Clinical Correlates of Aggressive Behavior After Traumatic Brain Injury

The study group consisted of 89 consecutive patients with closed head injury admitted to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (n = 58) and the Iowa Methodist Medical Center, in Des Moines, Iowa (n = 31). A diagnosis of TBI was substantiated by history of posttraumatic amnesia that lasted at least 30 minutes after the traumatic event. Patients with penetrating head injuries or associated spinal cord injury were excluded from the study.

Patients who had severe comprehension deficits (those who were unable to complete part II of the Token Test¹⁹), which precluded a thorough neuropsychiatric evaluation, were also excluded from the study. Our control group comprised 26 patients consecutively admitted to the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics with multiple traumas but without clinical or radiological evidence of nervous system involvement—that is, without primary or secondary brain damage or spinal cord injury. Sixty-seven of the 89 patients with TBI (75.3%) and 19 of the 26 patients in the control group (73.1%) were injured in a motor vehicle accident. All 115 patients gave written informed consent for participation in this study.

We used two measures of severity of traumatic brain injury. The first was the 24-hour Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. In this measure, scores from 13 to 15 indicate mild head injury, scores from 9 to 12 indicate moderate head injury, and scores from 4 to 8 indicate severe head injury.²⁰ Patients who have a GCS score in the 13–15 range but who underwent intracranial surgical procedures or presented with focal lesions greater than 15 cc, however, were considered to have suffered a moderate head injury.²¹ The second measure we used was the duration of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA).²² The PTA period was estimated retrospectively through a structured interview that proved to have a high correlation with other prospective determinations of PTA duration. We also assessed whether medical complications occurred that might have contributed to secondary brain damage, such as hypoxia or arterial hypotension.

Traumatic brain injury was also classified according to the criteria proposed by the Traumatic Coma Data Bank (TCDB).²³ This classification is based on the presence of a diffuse or mass (focal) lesion on initial CT scan.

Aggressive behaviors were assessed with the OAS. The OAS defines four categories of aggressive behavior, each of which is given a weighted score. Verbal aggression is scored 1 to 4 points, physical aggression against objects, 2 to 5 points, and physical aggression against self or others, 3 to 6 points per incident. The aggression score (AS) is the sum of the weighted scores of the most severe behaviors in each category; the maximum AS is 21. We defined significant aggressive behavior as an AS more than 3 or a score of 3 with physically aggressive behavior. Aggression occurring in the context of delirium or during the period of posttraumatic amnesia was not considered in this study. Patients who had at least four episodes of significant aggressive behavior and had AS scores of 3 or greater constituted our aggressive group. The nonaggressive group included all patients who did not meet the aggressive behavior criteria during the 6-month period following PTA.

Assessment of premorbid aggressive behavior is hindered by potential retrospective bias, particularly among patients with TBI. In order to use a measure that would not be subject to such bias, we registered the frequency of aggressive behaviors that resulted in police intervention and legal actions (e.g., assault and domestic violence) among the TBI and control groups. Information on the latter was obtained from the patient, close relatives, and other informants who knew the patient well and from medical records.

All patients were assessed by a fully trained psychiatrist using two semistructured interviews, a modified version of the Present State Examination²⁴ designed to elicit symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID).²⁵ The severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)²⁶ and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A).²⁷ The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)²⁸ was used as a global measure of cognitive functioning. Impairment in activities of daily living was assessed with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).²⁹ Social functioning was quantitatively assessed using the Social Functioning Exam (SFE) and the Social Ties Checklist (STC).³⁰ SFE scores range from 0 (greatest satisfaction) to 1 (least satisfaction). STC scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating less social support. Initial SFE and STC scores assessed social functioning before the traumatic episode. The reliability and validity of each of these instruments have been demonstrated in brain-injured populations.³¹

CT and occasionally MRI scans were obtained as part of the standard clinical evaluation in the emergency and neurosurgery departments of institutions involved in the study. The nature, extent, and location of traumatic lesions were classified according to the Traumatic Coma Data Bank (TCDB) criteria and registered through the use of appropriate TCDB forms. A neurologist trained in assessment of structural neuroimaging scans who was blind to the RESULTS of the psychiatric examination read all scans.

Background characteristics, results of neuropsychiatric assessment, and mean GCS score were analyzed by Student's t-test (two-tailed) using mean and standard deviations. Frequency distributions of background characteristics, results of neurological assessment, and major and minor depression were analyzed using chi-square tests, or Fisher's exact test (two-tailed), if sample sizes were prohibitively small.

The background characteristics of the study and control groups are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences between patients with traumatic brain injury and trauma patients without brain injury in age, gender, race, years of education, or Hollingshead social class. The degree of functional impairment as measured by FIM scores was not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, there were no significant differences between the TBI patients and the control group patients in the frequency of a history of mood or anxiety disorders, of alcohol or other substance abuse, or of aggressive behavior that warranted legal intervention prior to the traumatic episode. However, posttraumatic aggression was significantly more frequent among patients with brain injury than those in the control group (Fisher's exact test, P=0.03).

Of the 89 patients who suffered a traumatic brain injury, 30 of them (33.7%) met the aforementioned criteria for the presence of significant aggressive behavior during the first 6 months after the traumatic episode. The remaining 59 patients (66.3%) constitute the nonaggressive group.

The background characteristics of the two groups are summarized in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the aggressive and the nonaggressive groups in age, gender, race, years of education, socioeconomic status, or history of anxiety disorder. In addition, the frequencies of hypoxia and hypotension, the two most significant complications contributing to secondary brain damage, were not significantly different between the aggressive and the nonaggressive groups (hypoxia, 9.6% versus 7.5%; hypotension, 4.8% versus 5.0%). Patients in the aggressive group had a significantly higher frequency of a history of a mood disorder (χ² = 6.72, df = 1, P = 0.01), alcohol abuse (χ² = 7.12, df = 1, P = 0.008), and substance abuse (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.007) than those in the nonaggressive group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the frequency of alcohol or substance abuse during the month preceding the onset of aggression. In addition, five of 30 TBI patients with aggression had a history of legal intervention for aggressive behavior, compared with one of 59 nonaggressive TBI patients (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02; data not shown).

Results of the neuropsychiatric evaluations are summarized in Table 3. A diagnosis of major depression was significantly more frequent in the aggressive group than in the nonaggressive group (χ² = 6.54, df = 1, P = 0.01). Of the 30 patients in the aggressive group, aggressive behavior and major depressive disorder occurred simultaneously in 17 (56.7%) of them. There was no significant difference in the frequency of minor depression between patients in the aggressive and nonaggressive groups. Compared with the nonaggressive group, patients in the aggressive group had significantly higher HAMD scores (t=–3.51, df =87, P=0.0007) and HAMA scores (t=–3.37, df=87, P=0.001) and had significantly poorer social functioning (t=–3.27, df=87, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between the aggressive and nonaggressive groups in MMSE, FIM, and STC scores.

Neurological findings are summarized in Table 4. Severity of brain injury as measured by either GCS scores or the duration of PTA was not significantly different between aggressive and nonaggressive patients. Fourteen patients had focal frontal lobe lesions, six patients had focal frontal lobe lesions and radiological evidence of diffuse injury, 18 patients had focal lesions in other areas of the brain, nine patients had non-frontal-lobe focal brain lesions and radiological evidence of diffuse injury, and 39 patients had diffuse brain injury. There was no between-group difference in the frequency of right or left hemisphere lesions. However, patients in the nonaggressive group had a greater frequency of diffuse injury than aggressive patients (χ² = 3.95, df = 1, P = 0.047), and the frequency of frontal lobe lesions was significantly higher among patients in the aggressive group (χ² = 8.05, df = 1, P =0.005). In addition, patients with focal frontal lobe lesions showed significantly higher mean AS scores than patients with focal lesions in other brain areas (4.1 ± 4.0 versus 1.4 ± 2.7, t = 2.78, df = 45, P = 0.008).