The Risk of Treatment-Emergent Mania With Methylphenidate in Bipolar Disorder
This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTIONPublication: American Journal of Psychiatry
Abstract
Objective:
The authors sought to determine the risk of treatment-emergent mania associated with methylphenidate, used in monotherapy or with a concomitant mood-stabilizing medication, in patients with bipolar disorder.
Method:
Using linked Swedish national registries, the authors identified 2,307 adults with bipolar disorder who initiated therapy with methylphenidate between 2006 and 2014. The cohort was divided into two groups: those with and those without concomitant mood-stabilizing treatment. To adjust for individual-specific confounders, including disorder severity, genetic makeup, and early environmental factors, Cox regression analyses were used, conditioning on individual to compare the rate of mania (defined as hospitalization for mania or a new dispensation of stabilizing medication) 0–3 months and 3–6 months after medication start following nontreated periods.
Results:
Patients on methylphenidate monotherapy displayed an increased rate of manic episodes within 3 months of medication initiation (hazard ratio=6.7, 95% CI=2.0–22.4), with similar results for the subsequent 3 months. By contrast, for patients taking mood stabilizers, the risk of mania was lower after starting methylphenidate (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.4–0.9). Comparable results were observed when only hospitalizations for mania were counted.
Conclusions:
No evidence was found for a positive association between methylphenidate and treatment-emergent mania among patients with bipolar disorder who were concomitantly receiving a mood-stabilizing medication. This is clinically important given that up to 20% of people with bipolar disorder suffer from comorbid ADHD. Given the markedly increased hazard ratio of mania following methylphenidate initiation in bipolar patients not taking mood stabilizers, careful assessment to rule out bipolar disorder is indicated before initiating monotherapy with psychostimulants.
Bipolar disorder, a mood disorder with an estimated prevalence of 2.4% (1), is characterized by episodes of mania (pathologically elevated mood) and depression (pathologically lowered mood) interspersed with euthymic (normal) mood (2, 3). Bipolar disorder has been ranked as the second leading cause of “days out of role” worldwide (4), exacting high societal costs because of lost productivity (5). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects 1%−5% of the population (6, 7) and is characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity—symptoms that may partially overlap with those of bipolar disorder (3, 8).
Bipolar disorder and ADHD commonly co-occur. Comorbid ADHD has been observed in up to 20% of people with bipolar disorder, and there is evidence that co-occurrence of these disorders is associated with a worse illness course than either disorder alone (4, 9–11). Research indicates that these disorders share common genetic etiologies (11), but comorbid ADHD in bipolar disorder could still represent co-occurrence of two distinct pathophysiologies. Studies have, for example, suggested that patients with bipolar disorder who also have a history of childhood ADHD may represent a distinct early-onset subtype with specific neurobiological underpinnings (9, 12).
In current practice guidelines, pharmacotherapy is a cornerstone of management for bipolar disorder and ADHD (3). The foundation of pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder often involves one or more medications classified as mood stabilizers, which can attenuate acute mood episodes and have a prophylactic effect against recurrent episodes and/or cycling. Although there is some debate about which medications should be classified as mood stabilizers, most experts agree that at least two medications—lithium salts and valproate—are indicated for both acute-phase therapy and prophylaxis of bipolar I disorder, and several second-generation antipsychotic drugs are increasingly used as mood stabilizers (13). The therapeutics of ADHD differ considerably, and most patients will at some point be treated with central stimulants, which are presumed to increase neuronal signaling by marked elevation of the extracellular concentration of neurotransmitters in the prefrontal cortex of the brain (14). The psychostimulant methylphenidate is one of the most widely used medications for ADHD in both the United States and the European Union, and its use in the treatment of adults with ADHD has increased in recent years (15, 16).
There is a high rate of nonresponse and residual functional impairment in comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder (17), and the pharmacological treatment of comorbid ADHD in bipolar disorder presents a challenge. Not only may the treatment for bipolar disorder worsen ADHD symptoms (18), clinicians have long worried that methylphenidate and other psychostimulants may also induce mania or even provoke psychosis (19–22). Some physicians even consider the use of psychostimulants to be contraindicated in bipolar disorder (18). An analogous debate has centered on the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder (for treatment of depressive episodes or co-occurring anxiety disorders) (19–23), although recent research indicates that this risk is reduced or eliminated by the use of a concomitant mood-stabilizing treatment (21, 23).
A recent review of studies concerning the efficacy and safety of psychostimulants in adults with comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder concluded that controlled studies and treatment guidelines were substantially lacking (18). Only a handful of randomized controlled trials have studied stimulant use in comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder (24–27), and all had small sample sizes and half of them focused on adolescents only (26, 27). Nonetheless, these studies suggest that stimulants are effective in treating ADHD symptoms in bipolar disorder and produce no adverse mood elevation when used together with a mood stabilizer. In addition, open-label studies and case series suggest that the response to stimulants in comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder appears to be similar to the response reported in adult ADHD (18). Even though this is encouraging, the risk of treatment-emergent mania when psychostimulants are used in bipolar disorder needs to be further evaluated, both in larger studies and in real-life settings, before stimulant treatment can be recommended in bipolar disorder.
Large-scale observational data sets may be utilized to investigate combination therapies that are difficult or too costly to survey in a randomized controlled setting. But observational studies are hampered by confounding by indication—that is, subjects who receive a prescription for medication are inherently different from those who do not. However, several recent pharmacoepidemiological studies have employed within-individual study designs that better account for genetic and environmental confounders (23, 28–30). This design will automatically adjust for individual-specific confounders that normally restrict the usefulness of observational studies, including disorder liability, genetics, and stable environmental factors (e.g., family environment, early trauma, and so on).
The aim of this study was to examine the risk of treatment-emergent mania when methylphenidate is used in adults with bipolar disorder. We linked national Swedish registers and assessed the risk of manic events in the 3 months and the 3–6 months following initiation of methylphenidate therapy as compared with nontreated periods of equal length. We stratified the cohort by presence or absence of concomitant mood-stabilizing medication to explore whether mood-stabilizing medication influences the risk of treatment-emergent mania. By applying a within-individual design, we controlled for individual-specific confounders like mania liability, genetic makeup, and environmental factors.
Method
Subjects
Swedish national registries were linked with high accuracy using the unique Swedish national registration numbers assigned to all residents (31). A search algorithm that has been demonstrated to yield a high positive predictive value was used to identify patients with bipolar disorder in the National Patient Register (32), which includes all Swedish inpatient admissions since 1973 and all outpatient specialist admissions since 2001 (33) and provides admission dates along with the main and eight secondary diagnosis codes in accordance with ICD classifications. Individuals were identified as having bipolar disorder if they had at least two inpatient or outpatient admissions with a discharge diagnosis of bipolar disorder (ICD-8 codes 296.00, 296.1, 296.3, 296.88, and 296.99; ICD-9 codes 296.0, 296.1, 296.3, 296.4, 296.8, and 296.9; ICD-10 codes F30 and F31). For the purposes of this study, we required that the diagnosis of bipolar disorder precede methylphenidate therapy. Additionally, to diminish the potential risk of misclassification, the included individuals were allowed a maximum of one inpatient or outpatient diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-8 code 295; ICD-9 code 295; ICD-10 code F25) and had to be 18 years of age at least 6 months before beginning methylphenidate treatment.
The study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Stockholm.
Exposure
Because methylphenidate is essentially the only psychostimulant used to treat comorbid ADHD in bipolar disorder in Sweden, it was the only one we studied. The period of exposure to methylphenidate was from July 2005 through 2013. Exposure status was ascertained using data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, which provides data on all dispensed prescription drugs in Sweden (34). The register provides prescription and dispensation dates, medication name, dosage, package size, and a code in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Using this register, we identified dispensations of methylphenidate (N06BA04). To be included, an individual was required to have received a dispensation of methylphenidate without any other methylphenidate dispensations during the preceding 9 months (period A in Figure 1), thereby ensuring that initiation of therapy occurred during that particular interval.
FIGURE 1. Design of a Registry Study of Treatment-Emergent Mania Associated With Methylphenidate in Patients With Comorbid Bipolar Disorder and ADHDa
a The design permits within-individual comparisons of mania after initiation of methylphenidate treatment with a preceding nontreatment period. The follow-up time is divided into 0–3 months and 3–6 months to assess both acute (switch) and longer-term effects.
The cohort was next divided according to whether or not patients received dispensations of mood stabilizers—medications approved for either treatment of mania or prevention of recurrent bipolar episodes, including aripiprazole (N05AX12), lithium (N05AN01), olanzapine (N05AH03), quetiapine (N05AH04), and valproate (N03AG01). To be classified as being on continuous mood-stabilizing treatment, an individual had to have at least two dispensations of a mood stabilizer in the 9 months preceding the start of methylphenidate treatment (period A in Figure 1), of which at least one had to occur within 6 months before the start of methylphenidate treatment (period B in Figure 1). To be classified as not using a mood stabilizer, an individual could not have had any dispensations of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, lamotrigine, lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, haloperidol, or risperidone during the 6 months preceding the start of methylphenidate treatment or at the date of the methylphenidate dispensation. Patients who were in neither of these groups were excluded.
Outcome
The occurrence of mania was ascertained using discharge diagnosis codes for mania (ICD-10 codes F30.0, F30.1, F30.2, F30.8, F30.9, F31.0, F30.1, and F30.2). A dispensation of an antipsychotic, lithium, or valproate after methylphenidate treatment could indicate treatment for a manic relapse or it could be a late safety measure. In analysis 1, dispensations of lithium, valproate, or antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, haloperidol, or risperidone) to individuals without any dispensations of these drugs during the 9 months preceding methylphenidate medication (i.e., new dispensations) was interpreted as treatment for elevated mood and counted toward a treatment-emergent mania. Dosages of aripiprazole below 5 mg/day, olanzapine below 5 mg/day, and quetiapine below 100 mg/day were not considered. In a supplemental analysis, new dispensations of lithium and valproate were not counted toward elevated mood (see appendix 1 in the data supplement that accompanies the online edition of this article). In analysis 2, only a diagnosis of mania counted as treatment-emergent mania.
Statistical Analysis
In total, 65,683 individuals with bipolar disorder were identified in the Swedish National Patient Register, of whom 5,506 (8.4%) had at least one dispensation of methylphenidate between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013. Among these, 2,307 (41.9%) met the criteria of having a period of 9 months without receiving any other doses of methylphenidate prior to the medication initiation and being over 18 years of age.
Similar to a previous study of antidepressant-induced manic switch (23), the effect of methylphenidate treatment on the rate of mania was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses using the STCOX command in STATA/IC, version 13. By conditioning on individual in the analyses (strata=individual), all subjects serve as their own control. This reduces confounding caused by differences between patients, including disorder severity (e.g., proneness to mania), genetic makeup, and environmental factors. We compared the rate of mania during a 6-month period before the start of methylphenidate treatment (period B in Figure 1) with a 6-month period following the start of methylphenidate treatment (period C in Figure 1). This provided the relative rate of mania following treatment, that is, the change or relative risk, rather than the absolute rate of mania, which may be inherently different between patients or patient groups (e.g., those with or without concomitant mood stabilizer treatment). To allow for assessment of both acute and more long-term effects (20), interaction terms with split follow-up time (0–3 months, 3–6 months) were included in the statistical model. To account for deaths and migrations, we utilized the Cause of Death and Migration registries. If the patient died, emigrated, or was diagnosed with schizophrenia during the treatment period (period C in Figure 1), the follow-up was censored at this time. In a supplemental analysis, a diagnosis of schizophrenia after methylphenidate treatment was counted toward mania (see appendix 2 in the online data supplement ).
Results
Table 1 presents descriptive statistics for the 2,307 subjects included in this study. Males made up 36.8% (N=848) of the cohort, and the distribution among the age groups 18–24 years, 25–39 years, and ≥40 years was 15.4%, 46.8%, and 37.8%, respectively. Among the 2,307 subjects in the study, 718 (31.1%) received no mood-stabilizing treatment, 1,103 (47.8%) met the criteria for being on mood-stabilizing treatment, and 486 (21.1%) did not meet either criterion and were not included in subsequent analyses. (For the types of stabilizing drugs dispensed, see appendix 3 in the online data supplement .)
| Characteristic | No Mood-Stabilizing Medication (N=718) | Mood-Stabilizing Medication (N=1,103) | Full Samplea (N=2,307) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Male | 234 | 32.6 | 443 | 40.2 | 848 | 36.8 |
| Age group | ||||||
| 18–24 years | 122 | 17.0 | 161 | 14.6 | 356 | 15.4 |
| 25–39 years | 322 | 44.9 | 523 | 47.4 | 1,079 | 46.8 |
| ≥40 years | 274 | 38.2 | 419 | 38.0 | 872 | 37.8 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Unmarried | 476 | 66.3 | 691 | 62.7 | 1,462 | 63.4 |
| Married | 109 | 15.2 | 204 | 18.5 | 415 | 18.0 |
| Divorced | 128 | 17.8 | 201 | 18.2 | 415 | 18.0 |
| Widowed | 5 | 0.7 | 7 | 0.6 | 14 | 0.6 |
| Employed | 217 | 30.2 | 413 | 37.4 | 814 | 35.3 |
| In school | 99 | 13.8 | 133 | 12.1 | 303 | 13.1 |
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Age at first bipolar disorder diagnosis (years) | 32.2 | 10.9 | 32.8 | 10.5 | 32.8 | 10.6 |
| Annual household income (US$) | 31,324 | 24,793 | 35,092 | 28,088 | 34,743 | 47,124 |
a
The full sample includes a group of 486 patients with uncertain mood stabilizer exposure who were excluded from the analyses.
Methylphenidate and Risk of Mania Events Derived From Diagnoses and Dispensations of Stabilizing Medication
When we defined treatment-emergent mania as a diagnosis of mania or a new dispensation of an antipsychotic or a mood stabilizer, the absolute number of mania events during the complete 12 months of follow-up was lower among the 718 patients treated with methylphenidate monotherapy (N=61; mania rate=0.08) than among the 1,103 patients treated with a concurrent mood stabilizer (N=195; mania rate=0.18). However, the relative risk of mania following methylphenidate treatment among patients treated with methylphenidate monotherapy was increased in the first 3 months after treatment (hazard ratio=6.7, 95% CI=2.0–22.4) and in the subsequent 3 months (hazard ratio=9.7, 95% CI=2.9–31.7). By contrast, among patients treated with a concurrent mood stabilizer, the risk of mania was reduced in the initial 3 months (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.4–0.9) and slightly reduced in the subsequent 3 months (hazard ratio=0.9, 95% CI=0.5–1.7) (Table 2).
| Mania Events (12-Month Follow-Up) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Hazard Ratio | p | 95% CI | N | Rateb |
| No mood-stabilizing medicationc (N=718) | 61 | 0.08 | |||
| 0–3 months | 6.67 | 0.002 | 1.98–22.4 | ||
| 3–6 months | 9.67 | <0.001 | 2.94–31.7 | ||
| Mood-stabilizing medicationd (N=1,103) | 195 | 0.18 | |||
| 0–3 months | 0.56 | 0.010 | 0.36–0.87 | ||
| 3–6 months | 0.91 | 0.758 | 0.50–1.67 | ||
a
Patients whose mood stabilizer status was uncertain (N=486) were excluded from the analysis. If no dispensation of lithium, valproate, or an antipsychotic (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, haloperidol, or risperidone) was observed in the 9 months before methylphenidate treatment (period A in Figure 1), a dispensation after the start of methylphenidate treatment (period C in Figure 1) was considered an indication of elevated mood. This definition was applied to both groups, and dosages of aripiprazole, olanzapine, and quetiapine below 5 mg/day, 5 mg/day, and 100 mg/day, respectively, were not considered.
b
Rate denotes the number of identified mania events divided by the total number of patients in the group.
c
Patients in this group received no type of mood-stabilizing medication during the 6 months before the dispensation of methylphenidate (period B in Figure 1) or at the date of dispensation of methylphenidate. This includes lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, haloperidol, and carbamazepine.
d
Patients in this group had at least two dispensations of mood-stabilizing medication (lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole) within the 9 months before methylphenidate dispensation (period A in Figure 1). At least one dispensation of a mood-stabilizing medication had to be within 6 months before methylphenidate treatment (period B in Figure 1).
Methylphenidate and Risk of Mania Derived From Diagnoses Only
When treatment-emergent mania was defined using diagnoses of mania only, the absolute number of mania events was reduced but maintained a similar distribution. The relative risk of mania following methylphenidate medication in the monotherapy group was elevated, although not statistically significantly, in the initial 3 months after treatment (hazard ratio=3.3, 95% CI=0.9–12.1) and unchanged in the subsequent 3 months (hazard ratio=1.0, 95% CI=0.2–5.0). Similar to the first analysis, among patients treated with a concurrent mood stabilizer, the risk of mania was reduced in the initial 3 months (hazard ratio=0.5, 95% CI=0.3–0.8) and slightly reduced in the subsequent 3 months, although not statistically significantly (hazard ratio=0.9, 95% CI=0.5–1.6) (Table 3).
| Mania Events (12-Month Follow-Up) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Hazard Ratio | p | 95% CI | N | Rateb |
| No mood-stabilizing medicationc (N=718) | 24 | 0.03 | |||
| 0–3 months | 3.33 | 0.067 | 0.92–12.11 | ||
| 3–6 months | 1.00 | 1.000 | 0.20–4.95 | ||
| Mood-stabilizing medicationd (N=1,103) | 144 | 0.13 | |||
| 0–3 months | 0.48 | 0.002 | 0.30–0.77 | ||
| 3–6 months | 0.86 | 0.640 | 0.47–1.60 | ||
a
Patients whose mood stabilizer status was uncertain (N=486) were excluded from the analysis.
b
Rate denotes the number of identified mania events divided by the total number of patients in the group.
c
Patients in this group received no type of mood-stabilizing medication during the 6 months before the dispensation of methylphenidate (period B in Figure 1) or at the date of dispensation of methylphenidate. This includes lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, haloperidol, and carbamazepine.
d
Patients in this group had at least two dispensations of mood-stabilizing medication (lithium, valproate, olanzapine, quetiapine, or aripiprazole) within the 9 months before methylphenidate dispensation (period A in Figure 1). At least one dispensation of a mood-stabilizing medication had to be within 6 months before methylphenidate treatment (period B in Figure 1).
Treatment-Associated Mania: Methylphenidate and Antidepressants
In a previous study (23), we used similar data and methodologies to assess the risk of treatment-emergent mania due to antidepressant therapy in bipolar disorder. Figure 2 contrasts the results from that study with those from the present study and suggests that concomitant stabilizing treatment attenuates the risk of medication-induced mania by methylphenidate and antidepressants in a similar fashion. In supplemental analyses, we found no evidence for an association or interaction between concomitant antidepressant treatment and mania after methylphenidate treatment (see appendix 4 on the online data supplement ).
FIGURE 2. Summary of the Results of the Present Study and Those of a Previous Study on Antidepressants and Mood Stabilizers Using a Similar Methodologya
a The antidepressant study is reported in reference 23. In the present study, the distribution of antidepressant treatment before and after methylphenidate treatment was similar in the two groups (those receiving and those not receiving mood-stabilizing medication), with no apparent changes correlated with the initiation of methylphenidate treatment, which thus does not support the possibility that an increased risk of mania after methylphenidate treatment is attributable to antidepressant treatment (see appendix 5 in the online data supplement ).
Discussion
In the largest study to date (N=2,307), we examined the risk of treatment-emergent mania in patients with bipolar disorder when methylphenidate is taken alone or in combination with mood-stabilizing medication. We found that methylphenidate may be associated with treatment-emergent mania in patients on methylphenidate monotherapy, but no evidence was found for a positive association between methylphenidate and treatment-emergent mania among bipolar patients who were concomitantly receiving a mood stabilizer.
Previous research on the effectiveness and tolerability of stimulant medication in patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid ADHD is limited, both in number of studies and number of participants (18, 24–27). Furthermore, these studies are restricted to combinations of stabilizing medications and stimulants, and they survey different types of stimulants and different populations (adults or children). Nevertheless, our finding that methylphenidate in combination with a stabilizing medication is not associated with a risk of treatment-emergent mania is in line with previous studies. For example, an open-label study of 14 adult patients with bipolar disorder on stabilizing medication reported no incidences of adverse elevated mood after initiation of methylphenidate treatment (25). Similarly, a 4-week placebo-controlled trial of methylphenidate in combination with mood stabilizers in 16 patients 5–17 years of age with bipolar disorder and comorbid ADHD found methylphenidate to be well tolerated and reported improved ADHD symptoms at the end of the study (26). In another open-label study, 40 adult patients with comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder were studied during 4 weeks of combination treatment with a mood stabilizer and the stimulant lisdexamfetamine (24). The study found improved ADHD and depressive symptoms and no increased risk of treatment-emergent mania, which echoes findings in previous studies of methylphenidate (25, 26). Finally, in a 4-week randomized controlled trial of 40 patients 6–17 years of age with comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder, treatment with divalproex and amphetamine was found to be more effective in treating ADHD symptoms than divalproex and placebo (27), with only one participant in the stimulant group experiencing mania.
Although there have been no randomized studies of methylphenidate monotherapy in bipolar disorder to which our findings can be contrasted, an earlier study (23) of the risk of treatment-emergent mania due to antidepressant monotherapy in bipolar disorder, using a similar methodology, obtained results analogous to those of the present study (Figure 2).
Given that up to 20% of patients with bipolar disorder may suffer from comorbid ADHD (4, 9, 35), it is not surprising that 8.4% of all identified Swedish bipolar disorder patients received at least one prescription for methylphenidate during an 8-year period. Stabilizing medications effectively prevent mood episodes but may worsen attention and concentration, which can impair everyday functioning in this subgroup of patients. Although previous studies suggest that stimulant use in comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder improves ADHD symptoms (24–27), a remaining concern has been whether stimulants are safe in bipolar disorder, particularly in terms of treatment-emergent mania. Our large-scale study indicating no increased risk of treatment-emergent mania when methylphenidate is used in combination with a mood stabilizer is thus reassuring, and it suggests that this combination may provide a welcome treatment option for this complicated patient group (4, 9).
Strengths of this study include the large number of subjects and the naturalistic setting. The study includes individuals who, for various reasons, would have been excluded from or would not have volunteered for a clinical trial. Moreover, the use of a within-individual design automatically adjusts for a large number of individual-specific factors, including prior disorder severity, genetic makeup, and environmental factors, which would not be possible to adjust for in a conventional epidemiological approach. This provides an improved strategy for handling selection effects and confounding by indication in pharmacoepidemiological studies, which is exemplified by the difference in overall mania rates between the groups on monotherapy and on concomitant mood stabilizers.
A limitation of this study is that although the design allows for extensive adjustment of otherwise unmeasured confounders, it does not adjust for changes that might have occurred during the 12-month follow-up. Given the observational nature of the study, we cannot rule out the possibility that unmeasured factors may be specific for each group. Hence, the increased risk of mania in the monotherapy group may be attributable to untreated bipolarity rather than the methylphenidate treatment per se. It is thus important to confirm the findings in other samples and with other study designs.
It should be noted that the elevated risk of treatment-emergent mania in the monotherapy group was not statistically significant when only mania diagnoses were taken into account (p=0.067). Even though this is likely to be due to the small sample size of the monotherapy group, it highlights the fact that the number needed to harm is high (i.e., the risk of treatment-emergent mania is low). Nonetheless, patients in the monotherapy group likely lacked a mood-stabilizing treatment precisely because they had a history of lower rate of mania than those who were on a mood stabilizer (see the mania rates in Table 2 and Table 3). This is important to consider because if the patients treated with a mood stabilizer (with a higher underlying risk of mania) were put on methylphenidate monotherapy, they might present a lower number needed to harm.
Whereas the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in the Swedish National Patient Register has been validated (32), the diagnosis of acute mania has not. The diagnosis of acute mania in a patient with known bipolar disorder is, however, likely to be valid. It should be noted, however, that even though this study is likely to have accurately captured the severe end of the mania spectrum, it may have failed to capture hypomania and elated mood that did not lead to a hospitalization. This is why we combined diagnoses of mania and new dispensations of antipsychotic medication at dosages that correspond with an antimanic treatment. In doing so, 37 additional mania events (5.2%) were observed in the monotherapy group (N=718), whereas 51 additional mania events (4.6%) were observed in the mood stabilizer group (N=1,103). It is further possible that changes in type or dosage of stabilizing medication also indicate elevated mood. However, this was not considered, given the ambiguity of such changes. It should also be noted that new adjunctive stabilizing treatment might not represent a manic relapse but rather a late safety measure by a treating clinician. Furthermore, the diagnoses in the National Patient Register can only identify bipolar disorder as a whole—they cannot distinguish between bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. It is possible that patients with these two different presentations of bipolar disorder respond differently to methylphenidate treatment, which warrants further research.
Our study focused only on treatment-emergent mania. We did not assess the effectiveness of the stimulant medication on ADHD symptoms. The study can thus neither inform us about the risk-benefit ratio of using stimulants in bipolar disorder nor elucidate potential synergistic effects of the combination of methylphenidate and mood stabilizer treatment. Lastly, because of the large number of different drugs used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, specific stabilizing medications could not be studied individually.
Conclusions
This study suggests that methylphenidate may increase the risk of treatment-emergent mania in patients suffering from bipolar disorder when it is used without a concomitant mood-stabilizing treatment. On the basis of this finding, we recommend careful assessment to rule out bipolar disorder before initiating methylphenidate as a monotherapy. As no association with treatment-emergent mania was observed among bipolar patients who were concomitantly receiving a mood-stabilizing medication, it would appear that concomitant therapy of ADHD is both safe and feasible in the context of ongoing preventive therapy. Although this study utilized a within-individual design to better handle confounding, the study used observational data, so not all potential confounding can be ruled out. Therefore, more research is warranted in this important area to further elucidate the potential mania-inducing properties of methylphenidate and the extent to which stabilizing drugs hamper this adverse reaction.
Footnote
Supported by the Swedish Research Council through the Swedish Initiative for research on Microdata in the Social and Medical Sciences (SIMSAM) framework (grant 340-2013-5867), the Swedish Medical Research Council (grants K2014-62X-14647-12-51 and K2010-61P-21568-01-4), and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (grant KF10-0039). The authors also acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Research Council (grant 2013-2280) and through NIMH (grant 1R01MH102221).
Supplementary Material
File (appi.ajp.2016.16040467.ds001.pdf)
- Download
- 1.73 MB
References
1.
Merikangas KR, Jin R, He JP, et al: Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68:241–251
2.
Thase ME: Bipolar depression: diagnostic and treatment considerations. Dev Psychopathol 2006; 18:1213–1230
3.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2013
4.
Nierenberg AA, Miyahara S, Spencer T, et al: Clinical and diagnostic implications of lifetime attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity in adults with bipolar disorder: data from the first 1000 STEP-BD participants. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:1467–1473
5.
Ekman M, Granström O, Omérov S, et al: The societal cost of bipolar disorder in Sweden. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48:1601–1610
6.
Thapar A, Cooper M: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2016; 387:1240–1250.
7.
Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, et al: The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:942–948
8.
Cowen P, Harrison PJ, Burns T: Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, 6th ed. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 2012
9.
Rydén E, Thase ME, Stråht D, et al: A history of childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) impacts clinical outcome in adult bipolar patients regardless of current ADHD. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009; 120:239–246
10.
Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, et al: The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:716–723
11.
Larsson H, Rydén E, Boman M, et al: Risk of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in relatives of people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 203:103–106
12.
Rydén E, Johansson C, Blennow K, et al: Lower CSF HVA and 5-HIAA in bipolar disorder type 1 with a history of childhood ADHD. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2009; 116:1667–1674
13.
Geddes JR, Miklowitz DJ: Treatment of bipolar disorder. Lancet 2013; 381:1672–1682
14.
Arnsten AF: Stimulants: therapeutic actions in ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31:2376–2383
15.
Scheffler RM, Hinshaw SP, Modrek S, et al: The global market for ADHD medications. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26:450–457
16.
van den Ban E, Souverein P, Swaab H, et al: Trends in incidence and characteristics of children, adolescents, and adults initiating immediate- or extended-release methylphenidate or atomoxetine in the Netherlands during 2001–2006. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2010; 20:55–61
17.
Klassen LJ, Katzman MA, Chokka P: Adult ADHD and its comorbidities, with a focus on bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 2010; 124:1–8
18.
Perugi G, Vannucchi G: The use of stimulants and atomoxetine in adults with comorbid ADHD and bipolar disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015; 16:2193–2204
19.
Altshuler LL, Post RM, Leverich GS, et al: Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1130–1138
20.
Goldberg DP: Diagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2010
21.
Pacchiarotti I, Bond DJ, Baldessarini RJ, et al: The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170:1249–1262
22.
Tondo L, Vázquez G, Baldessarini RJ: Mania associated with antidepressant treatment: comprehensive meta-analytic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010; 121:404–414
23.
Viktorin A, Lichtenstein P, Thase ME, et al: The risk of switch to mania in patients with bipolar disorder during treatment with an antidepressant alone and in combination with a mood stabilizer. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 171:1067–1073
24.
McIntyre RS, Alsuwaidan M, Soczynska JK, et al: The effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on body weight, metabolic parameters, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptomatology in adults with bipolar I/II disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol 2013; 28:421–427
25.
El-Mallakh RS: An open study of methylphenidate in bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord 2000; 2:56–59
26.
Findling RL, Short EJ, McNamara NK, et al: Methylphenidate in the treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46:1445–1453
27.
Scheffer RE, Kowatch RA, Carmody T, et al: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of mixed amphetamine salts for symptoms of comorbid ADHD in pediatric bipolar disorder after mood stabilization with divalproex sodium. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:58–64
28.
Lichtenstein P, Halldner L, Zetterqvist J, et al: Medication for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and criminality. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:2006–2014
29.
Fazel S, Zetterqvist J, Larsson H, et al: Antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, and risk of violent crime. Lancet 2014; 384:1206–1214
30.
Chang Z, Lichtenstein P, Halldner L, et al: Stimulant ADHD medication and risk for substance abuse. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; 55:878–885
31.
Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, et al: The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24:659–667
32.
Sellgren C, Landén M, Lichtenstein P, et al: Validity of bipolar disorder hospital discharge diagnoses: file review and multiple register linkage in Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011; 124:447–453
33.
Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al: External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:450
34.
Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM, et al: The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register: opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16:726–735
35.
Torres I, Gómez N, Colom F, et al: Bipolar disorder with comorbid attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder: main clinical features and clues for an accurate diagnosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015; 132:389–399
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: 23 April 2016
Revision received: 14 July 2016
Accepted: 8 August 2016
Published online: 3 October 2016
Published in print: April 01, 2017
Keywords
Authors
Competing Interests
Dr. Thase has served as a consultant for Alkermes, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cerecor, Eli Lilly, Fabre-Kramer Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Gerson Lehrman Group, GlaxoSmithKline, Guidepoint Global, Lundbeck, MedAvante, Merck (formerly Schering Plough and Organon), Moksha8, Naurex, Neuronetics, Novartis, Ortho-McNeil (Johnson & Johnson, Janssen), Otsuka, Pamlab (Nestle); Pfizer (formerly Wyeth Ayerst Pharmaceuticals), Shire, Sunovion, Takeda, and Trius Therapeutical; he has received grant funding from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Alkermes, AssureRx, Avanir, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, NIMH, and Otsuka; he has equity holdings in MedAvante and receives royalty income from American Psychiatric Foundation, Guilford Publications, Herald House, Oxford University Press, and W.W. Norton; his wife is employed by Peloton Advantage, which does business with Pfizer. Dr. Larsson has served as a speaker for Eli Lilly and Shire and has received a research grant from Shire. Dr. Landén has received lecture honoraria from BioPhausia Sweden and Servier Sweden. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Funding Information
National Institute of Mental Health10.13039/100000025: 1R01MH102221
The Swedish Research Council: 2013-2280
the Swedish Research Council through the Swedish Initiative for research on Microdata in the Social and Medical Sciences (SIMSAM) framework: 340-2013-5867
The Swedish foundation for Strategic Research: KF10-0039
The Swedish Medical Research Council: K2010-61P-21568-01-4, K2014-62X-14647-12-51
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
There are no citations for this item
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet Access
Login options
Already a subscriber? Access your subscription through your login credentials or your institution for full access to this article.
Personal login Institutional Login Open Athens loginNot a subscriber?
PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5-TR® library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources. This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development.
Need more help? PsychiatryOnline Customer Service may be reached by emailing [email protected] or by calling 800-368-5777 (in the U.S.) or 703-907-7322 (outside the U.S.).