychotic discontinuation: an [18F]DOPA and [11C]raclopride PET study in first-episode psychosis. Mol Psychiatry (Epub ahead of print, Sept 14, 2020)
5.
Agid O, Kapur S, Arenovich T, et al : Delayed-onset hypothesis of antipsychotic action: a hypothesis tested and rejected. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003 ; 60 : 1228 – 1235
6.
Emsley R, Chiliza B, Asmal L, et al : The nature of relapse in schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2013 ; 13 : 50
7.
Takeuchi H, Siu C, Remington G, et al : Does relapse contribute to treatment resistance? Antipsychotic response in first- vs. second-episode schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019 ; 44 : 1036 – 1042
8.
Good WW, Sterling M, Holtzman WH : Termination of chlorpromazine with schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1958 ; 115 : 443 – 448
9.
Kinross-Wright J, Vogt AH, Charalampous KD : A new method of drug therapy. Am J Psychiatry 1963 ; 119 : 779 – 780
10.
Patel MX, Taylor M, David AS : Antipsychotic long-acting injections: mind the gap. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 2009 ; 52 : S1 – S4
11.
Leucht S, Barnes TRE, Kissling W, et al : Relapse prevention in schizophrenia with new-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry 2003 ; 160 : 1209 – 1222
12.
Kishimoto T, Robenzadeh A, Leucht C, et al : Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Schizophr Bull 2014 ; 40 : 192 – 213
13.
Correll CU, Citrome L, Haddad PM, et al : The use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: evaluating the evidence. J Clin Psychiatry 2016 ; 77 ( suppl 3 ): 1 – 24
14.
Kishimoto T, Hagi K, Nitta M, et al : Effectiveness of long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Schizophr Bull 2018 ; 44 : 603 – 619
15.
Tiihonen J, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Majak M, et al : Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in a nationwide cohort of 29 823 patients with schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 2017 ; 74 : 686 – 693
16.
Ostuzzi G, Bertolini F, Del Giovane C, et al : Maintenance treatment with long-acting injectable antipsychotics for people with nonaffective psychoses: a network meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2021 ; 178 : 424 – 436
17.
Rubio JM, Taipale H, Correll CU, et al : Psychosis breakthrough on antipsychotic maintenance: results from a nationwide study. Psychol Med 2020 ; 50 : 1356 – 1367
18.
Hui CLM, Honer WG, Lee EHM, et al : Long-term effects of discontinuation from antipsychotic maintenance following first-episode schizophrenia and related disorders: a 10 year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018 ; 5 : 432 – 442
19.
Agid O, Arenovich T, Sajeev G, et al : An algorithm-based approach to first-episode schizophrenia: response rates over 3 prospective antipsychotic trials with a retrospective data analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2011 ; 72 : 1439 – 1444
20.
Chan SKW, Chan HYV, Honer WG, et al : Predictors of treatment-resistant and clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a 12-year follow-up study of first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Schizophr Bull 2021 ; 47 : 485 – 494
21.
Chan SKW, Hui CLM, Chang WC, et al : Ten-year follow up of patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder from an early intervention service: predictors of clinical remission and functional recovery. Schizophr Res 2019 ; 204 : 65 – 71
22.
Hui CL, Honer WG, Lee EH, et al : Predicting first-episode psychosis patients who will never relapse over 10 years. Psychol Med 2019 ; 49 : 2206 – 2214

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
Go to American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry
Pages: 369 - 371
PubMed: 33979537

History

Accepted: 16 March 2021
Published in print: May 01, 2021
Published online: 12 May 2021

Keywords

  1. Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
  2. Antipsychotics

Authors

Details

William G. Honer, M.D. [email protected]
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, and British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Honer ([email protected]).

Competing Interests

Dr. Honer has received consulting fees from or served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Guidepoint, In Silico, Newron, and Translational Life Sciences, and he holds or has held shares in AbCellera, Eli Lilly, and Translational Life Sciences.

Funding Information

Supported by the Jack Bell Chair in Schizophrenia and the British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share