Full access
Articles
Published Online: 3 April 2017

Unmet Need for Specialty Mental Health Services Among Children Across Europe

Viviane Kovess-Masfety, M.D., Ph.D., Julia Van Engelen, B.A., Lisanne Stone, Ph.D., Roy Otten, Ph.D., Mauro Giovanni Carta, M.D., Adina Bitfoi, M.D., M.P.H., Ceren Koc, B.A., Dietmar Goelitz, Ph.D., Sigita Lesinskiene, M.D., Zlatka Mihova, Ph.D., Christophe Fermanian, Ph.D., Ondine Pez, Ph.D., and Mathilde Husky, Ph.D. [email protected]Authors Info & Affiliations
Publication: Psychiatric Services
Volume 68, Number 8
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600409
PDF/EPUB

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of use of mental health services for children across Europe, with a specific focus on differences in the availability of mental health resources.

Methods:

Data were drawn from the School Children Mental Health in Europe Project. Parent- and teacher-reported child mental health status was based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Sociodemographic characteristics of parents and children, as well as academic performance and use of mental health services in the previous 12 months, were collected. Countries were categorized as having high versus low mental health resources. The sample comprised 4,894 schoolchildren in seven countries.

Results:

Across Europe, only 25.6% of children with a mental disorder had received mental health services in the previous 12 months, including 31.5% in high-resources countries and 18.9% in low-resources countries (p=.001) (N=4,867). The presence of any mental disorder, maternal psychological distress, gender, living in a single-parent home, and low academic performance were determinants of service use. The effect of resources group on the likelihood of receiving services remained significant when the analyses controlled for all predictors (odds ratio=1.41, p<.01). Determinants differed between groups—maternal psychological distress was associated with service use in high-resources countries, and gender was associated with service use in low-resources countries.

Conclusions:

The findings point to a substantial portion of unmet need across Europe and to major differences in access to care in low- versus high-resources countries. Efforts are needed to address unmet need among children with mental disorders, especially in low-resources countries.
In the United States, only half of the children with mental health problems receive mental health services (1). In Europe, the proportion of children with unmet need is even greater. For instance, in the Netherlands, only 42.5% of the children with severe mental health problems receive mental health services (2). In Germany, this percentage is even lower—a large population study revealed that 18.6% of children with mental health problems sought help from mental health professionals (3). The surprisingly high level of unmet need found in countries that have well-developed health care systems raises concern. Moreover, it stimulates questions about the status of unmet need in less affluent European countries, where the mental health care system is not as developed and where mental health professionals are less available compared with wealthier member states (4).
The fact that a substantial portion of children with mental health problems do not receive mental health services, even in Europe’s most affluent countries, is troublesome considering the long-term consequences of untreated mental health problems (5). It is therefore important to identify the determinants that are associated with the use of mental health services in both affluent and less affluent countries.
Differences in service use by children from the same country can also be expected. Studies on service use in Europe have found that mental health services are used more often in lower socioeconomic groups (3,6–8). However, it can also be argued that the impact of socioeconomic status on service use depends on the organization of the health system (9). In other words, if a country has a well-developed health system that is accessible to persons of all income groups, the effect of socioeconomic status might diminish. In addition, the recognition by parents and teachers of mental health problems among children and the acknowledgment that the nature of the problem is related to mental health might further modulate access to care to appropriate services (10).
Finally, individual factors, such as parental psychological distress (11), parental education level, and marital status (7,11), have also been shown to be related to use of child mental health services, although the role of these individual factors has been disputed. In addition, several child-related factors are correlated with the use of services, including gender (9) and age (3,8,9,12). Poor academic performance may be associated with greater specialty service use (8), and the type of problem behavior (externalizing or internalizing) may also influence parental help-seeking behaviors (9).
The objective of the study was to examine the determinants of use of specialty mental health services for children with mental health problems. First, the role of availability of mental health resources on the relationship between child mental health and service use was evaluated by comparing use of child mental health services in two groups of countries classified as having high versus low mental health resources. Second, the role of additional factors in use of child mental health services was examined; these factors included maternal education level, marital status, and psychological distress; child gender and age; academic performance; and type of mental health problem.

Methods

Participants

Data were drawn from the School Children Mental Health in Europe Project, a cross-sectional survey conducted in the Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey in 2010. Approximately 50 primary schools were randomly selected in each country. Classes within each school were randomly selected, and approximately six children were randomly selected from each class. At every school there were a total of 48 participating children, except in the Netherlands and Germany, where more children were approached. A detailed description of these procedures is presented elsewhere (13). Passive consent was used—parents of the selected children received a written informed consent form and were told to sign and return the form to school should they refuse to participate. Children were included if they were present on the day of the assessment, unless their parent actively refused to provide consent.
Among participating schools, an average of 63.4% of selected children participated, with a response rate ranging from 50.5% (Turkey) to 90.5% (the Netherlands). The response rate for West Germany was 53.9%; East Germany, 54.3%; Lithuania, 57.7%; Italy, 62.6%; Bulgaria, 64.1%; and Romania, 67.5%. Participating children’s teachers were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the child’s mental health and to document the child’s academic performance. Parents received a packet containing background questions about their sociodemographic characteristics and a questionnaire regarding their child’s mental health status, which they were invited to return in a prepaid envelope. All countries received approval from relevant local ethical review boards. [A list of each country’s ethical review boards is available as an online supplement to this article.]
The total sample comprised data for 8,439 children, 7,321 teachers, and 6,031 parents. Overall, data from both parent and teacher reports were available for 5,670 children (13). Children were between the ages of six and 12 years old, with a mean age of 8.7±1.4. Because most of the parent respondents were female (81.8% of the total sample), only children whose mother completed the questionnaire were included in this study, given that gender is known to influence some of the measures that were used. In 4% of the cases, the questionnaire was completed by a stepmother, a grandmother, or a female foster parent. As a result, the final sample included data for 4,894 children, and data on service use was documented for a total of 4,867 children.
Countries were classified as having high or low mental health resources on the basis of the number of mental health specialists per 100,000 inhabitants, as summarized in Table 1 (4,14–19). Western European countries in general appeared to spend more financial resources on mental health services (20). However, Lithuania had more psychiatrists, child psychiatrists, and psychologists per capita compared with other Eastern European countries, an indication of a more developed mental health system (21). As a result, Lithuania was classified in the high-resources group along with the Netherlands, Italy, and Germany. Low-resources countries included Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey.
TABLE 1. Countries with high and low mental health resources, as indicated by number of psychiatrists, child psychiatrists, and psychologists per 100,000 inhabitants
Level of resourcesSourceGPsaPsychiatristsChild psychiatristsPsychologists
High     
 GermanySamele et al., 2013 (15); Margraf, 2014 (16) (for psychologists)65.915.25.056.2
 ItalySamele et al., 2013 (15)75.87.83.168.3
 The NetherlandsSamele et al., 2013 (15); Boer, 2013 (17)73.018.82.7100.0
 LithuaniaBraddick et al., 2009 (4); Samele et al., 2013 (15)74.017.83.27.7
Low     
 BulgariaBraddick et al., 2009 (4); Samele et al., 2013 (15)63.26.7.3.9
 RomaniaBraddick et al., 2009 (4); Samele et al., 2013 (15)67.76.41.24.5
 TurkeyTatar et al., 2011 (32); Ministry of Health, 2006 (18); and World Health Organization, 2010 (19)56.21.0.31.0
a
Source: World Health Organization/Europe (14). GPs, general practitioners

Measures

Child mental health status.

The child’s mental health was measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (21,22). Both the parent and child’s teacher completed the SDQ. The SDQ contains 25 items divided into five subscales (hyperactivity/inattention, internalizing problems, conduct problems, peer problems, and prosocial behaviors). The SDQ is a widely used instrument that has demonstrated satisfactory reliability with good internal consistency (mean Cronbach α=.73), cross-informant correlation (mean=.34), and retest stability after four to six months (mean=.62) (21).
In this study, the diagnostic algorithms provided by the instrument’s authors, which combine informants and impact scores (http://www.sdqinfo.org/c4.html), were used to define unlikely, possible, or probable cases of internalizing or emotional disorders and externalizing disorders (conduct disorders and hyperactivity disorders) (23). Each of these variables was then recoded to represent the absence (unlikely or possible) or presence (probable) of each class of disorders.

Use of mental health services.

Respondents indicated whether the child attended a visit in the previous 12 months to each of the following types of health professionals: general practitioners, pediatricians, psychiatrists, child psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, and social workers. Use of mental health services was defined as at least one visit in the previous 12 months to any mental health professional (psychologist, child psychiatrist, psychotherapist, and social worker). Visits to a general practitioner or pediatrician were excluded, given that the reason for the visit was not collected.

Determinants of service use.

The determinants of use included maternal education level (high school or less, high school graduate, college or more, or other), marital status (single or in a relationship), and psychological distress; gender and age of the child; and academic performance reported by a teacher (average to high academic performance or low academic performance).
Maternal psychological distress in the previous four weeks was assessed using the five-item mental health subscale of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (24). This widely used instrument has been validated in numerous languages (25). Respondents are asked, “How much time during the past four weeks: Have you been a very nervous person? Have you felt so down in the dumps nothing could cheer you up? Have you felt calm and peaceful? Have felt downhearted and depressed? Have you been a happy person?” Possible responses range from all of the time to none of the time. Answers are recoded to obtain a score of 0 to 100. For European countries, a cut point of 52 has been established to determine the presence of psychological distress (26). The SF-36 has good construct validity, high internal consistency, and high test-retest reliability and is strongly correlated with the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (27,28).

Data Analysis

Using chi-square tests, descriptive analyses were conducted to examine which factors were associated with use of mental health services. The factors included in the analyses were child mental health, gender, age, and academic performance; and maternal psychological distress, marital status, and education level. Odds ratios were also determined, using the logit procedure. Logistic regressions were performed in the overall sample by using the variables that were significantly associated with service use in the univariate analyses (p≤.10) These regressions were repeated to include interactions with mental health resources group. Next, a logistic regression was conducted separately for countries with high and low resources by using the same variables. Finally, logistic regression analyses, controlling for all predictors mentioned in the tables, were performed separately for each type of probable mental disorder. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical analyses. Data analysis was conducted with Stata SE, version 13.1.

Results

Descriptive Statistics

Across Europe, only 25.6% of children with a mental disorder had received mental health services in the previous 12 months, including 31.5% in high-resources countries and 18.9% in low-resources countries (p=.001). Table 2 presents characteristics of the sample for all variables used in this study as well as the proportion of children associated with each characteristic who used mental health services in the past 12 months. Overall, 7.5% of children received services from a mental health professional in the previous 12 months, including 8.4% of children in the high-resources countries and 6.5% of children in the low-resources countries. The proportion of children who received services varied significantly by most parent and child characteristics variables. However, the presence of a disorder was a main predictor of the use of services.
TABLE 2. Unadjusted odds of using mental health services in the previous 12 months among 4,867 children from seven countries with high or low mental health resources, by children’s sociodemographic and clinical characteristics
   Use of mental health services    
CharacteristicN%N%pOR95% CIp
Country’s mental health resources    .009   
 High resources2,58255.02188.4 1.331.08–1.65.010
 Low resources (reference)2,28545.01486.5    
 Total4,867 3667.5    
Parent characteristic        
 Maternal education level    .476   
  High school or less (reference)57113.3396.9   .479
  High school graduate1,59037.11167.3 1.07.73–1.56 
  College or more1,63338.11227.5 1.09.75–1.59 
  Other49211.5275.5 .78.47–1.30 
 Marital status    .001   
  Single70114.88512.1 1.961.51–2.53.001
  In a relationship (reference)4,02985.12656.6    
 Maternal psychological distress    .001   
  Yes82517.711013.3 2.261.78–2.87.001
  No (reference)3,83282.32446.4    
Child characteristic        
 Gender    .001   
  Boy2,44650.32299.4 1.721.38–2.14.001
  Girl (reference)2,42149.71375.7    
 Age    .550   
  5.0–8.7 years2,23753.91627.2 1.07.86–1.32.550
  8.8–13.0 years (reference)2,61246.12017.7    
 Academic performance    .001   
  Low68914.710515.2 2.772.17–3.53.001
  Average or high (reference)3,99885.32676.1    
 Any disordera    .001   
  Yes55711.414225.6b 6.284.97–7.93.001
  No (reference)4,30988.52235.2    
 Conduct disorder    .001   
  Yes3777.89725.9 5.504.23–7.15.001
  No (reference)4,48392.22676.0    
 Emotional disorder    .001   
  Yes1583.23824.0 4.222.88–6.19.001
  No (reference)4,70296.73267.0    
 Hyperactivity    .001   
  Yes962.03839.5 8.875.80–13.55.001
  No (reference)4,76798.03266.9    
a
Includes conduct disorder, emotional disorder, or hyperactivity
b
The percentage of children with a disorder who used mental health services was higher in high-resources countries (31.5%) compared with low-resources countries (18.9%) (p=.001).

Predictors of Mental Health Service Use Across Europe

In a logistic regression (Table 3), the availability of mental health resources predicted the use of mental health care, indicating that greater availability of mental health services was associated with higher odds of use of these services when the analyses were adjusted for key determinants. The presence of any probable mental disorder was the strongest predictor of mental health service use (odds ratio=4.61). Single-parent homes were associated with increased use of services, as were maternal psychological distress, child male gender, and poor academic performance. However, with the exception of the presence of any probable diagnosis, predictors of service use in high- and low-resources countries were not identical.
TABLE 3. Predictors of use of mental health services by 4,387 children from countries with high and low mental health resourcesa
 High resources (N=2,379)Low resources (N=2,008)Total (N=4,387)High vs. low mental health resources
PredictorAORbp95% CIAORbp95% CIAORbp95% CIAORbp95% CI
Any disorder (reference: none5.61.0013.95–7.973.38.0012.15–5.304.61.0013.50–6.071.71.0421.01–2.87
Single parent marital status (reference: in a relationship)1.35.113.93–1.941.57.060.98–2.501.44.0121.08–1.92.95.869.52–1.72
Maternal psychological distress (reference: none)1.96.0011.39–2.771.30.228.85–2.001.65.0011.26–2.161.63.075.95–2.80
Male (reference: female)1.35.063.98–1.851.60.0181.08–2.371.45.0031.13–1.85.90.689.55–1.48
Low academic performance (reference: average or high)1.43.056.99–2.071.45.121.91–2.321.41.0191.06–1.891.25.432.72–2.17
Countries with high mental health resources (reference: low resources)      1.41.0051.11–1.79   
a
Use of mental health services was defined as any visit with a mental health professional in the previous 12 months.
b
Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) are adjusted for all variables presented in the table in a logistic regression. Data were missing for some of the variables adjusted for in the model.
Examining specific probable disorders did not strongly modify the observed effects. However, ADHD had a significant effect on use of services in the high-resources countries, which was not found in the low-resources group, although the ADHD × resources group interaction was not significant (Table 4).
TABLE 4. Odds of use of mental health services by 4,387 children from countries with high and low mental health resources, by category of disordera
 High resources (N=2,379)Low resources (N=2,008)Total (N=4,387)High vs. low mental health resources
DisorderAORp95% CIAORp95% CIAORp95% CIAORp95% CI
ADHD (reference: no ADHD)5.81.0013.30–10.241.8.319.56–5.774.56.0012.78–7.483.21.0701.66–4.31
Conduct disorder (reference: no conduct disorder)4.43.0012.85–6.282.70.0011.63–4.473.56.0012.61–4.851.61.114.89–2.88
Emotional disorder (reference: no emotional disorder)3.72.0012.15–6.442.96.0011.52–5.743.29.0012.16–5.001.42.422.61–3.31
a
The analyses controlled for marital status, maternal psychological distress, and child gender and academic performance in each resources group and in the total group. Data were missing for some of the variables adjusted for in the model. Use of mental health services was defined as any visit with a mental health professional in the previous 12 months.

Discussion

This study sought to identify the factors associated with use of specialty mental health services among children in European countries with high or low mental health resources. A greater proportion of children living in a country characterized by high mental health resources received specialized help for a mental health problem compared with children in countries with low resources. Furthermore, the presence of a probable disorder was more strongly associated with receiving services in countries with greater resources.
In this study, only 25.6% of children with a probable mental disorder received any services in the previous 12 months. Importantly, any service use was construed as any visit with a psychiatrist, psychologist, therapist, or social worker. The study did not document the number of visits nor did it collect data on the use of psychotropic medication. Therefore, access to services is likely to be overestimated, considering that one visit is not sufficient to appropriately treat a child’s mental disorder. That being said, a substantial level of unmet need for mental health services has been reported in a number of regions around the world (1–3). Unmet need may be related to stigmatization and taboos surrounding mental health problems, particularly in European countries with low mental health resources. Parents in these countries may be reluctant to seek help from a professional because of a fear of social judgment (4,29). This possibility opens clear avenues for targeted communication efforts and information campaigns for these populations. In addition, increasing mental health resources may significantly decrease unmet need for services.
The lack of mental health resources remains a major contributor to the low percentage of children with minimal access to specialty mental health care. There are substantial between-country differences in resources among European Union (EU) member states. Recent articles underlined the difficulties faced by countries that were part of the Soviet Union or the Soviet-led Eastern Bloc, such as Bulgaria (30) and Romania (31), in trying to design mental health plans. These countries have been working on these plans with the support of the World Health Organization and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) since 2000–2001. Since joining the EU in 2007, these countries have implemented laws to protect the human rights of psychiatric patients and have made efforts to establish outpatient care and reduce long inpatient stays, albeit with only limited results.
In Turkey the situation is also dire (32); all of these countries are highly dependent on NGOs that are not sustainable; thus the mental health care organization is fragile, understaffed, and underfunded. However, Lithuania, a former Soviet country that joined the EU in 2004, is more advanced. It has been able to develop child psychiatric care, thanks in part to support from Nordic countries, and is now considered a country with high mental health resources, which illustrates the possibilities for improvement among EU countries that have fallen behind.
After adjustment for other determinants, analysis of the overall sample showed that boys were more likely than girls to receive mental health services, a finding that is in line with existing literature (8,9,12). Furthermore, in the total sample, having a single parent and maternal psychological distress were associated with more frequent use of mental health services (7,11). It has been suggested that maternal psychological distress may cause the mother both to experience and to report the child’s behavior as more problematic compared with mothers without psychological distress and may directly affect the child’s behavior (33). In contrast with previous findings, however, use of mental health services did not increase with age. The latter result could be explained by the fact that this study focused on young children between the ages of six and 12, providing a limited range for studying the effects of age.
Importantly, in stratified analyses examining the predictors of access to care in high- versus low-resources countries, significant differences were found. In low-resources countries, maternal psychological distress was not related to a child’s likelihood of receiving care. That contrasts with the finding that maternal psychological distress was a predictor of care in high-resources countries. This finding may point to the fact that different factors are implicated in maternal psychological distress in low- versus high-resources countries. In countries with lower resources, the factors that contribute to maternal psychological distress, such as poverty, may keep the focus on basic needs rather than on the child’s mental health status (34,35).
Several limitations should be acknowledged when interpreting the findings. First, the assessment of mental health services was a dichotomous variable indicating the presence of any visit with a mental health professional and did not reflect minimally adequate treatment. Additional studies are needed in European countries with low and high resources to better understand the actual care that is provided to children in terms of the number of visits, the type of provider, and the use of psychotropic medication. Furthermore, the study did not comprise visits to a general practitioner or pediatrician, who may be de facto providers of mental health care for children.
Second, assessment of child mental health was based on parent and teacher reports rather than on clinical evaluation. Third, the study did not include all relevant predictors of child service use. For example, there may be important differences in low- and high-resources countries regarding parents´ conceptualizations of whether child symptomatology is a reflection of mental disorders, differences in help-seeking attitudes, and stigma associated with mental disorders and mental health treatment. Fourth, high- and low-resources countries were classified on the basis of information that we were able to find in the literature. It may be that the estimates of mental health professionals do not fully reflect the availability of resources. Questions about the comparability of results that use SDQ indicators to identify cases of mental disorders have recently been raised in a cross-national study comparing five- to 16-year-old children in considerably diverse population samples from Yemen, Brazil, Great Britain, Norway, India, and Russia (36). However, in that study, the comparison used various indices based on the SDQ total difficulties score and did not use the diagnostic algorithms used in this study. A recent publication examining the prevalence of mental disorders across Europe suggested that it may be appropriate to use the SDQ as an indicator of the probable presence of externalizing disorders. The study found that identification rates for these disorders was acceptable, although the SDQ was only moderately able to detect internalizing disorders (37). In addition, the results may not generalize to children who do not attend school at all or to children who attend specialized schools because of learning difficulties, mental health problems, or other impairments. Last, a larger sample might have yielded more precise estimates of the associations observed.

Conclusions

This study reported rates of use of mental health services among children ages six to 12 across countries in Europe with low or high mental health resources. The findings point to a substantial portion of unmet need across Europe and to major differences in access to care between the two groups of countries. Furthermore, the determinants of access to care differed between high- and low-resources countries. Overall, the results suggest that important efforts are needed to address a serious level of unmet need among children with mental disorders, especially in countries with low mental health resources. In addition, research in this area is needed to evaluate access to specialty services among European adolescents and to understand how children from racial and ethnic minority groups access care in their local areas. Recent political events have led to major changes in a number of European nations due to a massive flow of refugee populations, of whom a large portion are youths. Future European studies should pay particular attention to these displaced youths, who are likely to be at particularly high risk for mental health problems and for whom specialized mental health services may be particularly difficult to obtain.

Supplementary Material

File (appi.ps.201600409.ds001.pdf)

References

1.
Merikangas KR, He J-P, Brody D, et al: Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among US children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics 125:75–81, 2010
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
2.
Bot S, de Roos S, Sadiraj K, et al: Focus on Youth. The Hague, Netherlands Institute of Social Research, 2013. https://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2013/Terecht_in_de_jeugdzorg
Google Scholar
3.
Wölfle S, Jost D, Oades R, et al: Somatic and mental health service use of children and adolescents in Germany (KiGGS-study). European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 23:753–764, 2014
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
4.
Braddick F, Carral V, Jenkins R, et al: Child and Adolescent Mental Health in Europe: Infrastructures, Policy and Programmes. Luxembourg, European Communities, 2009
Google Scholar
5.
Hofstra MB, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC: Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: a 14-year follow-up of a Dutch epidemiological sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 41:182–189, 2002
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
6.
Lurie OR: Parents attitudes toward children’s problems and toward use of mental health services: socioeconomic differences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 44:109–120, 1974
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
7.
Pavuluri MN, Luk S-L, McGee R: Help-seeking for behavior problems by parents of preschool children: a community study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 35:215–222, 1996
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
8.
Wichstrøm L, Belsky J, Jozefiak T, et al: Predicting service use for mental health problems among young children. Pediatrics 133:1054–1060, 2014
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
9.
Zwaanswijk M, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM, et al: Help seeking for emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents: a review of recent literature. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 12:153–161, 2003
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
10.
Mojtabai R: Serious emotional and behavioral problems and mental health contacts in American and British children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 45:1215–1223, 2006
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
11.
Sourander A, Helstelä L, Ristkari T, et al: Child and adolescent mental health service use in Finland. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 36:294–298, 2001
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
12.
Kataoka SH, Zhang L, Wells KB: Unmet need for mental health care among US children: variation by ethnicity and insurance status. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:1548–1555, 2002
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
13.
Kovess V, Carta MG, Pez O, et al:. The School Children Mental Health in Europe (SCMHE) Project: design and first results. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 11(supp 1 M7):113–123, 2015
PubMed
Google Scholar
14.
European Health for All Database (HFA-DB). Copenhagen, World Health Organization/Europe. http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb. Accessed May 11, 2016
Google Scholar
15.
Samele C, Frew S, Urquía N: Mental Health Systems in the European Union Member States, Status of Mental Health in Populations and Benefits to Be Expected From Investments Into Mental Health. Brussels, European Commission, 2013
Google Scholar
16.
Margraf J: On the Situation of Psychology [in German]. Bochum, Germany, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 2014
Google Scholar
17.
Boer F: Dutch child and adolescent psychiatry in practice; developments in the last fifteen years [in Dutch]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 55:619–624, 2013
PubMed
Google Scholar
18.
National Mental Health Policy of Turkey. Ankara, Ministry of Health of Turkey, 2006
Google Scholar
20.
Dlouhy M: Mental health policy in eastern Europe: a comparative analysis of seven mental health systems. BMC Health Services Research 14:42, 2014
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
21.
Goodman R: Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 40:1337–1345, 2001
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
22.
Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RC, et al: Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 13:254–274, 2010
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
23.
Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick M: Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 9:129–134, 2000
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
24.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30:473–483, 1992
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
25.
Ware JE Jr, Gandek B: Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51:903–912, 1998
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
26.
Kovess V: The State of the Mental Health in the European Union. Brussels, European Commission, 2004
Google Scholar
27.
Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S: SF-36 physical and mental component summary measures: a user’s manual. Boston, New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1994
Google Scholar
28.
McCabe CJ, Thomas KJ, Brazier JE, et al: Measuring the mental health status of a population: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MHI-5). British Journal of Psychiatry 169:516–521, 1996
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
29.
Knapp M, McDaid D, Mossialos E, et al (eds): Mental Health Policy and Practice Across Europe. Maidenhead, United Kingdom, McGraw Hill Open University Press, 2007
Google Scholar
30.
Dimova A, Rohova M, Moutafova E, et al: Bulgaria health system review. Health Systems in Transition 14:1–186, 2012
PubMed
Google Scholar
31.
Vlãdescu C, Scîntee SG, Olsavszky V, et al: Romania health system review. Health Systems in Transition 18:1–170, 2016
PubMed
Google Scholar
32.
Tatar M, Mollahaliloğlu S, Şahin B, et al: Turkey health system review. Health Systems in Transition 13:1–186, 2011
PubMed
Google Scholar
33.
Amrock SM, Weitzman M: Parental psychological distress and children’s mental health: results of a national survey. Academic Pediatrics 14:375–381, 2014
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
34.
Dehue T: The depression epidemic. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 50:797–798, 2008
Google Scholar
35.
Edwards JB, Gomes M, Major MA: The charged economic environment: its role in parental psychological distress and development of children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 23:256–266, 2013
Crossref
Google Scholar
36.
Goodman A, Heiervang E, Fleitlich-Bilyk B, et al: Cross-national differences in questionnaires do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder prevalence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 47:1321–1331, 2012
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
37.
Kovess-Masfety V, Husky MM, Keyes K, et al: Comparing the prevalence of mental health problems in children 6–11 across Europe. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 51:1093–1103, 2016
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Psychiatric Services
Go to Psychiatric Services

Cover: Michigan Summer, by Ivan Albright, no date. Watercolor and gouache on paper. Mary and Earle Ludgin Collection, 1981.1164. © The Art Institute of Chicago.

Psychiatric Services
Volume 68 • Number 8 • August 01, 2017
Pages: 789 - 795
PubMed: 28366116

History

Received: 6 September 2016
Revision received: 9 November 2016
Accepted: 5 January 2017
Published online: 3 April 2017
Published in print: August 01, 2017

Keywords

  1. Child psychiatry/general
  2. access to care
  3. determinants
  4. Mental health systems/hospitals
  5. unmet need

Authors

Affiliations

Viviane Kovess-Masfety, M.D., Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Julia Van Engelen, B.A.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Lisanne Stone, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Roy Otten, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Mauro Giovanni Carta, M.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Adina Bitfoi, M.D., M.P.H.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Ceren Koc, B.A.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Dietmar Goelitz, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Sigita Lesinskiene, M.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Zlatka Mihova, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Christophe Fermanian, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Ondine Pez, Ph.D.
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author
Mathilde Husky, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dr. Kovess-Masfety is with the Department of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, and with the EHESP French School of Public Health, where Dr. Fermanian and Dr. Pez are affiliated, both in Paris. Ms. Van Engelen, Dr. Stone, and Dr. Otten are with Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands. Dr. Carta is with the Department of Public Health, Center of Liaison Psychiatry, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. Dr. Bitfoi is with the Romanian League for Mental Health, Bucharest, Romania. Ms. Koc is with the Yeniden Health and Education Society, Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Goelitz is with Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Dr. Lesinskiene is with the School of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Lithuania. Dr. Mihova is with the Department of Psychology, New Bulgaria University, Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr. Husky is with the Department of Psychology, University of Bordeaux, France.
View all articles by this author

Notes

Send correspondence to Dr. Husky (e-mail: [email protected]).

Competing Interests

The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Funding Information

European Union: 2006336
This study was funded by a grant from the European Union (2006336).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard
Tips for downloading citations

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Item saved, go to cart
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

PPV Articles - Psychiatric Services

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share