Skip to main content
Full access
REGULAR
Published Online: 1 July 2007

The Effect of Divalproex Sodium on HIV Replication In Vivo

Publication: The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
D ivalproex sodium and its metabolite, valproic acid, are anticonvulsant drugs used in the treatment of mania and seizure disorders. 1, 2
Initial in vitro data showed that valproic acid activates HIV replication at concentrations frequently reached in the plasma of valproic acid-treated patients. 35 One postulated mechanism for this increase in replication is through the inhibition of glutathione reductase, resulting in lower levels of glutathione. 4 Study results have been inconsistent, with valproic acid activating HIV replication in some cell lines but not in others. 35 Nonetheless, the findings raised concerns about the use of valproic acid in HIV-positive patients, 69 in particular, the potential for an increase in HIV viral load and the potential emergence of viral resistance. 8 Clinical evidence addressing this issue is limited. One retrospective study 10 examining 11 patients found that divalproex sodium administration in the presence of antiretroviral treatment did not cause a clinically meaningful increase in HIV replication. This study was limited by its small sample size and its retrospective nature, which resulted in incomplete follow-up data on other clinical factors that may have affected HIV viral load. More recently, an in vivo study by Lehrman et al. 11 postulated a potentially beneficial impact of valproic acid on HIV replication, noting the ability of valproic acid to deplete HIV infection in resting CD4+ T-lymphocyte cells in vivo, which may lead to improved viral suppression when valproic acid is used in conjunction with antiretroviral medication. This small proof-of-concept study showed that valproic acid induced the expression of HIV from the resting CD4+ T-lymphocyte cells of aviremic patients but did not activate new infection. 11 Table 1 summarizes the results of the in vitro and in vivo studies.
TABLE 1. Summary of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies Examining the Impact of Valproic Acid on HIV Replication
In order to further understand the clinical impact of the use of divalproex sodium in patients with HIV disease, we undertook this study to prospectively determine whether divalproex sodium causes an increase in HIV replication over a 1-month period when administered to patients with HIV disease for treatment of mania/bipolar disorder, or dementia with behavioral distrubances secondary to HIV.
Our hypothesis, based on the retrospective review 10 as well as our clinical experience, was that divalproex sodium would not increase HIV replication sufficiently to produce a clinically significant increase in HIV viral load, particularly if the patient were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHOD

Our study used an observational prospective design. We asked all patients 18 years of age and older who had HIV disease and presented to the HIV Psychiatry Program of St. Michael’s Hospital to participate in our inception cohort, provided they met the following criteria:
1.
The patient had a current clinical diagnosis of a manic/hypomanic episode, bipolar mood disorder, dementia with mania or behavioral disturbances secondary to HIV infection.
2.
The patient made a decision with his or her treating psychiatrist to begin treatment with divalproex sodium.
In keeping with the observational nature of our study, all treatment decisions were made between the treating psychiatrist and the patient. Divalproex sodium dosing was flexible with the titration schedule created at the discretion of the treating psychiatrist, aiming for a usual daily treatment dose of 1000 to 1500 mg/day. Final stable treatment dose was established based on symptom control, side effect profile, and valproic acid level.
Study personnel assessed each participant prior to initiating treatment with divalproex sodium (visit 1), at day 5 after divalproex sodium therapy was initiated (visit 2), and at day 5 after a stable treatment dose of divalproex sodium was achieved (visit 3). The time elapsed between visits 1 and 3 ranged from 2.1 to 5.1 weeks with a mean of 3.2 weeks.
Stable treatment dose was defined as the optimal dose to control symptoms in an individual patient. The measurement intervals were chosen to reflect time-to-steady-state divalproex sodium drug levels, and to closely approximate intervals used in the in vitro studies, which showed that valproic acid increases HIV replication 5 to 14 days after exposure to divalproex sodium. 35 In addition, the measurement intervals reflect the Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents, 12 which suggest that viral load be tested at 2 to 8 weeks after initiating or changing antiretroviral therapy, as a decision point for monitoring the impact of changes to a therapy regimen.
In our study, an increase in Log 10 HIV viral load ≥0.5 was used as a marker for a clinically significant increase in HIV viral load. This is consistent with the current Guidelines for the Treatment of HIV Disease in Adults and Adolescents, 12 which uses this value to define virological failure and clinical progression.
Participants completed a demographic/clinical questionnaire at visit 1. At all visits, participants completed mood rating scales, including the Clinician Administered Rating Scale for Mania 13 and the Beck Depression Inventory, 14 and a 4-day retrospective, medication adherence self-report questionnaire (adapted from the University of California at San Francisco’s Adherence Follow-up Questionnaire for HIV Disease); 15 we measured their HIV viral load using the Quantiplex HIV RNA 3.0 Assay (Chiron Corporation). 16 Valproic acid level testing was completed during visits 2 and 3.
Participants were paid $10.00 per visit as remuneration for participation, and up to an additional $10.00 per visit to cover travel costs. Our study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of St. Michael’s Hospital. Voluntary informed consent was obtained from each participant.

RESULTS

Eight patients were enrolled in our study, including five with a manic or hypomanic episode, two with bipolar mood disorders who were making changes to their mood stabilizers, and one with dementia secondary to HIV infection, with behavioral disturbances.
We evaluated the eight study patients between May 1999 and January 2001. They were primarily male (7:1) and were an average age of 43.50 (SD=10.18) years. Their average baseline CD4+ cell count was 156.88 (SD=187.97) cells/mL, and their average baseline viral load was 125,468.75 (SD=173,815.96) copies/mL. One patient had a nondetectable viral load at baseline (i.e., viral load<50 cells/mm 3 ). HIV disease staging using the 1993 Centers for Disease Control classification system was A (asymptomatic) N=2, B (symptomatic, non-AIDS) N=2, and C (AIDS) N=4. The average time since their HIV diagnosis was 10.88 years (SD=2.85 years). Four patients were taking antiretroviral therapy at visit 1, and a fifth patient began antiretroviral therapy between visits 2 and 3.
The summary of baseline clinical and measured laboratory variables for individual cases is listed in Table 2 .
TABLE 2. Summary of Baseline Clinical Variables and Measured Laboratory Variables for Individual Cases
One patient had a nondetectable viral load, and it remained nondetectable over the course of the study. Three patients had a decrease in viral load, and four had an increase in viral load. The decrease in viral load for patient 5 coincided with the start of antiretroviral therapy. Of the patients with an increase in viral load, those taking antiretrovirals had the smallest increases. Their Log 10 HIV viral load increases did not exceed 0.08. Their average change in Log 10 HIV viral load was −0.29 (SD=0.69). The proportion of participants with an increase in Log 10 viral load ≥0.5 was 0/8 (95% confidence interval=0% to 34%). No patients stopped divalproex sodium use due to medication intolerance.

DISCUSSION

This study prospectively examined the clinical significance of in vitro data showing that HIV replication increased with exposure to valproic acid. 35 In this study, no patient had an increase of Log 10 viral load ≥0.5. Four individuals in this series had a smaller increase in HIV viral load. The impact of this small increase on clinical HIV disease progression is unclear. No study patients who were without antiretroviral medications at visit 1 had an increase in viral load sufficient to necessitate starting antiretroviral therapy, and no patients taking HAART at visit 1 had an increase in viral load sufficient to necessitate a change in their antiretroviral regimen. The largest increase in HIV viral load (0.28 and 0.16 Log 10 viral load) occurred in two individuals who were not taking antiretrovirals. A third individual, whose antiretrovirals were stopped for 12 days prior to visit 3, had the next highest increase in viral load, at 0.08 Log 10 viral load. It is possible that the role of antiretroviral medication, and strict adherence to that regimen, is important in limiting the impact of any divalproex sodium drug-virus interaction.
The pilot nature of this study does not allow us to make firm conclusions from these data; however, we postulate that the concerns raised by the in vitro studies demonstrating up-regulation of HIV replication may not be clinically significant. Other factors, including the body’s natural immune response and the use of antiretroviral medications, likely offset any significant interaction. Alternatively, the 2005 suggestion by Lehrman et al. 11 of the benefit of valproic acid, when used with antiretrovirals, in inducing expression of HIV from resting CD4+ T-lymphocyte cells may be the more important drug-virus interaction in the in vivo situation.
Our results must be interpreted and applied with caution, given the limitations of our study design, small sample size, short length of follow-up, clinical heterogeneity of sample, and absence of a comparison group. It is possible that a true increase in viral load may have occurred as a result of the drug-virus interaction, which we failed to detect due to our small sample size, low power, and short follow-up duration. Enrollment in this study was lower than anticipated and may have been due to a decreased prevalence of late-stage HIV disease complications seen in the era of widespread availability of antiretroviral medications, including lower rates of HIV mania and HIV dementia. As primary and secondary mania remain a significant psychiatric complication in HIV-positive patients in resource limited countries, 17 it is important that future research be undertaken to more definitively address this question using a larger patient sample enrolled in a multisite double-blind, randomized, control trial.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an operating grant from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network. This paper was presented as an abstract at the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine 48th Annual Meeting in San Antonio, TX, November 2001, and received an award for “Best poster by a trainee.”

Footnote

Received April 4, 2006; revised September 3, 2006; accepted September 26, 2006. Drs. Maggi and Halman are affiliated with St. Michael’s Hospital, Mental Health Service, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Halman is also affiliated with St. Michael’s Hospital, Centre for Research in Inner City Health, and St. Michael’s Hospital, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Address correspondence to Dr. Maggi, Room 17-033, Cardinal Carter Wing, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8; [email protected].

References

1.
Bowden CL, Brugger AM, Swann AC, et al: Efficacy of divalproex vs lithium and placebo in the treatment of mania. JAMA 1994; 271:918–924. Erratum in: JAMA 1994; 271:1830
2.
Keck PEJ, McElroy SL, Nemeroff CB: Anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar disorder. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 4:395–405
3.
Moog C, Kuntz-Simon G, Caussin-Schwemling C, et al: Sodium valproate, an anticonvulsant drug, stimulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication independent of glutathioine levels. J Gen Virol 1996; 77:1993–1999
4.
Simon G, Moog C, Obert G: Valproic acid reduces the intracellular level of glutathione and stimulates human immunodeficiency virus. Chem Biol Interact 1994; 91:111–121
5.
Withrouw M, Schmit JC, Van Remoortel B, et al: Cell type-dependent effect of sodium valproate on human immunodeficiency virus type-1 replication in vitro. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1997; 13:187–192
6.
Jefferson JW: Possible risks associated with valproate treatment of AIDS-related mania [letter]. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59:317
7.
Jennings HR, Romanelli F: The use of valproic acid in HIV-positive patients. Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33:1113–1116
8.
Jennings HR, Romanelli F: Comment: potential risk of valproic acid therapy in patients who are HIV-positive. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34:1348–1349
9.
Hardy MA, Nardacci D: Does valproate pose a threat to human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients? J Clin Psychopharmacol 1999; 19:189–190
10.
Maggi JD, Halman MH: The effect of divalproex sodium on viral load: a retrospective review of HIV-positive patients with manic syndromes. Can J Psychiatry 2001; 46:359–362
11.
Lehrman G, Hogue IB, Palmer S, et al: Depletion of latent HIV-1 infection in vivo: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet 2005; 366:549–555
12.
Dybul M, Fauci AS, Bartlett JG, et al: Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Washington, DC, Department of Health and Human Services (US Department of Health and Human Services) and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2002. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5107a1.htm
13.
Altman EG, Dedeker DR, Janicak PG, et al: The Clinician Administered Rating Scale for Mania (CARS-M): development, reliability, and validity. Biol Psychiatry 1994; 36:124–134
14.
Beck AT, Steer RA: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. San Antonio, Psychological Corp, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993
15.
Chesney MA, Ickovics JR, Chambers DB, et al: Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG adherence instruments: Patient Care Committee and Adherence Working Group of the Outcomes Committee of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG). AIDS Care 2000; 12:255–266
16.
Erbeding E, Quinn TC: The clinical utility of viral load monitoring in HIV infection: strengths and limitations. Genitourin Med 1996; 72:393–395
17.
Nakimuli-Mpungu E, Musisi S, Mpungu S, et al: Primary mania versus secondary mania in Uganda. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:1349–1354

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Go to The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Pages: 326 - 330
PubMed: 17827419

History

Published online: 1 July 2007
Published in print: Summer, 2007

Authors

Affiliations

Julie D. Maggi, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.(C.)
Mark H. Halman, M.D., F.R.C.P.(C.)

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format
Citation style
Style
Copy to clipboard

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

PPV Articles - Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share