The Intergenerational Transmission of Anxiety: A Children-of-Twins Study
Publication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective:
The transmission of anxiety within families is well recognized, but the underlying processes are poorly understood. Twin studies of adolescent anxiety demonstrate both genetic and environmental influence, and multiple aspects of parenting are associated with offspring anxiety. To date, the children-of-twins design has not been used to evaluate the relative contributions of genetic transmission compared with direct transmission of anxiety from parents to their offspring.
Method:
Anxiety and neuroticism measures were completed by 385 monozygotic and 486 dizygotic same-sex twin families (37% male twin pair families) from the Twin and Offspring Study in Sweden. Structural equation models tested for the presence of both genetic and environmental transmission from one generation to the next.
Results:
For both anxiety and neuroticism, the models provide support for significant direct environmental transmission from parents to their adolescent offspring. In contrast, there was no evidence of significant genetic transmission.
Conclusions:
The association between parental and offspring anxiety largely arises because of a direct association between parents and their children independent of genetic confounds. The lack of genetic transmission may reflect there being different genetic effects on these traits in adolescence and adulthood. Direct environmental transmission is in line with developmental theories of anxiety suggesting that children and adolescents learn anxious behaviors from their parents through a number of pathways such as modeling. Future analyses should combine children-of-twins data with child twin data in order to examine whether this direct effect solely represents parental influences on the offspring or whether it also includes child/adolescent anxiety evoking parental anxiety.
Anxiety disorders are the most common group of disorders, with a lifetime prevalence of about 30% (1). They are associated with a wide array of personal, financial, and societal costs (2), making research into their etiology a priority. A notable feature of anxiety disorders is that they start early in life, with a mean age at onset of 11 years (1). It is therefore crucial to understand the development of anxiety symptoms in young people.
One of the most robust features of anxiety disorders is that they run in families (3). This association has been widely explored, and there is evidence for a number of contributing mechanisms. First, children and adolescents can develop symptoms of anxiety by vicarious learning, whereby offspring watching anxious behaviors in their parents then model these behaviors themselves (4). Second, anxious mothers may have a more anxious parenting style, including holding more negative expectations and showing greater intrusiveness, overprotection, and expressed anxiety (5, 6), although it should be noted that most studies that have found this association focused on families in which the child also had an anxiety disorder or heightened anxiety symptoms. Third, as well as parents influencing their offspring, there is evidence for the reverse effect. Specifically, studies have found that parents of offspring with anxiety disorders show higher levels of parental overprotection and rejection and lower levels of emotional warmth (7, 8). However, these studies do not take into account another possibility, whereby genes that affect parent anxiety and child/adolescent anxiety also influence parenting, thus leading to a confounding of genetic and environmental influences.
Twin studies consistently reveal mild to moderate genetic influences on a wide range of child and adolescent anxiety measures, including trait anxiety (9), disorder-related symptoms assessed by self-report (10) and parent-report (11), and anxiety disorders (12, 13). Similarly, studies of adults reveal mild to moderate genetic influences on trait anxiety (14), anxiety symptoms (15), and anxiety disorders (16). This suggests that the transmission of anxiety phenotypes from parents to their children could be explained, at least partially, by genetic influences. It is noteworthy that there is considerable genetic overlap across symptoms reflecting different anxiety diagnoses (such as separation anxiety, social anxiety, and general anxiety) in child (17, 18), adolescent (10), and adult (10, 19) samples. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have found evidence for substantial heterotypic continuity within the anxiety disorders (i.e., continuity of anxiety over time does not sit within diagnostic boundaries [20]). Thus, a child who presents with separation anxiety may develop generalized anxiety in adolescence and panic disorder in adulthood. This heterotypic continuity, combined with the genetic overlap found between different types of anxiety measures, suggests that for examination of transmission of anxiety one should use a broad measure of anxiety symptomatology reflecting general vulnerability to anxiety disorders.
In addition to providing evidence for genetic influences, twin studies also provide support for a significant role of the shared environment (21), nongenetic influences that contribute to family members resembling one another, and the nonshared environment, that which leads to differences among family members. The contribution of shared environment to variation in anxiety is consistent with the evidence described above for the importance of family environment in the development of anxiety in children. For example, siblings may show similar levels of anxiety because they were both exposed to the same level of parental-expressed anxiety. In summary, there is evidence to support a role for both genetic and environmental influences on anxiety in adults and in children and adolescents; however, to our knowledge no study to date has explicitly tested the relative contribution of genetic and environmental influences to the transmission of anxiety within families. This is important because we might target interventions for pediatric anxiety differently if intergenerational transmission is largely a result of genes versus resulting from the family-wide environment.
Although pediatric twin studies are able to ascertain the proportion of variance in child/adolescent phenotypes due to genetic and environmental influences, they cannot specify the extent to which genes and the environment contribute to transmission from parents to their children. For this, other genetically sensitive designs are needed. The children-of-twins model is one such design and involves adult twin pairs and their offspring (22). By comparing correlations between children and their parent and contrasting this with correlations between children and their parent’s identical cotwin, we can learn about the influence of living with one’s parent over and above simply receiving 50% of their genes. Furthermore, by comparing the extent to which correlations between children and their twin uncle/aunt (avuncular correlations) differ for monozygotic and dizygotic twin families, we can infer the extent to which genetic and environmental factors influence transmission from one generation to another. Children share a greater level of genetic influence with their uncle/aunt when in monozygotic families than when in dizygotic families (see Figure 1). Thus, if children resemble their uncle/aunt to a greater extent in monozygotic families than in dizygotic families, this implies a genetic influence on transmission of the trait of interest. In contrast, if these two sets of correlations are similar, and are significantly lower than the parent-child correlations, this is indicative of an environmental mode of transmission. While transmission of both depression and internalizing symptoms within families has been found to be a result of environmental transmission independent of genetic effects (23–25), the transmission of anxiety-related traits within families has yet to be explored using the children-of-twins design.
FIGURE 1. Genetic Correlations Between Family Members in the Children-of-Twins Study Design for Both Monozygotic (MZ) and Dizygotic (DZ) Familiesa
a Section A represents MZ correlations, and Section B represents DZ correlations.
In the present study, we used the Children of Twins design to examine the relative contribution of genetic and environmental influences to transmission of broadly assessed anxiety from one generation to another. For this analysis, we used a measure of anxious personality in parents and a measure of anxiety symptoms in the offspring. For simplicity, from herein we use the word “anxiety” alone when referring to the transmission of parental anxious personality to offspring anxiety symptoms while specifying all other types of anxiety as applicable. As a comparison, we also repeated analyses for neuroticism, given that this personality trait shows strong phenotypic and genetic correlations with anxiety (26).
Method
Participants
Data were drawn from the Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden and comprised information on 387 monozygotic twin families and 489 dizygotic twin families. A twin family comprised a twin pair, each twin’s spouse, and one of each of their adolescent children. Only same-sex twin pairs were used, and twin offspring were selected so that cousins were the same sex as one another and did not differ in age by more than 4 years. Thirty-seven percent of twin pairs were male, and 52% of offspring were male. At the time of data collection, the mean age of offspring in the Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden sample was 15.7 years (SD=2.4; range 11–22). The mean age of twins in the sample was 44.8 years (SD=4.9; range 32–60), and for spouses the mean age was 45.5 years (SD=5.4; range=25–65). After complete description of the study was given, written informed consent was obtained. Further information on the Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden sample is provided elsewhere (27).
Measures
Parental anxious personality was self-reported by twins using 20 items from the Karolinska Scales of Personality (28, 29). Items were oriented toward either social (“I often feel uncertain when I meet people I don’t know very well”) or physical (“sometimes my heart beats hard or irregularly for no particular reason”) aspects of anxiety, in addition to general worry (“I often worry about little things which others see as unimportant”). Respondents used a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very) true. Item scores were summed to give an overall anxiety rating. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90.
Offspring anxiety symptoms were measured using items from the Child Behavior Checklist (30). Twins, their spouses, and offspring all reported on offspring behavior over the previous 6 months. A previous study aimed at developing DSM-oriented scales from Child Behavior Checklist items (31) was used to guide the selection of items included in our anxiety scale, and as with the parental anxiety symptoms, the focus was on items that reflect social (“clings to adults or too dependent”) and physical (“I’m nervous, high strung, or tense”) aspects of anxiety, as well as general worry (“I worry quite a lot”). Items were scored on a scale ranging from 0 (not) to 2 (very/often) true. Items from all three reporters (which correlated from 0.25 to 0.45) were summed to create an overall anxiety score to provide the broadest and most objective measure possible. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.73.
Neuroticism was self-reported for both twins and offspring using the neuroticism scale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (32). The scale comprised nine yes/no items (such as “are you often worried without knowing why?”) scored 1/0 for yes/no. Item scores were summed to give an overall neuroticism rating. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.72 for parents and 0.67 for offspring.
Analyses
Analyses on anxiety included 385 monozygotic twin families and 486 dizygotic twin families. However, the neuroticism measure was only included in the second cohort of the study, resulting in a reduced sample comprising 222 monozygotic families and 293 dizygotic families for the neuroticism analyses.
Genetic analyses were conducted in the structural equation modeling program OpenMx (33). Prior to analyses, residuals were taken to control for twin sex and age as is standard practice in twin analyses (34). All variables were log-transformed to correct for skew. We fitted structural equation models to the data using maximum likelihood estimation. Models allowed us to quantify the effects of additive genetic (A), common environmental (C; nongenetic effects that make members of a nuclear family similar to one another) and nonshared environmental (E; environmental effects that make members of a family different from one another) effects on parental anxiety. By comparing the magnitude of monozygotic twin correlations (attributable to the combined effects of A+C) to dizygotic twins (attributable to 0.5*A+C), genetic and environmental influences can be estimated. Comparing monozygotic and dizygotic avuncular correlations and parent-child correlations allows for the estimation of genetic and nongenetic intergenerational pathways. Comparing correlations between cousins from monozygotic families with those of dizygotic families allows for the estimation of the role of familial and nonshared environmental effects on offspring anxiety.
The model used is shown in Figures 2 and 3. It is noteworthy that the path from parent phenotype to offspring phenotype reflects the direct influence of a parent’s behavior on his or her offspring. Because this is manifested through the environment, we describe it as “environmental” transmission, but it should be noted that this pathway also reflects gene-environment correlation if there is genetic influence on the parent phenotype. Second, as in all children-of-twins models, there was no shared environment factor for the offspring part of the model, since this would result in there being too many paths for the data available. The significance of the environmental (from parent to offspring phenotype) and genetic (from A1′ to offspring phenotype) intergenerational pathways was tested by creating submodels in which they were fixed to zero. Both chi-square difference tests and Akaike’s information criterion were used to assess whether submodels were a significantly worse fit to the data than the full model. All analyses were repeated controlling for assortative mating, but results were substantively similar (see the online data supplement ).
FIGURE 2. Results From the Full Unconstrained Model for Anxietya
a The pathway between A1 and A1’ is fixed to 0.50 because parents and offspring share 50% of their genome.
FIGURE 3. Results From the Full Unconstrained Model for Neuroticisma
a The pathway between A1 and A1’ is fixed to 0.50 because parents and offspring share 50% of their genome.
Results
The correlation between the anxiety measures and neuroticism was 0.70 for parents and 0.42 for offspring. Correlations between twin parents and their offspring for both anxiety measures and neuroticism are summarized in Table 1. Several findings from this table are worth noting. First, there is evidence for genetic effects on both anxious personality and neuroticism in the parents, as indicated by the larger monozygotic correlations compared with dizygotic correlations (e.g., 0.55 compared with 0.20, respectively, for anxiety). Second, there is evidence for genetic influence on offspring anxiety symptoms and neuroticism given the larger correlations for cousins from monozygotic families compared with dizygotic families (e.g., 0.08 compared with −0.03, respectively, for anxiety). Third, there is marginal evidence for genetic effects on transmission of anxiety given the larger avuncular correlations (offspring 1–parent 2 and vice versa) for monozygotic families compared with dizygotic families (0.11 compared with 0.02, respectively). However, these values are both small, and for neuroticism, this pattern is not seen (0.03 compared with 0.07 for monozygotic and dizygotic families, respectively). Overall, these data do not suggest substantial genetic transmission of broadly assessed anxiety or neuroticism. Finally, there is modest evidence for environmental transmission of both anxiety and neuroticism, given the larger parent-offspring than avuncular correlations in both monozygotic and dizygotic families. For example, in monozygotic families, while the avuncular correlation for anxiety was 0.11, the parent-offspring correlation was 0.20.
| Symptom and Generation | Monozygotic Twin Families | Dizygotic Twin Families | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Parent 1 | Twin Parent 2 | Offspring 1 | Twin Parent 1 | Twin Parent 2 | Offspring 1 | |||||||
| Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | Intraclass Correlation | 95% CI | |
| Anxiety | ||||||||||||
| Twin parent 2 | 0.55 | 0.48 to 0.61 | 0.20 | 0.11 to 0.28 | ||||||||
| Offspring 1 | 0.20 | 0.16 to 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.04 to 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.16 to 0.25 | 0.02 | –0.05 to 0.08 | ||||
| Offspring 2 | 0.11 | 0.04 to 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.16 to 0.25 | 0.08 | –0.03 to 0.19 | 0.02 | –0.05 to 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.16 to 0.25 | –0.03 | –0.12 to 0.05 |
| Neuroticism | ||||||||||||
| Twin parent 2 | 0.36 | 0.25 to 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.15 to 0.36 | ||||||||
| Offspring 1 | 0.21 | 0.15 to 0.27 | 0.03 | –0.06 to 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.15 to 0.27 | 0.07 | –0.02 to 0.15 | ||||
| Offspring 2 | 0.03 | –0.06 to 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.15 to 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.01 to 0.29 | 0.07 | –0.02 to 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.15 to 0.27 | 0.03 | –0.09 to 0.15 |
a
Parent-child correlations constrained to be equal across zygosity types.
The fit indices from the model-fitting analyses for twin parents and their offspring for both anxiety and neuroticism are presented in Table 2. It is noteworthy that the power to detect genetic effects in the child part of the model was low, given that the genetic resemblance between cousins from monozygotic families compared with dizygotic families was 0.25 compared with 0.125. In both cases, the model restricted to environmental transmission only, from which the genetic transmission path was removed (model 3), provides a good fit to the data indicating that genetic transmission is not a significant contributor to overall model fit. In contrast, for both anxiety and neuroticism, the genetic transmission-only model, in which the environmental transmission path was dropped, provides a significantly poorer fit to the data providing support for the environmental transmission pathway. However, given the complexity of these models, we provide the results for the full model rather than the best-fitting model (Figures 2 and 3). Examination of the confidence intervals for the environmental transmission and genetic transmission paths for both anxiety and neuroticism revealed that the confidence interval for the environmental transmission pathway, going from parent to offspring, did not include zero. In contrast, in both cases, the genetic transmission path (from A1’ to offspring phenotype) did include zero.
| Model | Model Fit Measure | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| –2LL | Akaike Information Criteriona | df | χ2b | df | p | |
| Anxiety | ||||||
| Saturated | 9582.91 | 2704.91 | 3439 | |||
| Full model | 9610.65 | 2694.65 | 3458 | 27.74 | 19 | 0.09 |
| Direct transmission onlyc | 9611.16 | 2693.16 | 3459 | 0.51 | 1 | 0.47 |
| Genetic transmission only | 9625.15 | 2707.15 | 3459 | 14.5 | 1 | <0.001 |
| Neuroticism | ||||||
| Saturated | 5717.71 | 1649.71 | 2034 | |||
| Full model | 5741.33 | 1635.33 | 2053 | 23.62 | 19 | 0.21 |
| Direct transmission onlyc | 5742.06 | 1634.06 | 2054 | 0.73 | 1 | 0.39 |
| Genetic transmission only | 5756.44 | 1648.44 | 2054 | 15.12 | 1 | <0.001 |
a
The overall model fit is assessed by –2LL, which is minus twice the log likelihood.
b
The chi-square for model 2 each time is the difference in minus twice the log likelihood (–2LL) between the full genetic and the phenotypic saturated model; in contrast, the chi-square for models 3 and 4 is the difference in –2LL between each model and the full genetic model (model 2).
c
The best-fitting model.
Discussion
This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine the transmission of anxiety using a children-of-twin design. These analyses provide support for the direct, environmentally mediated transmission of anxiety from parents to their adolescent offspring over and above any genetic confounding of this association. It is noteworthy that the analyses do not provide support for genetic transmission being a significant influence, given the assumptions of our model that the same genetic factors influence both adolescent and adult anxiety. These two findings will be discussed in turn.
There are three potential interpretations of the environmental influence on the association between parent and offspring anxiety. The first is that parental anxiety itself results in a rearing environment that is conducive to the development of anxiety in young people. This could operate through a number of mechanisms. One is vicarious learning (4), whereby the young person learns to be fearful of certain environmental stimuli by observing the presence of that fear in his or her parent(s). For example, if an adolescent witnesses repeated examples of parental anxiety in response to ambiguous or only mildly threatening behavior, he or she will learn that the world is an unsafe place. Such learning can also take place through hearing explanations or interpretations of ambiguous or mildly negative experiences that emphasize the threat content of that experience, reflecting anxiety-related information processing on the part of the parent (35, 36). In both these instances, while there may be a genetic influence on the parent’s expressed anxiety (as seen in the models here), the way in which the anxiety is transmitted is through a direct environmental pathway between the parent’s behavior and the offspring. The second interpretation of this environmental pathway is that it reflects anxious parents engaging in negative parenting behaviors that promote anxiety in their offspring. However, although anxious parents have been shown to be more likely to display overcontrolling behavior (5, 37), and to be more negative and critical of their offspring (5), this is most commonly found in the context of the child/adolescent displaying high anxiety. This leads to the third interpretation, which is that anxiety in the offspring influences the parenting he or she receives. This is compatible with findings that parents of anxious children/adolescents display parenting behaviors that exacerbate the anxiety symptoms (8, 37). One study of anxious children found that associations between negative parenting behaviors and child-expressed anxiety during a task were far stronger for mothers who were also anxious compared with mothers who were not anxious (5). This suggests that there are likely to be effects in both directions. Whatever the mechanism, the present study is the first to demonstrate that the association between parent and child anxiety persists after accounting for genetic confounding.
The lack of evidence for genetic transmission of anxiety within families may at first appear surprising, given the heritability estimates found for both anxiety and neuroticism. However, it is consistent with other findings on internalizing problems, which have similarly shown evidence only for environmental transmission (23–25, 38). There are at least three possible explanations for this apparent lack of genetic transmission for anxiety-related phenotypes within families. The first relates to the assumptions of our model, that the same genes influence both adult and adolescent anxiety. At present, the twin literature is inconclusive on this issue. Two studies, one of mixed anxiety/depression (39) and the other of anxious cognitions (40), both across adolescence and into young adulthood, identified considerable continuity of genetic factors. In contrast, two studies of mixed anxiety/depression (41) and fears (42) from adolescence into young adulthood found only modest stability with considerable genetic innovation. Thus, it remains unclear the extent to which the same genes affect both adolescent and adult anxiety-related phenotypes. Given this, it is plausible that while parental anxiety is genetically influenced, these genes are different from those relevant to the development of adolescent anxiety. Testing this hypothesis would require children-of-twins data on which we had measures from adolescence on the adult parent twins. Currently, no such data set exists, although the number of longitudinal child twin studies in which the children are entering young adulthood is encouraging from this perspective (43, 44). Second, it is also possible that the heritability estimate for anxiety phenotypes obtained from child/adolescent twin studies includes interactions between genetic factors and the shared environment. Such interactions in a traditional twin design would be included in the heritability estimate (45), but in the children-of-twins design we use this would not be the case because the effects of the shared environment cannot be estimated in the offspring generation. Given that shared environment is found to be significant more often in child anxiety phenotypes than in other types of psychopathology, this is another plausible explanation. Third, it is possible that measurement error reduced the paths between the generations thus reducing our ability to detect genetic transmission. However, the study used relatively standard questionnaire measures for which there is at least adequate reliability.
This study has a number of notable strengths. It is the first children-of-twins analysis of transmission of anxiety from parents to their adolescent offspring. It uses a relatively large data set that provides good statistical power. Finally, we provide an internal replication by considering neuroticism in addition to anxiety. However, there are a number of limitations. First, while the study was fairly large, one always achieves greater power with larger samples. As shown in Table 1, there was a modest difference between the avuncular correlations for anxiety from monozygotic families compared with dizygotic families (0.11 and 0.02, respectively), which suggests modest genetic influence, that may have proved significant with a larger sample. For neuroticism, there was no indication of genetic transmission, even in the correlational data. Second, although these findings provide support for direct transmission, the use of cross-sectional data means that they do not indicate the direction of effect. Finally, it is possible that parents with higher levels of anxiety over-reported anxiety in their offspring, resulting in a bias in parent-offspring correlations at the upper end of the distribution. However, mean levels of anxiety do not differ across our monozygotic families compared with our dizygotic families, and thus any bias associated with higher anxiety should not affect our estimates of genetic and environmental influences or the direct transmission pathway.
In summary, the association between parental and offspring anxiety remains after accounting for genetic transmission. These results are consistent with a direct, environmentally mediated effect of parent anxiety on offspring anxiety or could reflect anxious adolescents eliciting anxiety in their parent. Longitudinal analyses using an extended children-of-twins design will be useful in exploring these questions further.
Supplementary Material
File (appi.ajp.2015.14070818.ds001.pdf)
- View/Download
- 97.78 KB
References
1.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:593–602
2.
Almond S, Healey A: Mental health and absence from work: new evidence from the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey. Work Employ Soc 2003; 17:731–742
3.
Eley TC, Collier D, McGuffin P, et al: Anxiety and eating disorders, in Psychiatric Genetics and Genomics. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp 303–340
4.
Askew C, Field AP: The vicarious learning pathway to fear 40 years on. Clin Psychol Rev 2008; 28:1249–1265
5.
Creswell C, Apetroaia A, Murray L, et al: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral characteristics of mothers with anxiety disorders in the context of child anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2013; 122:26–38
6.
Creswell C, Murray L, Cooper PJ, et al: Intergenerational Transmission of Anxious Information Processing Biases, Information Processing Biases and Anxiety: A Developmental Perspective. London, Wiley Blackwell Ltd, 2011
7.
Knappe S, Lieb R, Beesdo K, et al: The role of parental psychopathology and family environment for social phobia in the first three decades of life. Depress Anxiety 2009; 26:363–370
8.
Hale WW 3rd, Klimstra TA, Branje SJT, et al: Is adolescent generalized anxiety disorder a magnet for negative parental interpersonal behaviors? Depress Anxiety 2013; 30:849–856
9.
Lau JYF, Eley TC, Stevenson J: Examining the state-trait anxiety relationship: a behavioural genetic approach. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2006; 34:19–27
10.
Waszczuk MA, Zavos HMS, Gregory AM, et al: The phenotypic and genetic structure of depression and anxiety disorder symptoms in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:905–916
11.
Thapar A, McGuffin P: Are anxiety symptoms in childhood heritable? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1995; 36:439–447
12.
Bolton D, Eley TC, O’Connor TG, et al: Prevalence and genetic and environmental influences on anxiety disorders in 6-year-old twins. Psychol Med 2006; 36:335–344
13.
Scaini S, Ogliari A, Eley TC, et al: Genetic and environmental contributions to separation anxiety: a meta-analytic approach to twin data. Depress Anxiety 2012; 29:754–761
14.
Sung J, Lee K, Song YM, et al: Relationships between State and Trait Anxiety Inventory and alcohol use disorder identification test scores among Korean twins and families: the Healthy Twin Study. Twin Res Hum Genet 2011; 14:73–78
15.
Kendler KS, Heath A, Martin NG, et al: Symptoms of anxiety and depression in a volunteer twin population: the etiologic role of genetic and environmental factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43:213–221
16.
Hettema JM, Neale MC, Kendler KS: A review and meta-analysis of the genetic epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:1568–1578
17.
Eley TC, Rijsdijk FV, Perrin S, et al: A multivariate genetic analysis of specific phobia, separation anxiety and social phobia in early childhood. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2008; 36:839–848
18.
Hallett V, Ronald A, Rijsdijk F, et al: Phenotypic and genetic differentiation of anxiety-related behaviors in middle childhood. Depress Anxiety 2009; 26:316–324
19.
Hettema JM, Prescott CA, Myers JM, et al: The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for anxiety disorders in men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:182–189
20.
Gregory AM, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, et al: Juvenile mental health histories of adults with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:301–308
21.
Gregory AM, Eley TC: The genetic basis of child and adolescent anxiety, in Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents, 2nd ed. Edited by Silverman WK, Field AP. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp 161–178
22.
McAdams TA, Neiderhiser JM, Rijsdijk FV, et al: Accounting for genetic and environmental confounds in associations between parent and child characteristics: a systematic review of children-of-twins studies. Psychol Bull 2014; 140:1138–1173
23.
Silberg JL, Maes H, Eaves LJ: Genetic and environmental influences on the transmission of parental depression to children’s depression and conduct disturbance: an extended children of twins study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010; 51:734–744
24.
Singh AL, D’Onofrio BM, Slutske WS, et al: Parental depression and offspring psychopathology: a children of twins study. Psychol Med 2011; 41:1385–1395
25.
McAdams TA, Rijsdijk FV, Neiderhiser JM, et al:. The relationship between parental depressive symptoms and offspring psychopathology: evidence from a children-of-twins study and an adoption study. Psychol Med (in press)
26.
Hettema JM, Neale MC, Myers JM, et al: A population-based twin study of the relationship between neuroticism and internalizing disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:857–864
27.
Neiderhiser JM, Lichtenstein P: The Twin and Offspring Study in Sweden: advancing our understanding of genotype-environment interplay by studying twins and their families. Acta Psychol Sin 2008
28.
Schalling D, Edman G (eds): The Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP) Manual: An Inventory for Assessing Temperament Dimensions Associated with Vulnerability for Psychosocial Deviance. Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, 1993
29.
Weinryb RM, Gustavsson JP, Asberg M, et al: Stability over time of character assessment using a psychodynamic instrument and personality inventories. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992; 86:179–184
30.
Achenbach TM, Edelbrock C: Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist and Revised Child Behaviour Profile. Burlington, Vt, University of Vermont, 1983
31.
Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA: DSM-oriented and empirically based approaches to constructing scales from the same item pools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2003; 32:328–340
32.
Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG: Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1975
33.
Boker S, Neale M, Maes H, et al: OpenMx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 2011; 76:306–317
34.
McGue M, Bouchard TJ Jr: Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 1984; 14:325–343
35.
Aktar E, Majdandžić M, de Vente W, et al: The interplay between expressed parental anxiety and infant behavioural inhibition predicts infant avoidance in a social referencing paradigm. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:144–156
36.
Creswell C, Shildrick S, Field AP: Interpretation of ambiguity in children: a prospective study of associations with anxiety and parental interpretations. J Child Fam Stud 2011; 20:240–250
37.
Eley TC, Napolitano M, Lau JYF, et al: Does childhood anxiety evoke maternal control? a genetically informed study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010; 51:772–779
38.
Narusyte J, Neiderhiser JM, D’Onofrio BM, et al: Testing different types of genotype-environment correlation: an extended children-of-twins model. Dev Psychol 2008; 44:1591–1603
39.
Fenzel LM: Role strains and the transition to middle school: longitudinal trends and sex differences. J Early Adolesc 1989; 9:211–226
40.
Zavos HMS, Gregory AM, Eley TC: Longitudinal genetic analysis of anxiety sensitivity. Dev Psychol 2012; 48:204–212
41.
Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Lichtenstein P: A developmental twin study of symptoms of anxiety and depression: evidence for genetic innovation and attenuation. Psychol Med 2008; 38:1567–1575
42.
Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Annas P, et al: A longitudinal twin study of fears from middle childhood to early adulthood: evidence for a developmentally dynamic genome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:421–429
43.
Haworth CMA, Davis OSP, Plomin R. Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): a genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2013; 16:117–125
44.
Lichtenstein P, Tuvblad C, Larsson H, et al: The Swedish Twin study of Child and Adolescent Development: the TCHAD-study. Twin Res Hum Genet 2007; 10:67–73
45.
Rijsdijk FV, Sham PC: Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models. Brief Bioinform 2002; 3:119–133
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 2 July 2014
Revision received: 23 October 2014
Revision received: 25 November 2014
Revision received: 18 December 2014
Accepted: 13 January 2015
Published online: 23 April 2015
Published in print: July 01, 2015
Authors
Author Contributions
Drs. Eley and McAdams contributed equally to the work.
Competing Interests
The authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
Leverhulme Trust10.13039/501100000275: RPG-210
National Institute of Mental Health10.13039/100000025: R01MH54610
Supported by the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-210, principal investigator, Thalia Eley, Ph.D.). The Twin and Offspring Study in Sweden was supported by grant R01MH54610 from NIMH.This study presents independent research part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
View Options
View options
PDF/EPUB
View PDF/EPUBGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).