Site of Opioid Action in the Human Brain: Mu and Kappa Agonists' Subjective and Cerebral Blood Flow Effects
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Humans experience the subjective effects of mu and kappa opioid agonists differently: mu agonists produce mainly euphoria, while kappa agonists are more likely to produce dysphoria. This study tested the hypothesis that these subjective effects would be associated with anatomically distinct changes in regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) relative to baseline as assessed with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHOD: Nine nondependent opioid abusers participated in the study. In the first phase of the study, the participants were acclimated to effects of the study drugs. In the second phase they underwent repeat challenges with the study drugs followed by an assessment of CBF with use of the SPECT tracer [99mTc]HMPAO. Medications tested were the prototypic mu agonist hydromorphone, the mixed agonist/antagonist butorphanol (which has a kappa agonist component of activity), and saline placebo. RESULTS: Subjective effects of the drugs were distinctly different. Hydromorphone produced increased ratings of “good effects,” while butorphanol led to more “bad effects.” Hydromorphone significantly increased regional CBF in the anterior cingulate cortex, both amygdalae, and the thalamus—all structures belonging to the limbic system. Butorphanol caused a less distinct picture of regional CBF increases, mainly in the area of both temporal lobes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that opioids with different subjective effects also produce statistically significant patterns of change in regional CBF from baseline, and the regions of statistical significance appear in different brain regions. In addition, these results demonstrate the applicability of SPECT functional neuroimaging in the study of medications with potential abuse liability.
Convergent evidence from behavioral, physiological, and neuroanatomical approaches suggests that effects of opioid drugs are mediated by different receptor subtypes, a concept initially proposed by Martin (1, 2). Among the diversity of opioid receptors described, mu and kappa receptors seem to be of particular relevance for human behavior. Morphine acts upon mu receptors as a typical agonist and produces effects such as analgesia, euphoria, respiratory depression, and miosis. Ketocyclazocine acts upon kappa receptors as an agonist, producing spinal analgesia, sedation, and miosis (3). The localization of opioid receptors in specific brain areas led logically to the discovery of a series of endogenous substances—the endorphins and the enkephalins—that appear to be responsible for the regulation of pain perception. More recently, these endogenous substances have been hypothesized to be important in the regulation of normal mood states and the mediation of the action of abused substances other than the opioids, such as cocaine (4–6).
Most of these observations of opioid effects were conducted with the use of animal models; the differential behavioral effects of opioids in humans have been less extensively studied. Research on humans in which a drug discrimination model was used has demonstrated that the opioid mixed agonist/antagonist butorphanol produces kappa-like effects, while hydromorphone produces primarily mu-like effects (7). Consistent with this differential discrimination of hydromorphone and butorphanol, these drugs also produce distinct and different patterns of subjective effects (8).
The implication of these differential effects is that corresponding changes in CNS function should also be distinguishable. We assessed behavioral and physiological effects of butorphanol and hydromorphone and tested the hypothesis that these opioids would produce both different behavioral profiles and different patterns of regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) in comparison with placebo, as assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
METHOD
Nine nondependent opioid-abusing volunteers participated. The inclusion criteria were a more than 2-year history of opioid abuse, absence of dependence symptoms, and absence of any concomitant somatic or psychiatric disorders, as assessed by internist examination and psychiatric interview. Furthermore, absence of any structural abnormalities of the brain, as assessed by subsequent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, was required. Written informed consent was obtained, and the protocol was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards for human research.
In phase 1 of the study, behavioral and physiological effects were assessed. The subjects were admitted to the Residential Research Facility at the Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit of the Johns Hopkins University Bayview Medical Center and underwent six experimental sessions. Following one training session (with saline placebo), five drug conditions were tested: placebo; hydromorphone, 2 and 4 mg/70 kg; and butorphanol, 3 and 6 mg/70 kg. The drugs were injected intramuscularly in random order and in double-blind fashion. The psychophysiological data recorded included respiration rate, skin temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, and pupil diameter. Subjective responses were assessed with adjective checklists and global analog ratings of the magnitude and quality of the drug effects. Clinicians made ratings on the Addiction Research Center Inventory LSD scale, a measure of dysphoric effects. These measures have been shown previously to be sensitive and reliable indicators of acute opioid effects (8–10).
In phase 2, effects on regional CBF were assessed. After phase 1, the subjects were transferred under supervision to the Inpatient Clinical Research Center of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, where they remained for 5 days. On days 1, 3, and 5, they received, in a double-blind, random-order design, intramuscular injections of 4 mg/70 kg of hydromorphone, 6 mg/70 kg of butorphanol, or saline placebo. Studies were performed every other day to minimize effects of the radioactive tracer from the previous study remaining bound to brain tissue (11). Fifty minutes after the injection of the study drug, the subjects were blindfolded and their ears were covered with a silencer to minimize auditory and visual stimulation.
At baseline and 15, 30, and 45 minutes after injection of the study drug (or placebo), subjective effects of the drugs were assessed with the same instruments as in phase 1. Sixty minutes after study drug injection, approximately 20 mCi of the SPECT blood flow tracer [99mTc]HMPAO (hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime) was injected intravenously. SPECT scans were performed with a triple-head (TRIONIX TRIAD) gamma camera 30–60 minutes after [99mTc]~HMPAO administration. Each SPECT scan was individually examined for possible artifacts and overall image quality. Image data were analyzed by means of the statistical parametric mapping program SPM 94 (12–14). Significant differences in regional CBF between the placebo and hydromorphone conditions and between the placebo and butorphanol conditions were calculated by averaging subjects' images for each condition after correction for the injected dose of radioactivity. The exact location of the voxels with the most significant differences was found with use of the brain atlas of Talairach and Tournoux (15).
The significance levels cited for the above-mentioned statistical parametric mapping analysis are corrected for the problem of multiple dependent comparisons (as with the Bonferroni method) by a statistical technique based on Gaussian random field theory (16). Roughly speaking, the statistical parametric mapping test statistic is the peak height of a contiguous set of voxels exceeding a given threshold (17, 18). Intuitively, this may be understood as a sophisticated and more powerful alternative to a naive Bonferroni correction.
RESULTS
Phase 1: subjective effects. The subjects reported different patterns of response in the hydromorphone and butorphanol conditions. The results for three measures are shown in figure 1. The two medications produced comparable pupillary constriction. However, butorphanol produced significant increases in subjects' responses on visual analog scale ratings of “bad effects” at both the 3-mg dose (t=2.07, df=8, p<0.05) and the 6-mg dose (t=2.11, df=8, p<0.05). Similarly, butorphanol at the 6-mg dose produced significant increases in observers' ratings on the Addiction Research Center Inventory LSD scale (t=4.00, df=8, p<0.01). Hydromorphone did not produce significant effects on either of these measures.
Phase 2: effects on CBF. None of the 27 SPECT scans had to be excluded from the analysis because of artifacts or problems with image quality. The statistical parametric mapping analysis revealed distinct, significant regional CBF increases in the hydromorphone condition as compared with the placebo condition. According to the Talairach-Tournoux atlas, these increases were located in the anterior cingulate cortex, the thalamus, and both amygdalae (figure 2). Butorphanol produced a more diffuse pattern of increases in regional CBF, with the strongest activations located in the anterior part of both temporal lobes (figure 3). In both drug conditions the CBF increases were slightly more prominent in the left hemisphere.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study suggest that opioids known to act on different opioid receptor subtypes and to have different patterns of subjective and behavioral effects also produce different patterns of change in regional CBF relative to baseline. We demonstrated increases in regional CBF in the anterior cingulate cortex, the thalamus, and the amygdalae induced by the mu opioid receptor agonist hydromorphone. Butorphanol, which has kappa-like actions, led to more diffuse regional CBF increases relative to baseline, primarily in the temporal lobes. One explanation for the less distinct effects of butorphanol could be its mixed agonist/antagonist properties. The opioid agonist ketazocine would have been a better choice in this study because of its preferential binding to kappa receptors (19).
In light of the clinical significance of opioid agonist drugs, surprisingly few studies have been undertaken that apply functional neuroimaging methods to assess regional CBF changes associated with behavioral effects of these substances. With the use of serial [15O]water positron emission tomography (PET) scans in a pain patient, and the same statistical parametric mapping analysis used in the present study, it was found that morphine induced regional CBF increases in the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex (20). Another study, using C15O2 PET and the statistical parametric mapping method, reported regional CBF increases in the anterior cingulate cortex and the pericentral cortex induced by administration of the opioid fentanyl (21). A preliminary SPECT study examining the effects of naltrexone-precipitated opioid withdrawal demonstrated decreases in blood flow in the region of the anterior cingulate of 11 patients maintained on a regimen of buprenorphine; these decreases were strongly correlated with severity of withdrawal symptoms (22). This last result is particularly interesting, since opioid withdrawal produced an effect on regional CBF that was the opposite of the present study's finding of increases in regional CBF with administration of a mu opioid agonist.
The anterior cingulate cortex is part of the functional circuit of the limbic system and is thought to be involved in the attribution of emotional significance to sensory stimuli (23). Two other key elements of the limbic system, the thalamus and both amygdalae, showed significant regional CBF increases on statistical parametric mapping analyses in response to the mu opioid agonist hydromorphone. This pattern correlates well with the distribution of mu receptors identified in postmortem pathology studies of human brains (24, 25). In these studies, high concentrations of mu receptors have been found in the cingulate gyrus, ventral tegmental area, cerebellum, thalamus, and hypothalamus, while kappa receptors have been concentrated in the substantia nigra, parts of the cortex, the amygdala, and also the hypothalamus and cingulate gyrus. Given the limited resolution (6 mm) of the SPECT method, we cannot expect to detect changes in CBF in the smaller of the regions mentioned.
There are important implications of this type of research for substance abuse and pain research. Functional neuroimaging provides a means for assessing the regional changes in CBF associated with drugs of abuse and offers the opportunity to study noninvasively the biological correlates of the reinforcing effects of drugs. Furthermore, CBF effects of novel analgesics can be compared with those of known analgesics. This can provide important information about the locus of activity of analgesics with differing mechanisms of action. Comparisons of the loci of activity associated with euphoric versus analgesic effects may be valuable in aiding the development of analgesics with low liability for abuse.
FIGURE 1. Physiological, Subjective, and Objective Effects of Butorphanol and Hydromorphone in Nine Nondependent Opioid Abusersa
aThe two medications produced comparable pupillary constriction (left panel). Butorphanol produced significant increases in subjects' ratings on a visual analog scale of “bad effects” (middle panel). Butorphanol produced significant increases in observers' ratings on a measure of dysphoric effects (right panel).
FIGURE 2. Statistical Parametric Map of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Increases 1 Hour After Intramuscular Administration of 4 mg/70 kg of Hydromorphone, a Prototypical Mu Opioid Receptor Agonista
a[99mTc]HMPAO SPECT images of nine subjects were averaged and compared with images obtained in the saline placebo condition. The map shows significant differences at the p<0.05 cutoff level, with green representing the lowest statistical significance (z=2.32) and red the highest (z=3.36) in three projections. R=right side.
FIGURE 3. Statistical Parametric Map of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Increases 1 Hour After Intramuscular Administration of 6 mg/70 kg of Butorphanol, a Mixed Opioid Receptor Agonist/Antagonist With a Kappa Component of Activitya
a[99mTc]HMPAO SPECT images of nine subjects were averaged and compared with images obtained in the saline placebo condition. The map shows significant differences at the p<0.05 cutoff level, with green representing the lowest statistical significance (z=2.32) and red the highest (z=2.91) in three projections. Butorphanol, compared to hydromorphone, produced a more diffuse pattern of increases in regional CBF, with the strongest activations located in the anterior part of both temporal lobes. R=right side.
Footnote
Presented in part at the 148th annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Miami, May 20–25, 1995. Received Aug. 27, 1996; revisions received July 11 and Sept. 30, 1997; accepted Oct. 13, 1997. From the Psychiatric Neuroimaging Group, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Bern; the Division of Psychiatric Neuroimaging and the Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; the Laboratory of Clinical Science, NIMH, Bethesda, Md.; and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore. Address reprint requests to Dr. Schlaepfer, Psychiatric Neuroimaging Group, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Murtenstrasse 21, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected]. (e-mail). Supported by grants 81BE-33483, 3231-044523.95, and 32-47130.96 from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Dr. Schlaepfer); the Francis Scott Key Medical Center (Dr. Strain); and the Johns Hopkins Hospital Inpatient Clinical Research Center (NIH grant RR-00035) (Dr. Pearlson and Dr. Schlaepfer).
References
1.
Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, Huppler RE, Gilbert PE: The effects of morphine- and nalorphine-like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1976; 197:517–532
2.
Martin WR: Pharmacology of opioids. Pharmacol Rev 1984; 35:283–323
3.
Jaffe JH, Martin WR: Opioid analgesics and antagonists, in Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th ed. Edited by Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F. New York, MacMillan, 1985, pp 491–531
4.
Unterwald EM, Horne-King J, Kreek MJ: Chronic cocaine alters brain mu opioid receptors. Brain Res 1992; 584:314–318
5.
Spealman RD, Bergman J: Modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine by mu and kappa opioids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 261:607–615
6.
Kornetsky C, Porrino LJ: Brain mechanisms of drug-induced reinforcement. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 1992; 70:59–77
7.
Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Bickel WK, Liebson IA: Drug discrimination in human postaddicts: agonist-antagonist opioids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1989; 250:184–196
8.
Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE: Discrimination of agonist-antagonist opioids in humans trained on a two-choice saline-hydromorphone discrimination. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 261:62–71
9.
Oliveto AH, Bickel WK, Kamien JB, Hughes JR, Higgins ST: Effects of diazepam and hydromorphone in triazolam-trained humans under a novel-response drug discrimination procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994; 114:417–423
10.
Strain EC, Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE: Precipitated withdrawal by pentazocine in methadone-maintained volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 267:624–634
11.
Schlaepfer TE, Pearlson GD: Pitfalls in SPECT studies of acute ethanol-induced changes in cerebral blood flow (letter). Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1695–1696
12.
Friston KJ, Passingham RE, Nutt JG, Heather JD, Sawle GV, Frackowiak RS: Localisation in PET images: direct fitting of the intercommissural (AC-PC) line. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1989; 9:690–695
13.
Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS: Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11:690–699
14.
Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Dolan RJ, Lammertsma AA, Frackowiak RS: The relationship between global and local changes in PET scans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1990; 10:458–466
15.
Talairach J, Tournoux P: Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, Thieme Medical, 1988
16.
Adler RJ: The Geometry of Random Fields. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1981
17.
Friston K, Holmes A, Worsley K, Poline J, Frith C, Frackowiak R: Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping 1995; 2:189–210
18.
Worsley KJ, Evans AC, Marrett S, Neelin P: A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992; 12:900–918
19.
Vonvoigtlander P, Lahti R, Ludens J: U-50,488: a selective and structurally novel non-mu (kappa) opioid agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 224:7–12
20.
Jones AK, Friston KJ, Qi LY, Harris M, Cunningham VJ, Jones T, Feinman C, Frackowiak RS: Sites of action of morphine in the brain (letter). Lancet 1991; 338:825
21.
Adler L, Firestone L, Winter P, Mintun M: Elucidation of central mechanisms of opioid analgesia by positron emission tomography (abstract). J Nucl Med 1994; 198P
22.
van Dyck CH, Rosen MI, Thomas HM, McMahon TJ, Wallace EA, O'Connor PG, Sullivan M, Krystal JH, Hoffer PB, Woods SW, Kosten TR: SPECT regional cerebral blood-flow alterations in naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal from buprenorphine. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging 1994; 55:181–191
23.
Gabriel M, Orona E, Foster K, Lambert R: Mechanisms and generality of stimulus significance coding in a mammalian model system. Advances in Behavioral Biology 1982; 26:535–567
24.
Maurer R, Cortes R, Probst A, Palacios JM: Multiple opiate receptor in human brain: an autoradiographic investigation. Life Sci 1983; 33(suppl 1):231–234
25.
Pfeiffer A, Pasi A, Mehraein P, Herz A: Opiate receptor binding sites in human brain. Brain Res 1982; 248:87–96
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: 1 April 1998
Published in print: April 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).