THE RESEARCH TEAM CONCEPT AND THE CULTURAL PATTERN OF SCIENCE

JOHN H. ROHRERAuthors Info & Affiliations

Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry

Volume 109, Number 9

https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.109.9.677

Get Access

Abstract

1. The most important cultural influence affecting research methods used to study human social behavior is the cultural pattern labeled science.

2. One essential aspect of this culture pattern called science is theory. Failure to keep explicit the theoretical framework within which one works makes more probable the development of distorted perceptions and resulting erroneous beliefs as to the nature of the scientific description being attempted.

3. There are several distinctive, but equally valid, levels at which scientific descriptions can be made. The "truth" of statements, made at any of these descriptive levels, is given solely by the accuracy and consistency with which they describe the phenomena under question.

4. The problem of understanding the relations holding between variables under study is complicated when these distinctive levels, as such, are not recognized.

5. Successful attempts to interrelate the findings made at various scientific descriptive levels are dependent upon the use of coordinating definitions between levels. This fact is most important since its recognition may eliminate many of the misunderstandings and complications in communicating between the members of the various disciplines represented.

6. Variables that are independent and manipulated at one level may become, when introduced at another level, dependent variables. In a discussion between members of various disciplines, each should make explicit the status of the variables at their level of description and the coordinating definitions that relate their variables to variables at other levels of descriptions if they are to achieve effective communication between workers in the various disciplines.

7. The primary interaction task of the research team is to work out multidisciplinary coordinating definitions that provide explicit ways of integrating the knowledge obtained at different descriptive levels for purposes of describing human behavior more completely.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Get Access

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

American Journal of Psychiatry

Volume 109 • Number 9 • March 1953

Pages: 677 - 683

PubMed: 13030833

History

Published in print: March 1953

Published online: 1 April 2006

Authors

Details

JOHN H. ROHRER

Director, Urban Life Research Institute, and Professor of Psychology, Tulane University.

View all articles by this author

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Format	RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks
Direct importt
Citation style
Style

Copy to clipboard
Tips for downloading citations

View Options

Login options

Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.

Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens login

Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

PPV Articles - American Journal of Psychiatry

Not a subscriber?

Subscribe Now / Learn More

PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR^® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.

Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).

THE RESEARCH TEAM CONCEPT AND THE CULTURAL PATTERN OF SCIENCE

Abstract

Get full access to this article