Psychotic-Like Speech in Frontotemporal Dementia
Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Abstract
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) may result in psychotic-like speech without other psychotic features. The authors identified a bvFTD subgroup with pressure of speech, tangentiality, derailment, clanging/rhyming, and punning associated with the right anterior temporal atrophy and sparing of the left frontal lobe.
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder known for alterations in socioemotional behavior. Patients with bvFTD develop apathy, disinhibition or social impropriety, compulsions or stereotypies, lack of empathy, and dietary changes along with deterioration of frontal and anterior temporal regions.1 Many patients also develop poverty of speech with primarily decreased verbal output and fluency, and some develop nonfluent progressive aphasia.2
In the absence of poverty of speech, a subgroup of patients with bvFTD have had positive speech and language features reminiscent of psychosis and leading to the misdiagnoses of schizophrenia or mania.3 We evaluated the speech and language of well-diagnosed patients with bvFTD, divided them into those with and without poverty of speech, and then compared them on other psychotic-like language and speech features and MRI.
Methods
Among bvFTD patients enrolled in the UCLA Behavioral Neurology Clinic, we evaluated 12 who met International Consensus Criteria for probable bvFTD with supportive frontal-anterior temporal changes on clinical MRI.1 These patients were part of an institutional review board-approved study.
The examining clinician completed the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC) from the initial presentation examinations.4 The TLC assesses formal thought disorder based on clinical observation of 18 items rated on 0–3 or 0–4 scales, with an additional global severity rating score. The TLC has good interrater reliability.4,5 On the initial TLC item, the bvFTD patients were divided into two groups: those with (PvSp+) and without poverty of speech (PvSp–). The groups were then compared on the remaining 17 “positive psychotic-like speech” items.
In order to compare clinical MRI scans from different scanners and institutions between the PvSp+ and PvSp– groups, we coded them with a visual inspection method.6 The visual scale rated frontal and anterior temporal atrophy in each hemisphere on a 0- to 4-point scale from “absent” to “severe.” Prior interrater reliability for this MRI visual scale was rs=0.42 for 72 ratings (p<0.001).6
Statistical Analysis
The PvSp+ and PvSp– groups were compared on general characteristics, TLC global and item severity scores, and MRI visual ratings using t tests (except chi-square test for sex) for low sample sizes where continuous variables test of normality (Shapiro-Wilks) permitted.7 TLC items not normally distributed were further compared with the Mann-Whitney U statistic.
Results
General Characteristics
Among the 12 bvFTD patients (male, N=5; female, N=7), the mean age at presentation was 59.0 years [±11.6], and they had a mean of 16.1 years [±1.8] of education, with an initial mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 27.3 [±2.2]. On the TLC, all 12 bvFTD patients had symptoms (mean global severity rating score=1.0 [±0.58]), with the severity scores disclosing a division between nine patients with poverty of speech and three with no poverty of speech.
PvSp– Versus PvSp+ Comparison
There were no differences on age, gender, education, or MMSE scores. On the TLC global severity ratings, which were normally distributed for both groups (Shapiro-Wilks significance: PvSp–: 0.59 and PvSp+: 0.24), the PvSp– group had significantly worse scores (PvSp–: 1.85 [±0.08] versus PvSp+: 0.72 [±0.31], t=6.06, df=10, p=0.001).
On the 17 positive speech items of the TLC, the PvSp– group accounted for most symptoms, including 78% of all high severity scores (3 or 4) (see Table 1). Although individual item distributions were not normally distributed on the Shapiro-Wilks test, four items had significantly worse (Mann-Whitney U at the 0.009 level) severity scores in the PvSp– group compared with the PvSp+ group: pressure of speech, tangentiality, derailment, and clanging.
| Item | PvSp+ | PvSp– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severity Score Mean±SD | % | Severity Score Mean±SD | % | |
| Poverty of content of speech | 1.22±1.09 | 67 | 2.67±0.58 | 100 |
| Pressure of speechb | 0 | 0 | 2.0±1.0 | 100 |
| Distractible speech | 1.0±0.87 | 67 | 2.0±1.0 | 100 |
| Tangentialityb | 1.0±1.12 | 56 | 4.0±0 | 100 |
| Derailmentb | 0.22±0.44 | 22 | 2.0±0 | 100 |
| Incoherence | 0.56±0.53 | 56 | 1.33±1.15 | 67 |
| Illogicality | 0.33±0.50 | 33 | 1.0±0 | 100 |
| Clangingb | 0.33±1.0 | 11 | 4.0±0 | 100 |
| Neologisms | 0 | 0 | 0.33±0.58 | 33 |
| Word approximations | 0 | 0 | 0.67±0.58 | 67 |
| Circumstantiality | 1.0±1.0 | 56 | 3.0±0 | 100 |
| Loss of goal | 1.44±1.01 | 78 | 3.0±0 | 100 |
| Perseveration | 1.44±1.13 | 78 | 3.0±0 | 100 |
| Echolalia | 0.56±0.88 | 33 | 2.33±0.58 | 100 |
| Blocking | 0.11±0.33 | 11 | 0.33±0.58 | 33 |
| Stilted speech | 0 | 0 | 0.67±0.58 | 67 |
| Self-reference | 0.22±0.44 | 22 | 1.0±0 | 100 |
a
PvSp+: patients with poverty of speech; PvSp–: patients without poverty of speech.
b
PvSp+ and PvSp– patients were significantly different for pressure of speech, tangentiality, derailment, and clanging (Mann-Whitney U; p=0.009).
On MRI visual ratings, the PvSp– group, compared with the PvSp+ group, had greater right anterior temporal atrophy (1.56 [±0.88] versus 3.0 [±0.0]; t=−2.74, p=0.02) and less left frontal atrophy (see Figure 1) (2.0 [±0.5] versus 1.0 [±1.0]; t=2.37, p<0.04). The PvSp– and PvSp+ groups did not differ in right frontal (2.22 [±0.67] versus 3.0 [±0.0]) and left temporal (1.33 [±1.22] versus [1.0±1.0]) atrophy.
FIGURE 1. Composite Views of Lesions in the Three Patients Without Poverty of Speech (PvSp–) Superimposed on T1 Axial MRI (Radiological Convention)a
a The lesion area for the three patients are outlined, and the regions of overlap are indicated by diagonal lines. A) The PvSp– patients had greater right anterior temporal atrophy and less left frontal atrophy compared with B) the nine patients with poverty of speech [PvSp+]), who had more symmetrical frontotemporal disease. L: left; R: right.
Illustrative Case Report
A 41-year-old right-handed man with 19 years of education had a progressive change in personality characterized by incessant talking, rhyming, repeating himself, and “obsessions.” He was obsessed with eating carbohydrates, watching certain TV shows, and a number of other behaviors. He lacked insight regarding his changes in behavior. There were no delusions, hallucinations, or criteria for mania or depression. On examination, he was talkative to the point of difficulty interrupting him, and he was tangential or off-track in his commentary. He continually focused on specific words, either rhyming, clanging, or punning. For example, he continually repeated: “The Pope is a dope without hope”; and he played on the nonsense word “pog,” rhyming it with dog and log. He repeated the word “pistachio,” stating that he had a friend named Pistachio, so eating them would be cannibalism. The rest of his examination showed executive dysfunction and right frontotemporal atrophy on MRI, most prominent in the right anterior temporal lobe, with sparing of the left frontal lobe.
Discussion
Although patients with bvFTD often have poverty of speech, there are few reports of positive speech and language features typically associated with schizophrenia or mania.3 Yet, 25% of our sample of bvFTD patients presented with absent poverty of speech and positive features on the TLC scale in the absence of delusions, hallucinations, or other psychotic or manic features.4 In these patients, the speech and language features were not psychotic in nature, but rather reflected underlying frontotemporal behavioral disturbances. Neuroimaging indicated right-sided frontotemporal involvement, with prominent right anterior temporal atrophy and relative sparing of left hemisphere frontal language areas.
Our PvSp– bvFTD subgroup had significant severity scores for pressure of speech, tangentiality, derailment, and clanging. The pressure of speech was difficult to interrupt, and although not accompanied by other manic symptoms, it cannot be entirely distinguished from secondary mania associated with right hemisphere disease. They were also tangential in response to questions, a process often seen in right frontal disease,8 and had “derailment,” a related process in which they go off on their own with loosely related or totally unrelated commentary. Finally, they had significant clanging, where they would repeat words and their associations based upon the word sounds. Clinicians often associate clanging with the disorganized speech of schizophrenia.4,5,9 Possibly as part of an overall fixation with word sounds, the PvSp– bvFTD patients also had punning, or the humorous use of words to suggest two or more of its meanings or similarly sounding words.10
These changes are localized to injury in the right frontal and anterior temporal regions. First, right frontal disease can result in tangentiality with digressions, rambling, and free association of ideas to the point of confabulation.3,8,11 Patients with right predominant bvFTD may also have a tendency toward childish humor and compulsive punning.10,12 Second, sparing of the left frontal and left temporal areas, including regions of language and rhyme judgments, may be critical to releasing positive language and speech symptoms. Recent functional MRI evidence, for example, indicates that rhyme judgment tasks involve the left inferior frontal cortex.13 Third, right anterior temporal lobe atrophy contributes to word sounds preoccupation in these patients. BvFTD with medial temporal disease but spared lateral temporal areas in the language-dominant hemisphere may result in compulsions for wordplay, poetry, rhyming, and punning, similar to other compulsive-like behaviors that occur in this disorder.14 In summary, right frontotemporal hypofunction could lead to left frontotemporal disinhibition with enhanced rhythm appreciation and release of rhyming abilities.15
There are limitations to this report that make the findings preliminary. The TLC comparison was not blinded and involved a limited number of patients. Nevertheless, it does disclose a subgroup of three bvFTD patients who are distinct in their psychosis-like speech and language characteristics. In addition, the attempt to localize differences on MRI images was hampered by the different origins of their clinical MRI scans. The findings, however, are highly suggestive of differences to be explored in future studies.
In conclusion, a subgroup of bvFTD patients with prominent right temporal atrophy and sparing of the left frontal lobe develop pressure of speech, tangentiality, and derailment, as well as clanging, rhyming, and punning from a fixation on the sounds of words. This preliminary study recommends a prospective, blinding evaluation of positive psychotic-like speech and language features among patients with bvFTD.
References
1.
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al: Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134:2456–2477
2.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al: Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76:1006–1014
3.
Ziauddeen H, Dibben C, Kipps C, et al: Negative schizophrenic symptoms and the frontal lobe syndrome: one and the same? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011; 261:59–67
4.
Andreasen NC: Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC). Schizophr Bull 1986; 12:473–482
5.
Peralta V, Cuesta MJ, de Leon J: Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia: a factor analytic study. Compr Psychiatry 1992; 33:105–110
6.
Mendez MF, Kremen SA, Tsai PH, et al: Interhemispheric differences in knowledge of animals among patients with semantic dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol 2010; 23:240–246
7.
de Winter JCF: Using the student’s t-test with extremely small sample sizes. Pract Assess, Res Eval 2013; 18:1–12
8.
Alexander MP, Benson DF, Stuss DT: Frontal lobes and language. Brain Lang 1989; 37:656–691
9.
Covington MA, He C, Brown C, et al: Schizophrenia and the structure of language: the linguist’s view. Schizophr Res 2005; 77:85–98
10.
Granadillo ED, Mendez MF: Pathological joking or Witzelsucht revisited. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016; 28:162–167
11.
Novoa OP, Ardila A: Linguistic abilities in patients with prefrontal damage. Brain Lang 1987; 30:206–225
12.
Clark CN, Nicholas JM, Henley SM, et al: Humour processing in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a behavioural and neuroanatomical analysis. Cortex 2015; 69:47–59
13.
Kareken DA, Lowe M, Chen SH, et al: Word rhyming as a probe of hemispheric language dominance with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2000; 13:264–270
14.
Wu TQ, Miller ZA, Adhimoolam B, et al: Verbal creativity in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. Neurocase 2015; 21:73–78
15.
Mendez MF: Generalized auditory agnosia with spared music recognition in a left-hander: analysis of a case with a right temporal stroke. Cortex 2001; 37:139–150
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 30 March 2016
Revision received: 19 June 2016
Accepted: 11 August 2016
Published online: 6 October 2016
Published in print: Spring 2017
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
NIA: R01AG034499
Supported by the National Institute on Aging (grant R01AG034499).Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).